UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SYMANTEC CORP., and
`BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case: IPR2015-018921
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`CONSOLIDATED FILING:
`
`PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO
`PATENT OWNER'S IDENTIFICATION OF ARGUMENTS ALLEGEDLY
`EXCEEDING THE PROPER SCOPE OF REPLY
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00890 has been joined with the instant proceeding
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SYMANTEC CORP., and
`BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case: IPR2015-018921
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`CONSOLIDATED FILING:
`
`PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO
`PATENT OWNER'S IDENTIFICATION OF ARGUMENTS ALLEGEDLY
`EXCEEDING THE PROPER SCOPE OF REPLY
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00890 has been joined with the instant proceeding
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`Symantec 1001
`Symantec 1002
`
`Symantec 1003
`Symantec 1004
`
`Symantec 1005
`
`Symantec 1006
`Symantec 1007
`Symantec 1008
`Symantec 1009
`Symantec 1010
`Symantec 1011
`Symantec 1012
`Symantec 1013
`Symantec 1014
`
`Symantec 1015
`
`Symantec 1016
`
`Symantec 1017
`
`Symantec 1018
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Description
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494 to Edery et al. (“the ‘494 patent”)
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/030,639 (“the ‘639
`provisional”)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,313,616 to David C. Cline et al. (“Cline”)
`A Sense of Self for Unix Processes, by Stephanie Forrest et
`al., Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Security
`and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996. (“Forrest”)
`Dynamic Detection and Classification of Computer Viruses
`Using General Behaviour Patterns, by Morton Swimmer et
`al., Virus Bulletin Conference, Virus Bulletin Ltd., September
`1995. (“Swimmer”)
`Declaration by Dr. Sylvia Hall-Ellis
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Sylvia Hall-Ellis
`Xplore Digital Library Database printout (Forrest)
`MARC record OCLC record number 34969890 (Forrest)
`1995 Virus Bulletin Proceedings
`MARC record OCLC record number 33834197 (Swimmer)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,623,600 to Shuang Ji et al. (“Ji”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,092,194 (“the ‘194 patent”)
`Webster’s College Dictionary, 1999 Second Random House
`Edition, p. 339
`Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, 1991 Merriam-Webster
`Inc., p. 325
`Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 4th
`Edition 1992, Simon & Schuster, Inc., p. 95
`Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement, Dkt. No.
`68, Case No. 3:14cv2998
`Declaration of Jack Davidson in Support of Petition
`(“Davidson Dec.”)
`
`i
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`Symantec 1019
`Symantec 1020
`Symantec 1021
`Symantec 1022
`Symantec 1023
`
`Symantec 1024
`
`Symantec 1025
`Symantec 1026
`Symantec 1027
`
`Symantec 1028
`Symantec 1029
`
`Symantec 1030
`
`Symantec 1031
`
`Symantec 1032
`
`Symantec 1033
`Symantec 1034
`
`Symantec 1035
`Symantec 1036
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`Description
`Curriculum Vitae of Jack Davidson
`Advanced MS-DOS
`U.S. Patent No. 5,978,484 to Apperson et al. (“Apperson”)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,892,904 to Atkinson et al. (“Atkinson”)
`Efficient Software-Based Fault Isolation, by Robert Wahbe et
`al., ACM SIGOPS (Special Interest Group on Operating
`Systems) Symposium on Operating Systems Principles,
`December 1993
`Scott and Davidson, “Safe Virtual Execution Using Software
`Dynamic Translation”, 2002
`Affidavit of Alexander Walden
`Virus Bulletin Conference Proceedings Sept. 1995
`Declaration of Dr. Jack Davidson in Support of Petitioner’s
`Reply
`Updated Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Jack Davidson
`Selected Definitions from Microsoft Computer Dictionary 3rd
`Edition, 1997 (“MSCD”)
`D. Comer, “The Flat File Database Generator ffg”, Computer
`Science Technical Reports, Purdue University, 1981
`(“Comer”)
`G. Fowler, “cql - A flat file Database Query Language”, In
`Proceedings of the Winter 1994 USENIX Conference , San
`Francisco, California, Jan. 1994 (“Fowler”)
`D. Denning, “An intrusion detection model”, IEEE
`Transactions on Software Engineering, 13-2:222, Feb 1987
`(“Denning”)
`Intel 8086 Family User’s Manual (“8086 Manual”)
`Transcript of Deposition of Dr. Medvidovic in IPR2015-
`01892 taken on Aug. 19, 2016
`U.S. Patent No. 5,398,196 (“the ‘196 patent”)
`A. Mounji et al. “Distributed Audit Trail Analysis”, In
`Proceedings of the Internet Society Symposium on Network
`
`ii
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Symantec 1037
`Symantec 1038
`Symantec 1039
`
`Symantec 1040
`Symantec 1041
`Symantec 1042
`Symantec 1043
`Symantec 1044
`
`Symantec 1045
`
`Symantec 1046
`Symantec 1047
`Symantec 1048
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`Description
`and Distributed System Security (ISOC'95), San Diego,
`California, Feb 1995, IEEE (“Mounji”)
`Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Sylvia Hall-Ellis
`Declaration of Dr. Richard Ford
`Exhibit C to Declaration of Dr. Richard Ford - Excerpts from
`Virus Bulletin Conference Proceedings Sept. 1995
`Exhibit E to Declaration of Dr. Richard Ford – Photograph
`Declaration of Joseph Kiegel
`MARC Record - Denning
`MARC Record – Fowler
`Declaration of John Hawes of Virus Bulletin, dated October
`15, 2015
`Declaration of John Hawes of Virus Bulletin, dated October
`7, 2016
`The Delegates, 1995 Virus Bulletin International Conference
`Brochure - 1995 Virus Bulletin
`Virus Bulletin magazine, November 1995
`
`iii
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`Pursuant to the Board's October 26, 2016 Order (Paper 37), Petitioner
`
`responds as follows to Patent Owner's identification of arguments allegedly
`
`exceeding the proper scope of reply (Paper 39)2:
`
`1.
`
`Pet (Paper 1): p. 17, l. 11 - p. 18, l. 7. Ex. 1018, ¶153. POR (Paper 27): p. 11,
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`l. 11 - p. 12, l. 6; p. 24, l. 6-11; p. 27, l. 16-19. 3
`
`Pet: p. 12, l. 19 - p. 14, l. 14.
`
`Pet: p. 17, l. 11 - p. 18, l. 7. POR: p. 11, l. 8-10; p. 27, l. 20 - p. 28, l. 5.
`
`Pet: p. 18, l. 8-15. Ex. 1018, ¶44-47. POR: p. 4, l. 7-10; p. 29, l. 11 - p. 30, l. 2.
`
`Pet: p. 19, l. 2 - p. 20, l. 13. POR: p. 30, l. 5 - p. 33, l. 6.
`
`Pet: p. 18, l. 8-15. Ex. 1018, ¶44-47. POR: p. 4, l. 7-10; p. 29, l. 11 - p. 30, l. 2;
`
`p. 3, l. 3 - p. 4, l. 3; p. 19, l. 12 - p. 20, l. 12; p. 32, l. 18-20.
`
`See response to #6.
`
`Pet: p. 20, l. 1-6. POR: p. 14, l. 2 - p. 15, l. 10; p. 19, l. 17 - p. 20, l. 3; p. 34, l.
`
`5 - p. 35, l. 16.
`
`9.
`
`Pet: p. 20, l. 1-6. POR: p. 45, l. 13-16; p. 46, l. 18 - p. 47, l. 6.
`
`2 Patent Owner failed to provide a “concise description” for its citations, as
`
`required in the Board’s order (Paper No. 37 at 2) and, therefore, Petitioner is
`
`unclear as to what the basis is for each of its objection.
`
`3 The evidence cited to within the pin-cites to the POR is intended to be considered
`
`as part of the material to which the Reply arguments and evidence are responsive.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`Pet: p. 19, l. 2-16. POR: p. 37, l. 18 - p. 38, l. 15.
`
`Pet: p. 19, l. 2-16. POR: p. 37, l. 18 - p. 38, l. 2; p. 38, l. 16 - p. 39 , l. 8.
`
`See response to #11.
`
`Pet: p. 19, l. 2 – 16. POR: p. 38, l. 16 - p. 39, l. 8.
`
`POR: p. 22, l. 4-12; p. 29, l. 5-9; p. 16, l. 6-10; p. 46, l. 18 - p. 47, l. 6.
`
`Pet: p. 20, l. 1-13; p. 24, l. 19 - p. 25, l. 7. POR: p. 48, l. 9 - p. 49, l. 1.
`
`Pet: p. 24, l. 19 - p. 25, l. 7. POR: p. 48, l. 9 - p. 49, l. 1.
`
`Pet: p. 24, l. 19 - p. 25, l. 7. POR: p. 26, l. 4-11; p. 50, l. 6-10.
`
`Pet: p. 22, l. 5 - p. 23, l. 9. POR: p. 52, l. 5 - p. 53, l. 17.
`
`Pet: p. 4, l. 18 - p. 5, l. 4. POR: p. 16, l. 18-19; p. 5, l. 4-7; p. 18, l. 1-5.
`
`Pet: p. 4, l. 18 - p. 5, l. 4. POR: p. 16, l. 18-19.
`
`Pet: p. 4, l. 16 - p. 5, l. 4. POR: p. 16, l. 18-19; p. 5, l. 7-9; p. 17, l. 14 - p. 18,
`
`l. 7.
`
`22.
`
`1026 (See #19, 21); 1027 (See #3, 4, 6-8, 10, 13-16, 18); 10294 (See #3, 9);
`
`1030-31 (See #11, 12); 1032 (See #17); 1033 (See #3); 1035 (See #1); 1037
`
`(See #20); 1038-41 (See #21). See also generally POR.
`
`4 Patent Owner first introduced the Microsoft Computer Dictionary 3rd Edition.
`
`See POR at 38, 39, 42, and 53 (citing Ex. 2024).
`
`2
`
`
`
`Date: November 22, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`By: /Joseph J. Richetti/
`Joseph J. Richetti (Reg. No. 47,024)
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner – Symantec
`Corporation
`
`By: /Michael T. Rosato/
`Michael T. Rosato (Reg. No. 52,182)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Attorney for Petitioner – Blue Coat
`Systems, Inc.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PETITIONER’S
`RESPONSE TO PATENT OWNER'S IDENTIFICATION OF ARGUMENTS
`ALLEGEDLY EXCEEDING THE PROPER SCOPE OF REPLY, was served
`electronically via e-mail on November 22, 2016, in its entirety on the following
`counsel for Patent Owner:
`
`James Hannah
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS &
`FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`
`Michael Kim
`Finjan, Inc.
`2000 University Ave., Ste. 600
`E. Palo Alto, CA 94303
`mkim@finjan.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph J. Richetti/
`Joseph J. Richetti (Reg. No. 47,024)
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104
`Tel: (212) 541-1092
`Fax: (212) 541-4630
`joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner– Symantec
`Corporation
`
`Date: November 22, 2016
`
`Jeffrey H. Price
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS &
`FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`jprice@kramerlevin.com
`
`By: /Michael T. Rosato/
`Michael T. Rosato (Reg. No. 52,182)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH &
`ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104
`Tel: (206) 883-2529
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner– Blue Coat
`Systems, Inc.
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
