`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SYMANTEC CORP., and
`BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case: IPR2015-018921
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`CONSOLIDATED FILING:
`
`PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO
`PATENT OWNER'S IDENTIFICATION OF ARGUMENTS ALLEGEDLY
`EXCEEDING THE PROPER SCOPE OF REPLY
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00890 has been joined with the instant proceeding
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`Symantec 1001
`Symantec 1002
`
`Symantec 1003
`Symantec 1004
`
`Symantec 1005
`
`Symantec 1006
`Symantec 1007
`Symantec 1008
`Symantec 1009
`Symantec 1010
`Symantec 1011
`Symantec 1012
`Symantec 1013
`Symantec 1014
`
`Symantec 1015
`
`Symantec 1016
`
`Symantec 1017
`
`Symantec 1018
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Description
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494 to Edery et al. (“the ‘494 patent”)
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/030,639 (“the ‘639
`provisional”)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,313,616 to David C. Cline et al. (“Cline”)
`A Sense of Self for Unix Processes, by Stephanie Forrest et
`al., Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Security
`and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996. (“Forrest”)
`Dynamic Detection and Classification of Computer Viruses
`Using General Behaviour Patterns, by Morton Swimmer et
`al., Virus Bulletin Conference, Virus Bulletin Ltd., September
`1995. (“Swimmer”)
`Declaration by Dr. Sylvia Hall-Ellis
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Sylvia Hall-Ellis
`Xplore Digital Library Database printout (Forrest)
`MARC record OCLC record number 34969890 (Forrest)
`1995 Virus Bulletin Proceedings
`MARC record OCLC record number 33834197 (Swimmer)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,623,600 to Shuang Ji et al. (“Ji”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,092,194 (“the ‘194 patent”)
`Webster’s College Dictionary, 1999 Second Random House
`Edition, p. 339
`Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, 1991 Merriam-Webster
`Inc., p. 325
`Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms, 4th
`Edition 1992, Simon & Schuster, Inc., p. 95
`Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement, Dkt. No.
`68, Case No. 3:14cv2998
`Declaration of Jack Davidson in Support of Petition
`(“Davidson Dec.”)
`
`i
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`Symantec 1019
`Symantec 1020
`Symantec 1021
`Symantec 1022
`Symantec 1023
`
`Symantec 1024
`
`Symantec 1025
`Symantec 1026
`Symantec 1027
`
`Symantec 1028
`Symantec 1029
`
`Symantec 1030
`
`Symantec 1031
`
`Symantec 1032
`
`Symantec 1033
`Symantec 1034
`
`Symantec 1035
`Symantec 1036
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`Description
`Curriculum Vitae of Jack Davidson
`Advanced MS-DOS
`U.S. Patent No. 5,978,484 to Apperson et al. (“Apperson”)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,892,904 to Atkinson et al. (“Atkinson”)
`Efficient Software-Based Fault Isolation, by Robert Wahbe et
`al., ACM SIGOPS (Special Interest Group on Operating
`Systems) Symposium on Operating Systems Principles,
`December 1993
`Scott and Davidson, “Safe Virtual Execution Using Software
`Dynamic Translation”, 2002
`Affidavit of Alexander Walden
`Virus Bulletin Conference Proceedings Sept. 1995
`Declaration of Dr. Jack Davidson in Support of Petitioner’s
`Reply
`Updated Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Jack Davidson
`Selected Definitions from Microsoft Computer Dictionary 3rd
`Edition, 1997 (“MSCD”)
`D. Comer, “The Flat File Database Generator ffg”, Computer
`Science Technical Reports, Purdue University, 1981
`(“Comer”)
`G. Fowler, “cql - A flat file Database Query Language”, In
`Proceedings of the Winter 1994 USENIX Conference , San
`Francisco, California, Jan. 1994 (“Fowler”)
`D. Denning, “An intrusion detection model”, IEEE
`Transactions on Software Engineering, 13-2:222, Feb 1987
`(“Denning”)
`Intel 8086 Family User’s Manual (“8086 Manual”)
`Transcript of Deposition of Dr. Medvidovic in IPR2015-
`01892 taken on Aug. 19, 2016
`U.S. Patent No. 5,398,196 (“the ‘196 patent”)
`A. Mounji et al. “Distributed Audit Trail Analysis”, In
`Proceedings of the Internet Society Symposium on Network
`
`ii
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Symantec 1037
`Symantec 1038
`Symantec 1039
`
`Symantec 1040
`Symantec 1041
`Symantec 1042
`Symantec 1043
`Symantec 1044
`
`Symantec 1045
`
`Symantec 1046
`Symantec 1047
`Symantec 1048
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`Description
`and Distributed System Security (ISOC'95), San Diego,
`California, Feb 1995, IEEE (“Mounji”)
`Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Sylvia Hall-Ellis
`Declaration of Dr. Richard Ford
`Exhibit C to Declaration of Dr. Richard Ford - Excerpts from
`Virus Bulletin Conference Proceedings Sept. 1995
`Exhibit E to Declaration of Dr. Richard Ford – Photograph
`Declaration of Joseph Kiegel
`MARC Record - Denning
`MARC Record – Fowler
`Declaration of John Hawes of Virus Bulletin, dated October
`15, 2015
`Declaration of John Hawes of Virus Bulletin, dated October
`7, 2016
`The Delegates, 1995 Virus Bulletin International Conference
`Brochure - 1995 Virus Bulletin
`Virus Bulletin magazine, November 1995
`
`iii
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`Pursuant to the Board's October 26, 2016 Order (Paper 37), Petitioner
`
`responds as follows to Patent Owner's identification of arguments allegedly
`
`exceeding the proper scope of reply (Paper 39)2:
`
`1.
`
`Pet (Paper 1): p. 17, l. 11 - p. 18, l. 7. Ex. 1018, ¶153. POR (Paper 27): p. 11,
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`l. 11 - p. 12, l. 6; p. 24, l. 6-11; p. 27, l. 16-19. 3
`
`Pet: p. 12, l. 19 - p. 14, l. 14.
`
`Pet: p. 17, l. 11 - p. 18, l. 7. POR: p. 11, l. 8-10; p. 27, l. 20 - p. 28, l. 5.
`
`Pet: p. 18, l. 8-15. Ex. 1018, ¶44-47. POR: p. 4, l. 7-10; p. 29, l. 11 - p. 30, l. 2.
`
`Pet: p. 19, l. 2 - p. 20, l. 13. POR: p. 30, l. 5 - p. 33, l. 6.
`
`Pet: p. 18, l. 8-15. Ex. 1018, ¶44-47. POR: p. 4, l. 7-10; p. 29, l. 11 - p. 30, l. 2;
`
`p. 3, l. 3 - p. 4, l. 3; p. 19, l. 12 - p. 20, l. 12; p. 32, l. 18-20.
`
`See response to #6.
`
`Pet: p. 20, l. 1-6. POR: p. 14, l. 2 - p. 15, l. 10; p. 19, l. 17 - p. 20, l. 3; p. 34, l.
`
`5 - p. 35, l. 16.
`
`9.
`
`Pet: p. 20, l. 1-6. POR: p. 45, l. 13-16; p. 46, l. 18 - p. 47, l. 6.
`
`2 Patent Owner failed to provide a “concise description” for its citations, as
`
`required in the Board’s order (Paper No. 37 at 2) and, therefore, Petitioner is
`
`unclear as to what the basis is for each of its objection.
`
`3 The evidence cited to within the pin-cites to the POR is intended to be considered
`
`as part of the material to which the Reply arguments and evidence are responsive.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`Pet: p. 19, l. 2-16. POR: p. 37, l. 18 - p. 38, l. 15.
`
`Pet: p. 19, l. 2-16. POR: p. 37, l. 18 - p. 38, l. 2; p. 38, l. 16 - p. 39 , l. 8.
`
`See response to #11.
`
`Pet: p. 19, l. 2 – 16. POR: p. 38, l. 16 - p. 39, l. 8.
`
`POR: p. 22, l. 4-12; p. 29, l. 5-9; p. 16, l. 6-10; p. 46, l. 18 - p. 47, l. 6.
`
`Pet: p. 20, l. 1-13; p. 24, l. 19 - p. 25, l. 7. POR: p. 48, l. 9 - p. 49, l. 1.
`
`Pet: p. 24, l. 19 - p. 25, l. 7. POR: p. 48, l. 9 - p. 49, l. 1.
`
`Pet: p. 24, l. 19 - p. 25, l. 7. POR: p. 26, l. 4-11; p. 50, l. 6-10.
`
`Pet: p. 22, l. 5 - p. 23, l. 9. POR: p. 52, l. 5 - p. 53, l. 17.
`
`Pet: p. 4, l. 18 - p. 5, l. 4. POR: p. 16, l. 18-19; p. 5, l. 4-7; p. 18, l. 1-5.
`
`Pet: p. 4, l. 18 - p. 5, l. 4. POR: p. 16, l. 18-19.
`
`Pet: p. 4, l. 16 - p. 5, l. 4. POR: p. 16, l. 18-19; p. 5, l. 7-9; p. 17, l. 14 - p. 18,
`
`l. 7.
`
`22.
`
`1026 (See #19, 21); 1027 (See #3, 4, 6-8, 10, 13-16, 18); 10294 (See #3, 9);
`
`1030-31 (See #11, 12); 1032 (See #17); 1033 (See #3); 1035 (See #1); 1037
`
`(See #20); 1038-41 (See #21). See also generally POR.
`
`4 Patent Owner first introduced the Microsoft Computer Dictionary 3rd Edition.
`
`See POR at 38, 39, 42, and 53 (citing Ex. 2024).
`
`2
`
`
`
`Date: November 22, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`By: /Joseph J. Richetti/
`Joseph J. Richetti (Reg. No. 47,024)
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`Attorney for Petitioner – Symantec
`Corporation
`
`By: /Michael T. Rosato/
`Michael T. Rosato (Reg. No. 52,182)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Attorney for Petitioner – Blue Coat
`Systems, Inc.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01892
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PETITIONER’S
`RESPONSE TO PATENT OWNER'S IDENTIFICATION OF ARGUMENTS
`ALLEGEDLY EXCEEDING THE PROPER SCOPE OF REPLY, was served
`electronically via e-mail on November 22, 2016, in its entirety on the following
`counsel for Patent Owner:
`
`James Hannah
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS &
`FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`
`Michael Kim
`Finjan, Inc.
`2000 University Ave., Ste. 600
`E. Palo Alto, CA 94303
`mkim@finjan.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph J. Richetti/
`Joseph J. Richetti (Reg. No. 47,024)
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104
`Tel: (212) 541-1092
`Fax: (212) 541-4630
`joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner– Symantec
`Corporation
`
`Date: November 22, 2016
`
`Jeffrey H. Price
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS &
`FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`jprice@kramerlevin.com
`
`By: /Michael T. Rosato/
`Michael T. Rosato (Reg. No. 52,182)
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH &
`ROSATI
`701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104
`Tel: (206) 883-2529
`Fax: (206) 883-2699
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`
`Attorney for Petitioner– Blue Coat
`Systems, Inc.