`
`__________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`
`SYMANTEC CORP., and
`BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2015-018921
`U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494
`
`__________________________________________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00890 has been joined with the instant proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2015-01892 (U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494)
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s March 18, 2016
`
`
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper 10), Patent Owner Finjan, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) requests
`
`an opportunity to present oral argument regarding the patentability of Claims 1, 2,
`
`5, 6, 10, 11, 14, and 15 (“Instituted Claims”) of U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494 (“the
`
`’494 Patent”). The oral argument is scheduled to be held on December 16, 2016.
`
`
`
`Without waiving consideration of any issue not identified below, Patent
`
`Owner requests one hour to address the following issues:
`
`1. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving that Instituted
`
`Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 14, and 15 of the ’494 Patent are
`
`unpatentable as obvious over Swimmer (Ex. 1005);
`
`2. Whether Petitioner has met its burden that Swimmer is prior art to the
`
`’494 Patent;
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Secondary considerations of non-obviousness of the ’494 Patent;
`
`Patent Owner’s and Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude Evidence, if any;
`
`Rebuttal of any arguments made by Petitioner;
`
`Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification; and
`
`Response to any issues Petitioner raises in its Request for Oral
`
`Argument.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner respectfully reserves the right to supplement and/or amend the
`
`foregoing statement of issues to the extent the Rules permit.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2015-01892 (U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494)
`
`
`At oral argument, Patent Owner requests the use of audio/visual equipment
`
`
`
`to display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen. In
`
`addition, Patent Owner’s expert, Dr. Medvidovic, may attend the hearing to answer
`
`any questions the Board may have.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 9, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/James Hannah/
`
`James Hannah (Reg. No. 56,369)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Tel: 650.752.1700 Fax: 650.752.1800
`
`
`
`Jeffrey Price (Reg. No. 69,141)
`jprice@kramerlevin.com
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: 212.715.7502 Fax: 212.715.8302
`
`Michael Kim (Reg. No. 40,450)
`mkim@finjan.com
`Finjan, Inc.
`2000 University Ave., Ste. 600
`E. Palo Alto, CA 94303
`Tel: 650.397.9567
`
` (Case No. IPR2015-01892) Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`IPR2015-01892 (U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494)
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that a true and
`
`correct copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument was
`
`served on November 9, 2016, by filing this document through the Patent Review
`
`Processing System as well as delivering via electronic mail upon the following
`
`counsel of record for Petitioner and Joinder Petitioner:
`
`Daniel A. Crowe
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`One Metropolitan Square
`211 N. Broadway, Suite 3600
`St. Louis, MO 63102
`dacrowe@bryancave.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /James Hannah/
`James Hannah (Reg. No. 56,369)
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road,
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 752-1700
`
`3
`
`Joseph J. Richetti
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104
`joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`
`
`
`Michael T. Rosato
`Andrew S. Brown
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH
`& ROSATI
`701 Fifth Ave., Ste. 5100
`Seattle, WA 98104
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`asbrown@wsgr.com