throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper No. 37
`
`Entered: October 26, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SYMANTEC CORP., and
`BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-018921
`Patent 8,677,494 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JAMES B. ARPIN, ZHENYU YANG, and
`CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00890 has been joined with the instant proceeding.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01892
`Patent 8,677,494 B2
`
`
`In an email message dated October 23, 2016, Patent Owner requested
`a conference call with the Board under 37 C.F.R. § 42.5, to request
`permission to file a paper identifying portions of Petitioner’s Reply
`(Paper 31) that Patent Owner believes raise new issues or belatedly present
`evidence.
`The panel has considered Patent Owner’s request, and a conference is
`not necessary. Patent Owner is authorized to file a paper calling the Board’s
`attention to those portions of Petitioner’s Reply that are believed by Patent
`Owner to raise new issues or belatedly present evidence. The paper should
`be in the form of a list providing the location and a concise description of
`any portion of the Petitioner’s Reply that Patent Owner wishes to draw to the
`Board’s attention, but it shall not contain argument. The paper is limited to
`two pages and should be filed by Due Date 4.
`We also authorize Petitioner to file a paper in response to Patent
`Owner’s submission. If filed by Petitioner, this paper should identify, in an
`itemized manner, what Petitioner regards as the material contained in the
`Patent Owner Response which triggered or caused the Petitioner to include
`in its Reply each item listed by Patent Owner or where each item listed by
`Patent Owner appears in the Petition, but it shall not contain argument. This
`paper is also limited to two pages and should be filed by Due Date 5.
`In rendering its Final Written Decision, the Board will determine what
`weight, if any, is to be given to all of the presented evidence and arguments
`in accordance with the rules of the Board.
`It is
`ORDERED that the parties are authorized to file the above-discussed
`papers consistent with the requirements and deadlines set forth in this Order.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01892
`Patent 8,677,494 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Joseph J. Richetti
`Daniel A. Crowe
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`joe.richetti@bryancave.com
`dacrowe@bryancave.com
`
`Michael T. Rosato
`Andrew S. Brown
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`asbrown@wsgr.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`James Hannah
`Jeffrey H. Price
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`jprice@kramerlevin.com
`
`Michael Kim
`FINJAN, INC.
`mkim@finjan.com
`
`
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket