throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`COMARCO WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01879
`Patent 8,492,933
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF BRETT J. WILLIAMSON IN SUPPORT
`OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2015-01879
`
`I, Brett J. Williamson, declare as follows:
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I am a Partner with the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP. I
`
`represent and advise Petitioner Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in connection with the
`
`above-captioned inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding and I am lead counsel in
`
`the underlying district court litigation (Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. v. Apple
`
`Inc., Case No. 8:15-cv-00145-AG-DFM (C.D. Cal.)) on the patent at issue in
`
`this IPR, U.S. Patent No. 8,492,933 (“’933 Patent”).
`
`2.
`
`I have been a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of
`
`California since 1989. My California State Bar number is 145235. I have been
`
`a member in good standing of the Bar of the District of Columbia since
`
`February 2015. My D.C. Bar number is 1024759. I am also admitted to
`
`practice before numerous federal courts:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`
`
`U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of California (since 1993);
`
`U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of California (since 1993);
`
`U.S.D.C. for the Southern District of California (since 1993);
`
`U.S.D.C. for the Central District of California (since 1989);
`
`U.S.D.C. for the District of Colorado (since 1999)
`
`U.S.C.A. for the Second Circuit (since 2014);
`
`U.S.C.A. for the Ninth Circuit (since 1989);
`
`U.S.C.A. for the Federal Circuit (since 2002); and
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`3.
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2015-01879
`
`i.
`
`U.S. Supreme Court (since 1995).
`
`I have over 25 years of experience practicing patent and technology
`
`related litigation. I have litigated numerous patent cases across the country,
`
`including in Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District
`
`of Columbia, Illinois, Nevada, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Virginia, and litigated
`
`many of them through both trial and appeal. A copy of my biography is
`
`provided as Appendix A.
`
`4.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I have
`
`supervised and been actively involved in the present IPR proceeding regarding
`
`the ’933 Patent. I represent Petitioner in concurrent litigation involving the
`
`’933 Patent, and I have extensively reviewed the patent, its file history, the
`
`Patent Owner’s preliminary infringement contentions served in the litigation,
`
`and the prior art being asserted in the petition for IPR in this proceeding. I
`
`have gained significant familiarity with the implicit claim construction issues in
`
`the underlying litigation, including the Patent Owner’s claimed claim scope as
`
`disclosed in its infringement contentions. These issues significantly overlap
`
`with the corresponding issues in this IPR proceeding.
`
`5. Moreover, I have advised Petitioner on strategy regarding Petitioner’s
`
`affirmative arguments in this IPR proceeding, supervised the drafting of the
`
`petition, reviewed the accompanying Declaration of Dr. Nathaniel Davis IV,
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`and worked with Petitioner to find and identify the references relied upon in
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2015-01879
`
`the petition and to draft other submissions to the Office.
`
`6.
`
`The prior art references at issue in the IPR proceedings are also at issue
`
`in the underlying litigation. I have reviewed both that art and a vast amount of
`
`additional, related prior art — all of which were disclosed in invalidity
`
`contentions that I participated in preparing and signed.
`
`7.
`
`I have represented clients in connection with many patent litigations
`
`regarding technology similar to that at issue in this IPR, which relates generally
`
`to mobile devices and electrical signals.
`
`8.
`
`I have worked closely with Dr. Davis, who provided a declaration in this
`
`IPR, regarding his declaration. I was also involved in identifying and retaining
`
`Dr. Davis as an expert in this IPR, and I signed his engagement letter.
`
`9.
`
`I frequently publish on issues concerning patent law and technology
`
`related litigation.
`
`10.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body. I have never had an application for admission to
`
`practice before any court or administrative body denied. No sanction or
`
`contempt citation has been imposed against me by any court or administrative
`
`body.
`
`11.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`12.
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2015-01879
`
`I agree to and will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`13.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice before the Office in any other
`
`proceeding in the last three years.
`
`14.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge
`
`are true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to
`
`be true. I further declare that these statements were made with the knowledge
`
`that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States
`
`Code and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the
`
`application or any patents issued thereon.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Brett J. Williamson
`Brett J. Williamson
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: 9/30/2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket