`_________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________________
`
`
`
`K.J. PRETECH CO., LTD. AND VIZIO, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________
`Case No. IPR2015-018681
`U.S. Patent No. 7,434,974 B2
`_________________________
`
`PETITIONER VIZIO, INC.’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`JASON LO UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
` 1 Case IPR2016-00910 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, and pursuant to the authorization provided by
`
`the Board on January 4, 2017, Petitioner VIZIO, Inc. (“VIZIO”) respectfully
`
`moves the admission of its counsel, Jason Lo, of Gibson, Dunn & Cruthcer LLP,
`
`pro hac vice, as back-up counsel for VIZIO. Good cause is present for the Board
`
`to recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding.
`
`Mr. Lo is an experience litigation attorney with over 15 years of litigation
`
`experience. Ex. 1027, ¶ 8. He has been involved in numerous patent
`
`infringement cases in federal district courts across the country. Id. He is a
`
`member in good standing of the California Bar. Id., ¶ 1. Mr. Lo has not been
`
`suspended or disbarred from practice, has never had any application for
`
`admission to practice denied, and has never had any sanctions or contempt
`
`citations imposed against him. Id., ¶¶ 2-4.
`
`VIZIO retained Mr. Lo as lead counsel with regard to the co-pending patent
`
`infringement lawsuit against Patent Owner Innovative Display Technologies, LLC
`
`in Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Vizio Inc., et al., No. 1:13-cv-02112 (D.
`
`Del.). Id., ¶ 8. Through his work on the case, Mr. Lo has developed substantial
`
`familiarity with the involved patent, the prior art, and the various issues raised in
`
`this proceeding. Id.
`
`Mr. Lo has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R., and
`
`2
`
`
`
`he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a). Id., ¶¶ 5-6
`
`Mr. Lo has not applied to appear pro hac vice in the last three years in any
`
`other matter before the Board. Id., ¶ 7. Petitioner respectfully submits that it has
`
`shown good cause for the Board to recognize Mr. Lo as counsel pro hac vice
`
`during this proceeding.
`
`Dated: January 4, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`/Brian M. Buroker/
`
`Brian M. Buroker (Reg. No. 39,125)
`Blair A. Silver (Reg. No. 68,003)
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202.955.8500
`bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`bsilver@gibsondunn.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner VIZIO, Inc.
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on January 4, 2017, a true copy of the
`
`foregoing Petitioner VIZIO, Inc.’s Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jason
`
`Lo Under 37 C.F.R § 42.10, including all papers filed therewith, was served upon
`
`the following counsel by filing this document through the PTAB E2E System as
`
`well as e-mailing a copy to: JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com; jbragalone@bcpc-
`
`law.com; nkliewer@bcpc-law.com; tsaad@bcpc-law.com; bkennedy@bcpc-
`
`law.com; rpluta@mayerbrown.com; bpaul@mayerbrown.com;
`
`astreff@mayerbrown.com; alam@mayerbrown.com; jbeaber@mayerbrown.com;
`
`and DDGIPR@mayerbrown.com.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 4, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Brian M. Buroker/
`
`
`
`By:
`
`Brian M. Buroker (Reg. No. 39,125)
`Blair A. Silver (Reg. No. 68,003)
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202.955.8500
`bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`bsilver@gibsondunn.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner VIZIO, Inc.
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
