throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________________
`
`
`
`E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY and
`ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`FURANIX TECHNOLOGIES B.V.,
`Patent Owner
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01838
`Patent 8,865,921
`_________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF MICHAEL W. GLYNN
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Patent Owner Furanix Technologies B.V.
`
`(“Furanix”) respectfully requests the pro hac vice admission of Michael W. Glynn
`
`as backup counsel for Furanix in the current proceedings.
`
`
`
`In support of this motion, a declaration of Michael W. Glynn is submitted as
`
`Exhibit 2002 explaining that he satisfies all the criteria for pro hac vice admission
`
`as set forth in Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7
`
`(Oct. 15, 2013).
`
`1.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Lead counsel, Paul M. Richter, is a registered practitioner.
`
`Dr. Glynn is a litigation attorney experienced in patent cases and is a
`
`member in good standing of the New York and Connecticut Bars. He has not had
`
`any application denied for admission to practice, nor has he been sanctioned, cited
`
`for contempt, suspended or disbarred from practice, before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`Dr. Glynn has an established familiarity with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding, including U.S. Pat. No. 8,865,921 (“the ’921 patent”), the
`
`patent’s prosecution history, and all Papers and Exhibits submitted by Petitioners
`
`and Patent Owners in this matter as shown in his accompanying September 18,
`
`2015 Declaration (“Glynn Declaration,” Ex. 2002).
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`
`4.
`
`In his declaration, Dr. Glynn also attests to each of the listed items
`
`required by the Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission – 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10 in IPR2013-00639. Glynn Declaration ¶¶ 1-11 (Ex. 2002).
`
`2.
`
`Conclusions
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Furanix respectfully requests that the Board admit
`
`Michael W. Glynn pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Paul M. Richter /
`Paul M. Richter (Reg. No. 36,254)
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`Tel: 212-425-7200
`Fax: 212-425-5288
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner Furanix
`Technologies B.V.
`
`
`
`Dated: September 18, 2015
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing “MOTION FOR PRO
`
`HAC VICE ADMISSION OF MICHAEL W. GLYNN” was served via email as
`
`follows:
`
`Michael S. Marcus
`Reg. No. 31,727
`DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
`1825 Eye Street NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Tel (202) 420-3702
`Fax (202) 420-2201
`marcusm@dicksteinshapiro.com
`DuPont.IPR@dicksteinshapiro.com
`
`
`Dated: September 18, 2015
`
`/ Paul M. Richter /
`Paul M. Richter
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner Furanix
`Technologies B.V.
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket