`E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. and
`Acher-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Furanix Technologies BV
`IPR2015-01838
`
`
`
`I, Mark A. Chapman, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner at the firm Kenyon & Kenyon LLP, where my practice
`
`focuses on patent—related matters, and in particular, patent litigation in a Variety of
`
`technical fields.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of New York and am
`
`also admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Southern
`
`Districts of New York, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the
`
`U.S. Supreme Court.
`
`3.
`
`I have over 15 years’ experience in the field of patent law as an
`
`associate and a partner at Kenyon & Kenyon LLP. My practice focuses on patent
`
`litigation in district courts around the country, appeals at the Federal Circuit, and
`
`assisting with related Patent Office proceedings, such as reexaminations. For
`
`example, in the past several years, I have been involved in, inter alia, the following
`
`district court patent litigations,Federal Circuit patent appeals, and Patent Office
`
`reexaminations:
`
`a. Reexamination Control No. 95/002,256, and related Appeal No. 2015 —
`
`006,l33 (P.T.A.B.).
`
`b. Reexamination Control No. 95/001,504.
`
`c. Reexamination Control No. 95/001,630.
`
`
`
`
`
`d. Meclinol Ltd. v. Corclis Corp, No. 13—CV—1408 (S.D.N.Y.), and
`
`related Appeal No. 2015-1027 (Fed. Cir.).
`
`e. Yissum Research Dev. Co. v. Sony Corp, Appeal Nos. 15-1342, 15-
`
`1343 (Fed. Cir.) (from P.T.A.B. decisions in IPR2013—00219,
`
`IPR20l3—00218, IPR2013—0O327, and IPR2013—00328).
`
`f. UUSI Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLC, N0. 13-CV—l0444 (E.D. Mich.).
`
`g. Sorias v. National Cellular USA, Inc., No. 14-CV—2897 (E.D.N.Y.).
`
`h. Monkeymedia Inc. v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment Inc. , No. 10-
`
`CA—533 (W.D. Tex.).
`
`4.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have not been denied admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have never been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro lzac vice for any proceeding before
`
`the Office in the last three (3) years.
`
`8.
`
`I am familiar with the subj ect matter of this proceeding. I have
`
`reviewed the subject U.S. Patent No. 8,865,921, as well as the petition for inter
`
`partes review and the supporting expert declaration filed by Petitioners in this
`
`
`
`proceeding.
`
`1 have discussed the subject matter of this proceeding with V
`
`representatives of Patent Owner and lead counsel, Paul Richter.
`
`9.
`
`Given my familiarity with the subject matter of this proceeding and
`
`my experience, I have experience and expertise important to representing Patent
`
`Owner Furanix Technologies B.V. in this matter.
`
`10.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`11.
`
`I have read and will comply with and be subject to the United States
`
`Patent and Trademark Office Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`
`§§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my knowledge are true and that
`
`all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and filrther
`
`that these statements are made with knowledge that willfiil false statements and the
`
`like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under § 1001 of Title 18 of
`
`the United States Code.
`
`Dated: September 18, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`KENYON & KE
`
`ON LLP
`
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`Tel: 212-425-7200
`
`Fax: 212-425-5288
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
