throbber
rte
`
`
`
`rates 1
`
`Fire
`
`Patented Jan. 1, 1953
`
`3,071,599
`PREPARATHGN 6F HYDROXYB'IETHYL
`FURFURAL
`Ralph A. Hales, West (Ihester, Pa, John W. Le Maistre,
`(Jiaymont, DeL, and George Gtto Orth, lira, Seattle,
`Wasln, assignors to Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.,
`Wilmington, DeL, a corporation of Delaware
`No Drawing. Filed Feb. 25, M59, Ser. No. 7§5,3‘53
`8 Claims. (Cl. Zed-347.8)
`
`This invention relates to the preparation of hydroxy
`methyl furfural and more particularly to an improvement
`in the process of preparing hydroxymethyl furfural by the
`dehydration of hexoses.
`That hydroxyrnethyi furfural is one of the products
`formed when hexoses are subjected to dehydrating condi
`tions is well known in the chemical art and it has been
`proposed repeatedly to utilize this dehydration reaction
`in a commercially practical manner for the production
`of hydroxymethyl furfural. Reference is made, for ex
`ample, to U.S. Patent No. 2,750,394 wherein the kinetics
`of the reaction are extensively considered and a process
`for carrying out the dehydration of keto hexoses in the
`presence of aqueous solutions of lower aliphatic mono
`hydric alcohols is disclosed and claimed. Acids and acid
`generating salts are known to be useful catalysts for the
`dehydration reaction.
`It is an object of the present invention to provide an
`improved process for converting hexoses to hydroxy
`methyl furfural.
`Another object is to provide a process for converting
`hexoses to hydroxymethyl furfural by catalytic dehydra
`tion in reaction media of low water content.
`A further object is to provide a process for dehydrat
`ing hexoses to hydroxymethyl ‘furfural while avoiding
`the formation and deposition of insoluble humins.
`The above and other objects will become more ap
`parent in the course of the following description of the
`invention and in the appended claims.
`In accordance with the invention, a hexose is converted
`to hydroxymethyl furfural by acid-catalyzed dehydration
`in a reaction medium comprising water and an organic
`liquid containing ketone or ether oxygen. More particu
`larly the organic liquid is selected from the group consist
`ing of acid-stable aliphatic ketones and acid-stable ali
`phatic ethers of normal boiling point no greater than
`about 280° C.
`The process of the invention is applicable to the con
`version of both keto- and aldo-hexoses. Moreover, since
`the dehydration reaction is acid-catalyzed and conducted
`at an elevated temperature, disaccharides and oligosac
`charides which readily hydrolyze to ketoses, aldoses or
`mixture of the two under such conditions, may be em
`ployed as starting materials. Suitable sugars for conver
`sion thus include glucose, fructose, sorbose, mannose,
`sucrose and maltose. There may also be employed mix
`tures rich in sugars, particularly for example, molasses,
`either high test or blackstrap, and starch conversion
`liquors containing dextrose and dextrose polymers.
`Throughout this speci?cation and in the appended claims
`the term hexose will be used to include hexose polymers
`which yield hexoses on acid hydrolysis.
`It is Well known that the conversion of hexoses to
`hydroxymethyl furfural is catalyzed by acids, and acid
`generating or acid~reacting compounds. The catalyst em
`ployed in processes embodying the improvement com
`prising the present invention may thus be an inorganic
`or organic acid such, for example, as hydrochloric acid,
`sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, toluene sulfonic acid or
`acetic acid. Salts of weak bases and strong acids are
`acid-reacting and e?ective as catalysts. Aluminum chlo
`ride, zinc chloride and chromium chloride may be named
`
`2
`as representative of such salts. Furthermore acid-react
`ing salts may be employed in conjunction with acids as
`catalysts for the reaction. The improved process of the
`invention is independent of the particular catalyst selected
`and is applicable in the presence of any of the foregoing
`types which will ‘be generically referred to as acid cat
`alysts.
`As is well recognized in the art the formation of hy
`droxymethyl furfural is only one of several competing re
`actions proceeding when hexoses are subjected to de
`hydration conditions, others of which include the destruc
`tion of formed hydroxymethyl furfural to yield levulinic
`acid, formic acid, humin and colored bodies of undeter
`mined structure. Accordingly any process for preparing
`hydroxymethyl furfural by sugar dehydration includes
`conventional steps for recovering the sought product ‘from
`the reaction mixture. Liquiddiquid extraction processes
`and/or distillation may, for example, ‘be employed.
`Such separation and recovery steps are not part of the
`present invention but practice of the invention results in
`reaction product mixtures which are readily adapted to
`the recovery of high purity hydro-xymethyl furfural.
`As taught in the prior art of sugar dehydration, it is
`frequently advisable to interrupt the conversion to hy
`droxymethyl furfural when only part of the sugar has
`been dehydrated, thus maximizing the yield of product
`based on sugar actually consumed. The unreacted sugars
`after separation of hydroxymethyl furfural may be re
`cycled to the dehydration reactor. The improvement in
`accordance with the present invention may be employed
`in such a recycling process if desired.
`‘
`The before mentioned objects of the invention are ac
`complished by carrying out the acid catalyzed dehydra
`tion step, of an otherwise conventional process for pro~
`ducing hydroxyrnethyl furfural from a hexose, in the
`presence of a medium comprising a mixture which con
`tains from 5% to 70% by weight of water and corre
`spondingly from 30% to 95% by weight of an acid-stable
`aliphatic ketone or an acid-stable aliphatic ether of boil
`ing point no greater than about 280° C. The ether or
`ketone may be acyclic or cyclic and substituted or unsub
`stituted as long as any substituent groups do not render
`the solvent reactive with the acid catalyst or with the
`hexose carbonyl groups. It is not essential that the ke
`tone or ether be miscible with water or with the sugar
`solution formed by the hexose and water of the reaction
`medium. In case immiscibility is encountered vigorous
`agitation is employed during the dehydration reaction to
`maintain intimate contact between the components of the
`reaction medium, the hexose and the acid catalyst.
`Among the ketones and ethers which may be employed
`in accordance with the invention are methyl isobutyl ke
`tone, mesityl oxide, dichlorethyl ether, dioxane, glycol
`monornethyl ether, symmetrical dimethyl dioxane, tetra
`hydropyran, tetrahydro-Z methyl pyran, and the like.
`Preferably the ketone or ether is one with a normal boil
`ing point below 140° C. vFurthermore it is preferred that
`the reaction medium contain at least 50% of the organic
`liquid. A particularly preferred reaction medium is a
`mixture of dioxane and water containing between 65%
`and 90% dioxane.
`The following examples illustrate how the invention is
`employed in the conversion of hexoses to hydroxymethyl
`furfural.
`
`Example I
`C0nversion.~—-A charge consisting of 290 grams p-di
`oxane and 197.2 grams high test molasses, containing
`sugar representing 145 grams hexose and 38.6 grams
`water, together with 0.72 gram aluminum chloride hexa
`hydrate and 0.83 gram hydrochloric acid was reacted in
`29 batches in small tantalum bombs. Each charged
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`70
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1017, Page 1 of 4
`
`

`
`3,071,599
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`3
`bomb was shaken in an oil bath at 195° C. for 87 seconds
`and cooled quickly by immersion in a cold bath. The
`reacted mixtures were combined for analysis and recovery
`of the formed hydroxymethyl furfural. The product
`contained no material insoluble in the reaction medium.
`By analysis with Fehling’s solution after hydrolysis the
`conversion liquor was found to contain 43.6 grams sugar
`indicating that 69.9% of the sugar charged had been
`converted. A portion of the conversion liquor was sub
`jected to a S-stage countercurrent fractionation between
`water and butanol to remove interfering substances and
`the hydroxymethyl furfural determined quantitatively by
`ultraviolet absorption at 2840 angstroms. The amount
`found corresponded to 42.3 grams in the entire product,
`equivalent to 41.7% of the theoretical yield on sugar
`charged to the reaction and 59.7% on the sugar con
`sumed.
`Recovery.——ln the ensuing description all reported
`weights of material in process have been corrected for
`samples removed for analysis and therefore may be re
`ferred to the initial charge Weight of molasses equivalent
`to 145.0 grams hexose. The dioxane was removed by
`distillation under vacuum and the residue (165 grams)
`taken up in 560 grams of water. 27.5 grams of an ad
`' sorbent clay (Super Filtrol) was stirred into the solution,
`which contained some suspended insoluble humin, at
`room temperature and ?ltered to remove insoluble matter.
`The ?lter cake was well washed with water, the washings
`combined with the ?ltrate, and the whole concentrated,
`under vacuum to a residue of 166 grams. The residue
`was partitioned between mesityl oxide and water to sep
`arate sugar (aqueous phase) from the bulk of the hy
`droxymethyl furfural (mesityl oxide phase). The
`aqueous phase was found by analysis to contain 38.7
`grams sugar and 2.6 grams hydroxymethyl furfural and
`was suitable for recycling to the conversion process.
`The mesityl oxide phase was neutralized with 6.5
`' grams of sodium bicarbonate and extracted with water to
`remove the formed sodium salts. The mesityl oxide was
`then taken off under vacuum and the residue diluted with
`water to a weight of 85.5 grams. By analysis this solu
`tion contained 38.6 grams hydroxymethyl furfural. The
`pH of the solution was adjusted to 7.0 with a small
`amount of sodium bicarbonate and gradually added to
`a heated still under vacuum. The distillate weighed
`41.8 grams and was found to contain, by analysis, 35.0
`"grams of hydroxymethyl furfural.
`Thus 82.8% of the
`hydroxymethyl furfural in the conversion liquor was re
`covered in purity of 83.8%. Another 6.1% of the
`formed hydroxymethyl furfural was available to be re
`cycled with the unconverted sugar and was therefore ulti
`mately recoverable.
`Inasmuch as thepresent- invention is concerned only
`with the conversion step of the hydroxymethyl furfural
`process, the remaining illustrative examples will not in
`clude a description of the process for recovering the ?nal
`product from the conversion liquor. The method em
`ployed in Example I above, or other methods readily
`devisable from the known properties of hydroxymethyl
`furfural and related sugar derivatives obtainable as by
`products in dehydration reactions, may be applied to the
`conversion products of any of the examples.
`.
`
`Example II '
`A 400 ml. stainless steel autoclave, equipped with a
`solenoid-operated plunger for agitation was charged with
`80 grams of fructose, 160 grams of dioxane and 25 grams
`of water. The autoclave was immersed in a heated wax
`bath and taken to 180° C. under'agitation in about 15
`minutes, at which time 1.4 ml. of 3.6% hydrochloric
`acid solution was injected into the charge under nitrogen
`pressure. After 4 minutes at temperature the auto
`clave was cooled quickly to terminate the reaction by
`transferring to a cold ethylene glycol bath. The auto
`clave was opened and the contents were mixed with those
`
`65
`
`70
`
`Water .._‘- _______________ __. 34%. '
`7
`Catalyst ________________ _. AlCl3-6H2O, 0.22%.
`Reaction conditions ...... __ 3 minutes at 210° "C.
`Sugar remaining _________ __ 20.8%.
`HMF (on sugar charged) ___ 41.6% of theory. .
`HMF (on sugar consumed) _. 52.5% of theory.
`
`4
`of another run made in the same manner. The mixture
`of the two runs was subjected to analysis. No insoluble
`humins were present. The conversion liquor contained
`unreacted sugar in amount, corresponding to 16.3% of
`that originally charged and hydroxymethyl furfural in
`amount corresponding to 57.3% of the theoretical yield
`based on hexose charged to the autoclave. Based on
`sugar reacted, the yield of hydroxymethyl furfural was
`68.5% of theory.
`Further illustrating the invention are the following
`examples, all of which were carried out in sealed glass
`tube reactors. The general procedure was to charge ap
`proximately 1 gram of the named sugar together with the
`indicated amounts of solvents and catalyst, each expressed
`as a percentage of the hexose (or hexose equivalent),
`into a glass tube. The tube was immersed in a bath of
`molten wax at the indicated temperature, shaken there
`for the indicated length of time and transferred to a
`bath of cold ethylene glycol to terminate the reaction.
`The cooled tube was then opened and the contents
`analyzed for sugar and hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF)
`contents from which the yields, percent of theory based
`on hexose charged and hexose consumed, were calculated.
`Example III
`
`Hexose source _________ __ Sorbose (taken as 100%).
`Organic liquid _________ .._ Glycol monomethyl ether,
`96%.
`Water __________ __' ____ __ 132%.
`Catalyst ______________ __ Sulfuric acid, 1.0%.
`Reaction conditions ____ __ 3 minutes at 180° C.
`Sugar remaining _______ __ 21.6%.
`HMF (on sugar charged) _.. 52.1% of theory.
`HMF (on sugar con
`sumed) ____________ __ 66.4% of theory.
`Example IV
`
`Hexose source _________ __ Sorbose (taken as 100%).
`Organic liquid _________ __ Dichlorethyl ether, 99%.
`Water ________________ __ 132%.
`Catalyst ______________ __ Sulfuric acid, 1%.
`Reaction conditions ____ __ 1.8 minutes at 180° C.
`Sugar remaining _______ __ 20.5%.
`HMF (on sugar charged) __ 52.2% of theory.
`HMF (on sugar con
`sumed) ____________ _.. 65.7% of theory.
`
`.
`
`Example V
`
`Hexose source ________ __ Sorbose (taken as 100% ).
`Organic liquid _________ _. Methyl isobutyl ketone, 96%.
`Water _______________ __ 132%.
`Catalyst ______________ __. Sulfuric acid, 1%.
`Reaction conditions ____ __ 3.0 minutes at 180° C.
`Sugar remaining _______ _.. 18.5 % .
`HMF (on sugar charged) _ 52.5 % of theory.
`(on sugar consumed) 64.4% of theory.
`Example VI
`Hexose source __________ __ Sorbose (taken as,100%).
`Organic liquid ___________ _. Mesityl oxide, 152%.
`Water __________________ _. 80%.
`Catalyst ________________ _. Hydrochloric acid, 0.25%.
`Reaction conditions ______ __ 2.0 minutes at 180° C.
`Sugar remaining _________ __ 25.5%.
`HMF (on sugar charged) __-. 56.4% of theory.
`HMF (on sugar consumed) _. 75.7% of theory.
`Example VII
`Hexose source __________ __ Glucose (taken as 100%).
`Organic liquid ___________ _. Dioxane, 208%.
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1017, Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`,
`
`5
`
`Example VIII
`
`.,
`
`3,071,599
`
`6 .
`Example XIII
`
`Hexose source g;____ 'Glucose (taken as 100%).
`Organic liquid __.____. Sym. dimethyl dioxane, 159%.
`Water ____________ ... 82%.
`Catalyst __________ __ AlCl3-6H2O—0.22%; HCl, 0.12%.
`Reaction conditions ._ 2.5 minutes at 210° C.
`Sugar remaining ___.... 21.1%.
`HMF (on s u g a r
`charged) _______ _. 40.9% of theory.
`HMF (on sugar con
`sumed) _________ _. 51.8% of theory.
`
`5
`
`Hexose source _______ __ Sorbose (taken as 100%).
`Organic liquid ________ _. Triethylene glycol, 201%.
`Water __________ _.V_____ 36%.
`Catalyst _____________ _. HCl, 0.13%.
`Reaction conditions _____ 3 minutes at 180° C.
`Sugar remaining ______ _- 16.4%.
`H M F (o n s u g a 1'
`charged) _________ __ 66.9% of theory.
`I-IMF (on sugar con~
`sumed) __________ __ 80.0% of theory.
`
`Example IX
`
`Hexose source _.2 ____ __ Sucrose (hexose equiv. taken
`as 100% ).
`Organic liquid __.__‘_____. Dioxane, 195%.
`
`Water ______________ __ 35%.
`.
`Catalyst _____________ _. CrCl3'6H2O, 0.24%; HCl,
`0.12%.
`Reaction conditions _____ 4 minutes at 210° C.
`Sugar remaining ______ _. 17.4%.
`H M F (o n s u g a r
`charged) _________ .._ 46.8% of theory.
`HMF (on sugar con
`sumed) __________ __ 56.6% of theory.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`It is to be emphasized that the improvement in con_
`version of hexoes to hydroxymethyl furfural in accord
`ance with the invention is effected by virtue of the com
`position of the reaction medium. The absolute values
`of extent of conversion and yield of hydroxymethyl
`furfural Will vary with the choice of sugar, catalyst, and
`reaction conditions but ‘by employing the water-organic
`liquid reaction medium ‘as above-de?ned and illustrated
`in place of prior art reaction media such, for example,
`as Water or aqueous alcohol mixtures, the improved re
`sults will be obtained.
`In general, when employing the reaction media of
`the invention it is possible to work with higher sugar
`concentrations than was considered desirable in the prior
`art with concomitant savings in processing costs. A pre
`'ferred range of sugar concentrations in the interest of
`maximum yield of hydroxymethyl furfural and avoid
`ance of undue dilution is from 25% to 40% by weight
`of the total conversion liquor. At concentrations higher
`than 50% there is a marked decrease in hydroxymethyl
`furfural yield for any given sugar consumption and it is
`preferred to avoid such high concentrations.
`Choice of catalyst, amount of catalyst, nature of the
`sugar, reaction temperature and reaction time all interact
`in determining the amount of sugar reacted in a conver
`‘sion cycle. At temperature below about 150° C. con
`version is unduly slow and it is therefore considered
`advisable to work above that temperature. At tempera
`tures above about 220° C. thermal degradation other
`than the desired dehydration increases markedly and such
`temperatures should be avoided. A preferred, though not
`highly critical, range is from 180° C. to 210° C. In gen
`eral, the ketoses may be economically converted at some
`what lower temperatures than the alidoses or hydrolyza~
`ble disaccharides.
`As has been noted by prior investigators, as the amount
`of sugar converted in ‘a single cycle increases, the yield
`of hydroxymethyl iurfural based on sugar consumed de
`creases. The choice of extent of conversion per pass thus
`involves a balancing of the cost of recovering and re
`cycling larger amount of unreacted sugar against the cost
`of letting more of the sugar go to unwanted by-products
`instead of to hydroxymethyl furfural. Employing a re
`action medium as disclosed and claimed in the present
`invention permits carrying the conversion ‘further before
`the hydroxy-methyl 'furfural yield drops to an uneconomi
`cally low value than when employing the aforesaid prior
`art reaction media.
`Adjustment of the several reacting conditions to the
`optimum value when employing the principle of the in
`vention is well within the skill of the chemical art having
`regard 'to the foregoing description and illustrative
`examples.
`What is claimed is:
`1. In the process of preparing hydroxymethyl furfural
`by the acid catalyzed dehydration of a hexose at elevated
`temperature the improvement which comprises carrying
`out the said acid catalyzed dehydration step in the pres
`ence of ‘a reaction medium consisting essentially of from
`50% :to 90% :by Weight of dioxane and correspondingly
`from 10% to 50% by weight of water in the temperature
`range of ‘150° C. to 220° C., the concentration of hexose
`
`Example X
`
`Hexose source _______ __ Sucrose (hexose equiv. taken
`as 100% ).
`Organic liquid ________ _. Tetrahydro - 2 - methyl furan,
`164%.
`Water ______________ __ 80%.
`Catalyst _____________ _. AlCl3-6H2O, 0.22%; HCl,
`0.12%.
`Reaction conditions _____- 2.0 minutes‘ ‘at 210° C.
`Sugarremaining ______ _. 18.5%.
`H M F (0 n s u g a r
`charged) _________ __ 43.8% of theory.
`HMF (on sugar con~
`sumed) __________ __ 53.7% of theory.
`
`Exam'ple XI
`
`Hexose source _______ __ Mixed 1 (hexose equiv. taken
`as 100% ).
`Organic liquid ________ _. Dioxane, 131%.
`Water ______________ __ 36%.
`Catalyst _____________ _.'AlCl3-6H2O, 0.45%; HCl,
`0.50%.
`Reaction conditions __-__ 1.8 minutes at 210° C.
`Sugar remaining ______ _. 20.8%.
`H M F (o n s u g a 1'
`charged) _________ __ 51.0% of theory.
`HMF (on sugar con
`sumed) __________ __ 64.4% of theory.
`1High test molasses plus sugar recovered from a prior
`high test molasses conversion. The recovered sugar repre
`sented 30% of the total.
`
`Example XII
`
`Hexose source _______ __ Sucrose (hexose equiv. taken
`as 100% ).
`Organic liquid ________ _. Dioxane, 152%.
`Water ________ __,______ 78%.
`Catalyst _____________ _. AlCl3-6H2O, 1.35%; HCl,
`0.18%.
`Reaction conditions _____ 23 minutes at 150° C.
`Sugar remaining ______ _. 27.1%.
`H M F (o n s u g a r
`charged) _________ .._ 40.2% of theory.
`HMF (on sugar con
`sumed) __________ __ 55.2% of theory.
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`70
`
`75
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1017, Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`3,071,599
`
`in the reaction charge lying between the inclusive limits
`of 25% and 50%.
`2. The process of claim 1 wherein the hexose is a
`ketose.
`3. The process of claim 2 wherein the catalyst is a
`mineral acid.
`4. The process of claim 1 wherein the hexose is hy
`drolyzed sucrose.
`5. The process of claim 4 wherein the catalyst is a
`mixture of hydrochloric acid and aluminum chloride.
`6. In the process of preparing hydroxymethyl furfural
`by the acid catalyzed dehydration of ‘a hexose at elevated
`temperature the improvement which comprises carrying
`out the dehydration in ‘a reaction medium comprising a
`mixture which contains from 5% to 70% by weight of
`water and correspondingly from 30% to 95% by Weight
`of an organic liquid selected from the Igroup consisting
`of dioxane, mesityl oxide, ‘glycol monomethyl ether, di
`chlorethyl ether, methyl isobutyl ketone, dimethyl di
`oxane, tetrahy-dromet‘hyl ‘?unan and triethylene glycol.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`..
`8
`7. The improved process of claim 6 wherein the said
`organic liquid is. dioxane.
`8. The improved process of ,claim 6 wherein the said ‘
`organic liquid is mesityl oxide.
`
`References Cited in the ?le of this patent
`UNITED STATES PATENTS
`Haworth ____________ ._ Feb. 28, 1950
`Penniston _______ _‘_______ June 16, 1956
`
`2,498,918
`2,750, 394
`
`OTHER REFERENCES
`Dunlop: “The Furans,” page 410, Reinhold Publish
`ing Corp. (1953).
`Fieser: “Organic Chemistry,” (Third Edition, 1956),v
`page 133.
`.
`Weissberger: Technique of Organic Chemistry, vol.
`III, pt. 1 (1956), page 302.
`.
`.' "
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1017, Page 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket