throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 52
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`Entered: November 23, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS VIII, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01835 (Patent 8,618,135 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01836 (Patent 7,932,268 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, LORA M. GREEN, and
`GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are the same in the identified cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are authorized to use this style heading when filing a single paper in
`the listed proceedings, provided that such heading includes a footnote
`attesting that “the word-for-word identical paper is filed in each proceeding
`identified in the heading.”
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01835 (Patent 8,618,135 B2)
`IPR2015-01836 (Patent 7,932,268 B2)
`
`
`Petitioner, Coalition for Affordable Drugs, VIII, LLC, and Patent
`Owner, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, have requested for
`oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 42 and 40.2 The requests
`are granted. Oral arguments will commence at 2:00 PM Eastern Time on
`December 1, 2016, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany
`Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`Each party will have one hour to present arguments. Petitioner bears
`the ultimate burden of proof that the claims at issue in this review are
`unpatentable. Patent Owner bears the burden of proof with respect to its
`Motion to Amend. Petitioner will open the hearing by presenting its case
`regarding the challenged claims for which the Board instituted trial. Patent
`Owner will then respond to Petitioner’s arguments and also argue in support
`of its Motion to Amend.
`Each party may reserve time to respond to arguments presented by the
`other party with some limitations. More specifically, to the extent that
`Petitioner reserves time, it may respond only to Patent Owner’s presentation
`on all matters. To the extent that Patent Owner reserves time, it may
`respond only to Petitioner’s arguments opposing the Motion to Amend.
`The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that
`will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The Board will
`provide a court reporter, and the transcript shall constitute the official record
`of the hearing.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at
`least five business days before the hearing. The Board requests that such
`
`
`2 The paper numbers refer to the paper numbers in IPR2015-01835.
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01835 (Patent 8,618,135 B2)
`IPR2015-01836 (Patent 7,932,268 B2)
`
`exhibits be filed at the Board at least five business days before the hearing.
`The parties must file any objections to the demonstratives with the Board at
`least two business days before the hearing. Any objection to demonstrative
`exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered waived. The
`objections should identify with particularity which demonstratives are
`subject to objection, and include a short (one sentence or less) statement of
`the reason for each objection. The Board asks the parties to confine
`demonstrative exhibit objections to those identifying egregious violations
`that are prejudicial to the administration of justice. The Board will reserve
`ruling on the objections until after the oral argument. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27,
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits. The parties are reminded that the demonstratives do
`not constitute evidence, but are only aids to oral argument. The parties are
`reminded further that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically
`each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced
`during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s
`transcript.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`at the oral hearing. Any counsel of record, however, may present the party’s
`argument. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be
`attending the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone
`conference with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01835 (Patent 8,618,135 B2)
`IPR2015-01836 (Patent 7,932,268 B2)
`
`
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be honored
`unless presented in a separate communication directed to the above email
`address not less than five days before the hearing.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that oral arguments in this proceeding shall take place
`beginning at 2:00 PM Eastern Time on December 1, 2016, on the ninth floor
`of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01835 (Patent 8,618,135 B2)
`IPR2015-01836 (Patent 7,932,268 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Gregory Gonsalves
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com
`
`Christopher Casieri
`chris@miplaw.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`William James
`wjames@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Cynthia Hardman
`chardman@goodwinprocter.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket