throbber
European Journal of Pharmacology 431 2001 127–131
`Ž.
`
`www.elsevier.comrlocaterejphar
`
`MTP inhibitor decreases plasma cholesterol levels in LDL
`receptor-deficient WHHL rabbits by lowering the VLDL secretion
`Masashi Shiomi), Takashi Ito
`Institute for Experimental Animals, Kobe UniÕersity School of Medicine, 7-5-1, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
`Received 28 June 2001; received in revised form 19 September 2001; accepted 25 September 2001
`
`Abstract
`To examine whether a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein MTP -inhibitor is effective in patients with homozygous familial
`Ž.
`hypercholesterolemia, we administered 2S -2-cyclopentyl-2- 4- 2,4-dimethyl-9H-pyrido 2,3-b indol-9-yl methyl phenyl -N- 1S -2-hy-
`Ž.
`
`.
`4
`wŽ
`wŽ.
`w
`x
`x
`droxy-1-phenylethyl ethanamide Implitapide , a new MTP inhibitor, to low-density lipoprotein LDL -receptor-deficient Watanabe
`.
`Ž.

`x
`heritable hyperlipidemic WHHL rabbits at doses of 3, 6, and 12 mgrkg for 4 weeks. In the 12 mgrkg group, the plasma cholesterol and
`Ž.
`triglyceride levels were decreased by 70% and 45%, respectively, and the very low-density lipoprotein VLDL secretion rate was
`Ž.
`decreased by 80%. The composition of newly secreted VLDL was similar in each group. This suggests that Implitapide diminished the
`number of VLDL particles secreted from the liver. Although the ratio of vitamin ErLDL was not altered by Implitapide, triglyceride
`accumulation and a decrease in vitamin E were observed in the liver. In conclusion, an inhibition of VLDL secretion led to a decrease of
`plasma LDL in WHHL rabbits, and MTP inhibitors should have hypolipidemic effects against homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
`q2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`Keywords: MTP inhibitor; Implitapide; VLDL very low-density lipoprotein secretion; Hypolipidemic effect; WHHL, rabbit
`Ž.
`
`1. Introduction
`In patients with homozygous familial hypercholes-
`terolemia, especially low-density lipoprotein LDL -recep-
`Ž.
`tor null
`type,
`therapy using inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-
`methylglutaryl coenzyme A HMG-CoA reductase statin ,
`Ž.

`.
`which competitively inhibits cholesterol biosynthesis and
`increase the LDL-receptor function, has almost no effect.
`To reduce the plasma cholesterol levels of homozygous
`familial hypercholesterolemia, reduction in the secretion of
`very low-density lipoprotein VLDL -cholesterol from the
`Ž.
`liver may be one of the important approaches.
`Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein MTP plays an
`Ž.
`important role in the assembly of VLDL particles in the
`liver and of chylomicron particles in the intestine Wet-

`terau et al., 1992; Sharp et al., 1993; Sorbera et al., 2000 .
`.
`In vitro studies have demonstrated that if the assembly of
`VLDL is suppressed, secretion of the lipoproteins is re-
`
`duced Jamil et al., 1996; Gruetzmann et al., 2000 . The
`Ž.
`main mechanisms of hypolipidemic effects of MTP in-
`hibitors are largely different from inhibitors for HMG-CoA
`reductase. Therefore, MTP inhibitors have the possibility
`of lowering the plasma cholesterol levels of patients with
`homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.
`Recently, Wetterau et al. 1998 reported the effect of
`Ž.
`an MTP inhibitor on lipoprotein lipid levels and the
`triglyceride secretion rate using rats and hamsters. They
`also showed an MTP inhibitor that normalized the plasma
`lipid levels of homozygous Watanabe heritable hyperlipi-
`demic WHHL rabbits, which is an LDL receptor-defi-
`Ž.
`cient animal model Tanzawa et al., 1980; Kita et al.,

`1981 . There are no original studies reporting whether
`.
`MTP inhibitors suppress secretion of VLDL particles from
`the liver in vivo. Therefore, we attempted to examine the
`effects of an MTP inhibitor on the VLDL secretion rate,
`lipoprotein levels, and plasma vitamin E levels in homozy-
`gous WHHL rabbits, using another MTP inhibitor 2S -2-
`Ž.
`cyclopentyl-2- 4- 2,4-dimethyl-9H-pyrido 2,3-b indol-
`
`w Ž
`x
`w
`9-yl methyl phenyl -N-
`1S -2-hydroxy-1-phenylethyl
`4
`w Ž.
`.
`x
`x
`ethanamide Implitapide Sorbera et al., 2000 .
`Ž.

`.
`0014-2999r01r$ - see front matter q2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`PII: S0014-2999 01 01419-4
`Ž.
`
`) Corresponding author. Tel.: q81-78-382-5660; fax: q81-78-382-
`5679.
`E-mail address: ieakusm@med.kobe-u.ac.jp M. Shiomi .
`Ž.
`
`CFAD Ex. 1033 (1 of 5)
`
`

`
`128
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Materials
`
`)
`(
`M. Shiomi, T. ItorEuropean Journal of Pharmacology 431 2001 127–131
`concentration was measured enzymatically and the protein
`concentration was determined by the method of Lowry et
`al. 1951 . The increased rate of VLDL was calculated by
`Ž.
`dividing the difference between the VLDLs obtained be-
`fore and at 6 h after the Triton injection by 6 h.
`
`Implitapide was provided by Bayer Yakuhin Osaka,

`Japan . Triton WR-1339 4- 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl phe-
`.Ž

`.
`nol polymer with formaldehyde and oxirane was pur-
`.
`chased from Nakarai Tesque Tokyo, Japan .
`Ž.
`
`2.2. Animals
`
`Twenty male homozygous WHHL rabbits Shiomi et

`al., 1992 aged 6 months were divided into four groups,
`.
`i.e., a placebo group and Implitapide-treated groups admin-
`istered daily doses of 3, 6, and 12 mgrkg, respectively.
`Implitapide was suspended in 0.5% methylcellulose every
`day and was administered to WHHL rabbits orally for 4
`weeks. All animal experimentation and care were con-
`ducted according to the Guidelines of Animal Experimen-
`tation of Kobe University.
`
`2.3. Fractionation of plasma lipoprotein and measurement
`of lipid leÕels
`
`After overnight fasting, blood samples were taken every
`week from the marginal ear vein. The plasma lipid levels
`were measured every week by enzymatic methods. Before
`and at the end of the treatment, lipoprotein was fraction-
`ated by ultracentrifugation to yield the following fractions:
`VLDL d-1.006 grml , intermediate-density lipoprotein
`Ž.
`IDL, 1.006-d-1.019 grml , LDL 1.019-d-1.063
`Ž.

`grml , and high-density lipoprotein HDL, d)1.063
`.Ž
`grml .
`.
`
`2.4. Determination of VLDL secretion rate
`
`At the end of Implitapide treatment, we determined the
`VLDL secretion rate Shiomi et al., 1994; Shiomi and Ito,

`1994 . The VLDL secretion rate was determined by intra-
`.
`venous injection of Triton WR-1339 after overnight fasting
`to eliminate the influence of chylomicrons. It was reported
`that Triton WR-1339 blocks degradation of VLDL Shotz

`et al., 1957; Borenztajn et al., 1976 and that the VLDL
`.
`secretion rate determined by a Triton injection reflects well
`the secretion rate of VLDL in vivo Guettet et al., 1989;

`Maeda et al., 1993 . In addition, the apolipoprotein B of
`.
`liver perfusates was contained almost exclusively in VLDL
`in WHHL rabbits Yamada et al., 1987 . Prior to Triton
`Ž.
`injection, Implitapide was administered to rabbits in the
`treated group. Triton WR-1339 at 200 mgrml in 0.15 M
`NaCl solution was injected into an ear vein at a dose of
`400 mgrkg body weight. Before and at 6 h after Triton
`injection, blood samples were obtained and the VLDL
`fraction was prepared by ultracentrifugation. The lipid
`
`2.5. Measurement of plasma Õitamin E leÕels
`
`Before and at the end of the Implitapide administration,
`the vitamin E levels were measured in the plasma samples
`by analysis in a commercial
`laboratory SRL, Tokyo,

`Japan . Vitamin E was extracted with hexane, and a-, b-,
`.
`and g-tocopherol were separated and measured by high-
`performance liquid chromatography employing a column
`Ž.Unisil Q NH , GL Science, Tokyo, Japan and a spectro-
`2
`fluorometer FP-821, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan .
`Ž.
`
`2.6. Measurement of lipid contents in the liÕer
`
`After the Triton experiment, rabbits were anesthetized
`by an intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital 25

`mgrkg and perfused with saline solution. After the perfu-
`.
`sion, the liver was excised. Using 5 g of the tissue, the
`lipid accumulated in the liver was extracted according to
`the method of Folch et al. 1957 . The concentration of
`Ž.
`extracted lipid and vitamin E were determined as described
`above.
`
`2.7. Statistical analysis
`
`Values are presented as the means"SEM. Statistical
`analysis was carried out by Williams–Shirley multiple
`comparison test. Shirley, 1977 .
`Ž.
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Effect of Implitapide on the plasma and lipoprotein
`lipid leÕels
`
`All plasma lipid levels were decreased dose-depen-
`dently by Implitapide treatment. Comparing the highest
`dose group to the placebo group, the decrease in plasma
`lipid levels was 70% P-0.01 for cholesterol 20.4 "1.0
`Ž.

`vs. 6.2 "0.8 mM and 45% P-0.01 for triglyceride
`.Ž
`.
`Ž.2.0 "0.4 vs. 1.1 "0.1 mM . In Fig. 1, each lipoprotein
`containing apolipoprotein-B100 was decreased dose-de-
`pendently by Implitapide treatment. In the highest dose
`group, the VLDL fraction was markedly decreased: the
`decrease was 79% P-0.01 for cholesterol and 65%
`Ž.
`Ž.P-0.05 for triglyceride, and the decrease in the LDL
`fraction was similar to that of the plasma lipid levels.
`However, the HDL-lipid levels did not show significant
`changes.
`
`CFAD Ex. 1033 (2 of 5)
`
`

`
`)
`(
`M. Shiomi, T. ItorEuropean Journal of Pharmacology 431 2001 127–131
`
`129
`
`Fig. 1. Effects of Implitapide on the lipoprotein lipid levels of homozy-
`, 3 mgrkg of Implitapide
`gous WHHL rabbits. I, placebo ns5 ;
`Ž.
`ns5 ;
`, 6 mgrkg of Implitapide ns5 ; and X, 12 mgrkg of
`Ž.
`Ž.
`Implitapide ns5 . Values are presented as means"SEM. Statistical
`Ž.
`analyses were carried out with the Williams–Shirley multiple comparison
`test
`P -0.05; and †P -0.01 vs. placebo group . The plasma choles-
`Ž)
`.
`terol levels were 20"1 mM in the placebo group, 16"1 mM in the 3
`mgrkg group, 13"1 mM in the 6 mgrkg group, and 6"1 mM in the 12
`mgrkg group.
`
`3.2. Effect of Implitapide on VLDL secretion
`The VLDL secretion rate was decreased dose-depen-
`dently Fig. 2 . Using all parameters, the VLDL secretion
`Ž.
`rate of the highest dose group was decreased significantly
`by about 80% P-0.05 or P-0.01 compared with the
`Ž.
`placebo group. Fig. 3 shows the composition of newly
`secreted VLDL at 6 h after Triton injection. Guettet et al.
`1989 and Maeda et al. 1993 reported that VLDL ob-
`Ž.
`Ž.
`tained after injection of Triton WR-1339 more closely
`resembled nascent VLDL rather than circulating VLDL.
`Therefore, VLDL obtained after Triton injection is consid-
`ered newly secreted VLDL. The VLDL composition of
`
`Fig. 3. Effects of Implitapide on the lipid composition of the newly
`secreted VLDL of homozygous WHHL rabbits. We analyzed the VLDL
`fraction obtained at 6 h after Triton injection as newly secreted VLDL.
`Values are presented as means"SEM. There were no significant differ-
`ences among the groups ns5 by the Williams–Shirley multiple com-
`Ž.
`parison test.
`
`newly secreted VLDL showed almost no changes in all the
`groups.
`
`3.3. Plasma Õitamin E leÕels
`
`Before the experiment, the plasma a-tocopherol level
`was 64"4 mM ns20 and the b- or g-tocopherol levels
`Ž.
`were below 1 mM. At the end of the treatment Fig. 4 , the
`Ž.
`plasma a-tocopherol level in the highest dosage group was
`decreased by 76% P-0.01 compared with the placebo
`Ž.
`group. The decrease was dose-dependent. However, the
`plasma a-tocopherol level was closely correlated with the
`LDL-cholesterol level
`rs0.8842, P-0.001 . In addi-
`Ž.
`tion,
`the ratio of plasma a-tocopherolrplasma LDL-
`cholesterol was 2.9 "0.3 ns5 in the highest dose group
`Ž.
`at the end of the treatment, and this was similar to the ratio
`
`Fig. 2. Effects of Implitapide on the VLDL secretion rate of homozygous
`, 3 mgrkg of Implitapide ns5 ;
`WHHL rabbits. I, placebo ns5 ;
`Ž.
`Ž.
`, 6 mgrkg of Implitapide ns5 ; and X, 12 mgrkg of Implitapide
`Ž.
`Ž.ns5 . Values are presented as means"SEM. Statistical analyses were
`carried out with the Williams–Shirley multiple comparison test
`P -
`Ž)
`0.05 and †P -0.01 versus placebo group .
`.
`
`Fig. 4. Relation between the plasma a-tocopherol levels and the LDL
`cholesterol levels of homozygous WHHL rabbits treated with Implitapide,
`an MTP inhibitor. e, placebo
`ns5 ;
`, 3 mgrkg of Implitapide
`Ž.
`ns5 ;
`, 6 mgrkg of Implitapide ns5 ; and v, 12 mgrkg of
`Ž.
`Ž.
`Implitapide ns5 . The plasma a-tocopherol levels were 62"4 mM in
`Ž.
`the placebo group, 44"3 mM in the 3 mgrkg group, 31"2 mM in the 6
`mgrkg group, and 15"2 mM in the 12 mgrkg group.
`
`CFAD Ex. 1033 (3 of 5)
`
`

`
`130
`
`)
`(
`M. Shiomi, T. ItorEuropean Journal of Pharmacology 431 2001 127–131
`
`Fig. 5. Accumulation of lipids and a-tocopherol in the livers of homozygous WHHL rabbits treated with Implitapide, an MTP inhibitor. I, placebo
`ns5 ;
`, 3 mgrkg of Implitapide ns5 ;
`, 6 mgrkg of Implitapide ns5 ; and X, 12 mgrkg of Implitapide ns5 . Values are presented as
`Ž.
`Ž.
`Ž.
`Ž.
`means"SEM. Statistical analyses were carried out with the Williams–Shirley multiple comparison test
`P-0.05 and †P-0.01 vs. placebo group .
`Ž)
`.
`
`in each group. This suggests that reduction in the plasma
`a-tocopherol levels by Implitapide was due to the reduc-
`tion in the plasma LDL levels.
`3.4. Lipid accumulation in the liÕer
`Fig. 5 shows accumulation of lipids and a-tocopherol in
`the liver after 4 weeks administration of Implitapide. Al-
`though the cholesterol content was similar in each group,
`the triglyceride accumulation was increased dose-depen-
`dently. In the highest dose group, the triglyceride content
`was about three-fold greater than that of the placebo group.
`In addition, the a-tocopherol content was decreased dose-
`dependently.
`
`4. Discussion
`In this study, we examined whether inhibition of VLDL
`secretion by MTP inhibitor administration could reduce the
`plasma cholesterol levels even in the LDL receptor-defi-
`cient state. We found that 12 mgrkg of Implitapide
`markedly decreased the level of atherogenic apolipo-
`protein-B100-containing lipoproteins and the VLDL secre-
`tion rate in homozygous WHHL rabbits. This suggests that
`a potent inhibition of VLDL secretion led to a marked
`decrease in LDL in the plasma even in the LDL-receptor
`deficient state.
`A previous study by Wetterau et al. 1998 reported the
`Ž.
`effect of another MTP inhibitor on the triglyceride secre-
`tion rate but not on the VLDL secretion rate. Implitapide
`reduced the VLDL secretion rate by about 80%, using not
`only cholesterol as an index but also triglyceride or protein
`as an index, and did not affect the VLDL composition.
`These results suggest that Implitapide decreased the num-
`ber of VLDL particles secreted from the liver. This is a
`novel observation in vivo, although in vitro studies demon-
`strated that MTP inhibitors reduced apolipoprotein-B se-
`cretion from HepG2 cells by an inhibition in the assembly
`of VLDL particles
`Jamil et al., 1996; Wetterau et al.,

`1998 . The present findings suggest that the potent hy-
`.
`polipidemic effect of Implitapide was mainly due to sup-
`pression of VLDL particle secretion from the liver.
`
`the hypolipidemic effects of
`In the statin treatment,
`statins are mainly the induction of the LDL-receptor func-
`tion in patients with normal LDL-receptor function. In
`WHHL rabbit studies using statins,
`the hypolipidemic
`effects were due to an induction of LDL-receptor mRNA
`Ž.Kuroda et al., 1992 and a reduction of cholesterol content
`in the VLDL secreted from the liver Shiomi et al., 1994;

`Shiomi and Ito, 1994 . In this latter case, the secretion of
`.
`VLDL-triglyceride was not affected despite the reduction
`in the secretion of VLDL-cholesterol. Although the reduc-
`tion in VLDL-cholesterol secretion was about 20% in the
`statin-treated WHHL rabbits Shiomi et al., 1994; Shiomi

`and Ito, 1994 , Implitapide 12 mgrkg deceased the
`.Ž
`.
`VLDL secretion by about 80% in the present study. Impli-
`tapide was very efficient
`in the suppression of VLDL
`secretion compared with statin treatments. Therefore, this
`compound has the possibility of being an effective agent
`for patients with homozygous
`familial hypercholes-
`terolemia, although statins have almost no effects.
`Wetterau et al. 1998 and Sorbera et al. 2000 reported
`Ž.
`Ž.
`MTP inhibitors decreased HDL levels. In the present study,
`the HDL cholesterol level did not show any significant
`decrease. Although we have no findings to explain this
`disagreement, this difference may be due to the very low
`HDL levels in WHHL rabbits compared with normal
`rabbits.
`The plasma vitamin E levels were decreased by the
`MTP inhibitor treatment. This decrease was due to a
`reduction in LDL. It is well known that vitamin E binds to
`lipoproteins Cohn et al., 1992 . The ratio of vitamin
`Ž.
`ErLDL-cholesterol did not decrease in the present study.
`In addition, the plasma vitamin E level of age-matched
`normal rabbits was about one-third of the highest dose
`group of the present study data not shown . This suggests
`Ž.
`that MTP inhibitors do not
`interfere with antioxidative
`effects on LDL particle.
`In the present study, we did not examine any side
`effects of Implitapide because the purpose of this study
`was to examine the effects on the VLDL secretion and
`lipoprotein levels in the LDL-receptor deficient state. In
`the experimental period, no rabbits show steatorrhoea or
`other clinical findings, and there were no significant differ-
`
`CFAD Ex. 1033 (4 of 5)
`
`

`
`)
`(
`M. Shiomi, T. ItorEuropean Journal of Pharmacology 431 2001 127–131
`ences in food consumption or body weight changes in each
`group. However, in examination of lipid accumulation in
`the liver, Implitapide showed a dose-dependent increase in
`the triglyceride levels and a dose-dependent decrease in
`the a-tocopherol levels despite the normal external appear-
`ance. Since the liver triglyceride content of hamsters treated
`with another MTP inhibitor was increased temporally
`Ž.Wetterau et al., 1998 , it may be inappropriate to conclude
`that the present 4 weeks treatment demonstrates that Impli-
`tapide treatment causes fatty liver. At
`the dose of 3
`mgrkg, Implitapide decreased plasma cholesterol levels by
`23% 20.4 "1.0 vs. 15.7 "0.5 mM, Ps0.003 by Stu-

`dent’s t-test . At
`this dose,
`the liver triglyceride and
`.
`a-tocopherol levels did not show any significant changes
`compared with the placebo group. Although Implitapide
`showed potent hypolipidemic effects, it is important to
`select a safe dose and to measure activities of plasma
`enzymes, which reflect liver damage.
`It is well known that there are no effective compounds
`to reduce the plasma cholesterol levels of patients with
`homozygous
`familial hypercholesterolemia,
`especially
`LDL-receptor null type. However, the present results sug-
`gest that potent inhibition of VLDL secretion can reduce
`the plasma cholesterol levels of homozygous WHHL rab-
`bits, and MTP inhibitors are thus considered candidates as
`compounds effective for treatment of homozygous familial
`hypercholesterolemia patients.
`
`Acknowledgements
`We acknowledge Bayer Yakuhin for providing Impli-
`tapide. This work was supported in part by a research grant
`from Bayer Yakuhin.
`
`References
`Borenztajn, J., Roune, M.S., Kotlar, T.J., 1976. The inhibition in vivo of
`lipoprotein lipase clearing-factor lipase activity by Triton WR-1339.
`Ž.
`Biochem. J. 156, 539–543.
`Cohn, W., Goss-Sampson, M.A., Grun, H., Muller, D.P.R., 1992. Plasma
`clearance and net uptake of a-tocopherol and low-density lipoprotein
`by tissues in WHHL and control rabbits. Biochem. J. 287, 247–254.
`Folch, J., Lees, M., Sloane-Stanley, G.H., 1957. A simple method for the
`isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol.
`Chem. 226, 497–509.
`Gruetzmann, R., Beuck, M., Mueller, U., Nielsch, U., 2000. Bay 13-9952
`Ž.Implitapide , an inhibitor of the microsomal
`triglyceride transfer
`protein MTP , blocks secretion of apo-B-lipoproteins. Atherosclero-
`Ž.
`sis 151 Suppl. 91–92 Abstract .
`Ž.

`.
`Guettet, C., Mathe, D., Navarro, N., Lecuyer, B., 1989. Effects of chronic
`glucagons administration on rat lipoprotein composition. Biochim.
`Biophys. Acta 1005, 233–238.
`Jamil, H., Gordon, D.A., Eustice, D.C., Brooks, C.M., Dickson Jr., J.K.,
`Chen, Y., Ricci, B., Chu, C.H., Harrity, T.W., Ciosek Jr., C.P., Biller,
`
`131
`
`S.A., Gregg, R.E., Wetterau, J.R., 1996. An inhibitor of the microso-
`mal triglyceride transfer protein inhibits apoB secretion from HepG2
`cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 11991–11995.
`Kita, T., Brown, M.S., Watanabe, Y., Goldstein, J.L., 1981. Deficiency of
`low density lipoprotein receptors in liver and adrenal gland of the
`WHHL rabbit, an animal model of familial hypercholesterolemia.
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 2268–2272.
`Kuroda, M., Matsumoto, A., Itakura, H., Watanabe, Y., Ito, T., Shiomi,
`M., Fukushige, J., Nara, F., Fukami, M., Tsujita, Y., 1992. Effects of
`pravastatin sodium alone and in combination with cholestyramine on
`hepatic, intestinal and adrenal low density lipoprotein receptors in
`homozygous Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Jpn. J. Phar-
`macol. 59, 65–70.
`Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J., 1951. Protein
`measurement with Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.
`Maeda, E., Yoshino, G., Matsuba, M., Nagata, K., Morita, M., Murata,
`Y., Naka, Y., Kazumi, T., 1993. Effect of a 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-
`glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor on triglyceride kinetics in
`chronically streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Metabolism 42, 1–8.
`Sharp, D., Blinderman, L., Combs, K.A., Kienzle, B., Ricci, B., Wager-
`Smith, K., Gil, C.M., Turck, C.W., Bouma, M.E., Rader, D.J.,
`Aggerbeck, L.P., Gregg, R.E., Gordon, D.A., Wetterau, J.R., 1993.
`Cloning and gene defects in microsomal triglyceride transfer protein
`associated with abetalipoproteinaemia. Nature 365, 65–69.
`Shiomi, M., Ito, T., 1994. Pravastatin sodium, a competitive inhibitor of
`hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, decreased
`the cholesterol content of newly secreted very-low-density lipoprotein
`in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Metabolism 43, 559–
`564.
`Shiomi, M., Ito, T., Shiraishi, M., Watanabe, Y., 1992. Inheritability of
`atherosclerosis and the role of lipoproteins as risk factors in the
`development of atherosclerosis in WHHL rabbits: risk factors related
`to coronary atherosclerosis are different from those related to aortic
`atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 96, 43–52.
`Shiomi, M., Shiraishi, M., Yata, T., Ito, T., 1994. Effect of fluvastatin
`sodium on secretion of very low density lipoprotein and serum
`cholesterol levels. Arzneim.-Forsch. 44, 1154–1156.
`Shirley, E., 1977. A non-parametric equivalent of Williams’ test for
`containing increasing dose level of a treatment. Biometrics 33, 386–
`389.
`Shotz, M.C., Scanu, A.M., Page, I.H., 1957. Effect of Triton on lipopro-
`tein lipase of rat plasma. Am. J. Physiol. 188, 399–402.
`Sorbera, L.A., Martin, L., Silvestre, J., Castaner, J., 2000. Implitapide.
`Drugs Future 25, 1138–1144.
`Tanzawa, K., Shimada, Y., Kuroda, M., Tsujita, Y., Arai, M., Watanabe,
`Y., 1980. WHHL-rabbit: a low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient
`animal model for familial hypercholesterolemia. FEBS Lett. 118,
`81–84.
`Wetterau, J.R., Aggerbeck, L.P., Bouma, M.E., Eisenberg, C., Munck,
`A., Hermier, M., Schmitz, J., Gay, G., Rader, D.J., Gregg, R.E.,
`1992. Absence of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in individu-
`als with abetalipoproteinemia. Science 258, 999–1001.
`Wetterau, J.R., Gregg, R.E., Harrity, T.W., Arbeeny, C., Cap, M.,
`Connoly, F., Chu, C.H., George, R.J., Gordon, D.A., Jamil, H.,
`Jolibois, K.G., Kunselman, L.K., Lan, S.J., Maccagnan, T.J., Ricci,
`B., Yan, M., Young, D., Chen, Y., Fryszman, O.M., Logan, J.V.H.,
`Musial, C.L., Poss, M.A., Robl, J.A., Simpkins, L.M., Slusarchyk,
`W.A., Sulsky, R., Taunk, P., Magnin, D.R., Tino, J.A., Lawrence,
`R.M., Dickson, J.K., Biller, S.A., 1998. An MTP inhibitor that
`normalizes atherogenic lipoprotein levels in WHHL rabbits. Science
`282, 751–754.
`Yamada, N., Shames, D.M., Havel, R.J., 1987. Effect of low density
`lipoprotein receptor deficiency on the metabolism of apolipoprotein
`B-100 in blood plasma. J. Clin. Invest. 80, 507–515.
`
`CFAD Ex. 1033 (5 of 5)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket