throbber
l F-~C REPORTS(cid:173)
`
`.. fQUNDED 1939
`$1 ,:i95 A YEAR
`
`''
`

`
`PRESCRIPTION PHARMACEUTICALS AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
`
`F-0-C Reports introduces ...
`
`"The Pink Sheet"
`I
`
`You like it \IIJeekly. You'll love it daily.
`
`Up-to-date pharma/biotcch news- at
`rrom ,your trusted source for
`your desk -
`OYer 6) ye(trs.
`Request your risk-free. 30-day trial now at
`'vww.thcpinkshectdaily.c()H1
`
`THE NEWS THIS WEEK
`
`Vol. 66, No. 7
`
`February 16, 2004
`
`Erbitux Clears FDA; last Big Approval Of McClellan Era?
`• BRISTOL/IMCLONE EXPECT SECOND fRB/TUXMANUFACTURING SITE APPROVAL in July. Colorectal cancer treatment will
`be launched with product from Lonza Biologics facility. Approval is first step in Bristol's turnaround strategy ...................... 3
`
`fRB/TUXSURVIVAL STUDY TO BE SUBMITTED TO FDA BY EARLY 2007, IMCLONE SAYS following accelerated approval
`•
`Feb. 12. Two 1,500-patient studies are expected to complete enrollment in second quarter 2005 and fourth quarter 2006.
`Erbitux review did not require advisory cmmnittee opinion, FDA says, because "the data stood on its own merits" ................ 4
`
`FDA COMMISSIONER McCLELLAN MAY BE MOVING AGENCIES; CMS SPECULATION indicates importance of Medicare Rx
`•
`to Bu'sh Administration. McClellan's background is perfect for CMS, though FDA post is viewed as more attractive .......... 27
`
`• U.S. annual drug spend will reach $520 bil. in 2013, CMS projects, close to triple the expenditure in 2003 ...................... 29
`
`• Pfizer relies on "healthy competition" among research teams to preserve entrepreneurial spirit of discovery
`scientists. Company recognizes "dark side" to scale, tries to preserve spirit of loyalty to "the project." Pfizer does
`not plan sales force cuts, despite what it sees as "invitation" to do so from competitors ................................................... 13
`
`• GSK not interested in making "White Knight" bid for Aventis; company remains confident that internal R&D efforts
`will generate future growth. GSK faces "transition" year in 2004 ....................................................................................... 7
`
`• Aventis/Genta oncologic Genasense is expected to receive advisory committee review in early May ................................... 6
`
`• Hormone therapy "black box" class warning on dementia risk requested by Fr
`Prempro/Premarin already includes a dementia warning, but not a "black box" ....... .
`
`~beling for Wyeth's
`............................... 19
`
`• Wyeth Prevnarallocation plan extended to July; providers will receive 80% of av,f'"
`
`•
`
`"Shared exclusivity" could apply to eight first-time generics over next two years, FL
`
`,. ..,. ...................... 20
`
`..................... 23
`
`• Dr. Reddy's AmVaz approval stayed; FDA re-evaluating source of data supporting competit-. ··
`
`.:; Norvasc ........... 24
`
`• PhRMA close to deal with Rep. Tauzin; communications, reg affairs changes reflect scope of tra11.,1tion process .............. 25
`
`• Merck will give drugs free to Medicare "debit" card qualifiers after their $600 transitional assistance grant is used up.
`Merck/Schering-Plough's Zetia in not included in the offer .............................................................................................. 33
`
`• Medco's cash reserves will give the company flexibility in its approach to the Medicare Rx benefit, firm says ................... 33
`
`• Rx supply chain should be on "code red" for possible counterfeits ahead of April 1 implementation date for paper
`pedigrees, specialty distributor maintains. Dubious products may flood market before pedigree requirement kicks in .... 36
`
`Contents copyrighted © F-D-C Reports, Inc. 2004; protected by U.S. Copyright Law. Reproduction, photocopying, storage or transmission by magnetic or electronic means strictly
`prohibited by law. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by F-D-C Reports, Inc., when the fee of $7.50 per copy of each page is paid directly to
`Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400. The Transaction Reporting Service fee code is: 1530-6240/04 $0.00 + $7.50. Violation of
`copyright will result in legal action, including civil and/or criminal penalties, and suspension of service. For more information contact Michael Magoulias, F-D-C Reports, Inc., at
`301-657-9830.
`
`

`
`"The Pink Sheet,'
`
`17
`
`PPD will adopt Merck/Schering-Plough's Zelia model
`in developing Bayer's implitapide as an add-on therapy
`in the lipid-lowering market, PPD subsidiary MRL
`International CEO Evan Stein, MD/PhD, said.
`
`"We're not looking to compete with the statin market."
`While "no new agent is going to replace statin
`therapy ... we've seen ezetimibe, Zetia, come onto the
`market and obtain a significant market share," Stein
`said during PPD's investor day Feb. 5.
`
`Zetia is similarly targeted. By contrast, Merck expects
`the Zetia/Zocor fixed-dose combination pending at
`FDA to compete directly with single-agent statins for
`patients who are diagnosed with high cholesterol but
`not treated ("The Pink Sheet" Dec. 22, 2003, p. 23).
`
`PPD suggested implitapide could eventually be used as
`a triple combination therapy with Zetia and a statin. In
`that case, Stein estimated that LDL-cholesterol
`reductions could range between 66%-72%.
`
`PPD is conducting Phase II proof-of(cid:173)
`concept studies on the use of implitapide
`(BA Y-13-9952) as an add-on to statin
`therapy. The contract research organization
`licensed the microsomal triglyceride
`transfer protein inhibitor from Bayer.
`
`PPD expects Bayer will be interested in
`buying back rights to implitapide after
`seeing the Phase II results. "If they meet, I
`think, even a reasonable hurdle, Bayer will
`be pretty keen to take it," Stein
`maintained.
`
`Implitapide could
`mark Bayer'sreturn to
`the lipid-lowering
`market after the 2001
`Baycol withdrawalo
`Bayer will have the opportunity to relicense
`PPD is hoping to demonstrate implitapide's safety and
`implitapide from PPD by reimbursing Phase II costs
`efficacy in homozygous and severe heterozygous
`and establishing milestone and royalty payments.
`familial hypercholesterolemia "where even high-dose
`statins are ineffective or inadequate," Stein said. The
`drug is also being studied for hypertriglyceridemia.
`
`The studies, which will enroll approximately 200
`patients, are expected to position the drug as a way to
`improve upon statin therapy, much in the same way
`that Zetia is marketed, Stein said.
`
`"The addition here of another 18% to 24% [LDL
`reduction] would allow us to build on current therapy,"
`he said. Zetia's success "provides an equal opportunity
`for other drugs that can produce 18% to 24% LDL
`reduction safely in a single-dose pill on top of all
`existing therapy."
`
`When used as an add-on to a statin, Zetia has a
`statistically significant effect on reducing LDL
`cholesterol. For example, across all Lipitor
`(atorvastatin) doses the combination reduces LDL
`levels 56% versus 44% with the statin alone.
`
`Some analysts have questioned the pace of Zetia' s
`uptake, however; new and total prescription share in
`December was 5.2% and 4.9%, after a little over a year
`on the market ("The Pink Sheet" Feb. 2, 2004, p. 11).
`
`Patients initially targeted for implitapide therapy will
`likely be the 5%-7% of high cholesterol patients that
`are statin-intolerant and the 10% -15% who are at high
`risk for cardiovascular disease and have not reached
`their LDL goals, Stein indicated.
`
`"One of the things that may drive them is if they don't
`take it, they know a number of other major pharma
`would probably. They are speaking to us and are
`interested in the results," Stein said.
`
`Implitapide would mark Bayer's return to the lipid(cid:173)
`lowering market; the company withdrew the statin
`Baycol (cerivastatin) in 2001 due to reports of
`rhabdomyolysis, including deaths ("The Pink Sheet"
`Aug. 13, 2001, p. 4).
`
`While Stein acknowledged that MTP inhibitor projects
`have been pursued by a number of companies, ·
`including Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson
`and Pfizer, he argued that the toxicity seen with some
`of those projects was related to the high doses used
`during trials
`
`"None of them were looking at LDL reductions or
`cholesterol reductions" as low as the 20% range, he
`said. "They didn't consider that viable in terms of
`marketing. There was no Zetia on the market, so there
`was no model for them."
`
`PPD is conducting three 39-week Phase II studies with
`dose titration occurring every five weeks based on safety
`and tolerability examined at four weeks. The starting
`dose will be 10 mg daily, escalating by 5 mg/day every
`five weeks to a maximum 40 mg/day. + +
`
`Unauthorized photocopying is prohibited by law. See page one.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket