`Case 1:12—cv—OOO30—RGA Document 104 Filed 11/19/13 Page 1 of 4 Page|D #: 2938
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`a Delaware limited liability company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC., a
`
`Delaware corporation, and SIERRA
`WIRELESS, INC., a Canadian corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`___________:____________l
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`a Delaware limited liability company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CINTERION WIRELESS MODULES GMBH,
`a German limited liability company,
`CINTERION WIRELESS MODULES NAFTA
`
`LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
`
`Defendants.
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`a Delaware limited liability company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ENFORA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
`NOVATEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS,
`
`INC., a Delaware corporation, and
`NOVATEL WIRELESS, INC, a
`Delaware corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`C.A. No. 12-030-RGA
`
`C.A. No. 12-031—RGA
`
`C.A. No. 12-032-RGA
`
`
`
`SIERRA WIRELESS 1016
`SIERRA WIRELESS 1016
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00030-RGA Document 104 Filed 11/19/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 2939
`Case 1:12—cv—OOO30—RGA Document 104 Filed 11/19/13 Page 2 of 4 Page|D #: 2939
`
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`a Delaware limited liability company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware
`corporation, TELIT COMMUNICATIONS PLC,
`a United Kingdom public limited company, and
`TELIT WIRELESS SOLUTIONS INC., a
`
`Delaware corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`____________________?__i
`M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
`a Delaware limited liability company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SIMCOM WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO.,
`LTD., a Chinese limited company, SIM
`TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD, a Bermuda
`limited company, MICRON ELECTRONICS
`L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company,
`and KOWATEC CORPORATION, a California
`
`corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
` __:4
`
`C.A. No. 12-033-RGA
`
`C.A. No. 12-034-RGA
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
`
`After having considered the submissions of the parties and hearing oral argument
`
`on the matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that, as used in the
`
`asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,094,010 (“‘010 patent”):
`
`1. The term “permitted caller” is construed to mean “a telephone number or IP
`
`address on a list of numbers that are designated to cause the programmable
`
`
`
`w-~.«~»..:«m~m«#1v;«>:uvex31'»-lévw,1H>6’3€*:4-wfiAsvlmr£$‘wu»<4w‘&1L§a¢fis‘$f9N€~wH£fllW9:azImnwqw=w
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00030-RGA Document 104 Filed 11/19/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 2940
`Case 1:12—cv—OOO30—RGA Document 104 Filed 11/19/13 Page 3 of 4 Page|D #: 2940
`
`communicator to accept an incoming call received from that number.”
`
`The term “coded number” is construed to mean “a designated, unique sequence of
`
`characters.”
`
`The term “a programmable interface” is construed to mean “an interface that is
`
`able to be directly programmed.”
`
`The term “processing module” is construed to mean “components or units of a
`
`computer program.”
`
`The term “monitoring device” is construed to mean “a device configured to
`
`remotely monitor a programmable communicator device and/or a monitored
`
`technical device.”
`
`The term “wireless communications circuit for communicating through an
`
`antenna” is construed to mean “a complete wireless circuit that transmits and
`
`receives data and includes an antenna.”
`
`The term “monitored technical device” is construed to mean “a device that
`
`provides information to the remote monitoring device through the programmable
`
`communicator device.”
`
`Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, as used in claims 92 and 94, the term “a
`
`programmable communicator device .
`
`.
`
`. configured to be incorporated into the at
`
`least one monitored technical device such that it becomes an integrated part of the
`
`monitored technical device” should be construed to mean “a programmable
`
`communicator device configured to be physically embedded within a monitored
`
`technical device so as to form a single device.”
`
`$:e'<«<-,-eievhvurwvo-'xer’I“«n'=reM%azm(afiM=-1-wfirs\1zw»n%«'wFIs1nwrfl4v‘!@69!'!'J’?§1n1V
`
`g.
`5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00030-RGA Document 104 Filed 11/19/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 2941
`Case 1:12—cv—OOO30—RGA Document 104 Filed 11/19/13 Page 4 of 4 Page|D #: 2941
`
`SO ORDERED this
`
`day of M2 (/
`
`, 2013.
`
` UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE