throbber
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PIIARI\IACOLOGY 1999, 50, 5, 777-786
`
`A. SZLACHCIC, Z. SLIWOWSKI, E. KARCZEWSKA, W. BIELANSKI,
`J. PYTKO-POLONCZYK *, S.J. KONTUREK
`
`HELICOBACTER PYLORI AND ITS ERADICATION IN ROSACEA
`
`Department of Physiology and *Department of Conservative Dentistry, University School of
`Medicine, Cracow, Poland.
`
`Rosacea is a common condition of unknown etiology usually accompanied by
`to
`the
`treatment with
`gastrointestinal symptoms and favorably responding
`antibiotics. This study was designed
`to examine
`the prevalence of gastric
`lle/icobacter pylori (Hp) infection verified by 13C-UTB-test, CLO, Hp culture and
`serology (IgG) in patients with rosacea. Gastroduodenoscopy was combined with
`pentagastrin secretory test and antral and fundic biopsy samples were taken for
`histological evaluation (the Sydney system). Blood samples were also taken for the
`determination of plasma gastrin using RIA and plasma interleukin (IL)-8 and tumor
`necrosis factor alpha (TNFa) using ELISA. This study was performed in 60 patients,
`31-72 year old, with visible papules and pustules associated with erythema and
`flushing on the face and on 60 age- and gender-matched patients without any skin
`diseases but with similar as in rosacea gastrointestinal symptoms but without
`endoscopic changes in gastroduodenal mucosa (non-ulcer dyspepsia - NUD). The
`Hp prevalence in rosacea patients was about 88 % as compared to 65% in control
`NUD patients. Among rosacea patients, 67% were cytotoxin associated gene
`A (CagA) positive, while in NUD patients .only 32% were CagA positive. Rosacea
`patients showed gastritis with activity of about 2.1 in antrum and 0.9 in the corpus of
`the stomach while those with NUD only mild gastritis with activity of -1.0)
`confined to the antrum only. Following initial examination, typical 1 wk anti-Hp
`therapy including omeprazole (20 mg bd.), clarithromycin (500 mg bd.) and
`metronidazol (500 mg bd.) was carried out. After eradication, 51 out of 53 treated
`rosacea patients became Hp negative. Within 2~ weeks, the symptoms of rosacea
`disappeared in 51 patients, markedly declined in 1 and remained unchanged in
`1 other subject. A dramatic reduction in activity of gastritis (to 0.3 in antrum and to
`0.1 in corpus) was observed. Basal plasma gastrin decreased from 48 ± 5 pM before to
`17 ± 3 pM after eradication, while pentagastrin-induced maximal (MAO) declined,
`respectively, from about 16.6 ± 4.2 to 8.5 ± 1.8 mmoljh. Plasma TNFa: and IL-8
`were reduced after the therapy by 72% and 65%, respectively. We conclude that: 1)
`Rosacea is a disorder with various gastrointestinal symptoms closely related to
`gastritis, especially involving the alllrum mucosa, with Hp expressing cagA in the
`majority of cases and elevated plasma levels of TN Fa and IL-8; 2) The eradication of
`Hp leads to a dramatic improvement of symptoms of rosacea and reduction in
`related gastrointestinal symptoms, gastritis, hypergastrinemia and gastric acid
`secretion; and 3) Rosacea could be considered as one of the major extragastric
`symptoms of Hp infection probably mediated by Hp-rclated cytotoxins and
`cytokines.
`
`Key words: Rosacea, llelicobacter pylori, cytotoxins, /L-8, TNFet, gastric mucosa, gastrin
`
`7 -
`
`Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
`
`1
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`778
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Rosacea belongs to the group of chronic skin diseases involving about 2%
`of the population and most often appears in adults usually in their thirties and
`older (1). Although more frequent in women, the symptoms are more intensive
`in men (2). The skin changes are symmetrical and located mainly in the middle
`area of the face. Still, they can also appear on the neck and legs. At first, they
`are characterized as erythematous changes, which with
`time
`lead
`to
`teleangiectasia, papular and pustular eruption, an overgrowth of connective
`tissue and sebaceous glands, especially in men (rhinophyma (3, 4, 5). Except for
`the classic rosacea, there are also atypical forms: circumscribed, diffuse,
`extra-facial, conglobata, fulminant or granulomatous (3, 5).
`The course of rosacea is chronic with periodic improvement or aggravation.
`It was noted that the worsening of skin changes can occur after excessive
`exposure to ultraviolet light and stress, after alcohol intake, strong coffee or hot
`food etc. Additionally, a connection between intensified rosacea and hormonal
`changes during menstruation period or menopause in women has been noticed
`(3-5).
`Except for the skin, eye changes occur with the characteristics of eyelid
`inflammation, conjunctivitis,
`iritis. Besides, gastric disorders such as
`hypochlorhydria, gastritis and peptic ulcer disease (3, 4, 5) have also been noted.
`Despite numerous studies, the pathogenesis of rosacea remains unknown. It
`is assumed that the development of skin changes is caused by many, unrelated
`factors. It is believed that, dependent on emotional factors or resulting from
`excessive vessels' sensitivity to endogenous opiates or its excessive secretion,
`vasomotor disorders play a marked role (6, 7). Moreover, it has been observed
`in patients with rosacea an increased concentration of substance P, which has
`an influence on vasodilation and a local inflammatory reaction (8).
`No relation between the degree of the development in skin changes and
`seborrhea has been noted despite the location of the skin symptoms in so called
`seborrheic areas (9).
`Intensified skin changes during menstruation and their aggravation in
`women during menopause suggest hormonal factors in the pathogenesis of
`rosacea (4).
`The occurrence of Demodex folliculorum in hair follicles and sebaceous
`glands located within the skin changes could indicate their participation in the
`pathomechanism of rosacea. Although can be found more often in the affected
`areas, it can be also found in skin appendages in healthy patients (10-12).
`In patients with rosacea, digestive dosorders such as achlorhydria, gastritis
`or even chronic peptic ulcer disease are very often observed (3-5, 13-16). At
`present it is known that Helicobacter pylori {Hp) plays the key role in the
`development of gastritis, peptic ulcer, MALT lymphoma or even gastric cancer
`
`I '
`
`2
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`779
`
`strongly suggesting an involvement of the bacterium also in the mechanisms
`of certain skin changes diseases. Hp is a spiral bacterium which, is linked
`to B-form of gastritis, and the release of various noxious substances including
`platelet activating factor (PAF), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), cytotoxins such
`as CagA and VacA proteins and numerous cytokines originating from the
`host cells such as interleukin (IL)-8, ILl p, TNFrt, ammonia due to high
`to
`the
`urease activity and others. These substances may contribute
`inflammation of gastric mucosa, alterations in gastric acid secretion ranging
`from achlorhydria in acute phase of infection with pangastritis to gastric
`hyperchlorhydria in chronically infected patients with typical chronic active
`antritis and high plasma gastrin levels. In addition, there is an increase in
`production of IgG and lgA antibodies to Hp in gastric juices and in the
`plasma (17-20).
`This study was designed: 1) to establish the prevalence of Hp infection in
`the stomach of patients with rosacea symptoms as based on standard Hp
`detection tests, 2) to assess the relation between the colonization of the gastric
`mucosa with Hp and the symptoms of rosacea, and 3) to compare the
`co-existence of the Hp infection in the stomach and skin disorders before and
`after the application of one-week triple therapy (omeprazol + clarythromycin
`+ metronidazol).
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`
`The studies were performed on 60 control subjects without any demonstrable endoscopic
`gastroduodenal changes but with various subjective gastrointestinal symptoms of non-ulcer
`dyspepsia (NUD) similar to those recorded in rosacea patients and on 60 patients with rosacea, all
`aged between 30 and 70 years. Skin symptoms were evaluated on a three grade scale;
`I -
`erythematous alone, erythematous and papular; II -
`papular, papulo-pustular and
`teleangiectasias; III -· inflammatory infiltration, nodulous changes, rhinophyma (5).
`The tests were conducted before and after four weeks of anti-Hp therapy. Patients had no
`ailments in other organs and took no antibiotics for at least four weeks prior to the tests. All
`patients underwent gastroscopy during which mucosal biopsy samples were taken from the
`stomach (from amrum and from corpus) to perform a rapid urease CLO-test (Jartox-H.p.-test,
`Procter and Gamble, Pharmaceutical, Wcitcrstradt, Germany) and bacterial culture from biopsy
`samples on special agar plates with the addition of 5% of horse serum and antibiotics blocking the
`growth of bacteria others than Hp. Furthermore, the biopsy samples of antral and fundic mucosa
`were taken for histological evaluation using Sydney classification. To confirm the Hp infection in
`
`the stomach, the 13C-urca breath test e3C-UBT) was performed as described before (21).
`
`Additionally, the level.of lgG anti-Hp and anti-CagA antibodies were measured in plasma by
`ELISA as described before (21). Blood samples were withdrawn under basal conditions for
`determination of plasma gastrin by radioimmunoassay and TNFa: and intcrlcukin-8 (IL-8) using
`· ELISA as described before (21). Finally, gastric secretory test was performed during the endoscopy
`using single dose (2 Jlg/kg) of pentagastrin (Pcptavlon, Zcncca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK) injected
`i.m. 10 min before the start of the start of endoscopy. The gastric juice present in the stomach was
`removed and then aspirated during 10 min of gastric endoscopy as described before (22). The
`
`3
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`r
`
`\
`t
`
`780
`
`volume of collected juice was mutliplied by H+ concentration and again multiplied by 6 to express
`the H + output in mmolfh.
`All patients with a diagnosed Hp infection underwent a one-week triple therapy (23, 24)
`including omeprazol 2x20 mg, clarytromycin 2x500 mg and metronidazol 2x500 mg. Despite
`symptoms no other dermatological treatment was applied 10 days before and during anti-Hp
`therapy.
`Four weeks after the completion of the therapy, all laboratory tests were repeated to establish
`the effectiveness of the applied therapy. The results were statistically analysed by means of the chi
`2 test, with a significance degree of p<0.05.
`
`RESULTS
`
`In the group of 60 patients with rosacea, 53 (88.3%), while in 60 age-and
`gender-matched NUD controls only 69 (65%) had the Hp infection as
`least
`two of Hp
`confirmed by at
`(Fig. 1). The largest number of the infected patients were between 41-50 years
`of age (20 patients -
`37.7%) and the smallest number aged between 31-60
`5.6%) (Fig. 2). The Hp positivity was detected in 88% of
`years (3 patients -
`rosacea patients and in 65% in NUD controls was largely observed in
`
`tests e3C-UBT, CLO, culture
`
`100
`
`c 80
`CJ)
`0
`c
`... 60
`11'1
`--~
`0
`.c
`- 40
`
`11'1
`c:
`Q)
`:;:
`c
`0.
`0 20
`~ 0
`
`0
`
`CLO
`Gastric culture
`UBT
`
`Hp (+)
`(+)
`(+)
`
`Hp (-)
`(-)
`(-)
`
`N =60
`
`100
`
`c 80
`::::>
`z
`.c
`:= 60
`~
`
`11'1 -
`-
`
`c:
`Q)
`:40
`c
`0.
`0
`a-!! 20
`
`0
`
`Hp (+)
`(+)
`(+)
`
`Hp (-)
`(-)
`(-)
`
`Fig. 1. The Hp positivity measured by CLO, culture and UBT in rosacea and NUD controls
`Asterisk indicates significant decrease below the value obtained in rosacea patients.
`
`4
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`patients between 31 and 60 years of age. The overall difference
`Hp
`prevalence between rosacea patients and NUD comrols was statistically
`significant (Fig. 1),
`
`781
`
`N=53
`("rolal number of patlents N=60)
`
`41-:-50
`years old
`
`51+60
`years old
`
`6 +70
`years old
`
`Fig. 2. Th~ age distribution of Hp positive patients with rosacea.
`
`Fig. 3 shows the occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with
`rosacea and the presence of Hp in their stomach. Among 52 rosacea patients
`reporting a variety of gastrointestinal symptoms, e.g., heartburn, flatulence,
`the group
`belching, light pain, diarrhea, etc., 47 were Hp-positive,
`without symptoms (8 patients) the presence of the bacterium was found
`6 patients. Among NUD controls
`patients showed gastrointestinal
`symptoms irrespective whether they were Hp positive or
`negative.
`Ba.sed on the histological examination of biopsy specimens taken from
`gastric mucosa, it was established (based on the classification of inflammatory
`changes according to the Sydney system) that the largest proportion of rosacea
`patients,
`i.e. 72%, exhibited
`the histologically chronic active gastritis,
`predominantly involving the antral portion of the stomach (antritis). In about
`0%
`patients chronic active multifocal inflammation of the stomach
`(gastritis mult{/ocalis), and in remaining 18% antritis and chronic inflammation
`of the body of the stomach (corpusitis) were found (Fig. 4). In NUD controls,
`only antral chronic active gastritis without involvement of the fundic gland
`area was found in histology.
`
`5
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`782
`
`r::~
`',,,, Without gastric
`symptoms
`
`Hp (+)
`
`Hp (-)
`
`Fig. 3. The occtirrencc of g«strointestinal symptoms in Hp positive and
`patients.
`
`negative rosocea
`
`Gastritis
`, - - - - -
`multifocalis
`
`Corpusitis
`
`Fig. 4. Histology findings in the antrum and corpus of the stomach in rosucea patients.
`
`patients with Hp infection in
`Based on serological tests, it turned out that
`the stomach, the plasma anti-Hp antibodies of lgG class were present in about
`88%
`infected patients and antibodies to CagA in about 67'% of these
`patients (Fig. 5). These seroprevalence of anti-Hp and anti-CagA antibodies
`between rosacea patients and NUD controls was statistically significant
`of 53 Hp-positive patients with typical for rosacea skin changes, the
`anti-Hp therapy resulted in Hp eradication in all treated patients as confirmed
`
`6
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`detecting tests. The cutaneous rosacea ~ymptoms
`by at least two of the
`disappeared or fully receded
`51 patients, markedly declined
`one but
`remained unchanged in one other patients (Fig.
`
`783
`
`'100
`
`I
`
`80
`
`(j)
`>
`:;:::
`·;;; 60
`0
`0..
`l!J
`Ol
`0 40
`~~
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Rosacec
`
`NUD
`
`Fig. 5. Serum levels of lgG anti-Hp and anti-CagA antibodies to Hp in patients with rosacea and in
`'KUD controis. Asterisk indicates significant decrease below the value obtained in rosacea patients.
`
`II) -t:
`
`.!!!
`0
`a.
`0
`~
`
`Fig. 6. Dermatological effects of Hp eradication.
`
`triple therapy
`
`7
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`784
`
`Serum levels of TNFa. and IL-8 were reduced after anti-Hp therapy by 72
`and 65%, respectively. Serum gastrin level that under basal conditions
`amounted to about 48 ± 5 pM was reduced after Hp therapy by 35%.
`Maximal gastric acid secretion induced by pentagastrin that averaged about
`16.6 ± 4.2 mmol/h in rosacea patients before the anti-Hp therapy was
`significantly reduced to about 8.5 ± 1.8 mmol/h 4 weeks upon the completion
`of this therapy.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Hp is an undoubtly the most common cause of infection of the world
`dimention and is usually accompanied by gastritis and various gastrointestinal
`symptoms that favorably respond to antibiotic therapy (25). The major interest
`in Hp-related diseases has so far been focused on local gastro-duodenal disorders
`induced by the inoculation of gastro-duodenal mucosa by Hp and resulting in
`gastritis, peptic ulcerations, gastric cancer and MALT lymphoma (25).
`More recently numerous publications described an association, mostly
`based on epidemiological studies, between the gastric Hp infection and certain
`extragastric symptoms of this infection including cardio-vascular system (26),
`extragastric MALT lymphoma (26), food allergy (27), certain skin diseases (28)
`and others described, in part, in this issue of this Journal.
`Our present results provide an evidence that rosacea could be considered as
`one of major extragastric manifestations of Hp infection in the stomach. We
`found that the prevalence of Hp infection in rosacea patients was significantly
`higher than in age- and gender-matched controls as documented by 13C-UBT,
`CLO, culture and serology. Also the expression of Hp-related CagA cytotoxin
`was significantly higher in rosacea patients (about 67%) than in age- and
`gender-matched controls (32%). The seropositivity of CagA and significantly
`elevated serum levels of proinflammatory cytokins such as TNFa. and IL-8,
`were probably the major factors in the pathogenesis of rosacea symptoms.
`These factors could also explain the presence of chronic active gastritis in all
`subjects tested and confined predominantly to the antrum (antritis) and less
`often to the corpus (cmpusitis) in our rosacea patients.
`The major support for the notion that Hp infection is strongly associated
`with rosacea
`is provided by our finding
`that
`the successful anti-Hp
`therapy, including antibiotics (clarythromycin +metronidazole) combined with
`omeprazole, was followed by the disappearance of the rosacea symptoms in
`almost all patients and also caused a marked reduction in gastrointestinal
`symptoms. Also, the serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as TN A a.
`and IL-8, were dramatically reduced (by 72% and 65%, respectively) following
`such anti-Hp therapy.
`
`8
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`--1
`
`785
`
`As critically discussed in present issue of this journal by \Vedi and Kapp
`(27), various skin diseases have been linked to Hp infection with best
`evidence for such association found with urticaria and rosacea. The major
`problems with clear cut documentation of this linkage are various confounding
`factors, especially properly selected control group, which have to be taken
`under consideration in epidemiological studies related to this linkage. So
`far only Bamford et a/. (28), conducted the double-blind placebo control
`randomized study but, while in their study no difference was found in the
`Hp prevalence between rosacea and their double-blind controls, they also
`showed marked improvement of the rosacea symptoms thought it was
`irrespective to the presence of Hp infection. Authors concluded, therefore,
`that Hp is not the major determinant of the presence, severity and extent
`of rosacea.
`Our results confirms, in part, these finding by showing that: 1) the Hp
`prevalence is significantly higher in the rosacea patients than in age- and
`gender, and 2) the anti-Hp therapy is highly efficient in the reduction in the
`rosacea symptoms. Our conclusions differ, however, from those of Bamford et
`a/. (28), as we demonstrated for the nrst time that not Hp alone. but the
`Hp-related virulence factors (CagA) and cytokines (TNFet, IL-8) are probably
`the major pathogenic factor in the Hp-infected rosacea patients and that the
`eradication of Hp in the rosacea patients abolish both the cutaneous and
`gastrointestinal symptoms. Furthermore, the anti-Hp therapy dramatically
`improved the histology of the gastric mucosa and restored highly elevated
`plasma gastrin level and elevated gastric acid secretion. Thus, it is reasonable
`to accept that CagA positive Hp and various Hp-related cytokines contribute
`to the pathogenesis of rosacea and accompanying gastrointestinal symptoms.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Chu T. Treatment of rosacea. Practitioner 1993; 237: 941-945.
`2. Amichai B, Grunwald 1\tH, Avinoach J, Halevy S. Granulomatous rosacea associated with
`Demodex folliculorum. Int J Dermatol 1992; 31 (10): 718-719.
`3. Jablonska S, Chorzclski T. Skin Disease (in Polish). PZWL 1994, pp. 386-387.
`4. Gwicidzinski Z. Rosacea -
`pathogenesis and treatment (in Polish). Medipress Dermal
`1998; 3: 1-3.
`5. Braun-Falco 0, Plcwig G, Wolff HH, Winkelmann RK. Dermatology. Springer Verlag Berlin
`Heidelberg 1991.
`6. Wilkin JK. Rosacea. Pathophysiology and treatment. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130: 359-362.
`7. Zegarska B. Pathological processes in the upper digestive tract in patients with rosacea and
`role of food allergens in etiopathogenesis of this disease. (in Polish). Doctor's Thesis, Medical
`Academy, Bydgoszcz 1993.
`8. Powell EC, Corbally N, Powell D. Substance P and rosacea. JAm Acad Dermatol 1993; 28:
`132-133.
`
`9
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182
`
`

`
`r
`
`786
`
`9. Kozminska-Kubarska A. Outlines of Medical Cosmetic (in Polish). PZ\VL Warszawa 1991:
`149-151.
`10. Bonnar E, Eustace P, Powell FC. The Demodex mite population in rosacea. J Am Acad
`Dermatol. 1993; 28: 443-448.
`11. Niczyporuk W, D<1browski M. Rosacea a Demodex folliculorum. Post Dermatol 1992; 9:
`165-167.
`12. Nowicki R. Demodicosis (Acne rosacea demodes). Przegl Dermatol 1993; 80: 568-570.
`13. Broniarczyk-Dyla G, Dubla-Berner M. Current review of etiopathogenesis and treatment of
`rosacea (in Polish). N01ra Medycyna 1997; 4: 23-24.
`14. Maciejewska-Udziela B, Jakubowicz K. Secretory function and morphology of gastric mucosa
`in rosacea (in Polish) Przegl Dermatol 1985; 72: 3-6.
`15. Rebora A, Drago F, Parodi A. May 1/e/icobacter pylori be important for dermatologist?
`Dermatology 1995; 191 (1): 6-8.
`16. Utas S, Ozbakir 0, Turasan A, Utas C. llelicobacter pylori eradication treatment reduces the
`severity of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40 (3): 433-435.
`17. McColl KEL, EI-Omar EM, Gillen D. The role of H. pylori infection in the pathophysiology of
`duodenal ulcer disease. J Physiol Pharmacol 1997; 48 (3): 287-295.
`18. Konturek PCh, Konturek J\V, Konturek S J. Gastric secretion and the pathogenesis of peptic
`ulcer in the llelicobacter pylori infection. J Physiol Pharmacal 1996; 47 (1): 5-19.
`19. Marshall BJ, Barret LJ, Prakash C et a/. Urea protects Helicobacter (Campylobacter) pylori
`from the bactericidal effect of acid. Gastroenterology 1990; 99: 691-702:
`20. Shimoyama T, Crabtree JE. Mucosal chemokincs in 1/e/icobacter pylori infection. J Physiol
`Pharmacal 1997; 48 (3): 315-323.
`21. Pytko-Polonczyk J, Konturck SJ, Karczcwska E, Biclanski \V, Kaczmarczyk-Stachowska A.
`Oral cavity as permanent reservoir of He/icobacter pylori and potential source of infection.
`J Physiol Pharmacal 1996; 47: 121-127.
`22. lijima K, Ohara S, Sekine H et a/. Changes in gastric secretion assayed by endoscopic test
`before and after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gut 2000; 46: 20-26.
`23. Labcnz J, Malfertheiner P. European Concepts for the Management of Helicobacter pylori
`Infc.ction. Munch Med Wschr 1997; 24: 30-32.
`24. Cave DR, HolTman JS. Treatment of H. pylori infection in patiel)t-S witrh ulcer disease. (in
`polish) . .Med Dyp/ 1996; 5: 171-179.

`25. Konturck PC, Hahn EG, Konturek SJ. llelicobacler pylori associated gastric pathology.
`J Plzysiol Pharmacal 1999, 50: 695-710.
`26. Konturek SJ. Role of llelicobacter pylori infection in cxtragastro-duodcnal disorders:
`Introductory remarks. J Plzysiol Pharmacal 1999; 50: 683-694.
`27. Wedi B, KappA. Helicobacter pylori infection and skin diseases. J Plzysiol Pharmaco/1999, 50:
`753-776.
`28. Bamford JTM, Tilden RL, Blankush JL, Gangcness DE. Effect of treatment Helicobacter pylori
`infection on rosacea. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 659-663.
`
`Received: October 28, 1999
`Accept c d: November 24, 1999
`
`Author's address: A. Szlachcic, Department of Physiology Univ. Med. School, Cracow,
`Poland.
`
`10
`
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc. Ex 2008
`Dr. Reddy's Labs v. Galderma Labs., Inc.
`IPR2015-0182

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket