throbber
Clin. exp. lmmuMI. (1979} 35,443-446.
`
`Inhibition of mitogen-induced human lymphocyte proliferative
`responses by tetracycline analogues
`
`Y, H. THONG & A. FERRANTE Department of Paediatrics, The University of Adelaide, The Adelaide Children's
`Hospital, North Adelaide, 5006 South Australia
`
`(Recrived 20 December 1977}
`
`SUMMARY
`The effect of tetracyclines on mitogen-induced proliferative responses of human lymphocytes was
`examined. The results showed that of the three tetracycline analogues studied, doxycycline
`possessed the most potent inhibiting effects. This occurred at drug concentrations (1-10 /lg/ml)
`easily attainable in serum during conventional dosage schedules. Other investigations have
`shown that tetracyclines also interfere with neutrophil function. Taken together, these findings
`may have clinical significance. Recovery from serious infections generally requires some minimal
`host immune responses, and the immunosuppressive side-effects of tetracyclines may have detri-
`mental effects on patients with debilitating illnesses or impaired immunological defence mecha-
`nisms. Furthermore, tetracyclines may share some common properties of conventional immuno-
`suppressive drugs, such as cytotoxicity, teratogenicity and cancerogenicity. The long-term use of
`tetracyclines for conditions such as chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis and acne vulgaris needs to be
`re-examined.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`The tetracyclines are a group of antibiotics with broad spectrum antimicrobial activity enjoying wide-
`spread clinical use (Weinstein, 1975). Previous studies have shown that tetracyclines exert inhibitory
`effects on neutrophil function (Munoz & Geister, 1950; Forsgren, Schmeling & Q!tie, 1974; Martin
`eta/., 1973; 1974; Rubinstein & Pelet, 1973; Hill eta/., 1974). The effect of tetracyclines on lymphocyte
`function has not been studied. We have therefore studied the effects of tetracycline analogues on mitogen-
`induced lymphocyte proliferative responses, the in vitro correlates of immune responsiveness.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`The tetracycline analogues (tetracycline, doxycycline and oxytetracycline} were kindly provided by Pfizer Prop. Ltd., New
`South Wales, Australia. They were dissolved in RPMI 1640 tissue culture medium on the day of each experiment.
`Lymphocytes were purified from heparinized blood of healthy adult donors by Hypaque-Ficoll centrifugation (Boyum,
`1968}. The cells were washed three times and resuspended in RPMI1640 medium containing 10% heat-inactivated foetal
`calf serum. Preliminary studies have established that the tetracycline analogues, at the concentrations used in these experi-
`ments, were not toxic to lymphocytes for up to 4 days in culture, as assessed by trypan blue dye exclusion,
`Lymphocyte transformation studies were performed by a microtechnique described previously (Thong et al., 1973).
`Briefly, sterile microtitre plates were used for cell cultures. Each round-bottom well received 2 x 105 lymphocytes in 0·1 ml
`volume and either 0·05 ml of phytohaemagglutinin (PHA} or pokeweed mitogen (PWM}. To the test wells Wf!re added 0·05
`ml of one of the tetracycline analogues to reach a final concentration of 1·0 pg, 4·0 pg or 10 pg{ml. Control wells received
`0·05 ml of medium only. The final concentrations for PHA (1·0 pgfml} and PWM (SO pgfml) used in these experiments were
`previously determined to produce optimal stimulation.
`
`Correspondence: Dr Y. H. Thong, Department of Paediatrics, The University of Adelaide, The Adelaide Children's
`Hospital, North Adelaide, 5006 South Australia.
`0099-9104{79/003()...{)#3$02.00 @ 1979 Blackwell Scientific Publications
`443
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1030
`
`Exh. 1030
`
`

`
`444
`Y. H. Tltong CS A. Ferrante
`The microtitre plates were incubated for 72 hr at 37°C in a 5% C02-air atmosphere and high humidity. 6 hr prior to
`harvesting, 1·0 pCi of 3H-thymidine was added to each weil. Harvesting was performed with the aid of a Skatron multiple
`sample harvester. The cells were aspirated onto glass-fibre filters, automatically washed with 0·015 M saline and then dried for
`quantification of radioactive uptake in a Packard Tricarb liquid scintillation spectrometer.
`Additional experiments were performed to examine the effect of delayed addition of doxycycline on lymphocyte prolifera·
`tive responses. A separate set of experiments was performed to determine whether the inhibitory effects of doxycycline on
`lymphocyte transformation could be reversed by washing. A further set of experiments was also conducted to assess blasto-
`genic responses by direct microscopy of stained samples, in order to confirm that inhibition of 3H-thymidine uptake correlates
`with suppression of blastogenesis.
`
`RESULTS
`Among the three tetracycline analogues, doxycycline was found to produce the greatest suppression of
`3H-thymidine uptake in both PHA-stimulated (Table 1), and PWM-stimulated cultures (Table 2).
`
`T ABLE 1. Effect of tetracycline analogues on PHA-induced human 1ymphocyte proliferative responses
`
`Tetracycline
`
`Doxycycline
`
`Oxytetracycline
`
`Drug
`concentration
`(pgfml)
`
`Ctfmin 3H-
`thymidine
`uptake
`
`Percentage
`inhibition
`
`Ct{min 3H-
`thymidine
`uptake
`
`Percentage
`inhibition
`
`Ctfmin 3H·
`thymidine
`uptake
`
`Percentage
`inhibition
`
`1
`4
`10
`
`35,990± 10,425
`31,569± 8644*
`32,030± 8864*
`
`15·4
`25·0
`24·0
`
`34,592± 10,541
`26,849± 8299t
`2282±560t
`
`18·7
`35·8
`94·4
`
`35,696± 6705
`30,749± 8977*
`31,945± 8395*
`
`14·4
`26·4
`23·0
`
`Results represent mean± s.d. of nine experiments using cells from nine different donors. Uptake of 3H-thymidine in
`control cultures was 42,288± 8127 ct{min (mean± s.d.).
`* P< 0·01.
`t P< 0·001.
`
`T ABLE 2. Effect of tetracycline analogues on PWM-induced human lymphocyt~ proliferative responses
`
`Tetracycline
`
`Doxycycline
`
`Oxytetracycline
`
`Drug
`concentration
`(pg/ml)
`
`Ctfmin 3H-
`thymidine
`uptake
`
`Percentage
`inhibition
`
`Ct/min 3H-
`thymidine
`uptake
`
`Percentage
`inhibition
`
`1
`4
`10
`
`17,749± 6478
`13,888± 5063*
`12,042±_5349-
`
`4·8
`27·3
`36·2
`
`17,834±7041
`12,378±4193*
`1423± 1071
`
`5·0
`31·0
`92·2
`
`Ctfmin 3H-
`thymidine
`uptake
`
`Percentage
`inhibition
`
`20,975±9468
`17,217±7602
`16,295± 7537
`
`0
`9·1
`13·6
`
`Results represent mean± s.d. of nine experiments using cells from nine different donors. Uptake of 3H-thymidine in
`control cultures was 19,358±9665 ctfmin (mean±s.d.).
`* P< 0·01.
`t P< 0·001.
`
`At a concentration of 10 Jlg/ml, percentage inhibition of 3H-thymidine uptake in PHA-stimulated
`cultures was 94·4 in doxycycline-treated cultures, compared to 24·0 in tetracycline-treated and 23·0 in
`oxytetracycline-treated cultures. In PWM-stimulated cultures percentage inhibition of 3H-thymidine
`uptake was 92·2 in the presence of doxycycline, compared to 36·2 in the presence oftetracycline, and 13·6
`in the presence of oxytetracycline.
`The inhibitory effect of dQxycycline was also dose-dependent (Tables 1 and 2). This inhibitory effect
`was found tobe due to a direct, inhibition ofblast transformation. At 10 Jlgfml concentration, the blasto-
`
`Exh. 1030
`
`

`
`Tetracyclines and lymphocyte Iransformation
`TABLE 3. Effect of immediate and delayed addition of doxycycline on mitogen-
`induced human lymphocyte proliferative responses
`
`445
`
`Time of addition of
`doxycycline (10 Jlg/ml)
`
`PHA
`ct{min 3H-thymidine
`uptake
`
`PWM
`ct{min 3H-thymidine
`uptake
`
`0
`24 hrs
`48 hr
`None added
`
`3102± 198
`3808±575
`5489±683
`36,946± 6601
`
`1100± 170
`492±38
`1508±419
`16,063± 3252
`
`Results represent mean± s.d. of three experiments using three different donors.
`
`genic index in PHA-stimulated cultures was 0· 5 in the presence of doxycycline compared to 26·1 in the
`control; in PWM-stimulated cultures it was 2·1 in the presence of doxycycline compared to 17·0 in the
`control.
`Some characteristics of this inhibitory effect have been defined. In both PHA- and PWM-treated
`cultures, marked suppression of 3H-thymidine uptake occurred even when doxycycline was added 48 hr
`after the start of experiments (Table 3). The inhibitory effect of doxycycline could be reversed completely
`by washing {Table 4) suggestive of a Iack of tight binding to membrane receptors.
`
`TABLE 4. Reversibility of inhibition of mitogen-induced human lymphocyte
`responses by doxycycline
`
`Treatment
`(doxycycline 10 Jlg/ml)
`
`PHA 3H-thymidine
`uptake
`
`PWM 3H-thymidine
`uptake
`
`Unwashed
`Washed
`Untreated control
`
`2158±631
`22,618± 3519
`26,922± 4236
`
`1377±660
`11,042± 1619
`13,633±2754
`
`Results represent mean± s.d. of triplicate samples.
`In these experiments, lymphocytes were incubated in the presence of
`doxycycline for 1 hr, and then washed three times prior to culture with
`mitogens.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The results of the present sturlies indicate that doxycycline, and to a much lesser extent, tetracycline
`and oxytetracycline, exettapotent inhibitory effect on mitogen-induced lymphoproliferative responses of
`human lymphocytes. Other investigators have also reported that tetracyclines adversely affect neutrophil
`chemotactic (Munoz & Geister, 1950; Forsgren et al., 1974), phagocytic and metabolic function (Rubin-
`stein & Pelet, 1973; Hili et al., 1974), as weil as the bactericidal effect of serum (Forsgren & Gnarpe, 1973).
`Taken together, these observations may have clinical relevance. Since recovery from serious infections
`generally requires at least some minimal host immune responses, these immunosuppressive properties
`of tetracyclines may be detrimental to patients with debilitating diseases or impaired immunological
`defence mechanisms.
`The tetracyclines may also share some common properties of conventional immunosuppressive drugs,
`such as cytotoxicity, teratogenicity and cancerogenicity (Meischer, Gerebtzoff & Lambert, 1976). The
`clinical observation of acute hepatic necrosis in patients treated with tetracyclines may be a manifestation
`of cytotoxic side-effects (Schultz et al., 1963; Lloyd-Still, Grand & Vawter, 1974). Tetracyclines traverse
`the placenta readily and teratogenic effects on rats and humans have been documented (Carter & Wilson,
`
`Exh. 1030
`
`

`
`Y. H. Thong (5 A. Perrante
`446
`1962; Cohlan, Beverlander & Tiamsic, 1963). The cancerogenic potential of tetracyclines has not yet been
`realised clinically. These potential hazards of tracyclines are increased, especially in clinical situations of
`chronic bronchitis and acne vulgaris, where tetracyclines are prescribed for long-term usage.
`The mechanism by which tetracyclines adversely affect immune function is not weil understood. This
`may be related to its metabolic effects on microorganisms. In this respect, its principal action appears to
`be the inhibition of protein synthesis (Gale et al., 1972). At higher concentrations (50-100 p,g/ml), how-
`ever, tetracyclinealso inhibits DNA synthesis and alters the membrane properties of Eschericia coli and
`Bacillus subtilis (Pato, 1977). The relevance of this observation to human lymphocytes is not clear, since
`the effects on human lymphocytes were seen with low concentrations of 1-10 p,g/ml. Further studies are
`needed to elucidate the mechanism of immunosuppression by tetracyclines.
`
`REFERENCES
`J. infect. Dis. 129, 110.
`BöYUM, A. (1968) Isolation of mononuclear cells and granu ..
`locytes from human blood. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest.
`MARTIN, R.R., WARR, G.A., CouCH, R.B. & KNIGHT, V.
`21, Suppl. 97, 77.
`(1973) Chemotaxis of human leukocytes: responsiveness
`of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J. Lab. clin. Med. 81, 520.
`CARTER, M.P. & Wn.soN, F. (1962) Tetracycline and con-
`genitallimb abnormalities. Brit. med. J. ii, 407.
`MEISCHER, P.A., GEREBTZOFF, A. & LAMBERT, P.H. (1976)
`Immunosuppressive therapy. Textbook oflmmutuJpathology
`CoHLAN, S.Q., BEVERLANDER, G. & TIAMSIC, T. (1963)
`Growth inhibition of prematures receiving tetracycline.
`(ed. by P.A. Meiseher and H.J. Müller .. Eberhard), p. 343.
`Amer. J. Dis. Child. 105, 65.
`Stratton, New Y ork.
`FoRSGREN, A., SCHMELING, D. & QyiE, P.G. (1974) Effect of
`MUNoz, J. & GEISTER, R. (1950) Inhibition of phagocytosis
`by aureomycin. Proc. Soc. exp. Bio/. (N. Y.), 75, 367.
`tetracycline on the phagocytic function of human leuko-
`cytes. J. i"fect. Dis. 130, 412.
`PATO, M.L. (1977) Tetracycline inhibits propagation of
`deoxyribonucleic acid replication and alters membrane
`FoRSGREN, A. & GNARPE, H. (1973) Tetracycline inter·
`ference with the bactericidal effect of serum. Nature : New
`properties. Antimicrob. Agentsand Chemother. 11, 318.
`Biology, 244, 82.
`RUBINSTEIN, A. & PELET, B. (1973) False..negative N.B.T.
`tests due to transient malfunction of neutrophils. Lancet, i,
`GALE, E.F.; CUNDLIFFE, E., REYNOLDS, P.E., RICHMOND,
`M.H. & WARING, M.J. (1972) The Molecu/ar Basis of
`382.
`Antibiotic Action. p. 315. J. Wiley and Sons, London.
`SCHULTZ, J.C., .ADAMSON, J.S. ]R., WoRKMAN, W.W. &
`HILL, H.R., KAPLAN, E.L., DAJANI, A., WANNAMAKER, L.W.
`NoRMAN, T.D. (1963) Fatalliver disease after intravenous
`administration of tetracycline in high dosage. New Eng/.
`& QyiE, P.G. (1974) Leukotactic activity and nitroblue
`J. Med. 269, 999.
`tetrazolium dye reduction by neutrophil granulocytes
`from patients with streptococcal skin infection. J. infoct.
`THONG, Y.H., STEELE, R.W., VINCENT, M.M., HENSEN, S.A.
`Dis. 129, 322.
`& BELLANTI, J.A. (1973). Impaired in vitro cell-mediated
`immunity to rubella virus during pregnancy. New Eng/. J.
`LLOYD .. STILL, J.D., GRAND, R.J. & VAWTER, G.F. (1974)
`Med. 289, 604.
`Tetracycline hepatotoxicity in the differential diagnosis of
`post--operative jaundice. J. Pediat. 84, 366.
`WEINSTEIN, L. (1975) The sulfonamides. The Pharmaco ..
`logical Basis of Therapeutics (ed. by L.S. Goodman and
`MARTIN, R.R., WARR., G.A., CouCH, R.B., YEAGER, H. &
`KNIGHT, V. (1974) Effects of tetracycline on leukotaxis.
`A. Gilman), p. 1183. Macmillan, New York.
`
`Exh. 1030

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket