throbber
V.
`Galderma Laboratories, lnc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1011
`Exh. 1011
`
`

`
`therapelJtics for the clinician
`
`Treatment of Rosacea With
`Doxycycline Monohydrate
`
`Joseph B. Bikowski, MD, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
`
`Rosacea is one of the most common/y occurring
`inflammatory dermatoses treated by dermatolo-
`gists today. Estimates suggest that at least 13 mil-
`lion Americans have recognized rosacea, and the
`clinical experience of most practitioners would
`add considerably more to that number. Rosacea is
`an inflammatory condition of the skin, c/assica/ly
`presenting with a history of flushing and/or blush-
`ing along with the c/inical findings of erythema,
`edema,
`telangiectasia , papules, pustules, and
`nodules of the face. Severity and distribution vary
`considerably. A patient may have only a few scat-
`tered papules and pustules of the central third of
`the face or there may be numerous inflammatory,
`painful, tender, /arge nodu/es. in some cases, only
`the face may be affected. in other cases, there
`may be lesions of the scalp, neck, and/or torso.
`Although the exact etiology is unknown, rosacea is
`thought by most experts to be an inflammatory
`process incited by vascular instability with subse-
`quent leakage of fluid and inflammatory mediators
`into the dermis.
`
`Treatment frequently consists of a topical med-
`
`ication in combination with a systemic antibi-
`otic. The choice of an appropriate therapeutic
`regimen that fits the Iifesty le and desires of the pa-
`tient is key to patient compliance, which is necessary
`to obtain and maintain suppression of the disease.
`T wo cases of inflammatory rosacea of rhe face in pa-
`tients who desired rapid clearing wirbout the use of
`topical medication are presented. Oral antibiotics are
`a well-established treatment for rosacea, however,
`these patients improved dramatically wirhin 1 to 2
`months of beginning treatment, exclusively with
`doxycycline monohydrate.
`
`Dr. Bikowski is a Clinical Assistant Professor, University of
`Pittsburgh , Oepartment of Dermatology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
`REPRINT REQUESTS to Sewickley Dermatological Associates
`lnc., 701 Broad Street, Sewickley, PA 15143.
`
`FIGURE 1. A 45-year-old man presented with an ery-
`thematous papulo-pustular eruption on the forehead,
`nose, medial cheeks, and ch in. Forehead lesions were
`most impressive.
`
`Case Reports
`Patient 1-A 45-year-old attorney initially presented
`with a 3- to 4-day history of a pruritic, erythematous,
`linear vesicular eruption of the posrerior righr rhigh.
`A diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis secondary
`to poison ivy was made, and the patient was treared
`wirb prednisone 40 mg/day for 10 days. The parient
`was also noted to have an inflammatory eruption of
`the face and related a 3-year history of intermittent
`"break outs" that had becorne constant over the pre-
`ceding 6 months. In addition, he recalled episodes
`of flushing, which occurred after drinking alcohol or
`hot beverages. An erythemarous papulo-pustular
`eruption was present on the forehead, nose, medial
`cheeks, and chin. The forehead lesions were most
`impressive (Figure 1). There were no lesions of the
`neck, scalp, ehest, or back. Because of the initial con-
`sideration of a primary pyoderma, a bacterial culrure
`was obtained from a pustule of the forehead, and a 5-
`day course of azithromycin was prescribed. The cul-
`
`VOLUIVIE 66, AUGUST 2000 149
`
`Exh. 1011
`
`

`
`TREATMENT OF ROSACEA
`
`I
`
`FIGURE 2. Nine weeks of therapy with doxycycline
`monohydrate 100 mg daily produced near-complete
`clearance.
`
`ture was positive for a heavy growth of normal skin
`flora and a rare growth of StajJhylococcus aureus. These
`were not thought to be causative.
`Eight days later, the dermatitis on the thigh had
`resolved and there was a marked decrease in the ery-
`thema of the inflammatory lesions on the face. A di-
`agnosis of severe inflammatory stage Ill rosacea was
`made. Treatment with doxycycline monohydrate 100
`mg/day was initiated. The patient refused topical
`medications in combination with the systemic an-
`tibiotic because of his full-face beard. He did not feel
`that he wou ld be compliant with daily application of
`medication to his entire face. Nine weeks later, the
`eruption had essentially cleared (Figure 2). The
`cheeks, chin, and nose were also free of erythema,
`papules, and pustules. The patient had tolerated
`doxycycline monohydrate well and denied headache,
`gastrointestinal upset, or photosensitivity. The same
`dose of doxycycline monohydrate (1 00 mg/day) was
`continued as maintenance therapy and the patient
`remained clear of all inflammatory lesions at follow-
`up 6 months after initiation of therapy.
`Patient 2-A 49-year-old female patient presented
`after 18 months without therapy and complained that
`her rosacea was flaring. She had previously been
`treated with a systemic antibiotic and topical metron-
`idazole, but decided to stop treatment when her face
`cleared.
`In the 2 months before this visit, she had
`noted increased total face flushing and renewed
`"break-outs" on the nose and cheek. On examina-
`there was a
`tender, painful, erythematous
`tion,
`
`150 CUTIS"
`
`FIGURE 3. A 49-year-old fema/e with a history of
`rosacea presented with tender, painful, erythematous
`swelling of the left side of the nasal tip and sympto-
`matic inf/ammatory nodules of the left malar area. She
`was diagnosed with moderately severe stage /II plaque
`rosacea.
`
`swelling of the left side of the nasal tip and two sim-
`ilarly symptomatic inflammatory nodules of the left
`malar area measuring 1.1 and 0.6 cm in diameter.
`There were no lesions on the remainder of the face
`scalp, neck, or torso. The patient was diagnosed with
`moderately severe stage IIl plaque rosacea (Figure 3 ).
`Because of the severity of her condition, she elected
`to pursue systemic antibiotic therapy, but declined the
`conccimitant use of a topical agent because she did
`not feel that she would comply with daily applica-
`tions. Therapy with doxycycline monohydrate 50
`mg/day was initiated.
`The patient was seen in follow-up 1 month later.
`At that time, there was a marked decrease in the
`edema and erythema of the nasal and cheek lesions
`(Figure 4) . She had experienced no ill side effects
`from the doxycycline monohydrate. She was in-
`structed to continue the same dose-50 mg/day-and
`return in 1 month. At follow-up she was essentially
`clear. There was minimal postinflammatory erythema
`of the nasal tip and left cheek (Figure 5). She had no
`complaints of headache, gastrointestinal upset, or in-
`creased sun sensitivity. The doxycycline monohydrate
`was decreased to 50 mg every other day for long-term
`maintenance therapy.
`
`Comments
`The efficacy of systemic antibiotics alone or in com-
`bination with a topical agent for the treatment of
`rosacea is weil documented.1 Initial therapy usually
`includes an oral antibiotic ( tetracycline, erythromy-
`
`Exh. 1011
`
`

`
`TR EATMENT OF ROSACEA
`
`FIGURE 4. After 1 month of therapy with doxycycline
`monohydrate, the patient demonstrated a marked
`decrease in the edema and erythema of the nasal and
`cheek Jesions.
`
`FIGURE 5. Two months alter the initiation of therapy,
`the patient was essentially clear with minimal postin-
`flammatory erythema of the nasal tip and left cheek.
`
`ein, doxycycline, minocycline) in combination with
`a ropical preparation (metronidazole, clindamycin,
`sodium sulfacetamide, and/or sulfur). The clinician's
`goal is to achieve rapid remission with the oral agent
`and to maintain remission with the topical medica-
`tion if at all possible. Any of the commonly used sys-
`temic antibiotics will usually clear the inflammatory
`lesions of moderately severe stage li or IIl rosacea in
`2 to 6 weeks. The topical agents will demonstrate
`clinical improvement in 4 to 12 weeks, although
`complete clearing may not be obtainable in that pe-
`riod of time with topical medications alone. Though
`the ultimate goal is to taper down and/or discontinue
`oral therapy, intermittent low-dose systemic antibi-
`otics in addition to daily topical treatment may be
`necessary to maintain campiere remission in the ma-
`jority of patients.
`After early claims in the French and Belgian Iit-
`erature taured the success of chloramphenicol in the
`treatment of rosacea, Sneddon' became one of the
`first to detail the success of tetracycline for rhis in-
`dication. In studies conducted from 1964 to 1965,
`he noted an 80% success rate treating rosacea pa-
`tients with 250 mg
`tetracycline
`twice daily. '
`Maibach's2 review of the second-generation tetracy-
`clines was extremely thorough and is worthy read-
`ing. The highlights of that srudy and another recent
`study; will be detailed later.
`include
`tetracyclines
`The second-generation
`minocycline, doxycycline hyclate
`(hydrochloric
`acid), and doxycycline monohydrate. When com-
`
`/:)
`
`increased
`three have
`tetracycline, all
`pared
`to
`bioavailability,
`improved absorption when
`taken
`with food, and broader antibacterial activity.
`Minocycline is not photosensitizing, nor is it
`commonly associated with pseudotumor cerebri.
`However, many other adverse effects have been asso-
`ciated to some degree with minocycline rherapy. Two
`long-known side effects are vertioo-which is more
`common in women than in men-and blue staining
`of the legs, feet, face, or gums. Bluish staining may
`also present
`in acne scars.
`Frequently renned
`"minocycline hyperpigmentation,"
`this blue-gray
`staining may appear wirhin 3 ro 6 months of rhe starr
`of therapy. Staining of rhe teeth may also occur, usu-
`ally after more than 5 years of continuous minocy-
`cline use. O ther side effects have more recently been
`identified with minocycline rherapy. Some young
`women experience a lupus-like syndrome characrer-
`ized by pain, swelling, and stiffness of the joints as
`weil as by fever, pleuritic ehest pain, malaise, and fa-
`tigue. A hypersensitivity syndrome has also been iden-
`fever,
`lymphadenopathy,
`tified, characterized by
`eosinophilia, lymphocytosis, or rash, occuring about
`24 days after the start of therapy. Fi.nally, a serutTt sick-
`ness-like reaction has also been identified with onset
`about 2 weeks after the start of minocycline therapy.
`Symptoms include fever, lymphadenoparhy, arthral-
`gias/arthritis, or rash. With a pH of 2, doxycycline
`hyclate has been associated with a high rate of
`esophageal irritation and gastrointestinal upset. How-
`ever, with a neutral pH of 7, doxycycli ne monohy-
`
`VOLUtJIE 6 . AUGUST 2000 151
`
`Exh. 1011
`
`

`
`TREATMENT OF ROSACEA
`
`drate is not associated with esophageal irritation and
`has a lower incidence of gastrointestinal upset. Doxy-
`cycline is not associated with centrat nervous system
`side effects such as vertigo, but, like all the tetracy-
`clines, it may rarely be associated with pseudotumor
`cerebri. The drug can be photosensitizing-typically
`in fewer than 1% of patients. Photosensitivity is most
`common in patients with excessive summer sun ex-
`posure and presents as redness and blistering of the
`nose, dorsum of the h ands, and fingers. Sunscreen use
`may not prevenr phorosensitivity reactions.
`The second-generation
`tetracyclines have con-
`tributed greatly to the dermatologic armamentarium.
`Though minocycline has been associated with poten-
`tially serious side effects, their incidence is rare and
`sh ould not prevent physicians from prescribing it. Doxy-
`cycline monohydrate represenrs an effective therapeu-
`tic option with advanrages over doxycycline hyclate.
`Doxycycline monohydrate was selected for the pa-
`tienrs presented because it is associated with de-
`creased risk of gastrointestinal upset and esophageal
`ulceration as compared to doxycycline hyclate. O nce-
`daily dosing promotes patient compliance. Doxycy-
`cline monohydrate also carries decreased risk of the
`centrat nervous system side effects associated with
`minocycline therapy.
`
`doxycycline
`
`Information-Monodox®,
`Product
`monohydrate, Oclassen Dermatologics.
`REFERENCES
`I. Sneddon IB: A clinical trial of tetracycline in rosacea. Br J
`Dermatal 78: 649-652, 1966.
`2. Maibach H: Second-generation tetracyclines, a dermato-
`logic overview: clinical uses and pharmacology. Cutis 48:
`411-417, 1991.
`3. Green R, Brown JR, Calvert RT: The disposition of four
`tetracyclines in normal subjects. Eur 1 Clin Pharmacol 10:
`245-250, 1976.
`4. Carlborg B, Farmer J: Esophageal corrosion tests with doxy-
`cycline monohydrate tablets. Curr Ther Res 34: 110-116,
`1983.
`5. White GM: Acne therapy. Disease A Month 45: 301 -332,
`1999.
`6. Rebora A, Drago F, Parodi A: May Helicobacrer pylori be im-
`portant for dermatologists? Dermawlogy 191: 6-8, 1995.
`7. Bonnar E, Eustace P, Powell FC: The Demodex mite pop-
`ulation in rosacea. 1 Am Acad De7mawl 28: 443-448, 1993.
`8. Lloyd KM: Surgical correction of rhinophyma. Arch Derma-
`wl126: 721-723, 1990.
`9. Plewig G , Nikolowski J, Wolff HH: Action of isotretinoin
`in acne, rosacea, and gram-negative folliculitis. ] Am Acad
`Dermawl 6: 766-785 , 1982.
`
`152 CUTIS"
`
`Exh. 1011

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket