throbber
Official Journal of the
`StJohn's Dermatological Society
`
`Univ. of Minn.
`Bio-Medical
`Library
`
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1066
`Exh. 1066
`
`

`
`Clinical and E:cperimental Dermatology 1998; 23: 254-257.
`
`Combination therapy with nicotinamide and tetracyclines
`for cicatricial pemphigoid: further support for its efficacy
`
`·t..:
`
`L.REICHE, F.WOJNAROWSKA * AND E.MALLON* Dermatology Department, Amersham General
`Hospital, Amersham, Bucks HP7 O]D, and *Department of Dermatology, Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Old Road,
`Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK
`
`Accepted for publication 17 July 1998
`
`Summary
`We have previously reported the reduction of cicatricial
`pemphigoid orodynia with minocycline. Tetracycline
`combined with high dose nicotinamide has also been
`beneficial in a number of cutaneous immunological dis-
`orders. We now report a series of eight cases in whom
`further subjective or clinical improvement accrued in
`five, after the addition of high dose (2· 5 or 3 g) nico-
`tinamide to minocycline; however, one of these then
`discontinued the nicotinamide because of headache and
`nausea, another was withdrawn from the study because of
`progressive upper respiratory tract mucosal involvement,
`and two were changed from minocycline to tetracycline
`because they developed minocycline-induced hyper-
`pigmentation.
`
`Cicatricial pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering
`disease1 predominantly affecting the mucosae of elderly
`people. The oral, ocular or genital mucous membranes,
`and also the skin, are frequently involved. The condition
`may cause marked discomfort and can result in scarring
`and disabling stricture formation. Many patients have
`disease that is difficult to treat or have associated side-
`. effects from drugs; conventional treatment involves
`steroids, immunosuppressive therapy and dapsone, each
`of which requires close monitoring. z-s We have also
`previously reported a therapeutic benefit in cicatricial
`pemphigoid from minocycline therapy alone,6 whereas
`Berk and Lorinez reported success from combined
`tetracycline and niacinamide in bullous pemphigoid, 7
`and further studies have supported this. 8•9 Furthermore,
`Chaffins et al. reported success with nicotinamide and
`tetracycline together in 13 cases of pemphigus and linear
`IgA disease. 10 We now report our findings with the
`addition of nicotinamide to minocycline or tetracycline
`in eight patients with cicatricial pemphigoid in an open
`nonplacebo controlled study.
`
`Correspondence: Dr F.Wojnarowska.
`254
`
`Methods
`Cicatricial pemphigoid (CP) patients attending the out-
`patients departments of dermatology at Amersham Gen-
`eral Hospital, Buckinghamshire and the Oxford Radcliffe
`Hospital, Oxford, and who had been taking tetracycline
`for a period of at least 12 weeks without adequate
`symptomatic control, were invited to participate. One
`patient (Case 7) had been changed from minocycline to
`oxytetracycline several months prior to entry into the
`study because of minocycline-induced pigmentation of
`the lower legs, while the remainder (of whom Cases 5 and
`12
`6 have been discussed previously in case reports 11
`) had
`•
`been on minocycline 100 mg daily. Patients with signifi-
`cant liver function test abnormalities on preliminary
`testing were excluded and liver function tests were
`performed every 3 months. The study was approved by
`the research ethics committee in each hospital.
`Patients were commenced on 500 mg of nicotinamide
`daily, the dose then being increased by 500 mg incre-
`ments at 2-week intervals until symptomatic control was
`achieved or a maximum of 3 g daily had been reached,
`usually by 10-12 weeks. Each patient was reviewed at 4-
`6 week intervals. Two visual analogue scales of 0-9 were
`recorded at each visit to evaluate symptoms (where 0
`represented no symptoms and 9 the worst symptoms
`they had ever experienced), firstly at the time of the visit
`and secondly as an average over the preceding month; the
`average was then calculated from these two scores. The
`number and size of the lesions was also recorded as small
`( <0· 5 em), medium (0· 5-2·0 em) or large (>2·0 em), and a
`photographic record kept of each visible lesion. Once
`symptomatic control, or the maximum dose of 3 g, was
`reached the patient was maintained on nicotinamide for 6
`months before the dose was weaned off. Scores prior to
`treatment, after the maximum dose of nicotinamide had
`been taken for 6 months, and 4 months after discon-
`tinuation of the nicotinamide were then compared.
`
`Results
`Eight patients were entered into the trial, seven of whom
`
`© 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd
`
`Exh. 1066
`
`

`
`NICOTINAMIDE AND MINOCYCLINE FOR CICATRICAL PEl\llPHIGOID
`Table 1. Response of CP patients response to 6 months of nicotinamide (2.5-3 g) added to minocycline 100 mg or tetracycline 1 g
`
`255
`
`Visual analogue score
`
`Lesions pre-nicotinamide
`
`-\:;
`
`Size
`
`Small
`Small
`Small
`Small
`Medium
`Small
`Small
`Small
`Small
`Medium
`Small
`Small
`Large
`Small
`Small
`Medium
`Medium
`Medium
`
`Small
`Small
`Small
`Small
`Small
`
`Number
`
`Clinical progress
`
`10
`3
`3
`3 Blisters
`2
`1
`1
`4
`2
`1
`2
`2
`1
`1
`2
`7
`3
`Extensive cutaneous
`disease
`1
`3
`2
`4
`1
`Discomfort
`
`Improved
`Improved
`Improved
`Nil
`Stopped
`Nausea
`
`Varied
`Improved
`Resolved
`Resolved
`Improved
`Unchanged
`Evolved
`Resolved
`Improved
`Improved
`Improved
`
`Improved
`Improved
`Improved
`Unchanged
`Improved
`
`epiglottic
`ulcers/ stridor
`
`Age
`(years)
`
`Case
`
`Sex Before*
`
`Duringt After!
`
`Site
`
`1
`2§
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5§
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`68
`62
`
`73
`
`68
`
`71
`
`72
`
`71
`
`62
`
`M
`F
`
`M
`
`M
`
`F
`
`F
`
`F
`
`F
`
`6
`7
`
`5
`
`4
`
`6
`
`6
`
`5
`
`6
`
`6
`5
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`7
`
`5
`5
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`6
`
`Gingiva
`Palate
`Gingiva
`Conjunctiva
`Palate
`Forehead
`Chin
`Buccal mucosa
`Gingiva
`Groin
`Buccal mucosa
`Palate
`Vulva
`Leg
`Buccal mucosa
`Vulva
`Perianal
`Cutaneous
`
`Conjunctiva
`Buccal mucosa
`Vulva
`Perianal
`Buccal
`mucosa/
`pharynx
`
`*Pre-nicotinamide.
`t After 6 months' nicotinamide treatment.
`!Four months after stopping nicotinamide.
`§Changed from minocycline 100 mg to tetracycline 500 mg twice daily, mid-treatment, because of minocycline pigmentation.
`
`perianal ulceration that was resistant to therapy, while the
`oral and conjunctival disease responded to combination
`therapy. The perianal disease was however complicated
`by haemorrhoids which required surgical excision during
`the study period. Nicotinamide was discontinued in Case
`8 after 12 weeks because of the development of progres-
`sive upper respiratory tract mucosal involvement causing
`stridor: ulceration of the epiglottis was visible at
`bronchoscopy and high dose oral steroid therapy and
`tracheostomy was required to control the symptoms.
`Two of the patients (Cases 2 and 5) also developed
`unacceptable minocycline-induced hyperpigmentation
`during· the study and were therefore changed to tetra-
`cycline 1 g daily instead.
`
`tolerated nicotinamide well; however, Case 3 discontin-
`ued the drug after 2 weeks of 1 g per day because of
`dizziness and nausea; these symptoms then improved
`within 5 days. Symptoms related to his CP did not
`change during the medication period.
`Cases 1 and 5 increased their doses of nicotinamide up
`to 3 g, whereas the remainder reached a maximum dose
`of 2·5 g. None of these patients experienced any adverse
`effects and there were no liver function abnormalities
`detected in any patient during the study.
`All patients (except Cases 3 and 8) derived marked
`clinical improvement during and for 4 months after the
`course of nicotinamide (Table 1 ); of these, subjective
`(visual analogue score) improvement was noted in five
`patients (cases 1, 2, 5, 6, 7). Case 4 remained unchanged,
`Case 5 was the only patient to develop a new lesion (small
`Discussion
`leg erosion) during the study period and Case 6 had
`extensive cutaneous disease, including bilateral palmar
`Nicotinic acid is a vitamin (B3); it is converted to nico-
`involvement, and this, together with oral and genital
`tinamide in the body and then functions as an essential
`ulceration, was improved by nicotinamide and mino-
`coenzyme, accepting hydrogen ions in tissue respiration
`oxidation-reduction reactions. 13 Nicotinamide also inhibits
`cycline combination therapy after 2 months. Case 7 had
`© 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 23, 254-257
`
`Exh. 1066
`
`

`
`256
`
`L.REICHE, F.WOJNAROWSKA AND E.MALLON
`
`clinical assessment is thus very difficult. For these
`reasons we measured the clinical response subjectively
`with visual analogue scales, and clinically by recording
`the number of lesions, measuring their size and keeping
`photographic records. We further chose a 6-month
`period of 1tssessment as a reasonable time frame to
`incorporate the effects of such a fluctuating disease.
`However, this was a pilot, nonplacebo controlled study,
`and should now be followed by a double blind cross-over
`investigation. The striking advantage that nicotinamide
`and tetracycline combination therapy has over treatment
`with corticosteroids and other
`immunosuppressive
`agents is their better side-effect profile in a disease
`which frequently requires prolonged therapy over many
`years. In the light of the dramatic clinical benefits shown
`in this study, therefore we felt these preliminary results
`should be reported.
`
`serum phosphodiesterase, resulting in increased cyclic
`adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) concentrations and,
`in turn, reduced protease release from leucocytes. 13 In
`addition, it inhibits antigen-induced lymphocyte prolif-
`eration and transformation, 14 neutrophil and ·eosinophil
`chemotaxis and secretion, 10 mast cell histamine release
`and is a free radical scavenger. Such properties may
`account for its apparent beneficial effects in a wide
`variety of immunological and inflammatory skin diseases;
`thus a number of these have benefited from high dose
`(300-2500 mg/ day) therapy, particularly dermatitis herpe-
`h
`1
`d'
`.
`1' d
`. c
`. 15
`t11ormts,
`eryt ema e evatum mtmum,
`genera tze
`16
`~ranuloma annulare, 17 various immunobullous diseases, 6
`-
`2 pollmorphic light eruptiol), 18 and necrobiosis lipoi-
`dica.1 Cicatricial pemphigoid is also an immunological
`mucosal and cutaneous disorder, the in vivo deposition of
`immunoglobulins and complement at the basement
`membrane zone with the presence of circulating base-
`ment membrane zone antibodies providing the evidence
`for an autoimmune aetiology.
`Nicotinic acid,
`the precursor of nicotinamide,
`however, has been associated with liver function abnorm-
`alities when used in large doses (3-10 ~/day) in the
`treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. 20- 5 Reversible
`hepatic toxicity has been reported once, following the
`use of 9 g/ day of nicotinamide. Nevertheless we detected
`no liver function abnormalities in our eight cases.
`Furthermore, unlike nicotinic acid, nicotinamide is not
`a potent vasodilator and does not cause flushing14 or
`impair glucose tolerance. It is possible that higher doses
`of the drug could produce further clinical improvement
`than we have reported in our cases, but a closer monitor-
`ing ofliver function tests would then be advised. It would
`also seem prudent to monitor the liver in all patients
`receiving long-term, high dosage therapy. We have also
`previously reported a high prevalence of minocycline-
`induced hyperpigmentation in CP patients, who are also
`often elderly, 6 and a further two cases (2 and 5) developed
`this problem during this study.
`Tetracyclines suppress leucocyte chemotaxis in vitro
`and in vivo at therapeutic concentrations and this is their
`proposed mechanism of action in inflammatory skin
`disease. 7 We have also previously discussed the immuno-
`logical effects of this drug3 and postulated that the
`combined effect of both minocycline and nicotinamide
`in blast transformation inhibition and the inhibition of
`neutrophil and eosinophil chemotaxis could serve to
`downgrade both the afferent and efferent limbs of humoral
`immune responses. 11 Such mechanisms could therefore
`explain the clear additional benefit that we have shown by
`the addition of high dose nicotinamide to minocycline (or
`tetracycline) in CP.
`CP is a rare disease which runs a variable course and
`the acute features of discomfort and ulceration are prone
`to spontaneous relapses and remissions. Objective
`© 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and Experime11tal Dermatology, 23, 254-257
`
`References
`1. Nayar M, Wojnarowska F, Venning Vet a/. Association of auto-
`immunity and cicatricial pemphigoid: Is there an immunogenetic
`basis? JAm Acad Dermato/1991; 25: 1011-5.
`2. Nayar M, Wojnarowska F. Cicatricial pemphigoid: a re-evaluation
`of therapy. J Dermatol Treat 1993; 4: 89-93.
`3. Poskitt L, Wojnarowska F. Drug treatment of autoimmune
`blistering diseases. In: Marks R, Cunliffe WJ, eels. Skin Therapy.
`London: Martin Dunitz Publications, 1994: 184-90.
`4. Wolverton SE. Monitoring for adverse effects from systemic
`drugs used in dermatology. JAm Acad Dermato/1992; 26: 661-
`79.
`5. McDonald GJ. Use of cytotoxic drugs in dermatologic diseases II.
`JAm Acad Dermato/1985; 6: 965-75.
`6. Poskitt L, Wojnarowska F. Minimising cicatricial pemphigoid
`orodynia with minocycline. Br J Dermato/1995; 132: 784-9.
`7. Berk M, Lorinez AL. The treatment of bullous pemphigoid with
`tetracycline and niacinamide. Arch Dermatol 1986; 122: 670-4.
`8. Fivenson D, Breneman D, Rosen G eta!. Nicotinamide and
`tetracycline therapy of bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol
`1994; 130: 753-8.
`9. Kolbach DN, Remme JJ, Bos WH eta/. Bullous pemphigoid
`successfully controlled by tetracycline and nicotinamide. Br J
`Dermatol 199 5; 133: 88-90.
`10. Chaffins ML, Collison D, Fivenson DP. Treatment of pemphigus
`and linear lgA dermatosis with nicotinamide and tetracycline: a
`review of 13 cases. JAm Acad Dermato/1993; 28: 998-1000.
`11. Mallon E, Wojnarowska F. Cicatricial pemphigoid presenting
`with unusual palmar involvement, successfully treated with a
`combination of nicotinamide and tetracycline. Clin E::t"jJ Dermatol
`1994; 19: 526-30.
`12. Poskitt L, Wojnarowska F. Treatment of cicatricial pemphigoid
`with tetracycline andl).icotinamide. Clin Et"jJ Dermato/1995; 20:
`258-9.
`13. Wolverton SE, Wilkin JK. New uses for old drugs. In: Wolverton
`SE, WilkinJK eels. Systemic Drugs for Skin Diseases. Philadelphia:
`W.B. Saunders 1991: 373-4.
`14. Burger DR, Vandenbark AA, Daves D eta!. Nicotinamide:
`suppression of lymphocyte transformation with a component
`identified in human transfer factor. J Immuno/1976; 117: 797-
`801.
`15. Johnson HH, Binkley GW. Nicotinic acid therapy of dermatitis
`herpetiformis. J Invest Dermato/1950; 14: 233-8.
`
`Exh. 1066
`
`

`
`257
`NICOTINAMIDE AND MINOCYCLINE FOR CICATRICAL PEMPHIGOID
`21. Berge KG, Achor RWP, Christensen NA eta!. Hypercholester-
`16. Kohler IK, Lorinez AL. Erythema elevatum diutinum treated
`with niacinamide and tetracycline. Arch Dermato/1980; 116: 693-5.
`emia and nicotinic acid: a long-term study. Am J Med 1961; 31:
`24-36.
`17. Ma M, Medenica M. Response of generalised granuloma
`annulare to high dose niacinamide. Arch Dermatol 1983; 119:
`22. Gurian H, Aldersberg D. The effect of large doses of nicotinic
`acid on circulating lipids and carbohydrate tolerance. Am J Med
`836-9.
`Sci 1959; 237: 12-22.
`18. Neumann R, Rappold E, Pohl-Markl H. Treatment of poly-
`morphous light eruption with nicotinamide: a pilot study. Br J
`23. Kohn RM, Montes M. Hepatic fibrosis following long acting
`nicotinic acid therapy: a case report. Am J Med Sci 1969; 258: 94-
`Dermato/1986; 115:77-80.
`9.
`19. Handfield-Jones S, Jones S, Peachey R. High dose nicotinamide
`in the treatment of necrobiosis lipoidica. BrJ Dermato/1988; 118:
`24. Pardue WO. Severe liver dysfunction during nicotinic acid
`therapy. JAmMed Assoc 1959; 170: 2088-9.
`693-6.
`25. Winter SL, Boyer JL. Hepatitic toxicity from large doses of
`20. Belle M, Halpern MM. Oral nicotinic acid for hyperlipemia-
`vitamin B3 (nicotinamide). N Eng! J .Nied 1973; 289: 1180-2.
`with emphasis on side effects. Am J Cardio/1958; 2: 449-52.
`
`© 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd, Clinical and E:t-perimental Dermatology, 23, 254-257
`
`Exh. 1066

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket