throbber
DERMATOLOGY
`
`JUNE 1994
`
`Univ~;-ot Minn:
`Bio-Medical
`· Library
`06 _15 94
`
`Perifollicular lymphocytic reaction. See page 770.
`
`DERMATOLOGY IN THE OREGON PLAN
`WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE
`PLANS IN OTHER STATES
`P. S. Russell
`
`NICOTINAMIDE AND TETRACYCLINE
`THERAPY OF BULLOpS PEMPHIGOID
`D. P. Fivenson, D. L. Breneman, G. B. Rosen,
`C. S. Hersh, S. Cardone, D. Mutasim
`
`TOPICAL RETINOIC ACID (TRETINOIN)
`FOR MELASMA IN BLACK PATIENTS: A
`VEHICLE-CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
`C. K. Kimbrough-Green, C. E. M. Griffiths,
`L. J. Finkel, T. A. Hamilton, S. M. Bulengo-Ransby,
`C. N. Ellis, J. ]. Voorhees
`
`SPECIFIC PRURITIC DISEASES OF
`PREGNANCY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
`OF 3192 PREGNANT WOMEN
`D. Roger, L. Vaillant, A. Fignon, F. Pierre, Y. Bacq,
`].-F. Brechot, M.-C. Grangeponte, G.Lorette
`
`American Medical Association
`Physicians dedicated to the health of America
`
`FOLLICULAR DEGENERATION
`SYNDROME IN MEN
`LTC L. C. Sperling, CAPT H. G. Skelton III,
`COL K. ]. Smith, COL P. Sau, K. Friedman
`
`INHIBITION OF A MODEL OF IN VITRO
`GRANULOMA FORMATION BY
`TETRACYCLINES AND CIPROFLOXACIN:
`INVOLVEMENT OF PROTEIN KINASE C
`,...,,... ..... - .
`:P
`--·-
`~BXNBdLL****~~ ~-QIG . ~~ 4 -
`9~1 2
`#0l046085805l D l30DQ~
`UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
`-·
`· - : ~u· rcAL LIBRARY
`...
`BIO ~~~ , .. ·
`,.-- ~ -~ zs· A Ul EHL
`1·
`505 E~~cX S
`~t ~ -
`-
`~
`MINNEAPOLIS MN
`5~455-U3~0
`.-------------~-----.
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__ __
`Exhibit 1063
`
`

`
`DERMATOLO
`
`JUNE 1994
`
`Univ .,:-of-Minn:
`Bio .. Medical
`, -~ibrary
`06 _1
`
`Perifollicular lymphocytic reaction. See page 770.
`
`DERMATOLOGY IN THE OREGON PLAN
`WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE
`PLANS IN OTHER STATES
`P. S. Russell
`
`NICOTINAMIDE AND TETRACYCLINE
`THERAPY OF BULLOUS PEMPHIGOID
`D.P. Fivenson, D. L. Breneman, G. B. Rosen,
`C. S. Hersh, S. Cardone, D. Mutasim
`
`TOPICAL RETINOIC ACID (TRETINOIN)
`FOR MELASMA IN BLACK PATIENTS: A
`VEHICLE~CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
`C. K. Kimbrough,Green, C. E. M. Griffiths,
`L. J. Finkel, T. A. Hamilton, S.M. Bulengo,Ransby,
`C. N. Ellis, J. J. Voorhees
`
`SPECIFIC PRURITIC DISEASES OF
`PREGNANCY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
`OF 3192 PREGNANT WOMEN
`D. Roger, L. Vaillant, A. Fignon, F. Pierre, Y. Bacq,
`J.'F. Brechot, M.'C. Grangeponte, G. Lorette
`
`FOLLICULAR DEGENERATION
`SYNDROME IN MEN
`LTC L. C. Sperling, CAPT H. G. Skelton III,
`COL K. J. Smith, COL P. Sau, K. Friedman
`
`INHIBITION OF A MODEL OF IN VITRO
`GRANULOMA FORMATION BY
`TETRACYCLINES AND CIPROFLOXACIN:
`INVOLVEMENT OF PROTEIN KINASE C
`
`American Medical Association
`Physicians dedicated to the health of America
`
`Exh. 1063
`
`

`
`Nicotinamide and Tetracycline Therapy
`of Bullous Pemphigoid
`
`David P. Fivenson, MD; Debra L. Breneman, MD; Gary B. Rosen, MD; Craig S. Hersh, MD;
`Scott Cardone, MD; Diya Mutasim, MD
`
`Background and Design: Th~ combination of nicotin-
`amide and tetracycline has been anecdotally reported to
`be effective in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. We
`conducted a randomized, open-labeled trial comparing the
`combination of 500 mg of nicotinamide, three times daily,
`and 500 mg of tetracycline four times daily, with predni-
`sone therapy in 20 patients with bullous pemphigoid. The
`study was divided between an 8-week acute phase with
`fixed drug dosages and a 10-monthfollow-up phase in which
`study medications were tapered based on patient response.
`
`Results: Eighteen of 20 patients enrolled in the study
`were treated, two patients were unavailable for follow-
`up. Twelve patients were treated with the combination
`of nicotinamide and tetracycline and six patients were
`treated with prednisone. There were five complete re-
`sponses, five partial responses, one nonresponder, and
`one patient with disease progression in the nicotin-
`amide and tetracycline group compared with one com-
`plete response and five partial responses in the predni-
`
`sone group. There were no statistically significant.
`differences in response parameters between the two
`groups. All five patients in the nicotinamide and tetra-
`cycline group receiving long-term follow-up remained
`disease free during medication tapering, while three pa-
`tients in the prednisone group had repeated disease flare-
`ups with steroid tapering. Adverse effects in the nicotin-
`amide and tetracycline group included gastrointestinal
`upset (two patients) and transient renal failure (one pa-
`tient). In the prednisone group, there was one occur-
`rence each of hypertension, erosive gastritis, multiple de-
`cubitus ulcers, osteomyelitis, deep venous thrombosis,
`and death related to sepsis. Two patients required insu-
`lin therapy for hyperglycemia.
`
`Conclusions: The combination of nicotinamide and tet-
`racycline appears to be a useful alternative to systemic
`steroids in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid.
`
`(Arch Dennatol. 1994;130:753-758)
`
`ULLOUS PEMPHIGOID (BP) is
`a chronic autoimmune blis-
`tering disease that is char-
`acterized by erythematous
`plaques, vesicles, and tense
`bullae that typically begin in the sixth or
`seventh decade. Traditional therapies used
`in BP include systemic corticosteroids and
`cytotoxic agents. 1 Other agents reported
`as efficacious include dapsone, cyclospo-
`rine, erythromycin, and tetracycline. 1-5 An
`effective steroid-sparing regimen could po-
`tentially benefit elderly patients with BP
`by helping to reduce the steroid-related side
`effects to which this population is prone.
`Recently, Berk and Lorincz6 presented four
`patients with BP treated effectively with-
`out steroids with a combination of nico-
`tinamide and tetracycline. 6
`We have treated a series of 20 pa-
`
`ARCH DERMATOUVOL 130, JUNE 1994
`753
`
`tients with BP in a nonrandomized fash-
`ion with the combination of nicotin-
`amide and tetracycline and found it to be
`effective. We, therefore, initiated a ran-
`domized, open-label trial to compare the
`efficacy of the combination of nicotin-
`amide and tetracycline with prednisone in
`the treatment ofBP. In this article, were-
`view our experience with the combina-
`tion of nicotinamide and tetracycline in 20
`patients enrolled in this randomized trial.
`The short-term and long-term effective-
`ness and safety of this combination therapy
`
`See Patients and Methods
`on next page
`
`From the Department of
`Dennatology, Hemy Ford
`Hospital, Detroit, Mich
`(Drs Fivenson, Rosen, and
`Hersh), and the Department
`of Dennatology, University
`of Cincinnati (Ohio)
`(Drs Breneman, Cardone, and
`Mutasim).
`
`Exh. 1063
`
`

`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`PATIENTS
`
`The study design was that of an open-label randomized trial
`comparing the combination of nicotinamide and tetracy-
`cline with prednisone in the treatment ofBP. The study pro-
`tocol was approved by the institutional review boards at
`Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich, and the University of
`Cincinnati (Ohio) Medical Center. Treatment was divided
`into two phases: an 8-week acute phase with fixed drug dos-
`ages and a 10-month follow-up period. The inclusion cri-
`teria included diagnosis of BP by clinical, histologic, and
`immunofluorescence findings, a minimum of eight le-
`sions (bullae, urticaria, or erosions/crusts), and no sys-
`temic therapy within 2 weeks of enrollment. The exclu-
`sion criteria included a history of positive tuberculin skin
`test without treatment, cicatricial pemphigoid, or poorly
`controlled systemic diseases in which therapy with pred-
`nisone, nicotinamide, or tetracycline therapy was contra-
`indicated.
`Patients were randomized into one of two treatment
`groups: nicotinamide, 500 mg, three times daily, plus tet-
`racycline, 500 mg, four times daily, or prednisone 40 to 80
`mg/d. Minocycline, 100 mg, twice daily was substituted if
`excessive gastrointestinal upset was noted with tetracy-
`cline.
`Patients were seen weekly for 2 weeks, then biweekly
`for 2 months, then monthly for the remainder of 1 year.
`On each visit, the number of bullous, crusted, and urti-
`carial lesions on each patient were counted and plotted on
`cutaneous maps, one for lesions less than 1 em in diameter
`and one for lesions more than 1 em in diameter. The fol-
`lowing scale was used: 0, no lesions; 1 +, one to five le-
`sions; 2 +, six to 10 lesions; 3 +, 11 to 20 lesions; 4 +, 21 to
`40 lesions; and 5 +, more than 40 lesions.
`Pruritus and the physician's global assessment were
`
`also recorded at each visit. Pruritus was assessed as fol-
`lows: 0, no pruritus or burning; 1, mild pruritus or burn-
`ing (occasionally noticeable); 2, moderate pruritus or burn-
`ing (present but did not interfere with daily activity or sleep);
`and 3, severe pruritus or burning (interference with daily
`activities and/or sleep). The physician's global assessment
`was rated with respect to baseline presentation as follows:
`-3, markedly worse; -2, somewhat worse; -1, slightly
`worse; 0, no change; 1 +,slightly better; 2 +,somewhat bet-
`ter; 3 +, markedly better; and 4+, clinical remission.
`The patient's blood pressure, complete blood cell count,
`and alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase,
`serum electrolytes, serum urea nitrogen, and creatinine con-
`centrations were obtained-at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12,
`and then at 3-month intervals. A chest roentgenogram and
`a skin anergy panel (including a tuberculin skin test anti-
`gen) were obtained prior to treatment.
`Response categories were defined after 8 weeks of treat-
`ment as complete response, complete clearing of all le-
`sions; partial response, at least 50% clearing of lesions; no
`response, less than 25% clearing; and worsening, progres-
`sion of disease. During the follow-up period, disease re-
`currence was recorded if any new bullae, urticaria, or ero-
`sions and/or crusts were noted.
`
`STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
`
`The differences in numbers of bullous, crusted, and urti-
`carial skin lesions ofless than 1 em or more than 1 em were
`calculated between 1 week and baseline, 2 weeks and base-
`line, and 4 weeks and baseline, to adjust for the baseline
`conditions of the patients. The groups were then com-
`pared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests on the differences.
`Wilcoxon rank sum tests were also used to compare pru-
`ritus and global assessment between the two treatment
`groups. P values less than or equal to .01 were considered
`to be statistically significant. P values between .01 and .05
`were considered to be "borderline" significant.
`
`in the treatment of both localized and generalized BP are
`demonstrated.
`
`~
`
`"
`
`~
`
`RES"U.H1l'ill?v~,:"' ~, v '
`
`Twenty patients were enrolled between the two study cen-
`ters. This included six men between the ages of 69 and
`89 years and 14 women between the ages of 52 and 91
`years. There were 14 whites and six blacks in the study
`population. Fourteen patients were randomized to treat-
`ment with nicotinamide and tetracycline and six to pred-
`nisone treatment. The study was originally designed to
`randomize a total of 96 patients, with approximately 24
`in each treatment arm at each center. The study was ter-
`minated after the 20 patients presented were enrolled; a
`randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial has since been
`initiated. During the acute phase of the trial, there were
`
`five complete responses, five partial responses, one no
`response, and one worsening in the nicotinamide and tet-
`racycline group and one complete response and five par-
`tial responses in the prednisone group. Two patients in
`the nicotinamide/tetracycline group were unavailable for
`follow-up (Table 1 ).
`There was a general trend toward improvement in
`both groups in lesion counts, pruritus, and global as-
`sessment. Both treatment groups had rapid resolution of
`
`See also pages 7 48 and 781
`
`bullous and urticarial lesions in patients who achieved
`complete response or partial response. The mean pruri-
`tus score on enrollment was 2.0 for both the nicotinamide/
`tetracycline group and the prednisone group and de-
`
`ARCH DERMATOUVOL 130, JUNE 1994
`754
`
`Exh. 1063
`
`

`
`Table 1. Comparison of Patient Demographics and Responses to Therapy During the Acute Phase of a Randomized Trial of
`Nicotinamide/Tetracycline vs Prednisone in the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid*

`
`Bullous
`>40
`>40
`0
`>20
`
`15
`>40
`>40
`>40
`>40
`5
`3
`15
`8
`0
`11
`0
`15
`
`lesions
`
`Crusted
`>40
`>40
`35
`>10
`
`30
`0
`>40
`>40
`>40
`30
`3
`>40
`3
`30
`>40
`>40
`>40
`
`Urticarial
`>40
`0
`0
`20
`
`0
`>40
`5
`0
`0
`>40
`18
`11
`>40
`3
`0
`8
`>40
`
`';'t·
`
`Treatment
`Regimen, mg/dt
`Prednisone 80
`Prednisone 80
`Prednisone 40
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`
`Tetracycline/nicotjnamidet
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide§
`Prednisone 60
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide§
`Prednisone 40
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`Prednisone 60
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`
`Patient
`
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`
`Age, y/
`Sex/Race
`77/M/W
`82/F/B
`88/F/W
`70/F/8
`
`69/M/B
`76/M/W
`89/M/W
`90/F/W
`85/F/W
`74/M/W
`73/F/W
`61/F/8
`90/F/W
`75/F/W
`81/M/W
`78/F/8
`78/F/8
`
`Response
`PR
`PR
`PR
`Unavailable for
`follow-up
`PR
`PR
`NR
`CR
`PR
`CR
`PR
`CR
`CR
`PR
`w
`PR
`Unavailable for
`follow-up
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`>40
`>40
`>40
`52/F/W
`CR
`18
`3
`6
`18
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`78/F/W
`PR
`19
`25
`>40
`>40
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide
`91/F/W
`CR
`20
`* CR indicates complete response, complete clearing after 8 weeks or less; PR, partial response, at least 50% clearing after 8 weeks; NR, no response, less
`than 25% clearing or worse after 8 weeks; and W, worsening or disease progression after 8 weeks.
`t Tetracycline, 500 mg tour times daily plus nicotinamide, 500 mg three times daily, or prednisone, 40 to 80 mg/d.
`tStopped after 4 weeks due to renal failure.
`§Minocycline substituted tor tetracycline due to gastrointestinal upset.
`
`creased to 1.5 and 1.0, respectively, at 2 weeks and 1.2
`and 0.2, respectively, at 4 weeks. The physician's global
`assessment followed a similar trend in both patient groups
`as well. Statistical comparison revealed no significant dif-
`ferences between the two treatment groups in the reduc-
`tion in numbers of skin lesions (P values ranged from
`.13 to .96 at 1, 2, and 4 weeks of therapy). Prednisone
`showed borderline significance in reducing the number
`of bullous lesions of more than 1 em after 1 week of treat-
`ment compared with the nicotinamide/tetracycline com-
`bination (P=.017). There were also no significant differ-
`ences between treatment group responses for pruritus
`(P=.32, P=.81) or the physician's global assessment (P=.40,
`P=.83) at any time point in the acute phase of the trial.
`The Fiigurre graphically demonstrates the similarity in
`responses to nicotinamide/tetracycline vs prednisone over
`time for the evaluation of skin lesions, pruritus, and the
`physician's global assessment.
`Table 1 demonstrates that not only was the combi-
`nation of tetracycline and nicotinamide efficacious in treat-
`ing localized or limited BP (patients 5, 11, 13, and 19),
`but it was also effective in patients with extensive dis-
`ease (patients 6, 8, 9, 18, and 20). Several patients with
`an excess of 100 bullae and/or erosions had their disease
`
`successfully controlled within 2 to 4 weeks of initiating
`tetracycline and nicotinamide therapy.
`
`LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP
`
`The mean follow-up period was 21.3 weeks in the
`prednisone patients and 17.5 weeks in the
`nicotinamide/tetracycline patients. Eight patients
`maintained regular follow-up visits for 22 weeks or
`longer and their treatment courses and outcome are
`summarized in Table 2. Two of three prednisone-
`treated patients had repeated disease flare-ups with ta-
`pering of medication. Five patients in the nicotin-
`amide and tetracycline group remained in complete
`response for 22, 28, 42, 50, and 54 weeks of observa-
`tion while being tapered off treatment.
`
`ADVERSE EFFECTS
`
`Two patients in the nicotinamide and tetracycline
`group reported gastrointestinal upset and responded
`well to the substitution of minocycline at 100 mg
`twice daily for tetracycline. Both of these patients de-
`veloped minocycline-related hyperpigmentation
`
`ARCH DERMATOUVOL 130, JUNE 1994
`755
`
`Exh. 1063
`
`

`
`~ Acute Phase _,
`
`4
`
`10
`
`14
`12
`Time, wk
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`28
`
`~ Acute Phase _,
`
`12
`11
`10
`9
`8
`Q) 7 8 6
`c: 5
`0 ·u; 4 ~
`3
`2
`1
`0
`
`C/)
`
`~
`
`8 C/)
`en
`:::J
`.§
`a:
`
`4
`
`10
`
`12
`
`14
`Time, wk
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`28
`
`~ Acute Phase _,
`
`4
`
`~
`
`8 C/)
`
`c: I .;£
`
`E 0
`C!i
`
`Top, Mean lesion scores of bullous pemphigoid patients
`treated with prednisone vs the combination of
`nicotinamide and tetracycline in a randomized, open-label
`trial. Patients received a fixed dose of prednisone (solid
`circles) (40 to 80 mg/d [n=6}) or 500 mg of
`nicotinamide (open diamonds) twice daily plus 500 mg
`of tetracycline four times daily (nicotinamide/tetracycline
`[n=2}) tor 8 weeks during the acute phase of the study
`and were then tapered individually. The lesion score
`represented is the mean score for each treatment group
`of the sum total score of bullous, urticarial, and crust
`lesions both less than 1 em and more than 1 em in
`diameter. Skin lesions were scored on the following
`scale: 0, no lesions; 1 +, one to five lesions; 2+, six
`lesions; 3+, 11 to 20 lesions; 4+, 21 to 40 lesions; 5+,
`more than 40 lesions, thus the maximum score was 30
`for any patient. The P values between the prednisone
`and nicotinamide/tetracycline groups at 1, 2, and 4
`weeks were .61, .96, and .78, respectively. Center, Mean
`pruritus scores of the same patients as in the top part of
`the Figure. Pruritus was scored on the following scale: 0,
`no pruritus or burning; 1, mild pruritus or burning
`(occasionally noticeable); 2, moderate pruritus or
`burning (present, but not interfering with daily activities
`or sleep); and 3, severe pruritus or burning (interfering
`with daily activities and/or sleep). The P values between
`the prednisone (solid circles) and
`nicotinamide/tetracycline (open diamonds) groups at 1,
`2, and 4 weeks were .81, .45, and .32, respectively.
`Bottom, Mean physician's global assessment scores of
`the same patients as in the top and center parts of the
`Figure. Physician's global assessment was scored on the
`following score: the physician's global assessment was
`rated with respect to baseline presentation as follows:
`- 3, markedly worse; -2,. somewhat worse;
`1, slightly
`worse; 0, no change; 1+, slightly better; 2+, somewhat
`better; 3+, markedly better; and 4+, clinical remission .
`The P values between the prednisone (solid circles) and
`nicotinamide/tetracycline (open diamonds) groups at 1,
`2, and 4 weeks were .83, .40, and .40, respectively.
`
`4
`
`6
`
`10
`
`12. 14
`Time, wk
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`26
`
`28
`
`within areas of old blisters and have been reported
`elsewhere. 7 One of these patients treated with minocy-
`cline also developed tinnitus, which resolved after 1
`month despite continued treatment. One patient was
`enrolled with elevated serum creatinine and serum
`urea nitrogen concentration (serum urea nitrogen,
`12.9 mmol/L [3.6 to 8.9 mmol!L] ;_creatinine, 159
`~J..mol!L [ < 133 ~J..mol!L]) and developed acute tubular
`necrosis after 4 weeks of nicotinamide and tetracycline
`therapy. His peak creatinine level was 654 ~J..mol!L and
`renal function returned to baseline within 2 weeks of
`discontinuation of nicotinamide and tetracycline
`therapy. This patient was also taking nonsteroidal
`anti-inflammatory medications (ibuprofen and aspi-
`rin) at the time renal failure was diagnosed. No other
`significant serologic or hematologic abnormalities
`were noted in the nicotinamide and tetracycline
`group.
`In the prednisone group, there was one occurrence
`each of hypertension (after week 9 of therapy), osteo-
`
`myelitis of the toe (after week 7), multiple decubitus ul-
`cers (after week 18), and deep venous thrombosis and
`erosive gastritis (after week 12). There was also one death
`in the prednisone group due to sepsis complicated by as-
`piration pneumonia. Two patients developed hypergly-
`cemia necessitating supplemental insulin therapy.
`
`Treatment of BP has historically involved systemic cor-
`ticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. 1 Because pa-
`tients are often elderly, they are more prone to suffer from
`a number of other medical problems such as diabetes,
`hypertension, congestive heart failure, and osteoporosis
`that place them at higher risk for developing side effects
`from systemic corticosteroid therapy. Berk and Lorincz6
`initially reported successful treatment of four patients with
`BP using the combination in 1986.6 In preliminary ex-
`periences at our institutions using nicotinamide and tet-
`racycline in treating 20 patients with BP, we found this
`
`ARCH DERMATOUVOL 130, JUNE 1994
`756
`
`Exh. 1063
`
`

`
`Table 2. long-term Follow-up Results and Complications in Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid Treated With Nicotinamide
`and Tetracycline vs Prednisone*
`
`Patient
`
`Treatment Regiment
`Prednisone, taper
`
`Follow-up
`Period, wk
`42
`
`8
`10
`11
`
`12
`13
`
`16
`18
`
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide, taper
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide, taper
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide, taper
`
`Prednisone, taper
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide, taper
`
`Prednisone, taper
`Tetracycline/nicotinamide, taper
`
`50
`28
`42
`
`26
`22
`
`34
`54
`
`Outcome
`PR, repeated flares
`of diseastl, ·
`CR
`CR
`Flare week 12, add 4 week
`prednisone taper
`Flare, week 25
`CR
`
`PR
`CR
`
`Complications
`Decubitus ulcers,
`weeks 18 and 38
`None
`None
`Herpes zoster, week 18
`
`None
`Gastrointestinal upset,
`tetracycline changed to
`minocycline, week 4
`Hypertension, week 9
`None
`
`*CR indicates complete response, complete clearing after 8 weeks or more; PR, partial response, at least 50% clearing after 8 weeks; NR, no response,
`less than 25% clearing or worse after 8 weeks; and W, worsening, after 8 weeks or progression.
`t Tetracycline, 500 mg tour times daily plus nicotinamide, 500 mg three times daily, or prednisone; 40 to 80 mg/d.
`
`combination an effective alternative therapy to systemic
`steroids in the majority of patients (unpublished obser-
`vations). These uncontrolled observations led to the pre-
`sent randomized, open-label trial comparing nicotin-
`amide and tetracycline with prednisone in the treatment
`ofBP.
`The results of our uncontrolled observations and this
`randomized trial suggest that the combination of nico-
`tinamide and tetracycline may be a useful alternative for
`first-line therapy in the acute treatment ofBP. Although
`the number of patients studied was not large, these re-
`sults suggest comparable efficacy for the nicotinamide/
`tetracycline combination with prednisone in the treat-
`ment ofBP. The efficacy of nicotinamide/tetracycline was
`independent of the number of lesions, as no correlation
`was observed between the extent of disease and the abil-
`ity to respond to the nicotinamide and tetracycline
`combination.
`In this group of patients, fewer short-term and long-
`term adverse effects occurred in the patients treated with
`the nicotinamide/tetracycline combination compared with
`prednisone therapy. Five of six patients randomized to
`prednisone developed major complications while receiv-
`ing therapy including hypertension, decubitus ulcers, ero-
`sive gastritis, and serious infections, with one death due
`to sepsis. These underscore the potential toxic effects of
`corticosteroid therapy in patients with BP. In compari-
`son, fewer significant adverse effects occurred with nico-
`tinamide/tetracycline therapy. Those patients with gas-
`trointestinal upset had complete amelioration with
`minocycline substitution for tetracycline while main-
`taining comparable efficacy. Only the one patient treated
`with this combination who developed acute tubular ne-
`crosis (patient 5) was withdrawn from the study due to
`a side effect. This occurrence has lead us to recommend
`
`exclusion of patients with a serum creatinine level of more
`than 177 1-1mol/L or a serum urea nitrogen level of more
`than 14.3 mmol/L from being treated with nicotinamide/
`tetracycline as well as avoidance of other potentially neph-
`rotoxic drugs (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medi-
`cations). The pathophysiology of renal failure due to
`tetracycline in patients with baseline mild renal insuffi-
`ciency involves decreased clearance of tetracycline with
`resulting accumulation of toxic metabolites in the renal
`tubules. 8·9 Minocycline, which is metabolized in the liver
`prior to renal excretion, is considered a safe alternative
`to tetracycline in patients with mild renal insuffi-
`ciency.8·9
`Potential adverse effects reported with nicotin-
`amide therapy include hepatotoxicity, pruritus, and flush-
`ing; these have generally been reported in patients tak-
`ing a much higher dose than those used in this study.
`Tetracycline has been associated with gastrointestinal up-
`set, hepatotoxicity, and phototoxicity.8-10 Long-term sys-
`temic corticosteroid therapy is associated with osteopo-
`rosis, weight gain, cataracts, hyperglycemia,
`gastrointestinal ulcers, myopathy, hypertension, and psy-
`chosis in addition to the septic complications and poor
`wound healing seen in this study.U Thus, both the ob-
`served and expected side-effect profiles for nicotinamide/
`tetracycline therapy appear to be more tolerable for the
`elderly patient with BP than those for prednisone.
`There are a variety of proposed mechanisms for the
`therapeutic effects of nicotinamide and tetracycline in BP.
`Nicotinamide may exert its therapeutic function via elec-
`tron scavenging, 12 inhibition of phosphodiesterase, 13
`and/or increased tryptophan conversion to seroto-
`nin.14·15 Nicotinamide also has direct antihistamine re-
`ceptor effects as well as effects inhibiting histamine re-
`lease, 16-20 and BP has been shown to have blister fluid
`
`ARCH DERMATOLIVOL 130, JUNE 1994
`757
`
`Exh. 1063
`
`

`
`characterized by increased levels of histamine. 21 Both nico-
`tinamide and tetracycline inhibit neutrophil and eosino-
`phil chemotaxis and secretion. 6•20•22-25 As BP is charac-
`terized by a subepidermal blister, often rich in eosinophils
`and neutrophils, inhibition of chemotaxis of these cells
`by nicotinamide and tetracycline is one of the more likely
`mechanisms of action. Other mechanisms of action in-
`clude the effect of nicotinamide on gene regulation and
`suppression of lymphocyte transformation. 26-28 Tetracy-
`cline has also been reported to experimentally increase
`cohesion of the epidermal basement membrane zone. 29
`We present data from a randomized, open-label trial
`showing that nicotinamide combined with tetracycline
`is a useful alternative to systemic steroids in the treat-
`ment of BP. The mechanism of action for this combina-
`tion is unknown but may involve some down-regulation
`of antigen-induced lymphocyte transformation, inhibi-
`tion of leukocyte chemotaxis, and/or inhibition of his-
`tamine release. These findings will need to be confirmed
`in a randomized, double-blind study, which is currently
`underway. This novel and inexpensive combination may
`offer advantages to older patients by avoiding some of
`the toxic effects of systemic steroids without significant
`loss of efficacy.
`
`Accepted for publication july 8, 1993.
`This study was supported in part by a grant from
`the Food and Drug Administration-Orphan Products
`Development Office, Detroit, Mich (No. FDU-000651)
`(Dr Fivenson).
`Presented in part at the American Academy of Der-
`matology Summer Session, June 13, 1991, Monterey,
`Calif, and before the annual meeting of the Ohio Derma-
`tological Association, September 15, 1991, Columbus.
`Reprint requests to the Department of Dermatology,
`Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI
`48202 (Dr Fivenson).
`
`1. Korman N. Bullous pemphigoid. JAm Acad Dermatol. 1987;16:907-924.
`2. Person JR, Rogers RS. Bullous pemphigoid responding to sulfapyridine and
`the sulfones. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:61 0-615.
`3. Fox BJ, Odom RB, Findlay RF. Erythromycin therapy in bullous pemphigoid:
`possible anti-inflammatory effects. JAm Acad Dermato/. 1982;7:504-519.
`4. Thornfeldt CR, Menkes AW. Bullous pemphigoid controlled by tetracycline.
`JAm Acad Derma to/. 1987;16:305-31 0.
`
`5. Thomas I, Khorenian S, Arbesfeld DM. Treatment of generalized bullous pem-
`phigoid with oral tetracycline. JAm Acad Dermatol. 1993;28:74-77.
`6. Berk NA, Lorincz AL. The treatment of bullous pemphigoid with tetracycline
`and niacinamide. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:670-674.
`7. Altman DA, Fivenson DP, Lee MW. Minocycline hyperpigmentation as a model
`for in situ phagocytosis by factor Xllla positive dermal dendrocytes. J Cutan
`Patho/. 1992;19:340-345.
`8. Dukes MNG. Meyler's Side Effects of Drugs. 9th ed. Princeton, NJ: Excerpta
`Medica; 1980.
`9. Cunha BA, Comer JB, Jonas M. The tetracyclines. Med Clin North Am. 1982;
`66:293-302.
`10. Zackheim HS, Vasily DB, Westphal MC, Hastings CW. Reactions to nicotin-
`amide. JAm Acad Dermatol. 1981 ;6:736-737.
`11. Axelrod L. Glucocorticoid therapy. Medicine. 1976;55:39-65.
`12. Wilson GL, Patton NJ, McCord JM, Mullins DW, Mossman BT. Mechanisms of
`streptozotocin- and alloxan-induced damage in rat B cells. Diabeto/ogia. 1984;
`27:587-591.
`13. Shinmoyama M, Kawai M, Hoshi Y, Veda I. Nicotinamide inhibition of 3', 5'
`cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972;
`49:1137-1141.
`14. Scherer B, Kromer W. Influence of niacinamide administration on brain 5-HT
`and a possible mode of action. Life Sci. 1972;11:189-195.
`15. Hoffer A. LSD-induced psychosis and vitamin B3. Am J Psychiatry. 1972;128:
`1155.
`16. Cohen BM. A niacinamide-theophylline compound (RC-C-144), human and blood
`level studies. J Asthma Res. 1966;4:75-79.
`17. Cohen BM. A niacinamide-theophylline compound (RC-C-144), clinical and spi-
`rometric effects. J Asthma Res. 1966;4:81-87.
`18. Bekier E, Maslinski C. Antihistaminic action of nicotinamide. Agents Action.
`197 4;4:196.
`19. Wyczolkowska J, Maslinski C. Inhibition by nicotinamide of an homologous
`PCA reaction and antigen-induced histamine release from rat peritoneal cells.
`tnt Arch Allergy App//mmuno/. 1975;49:285-292.
`20. Bekier E, Wyczolkowska J, Szych H, Maslinski C. The inhibitory effect of nico-
`tinamide on asthma-like symptoms and eosinophilia in guinea pigs, anaphy-
`lactic mast cell degranulation in mice, and histamine release from rat perito-
`neal mast cells by compound 48/80. tnt Arch Allergy App/lmmunol. 1974;47:
`737-748.
`21. Katayama I, Doi T, Nishioka K. High histamine level in the blister fluid of bul-
`lous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol Res. 1984;276:126-127.
`22. Forsgren A, Schmeling D, Ouie PF. Effect of tetracycline on the phagocytic
`function of human leukocytes. J Infect Dis. 1974;130:412-415.
`23. Majeski JA, Alexander JW. Evaluation of tetracycline in the neutrophil chemo-
`tactic response. J Lab C/in Med. 1977;90:259-265.
`24. Esterly NB, Furey NL, Flanagan LE. The effect of antimicrobial agents on leu-
`kocyte chemotaxis. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;70:51-55.
`25. Esterly NB, Koransky JS, Furey NL, Trevisan M. Neutrophil chemotaxis in pa-
`tients with acne receiving oral tetracycline therapy. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:
`1308-1313.
`26. Burger DR, Vandenbark AA, Daves D,Anderson WA, Vetto RM, Finke P. Nico-
`tinamide: suppression of lymphocytic transformation with a component iden-
`tified in human transfer factor. J lmmuno/. 1976;117:797 -801.
`27. Thong YH, Ferrante A. Inhibition of mitogen induced human lymphocyte prolif-
`erative responses to tetracycline analogues. Clin Exp lmmunol. 1979;35:443-446.
`28. Banck G, Forsgren A. Antibiotics and suppression of lymphocyte function in
`vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979;16:554-560.
`29. Humbert P, Renaud A, Millet J, et al. Evaluation of the effect of heparin and
`tetracycline on the cohesion of the dermal-epidermal junction. Acta Derm Ve-
`nereal. 1989;69:434-436.
`
`ARCH DERMATOUVOL 130, JUNE 1994
`758
`
`Exh. 1063

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket