throbber
- O
`‘xv
` €‘RMATOV‘
`
`D9"MaT0'-0
`
`CME affi¢|,ée‘
`Cutaneous markers‘ of in_ternal‘ma|i'gnanéyj; 3;
`_
`I. Malignant involvement of the skin and,t_he genAodermat9s_e:s..{-:-=1
`'
`:* STACIA POOLE, MD, and NEIL A. VVFEKISKE, MD T,ar!1Ap5a,'Fl()ArV_i”(Vi‘$E-:'T
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`Dr. Reddy‘s Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories. Inc.
`IPR2015-
`Exhibit 1062
`
`-.3.
`
`___,_,
`
`

`
`_
`
`‘
`
`V
`
`1
`
`‘
`
`Cutaneous r»nVa.1‘rkerS7_L()‘_f iri‘tVe"rLn al- ‘r;n_a’l|gnV
`V
`,
`T

`pf I. Malignant invqlvement of the skin and th,‘e geno
`‘
`SEACIA POQVLVVVE, MD,’ and NEIL AQWFENSKE, MD
`
`‘ 1062
`
`Exh. 1062
`
`

`
`Kirsner et a/.
`
`Journal or me
`American Academy of
`Dermatology
`
`cal correlations, and a review of the literature. Am J Clin
`Pathol1972;58:524-30.
`9. MartinS. Cryofibrinogenemia, monoclonal gammopathy,
`and purpura. Arch Dermatol1979;115:208-11.
`10. Jager BV. Cryofibrinogenemia. N Engl J Med 1962;266:
`579-83.
`11. Ritzman SE, Levin WC. Cryopathies: a review. Arch In-
`tern Med 1961;107:186-204.
`12. Kalbfleisch JM, Bird RM. Cryofibrinogenemia. N Engl J
`Med 1960;263:881-6.
`13. Rachmilewitz EA, Sacks MI, Zlotnik A. Essential cryofi-
`brinogenemia: clinical pathological and immunological
`studies. Isr J Med Sci 1970;6:32-43.
`14. Copeman PWM. Cryo:fibrinogenaemia and skin ulcers:
`
`treatment with plasmapheresis [Abstract]. Br J Dermatol
`1979;101(suppl17):57.
`15. Jarrett PEM, Morland M, Clemenson G. Treatment of
`Raynaud's syndrome with stanozolol [Abstract]. Br J Surg
`"'
`1975;62:654.
`16. Ayres ML, Jarrett PEM, Browse NL. Blood viscosity,
`Raynaud's phenomenon and the effect of fibrinolytic en-
`hancement. Br J Surg 1981;68:51-4.
`17. Davidson JF, Lochhead M, McDonald GA, et al. Fibrin-
`olytic enhancement by stanozolol: a double blind trial. Br
`J Haematol1972;22:543-59.
`18. Glazer G. Atherogenic effects of anabolic steroids on serum
`lipid levels. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1925-33.
`
`Treatment of generalized bullous pemphigoid with
`oral tetracycline
`Isabelle Thomas, MD, Sylvie Khorenian, MD, and David M. Arbesfeld, MD
`Newark, New Jersey
`
`Background: Although bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a benign self-limited disease, the main-
`stay of treatment remains systemic steroids, often in combination with immunosuppressive
`agents. This therapy has considerable potential toxicity, particularly in elderly patients with
`preexisting problems.
`Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral tetracycline as first-
`choice therapy in patients with BP.
`Methods: Every patient newly diagnosed with generalized BP was treated with oral tetracy-
`cline and a midpotency topical steroid.
`Results: In all five patients, blister formation was stopped and reepithelialization completed
`within 1 to 3 weeks. There was no relapse or toxicity noted; follow-up ranged from 16 to 24
`months.
`Conclusion: Oral tetracycline was found to be rapidly efficacious in all patients and devoid
`of toxicity.
`(JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1993;28:74-7.)
`
`Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune dis-
`order that tends to affect elderly persons who
`frequently have preexisting medical problems. Its
`course is relatively benign and, unlike pemphigus
`vulgaris, rarely life-threatening, even without treat-
`ment.1 However, the tendency has been to treat
`these patients with systemic steroids in a manner
`similar to pemphigus. As a result, the side effects re-
`sulting from therapy often tend to be more severe
`than the disease itself. In the present study, in an at-
`tempt to avoid systemic steroids, we treated every
`
`From the New Jersey Medical School and the Dermatology Service,
`East Orange Veterans Administration Medical Center.
`No reprints available.
`16/1/41471
`
`patient with a confirmed diagnosis of BP with oral
`tetracycline and midpotency topical steroids.
`METHODS
`The diagnosis was based on clinical examination and
`histologic and direct and indirect immunofluorescence
`studies. Patients were observed weekly until blister for-
`mation stopped, monthly until therapy was discontinued
`and then every 6 months.

`
`RESULTS
`The case reports are summarized in Tables I and
`II. All patients were men, which reflects the patient
`population seen at our medical center. Three were
`black and two white. Age of the patients ranged
`from 63 to 84 years (mean 71 years). Duration of
`
`74
`
`0190-9622/93 f$1.00 + .10
`
`Exh. 1062
`
`

`
`Volume 28
`Number 1
`January 1993
`
`Oral tetracycline for bullous pemphigoid 15
`
`Table I. Characteristics of the patients
`Patient
`No.
`
`Medical history
`
`Medications
`
`Lesions
`
`Multiple
`Face, neck
`Extremities
`Trunk
`Multiple
`Trunk
`Extremities
`
`Multiple
`Neck
`Trunk
`Extremities
`Mouth (one)
`
`Multiple
`Trunk
`Extremities
`Scattered
`Trunk
`Extremities
`
`63
`
`70
`
`Male
`
`Male
`
`75
`
`Male
`
`Hypertension
`Right CVA
`Left hemiparesis
`Seizures
`Hypertension
`Bilateral CV A
`CHF
`Dementia
`ITP
`Hypertension
`Arrhythmia
`Abdominal
`aortic aneurysm
`Diabetes mellitus
`
`Male
`
`Unremarkable
`
`HCTZ}:
`Isosorbide
`Phenytoin
`Hydroxyzine
`HCTZ
`Phenytoin
`Danazol
`Prednisone
`20 mg q.d.*
`HCTZ
`Captopril
`Nitroglycerin
`Dipyridamole
`Acetylsalicylic
`acid
`None
`
`Male
`
`Hypertension
`Left CVA
`
`HCTZ
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`63
`
`84
`
`CHF, Congestive heart failure; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; HCTZ, hydrochlorothiazide; ITP, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.
`*Administered for ITP.
`
`disease was 3 weeks to 6 months before the initiation
`of tetracycline. Four patients had hypertension
`complicated by cerebrovascular accidents in three
`patients. One had diabetes mellitus. Lesions were
`generalized in all patients, but less numerous in one.
`In all cases, the histologic findings were consistent
`with the diagnosis of BP, showing a subepidermal
`bulla with a mixed dermal inflammatory infiltrate
`made of mononuclear cells and eosinophils. Direct
`immunofluorescence was positive in all cases, with a
`linear deposition of IgG and C3. Indirect immuno-
`fluorescence was positive in three cases and negative
`in two. Except for one patient, all were treated with
`tetracycline, 2 gm daily, and a midpotency topical
`steroid cream. Bulla formation was significantly re-
`duced within 1 week and stopped within 1 to 3 weeks.
`Complete reepithelialization was noted after 1 to 3
`weeks. The 2 gm dosage was maintained for 1 to 2
`months, decreased by 500 mg decrements every
`month, and then stopped. All patients are in remis-
`sion at this time; there has been no relapse, except in
`one patient for whom tetracycline was discontinued
`too soon. Follow-up after discontinuation of tetra-
`cycline ranges from 16 to 24 months. No toxicity or
`morbidity was noted.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Until Lever's description in 1953,2 BP had been
`grouped with pemphigus vulgaris. In 1967, in con-
`firmation of Lever's hypothesis, Jordon et al.3 de-
`fined both disorders as distinct immunologic entities.
`Unlike pemphigus vulgaris in which the mortality
`rate was high (90%) before the steroid era, the nat-
`ural course of BP tends to be more benign and less
`protracted. It rarely lasts more than 5 to 6 years and
`has a low mortality rate even if untreated. BP is
`characterized by spontaneous remissions and exac-
`erbations; relapses are easily controlled.4 However,
`to date systemic steroids remain the mainstay of
`therapy for generalized disease.5 To reduce the dose
`of steroids and their side effects, immunosuppressive
`agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide,
`methotrexate, or chlorambucil with their own po-
`tential toxicity are frequently used, sometimes from
`the onset.
`It seems that in many cases the toxicity resulting
`from treatment is disproportionate to the low risk
`from the disease itself. Only recently have more be-
`nign treatments been reported. Erythromycin has
`been used in a few cases since 1982, but results are
`inconclusive. 6, 7 Topical steroids have generally been
`
`Exh. 1062
`
`

`
`7 6 Thomas et a!.
`
`Table II. Therapy and results
`
`Patient
`No.
`
`Disease duration
`(mo)
`
`4mo
`
`2
`
`Unknown
`
`3
`
`1 mo
`
`4
`
`5
`
`1 mo
`
`6mo
`
`Betamethasone
`valerate 0.1%
`cream X 1 wk
`Betamethasone
`dipropionate 0.05%
`cream-TCN X 1
`n;w, 2 gm X 2 mo,
`1.5 gm X 2 mo, 1
`gm X 2 mo, 500
`mg X 2 mo, then
`stopped
`Fluocinonide 0.05%
`ointment
`TCN 2 gm X 1 mo,
`1.5 gm X 1 mo, 1
`gm X 1 mo, 500
`mg X 1 mo, then
`stopped
`Fluocinonide 0.05%
`ointment
`TCN 2 gm X 1 mo,
`then stopped
`TCN 2 gm X 1 mo,
`1.5 gm X 1 mo, 1
`gm X 1 mo, 500
`mg X 1 mo, then
`stopped
`Fluocinonide 0.05%
`ointment
`TCN 2 gm X 1 mo,
`1.5 gm X 1 mo, 1
`gm X 1 mo, 500
`mg X 1 mo, then
`stopped
`Fluocinonide 0.05%
`ointment alone
`TCNX4mo
`TCN 1 gm X 2 mo,
`500mgX 2 mo,
`then stopped
`
`Results
`
`Treatment
`
`Blisters
`
`Reepithelialization
`
`None at 3 wk
`
`3 wk
`
`Journal of the
`American Academy of
`Dermatology
`
`FoUow-up after
`discontinuation
`ofTeN
`
`16 mo, no
`relapse to date
`
`None at 1 wk
`
`2wk
`
`None at 1 wk
`
`2wk
`
`None at 1 wk
`
`1 wk
`
`16 mo, died of
`gastrointestinal
`bleeding
`
`Mild flare at
`2 wk after
`discontinuation
`ofTCN
`24mo
`
`None at 1 wk
`
`1 wk
`
`21 mo
`
`1 to 2 per wk
`
`Erosions
`
`None at 1 wk
`
`1 wk
`
`N/A
`
`N/A, Not applicable; TCN, tetracycline.
`
`reserved for localized disease although clobetasol
`propionate alone was reported to clear 10 patients,
`but the extent of the bullous eruption was not spec-
`ified.8
`Tetracycline alone has been used for localized
`disease9 or in combination with niacinamide. 1 0 How-
`ever, there is no publication on the use of tetracycline
`alone for generalized disease.
`
`Antibiotics such as tetracycline and erythromycin
`block bacterial synthesis by binding to the ribosomal
`30s subunit and competitively inhibit the binding of
`transfer RNA to messenger RNA. They suppress
`inflammation by inhibiting neutrophil chemotaxis
`and random migration in vitro and in vivo. 11 In BP
`they may inhibit the complement-mediated inflam-
`matory response to the basement membrane zone
`
`Exh. 1062
`
`

`
`Volume 28
`Number 1
`January 1993
`
`and mediators of the inflammatory response. In ad-
`dition, tetracycline has been shown to affect the co-
`hesion of the dermoepidermal junction.12 In rats, it
`significantly prolongs suction blister time, which
`suggests that cohesion of the dermoepidermal junc-
`tion is increased. 13
`Therapy with systemic steroids in elderly debili-
`tated patients has considerable potential toxicity.
`Deaths, particularly from bronchopneumonia asso-
`ciated with systemic steroids, are still reported in re-
`cent publications. 14-16 The use of immunosuppres-
`sive agents as steroid-sparing agents also carries its
`own potential morbidity. In addition, steroids do not
`seem to clear the bullous eruption more quickly or
`prevent relapses more effectively than tetracycline.
`It seems that it would be worth trying a more be-
`nign treatment first rather than using systemic ste-
`roids or immunosuppressive agents from the start. In
`our study all patients responded rapidly to tetracy-
`cline therapy, and there was no relapse or morbid-
`ity.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Lever WF. Pemphigus and pemphigoid. JAM ACAD DER-
`MATOL 1979;1:2-31.
`2. Lever WF. Pemphigus. Medicine 1953;32:1-123.
`3. Jordon RE, Beutner EH, Witebsky E, et al. Basement
`membrane zone antibodies in bullous pemphigoid. JAMA
`1967;200:751-6.
`
`Oral tetracycline for bullous pemphigoid 77
`
`4. Person JR, Rogers RS. Bullous and cicatricial pemphigoid.
`Mayo Clin Proc 1977;52:54-66.
`5. Korman N. Bullous pemphigoid. JAM ACAD DERMATOL
`1987;16:907-24.
`6. Fox BJ, Odom RB, Findlay RF. Erythromycin therapy in
`bullous pemphigoid: possible anti-inflammatory effects. J
`AM ACAD DERMATOL 1982;7:504-10.
`7. Rigon JL. Traitement de la pemphigoide bulleuse par
`l'erythromycine. These Nancy, 1986:1-150.
`8. Westerhof W. Treatment of bullous pemphigoid with top-
`ical clobetasol propionate. JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1989;
`20:458-61.
`9. Thornfeldt CR, Menkes AW. Bullous pemphigoid con-
`trolled by tetracycline. J AM ACAD DERMATOL 1987;
`16:305-10.
`10. Berk MA, Lorincz AL. The treatment of bullous pemphi-
`goid with tetracycline and niacinamide. Arch Dermatol
`1986;122:670-4.
`11. Esterly NB, Furey NL, Flanagan LE. The effect of
`antimicrobial agents on leukocyte chemotaxis. J Invest
`Dermatol1978;70:51-5.
`12. Humbert P, Treffel P, Chapuis J-F, et al. The tetracyclines
`in dermatology. JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1991;25:691-7.
`13. Humbert P, Renaud A, Millet J, et al. Evaluation of the ef-
`fect of heparin and tetracycline on the cohesion of the der-
`mal-epidermaljunction. Acta Dermatol Venereol (Stockh)
`1989;69:434-6.
`14. Stevenson CJ. Treatment in bullous diseases with cortico-
`steroid drugs and corticotrophin. Br J Dermatol1960;72: 11-
`21.
`15. Savin JA. The events leading to the death of patients with
`pemphigus and pemphigoid. Br J Dermatol1979;101:521-
`34.
`16. Milligan A, Hutchinson PE. The use of chlorambucil in the
`treatment of bullous pemphigoid. JAM AcAD DERMATOL
`1990;22:796-80 1.
`
`BOUND VOLUMES AVAILABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS
`Bound volumes of the JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY are available to subscribers (only) for the 1993 issues
`from the Publisher at a cost of$69.00 for domestic, $91.83 for Canadian, and $87.00 for international for volume 28 (January-June) and vol-
`ume 29 (July-December). Shipping charges are included. Each bound volume contains a subject and author index and all advertising is re-
`moved. Copies are shipped within 60 days after publication of the last issue in the volume. The binding is durable buckram with the journal
`name, volume number, and year stamped in gold on the spine. Payment must accompany all orders. Contact Mosby-Year Book, Inc., Sub-
`scription Services, 11830 Westline Industrial Dr., St. Louis, MO 63146-3318. USA: phone (800) 325-4177, ext. 4351; (314) 453-4351.
`Subscriptions must be in force to qualify. Bound volumes are not available in place of a regular journal subscription.
`
`Exh. 1062

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket