throbber
Journal of Dermalologica/ Trtalmenl (1989), 1, 23-25
`
`(b) Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 1989
`
`The successful use of minocycline in pyoderma gangrenosum - a report of
`seven cases and review of the literature
`
`John Berth-Jones MRCP1, Stella Veronica Tan BSc, MB BS1, Robin Alan Charles Graham-Brown
`BSc, MRCP1 & Andrew Charles Pembroke MA, FRCP2
`r Department of Dermatology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LEI 5 WW: 1 Kings College Hospital, London
`
`We report seven cases in which minocycline was success-
`fully used to treat pyoderma gangrenosum. This more than
`doubles the six previously reported cases. MinocycHne is
`considerably safer than systemic steroids and may,
`therefore, represent a useful advance in the treatment of
`this disease.
`
`Introduction
`
`It is often stated that a disease with many remedies has no
`cure. Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) might appear to be a
`prime example of such a disease. The established treat-
`ment consists of high doses of oral steroids - with or
`without 'steroid sparing agents'. 1 Among alternative
`treatments advocated are: topical steroids, clofazimine,Z
`
`intra-lesional triamcinolone,3 cyclosporin A: topical
`
`disodium cromoglycate, s cyclophosphamide, 6 azathiop-
`rine,' sulphasalazine,• dapsone,' plasma exchange10 and
`minocycline. 11 - 13
`Of all these agents minocycline is, in our experience, the
`safest, and appears currently to be the most widely used.
`We were therefore surprised to discover that the entire
`literature on the use ofminocycline in PG consists of three
`reports of successful use of the drug in a total of six
`cases. 11- 13

`This is presumably due to the relative rarity ofPG and
`other inherent difficulties in performing a trial of any new
`treatment. Not least of these are the heterogeneity in the
`severity of PG and in the diseases associated with it.
`We therefore wish to report our experience of the use of
`minocycline in a further seven cases of PG.
`
`cinolone effected complete resolution. Minocycline was
`discontinued in July 1983.
`A further recurrence developed in Novem~?er 1983,
`involving the right scapular region. This responded
`completely within 3 months to minocycline 100 mg bd
`and two intralesional injections of triamcinolone. The
`minocycline was then continued at the dose of 100 mg bd
`until April 1985 when the dose was halved.
`Two additional recurrences ofPG developed following
`attempts to reduce the dose of minocycline, and resolved
`after the dose was restored. Two doses of intralesional
`steroid were injeeted on one occasion, and a single dose
`on the other. The dose of minocycline was then main-
`tained at 1 00 mg tds and he remained free from pyoderma
`for 2 years.
`Two subsequent minor recurrences have responded
`promptly to an increase in the dose of minocycline to
`200 mg daily and intralesional steroid injections.
`
`Case2
`Mr JB presented in July 1981 at the age of 69, with a 5
`month history of weeping ulcers over the back, chest, and
`arms. The clinical appearances were considered diagnos·
`tic of PG, and histology was compatible. Investigations
`revealed no evidence of additional pathology.
`He was treated with minocycline I 00 mg bd and the
`lesions gradually improved. Three months later only two
`remained, although complete healing took 6 months.
`Minocycline was continued in the same dose for a further
`6 months and then stopped. There was no evidence of
`recurrence after a further 9 months of follow-up.
`
`Case reports
`
`Case 1
`Mr AC first developed PG in June 1977, aged 24, as a
`complication of facial acne vulgaris. This remained active
`in spite of treatment with oral prednisolone in high doses
`(55-80 mg alt die) for 18 months, before resolving on
`prednisolone 80 mg every other day. Extensive investiga-
`tion revealed no evidence of any associated disease.
`Lesions of pyoderma recurred in May 1983 involving
`the right temple. Treatment was commenced with in-
`tralesional triamcinolone, but no response was obtained.
`Minocycline I 00 mg bd was then commenced, and after
`one month of this treatment alone the lesion had almost
`healed. Three further injections of intralesional triam-
`
`Correspondence: Dr Berlh-Jones
`
`Case3
`MrsJM presented at theageof58inJanuary 1986withan
`ulcerated lesion over the lateral aspect of the right shin.
`This had been slowly enlarging since its first appearance 2
`months earlier. Her previous medical history was
`unremarkable except for recurrent episodes of posterior
`uveitis.
`Examination revealed a sloughy ulcer measuring 6 em
`in width and 7 em in length with an undetermined
`necrotic margin, the appearance being typical of PG.
`Investigations were all normal except
`for
`the
`rheumatoid factor which was positive in low titre.
`Treatment was commenced with minocycline 100 mg
`twice daily orally and 0.05 per cent fluocinonide cream
`applied daily to the ulcer under an occlusive dressing.
`The lesion began to heal within 1 week and had totally
`resolved within 2 months. Atten Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`minocycline were followed on
`v.
`rences of the ulcer when the do
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1057
`
`

`
`Journal of Dermorological Treatmen1 (l989), 1, 23 - 25
`
`0 Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 1989
`
`The successful use of minocycline in pyoderma gangrenosum - a report of
`seven cases and review of the literature
`
`John Berth-Jones MRCP', Stella Veronica Tan BSc, MB BS', Robin Alan Charles Graham-Brown
`BSc, MRCP' & Andrew Charles Pembroke MA, FRCP2
`'Department ojDermatology. Leicester Royal Injrmary, Leicester LEI 5 WW; 'Kings College Hospital. London
`
`We report seven cases in which minocycline was success-
`fully used to treat pyoderma gangrenosum. This more than
`doubles the six previously reported cases. Minocycline is
`considerably safer than systemic steroids and may,
`therefore, represent a useful advance in the treatment of
`this disease.
`
`Introduction
`
`It is often stated that a disease with many remedies has no
`cure. Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) might appear to be a
`prime example of such a disease. The established treat-
`ment consists of high doses of oral steroids - with or
`without 'steroid sparing agents'.' Among alternative
`treatments advocated are: topical steroids, clofazimine;
`topical
`intra-lesional triamcinolone,' cyclosporin A,'
`disodium cromoglycate,' cyclophosphamide,6 azathiop-
`rine,' sulphasalazine,* dapsone,' plasma exchange" and
`minocycline."-"
`Of all these agents minocycline is, in our experience, the
`safest, and appears currently to be the most widely used.
`We were therefore surprised to discover that the entire
`literature on the use of minocycline in PG consists of three
`reports of successful use of the drug in a total of six
`cases. ' ' -
`This is presumably due to the relative rarity of PG and
`other inherent difficulties in performing a trial of any new
`treatment. Not least of these are the heterogeneity in the
`severity of PG and in the diseases associated with it.
`We therefore wish to report our experience of the use of
`minocycline in a further seven cases of PG.
`
`Case reports
`
`Case 1
`Mr AC first developed PG in June 1977, aged 24, as a
`complication of facial acne vulgaris. This remained active
`in spite of treatment with oral prednisolone in high doses
`(55-80mg alt die) for 18 months, before resolving on
`prednisolone 80 mg every other day. Extensive investiga-
`tion revealed no evidence of any associated disease.
`Lesions of pyoderma recurred in May 1983 involving
`the right temple. Treatment was commenced with in-
`tralesional triamcinolone, but no response was obtained.
`Minocycline 100 mg bd was then commenced, and after
`one month of this treatment alone the lesion had almost
`healed. Three further injections of intralesional triam-
`
`Correspondence: Dr Berth-Jones
`
`~~~~~~~
`
`cinolone effected complete resolution. Minocycline was
`discontinued in July 1983.
`A further recurrence developed in November 1983,
`involving the right scapular region. This responded
`completely within 3 months to minocycline 100mg bd
`and two intralesional injections of triamcinolone. The
`minocycline was then continued at the dose of 100 mg bd
`until April 1985 when the dose was halved.
`Two additional recurrences of PG developed following
`attempts to reduce the dose of minocycline, and resolved
`after the dose was restored. Two doses of intralesional
`steroid were injected on one occasion, and a single dose
`on the other. The dose of minocycline was then main-
`tained at 100 mg tds and he remained free from pyoderma
`for 2 years.
`Two subsequent minor recurrences have responded
`promptly to an increase in the dose of minocycline to
`200 mg daily and intralesional steroid injections.
`
`Case 2
`Mr JB presented in July 1981 at the age of 69, with a 5
`month history of weeping ulcers over the back, chest, and
`arms. The clinical appearances were considered diagnos-
`tic of PG, and histology was compatible. Investigations
`revealed no evidence of additional pathology.
`He was treated with minocycline 100mg bd and the
`lesions gradually improved. Three months later only two
`remained, although complete healing took 6 months.
`Minocycline was continued in the same dose for a further
`6 months and then stopped. There was no evidence of
`recurrence after a further 9 months of follow-up.
`
`Case 3
`Mrs JM presented at the age of 58 in January 1986 with an
`ulcerated lesion over the lateral aspect of the right shin.
`This had been slowly enlarging since its first appearance 2
`months earlier. Her previous medical history was
`unremarkable except for recurrent episodes of posterior
`uveitis.
`Examination revealed a sloughy ulcer measuring 6 cm
`in width and 7m in length with an undetermined
`necrotic margin, the appearance being typical of PG.
`Investigations were all normal except
`for
`the
`rheumatoid factor which was positive in low titre.
`Treatment was commenced with minocycline 100 mg
`twice daily orally and 0.05 per cent fluocinonide cream
`applied daily to the ulcer under an occlusive dressing.
`The lesion began to heal within 1 week and had totally
`resolved within 2 months. Attempts to reduce the dose of
`minocycline were followed on two occasions by recur-
`rences of the ulcer when the dose was reduced to below
`
`J Dermatolog Treat Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by National Library of Medicine on 05/28/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`Exh. 1057
`
`

`
`24
`
`JOHN BERTH-JONES er al
`
`50 mg daily. She therefore remains on this dose at present
`as maintenance therapy. She requires no topical steroids.
`
`Case 4
`Mrs MC presented in January 1987 at the age of 63 with a
`3 month history of a persistent ulcer on the abdomen and
`a similar lesion which had developed on the right shin 3
`days earlier. The appearances were typical of PG. Inves-
`tigations revealed mild ulcerative colitis for which no
`treatment was initially required. Treatment was com-
`menced with minocycline 100mg bd and definite im-
`provement was noted in both lesions 2 weeks later.
`Triamcinolone was then injected into the lesions. Com-
`plete healing of the pyoderma had occurred by April. The
`dose of minocycline was maintained until June, then
`gradually tailed off.
`In December 1987 the dose of minocycline was cut to
`50 mg daily. After 1 month on this dose and during an
`episode of more active colitis, a recurrence of pyoderma
`developed on the abdomen. The dose of minocycline was
`doubled, and treatment with sulphasalazine 4 gm daily
`was commenced for her colitis. The abdominal lesion
`healed completely in approximately 6 weeks. Treatment
`was maintained with minocycline 100mg daily and
`sulphasalazine 3 gm daily, and no further recurrence
`developed.
`
`Case 5
`Mr PR presented with PG in September 1987 at the age of
`56. Typical PG lesions had developed on the left temple
`and perineum over the previous 2 months. Investigations
`revealed no evidence of any associated illness. Treatment
`was commenced with minocycline 100 mg bd and within 1
`week a marked improvement had been noted.
`The lesions subsequently continued to heal, but rather
`slowly, and the dose of minocycline was therefore in-
`creased to 100 mg tds 1 month later. During December
`1987 the perineal lesion resolved. The lesion over the
`temple improved but did not completely heal, and a single
`intralesional injection of triamcinolone was performed in
`February 1988. Three weeks later this lesion had also
`healed, leaving a fragile scar over the temple, which broke
`down occasionally when traumatized. The dose of
`minocycline was gradually reduced, and the drug was
`finally stopped in October 1988.
`
`Case 6
`Mr JB first developed PG in November 1987, aged 62, in
`association with an IgA monoclonal band, which has so
`far behaved in a benign manner. The initial episode
`responded to systemic steroids, but the disease recurred at
`the same site on the left leg 8 months later. On this
`occasion the patient was treated with minocycline 200 mg
`bd. One week after commencing treatment the lesion had
`noticeably reduced in size. It subsequently resolved
`completely over the following 4 weeks, and the dose was
`reduced to 100 mg daily. The patient has remained in
`remission to date.
`
`Case 7
`Mr DG had suffered from rheumatoid disease for 26
`years. He presented in December 1988 at the age of 60,
`with a 1 month history of multiple ulcers over the trunk.
`
`The appearances were typical of PG. The largest lesion, in
`the right inguinal region, measured 18 cm in length by
`8 cm in width at presentation.
`Treatment commenced in hospital with minocycline
`200 mg bd. Healing was clearly evident within 4 days of
`starting treatment, and progressed rapidly, so that at the
`time of discharge, 3 weeks later, all of the ulcers on his
`trunk had healed and the lesion in the right groin had
`reduced in size to 8 cm x 4 cm. On review in outpatients 1
`month later healing had progressed further.
`
`Discussion
`
`The term pyoderma gangrenosum was first used by
`Brunsting, Goeckerman and O’Leary in 1930.14 Under
`this title these authors reported a series of five patients
`suffering from cutaneous ulcers of an unusual and
`distinctive appearance. These were surrounded by a blue
`zone, consisting of an oedematous boggy strip from 5 to
`8 mm wide, in which there developed extensive undermin-
`ing and necrosis of the subcutaneous tissue. Four of these
`patients suffered from ulcerative colitis. In early reports
`the disease was considered to be caused by a variety of
`infections with bacteria or amoebae.” Treatment was
`therefore directed towards eradication of these organisms
`using a variety of measures including antiseptics, vac-
`cines, X-rays, carbon dioxide snow, cautery,14 hyperim-
`mune steptococcic serum,I6 and, when they became
`
`available, ~ulphonamides.’~~l~*‘ However, further inves-
`tigation failed to implicate any consistent association
`with a specific organism,I9 and it was noted that if early
`pustular lesions were sampled, cultures always proved to
`be sterile.’-U
`More significantly, associations were increasingly
`recognized with a number of diseases considered to be
`linked with
`immune dysfunction. These
`included
`rheumatoid
`disease,
`chronic
`active
`hepatitis,
`inflammatory bowel disease, leukaemias, and dys-
`proteinaemias.’ Paradoxically, therefore, the treatment
`approach in general use changed from methods directed
`towards eradicating infection, to the use of systemic
`steroids and immunosuppressants. These proved highly
`effective. I
`The use of systemic steroids and immunosuppressants
`is, of course, associated with significant morbidity and
`mortality,a and the ensuing years have seen a search for
`effective safer alternatives. There has been a return to the
`use of antibiotics and, in particular, minocycline.
`The mechanism of action of these agents in PG remains
`obscure, but it has been suggested that it may be related to
`alterations in neutrophil polyrnorph function. Infiltration
`by neutrophils is a consistent histological feature of PG:‘
`and tetracyclines inhibit the chemotactic responsiveness
`of neutrophils.2J
`Side-effects of minocycline are rarely serious. They
`the face or extremities,
`include pigmentation of
`(especially at high dose),26 exanthematous, urticaria],
`bullous and fixed drug eruptions.” Photosensitive erup-
`tions also occur.” Nausea, vertigo and infections with
`candida albicans may occur.” All tetracyclines are con-
`traindicated in children under the age of 12 as they cause
`staining of the teeth. More seriously, episodes of
`headache and visual disturbance associated with raised
`intracranial pressure have been rep~rted.”.’~ This can also
`occur with tetracycline but appears to be a rare
`
`J Dermatolog Treat Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by National Library of Medicine on 05/28/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`Exh. 1057
`
`

`
`phenomenon.*' This effect is not dose-related, and is
`reversible on stopping treatment.
`The use of minocycline in PG was first reported by
`Lynch and Bergfeld in 1978," following an initial chance
`observation. They 'reported four cases which responded
`to a dose of 300 mg daily. These were associated in one
`case each with rheumatoid disease, dysproteinaemia and
`ulcerative colitis. Davies and Piper'* described a further
`case, associated with rheumatoid disease, which res-
`ponded to a dose of 100 mg tds. In the French literature a
`single case showing a favourable response was reported
`by Bernard et af."
`In all our cases there was improvement of the PG
`following treatment with minocycline. Several cases also
`showed a marked tendency to relapse when the minocyc-
`line was reduced in dose or stopped. It therefore appears
`highly likely that minocycline is of real value in this
`
`References
`
`MINOCYCLINE IN PYODERMA GANGRENOSUM
`
`25
`
`condition. Furthermore, both in previous reports and in
`our cases, response to minocycline appears to occur
`regardless of disease severity or the coexistence of other
`associated conditions such as paraproteinaemias,
`rheumatoid disease, or ulcerative colitis.
`Our cases bring to a total of 13 the number of cases of
`PG reported to have been treated successfully with
`minocycline. Although the results of the use of minocyc-
`line sound very promising, further studies of the use of
`this treatment are required before it can really be
`established as a first-line modality.
`PG is a difficult disease to investigate and a double-
`blind trial of minocycline against either placebo or
`prednisolone is probably impossible. It might, however,
`be possible to perform an open study of a large group of
`patients on a multi-centre basis.
`
`1. Holt PJA, The current status of pyoderma gangrenosum.
`CIin Exp Dermatol(1979) 4 509- 16.
`2. Lovett GW, Field JP, King LE, Treatment of pyoderma
`gangrenosum with clofazimine. J Tenn Med Assoc (1 98 1 ) 74:
`567-8.
`3. Goldstein F, Krain R, Thornton JJ, Intra-lesional steroid
`therapy of pyoderma gangrenosum. J Clin Gusfroenferol
`(1985) 7: 499-501.
`4. Curley, RK, Macfarlane AW, Vickers CF, Pyoderma
`gangrenosum treated with cyclosporin A. Br J Dermafol
`(1985) 113: 601-4.
`5. Saffouri B, Hom BM, Mertesdorf JM el al, Treatment of
`pyoderma gangrenosum with disodium cromoglycate. Dig
`Dis Sci (1984) 2 9 183-5.
`6. Newell LM, Malkinson FD, Pyoderma gangrenosum.
`Response to cyclophosphamide therapy. Arch Dermafol
`(1983) 119 495-7.
`7. Shopf E, Schulz HJ, Schulz KH, Azathioprine-Behandlung
`der dermatitis ulcerosa (pyoderma gangrenosum). Haufarzf
`(1969) 20: 558-63.
`8. Perry HO, Brunsting LA, Pyoderma gangrenosum. A
`clinical study of nineteen cases. Arch Dermafol (1957) 75:
`380-6.
`9. Lorincz AL, Pearson RW, Sulphapyridine and sulphone
`type drugs in dermatology. Arch Dermafol(1962) 85: 2 - 16.
`10. Clayton R, Feiwel M, Valdimarsson H, Pyoderma gang-
`renosum with cellular immunity deficit treated with plas-
`mapheresis and leucocyte transfusions. Br J Dermatol
`(1976) 95 (SUPPI 14): 67-8.
`1 1. Lynch WS, Bergfeld WF, Pyoderma gangrenosum respon-
`sive to minocycline hydrochloride. Cuiis (1978) 21: 535-8.
`12. Davies MG, and Piper S, Pyoderma gangrenosum: success-
`ful treatment with minocycline. Clin Exp Dermafol(l98 1) 6:
`2 19-23.
`13. Bernard P, Amici JM, Catanzano G et al, Pyoderma
`gangrenosum and vasculitis. Pathogenic discussion apropos
`of three cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol(1987) 114 1229-34.
`14. Brunsting LA, Goeckerman WH, O'Leary PH, Pyodenna
`(echthyma) gangrenosum. Clinical and experimental obser-
`vations in five cases occurring in adults. Arch Dermal and
`Syph (1930) 22: 655-80.
`15. Greenbaum SS, Phagedaena geometrica (Brocq). Arch
`
`Dermal and Syph (1941) 43: 775-801.
`16. Schmidt HW, Hyperimmune streptococcic serum in the
`treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum associated with
`ulcerative colitis and carcinoma of the colon. Proc Sluff
`Meet Muyo Clinic (1936) 11: 244-7.
`17. Weiner AL. Pyoderma gangrenosum treated with sul-
`phanilamide: case. Arch Dermal and Syph (1940) 41:
`711-17.
`18. Dostrovsky A. Sagher F. Phagedenic ulcer (pyoderma
`gangrenosum). Treatment with sulphapyridine powder and
`moist chamber therapy. Arch Dermal and Syph (1943) 48:
`164-72.
`19. Russell B. Phagedenic and gangrenous ulceration of the
`skin complicating ulcerative colitis. (Phagedaena geomet-
`ricum). Br J Dermaiol(1950) 62: I 14-23.
`20. Van der Sluis 1. Two cases of pyoderma (echthyma)
`gangrenosum associated with an abnormal serum protein
`(B2A paraprorein) - with a review of the literature. Der-
`mafologica ( 1966) 132: 409- 24.
`21. Dantzig PI, Pyoderma gangrenosum. New Engl J Med
`(1975) 292: 47-8.
`22. Stolman LP, Rosenthal D, Yaworskly R el ul. Pyoderma
`gangrenosum and rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Dermufol
`(1975) 3: 1020-3.
`23. Holt PJA, Davies MG, Saunders KC et al, Pyoderma
`gangrenosum - clinical and investigative findings in 15
`patients with special reference to polyarthritis. Medicine
`(1980) 59: 114-33.
`24. Percival GH, Pyoderma gangrenosum: the histology of the
`primary lesion. Br J Dermuiol(1957) 69: 130-6.
`25. Martin RR. Warr G. Yeager H et d. The effects of
`tetracycline on leukotaxis. JInfecf Dis (1974) 129 110-16.
`26. Basler RSW, Minocycline-related hyperpigmentation. Arch
`Dermofol(1985) 121: 606-8.
`27. Nater JP, de Groot AC, Liem DH, Unwanted effects of
`cosmetics and drugs. Elsevier: Oxford, 1985. p. 252-3.
`28. Walters BNJ, Gubbay SS, Tetracycline and benign intrac-
`ranial hypertension. Report of five cases. Br Med J (198 1)
`282: 19.
`29. Lubetzki C, Sansom M, Cohen D et al. Hypertension
`intracrinienne Enigne et minocycline. Rev Neurol (Paris)
`(1988) 144: 218-20.
`
`'
`
`J Dermatolog Treat Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by National Library of Medicine on 05/28/15
`
`For personal use only.
`
`Exh. 1057
`
`

`
`Volume 1
`
`Number 1
`
`June 1989
`
`The
`Journal of
`Dermatological
`Treatment
`
`' {
`
`L 25 '..,9
`. ,·
`
`.
`
`A
`
`010
`
`J !
`
`h
`#
`
`-
`
`Martin Dunitz and
`Macmillan Press
`
`Exh. 1057
`
`

`
`-
`
`The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is
`published by Martin Dunitz Limited and The
`Macmillan Press Ltd,
`Houndmills, Basingstoke,
`Hampshire RG21 2XS, UK.
`Telephone: Basingstoke (0256) 29242
`Fax: (0256) 479476
`
`The Journal of Dermatological Treatment will
`publish articles dealing with all aspects ofthe
`treatment of skin disorders. Articles will be
`included on both the topical and systemic
`treatment of skin disease as well as on
`phototherapy, the surgical approach and other
`types of treatment and the overall management of
`patients with skin disorders.
`© The Journal ofDermatological Treatment
`ISSN 0954-6634
`
`Manuscripts and all editorial correspondence
`should be sent to:
`Professor Ronald Marks
`The Journal of Dermatological Treatment
`Department of Medicine
`University ofWales Coll~ge ofMedicine,
`Heath Park,
`Cardiff.
`• CF44XN, UK
`
`~---
`
`The Editorsreserve the right to make changes . .
`which may clarify or conden~e papers where thts ~~
`considered desirable. All busmess correspondence,
`reprint requests and enquiries concernmg
`advertising space and rates should be addressed to
`the Scientific & Medical Division, The Macmillan
`Press Ltd, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire
`RG21 2XS, UK.
`Subscription price per volume of six iss~es: EE~
`±:90.00, rest of the world ±: 100.00 or eqmvalent tn
`any other currency. Orders must be accompanied
`by remittance. Cheques should be made payable to
`Macmillan Press and sent to: The Macmillan Pres~
`Ltd, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire
`RG21 2XS, UK.
`All rights of reproduction are reserved in respect of
`all papers, articles, illustrations, etc., published in
`this journal in all countries of the world.
`Authorization to photocopy items for internal or
`personal use, or the internal or personal_use of
`specific clients, is granted by The M~cmtllan ~ress
`Ltd, for libraries and other users regtstered wtth
`the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC)
`Transactional Reporting Service, provided that the
`base fee of $01.00 per copy, plus $0.10 per page is
`paid directly to CCC, 21 Congress St, Salem,
`MA 01970, USA.
`0954-6634/89 $1.00 + 0.10
`
`I
`
`PRES·
`UNGUt:
`·'~'.\l<:lll \
`Propcni
`(olntmc 1
`rompon
`akohol,
`~J I Ur'Jit:(
`U.csr ur
`
`.
`.
`. .
`. .
`.
`.
`. .
`~:~~\every etfon is made by thc publishers and editorial board to sec that no inaccurat ·
`'· clear that thc d,na and optm ons appearing in the article . . d . d
`.
`"or mtsleadmg data. opmton or Statement appears '" tlliS Journa l they wish JO
`r



`ccordmgly thc p bl' ·h
`h
`.
`.
`s .tn
`'' verusements herem arc th
`•
`·b·l·
`.

`u
`ts crs, t e cdJtonal committec ·md thct'r resp .
`e rt:sponst t tty o
`the contnbutor or advertiser conccrncd
`-
`A
`1
`1
`· 1 d'
`maccuratc
`ec 1vc emp oyees officcrs · d.

`· ·
`'

`. d .
`or mJs ea mg data, opinion or Statement. Whilst every e"'"o t ·.
`. d
`,
`an agents accept no habthty whatsocver for the conscquences o fan y such
`a vtsed that new m th d.. d
`' r '' ma e to ensure tha t drug d ·• · . d
`h
`.
`.
`· ·
`11
`techmques mvolvingdrug usage. and desc 'b d
`. h'
`h' .
`oses an ot er quanillieS are presented accuratcly, readcrs are
`.
`. e o s an
`n e wn 111 1 " Journal. should only bc followcd in conjunction with the drug manufacturer's
`own pubhshed hterature.
`
`Typeset by Elite Typesetting Tcchniques, Southampton, Hampshire.
`Pnntedl'lli•<!JteU'Btlt'tY!Il>~j>jlltlld Friary Press, Darchester
`atthe NLM and m ay l>e
`Stftlj ect US Copyright Laws
`
`Exh. 1057

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket