throbber
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`Volume 878
`
`INHIBITION OF MATRIX
`METALLOPROTEINASES
`THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS
`
`Edited by Robert A. Greenwald, Stanley Zucker,
`and Lorne M. Golub
`
`I
`
`The New York Academy of Sciences
`New York, New York
`1999
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-_
`Exhibit 1029
`Exh. 1029
`
`

`
`Copyright© 1999 by the New York Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Under the provi-
`sions of the United States Copyright Act of 1976, individual readers of the Annals are permitted to
`makefair use ofthe material in themjor teaching and research. Permission is granted to quotejrom
`the Annals provided that the customary acknowledgment is made of the source. Material in the
`Annals may be republished only by pennission of the Academy. Address inquiries to the Executive
`Editor at the New York Academy of Sciences.
`Copying fees: Foreach copy of an article made beyond the jree copying pennitted under Section
`107 or 108 ojthe 1976 Copyright Act, afee should be paid through the Copyright Clearance Center,
`Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. The fee for copying an article is $3.00 for nonaca-
`demic use; for use in the classroom it is $0.07 per page.
`8 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National
`Standard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANS!
`Z39.48-1984.
`
`The cover of the paper-bound edition of this volume shows the catalytic domain of a crystal struc-
`ture of truncated MMP-3 bound to an MMP inhibitor. The inhibitor shown is PGE-116611, the
`chemical name of which is: (2R)-isobutyl-(3S)-[N-hydroxycarboxamido]-6-hydroxyhexanoic
`acid amide of (1N)-2-[methoxyethyl]-caprolactam-(3S)-amine. The cover illustration was gener-
`ously provided by Drs. Biswanath De and Gien Mieling of Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals.
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publicaiion Data
`Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases : therapeutic applications
`I edited by Robert A. Greenwald, Stanley Zucker, and Lorne M. Golub.
`(Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
`p. cm. -
`0077-8923 ; V. 878)
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 1-57331-180-4 (cloth: alk. paper)
`ISBN 1-57331-181-2 (pbk: alk. paper)
`1. Metalloproteinases-Inhibitors-Therapeutic use Congresses. 2.
`Extracellular matrix proteins Congresses.
`I. Greenwald, Robert A.,
`II. Zucker, Stanley. m. Golub, Lorne M.
`1943-
`IV. Series.
`Qll .N5 vol. 878 RM666.M512
`500 s--dc21
`[615' .35]
`
`99-30122
`CIP
`
`K-M Research/PCP
`Printed in the United States of America
`ISBN 1-57331-180-4 (cloth)
`ISBN 1-57331-181-2 (paper)
`ISSN 0077-8923
`.
`
`Exh. 1029
`
`

`
`Non-antimicrobial and Antimicrobial
`Tetracyclines Inhibit IL-6 Expression
`in Murine Osteobiasts
`
`KEITH L. KIRKWOOD,0•bJLORNE M. GOLUB,c AND PETER G. BRADFORDb,d,e
`
`0Department of Periodontics and hcenter for Molecular Mechanisms of Diseases
`and Aging, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA
`
`cDepartment of Oral Biolo gy and Pathology, State University of New York at Stony Brook,
`Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
`
`dDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology and eDepartment of Oral Biology,
`State University ofNew York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA
`
`IL-6 regulation in osteoblasts has bee~ the focus of several groups, since this cytok-
`ine appears to contribute toward the pathophysiological state of postmenopausal os-
`teopenia.1 IL-6 is the major cytokine regulated by sex steroids as compared to other
`cytokines, such as IL-1ß, IL-11, and TNF-a., that arenot regulated by sex steroids.2
`Previous results from our laboratory have indicated that intracellular calcium is a
`critical determinant of the osteoblast secretory capacity. 3.4 Since tetracycline is well
`known for its ability to bind divalent cations, such as calcium and zinc, and to affect
`intracellular calcium concentrations,5 we evaluated the abilities of doxycycline and
`chemically modified tetracyclines, which lack antimicrobial activity, to affect osteo-
`b last IL-6 secretion from MC3T3-EI osteoblastic cells:
`
`METHODS
`
`IL-6 Secretion Measurements
`
`MC3T3-El cell~ were cultured in 6-well tissue culture dishes under standard tis-
`sue culture conditions. Test cells were pretreated for 18-24 hr with doxycycline,
`CMTs (1-50 ~g), or vehicle (DMSO 10 ~g/ml). IL-1ß was added to culture media
`at physiological relevant concentrations (10-20 pM), and the cells continued to in-
`cubate for an additional18 hr. Time course experiments as well as dose response ex-
`periments with CMTs were conducted in the same manner. Mouse IL-6 secretion
`was measured by a capture ELISA kit (Quantikine, R&D Systems) following the
`manufacturer's protocol. Quantities of IL-6 were expressed in pg/ml of cultured su-
`pernatant.
`
`f Address for correspondence: Keith L. Kirk:wood, D.D.S. Ph.D., State University of New
`York at Buffalo, Department of Periodontics, 215 Squire Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, New
`York 14214-3000. Phone, 716/829-3845; fax, 716/837-7623; e-mail, klkirk@acsu.buffalo.edu
`
`667
`
`Exh. 1029
`
`

`
`668
`
`ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`
`Northern Blot.Analysis of Osteoblast Gene Expression
`For detection of mRNA from control and CMT-treated MC3T3-EI osteoblastic
`cells, we employed Northem blot using methods as described previously.3 Rat IL-6
`cDNA clone was obtained as a gift from Dr. J. Goldie, McMaster University, Hamil-
`ton, Ontario. Dr. R. Franceschi, University of Michigan, kindly provided the mouse
`type l(al) procollagen cDNA probe. After hybridization with the appropriate
`probes, membranes were washed at high stringency, and the hybridized probe was
`quantitated using Bio-Rad's phosphoimager system and Molecular Analyst software
`version 1.5.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Chemically Modified Tetracyclines Inhibit IL-6 Secretion in MC3T3-El Cells
`To determine if IL-6 secretion can be regulated by doxycycline or the other
`CMTs, IL-6 secretion from MC3T3-El c:ells was measured using a capture ELISA
`kit specific for mouse IL-6. Results shown in FIGURE IA indicate that CMT-8
`(10 jlg/ml) can inhibit IL-6 secretion from MC3T3-EI cells when stimulated by
`IL-lß (10 ng/ml). CMT-8 decreased IL-6 secretion by -49% compared to cells pre-
`
`1200
`
`1000
`
`800
`
`llr6
`(pg/011) 600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`0
`
`I
`
`-~ i
`~i
`i •• '*"
`';r,
`
`rf.t
`~
`-~
`\Ii
`'T ~
`
`• no agon1st
`Dll.rl
`
`BDOX 10
`lll Dox tonL-1
`BCMT-5 10
`
`•CMT-5/IL-1
`•cMT-8 10
`DCMT-8/IL-1
`
`400
`200
`o~~--~--P-~--~~~-
`0
`0.3
`1.0
`3.3
`10.0 33.3
`CMT-8
`(Jlglml)
`
`FIGURE 1. (Left) The effects of chemically modified tetracyclines on IL-lß-
`induced IL-6 secretion in osteoblasts. MC3T3-E1 cells were pretreated for 18 hours with
`doxycycline or CMTs at 10 J.Lg/rnl. Fresh mediawas added with the pretreatment condi-
`tions ± IL-1ß (12.5 ng/ml). Cells continued to incubate for an additiona118 hours, and
`cells supernatants were harvested. IL-6 secretion was measured using an IL-6 Quantikine
`Kit (R&D Systems). Quantitation of IL-6 was made using linear regression with a standard
`curve. Bach measurement was made in duplicate, and the mean of two different experi-
`ments was used for analysis with Standard deviations. The results are considered statisti-
`cally significant (p = 0.005). (Right) CMT-8 dose-response in IL-1ß treated MC3T3-El
`osteoblasts. MC3T3-E 1 cells were pretreated with CMT -8 at the following concentrations:
`0, 0.3, 1.0, 3.3, 10.0, and 30.0 J.Lg/ml. Cells were subsequently treated with IL-1ß (12.5 ng/
`ml) after a change in media and addition of pretreatment conditions. IL-6 measurements
`were made as described. Means of two separate experiments performed in duplicates ±
`standard deviations of the mean. The ICso was calculated to be 4.4 J.Lg/rnl.
`
`Exh. 1029
`
`

`
`KIRKWOOD et al.: CMT-8 INHIBITS IL-6 EXPRESSION
`
`669
`
`treated with vehicle. CMT-5 decreased IL-6 secretion by -13%. Doxycycline de-
`creased IL-1ß-induced.IL-6 secretion by -33%. The results shown are the means of
`two separate experiments performed in duplicate. Standard deviations are shown;
`these results are considered statistically significant (p = 0.005). Inhibition of IL-1 ß-
`stimulated IL-6 secretion occurred in a dose-dependent manner with pharmacologi-
`cally relevant concentrations of this drug (1-10 ~g/ml) reducing IL-6 by about 50%
`as shown in FIGURE 1A. Pretreatment with CMT-8 was reduced to 8 hours in these
`experiments. FIGURE 1B illustrates the dose-response effect with decreasing
`amounts of IL-6 secretion when increasing the amount. of CMT-8. The IC50 for.
`CMT-8 inhibition of IL-1 ß-induced IL-6 secretion was experimentally determined
`to be 4.4 ~g/ml.
`
`CMT-8 Decreases Steady State IL-6 mRNA Levels in MC3T3-El Cells
`Northern blot analysiswas used to determine IL-6 mRNA expression in IL-1ß-
`treated cells with or without pretreatment with doxycycline or CMTs. IL-6 mRNA
`species of 1.2-2.4 kb were detected in MC3T3-EI cells (FIGURE 2). As shown previ-
`ously in these cells, IL-1ß increases steady state mRNA levels. When cells are pre-
`treated with doxycycline. or CMTs or treated after IL-1ß Stimulation (data not
`shown), CMT-8 decreases the IL-6 mRNA steady state levels in these cells. In con-
`trast, neither doxycline nor CMT-5 were able to decrease IL-6 mRNA steady state
`levels (FIG. 2). When levels of GAPDH were used to normalize the data, an approx-
`imate 50% reduction in IL-6 mRNA with CMT-8 treatment is seen compared to
`
`No tx
`
`IL-lß CMT-8 CMT-8 Dox
`
`CMT·S
`
`IL-6
`
`Type 1 (al)
`Procollagen
`
`GAPDH
`
`FIGURE 2. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured in the presence or absence of CMTs of
`doxycycline and then exposed to IL-1 ß (12.5 ng/rnl) for 18 hours. Total RNA was purified,
`separated on agarase gels, blotted onto nylon membranes, and suquentially hybridized
`with [32-P]-labeled cDNA prob es specific for rat IL-6, mause type 1 ( a1) procollagen, and
`ratGAPDH
`
`Exh. 1029
`
`

`
`ANNALS NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
`670
`IL-1ß treated cells (n = 2). Additionally, CMT-8 had no effect on constitutive type I
`procollagen a1(I) gene expression in MC3T3-E1 cells. IL- 1ß decreased type 1 pro-
`collagen a1(I) gene expression by 54% in these cells. This effect was somewhat in-
`hibited by CMT-8 (34%) and to a greater extent by doxycycline (76%).
`· The results of the present study suggest an additional mechariism of CMTs, inhi-
`bition of IL-6 gene expression, and secretion from osteoblasts. Our data indicate that
`IL-1ß-stimulated expression and secretion ofiL-6 in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts can be
`inhibited by CMT-8 in a dose-dependent manner, and the effect of CMT-8 is consis-
`tent with decrease of IL-6 gene expression. These results support the role for chem-
`ically modified tetracyclines to provide anabolic effects in hone: In this paper,
`CMT-8 and, to a lesser extent, doxycycline inhibited the potentially catabolic effects
`of IL-1 ß, suggesting a novel molecular mechanism of these drugs with the treatment
`of metabolic hone diseases, such as osteoporosis.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. HOROWITZ, M.C. 1993. Cytokines and estrogen in hone: antiosteoporotic effects. Sci-
`ence 260: 626-627.
`2. MANOLAGUS, S.C. 1995. Role of cytokines in hone resorption. Bone 17: 63S-67S.
`3. K.lRKWOOD, K., R. DZIAK & P. BRADFORD. 1996. lnositol trisphosphate receptor gene
`expression and hormonal regulation in osteoblast-like celllines and primary osteo-
`blastic cell cultures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 11: 1877.
`4. KIRKWOOD, K., M. DRAGON, K. HoMICK & P. BRADFORD. 1997. Cloning and charac-
`terization of the type I inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor gene promoter: regula-
`tion by 17 ~-estradiol in osteoblast. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 22425-22431.
`5. DONAHUE, H.J., K. liJIMA, M.S. GOLIGORSKY, C.T. RUBIN & B.R. RIFKIN. 1992. Reg-
`ulation of cytoplasmic calcium concentration in tetracycline-treated osteoclasts. J.
`Bone Miner. Res. 7: 1313.
`6. LITTLEWOOD, A.J., J. RUSSELL, G.R. HARVEY, D.E. HUGHES, R.G.G. RUSSELL &
`M. GoWEN. 1991. The modulation of the expression of IL-6 and its receptor in
`human osteoblasts. Endocrinology 129: 1513-1520.
`
`Exh. 1029

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket