throbber
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd. , et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1065
`
`

`
`Index ksue

`V
`VOLUME 28 NUMBER 6
`
`yune I993
`
`’
`
`A Androgen biology as a basis for the diagnosis and
`
` CME article
`treatment of androgenic .
`disorders in women. II._
`
`LTC LEONARD C. SPERLING, MC, USA, and CPT(P) WILLIA
`
`M L. HEIMER II, MC, USA Washington, D.C.
`
`CMEiex‘amination for volume 274
`
`PUBLISHED BY Mosnv
`ST. L0-UIS,4MISS0URl 53:45
`
`ISSN 0190-9622
`
`Exh. 1065
`
`Exh. 1065
`
`

`
`JOURN/\L Of the
`AmeRICaN ACaDemY OF
`DerMaTOLOGY
`
`Copyright © 1993 by the A merican Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
`
`Editor
`Richard L. Dobson, MD
`Associate Editor
`Bruce H . Thiers, MD
`Editorial Office
`~epartment of Dermatology
`edtcal University of South Carolina
`17
`I Ashley Ave
`Ch
`.
`arleston, SC 29425-2215
`803-792-9! 55
`A .
`Phsf•stant Editors
`1 tp C. Anderson, MD
`Columb·
`W
`Ia, M issouri
`alter H. C. Burgdorf MD
`Alb
`'
`PhT uquerque, New M exico
`11P M. Catalano, MD
`Bradenton, Florida
`P. Haines Ely, MD
`Grass v. 11
`p
`a ey, California
`earl E. Grimes, MD
`W Culver City, California
`NC!ark Lambert, MD
`Alf ewark, New Jersey
`red T. Lane, MD
`W Sta'!ford, California
`. ~Itchell Sams, Jr., MD
`D Bz.rmingham, A labama
`amel N. Sauder, MD
`Ham·/
`M: . 1 ton, Ontario
`ana L. Chanco Turner MD
`R Washington, D.C.
`'
`onald G. Wheeland, MD
`S acrame t C /'
`.
`n o, a iforma
`founding Editor
`· Graham Smith, Jr., MD
`Mobile, A labama
`
`VoL 28 N
`Am
`. '
`0 · 6, June 1993, the Journal of the
`encan Acad
`962
`).
`emy of Dermatology (ISSN 01 90-
`2
`volum IS published monthly (six issues per volume, two
`Dr., S~ ~:r year) by Mosby, 11 830 Westline Industrial
`paid at.S UJS, MO 63 146-3318. Second class postage
`fices p
`t. Louis, Missouri, and additional mailing of-
`theA ostmaster: Send address changes to Journal of
`mencanAc d
`f
`\Vesu·
`a emyo Dermatology, Mosby, 11 830
`Ann mle Industrial Dr., St. Louis, MO 63 146-33 18.
`ua subsc · ·
`. npllo~ rates: $103.00 for individuals,
`.
`$17
`f
`2
`00
`right ® or InStitutions. Printed in the U.S.A. Copy-
`1993 by the American Academy of Derm-
`atolo
`60 IG~:.~o:~c., P.O. Box 4014, Schaumburg, IL
`
`June 1993
`
`CONTENTS
`
`June 1993
`
`CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
`
`Androgen biology as a basis for the diagnosis
`and treatment of androgenic disorders in
`women. II.
`LTC Leonard C. Sperling, MC, USA, and
`CPT(P) William L. Heimer II, MC, USA
`Washington, D.C.
`
`Answers to CME examination (Identification
`No. 893-105), May 1993 issue of the JouRNAL
`OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
`
`CME examination
`
`CLINICAL AND LABORATORY STUDIES
`
`Nodular lesions of erythema elevatum diutinum
`in patients infected with the human
`immunodeficiency virus
`Philip E. LeBoit, MD, and
`Clay J. Cockerell, MD
`San Francisco, California,
`and Dallas, Texas
`
`Amplified surface microscopy
`Douglas Puppin, Jr., MD,
`Denis Salomon, MD, and
`Jean-Hilaire Saurat, MD
`Geneva, Switzerland
`
`Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis: A
`clinicopathologic classification
`Omar P. Sangueza, MD, Julio M . Sangueza,
`MD, Mathew J. Stiller, MD, and Pastor
`Sangueza, MD New York, New York, and
`La Paz, Bolivia
`
`901
`
`916
`
`917
`
`919
`
`923
`
`927
`
`Continued on page 7 A
`SA
`
`Exh. 1065
`
`

`
`Brief communications
`
`Treatment of pemphigus and linear lgA dermatosis with nicotinamide and
`tetracycline: A review of 13 cases
`
`MarshaL. Chaffins, MD,a Daniel Collison, MD,b and David P. Fivenson, MDa
`Detroit, Michigan, and Hanover, New Hampshire
`Pemphigus usually requires long-term therapy
`with oral corticosteroids, which can cause significant
`morbidity. 1' 2 Several immunomodulating drugs,
`such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and gold
`have proved beneficial as steroid-sparing agents. 3, 4
`However, these agents also have limited long-term
`utility because of their potential to induce renal and
`hepatic dysfunction and bone marrow suppression.
`Nicotinamide in combination with tetracycline
`has been reported to be effective for bullous pem-
`phigoid (BP) and linear lgA bullous dermatosis
`(LABD ). s, 6 This regimen has the advantage of
`lower toxicity compared with corticosteroids and
`immunosuppressant regimens. We have treated 11
`cases of pemphigus and two cases of LABD with
`nicotinamide and tetracycline and report our expe-
`rience.
`
`A complete blood cell count as well as levels of
`serum electrolytes, glucose, serum glutamic oxalo-
`acetic transferase, serum glutamic pyruvate trans-
`ferase, )'-glutamyl transferase, and bilirubin were
`determined on all patients before beginning therapy,
`after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment, and periodically
`thereafter. In four patients pemphigus autoanti-
`bodies were determined by indirect immunofluores-
`cence on monkey esophagus at the time of diagnosis
`and after at least 8 weeks of treatment.
`RESULTS
`The therapeutic responses of the patients are
`summarized in Table I. When evaluated as a group,
`7 of 13 patients experienced CR. Four patients had
`PR, and two patients failed to respond. Of the six
`patients with PV, three had CR, two had PR, and
`one had NR. Only two patients with PV were able
`to be treated with nicotinamide and tetracycline
`alone; the four other patients required a mean daily
`dose of 8 mg of prednisone to control disease activ-
`ity. Patient 3 was also treated with 150 mg of aza-
`thioprine per day. The follow-up period for these
`patients ranged from 6 to 13 months (mean 9
`months).
`Of the five patients with superficial pemphigus,
`two had CR, two had PR, and one patient did not
`respond. Only one patient (patient 1 0) required a
`mean daily dose of 7.5 mg of prednisone for 10
`months. For the last 5 months his disease has been
`controlled with tetracycline and nicotinamide alone.
`The follow-up period for these patients ranges from
`11 to 41 months (mean 22 months).
`Three of four patients had a significant reduction
`in pemphigus antibody titers during treatment. Pa-
`tients 1 and 2 had a twofold decrease. Patient l 0 had
`an initial titer of 1:2560 that became negative dur-
`ing treatment.
`Both patients with LABD achieved rapid and
`complete clearing. However, patient 12 discontin-
`ued therapy after 2 months because of persistent
`headaches. He has subsequently remained clear
`
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`Eleven patients with pemphigus (six with pem-
`phigus vulgaris [PV], three with pemphigus folia-
`ceus [PF], two with pemphigus erythematosus [PE])
`and two patients with LABD were treated with nic-
`otinamide, 1.5 gmjday, and tetracycline, 2 gmjday,
`with or without oral corticosteroids as summarized
`in Table I. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed in
`all cases by routine histopathology and immunoflu-
`orescence studies.
`Therapeutic responses were graded by the degree
`of clinical improvement after 8 weeks of treatment.
`Responses were recorded as follows: complete re-
`sponse ( CR) = total clearing of lesions; partial re-
`sponse (PR) = clearing of more than 50% of lesions;
`and no response (NR) = clearing less than 50% of
`lesions or worsening of the disease.
`
`From the Departments of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit";
`a nd Da rtmouth University, Hanoverb
`Reprint requests: Marsha L. C haffins, MD, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799
`W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202.
`J AM A CAD D ERMATOL 1993;28:998-1 000.
`Copyright © 1993 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
`0190-9622/93$1.00 + .10 16/ 54/ 43729
`
`998
`
`Exh. 1065
`
`

`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`Volume 28, Number 6
`
`Brief communications 999
`
`Table I. History and therapeutic response of patients treated with nicotinamide and tetracycline for
`autoimmune bullous diseases
`
`Diagnosis
`
`Concurrent trea trnent
`
`Response*
`
`Follow-up
`period (mo)
`
`Patient
`
`I
`2
`3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`lO
`I I
`12
`
`Age (yr)/
`Sex
`
`34/M
`47/F
`71/F
`
`81/M
`57/F
`41/F
`60/F
`51/M
`50/M
`28/F
`73/M
`70/M
`
`PV
`PV
`PV
`
`PV
`PV, oral
`PV, oral
`PF
`PF
`PF
`PE
`PE
`LABD
`
`Topical steroids
`Prednisone, 5 mg q.o.d.-30 mg q.d.
`Prednisone, 5 mgj day
`Azathioprine, !50 mgjday
`Topical steroids
`Prednisone, 2.5 mgjday
`Prednisone, 10 mgjday
`None
`Topical steroids
`Topical steroids
`Prednisone, 7.5-0 mgj day
`None
`Antihistamines, topical steroids
`
`CR
`PR
`PR
`
`CR
`CR
`NR
`CR
`CR
`PR
`PR
`NR
`CR
`
`8
`6
`10
`
`9
`14
`
`24
`41
`11
`13
`
`2 mowj
`medication,
`I I mo clear
`19
`
`13
`
`69/F
`
`LABD
`
`Topical steroids
`
`CR
`LABD, Linear IgA bullous dermatosis; PE, pemphigus erythematosus; PF, pemphigus foliaceus; PV, pemphigus vulgaris.
`*Responses graded as: CR =complete response (all lesions resolved) after 8 weeks of nicotinamide/tetracycline; PR =partial response (>50% of le-
`sions resolved) after 8 weeks of nicotinamide/tetracycline; NR =no response (<50% of lesions resolved) or worsening of disease after 8 weeks of nic-
`otinamide/tetracycline.
`
`with topical steroid therapy for approximately I
`year. Patient 13 (previously reported in Peoples and
`Fivenson5) has remained clear for more than 2 years
`with nicotinamide and tetracycline therapy.
`Eight of the 13 patients reported no adverse
`effects. There were no abnormalities in any patient's
`serum chemical or hematologic findings. Four pa-
`tients experienced nausea, abdominal discomfort,
`and mild diarrhea. Gastrointestinal symptoms were
`relieved in three patients when minocycline, 100 mg
`twice a day, was substituted for tetracycline and in
`the fourth patient when the dose of tetracycline was
`reduced to 1.5 gmjday. Patient 10 developed a gen-
`eralized morbilliform eruption that was believed to
`be caused by tetracycline but was able to tolerate
`minocycline, 100 mg twice a day. Patient 12 expe-
`rienced headaches with nicotinamide and tetracy-
`cline, as well as with nicotinamide and minocycline.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Although this is an uncontrolled study with a
`limited follow-up period, the preliminary results ap-
`pear promising. Six of 11 patients with pemphigus
`and two patients with LABD were able to be
`controlled with nicotinamide and tetracycline as
`their only oral agents. We should emphasize that
`this combination was adequate therapy in only two
`
`of six patients with PV. The role of these agents in
`PV appears to be that of a steroid-sparing adjuvant,
`rather than a steroid alternative. The combination of
`nicotinamide and tetracycline was found to be an
`effective alternative to steroids in superficial pem-
`phigus (PE and PF) and LABD in six of seven pa-
`tients.
`The primary advantage nicotinamide and tetra-
`cycline offer over corticosteroids and immunosup-
`pressive agents is a broader safety profile. The most
`common side effect in our patients was gastrointes-
`tinal upset. In higher doses, nicotinamide has been
`reported to produce flushing, pruritus, headache,
`vomiting, and a flu-like syndrome. 7·9 Acanthosis ni-
`gricans, ichthyosiform skin changes, and hepatotox-
`icity have also been reported. 8• 10• 11 The side effects
`of tetracycline are well known and have been
`reviewed elsewhere. 12• 13
`Because this study is uncontrolled, it is possible
`that a selection bias towards patients with a ten-
`dency toward milder disease or spontaneous remis-
`sion may have occurred. However, the fact that sev-
`eral of our patients (7, 8, 10, and 13) had recurrences
`when nicotinamide and tetracycline were discontin-
`ued argues against this explanation for the thera-
`peutic results.
`The mechanism of action of nicotinamide and
`
`Exh. 1065
`
`

`
`1000 Brief communications
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`June 1993
`
`tetracycline in the treatment of autoimmune bullous
`disorders is unknown.6 Nicotinamide inhibits poly-
`morphonuclear cell (PMN) and eosinophil chemo-
`taxis and blocks IgE-mediated histamine release and
`mast cell degranulation. 14-17 The infiltrate in both
`pemphigus and BP is rich in eosinophils; thus
`eosinophil inhibition may be part of the mechanism
`of action for the observed efficacy in these disorders.
`Similarly, inhibition ofPMNs may contribute to the
`results observed in LABD.
`Another likely explanation for the therapeutic re-
`sults are the effects that nicotinamide and tetracy-
`cline have on lymphocyte function. Both agents in-
`hibit lymphocyte blast transformation in vitro. 17-19
`This effect combined with the inhibition of PMN
`and eosinophil chemotaxis could serve to downgrade
`both the afferent and efferent limbs of humoral im-
`mune responses. The decrease in intercellular sub-
`stance antibody titer observed in some patients after
`treatment with nicotinamide and tetracycline sup-
`ports this suppression of lymphocyte (B cell) activ-
`ity.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Rosenberg FR, Sanders S, Nelson CT. Pemphigus: a 20
`year review of I 07 patients treated with corticosteroids.
`Arch Dermatol 1976;112:962-70.
`2. Ahmed AR, Moy R. Death in pemphigus. J AM ACAD
`DERMATOL 1982;7:221-8.
`3. Jablonska S, Chorzelski TP, Blaszczyk M. Immunosup-
`pressants in the treatment of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol
`1970;83:3 15-22.
`4. McDonald CJ. Use of cytotoxic drugs in dermatologic dis-
`eases. I and II. JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1985;12:753-2,
`965-75.
`5. Peoples D, Fivenson DP. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis:
`
`successful treatment with tetracycline and niacinamide. J
`AM ACAD DERMATOL 1992;26:498-9.
`.
`6. Berk MA, Lorincz AL. The treatment of bullous pemphi-
`goid with tetracycline and nicotinamide: a preliminary re-
`port. Arch Derma to! 1986; 122:670-4.
`7. Parsons WB Jr. Treatment of hypercholesterolemia by
`nicotinic acid: progress report with review of studies re-
`garding mechanism of action. Arch Intern Med 1951;
`4:736-7.
`8. Zackheim HS, Yasily DB, Westphal ML, eta!. Reactions
`to nicotinamide [Letter]. JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1981;
`4:736-7.
`9. Hoffler A. Safety, side-effects, and relative lack of toxicity
`of nicotinic acid and nicotinamide. Schizophrenia 1969;
`1:78-9.
`10. Brown J, Winkleman RK. Acanthosis nigricans: a study of
`90 cases. Medicine 1968;47:33-51.
`II . Winter SL, Boyer JL. Hepatic toxicity from large doses of
`vitamin B3 (nicotinamide). N Eng! J Med 1973;289: 1180-2.
`12. Bruce S, Wolf JE. Antibacterial agents. In: Wolverton SE,
`Wilkin JK, eds. Systemic drugs for skin disease. Philadel-
`phia: WB Saunders, 1991 .
`13. Wright AL, Colver GB. Tetracyclines: How safe are they?
`Clin Exp Dermatol1988;13:57-61.
`14. Cohen BM. A niacinamide-theophylline compound (RC-
`C-144): human and blood level studies. J Asthma Res
`1966;4:7 5-9.
`I 5. Cohen BM. A niacinamide-theophylline compound (RC-
`C-144): clinical and spirometric effects. J Asthma Res
`1966;4:81-7.
`16. Berkier E, Masinski C. Antihistaminic action of nicotina-
`.
`mide. Agents Action 1974;4: 196.
`17. Burger DR, Vanden bark AA Daves D, et a!. Nicotina-
`mide: suppression of lymph0::yte transformation with a
`component identified in human transfer factor. J Immunol
`1976;117:797-801.
`18. Thong YH, Ferrante A. Inhibition of mitogen induced hu-
`man lymphocyte proliferative responses to tetracycline an-
`alogues. Clin Exp lmmunol 1979;35:443-6.
`19. Banck G, Forsgren A. Antibiotics and suppression of lym-
`phocyte function in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
`1979;16:554-60.
`
`Exh. 1065

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket