throbber
infection and rosacea, we found a more
`between HP
`favourable clinical response to anti-HP treatment in the
`CLO-positive than in the CLO-negative group of rosacea
`patients. Our results support the theory that HP is not the
`direct cause of rosacea but that it may be an aggravating
`factor, probably more in the erythematous type than in the
`papular and glandular types. However, to establish the exact
`causative role of HP in rosacea, studies with a larger group
`of patients must be carried out.
`
`Departments of Dermatology
`and *Internal Medicine,
`Korea University College of Medicine,
`Guro 152-703,
`Seoul,
`Korea
`
`S.W.SoN
`I. H. KIM
`C.H.OH
`J.G.KIM*
`
`References
`1 Parish LC, Witkowski JA. Acne rosacea and Helicobacter pylori
`betrothed. Int J Dermatol1995; 34: 236-7.
`2 Rebora A. Drago F. Parodi A. May Helicobacter pylori be important
`for dermatologists? Dermatology 1995; 191: 6-8.
`3 Rebora A, Drago F, Picciotto A. Helicobacter pylori in patients with
`rosacea. Am J Gastroenterol1994; 89: 1603-4.
`4 Kolibasova K, T6thova I, Baumgartner J, Fila V. Eradication of
`Helicobacter pylori as the only successful treatment in rosacea.
`(Letter.) Arch Dermatol 1996; 132: 1393.
`5 Powell PC, Dawa MA, Duguid C. Positive Helicobacter pylori serology
`in rosacea patients. Ir J Med Sci 1992; 161: S75 (Abstr.).
`6 Schneider MA, Skinner RBJ, Rosenberg EW et al. Serological
`determination of Helicobacter pylori in rosacea patients and controls.
`Clin Res 1992; 40: 831A (Abstr.).
`7 Malaty HM, Kim JG, Kim SD et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori
`infection in Korean children: inverse relation to socioeconomic
`status despite a uniformly high prevalence in adults. Am J Epidemiol
`1996; 143: 257-62.
`8 Sharma VK, Lynn A, Kaminski M et al. A study of the
`prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and other markers of
`upper gastrointestinal tract disease in patients with rosacea. Am
`J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 220-2.
`
`Minocycline for the treatment of cutaneous silicone
`granulomas
`SIR, Granulomatous reactions named siliconomas have been
`reported after silicone injections in face or breast soft tissues
`and after silicone implants. 1 Treatment of siliconoma is
`difficult and often requires surgical excision. We report two
`patients with exuberant siliconoma who were successfully
`treated with minocycline.
`The first patient, a 49-year-old woman, presented with a
`diffuse, erythematous and indurated facial oedema (Fig. 1a).
`Cervical lymphadenopathy was also noted. Histopathological
`examination of a skin biopsy showed vacuoles in the dermis
`surrounded by a dense mononuclear infiltrate (Fig. 2). A clear,
`greasy material extracted from a fresh biopsy was identified as
`dimethylsiloxane oil by Fourier transformed infrared spectro-
`scopy. The likely cause was treatment of facial wrinkles by
`
`CORRESPONDENCE
`
`985
`
`local injections over a 3-year period, 8 years ago. Prednisone
`1 mg/kg per day was first given, but 4 days later the patient
`developed glucose intolerance for which she required insulin
`therapy. Because of the glucose intolerance and the lack of
`efficacy of high doses of prednisone, minocycline 100 mg twice
`daily was added as adjuvant therapy to
`the previous
`corticosteroid regimen.
`The clinical response of cutaneous symptoms was notice-
`able 3 weeks after the introduction of the minocycline and
`allowed a rapid reduction of the prednisone dosage. The
`erythematous indurated oedema of the face progressively
`decreased, leading to a complete resolution in 8 weeks (Fig.
`1b). Prednisone was stopped 4 months after the onset of
`minocycline therapy. Two months later the dose of mino-
`cycline was reduced to 100 mg once daily. The oedema
`reappeared clearly on the lower eyelids. Complete resolution
`was again rapidly obtained when the dosage of minocycline
`was increased once more to 100 mg twice daily.
`The second patient, a 3 9-year-old woman, received illicit
`fluid silicone injections in the soft tissue of the breasts 5 years
`ago. She developed erythematous lesions which began 2
`months after the injections. There was a progressive extension
`of indurated painful subcutaneous masses on the breasts and
`painful enlarged axillary lymph nodes. Histopathological
`examination of a skin biopsy showed vacuoles in the dermis
`surrounded with a mononuclear cellular infiltrate. Surgical
`excision was not possible because of the extension of lesions,
`leading to the introduction of minocycline as first-line therapy
`at the same dosage as that in the first case. Regression of the
`inflammatory symptoms and induration began 3 weeks after
`starting minocycline, and the patient's condition was still
`improving after 2 months.
`The tolerance to the treatment was excellent in both cases.
`Many local and general adverse effects were reported after
`cosmetic usage2 of silicone oil (polydimethylsiloxane) injec-
`tions and its use was progressively abandoned. However, illicit
`silicone injections are still performed. 3 Injected silicone is
`responsible for granulomatous tissue reactions like foreign
`body granuloma occurring from a few months to 15 years3- 5
`after injection. These reactions were reported at the site of
`the injection but also in the lymph nodes and in the liver
`because of migration of silicone particles. 2•3 The treatment of
`siliconoma is difficult and, until now, surgical excision is
`warranted when possible. 5 Even though corticosteroids have
`beneficial effects in the treatment of granulomatous diseases
`lilce sarcoidosis, their usage is often associated with serious
`adverse effects, such as glucose intolerance in our first case
`and drug dependence leading to a relapse of symptoms when
`prednisone dosage is tapered.
`Minocycline is considered a major drug in the treatment of
`various dermatoses like acne, rosacea and perioral dermatitis,
`and more recently in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
`The beneficial effects of minocycline are related to anti-
`inflammatory and/ or immunomodulating effects and to
`antigranulomatous properties which have been demonstrated
`in vitro. 6- 8 These data lead to the proposal of minocycline as a
`therapeutic agent for granulomatous skin reactions.
`
`© 1999 British Association of Dermatologists, British Journal of Dermatology, 140, 963-991
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1059
`
`Exh. 1059
`
`

`
`986
`
`CORRESPONDENCE
`
`Figure 1. Patient 1. (a) Diffuse
`erythematous and indurated oedema of the
`face before treatment with minocycline. (b)
`Resolution of the oedema 2 months after
`the beginning of minocycline therapy.
`
`Figure 2. Phagocytic granuloma with
`lipidic droplets resorption (haematoxylin
`and eosin, original magnification, · 200).
`
`For both patients, our follow-up period is still short. The
`duration of the treatment may need to be long, possibly
`increasing the risk of adverse effects such as pigmentation.
`These two cases support a role for minocycline in the
`management of severe granulomas induced by silicone use
`when surgical excision is not possible.
`
`*Service d’Anatomopathologie,
`Hoˆpital Saint-Louis,
`1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux,
`75475 Paris Cedex 10,
`France
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`We thank Dr MF Grenier for helpful discussion and for
`biochemical analysis of the skin biopsy.
`
`Service de Dermatologie,
`Institut de Recherche sur la Peau,
`Pavillon Bazin,
`Paris,
`France
`
`P.SENET
`H.BACHELEZ
`L.OLLIVAUD
`D.VIGNON-PENNAMEN*
`L.DUBERTRET
`
`References
`
`1 Faure M. Complications des implants de silicone et autres mate´riaux
`dits inertes. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1995; 122: 455–9.
`2 Ellenbogen R, Ellenbogen R, Rubin L. Injectable fluid silicone
`therapy. Human morbidity and mortality.
`JAMA 1975; 234:
`308–9.
`3 Travis WD, Balogh K, Abraham JL. Silicone granulomas: Report of
`three cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 1985; 16:
`19–27.
`4 Achauer BM. A serious complication following medical-grade
`silicone injection of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 71: 251–4.
`
`q 1999 British Association of Dermatologists, British Journal of Dermatology, 140, 963–991
`
`Exh. 1059
`
`

`
`CORRESPONDENCE
`
`987
`
`to
`the lower leg may be difficult
`Bowen’s disease of
`treat, particularly in the elderly, who may have thin skin and
`venous disease. Excision with direct closure may be impossible,
`and skin grafts or flaps heal poorly on the lower leg.7 With
`cryotherapy, morbidity can be high and healing slow.8
`Radiotherapy is seldom used on the lower leg because of
`radiation necrosis and prolonged ulceration.9 There is a
`recurrence rate of 25%10 for all treatments in Bowen’s disease,
`possibly related to ill-defined margins and follicular involve-
`ment.10 A recurrence rate of 72% after curettage/cautery and
`87% after radiotherapy has been reported.11
`Actinic keratoses and Bowen’s disease are frequently treated
`with topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), twice daily for several
`weeks, until the lesions become inflamed.11,12 Aggressive
`treatment may cause ulceration, and there is a recurrence rate
`of 8%.10 We have examined the efficacy of weekly ‘pulse’ 5-FU
`cream (Efudix, Roche) for managing Bowen’s disease of the
`lower leg.
`Twenty-six women (mean age 76 years; range 55–95
`years) presented with Bowen’s disease of the lower leg, present
`for up to 12 years. The diagnosis was confirmed histologically.
`The sites of the lesions were recorded and photographed.
`Patients were instructed to apply 5-FU cream to the lesions
`in the morning and evening on 1 day each week and given
`an information sheet
`that explained the treatment. We
`emphasized the importance of applying cream to a rim of
`normal-looking skin around the whole plaque. Treatment
`
`5 Rees TD, Ballantyne DL, Seidman I. Eyelid deformities caused by
`injection of silicone fluid. Br J Plast Surg 1971; 24: 125–8.
`6 Celerier P, Litoux P, Dreno B. In vitro modulation of epidermal
`inflammatory cytokines (IL-1a, IL-6, TNFa) by minocycline. Arch
`Dermatol Res 1996; 288: 411–14.
`7 Webster GF, Toso Sm, Hegemann L. Inhibition of a model of in vitro
`granuloma formation by tetracyclines and ciprofloxacin. Involve-
`ment of protein kinase C. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130: 748–52.
`8 Tilley BC, Alarcon GS, Heyse SP et al. Minocycline in rheumatoid
`arthritis. A 48-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann
`Intern Med 1995; 122: 81–9.
`
`Bowen’s disease of the leg treated with weekly pulses of 5%
`fluorouracil cream
`
`SIR, Bowen’s disease is a premalignant dermatosis charac-
`terized histologically as carcinoma in situ with full-thickness
`dysplasia of the epidermis. It mainly affects the elderly1 and
`occurs particularly on sun-exposed sites, predominantly the
`lower legs in women and the scalp and ears in men.1,2 Left
`untreated, 3–5% of patients may develop invasive carci-
`noma.3,4 Among 74 patients with Bowen’s disease, invasive
`carcinoma developed in eight over a 10-year period.5 Bowen’s
`disease has a low malignant potential, and metastases develop
`in less than 1% of cases.6
`
`Table 1. Patient details (all are women) and the results of treatment
`
`Age (years)
`
`Duration of
`treatment
`(months)
`
`Outcome
`(? clear)
`
`Rim active?
`
`69
`82
`81
`84
`80
`79
`92
`80
`86
`65
`61
`85
`55
`68
`71
`59
`63
`80
`61
`77
`85
`79
`76
`95
`80
`75
`
`6
`6
`3
`3
`3
`4
`6
`4
`2
`3
`6
`4
`3
`4
`4
`2
`6
`4
`5
`6
`6
`4
`4
`4
`3
`6
`
`no
`no
`yes
`no
`yes
`no
`yes
`no
`yes
`no
`nob
`yes
`no
`yes
`yes
`yesa
`no
`yes
`nob
`no
`no
`no
`yes
`yes
`yes
`no
`
`yes
`yes
`no
`yes
`no
`yes
`no
`yes
`no
`yes
`all active
`no
`yes
`no
`no
`no
`yes
`no
`all active
`yes
`yes
`yes
`no
`no
`no
`yes
`
`a Ulcer developed.
`b No benefit gained.
`
`Figure 1. (a) Two areas of Bowen’s disease are evident on the lower left
`leg. (b) The lesions cleared after 3 months of treatment with pulsed
`5-fluorouracil cream.
`
`q 1999 British Association of Dermatologists, British Journal of Dermatology, 140, 963–991
`
`Exh. 1059

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket