throbber
United States Patent [t9J
`Golub et al.
`
`(ttl Patent Number:
`(45] Date of Patent:
`
`4,666,897
`May 19, 1987
`
`[54]
`
`[75]
`
`INHIBITION OF MAMMALIAN
`COLLAGENOLYTIC ENZYMES BY
`TETRACYCLINES
`Inventors: Lorne M. Golub, Smithtown; Thomas
`F. McNamara, Port Jefferson; N. S.
`Ramamurthy, Smithtown, all of N.Y.
`(73] Assignee: Research Foundation of State
`University, Albany, N.Y.
`(21] Appl. No.: 566,517
`[22] Filed:
`Dec. 29, 1983
`Int. CJ,4 .............................................. A61K 31/65
`[51]
`[52) u.s. Cl ..................................................... 514/152
`[58] Field of Search ......................... 424/227; 514/152
`[56]
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2,895,880 7/1959 Rosenthal ........................... 424/227
`4,248,892 2/1981 Kanamaru eta!. ................. 424/317
`4,371,465 2/1983 McGregor .......................... 424/177
`4,457, 936 7/1984 Draeger et a!. ..................... 424/270
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Bauer, et al., 1983, J. Invest. Dermatol., vol. 81, pp. 162,
`163 168.
`Harris, eta!., 1984, Collagen Rei. Res., vol. 4, p. 493.
`Berman and Manabe, 1973, Ann. Ophthalmol., Nov., p.
`1193.
`Golub, et a!., 1985, J. Periodontal Res., vol. 20, pp.
`12-23.
`Welgus and Stricklin, 1983, J. Bioi. Chern., vol. 258, p.
`12259.
`Uitto, eta!., 1984, J. Oral. Path., vol. 13, p. 412.
`
`Narayanan and Page., 1983, Collagen Rei. Res., vol. 3,
`p. 54.
`Golub, eta!., 1985, J. Periodontal. Res., Special Issue, p.
`93.
`Vater, et al., 1978, J. Clin. Invest., vol. 62, p. 987.
`Harris, et al., 1984, Collagen Rei. Res., vol. 4, pp.
`504-505.
`Cowen, eta!., 1985, Biochem. International, vol. 11, p.
`273.
`Belaisse, eta!., 1985, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,
`vol. 133, p. 483.
`Golub, et al., 1983, J. Periodontal Res., vol. 18, pp.
`516-526.
`Chemical Abstracts 100:96203a (1983).
`Chemical Abstracts, 93:142977t (1980).
`Chemical Abstracts, 76:30596k (1969).
`Dreisbach et al., Induction of Collagenase Production
`in Vibrio B-30, J. Bacterial, vol. 135, No.2 (1978) pp.
`521-527.
`Goodman and Gilman, The Pharmacological Basis of
`Therapeutics, 6th ed., pp. 961-962 (1980).
`Primary Examiner-Albert T. Meyers
`Assistant Examiner-John M. Kilcoyne
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Omri M. Behr
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`A method of reducing pathologically excessive levels of
`activity of collagenolytic enzymes in mammals to sub-
`stantially normal levels by administering 10-100% of
`the normal antibiotic therapeutic dose of a tetracycline
`is disclosed.
`
`10 Claims, 8 Drawing Figures
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-_ _
`Exhibit 1050
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent May 19, 1987
`
`Sheet 1 of4
`
`4,666,897
`
`14
`
`12
`
`m INTERPROXIMAL
`D LINGUAL
`
`FIG.Ib
`
`FIG.Ia
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`U. S. Patent May 19, 1987
`
`Sheet2 of4
`
`4,666,897
`
`II INTERPROXIMAL
`D LINGUAL
`
`10
`
`e 12
`:::;;:: = = .....__
`U? if.i
`U?!:= == _J=
`=<...::> == ~
`
`LJ..J-
`ZLJ..J
`
`U')
`0
`
`6~~~~~~~~~=~
`CONTROL
`DIABETES
`DIABEl +
`MINOCYCL.
`
`FIG.2b
`
`80
`
`40
`
`:;_ ~ 60
`1- =
`~~
`1- <..!)
`<...::> LJ..J
`<C =
`<...::> =
`i=~
`~:5 =_J
`r5 8
`~I
`=1st:,
`8cfi. o~-L--~-L--~~--~
`DIABEl +
`CONTROL
`DIABETES
`MINOCYCL.
`
`20
`
`FIG.2a
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent May 19, 1987
`
`Sheet 3 of4
`
`4,666,897
`
`"0>
`_§
`= <C
`
`<..!)
`
`0:: = --LL.J = ---' = 0::
`>->< = 0:: = >-=
`
`0...
`
`1200
`
`1000
`
`800
`
`-.... ' ' ' '
`
`'-- C (CONVENTIONALl
`
`',"
`D(CONVENTIONALl
`·----,(
`'--.,
`
`(GERM-FREE)
`
`O 0
`
`6
`5
`I
`TIME (WEEKS AFTER STREPTOZ.OTOCIN ADMIN.)
`
`FIG.3
`
`---' <C = ::2
`1-= LL.J > = = <...>
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`V. S. Patent May 19, 1987
`
`Sheet4 of4
`
`4,666,897
`
`__:
`<:.9
`
`3
`
`2
`
`0
`
`PEN.
`+
`
`MIN.
`
`•
`
`120
`
`w... 80
`<...>
`(.!)
`
`PD
`
`KD
`
`40
`
`0
`
`PEN.
`+
`
`f+
`PD
`
`MIN.
`
`•
`
`K.~
`
`6
`
`~ 4
`E
`E
`
`0
`0....
`
`2
`
`0
`
`PEN.
`+
`
`MIN.
`~
`
`PD
`
`KD
`
`FIG.4
`
`MIN.
`J +
`
`PEN .
`
`•
`
`FIG.4b
`MIN.
`
`PD
`
`· KD ·
`
`ACTIVE ENZYME
`
`D TRYPSIN-ACTIVED ENZYME
`
`/TRYPSIN CONTROL
`
`~~~~~==~~~~===-
`
`PO
`
`KD
`
`FIG.4a
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`4,666,897
`
`1
`INHIBITION OF MAMMALIAN
`COLLAGENOLYTIC ENZYMES BY
`TETRACYCLINES
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`Collagenase is an enzyme normally present in mam-
`mals. The enzyme, which is produced in a number of
`body tissues and cells, degrades collagen, (the major
`structural protein of connective tissues, such as those in 10
`bone, skin, tendon and gingiva) normally during con-
`nective tissue remodeling. However, when collagenase,
`is produced in excessive amounts, then the pathologic
`destruction of these tissues is the result. This excessive
`collagenase production has been observed to occur in a 15
`number of disease states such as hyperparathyroidism,
`diabetes, periodontal disease and rheumatoid arthritis.
`The results of excess collagenolysis are serious and
`debilitating, such as excessive resorption of bone associ-
`ated with hyperparathyroidism, the ulceration of the 20
`cornea, the destruction of joint tissue associated with
`rheumatoid arthritis, and the breakdown of the gingival
`collagen fibers and the bony socket associated with
`periodontal disease.
`In recent years, tetracycline has been advocated as an 25
`adjunct in the treatment ofperiodontal diseases, includ-
`ing chronic periodontitis in the adult (Fasciano and
`Fazio, Quintessence
`International, October, #10,
`1081-1088 (I 981)) and more often, for rapidly progres-
`singjuvenile periodontitis (Slots, et al., J. Peridontol, 50, 30
`405-509 (1979)); Genco, et al., J. Dent. Res. 60, Special
`lssue A, Abstract 872 (1981). lts therapeutic efficacy
`has been attributed solely to the drug's antimicrobial
`activity particularly against specific Gram-negative
`organisms believed to be the cause of these diseases 35
`(Genco, J. Periodontol, 52, 545-558 (1981)). Recently,
`Williams, et al., J. Peridontal Res. , 16, 666-674 (1981)
`described a significant improvement in periodontal dis-
`ease in dogs on Iang-term tetracycline therapy, an effect
`that did not appear to correlate with expected shifts in 40
`the crevicular microflora. Williams, et. al. concluded
`that the beneficial effect of tetracycline must have re-
`sulted from the Suppression of a strain of bacteria that
`was not measured in their study. Similar clinical
`changes were observed in a limited number of human 45
`subjects. Tetracycline therapy in periodontal disease
`has also been evaluated by Ciancio, J. Periodontol., 43,
`155-159 (1976) and Ciancio, et al., J. Periodontol, 51,
`531-534 (1980). Kornman & Kar!, (1982, J. Periodontol.,
`53, 604-610) reported that the Iang-term use of tetracy- 50
`cline was clinically beneficial in patients who did not
`respond to routine periodontal therapy (debridement by
`instrumentation). In all of these studies, the only per-
`ceived value of tetracyclines is an antibacterial drug.
`Diabetes in rats and humans has been found to in- 55
`crease tissue collagenase activity. Evidence for this
`effect was seen in extracts of gingiva and skin (Rama-
`murthy and Golub, J. Periodontal Res., 18., 31-39
`(1983)) andin cultures of gingival tissue (Ramamurthy,
`et al., J. Periodontal Res., 9, 199-206 (1974); Golub, et 60
`al., J. Dent. Res., 57, 520-525, 1978; Kaplan, et al., J.
`Dent. Res., 61, Special Issue, 275 (1982)). Unusually
`severe periodontal disease which occurs during diabetes
`in man (Finestone and Boorujy, Diabetes, 16, 336-340,
`1967; Cianciola, et al., J.A.D.A., 104, 653-660 (I 982)) 65
`and experimental animals (Bissada, et al., Periodontics.,
`4, 223 (1966)), reflects accelerated collagen breakdown
`which could be mediated by the excessive collagenase
`
`2
`generated during this systemic disease. lt has been sug-
`gested that the overgrowth of Gram-negative organ-
`isms in the gingival crevice of the diabetic rat could, by
`generating excessive endotoxin in the area, be the cause
`5 of the abnormally high collagenase Ievels in the gingiva
`(McNamara et al., Archs. Oral Bio/., 27, 217-223 (1982)).
`Additionally, it has been reported that tetracycline is
`effective in
`the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
`(Brown, et al., Comp. Pathol. ZooAnimals, (eds. Montali
`& Migaki), Smithsonian Institution Press, 259-266
`(1980)). Brown's solerationale for the use of these anti-
`biotics is to eliminate infection of the joint tissues with
`the "mycoplasma group of microorganisms which he
`believes is the cause of arthritis. However, there has
`been heretofore no recognition of the ability of tetracy-
`cline to reduce pathologically excessive Ievels of collag-
`enolytic enzyme(s) (such as collagenase) activity to
`substantially normal Ievels.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to a method of reducing
`pathologically excessive amounts of collagenolytic en-
`zyme(s) activity in a mammalian system. More particu-
`larly, this invention relates to a method of reducing
`such excess collagenase or other collagenolytic en-
`zymes such as elastase or gelatinase to substantially
`normal Ievels which comprises administering to mam-
`mals in need of anti-collagenase therapy an anti-collage-
`nase effective amount of a tetracycline.
`For convenience sake, the presently marketed dosage
`forms of the various tetracyclines may be utilized in the
`method of the present invention without substantial
`change. This is especially facilitative to the practice of
`the invention. Tetracyclines and their various dosage
`forms have been utilized for many years and the side
`effects from such dosage forms are weil studied, weil
`recognized, and minimized by the said dosage forms.
`The method ofthe present invention involving reduc-
`ing excessive collagenolytic enzyme activity Ievels to
`normal Ievels can be used to treat conditions in a num-
`ber of diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, peri-
`odontal disease and ulcerated corneae. These disease
`states (and others) all exhibit the pathological effects of
`excessive collagenase Ievels which include excessive
`resorption of bone, destruction of joint tissue, break-
`down of the gingival collagen fibers and the bony sock-
`ets, and ulceration of the cornea, as weil as other de-
`struction of collagen containing tissue. While other
`manifestations of these disease states may be treated
`with supplementary drugs, i.e., inflammation in rheuma-
`toid arthritis, or infection in periodontal disease, the use
`of the tetracycline will serve to reduce the excessive
`collagenase Ievels and collagenolytic activity to a nor-
`mal Ievel. This anti-collagenase thereapy is valuable
`supplementary aid for use by a medical practitioner in
`the treatment and control of such diseases as described
`above.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRA WINGS
`FIG. I (a & b ) are block graphs of a) Collagenolytic
`activity, and b) bone lass in conventional diabetic rats.
`FIG. II (a & b) are similar to FIG. I, a & b except that
`the rats arealso germ-free.
`FIG. 111 shows the effect of minocycline on the skin
`collagen Ievels of streptozotocin diabetic rats.
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`4,666,897
`
`3
`FIG. IV shows the effects of penicillin and minocy-
`cline on gingival disease and on GCF collagenolytic
`activity in twin young diabetic males.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`The tetracycline utilized in the present invention may
`be any of the readily available, pharmaceutically ac-
`ceptable tetracycline known in the medical art. In-
`cluded in this group of tetracyclines are those such as 10
`chlortetracycline, which is marketed under the trade-
`name Acronize, Aureocina, Aureomycin, Biomitsin,
`Biomycin and Chrysomykine; Demeclyeycline mar-
`keted as Ledermycin, Detravis, Meciclin, and Mexo-
`cine; Doxycycline marketed as Vibramycin, Vibra- 15
`mycin Hyclace, Liomycin Vibradox, Panamycin, Titra-
`dox, Hydramycin, Tecacin; Lymecycline which is mar-
`keted as Armyl, Mucomycin, Tetramyl, Tetralysal;
`Methacycline which is marketed as Adriamicina, Cy-
`clobiotic, Germicilclin, Globociclina, Megamycine, 20
`Pindex, Londomycin, Optimycin, Rondomycin; Mino-
`cycline which is marketed as Minocin, Klinomycin,
`Vectrin; Oxytetracycline which is marketed Biostat,
`Oxacycline, Oxatets, Oxydon, Oxymycin, Oxytan, Ox-
`ytetracid, Ryomycin, Stezazin, Tetraject, Terramycin, 25
`Tetramel, Tetran, Dendarcin, Dendrcin; Rolitetracy-
`cline marketed as Bristacin, Reverin, Superciclin, Syn-
`tetrex, Syntetrin, Synotodecin, Tetraverin, Transcy-
`cline, Velacicline, Velacycline; and Tetracycline mar-
`keted as Achromycin, Ambramycin, Cyclomycin, Pol- 30
`ycycline, Tetrabon, and Tetracyn.
`The active salts, which are formed through proton-
`ation of the dimethylamino group on carbon atom 4,
`exist as crystalline compounds and are very viable in
`water. However, these amphoteric antibiotics will crys- 35
`tallize out of aqueous solutions of their salts unless stabi-
`lized by an excess of acid. The hydrochloride salts are
`used most commonly for oral administration and are
`usually encapsulated because of their bitter taste. Water
`soluble salts may be obtained also from bases such as 40
`sodium or potassium hydroxides but are not stable in
`aqueous solution, they are also formed with divalent
`and polyvalent metals, these forms, though operative
`are not preferred.
`The tetracyclines used in the method of the present 45
`invention are preferably administered at a dosage Ievel
`of from 10 to 100%, suitably 20-80%, of the normal
`antibiotic therapeutic dose of the particular tetracycline
`compound being employed. By normal antibiotic thera-
`peutic dose is meant the dosage of the particular tetra- 50
`cycline compound which is commonly used and recom-
`mended for the treatment of bacterial infection. More
`than 100% of the normal antibiotic therapeutic dose
`may be utilized in the method of the present invention
`but there is no particular advantage in doing so and such 55
`over-dosage may in fact Iead to complications.
`The present invention is intended for use as long term
`(as weil as short-term, or even episodic) therapy. The
`long term administration of tetracyclines at antibioti-
`cally effective dose Ievels may have a negative effect on 60
`healthy flora such as intestinal flora and may also Iead
`to the production of resistant organisms. These disad-
`vantages are substantially reduced by the use of sub-
`antibiotic dosages.
`The normal antibiotic therapeutic dose of the tetracy- 65
`cline is, for the most part, weil studied and weil docu-
`mented so that few, if any, side effects other than those
`mentioned above can be anticipated in using this safe
`
`4
`dosage Ievel for the reduction of excess collagenase to a
`normal collagenase Ievel. For instance, the normal and
`usual dose of tetracycline is, orally, the equiva1ent of
`250 mg. of tetracycline hydrochloride 4 times daily;
`5 intramuscular, the equivalent of 100 mg. of tetracycline
`hydrochloride 2 or 3 times daily; intravenous infusion,
`the equivalent of 250-500 mg. of tetracycline hydro-
`chloride over a period of! to 1 hour, twice daily. And
`the usual dosage range, orally, is the equivalent of 1-4 g.
`of tetracycline hydrochloride daily; intramuscularly,
`the equivalent of 200-500 mg. of tetracycline hydro-
`chloride daily; and intravenously, the equivalent of 500
`mg. to 2 g. of tetracycline hydrochloride daily.
`For rolitetracycline, the usual dose range is intramus-
`cularly, 150-350 mg. every 12 hours; and intravenously,
`350-700 mg. every 12 hours. For chlortetracycline the
`usual daily dose range is 250-500 mg.
`When oxytetracycline is utilized the usual dose is,
`orally, 250 mg. 4 times daily; intra-muscularly, 100 mg.
`2 or 3 times daily; intravenously, 250-500 mg. over a
`period of! to 1 hour twice daily. The usual dose range
`is orally, 1 to 4 g. daily; intramuscularly, 200-500 mg.
`daily; intravenously 500 mg. to 2 g. daily.
`For methacycline the usual dose is 600 mg. of the
`hydrochloride salt or 560 mg. of methacycline base,
`daily in divided doses. When demeclocycline is utilized
`the usual dose is 600 mg. daily in 4 divided doses of 150
`mg. or 2 divided doses of 300 mg. each, and the usual
`dose range is from 150-900 mg. per day. Doxycycline is
`typically utilized in a dosage of 100 mg. every 12 hours
`during the first day of treatment followed by a mainte-
`nance dose of 100 mg. daily.
`The method of the present invention utilizes pharma-
`ceutical compositions which incorporate the particular
`tetracycline being utilized. For oral administration the
`tetracyclines utilized in this invention may be formu-
`lated in the form of tablets, capsules, elixirs or the like.
`For parenteral administration they may be formulated
`into solutions or suspensions or intramuscular injec-
`tions, or additionally, the tetracyclines of the present
`invention may be reasonably incorporated into a poly-
`mer carrier delivery system for use topically or locally,
`specifically in cases of periodontal diseases or to be
`delivered topically directly into the periodantat packet
`by some other technique (e.g. by the patient using the
`Water-Pik harne care device or by the dentist using an
`uhrasonie (cavitron) system. The dosage of tetracy-
`clines administered in the present invention is also addi-
`tionally dependent upon the age and weight of the ani-
`mal species being treated, the mode of administration,
`and the type and severity of the excess collagenase
`induced disease being treated.
`The following discussion describes in detail composi-
`tions and methods illustrative of the present invention.
`It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many
`modifications, both of materials and methods, may be
`practiced without departing from the purpose and in-
`tent of this disclosure.
`EXPERIMENT AL
`EXAMPLE I a)
`The reduction of collagenolytic enzyme(s) Activity in
`Test Animals
`(a) Conventional Rats
`Five month old (mean weight, 445g) male Sprague
`Dawley rats were made diabetic by I.V. injection of
`streptozotocin (70 mg/kg body weight), after a 12 hour
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`5
`fasting period, (as described by Golub, et al., Biochim.
`Biophys. Acta., 534, 73-81 (1978) and Golub, et al., In-
`feet. Immun., 37, 1013-1020 (1982). Age matched unin-
`jected rats served as controls. Some of the diabetic rats
`received the tetracycline, minocycline (20 mg. Mino-
`cin ® per day; Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River,
`N.Y.), by gavage on a daily basis beginning 3 days after
`diabetes is induced. After a 25 day experimental period,
`blood samples were taken for glucose analysis, and
`subgingival plaque samples were taken for assessment of 10
`the microflora in the region (McNamara, et. al., Archs.
`Oral. Bio/., 27, 217-223 (1982)). The animals were then
`sacrificed, gingival samples were taken for tissue cul-
`ture and the jaw bones dissected. The results are set
`forth below and illustrated in FIG. I.
`To test the effect ofphysiologic Ievels ofminocycline
`(the concentration in human serum, during a therapeu-
`tic regimen, is approximately 2 ug/ml; that in the gingi-
`val crevicular fluid is 4-5 times greater; Ciancio, et. al.,
`1980, J. Periodontol., 51, 531-534) on mammalian collag- 20
`enolytic activity in vitro, peritonealexudate polymor-
`phomuclear leucocytes (PMNLs) were collected from
`15 mole (non-diabetic) rats 4 hours after I.P. injection of
`0.15% glycogen. An extract of PMNLs was prepared,
`250 fLI aliquots of this extract were incubated with 14C- 25
`glycine labeled collagen fibrils for 14 hours at 35" C. (in
`the presence or absence of minocycline, or EDT A, or
`additional CaCh), and collagenolytic activity was mea-
`sured as described by Nicoll, et al., (Experientia., 37,
`315-317).
`(b) Germ-free rats
`In a second separate procedure, germfree rats (pur-
`chased from Taconic Farms, Germantown, N.Y.), were
`maintained in inflatable vinyl isolators (Standard Safety
`Equipment Co., Palatine, Ill ), until a weight of 360 35
`g± 15 was reached. At this time (6 weeks after pur-
`chase), diabetes was induced in some of the animals, as
`described above in a), and the control and diabetic ani-
`mals maintained under germfree conditions for an addi-
`tional 6 weeks prior to sacrifice. Half of the diabetic 40
`animals
`received minocycline
`(Minocin @)
`(20
`mg/day) by gavage for the last 4 weeks of the protocol.
`Blood and tissues were then obtained to assess gingival
`collagenolytic enzyme activity and the Ioss of skin col-
`lagen and bone. The results are set forth below and 45
`illustrated in FIG. II.
`
`4,666,897
`6
`treated with minocycline was measured. The tech-
`niques used were those described by Schneir and
`Golub, (Streptozotocin: Fundamentals and Therapy (Ed.
`M. K. Agarwal, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomed Press,
`Chapter 12, pp 161-182, (1981)).
`The techniques used to measure the collagenolytic
`enzyme activity of gingival tissue in culture, and in
`polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMNLs), are those
`described by Golub, et. al., (J. Dent. Res., 57, 520-525
`(197)8) and Nicoll, et. al., (Experimentia, 37, 315-317,
`(1981)) with minor modifications.
`The conventional and germfree control rats were
`found to exhibit relatively low blood glucose concen-
`trations ranging from 85 to 186 mg% (mean=l41 mg
`15 %±14). As expected, the diabetic conventional and
`germfree rats, with or without minocycline therapy,
`exhibited severe hyperglycemia having blood glucose
`vales ranging from 310 to 832 mg%, with a mean of 503
`mg %±42. The germfree rats and isolators showed
`negative results for aerobic and anaerobic cultures
`throughout the experimental period, and treatment of
`the conventional diabetic rats with the tetracycline
`minocycline eliminated detectable signs of a Gram-neg-
`ative microflora in the gingival crevices.
`The gingiva from the conventional and germfree
`control rats produced minimal collagenolytic activity in
`tissue culture; less than 10% of the 14C-collagen fibrils
`were found to be degraded after 3 days in culture (see
`FIGS. Ia and Ila). In contrast, collagenolytic activity
`30 was markedly increased in gingiva from the diabetic
`rats, under both conventional (see FIG. Ia) and germ-
`free (see FIG. Ila) conditions. Administering the tetra-
`cycline minocycline orally on a daily basis reduced the
`gingival collagenolytic activity in both diabetic conven-
`tional and germfree rats by 62% and 70% respectively
`(see FIG. Ia and Ila).
`Diabetes in the conventional rats produced a slight,
`but significant, increase (p>0.05) in bone loss in the
`interproximal region, compared to controls; this effect
`was completely reversed by the tetracycline administra-
`tion (see FIG. Ib). The patterns of change on the lingual
`surfaces of the mandibles were similar; however, these
`effects arenot found tobe statistically significant. In the
`germfree rats, no differences in bone Ievels could be
`detected between the three groups (see FIG. Ilb), how-
`ever significant changes are seen in skin (see FIG. 111).
`Diabetes in the germ-free rats (6 weeks after inducing
`(c) Results
`diabetes with streptozotocin) resulted in a 48% reduc-
`tion inskincollagen content compared to the germ-free
`Alveolar bone Ioss was assessed in the right and left
`mandibles of both the conventional and germfree rats 50
`control rats (p > 0.01 ), and minocycline treatment of the
`germ-free diabetics increased the collagen Ievels in this
`(control and diabetic) using a modification of a previ-
`tissue by 45% (p>0.05). Similar patterns of change in
`ously described technique (Stralfors, et.al" Archs. Oral.
`skin collagen content were seen in conventional con-
`Bio/., 12, 1213-1216 (1967); Heijl, et. al., J. Periodonta/
`trol, conventional diabetic, and conventional minocy-
`Res., 15, 405-419 (1980)). The mandibles were defleshed
`(autoclaving followed by soaking in 2N NaOH for 2-3 55 cline-treated diabetic rats (see modified FIG. 111).
`The collagenolytic activity in the leucocyte (or
`h), dried, and the distance (expressed as units; I
`unit=0.05 mm) between the cementoenaniel junction
`PMNL) extract was completely inihibited by EDT A
`(CEJ) and the crest of the alveolar bone is measured in
`(mammalian collagenase is a calcium dependent neutral
`the long axis of the root surface at 10 specified sites on
`protease; (see Seilers and Murphy, Int. Rev. Conn. Tiss.
`lingual surfaces of the 3 molar teeth (see Crawford,
`60 Res., 9, 151-189 (1981)), and the collagensubstratewas
`et.al., J. Periodontal Res., 13, 316-325 (1978)) using an
`not susceptible to non-specific proteolysis by trypsin
`eye-piece micrometer in a dissecting microscope (20X
`(see Table 1). Minocycline, in concentrations approxi-
`magnification ).
`mately those found in human serum and gingival crevic-
`ular fluid (Ciancio, et. al., J. Periodonta/, 51, 531-534
`Because uncontrolled diabetes in the rat results in the
`massive resorption of skin collagen associated with
`65 (I 980)), produced almost complete inhibition of PMNL
`increased collagenase activity in this tissue, the collagen
`collagenase activity, an effect which was reversed by
`content of entire skins from the germfree and from the
`increasing concentrations of calcium (See Table 1).
`conventional control and diabetic rats, including those
`Two non-tetracycline antibiotics (penicillin - strepto-
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`6
`
`8.3
`
`38.5
`82.1
`90.3
`
`Conclusion
`Diabetes increased the collagenolytic enzyme activ-
`25 ity within the rat gingival tissue. Administering minocy-
`cline to the diabetic rats reduced the abnorrnally high
`Ievel of collagenolytic enzyme activity within the gingi-
`val tissue by 42.5, 72.7 and 77.2%, for rats that were
`diabetic and administered the drug for 15, 28 and 56
`30 days, respectively. (Again note that the drug did not
`TABLE 2
`reduce collagenase activity below normal Ievels). Also
`The Effect of Four Different Types of Tetracyclines
`note that the Ionger the duration of minocycline ther-
`on Rat PMNL Collagenolytic Activity in vitro
`apy, the greater the therapeutic effect in reducing the
`Collagenolytic Activity:
`Incubation
`collagenolytic activity.
`% 14c-collagen gel lyzed
`Mixture
`----------------------------~~~~---35
`EXAMPLE III
`PMNL extract•
`39.0
`PMNL extract + minocycline••
`4.0
`Human Gingival Crevicular Study
`PMNL extract + Achromycin..
`2.0
`PMNL extract + Terramycin••
`4.4
`(a) 19 year old males
`PMNL extract + Vibramycin••
`4.5
`40
`PMNL extract + ampicillin••
`35.7
`PMNL extract + Cefazolin••
`50.0
`_____ .,;_.;...._.....,._____________
`*Extract obtained from 30 X 10° PMNLs per ml.
`**All antibiotics were added to the reaction mixturein a final concentration or zo
`ug/ml; this Ievel or antibiotic approximates the concentration oF tetracycline Fa und
`in the periodantat pockets or humans treated with these drugs.
`
`4,666,897
`
`8
`diabetic (control) rats, and the diabetic rats, was incu-
`bated at 37" C. in vitro with radiolabeled collagen fibrils
`to assess collagenolytic ennzyme activity.
`
`Gingival
`Collagenolytic
`Activity
`(% ct 4-Collagen
`Degraded)
`9.1
`50.4
`
`% Inhibition of
`Collagenolytic
`Activity by
`Minocycline
`
`63.0
`
`47.8
`
`29.0
`
`17.2
`
`10.9
`
`42.5
`
`72.7
`
`77.2
`
`3
`4
`
`2.6
`88.7
`
`12.4
`
`7
`mycin) similarly tested were found to have no detect-
`able effect on collagenase (Table I).
`In a similar but separate experiment, the effect of four
`(4) different types oftetracyclines on PMNL collageno-
`lytic activity was tested (Table 2). All of the tetracy-
`clines inhibited this mammalian collagenolytic activity,
`whereas two additional non-tetracycline antibiotics
`(ampicillin and cefazolin) were again found to be inef-
`Experimental
`fective against this enzyrne(s).
`Group
`10 Control
`TABLE 1
`Diabetes-
`15 day duration
`The Effect of Minocycline on rat PMNL
`Diabetes _
`Collagenolytic Activity in vitro
`28 day duration
`Collagenolytic Activity:*
`Incubation
`Diabetes -
`% 14c-collagen gel lysed
`Mixture
`------------------...;;;.......;;;.......;;..._ 15 56 day duration
`PMNL extract ( control)**
`85.5
`I
`Diabetes+
`2
`PMNL extract +
`3.1
`Minocycline, 15 days
`EDTA (54 mM)
`Diabetes+
`Trypsin (I JJ.g)
`Minocycline, 28 days
`Bacterial
`Diabetes+
`collagenase (250 JJ.g)
`20 Minocycline, 56 days
`PMNL extract + Minocin
`(5 JJ.g/ml)
`PMNL extract + Minocin
`(20 JJ.g/ml)
`Above, (6.) + Caclz (10 mM)
`Above, (6.) + CaCiz (50 mM)
`Above, (!.) + Penicillin -
`Streptomycin (20 JJ.g/ml)
`*Each value is the mean or duplicate analysis arter background activity (3.5%) was
`subtracted.
`••Extract obtained from 38 X 106 cells/ml.
`
`Conclusion
`These results (FIGS. I-III and Tables 1-2) demon-
`strate that: (1) tetracyclines inhibit rnarnmalian collage-
`nolytic enzyme(s) activity and, as a result, inhibit the
`pathologic loss of collagen (e.g. skin & bone), and (2)
`tetracyclines have this therapeutic capability through a
`mechanism unrelated to the drug's antibacterial effi-
`cacy. Note that non-tetracycline antibiotics did not
`have this anti-collagenolytic capability.
`EXAMPLE II
`Effect of Minocycline Therapy on the Abnormally
`High Collagenolytic Enzyme Activity in Extracts of
`Gingiva from Diabetic Rats
`Rats were made diabetic chemically with the agent
`streptozotocin. Some of the diabetic rats (half were
`administered minocycline orally on a daily basis) were
`killed 15 days, or 28 days, or 56 days after inducing
`diabetes and the gingiva were dissected, the tissues were
`extracted, and the extracts partially purified by ammo-
`nium sulfate precipitation. The partially purified en-
`zyme preparation from the gingiva of a group of non-
`
`1. analysis
`h
`In a separate study involving umans, gingival cre-
`vicular fluid (GCF) samples were collected on filter
`paper strips inserted into 8 interproximal pockets of
`selected teeth in the maxillary arch of two 19 year-old
`45 twin brothers with juvenile-onset (insulin-dependent)
`diabetes mellitus. Fluid volume was immediately deter-
`mined on a modified Periotron (Model 6000, Harco
`Electronics Ltd., Winnipeg, Canada); then incubated
`with 10 JLI (3H-rnethyl) collagen (20,675 DPM) and 70
`50 JLI buffer (50 mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.8, containing 0.2 M
`sodium chloride and 5 mM calcium chloride). The GCF
`samples (or reagent blanks or trypsin controls) were
`incubated at 27" C. for 18 hours with gentle shaking.
`The reaction was stopped and undigested collagen pre-
`ss cipitated by adding 10 JLI 0.1 M phenanthroline in diox-
`ane/water (1:1, v/v), 10 JLI of nonradioactive methyl-
`ated carrier collagen (2 mg/ml) in 50 mM Tris-HCI
`buffer containing IM NaCI (pH 7.0), and 100 JLI diox-
`ane. After mixing, the radiolabeled collagen degrada-
`60 tion products were collected by filtration and counted
`in a liquid scintillation spectrorneter (Golub, et. al.,
`1976, J. Dent. Res., 55, 1049). Using this technique, the
`reaction blank (no enzyme or GCF added) released
`about 10% of the total substrate counts; 2-20 ng bacte-
`65 rial collagenase produced a linear increase in the release
`of radioactive counts from the 3H-collagen substrate
`(the 20 ng Ievel of enzyme degraded 60% of the colla-
`gen substrate); and 50 ng trypsin released Iess than I%
`
`Exh. 1050
`
`

`
`9
`of the counts above blank values. GCF collagenase
`activity was expressed as units of equivalent activity of
`vertebrate collagenase (obtained from New England
`Nuclear, Cat. No. NEK-016); 1 unit was operationally
`defined as the amount of enzyme that degrades 1 p,g of
`collagen per hour at 27' C.
`Four additional GCF samples were collected from
`other maxillary pockets of the same diabetic twin broth-
`ers on filter paper strips, their volume determined (see
`above), and collagenolytic activity assessed using the 10
`same procedure described above but with a different
`substrate (10 p,l of (3H-propionate) collagen, NET-660,
`New England Nuclear Corp., Boston, Mass., 302,000
`DPM).
`Half of the 12 GCF samples per subject were acti- 15
`vated by pretreatment with 1.04 uM trypsin followed
`by the addition of a 5-fold molar excess of soybean
`trypsin inhibitor. Sampies were selected to be treated or
`not treated with trypsin by matehing them for Gingival
`Index (Loe and Silness, Acta. Odont. Scand., 21, 533-551 20
`(1967)), GCF flow, and for packet depth; the clincal
`parameters (GI, PD) were measured immediately after
`GCF collection. All measurements were carried out
`immediately before antibiotic coverage and after 7 days
`of treatment with either pencillin G (lg. per day; patient 25
`P. D.) or the tetracycline minocycline (200 mg/day;
`patient K. D.).
`
`a ii) Treatment
`In the human study, the adolescent diabetic twin (K. 30
`D.) was treated with the tetracycline minocycline (See
`FIG. IV). Prior to treatment, he demonstrated a greater
`severity of gingival inflammation (a significantly higher
`G. I. and a tendency towards increased GCF flow) but
`similar packet depth compared to the other diabetic 35
`twin (P. D.) who in this study was treated with penicil-
`lin. Prior to antibiotic the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket