throbber
JEADV (2005) 19,273-285
`DOl: 10.1111/j.l468-3083.2005.01216.x
`
`Rosacea and its management: an overview
`
`AK Gupta,*t:t: MM Chaudhry:t:
`t Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Science Center (Sunnybrook site) and the University of
`Toronto, Toronto, Canada, :j:Mediprobe Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada, *Corresponding author: 645 Windermere Road, London, Ontario,
`Canada N5X 2P1, tel. (519) 657-4222; fax (519) 657-4233; E-mail: agupta@execulink.com
`
`ABSTRACT
`Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects 10% of the population. The prevalence
`of rosacea is highest among fair-skinned individuals, particularly those of Celtic and northern European
`descent. Since a cure for rosacea does not yet exist, management and treatment regimens are designed to
`suppress the inflammatory lesions, erythema, and to a lesser extent, the telangiectasia involved with rosacea.
`Objectives This review outlines the treatment options that are available to patients with rosacea.
`Methods Published literature involving the treatment or management of rosacea was examined and summarized.
`Results Patients who find that they blush and flush frequently, or have a family history of rosacea are
`advised to avoid the physiological and environmental stimuli that can cause increased facial redness. Topical
`agents such as metronidazole, azelaic acid cream or sulfur preparations are effective in managing rosacea.
`Patients who have progressed to erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular rosacea may benefit from the
`use of an oral antibiotic, such as tetracycline, and in severe or recalcitrant cases, isotretinoin to bring the
`rosacea flare-up under control. Treatment with a topical agent, such as metronidazole, may help maintain
`remission. Patients with ocular involvement may benefit from a long-term course of an antibiotic and the
`use of metronidazole gel. A surgical alternative, laser therapy, is recommended for the treatment of tel-
`angiectasias and rhinophyma. Patients with distraught feelings due to their rosacea may consider cosmetic
`camouflage to cover the signs of rosacea.
`Conclusions With the wide variety of oral and topical agents available for the effective management of
`rosacea, patients no longer need to feel self-conscious because of their disorder.
`Key words: azelaic acid, isotretinoin, management, metronidazole, rosacea, tetracycline
`
`Received: 17 September 2003, accepted: 13 April2004
`
`Background
`Rosacea is a chronic disorder, involving the mid facial region,
`and occasionally the neck and scalp and eyes,! It may progress
`from inflammatory lesions and/or erythema, to telangiectasia
`and rhinophyma, and sometimes also cause ocular involve-
`ment. The prevalence of rosacea is highest among fair-skinned
`individuals, especially those of Celtic and northern and eastern
`European heritage.2 The onset of rosacea is usually between
`the ages of 20 and 50 years, with females more often affected
`than males; however, males more frequently progress to the end-
`stages of severe rosacea. Rosacea has been described as having
`four subtypes, erythematotelangiectatic rosacea, papulopustular
`rosacea, phymatous rosacea, and ocular rosacea, with one
`variant, granulomatous rosacea.3
`
`© 2005 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
`
`Presently there is no cure for rosacea; management and treat-
`ment may provide only a method of suppressing its signs and
`symptoms. The choice of treatment is dependent primarily on
`the severity of the disorder and ranges from avoiding the factors
`that can trigger a flare-up, to the use of surgery for correcting
`the hypertrophied soft tissue of the nose (rhinophyma). This
`paper will discuss the treatment options rosacea patients have
`for managing their disorder.
`
`Pre-rosacea (episodic erythema)
`
`Avoidance policy
`The earliest manifestation of rosacea includes frequent flushing
`and blushing, or episodic erythema. Patients, who experience
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al.
`v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1044
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REV IEW AR TICLE
`
`19, 273–285
`
`JEADV (2005)
`
`DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2005.01216.x
`
`Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
`
`Rosacea and its management: an overview
`
`AK Gupta,*†‡ MM Chaudhry‡
`
`†Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Science Center (Sunnybrook site) and the University of
`Toronto, Toronto, Canada,
`
`‡Mediprobe Research Inc., London, Ontario, Canada,
`
`*Corresponding author: 645 Windermere Road, London, Ontario,
`Canada N5X 2P1, tel. (519) 657-4222; fax (519) 657-4233; E-mail: agupta@execulink.com
`
`ABSTRACT
`Background
`Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects 10% of the population. The prevalence
`of rosacea is highest among fair-skinned individuals, particularly those of Celtic and northern European
`descent. Since a cure for rosacea does not yet exist, management and treatment regimens are designed to
`suppress the inflammatory lesions, erythema, and to a lesser extent, the telangiectasia involved with rosacea.
`Objectives
`This review outlines the treatment options that are available to patients with rosacea.
`Methods
`Published literature involving the treatment or management of rosacea was examined and summarized.
`Results
`Patients who find that they blush and flush frequently, or have a family history of rosacea are
`advised to avoid the physiological and environmental stimuli that can cause increased facial redness. Topical
`agents such as metronidazole, azelaic acid cream or sulfur preparations are effective in managing rosacea.
`Patients who have progressed to erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular rosacea may benefit from the
`use of an oral antibiotic, such as tetracycline, and in severe or recalcitrant cases, isotretinoin to bring the
`rosacea flare-up under control. Treatment with a topical agent, such as metronidazole, may help maintain
`remission. Patients with ocular involvement may benefit from a long-term course of an antibiotic and the
`use of metronidazole gel. A surgical alternative, laser therapy, is recommended for the treatment of tel-
`angiectasias and rhinophyma. Patients with distraught feelings due to their rosacea may consider cosmetic
`camouflage to cover the signs of rosacea.
`Conclusions
`With the wide variety of oral and topical agents available for the effective management of
`rosacea, patients no longer need to feel self-conscious because of their disorder.
`Key words:
`azelaic acid, isotretinoin, management, metronidazole, rosacea, tetracycline
`
`Received: 17 September 2003, accepted: 13 April 2004
`
`Background
`Rosacea is a chronic disorder, involving the mid facial region,
`and occasionally the neck and scalp and eyes.
` It may progress
`1
`from inflammatory lesions and/or erythema, to telangiectasia
`and rhinophyma, and sometimes also cause ocular involve-
`ment. The prevalence of rosacea is highest among fair-skinned
`individuals, especially those of Celtic and northern and eastern
`European heritage.
` The onset of rosacea is usually between
`2
`the ages of 20 and 50 years, with females more often affected
`than males; however, males more frequently progress to the end-
`stages of severe rosacea. Rosacea has been described as having
`four subtypes, erythematotelangiectatic rosacea, papulopustular
`rosacea, phymatous rosacea, and ocular rosacea, with one
`variant, granulomatous rosacea.
`3
`
`Presently there is no cure for rosacea; management and treat-
`ment may provide only a method of suppressing its signs and
`symptoms. The choice of treatment is dependent primarily on
`the severity of the disorder and ranges from avoiding the factors
`that can trigger a flare-up, to the use of surgery for correcting
`the hypertrophied soft tissue of the nose (rhinophyma). This
`paper will discuss the treatment options rosacea patients have
`for managing their disorder.
`
`Pre-rosacea (episodic erythema)
`
`Avoidance policy
`
`The earliest manifestation of rosacea includes frequent flushing
`and blushing, or episodic erythema. Patients, who experience
`
`© 2005 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
`
`273
`
`Exh. 1044
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`274
`
`Gupta and Chaudhry
`
`Table 1 Rosacea trigger factors and management techniques
`
`Rosacea triggering factors
`
`Management factors
`
`Foods:
`Meat: liver
`Dairy products: yogurt, sour cream, cheeses (not including cottage cheese)
`Vegetables: eggplant, tomatoes, spinach, lima and navy beans, peas
`Fruits: avocados, bananas, red plums, raisins, figs, and citrus fruits
`Condiments/flavoring: chocolate and vanilla, soy sauce and vinegars
`Other: hot and spicy foods, yeast extraction
`
`Beverages:
`Alcohol and hot beverages
`
`Emotional:
`Stress and anxiety
`
`Weather:
`Sun, strong winds, cold, humidity
`
`Temperature:
`Any hot environment: saunas, hot baths, simple overheating
`
`Skin Care Products:
`Cosmetics and hairsprays especially those containing alcohol, witch hazel or fragrances
`Hydro-alcoholic or acetone substances
`Any substance that causes redness or stinging
`
`Medications:
`Vasodilators, and topical steroids
`
`Medical Conditions:
`Menopause, caffeine withdrawal syndrome, chronic cough,
`frequent flushing
`
`Physical Exertion:
`Exercise, heavy lifting
`
`Identify and avoid any foods that aggravate the condition
`
`Avoid alcoholic beverages, especially red wine, beer,
`bourbon, gin, vodka or champagne
`Avoid hot drinks, e.g. Tea, coffee, hot cider or hot chocolate
`
`Practice stress management techniques, e.g. Yoga or
`breathing exercises
`
`Use ski masks, scarves to protect from cold and windy
`conditions
`Use sunscreens (min. SPF 15)
`
`Avoid any hot or humid environment
`
`Resist using skin products that are listed as irritating
`
`If avoidance is not possible, they should not be taken for
`long periods of time
`
`Not avoidable; however, avoiding other factors minimizes
`these conditions
`
`Avoid long strenuous exercising and heavy lifting
`Use cool-down techniques: chewing on ice, or covering face
`with cool cloth after the workout
`
`frequent blushing, have a family history of rosacea, or both may
`be entering prerosacea; these patients are advised to consider
`changing their lifestyle to control their blushing. The best
`approach to preventing the blushing and flushing associ-
`ated with the stages of rosacea is the avoidance policy,
`4
`where nonspecific physiological and environmental stimuli are
`avoided, and thus increased facial redness is lessened. One study
`reported 78% of rosacea patients felt that avoiding the factors
`that aggravate their rosacea was effective or at least somewhat
`effective in controlling their condition.
` The most common
`5
`triggers of blushing include alcohol ingestion, spicy food, sun
`exposure, or stress. However, the causes may vary from patient
`to patient, and therefore it is important for a patient to avoid
`these causative agents as much as possible during their daily
`routine. Physicians of rosacea patients must be aware that
`rosacea is a recognized and controllable disorder; they should
`educate and monitor their patients for possible triggers and try
`to establish an individual risk factor profile.
` Table 1 outlines
`6
`
`some common factors that may trigger and aggravate rosacea
`flare-ups.
`
`Drug therapy
`
`Drug treatment trials for decreasing the flushing associated
`with rosacea have primarily been unsuccessful. Two drugs,
`clonidine and nadolol have been tried against rosacea flushing;
`neither was effective. One study demonstrated that twice-daily
`treatment with clonidine hydrochloride, 0.05 mg, taken for 2
`weeks was unable to suppress the flushing reactions provoked

`with hot water (60
`C), red wine and chocolate in 23 of 24
`patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.
` Similarly,
`7
`treatment with 40 mg of nadolol once or twice daily had no

`apparent effect on flushing induced by hot water (60
`C), ethanol,
`and niacin in 15 patients with erythematous telangiectatic
`rosacea.
` However, one double-blind study showed that
`8
`10-minute pretreatment with naloxone 0.8 mg in 2 mL saline
`
`© 2005 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JEADV (2005) 19, 273–285
`
`Exh. 1044
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`injected subcutaneously completely inhibited alcohol induced
`facial flushing in all five subjects.
` The mean forehead skin
`9


`temperature increased by 1.1
` 0.6
`C during flushing


`after saline administration, but by only 0.4
` 0.2
`C after
`naloxone administration. Currently, there are no effective
`long-term drug therapies to control the flushing associated
`with rosacea.
`
`Erythematotelangiectatic and
`papulopustular rosacea
`Rosacea is a progressive disorder, and although not all pati-
`ents necessarily pass through all stages, early diagnosis and
`management will prevent or lessen the chances that the rosacea
`will worsen. A variety of oral and topical treatments, with the
`ability of suppressing the disorder, are available for patients
`suffering with rosacea.
`
`Systemic therapy
`
`Several oral agents have been used in the treatment of rosacea.
`Table 2 summarizes the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of
`these systemic drugs.
`
`Oral antibiotics
`
`Oral antibiotics have long been accepted as safe and effective
`treatments for rosacea, and are thought to exert their
`therapeutic effects primarily via anti-inflammatory rather than
`antibacterial methods. Antibiotic therapy is most effective
`against inflammatory papules and pustules, with minimal
`effects on erythema and telangiectasia.
`26
`Tetracycline has historically been the antibiotic of choice for
`treating rosacea, as it has been shown to be successful in reduc-
`ing the number of papules and pustules. High doses are initially
`recommended until the disorder is brought under control,
`and then lower doses are used to maintain control. Total daily
`doses of up to 1000 mg, taken two to four times a day are
`recommended for up to 4 weeks, and then reduced by half for
`an additional 5 months.
`Tetracycline has proven to be successful in treating patients
`diagnosed with rosacea. In one randomized, double-blind
`study, 78% of patients treated with tetracycline 250 mg twice
`daily for 1 month experienced the disappearance of pustules,
`the flattening of papules and the diminution of erythema.
` In
`11
`another randomized, double-blind clinical trial, compared with
`ampicillin, tetracycline 250 mg taken three times daily for the
`first week and then twice daily for the subsequent 5 weeks, did
`not significantly differ in the reduction of papules and pustules;
`however, post-treatment evaluation revealed that both treat-
`ments were effective in decreasing the mean number of papules
`and pustules in comparison with the pretreatment means
`
`P < 0.05).
`(
`12
`
`Management of rosacea
`
`275
`
`The effects of doxycycline, 100 mg twice daily for 4 weeks,
`then once daily for another 4 weeks were compared with clari-
`thromycin, 250 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, then once daily for
`another 4 weeks in patients with mild and moderate rosacea.
`13
`The overall results of the treatment provide evidence of a higher
`clarithromycin efficacy profile in comparison with doxycycline.
`Significant differences were seen in erythema in favour of the
`
`
`clarithromycin group at weeks 4 and 6 (P < 0.05); however,
`after 8 weeks of treatment, no significant differences were seen
`in erythema. A significant difference between the mean values
`of the numbers and dimensions of telangiectasia in the two
`groups of patients was observed after 4 weeks of treatment.
`After 6 and 8 weeks of treatment, there were no significant dif-
`ferences between the two groups. A significantly faster decrease
`
`P < 0.0005) of the mean number of papules and pustules was
`(
`observed in the clarithromycin-treated patients, when com-
`pared with the doxycycline-treated patients after 4 and 6 weeks
`of therapy; however, after 8 weeks there was no significant dif-
`ference in these two parameters between the two groups.
`Treatment with antibiotics must be long-term, lasting a
`minimum of 6 months. Treatment failure with antibiotics is most
`commonly the result of patient noncompliance, particularly
`resulting from side-effects including nausea, and also because
`some antibiotics, such as tetracycline must been taken on an
`empty stomach; food and milk restrict its absorption.
`
`Oral metronidazole
`
`Oral metronidazole is a treatment alternative for rosacea
`patients who do not respond well to tetracycline. Two double-
`blind, randomized controlled trials assessed the efficacy of oral
`metronidazole.
` Metronidazole 200 mg, taken twice daily for
`14,15
`12 weeks proved to be as effective as oxytetracycline 250 mg
`taken twice daily in improving the papulo-pustules related to
`rosacea.
` In addition, 6 weeks of therapy with metronidazole
`14
`200 mg taken twice daily in combination with 1% hydrocortisone,
`applied twice daily produced ‘definite improvement’ in the overall
`clinical severity of the rosacea condition in 10 of 14 patients.
`15
`
`Isotretinoin
`
`Another effective therapy in the treatment of rosacea is
`isotretinoin. However, this treatment is suggested for patients
`with severe or recalcitrant rosacea. Patients may benefit from
`a trial with systemic tetracycline, metronidazole or topical
`metronidazole before the use of isotretinoin. Daily doses of
`isotretinoin usually range from 0.5 mg/kg to 1.0 mg/kg. The
`advantage of isotretinoin is that it has an immediate effect on
`papules and pustules. Four studies have shown isotretinoin to
`significantly decrease the mean number of papules and pustules
`compared to baseline
` within as little as 1 month of
`17–20
` Isotretinoin also produces considerable improve-
`therapy.
`18
`ment in erythema,
` however, the effects may be slow and
`17,20
`
`© 2005 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JEADV (2005) 19, 273–285
`
`Exh. 1044
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`276
`
`Gupta and Chaudhry
`
`Erythema
`
`Telangiectasia
`
`Physician
`assessment
`
`Patient
`assessment
`
`No significant
`difference
`
`No significant difference
`
`Improvement in
`clindamycin: 94.7%
`of patients
`tetracycline:
`94.4% of patients
`
`Improvement seen in
`81.8% of patients
`treated with
`clindamycin and
`90.5% of tetracycline
`
`Other
`
`N/A
`
`Reference
`
`Wilkin 1993
`10
`
`Table 2
`
`Systemic therapies used in the treatment of rosacea
`
`Study design
`
`Regimen
`
`DB, R 1% clindamycin
`phosphate lotion vs.
`oral tetracycline
`=
`
`N
` 43; 12 weeks
`
`1% clindamycin lotion
`+
` placebo or
`b.i.d.
`250 mg tetracycline q.i.d.
`+
` placebo lotion for
`9 weeks
`
`Efficacy parameters
`Inflammatory
`lesions
`
`Clindamycin: facial
`lesions decreased
`from baseline
`<
`(
`
`P
` 0.05)
`tetracycline: facial
`lesions decreased
`from baseline
`<
`(
`
`P
` 0.05)
`
`DB, R Tetracycline vs.
`=
`placebo
`
`N
` 78;
`4 weeks
`
`Tetracycline 250 mg
`b.i.d. or placebo tablets
`b.i.d. for 4 weeks
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Sneddon 1966
`11
`
`Improvement in
`disappearance of
`pustules, flattening of
`papules, and diminution
`of erythema:
`Tetracycline: 78%
`Placebo: 45%
`
`DB, R Tetracycline vs.
`=
`ampicillin
`
`N
` 56;
`6 weeks
`
`t.i.d. for the first week
`then b.i.d. for 5 weeks
`
`Tetracycline:
`decreased from
`21.05 to 4.6
`ampicillin:
`decreased from
`21.06 to 9.53
`
`No significant
`difference
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Ampicillin marginally
`better than tetracycline
`
`N/A
`
`Marks 1971
`12
`
`Clarithromycin
`=
`vs.doxycycline
`N
`
` 40;
`8 weeks
`
`Clarithromycin 250 mg
`b.i.d. for 4 weeks then
`q.i.d. for 4 weeks or
`doxycycline 100 mg b.i.d.
`for 4 weeks then q.i.d.
`for 4 weeks
`
`No significant
`difference between
`treatments after
`8 weeks
`
`No significant
`difference between
`treatments after
`8 weeks
`
`No significant difference
`between treatments after
`8 weeks
`
`No significant
`difference between
`treatments after
`8 weeks
`
`N/A
`
`Torresani 1997
`13
`
`DB, R Metronidazole
`vs. oxytetracycline
`=
`
`N
` 38; 12 weeks
`
`Metronidazole 200 mg
`b.i.d. or oxytetracycline
`250 mg b.i.d. 12 weeks
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`DB, R Metronidazole
`=
`vs. placebo
`
`N
` 27;
`6 weeks
`
`Metronidazole 200 mg
`+
`1%
`b.i.d.
`hydrocortisone cream
`+
`daily or placebo
`1%
`hydrocortisone for
`6 weeks
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Saihan 1980
`14
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Pye 1976
`15
`
`Mean independent
`opinion of patient
`and 2 doctors
`No significant
`difference between
`groups; both
`improved from
`<
`baseline (
`
`P
` 0.05)
`
`10 patients in
`metronidazole and 2
`patients in placebo
`group showed good
`<
`results (
`
`P
` 0.02)
`
`© 2005 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
`
`JEADV
`
` (2005)
`
`19
`
`, 273–285
`
`Exh. 1044
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Management of rosacea
`
`277
`
`Efficacy parameters
`Inflammatory
`lesions
`
`All groups showed
`significant difference
`from baseline
`<
`(
`
`P
` 0.01)
`
`Erythema
`
`Telangiectasia
`
`Physician
`assessment
`
`Patient
`assessment
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Group 1: 41%
`reduction Group 2:
`27% reduction
`Group 3: 40%
`reduction
`
`Other
`
`N/A
`
`Reference
`
`Ertle 1994
`16
`
`Table 2 Continued
`
`Study design
`
`Regimen
`
`DB, R Isotretinoin vs.
`tretinoin cream vs.
`=
`combo
`
`N
` 20;
`32 weeks
`
`Group 1: isotretinoin 10
`+
` placebo cream for
`mg/d
`16 weeks then placebo
`cream for 16 weeks or
`Group 2: 0.025% tretinoin
`+
`cream
` placebo tablets
`for 16 weeks then tretinoin
`cream for 16 weeks or
`Group 3: combo
`(isotretinoin and tretinoin)
`+
` placebo tablets for
`16 weeks then tretinoin
`cream for 16 weeks
`
`Open label isotretinoin
`=
`
`N
` 92; 20 weeks
`
`Isotretinoin 0.5 mg/kg/
`bw
`
`Mean papules
`decreased from 42
`to 5 mean pustules
`decreased from 11 to
`0.6
`
`Improved
`considerably
`
`Improved considerably
`
`Number of patients
`with good or very
`good response: 64
`
`Number of patients
`fully or partially
`satisfied: 64
`
`Edema improved
`considerably
`
`Hoting 1986
`17
`
`Open label isotretinoin
`=
`
`N
` 20; 6 months
`
`Isotretinoin 0.5 mg/kg or
`1.0 mg/kg for 3 months
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Open label isotretinoin
`=
`
`N
` 7; 20 weeks
`
`Isotretinoin 1.0 mg/kg/bw
`for 12 weeks
`
`Facial lesions
`decreased from 39.7
`to 4 at 6 weeks
`<
`(
`
`P
` 0.001) and rose
`to 10.6 at week 20
`
`N/A
`
`Measured by
`reflectometer.
`Decreased from
`10.8 units to 10.1
`units at 12 weeks
`then to 9.1 at week
`20
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Turjanmaa 1987
`18
`
`Total clinical score
`(includes papules,
`pustules, erythema and
`oiliness): decreased from
`<
`7.5 to 1.25 (
`
`P
` 0.001)
`
`N/A
`
`Marsden 1984
`19
`
`Open label isotretinoin
`=
`
`N
` 18; 16 weeks
`
`Isotretinoin 1.0 mg/kg/bw
`for 16 weeks
`
`Significantly
`decreased from 8.86
`<
`to 2.55 (
`
`P
` 0.001)
`
`Significantly
`decreased
`<
`
`P
` 0.001)
`(
`
`Significantly decreased
`<
`
`P
` 0.001)
`(
`
`Erdogan 1998
`20
`
`DB, R Lemecycline vs.
`
`N = 37;
`sulphur
`4 weeks
`
`Lymecycline 150 mg 2
`capsules b.i.d. for 1 week
`then 1 capsule b.i.d. for 3
`weeks + placebo cream
`or 10% sulphur cream
`q.i.d. + placebo capsules
`for 4 weeks
`
`Sulphur: number
`decreased from 213
`to 17; Lymecycline:
`number decreased
`from 143 to 131
`
`No significant
`difference
`
`No significant difference No significant
`difference
`
`No significant
`difference
`
`N/A
`
`Blom 198421
`
`© 2005 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
`
`JEADV
`
` (2005)
`
`19
`
`, 273–285
`
`Exh. 1044
`
`

`
`278 Gupta and Chaudhry
`
`Erythema
`
`Telangiectasia
`
`Physician
`assessment
`
`Patient
`assessment
`
`N/A
`
`Metronidazole:
`decreased from 2.5
`to 1.1
`Oxytetracycline:
`decreased from 2.4
`to 1.1; No
`significant
`difference
`
`Definite improvement
`in 75% of
`metronidazole treated
`patients and 80% of
`oxytetracycline
`treated patients
`
`Definite improvement
`in 67% of
`metronidazole treated
`patients and 80% of
`oxytetracycline treated
`patients
`
`Other
`
`N/A
`
`Reference
`
`Monk 199122
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Weien 198623
`
`Significant
`reduction from
`baseline. No
`significant
`difference between
`treatments
`
`Reduction from
`baseline;
`No significant
`difference between
`groups
`
`Number and extent of
`telangiectasia remained
`unchanged;
`No significant difference
`
`Improved patients:
`metronidazole: 96%
`oxytetracycline: 96%;
`No significant
`difference
`
`Improved patients:
`metronidazole: 88%
`oxytetracycline: 91%;
`No significant
`difference
`
`Nielson 198324
`
`Photographic
`evaluation Improved
`patients:
`metronidazole:
`84% oxytetracycline:
`91%; No significant
`difference
`
`No differences in
`degree of erythema
`compared to
`baseline
`
`No differences noted in
`degree of telangiectasia
`compared to baseline
`
`N/A
`
`Both groups showed
`much improvement
`
`N/A
`
`Schachter 199125
`
`Table 2 Continued
`
`Study design
`
`Regimen
`
`DB, R Oxytetracycline
`vs. metronidazole
`N = 27; 9 weeks
`
`Oxytetracycline 250 mg
`bid + placebo cream vs.
`Metronidazole 0.75% gel
`b.i.d. + placebo tablets
`for 9 weeks
`
`DB, R Tetracycline vs.
`metronidazole N = 75;
`8 weeks
`
`Tetracycline 250 mg
`b.i.d. + placebo cream or
`Metronidazole 1% cream
`q.i.d. for 8 weeks
`
`DB, R Oxytetracycline
`vs. metronidazole
`N = 48; 2 months
`
`Oxytetracycline 250 mg
`b.i.d. + placebo cream or
`metronidazole 1% cream
`q.i.d. + placebo tablets
`for 2 months
`
`DB, R Tetracycline vs.
`metronidazole
`N = 101; 2 months
`
`Tetracycline 250 mg t.i.d.
`+ placebo cream or
`Metronidazole 1% cream
`q.i.d. for 2 months
`
`Efficacy parameters
`Inflammatory
`lesions
`
`Facial lesions
`decreased 100% in
`75% of the
`Metronidazole-
`treated patients and
`in 66% of
`oxytetracycline-
`treated patients; No
`significant
`difference
`
`Significantly more
`patients treated with
`tetracycline obtained
`100% reduction of
`papules and
`pustules; No
`significant difference
`between treatments
`
`Reduction from
`baseline; No
`significant difference
`between groups
`
`Significantly fewer
`number of papules
`and pustules from
`baseline (P < 0.05)
`papule decrease:
`metronidazole: 68%
`tetracycline: 77%
`pustule decrease:
`metronidazole: 68%
`tetracycline: 77%
`
`q.i.d., once daily; b.i.d., twice daily; t.i.d., thrice daily; DB, double-blind; R, random; N, number of patient.
`
`© 2005 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology JEADV (2005) 19, 273–285
`
`Exh. 1044
`
`

`
`incomplete.18 In addition, patients may remain in remission
`for at least 1 year after discontinuing treatment.18
`One study performed ophthalmologic examinations in patients
`taking isotretinoin.17 Blepharitis and conjunctivitis, which are
`quite common symptoms in patients with rosacea, were present
`in 23 of 88 and 33 of 88 subjects, respectively, which decreased,
`respectively, to 17 of 54 and 25 of 54 subjects at week 20.
`Although isotretinoin has been demonstrated to be effective
`in treating the papules and pustules associated with rosacea,
`considerable drug intolerance is seen. The most common side-
`effects that occur with isotretinoin are mucosal, such as dryness
`of the lips and nose. Other side-effects that may be seen are
`cheilitis, dermatitis, musculoskeletal pain, tinnitus, headache,
`and an increase in triglyceride levels. The number and extent of
`these side-effects may be the limiting factors to this form of
`therapy for rosacea treatment.
`
`Topical treatments
`
`Metronidazole 1% cream, Metronidazole 0.75% gel,
`lotion and cream
`
`Topical metronidazole, available either as a gel or a cream, is the
`most popular topical agent for treating rosacea. Metronidazole
`0.75% gel22,27–29 and metronidazole 1% cream,14,23,25,30–37
`metronidazole 0.75% cream35,38 and metronidazole lotion39
`have been shown to be effective in treating rosacea when applied
`once or twice daily for 8–12 weeks. The results of these studies
`have demonstrated that both preparations significantly decrease
`the number of inflammatory lesions and reduce the erythema
`associated with rosacea. In addition, neither the cream nor
`the gel seemed to have an effect on the telangiectasia. How-
`ever, Tan 2001,36 reported that metronidazole 1% cream with
`sunscreen SPF 15 significantly decreased facial telangiectasia
`(P = 0.043).
`Studies that have compared 1% metronidazole cream with
`tetracycline have found that although the end result shows no
`significant difference between topical metronidazole and tetra-
`cycline, tetracycline does have a faster onset than metronida-
`zole.23–25 In addition, other studies have shown that following
`tetracycline withdrawal, the relapse rate is high. These findings
`suggest that the use of a topical agent following systemic therapy
`might be beneficial in preventing relapse after the oral agent is
`discontinued.
`
`Other topical therapies
`
`As a result of the positive effects of topical metronidazole,
`several other studies have evaluated the outcome of other
`topical agents in treating rosacea. Topical alternatives to
`metronidazole include: 1% clindamycin phosphate lotion,10
`topical tretinoin,16 and 5% permethrin cream.40,41 The effective-
`ness of these topical agents has been compared to proven,
`
`Management of rosacea 279
`
`successful systemic and topical therapies. When 1% topical
`clindamycin phosphate lotion was compared with tetracycline,10
`clindamycin phosphate reduced the mean number of pustules,
`papules, and nodules while tetracycline significantly reduced
`only papule and nodule counts from baseline. Comparison
`of topical tretinoin with isotretinoin16 revealed that both
`treatments were effective in decreasing the number of papules,
`pustules and erythema after 16 weeks of treatment, with no
`significant difference between the two treatment groups in
`papules and pustules. The results of 5% permethrin cream
`compared to 0.75% metronidazole gel showed that both
`treatments produced gradual improvement in erythema and
`papules.40,41
`The efficacy of two other topical preparations, sodium sul-
`facetamide 10%/sulphur 5% lotion42,43 and 10% sulphur cream21
`were also evaluated in the treatment of rosacea. Both pre-
`parations proved to be effective in decreasing the number of
`papules and pustules in patients. The sodium sulfacetamide
`10%/sulphur 5% lotion demonstrated significant reduction
`in erythema.42,43
`Another topical agent, 0.05% retinaldehyde cream was found
`to have beneficial effects on the vascular component of rosa-
`cea.44 In an open-labelled study, 23 females with rosacea applied
`retinaldehyde 0.05% once daily for 6 months. Clinical response
`was obtained in approximately 75% of patients with erythema
`after 5 months of treatment (P < 0.05).
`The antimicrobial, comedolytic and anti-inflammatory
`activity of azelaic acid 20% cream has been shown to be benefi-
`cial in the treatment of rosacea. Two studies that evaluated the
`efficacy and safety of azelaic acid 20% cream recorded that this
`agent produced significantly greater mean reductions in the
`number of papules, pustules and erythema than vehicle.45,46
`Following twice-daily application of azelaic acid 20% cream,
`the mean number of papules and pustules decreased from 14.2
`to 2.5 after 9 weeks of treatment,45 and from 30.8 to 8.3 after
`3 months of treatment.46 Furthermore, Carmichael45 found the
`erythema index decreased from 539.6 ± 13.4 to 500.6 ± 14.7
`after 9 weeks of treatment. Bjerke46 found the erythema severity
`score reduced by 47.9%. In addition, another study found
`twice-daily applications of azelaic acid 20% cream to be equi-
`valent to twice-daily applications of metronidazole 0.75% cream
`in the treatment of inflammatory lesions, with no significant
`difference in efficacy between the two groups.38
`In addition to the azelaic acid cream treatments, recently,
`there has been investigation into a lower concentration (15%)
`azelaic acid gel (AzA gel) as a new treatment for papulopustular
`rosacea through two vehicle-controlled, randomized studies.47
`The study found that the AzA gel group yielded a statistically
`significantly higher reduction in mean inflammatory lesion
`count than its vehicle in both study 1 (P = 0.0001) and study 2
`(P = 0.0208), with a reduction in 58% and 51%, respectively.
`This study also found that a significantly higher proportion of
`patients treated with AzA gel experienced improvement in
`
`© 2005 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology JEADV (2005) 19, 273–285
`
`Exh. 1044
`
`

`
`280 Gupta and Chaudhry
`
`erythema when compared with the vehicle. In study 1, improve-
`ment of erythema severity was seen in 44% of patients in the
`AzA group, compared to only 29% of the vehicle group
`(P = 0.0017). Study 2, showed improvement in 46% of patients,
`while only 28% of the vehicle group improved (P = 0.0005).
`Furthermore, the study found that there were no serious treatment-
`related adverse events, and the final conclusion of the investig-
`ators was that AzA gel, used twice daily, is an efficacious, safe, and
`well-tolerated topical treatment for moderate, papulopustular
`rosacea.47
`All these topical preparations have demonstrated efficacy in
`the treatment of papules, pustules and to a certain exte

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket