throbber
v.
`Galderma Laboratories, Inc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1019
`
`Exh. 1019
`
`

`
`·~022-202Xi78/0070-0001$02.00/0
`1
`HE JouRNAL
`Copyr·ight © OF NV~~TIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 70:51- 55, 1978
`1978 by lhe W!lhams & Wi lkins Co.
`
`Vol. 70, No. 1
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`THE EFFECT OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS ON LEUKOCYTE
`CHEMOTAXIS
`NANCY B. EsTERLY , M.D., NANCY L . FuREY, M.D., AND LrLLIAN E . FLANAGAN, B.S.
`Division of Dermatology, Department o(Pediatrics, Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center, Chicagu, lllinois, and
`Department oj"Derm.atology, Northwestem Uniuersity Seiwal o/ Medicine,
`Chicago, lllinois, U .S .A.
`
`.
`'l'h
`e effects of several chemothcmpeutic agents on thc
`h
`c emoh ·
`fh
`• XIS o
`uman leukocytes were studied in an in vitro
`S
`system u ·
`t , ·h
`.
`smg a ykes-Moo•·c chamber and a doublc-filtcr
`. ect. mque. Chemotactic factor was genemted by the inter-
`1
`ac •on of
`t'
`norma human scrum and zymosan. At concentra-
`t iotns comparablc to and bclow therapeutic blood Ieveis,
`e •·acy r
`H
`Were alc 1.nc . ~1, e~·ythr~mycin base and clin~amycin HCI
`I lflhibJtory, causmg marked suppresswn of leuko-
`d 1· h
`cyte chemotax· ·
`d



`t'
`IS an s 1g t re uctwn of random m1g1·a 1011.
`. . .
`p
`w~~:cllhn G-Na, dapsone, and sulfapyridine did not alter
`. . 1 e cell motility at thc concentrations of dmg tested. 1t
`;s :o~tulated that the Capacity of somc of these agents to
`thn ~bJtf ~eukocyte chemotaxis may account, in part, for
`e1r e flca

`· 1
`.
`cy lfl mf ammatory skin diseases such as acnc
`vulgans.
`
`an in vitro system, using concentrations of a ntibiotics below,
`within, and a bove the range oftherapeutic semm Ievels. Also
`included in these assays are two chemotherapeutic agents
`(dapsone a nd sulfapyridine) that are prescribed frequently für
`a variety of inflammatory skin diseases.
`METHODS
`
`Gell Preparations
`On the day of assay, venous blood was coll ected from hea lthy
`human vol unteers in a hepa rinized syringe. One ml of P lasmagel
`(HTI Corpora t ion , Buffalo, N . Y.) was added für each 10 ml of blood
`collected , and th e syringe was incubated a t 37oC in a n inverted
`position for 2 hr to permit Sedimenta tion of ce lls . The leukocyte- rich
`plasma was separa ted from the erythrocytes a nd centrifuged at 900
`rpm tor 10 min . The cell pell et was suspended in minima l essentia l
`media (MEM) (Gra nd Is la nd Biologica l Company, Gra nd Isla nd ,
`N. Y.) with 10% feta l ca lf ,'erum rFCS) rReheis Chemica l Corpora-
`tion, Phoenix, Ariz.), washed twice with MEM a nd resuspended in
`5 ml of MEM-FCS für counting. Th e fin a l leukocyte concentration
`was adjusted to 2.5 x 10"/ml by di lution with MEM-FCS, a nd a cell
`vi a bility of at least 99% was esta blished , us ing th e trypan blu e dye
`exclusion method.
`
`Chemotactic Factor
`Chemotactic factor was genera ted by in cuba tion of fresh or frozen
`( - 70°C) norma l huma n serum with zymosa n !Sigma Chemi ca l Co.,
`St. Loui s , Mo. ) in a concen tration of 2 mg/ml für 1 hr at 37°C. The
`zymosan was removed by centrifugation, a nd th eserum was hea ted
`to 56°C for 30 min to terminate the reaction I17J.
`
`ce~\al administration of certa in antibiotics a nd, more re-
`. ·~' .topJcal apphcatwn of these antibiotics have been
`c
`01181 eted effective therapeutic rneasures for pa tients with
`acne vulg·a · s
`.
`.

`n s. uccess w1th these agents has been attnbuted,
`ln part t
`th
`.
`.
`0
`e reductwn m numbers of n01·mal cutaneous
`f1
`'
`w~;~·tharticularly Cor:ynebacterium acnes , and to interference
`3J. Thu e actwn of bacteria l lipases on sebum triglycerides /l -
`and b s, by. reducmg the populations of specific orga msrns
`th Y partJally suppressmg the formation of free fatty ac1ds,
`P e nlatura] Progression of acne lesions frorn comedones and
`apu es to p
`t I
`d
`.
`.
`b
`.
`ru t d
`. us u es an cysts theorebcal ly rn1ght e mter-
`thp e · Although nurnerous investigators have documented
`e effects of a t.b . t.

`t '
`h
`n I 10 1cs on cutaneous flora and on quantita-
`d~e c anges in suJ·face Iipids, not a ll of these studies have
`d monstrated a direct relationsh ip between administration of
`rug and r d
`t·

`.
`.
`.

`t .
`~ uc IOn 1n bacten a l coun ts a lteratwn 111 cornposi-
`Jon of suda
`1· ·d
`. .
`.
`'
`.
`.
`14-13 /. So ~e .1P1 s, a nd chmcaiimprovement of skm l esJ.~ns
`e
`.
`. me of the d1screpancws may be explamed by dlfler-
`u~~es, In rnet~odology; however, the participation of additional
`T~scnbed factors may account für the therapeutic eftect.
`. ere lsevJdence in the lite1·ature to suggest that certain
`.
`dntJmJcrobJ· 1 .
`.
`.
`. a
`agents may suppress leukocyte chemotax1s
`114 15
`J .. Smce mflamrnatory acne lesions which are most
`'
`usceptibl t
`.
`··b·
`.
`.
`,
`.
`S
`e 0 anti IOtJc therapy, are the resu lt ofan wflux of
`ol
`~ Ymorphonuclear leukocytes /16 1 it seemed z·easonable to
`cons1der th h
`·h


`'
`.
`.
`ta .
`.
`e ypot es1s that suppress1on ot leukocyte chemo-
`Thx~s ~ght account, in pa rt, for the effi cacy of these agents.
`
`Prepara.tion o/ Antibiolies
`The füllowin g drugs were tested in chemotax is assays: erythro-
`mycin base lAbbott Laboratori es, North Chi cago, 11 1. ), tetracycline
`HC I ILederl e Laboratories, Pea rl R iver, N . Y.), clinda mycin HCI
`(Upjohn Compa ny , Ka lamazoo, Mich. ), penicill in G-Na rUpjohn
`Compa ny, Ka lamazoo, Mi ch .), da psone IAyerst La boratori es, New
`York, N. Y .), a nd su lfapyridine rLilly La boratories, lndi a napo li s,
`l nd. ). Stock solutions of each a ntibiotic were prepa rcd in MEM a nd
`appropriate a mounts added to ach ieve the desircd concen tra tion in
`the chamber. High concentra tion stock solutions of sulbpyridine
`a nd da psone were prepa red in absolute ethanol a nd diluted with
`MEM. Tetracycline HC I a nd erythromycin basc were assayed 111
`concentra tions of .01 J.Lg/ml, 1 J.Lg/ml , 10 J.Lg/mi, a nd 300 J.Lglm i.
`Clinda mycin H CI was added in concentrations of .2 J.Lg/ml , 2 J.Lg(m i,
`20 J.Lg/ml, and 200 J.Lglm l; peni cill in G-Na in w ncentratwns of .01
`J.tg/m l, .1 J.tg/ml, 10 J.tg/ml, a nd 100 J.tg/ml. Sulfapyndme was tcsted
`at 50 J.tg/ml a nd 100 J.tg/m l a nd dapsone a t 25 J.tg/ml a nd 50 J.tg/ml.
`Antibioti cs were added to the lower (attracta nt) compa rtm e ~1t ofthe
`cha mber in the first set of experirnents. In il second set of ex pen -
`ments
`th e antibiotic was added to the leukocyte Suspension in the
`upper 'compa rtment. Chemotactic assays with each concentra tion of
`drug were perfünned in duplicate or tripli ca te.
`
`Chemotaxis Assays /1 8/
`The cha mbers used for the assays were of the Sy kes-Moore type
`lßellco B iologica l Glasswa re and Equiprnent, Vineland , N.J. ) I lHI .
`Two Millipore filters IMi ll ipore Corporation , Bedfürd, Mass.) 25
`mm in di a met.er a nd 3 1-' porc size were inserted between the t.wo
`compa r tments a nd held in place by a rubber gasket 1201 . The
`cha mber was sea led at both ends by a 25-mm circul a r glass cover
`slip macbester Scientifi c Co., Rochcster, N. Y .). lnjcction of materi -
`
`ec s of several of these agents on leukocyte chemotaxis in
`
`eft' ,t sent study represents an atternpt to measure the
`29.~~~~script received May 5, 1977; accepted for publication Ju ly
`MS hupported in pa rt by the Medi ca l Resea rch Institute Counci l
`Ic aei Reese Hospita l a nd Medi ca l Center.
`'
`0 ~epnnt request to: Dr. Nancy 8 . Esterly, D irector, Division of
`. e~ %atology, Depa r tment of Pediatrics, Michael Reese Hospita l
`~~616 . edr ca l Center, 29th Street a nd E ll is Avenue, Chicago, Illinois
`Abbrevia t ions:
`FCS: feta l calf seru m
`MEM: minima l essen tia l medi a
`
`51
`
`Exh. 1019
`
`

`
`52
`
`ESTERLY, FUREY, AND FLAN AG A N
`
`20
`
`19
`
`18
`
`17
`
`16
`
`15
`
`14
`
`13
`~
`~ 12
`V)
`-~ II
`Cl:
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`I
`
`r
`
`!!Ii
`
`~
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1111
`
`NONE
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`III
`
`~
`
`300)Jg
`
`I
`I
`~ ilj
`
`rl l
`
`.OI)Jg
`
`... ~
`
`I)Jg
`IO)Jg
`CONCENTRATIONS OF TETRACYCLINE HCL
`I' h
`F1c 1 Chemotact1. · . t. ·t
`.
`c ac IV I y o

`.
`uman leukocytes with dif'l·, ., •
`cuncentrat 1ons of letr 1 .
`e1 enc
`. 1. ,
`of the chamber
`.
`c tyt tne HCI added to the lower compa rtment
`: C!eUI bars represent thc rnean of 8 assays r + 1 SO)
`I. . ..
`01 1 andom m1grat 10n of 1, k . t
`. D
`-
`v· I
`. I + 1 SO
`. .
`.
`eu ocy es.
`arh bars represent mean
`) l01 neutroph d chemotaxis.
`a ues -
`
`<~I ~ ~as, madc. w.i t~ a 25_gauge needle through the chamhcr ports.
`I I.tcement ol .1 second ~aga uge ncedl e 1n the opposite po1·t al lowed
`n1r to e~ca pc dunng III IIng, resulting in a hubble-free charnbcr.
`One-ha ll ml ol lcukocytc suspension 11.25 x 10n cclls) was addcd to
`the uppcr compa rtment, a nd a n 0.8 ml aliquot of fl uid 11 part
`human scrurn w1th or w1thout zy rnosa n plus 1 part MEM-FCS with
`or without drugJ wus added to thc lower chamher. In the second set
`of expcriments, appropriate concentrations of dru g in MEM were
`added to thc lcukocyte suspension in the upper compartment . Thc
`chambers were incubated a t :l7°C for :l hr. The lilters were removccl ,
`lixed and sta ined
`in an eth a no l, hcmatoxyli n, ethanol, xylene
`sequence, a nd mounted with Permount on slides for counting. The
`cells on each hottom li lter were counted in :10 ra ndom fi elds using a
`IOx ocu lnr and 40 x ohjective.
`in a steri le fashion, and th e
`All suspensions werc prcpa red
`cha mhers werc nutoclavcd prior to use. No prohlems with bactcrial
`" rowth were cncountered. Cell viahi lity was checket! aga in with
`Lrypan bluc dye a t t.hc tcrrn in ation of each ex periment and rern ained
`.
`,
`grea tcr thnn ~)9'/r in nll charnhcrs.
`Statisticu l a na lysiswas perform ed us1ng Stud ent s I = lest.
`
`RESU LTS
`T he mca n v;d ues :!:: 1 S O für thc che motaxis assays w i ~h
`te tracycli nc-HC I are depicted in F ig 1. The mcan va lue for
`random migration of' cclls f'rom 8 huma n vo lunteers 18 sepa-
`ra te assaysJ was 2.9 :!:: 0. 8 cc ll s/hpf', whereas the mea n Wiih
`chemotactic factor was 10.8:!:: 2.5 cc lls/hpf' lp =< .0005l . Whe n
`tetJ·acycline was added in concentrntions of' .01 fLg/ ml , 1 fLg/
`rn l a nd 10 fLg/ml , thc1·e was strik ing supp ression of'che mota x1s
`lp =< .0005), most ma rkcd a t conce ntrations of 1 (Lg and 10
`':"[!;/ml. Minima l inhibition of nt ndom migration was ohserved
`at the sa me concentrations lp =< .025 with I (Lg/m l of dru g;
`
`Vol. 70, No . l
`
`other values not sig nifi cant). However, a t a concentration of
`300 fLg/m l, there was no effect on chemotax is (mean of 11 .7 ::!:
`2.1 cells/hpf) or ra ndom migra tion lm ean ~f 3.3 :!:: 0.7 cells/
`hpf) .
`The effects of erythr omycin base on leukocyte chemotaxis
`as shown in Fig 2 were s imi lar to th ose of te tracycli n e . T he
`mca n value for ra ndom migra tion of cell s in 8 assays w as 3.0
`:!:: 0.4 cells/hpf and that for ch e motax is 14.0 :!:: 1.0 cell s /hpf
`lp =<: .005). Concentrations of .01 fLg/ml , 1 (Lg/ml, and 10 p..g/
`m l of et·ythromycin cau sed significa nt suppt·ession of chemo-
`ta~ Js lp = < .0005 for a ll concentrations) a nd b ad a minimal
`~flect on nmdom migration lp = < .01 für .01 fLg/m l; p = < .ü05
`for l (Lg/ml a nd 10 fLg/m l). Erythromycin at 300 fLg/m l fa iled
`to m h1b1t chemotaxis or ra ndom m igration, a nd the v a ]ues
`obta med w1th th is concentration of drug were not sign ifica ntly
`dtfferent fi·om thc mean contml values 13.0 :!:: 0.4 cells/hpffor
`random m igration a nd 14.0 :!:: 1. 1 cells/hpf für chemotax is).
`Cli ndamycin HC I a lso caused inhibition of' chernotaxis a t
`concentrations of .2 fLg/m l, 2 fLg/ rnl, 20 fLg/ ml, a nd 200 fl.gjrnl
`as demonstrated in Fig 3. The mea n value für t·andom migra-
`tiOn was 3.2 :!:: 0.5 cell s/hpf and th a t für hemotaxis 12.9 ::!: 1.9
`cells/hpf (p = < .0005). There was significant suppression of
`ch?motaxis a t a ll concentrations (p = < .0005) a nd a min imal
`eflect on ra ndorn m igration (p = .01 at .2 and 2 fLg/m l; p = < .l
`at 20 [Lg/ m]) with the lower concentrations of drug .
`In contJ·ast, pe n icillin G-Na in concentrations of' .01 f.Lg/ml ,
`.1 [Lg/ml , 10 fLg/m l, a nd 100 fLg/rn l fai led to inhibit leukocyte
`moti li ty IFig 4). Neithe r sulfa pyridine in concentrations of 50
`fLg/ml a nd 100 fLg/m l nor dapsone in concentrations of 25 fLgl
`ml a nd 50 (Lg/ml had a ny perceptible eflect on leukocyte
`move ment unde t· the condit ions of t he assay IFig 5).
`
`20
`
`18
`
`16
`
`14
`
`Q..
`<>::
`
`10
`
`"-Q..
`'1::
`" 12
`"' "' ~
`"' "' ~ :::;, "'
`"' "" "' ~
`
`8
`
`6
`
`I I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`~
`
`rt
`
`~ I
`
`~I
`
`NONE
`
`.O IJJg
`
`(JJQ
`
`I
`I
`
`111
`I'
`dll
`II II!
`
`~ I
`I i
`
`300)Jg
`
`CONCENTRATIONS OF ERYTHROMYCIN BASE
`F'tG 2. Chemotactic activity of huma n leukocytes with dif!'erent
`concentrations of'erythromycin hase ndded to thc lower compa ,·tment
`of th e charnber. Cleur hurs represent the mean of 8 assays I:!:: 1 SD)
`fo r ra ndom migrntion of leukocytes. Durh bars represent mean
`va lues 1::':: 1 SOl for neutrophi l chemotaxis.
`
`Exh. 1019
`
`

`
`~-
`
`Jan.1978
`
`20
`
`18
`
`16
`
`14
`
`~
`
`"-~
`" 12
`"' ~
`"' Q:)
`~ ::::.
`~ 8
`~
`~
`~
`
`!);:
`
`10
`
`6
`
`EFFECT OF A NTIMICROBIAL AGENTS ON LEUKOCYTE C HEMOTAXIS
`
`53
`
`been utilized in previous studies to dernonstra te the effect of
`drugs on the migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes . The
`antiinllarnmatory agents, chloroquine, hydrocortisone, a nd
`rnethyl prednisolone have been shown to suppress chemotaxis
`by direct action on the neutrophil 122 1. Mafenide aceta te and
`sulfadiazine compounds, widely used for the treatment of
`burns, a lso appear to cause ma rked inhibition of leukocyte
`rnotility 1191.
`Martin et al. observed reduced migra tion of leukocytes
`obtained fi·om human volunteers with Mycopla.sma. pnew rw-
`nia.e infection who were receiving tetracycline 1231. Subse-
`quent studies demonstra ted tha t concentrations oftetracycline
`ranging from 0.01 to 10 J.Lg/ml depressed both random migra-
`tion a nd chemotaxis of leukocytes toward Mycopla.smu a nti-
`gen 1141. In contrast, concentra tions of tetracyclinc nmging
`from 30-300 J.Lg/ml caused Stimula tion of neutrophil move-
`ment. The mecha nisms by which the drug influences white
`cell movement are unknown, but it has been suggested that
`these effects may rela te to altera tions in white cell metabo-
`lism.
`Although we used zymosa n-induced chemotactic factor
`ra ther tha n Mycoplasm.a a ntigen as a chemoa ttractant, our
`studies confirm the findings of Ma rtin a nd co-workers. Gon-
`centrations of tetracycline in the ra nge of therapeutic blood
`Ievels !0.1- 10 J.Lg/m]) appeared to inhibit neutrophil chemo-
`taxis whereas tetracycline in very high concentm ti on 1300
`J.Lg"/ml) fai led to suppress chernotaxis. The effect of tetracycli ne
`on random migra tionwas less pronounced in ow· assay system
`tha n in the study of Ma rtin et al. Thi s disparity in t·esults
`rnay be a ttributable to severa l differences in methodology . lt
`is uncl ear whether the tetracycline was added to the upper
`
`20
`
`18
`
`)6
`
`14
`
`~
`
`"-~
`" 12
`"' ~
`~
`~ 10
`!);: "' Q:)
`~
`::::.
`""
`~
`"<(
`.....
`~
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`!
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`rt l
`
`I
`
`I
`
`r±
`
`rr
`
`rf
`
`~
`
`NONE
`
`./)J g
`
`IOJ.Jg
`
`/00)Jg
`
`CONCENTRATIONS OF PENI CI LLIN G Na
`F1c 4. Chemotactic activ ity of huma n leu kocytes with diflerent
`concentrations of penicillin G-Na added to the lower compa rtment
`of the cha mber. C/ea r ba rs represent the mea n of 8 assays I± I SOl
`for ra ndom migration of leukocy tes. Dark hars represen t rn ean
`va lues ( ± I SD) for neutrophil chemotnx is.
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`rf
`
`~
`
`~
`
`tt
`
`NONE
`
`.2)Jg
`
`&
`
`200)Jg
`
`CONCENTRATIONS OF CLINDAMYCIN-HCL
`FIG 3. Chemotactic activity of huma n leukocytes with different
`concentra tions of clindamycin H CI added to the lower compa rtment
`of the chamber. Clear ba.rs represent the mean of 8 assays ( ± 1 SDl
`for ra ndom migra tion of leukocytes. Dark bars represent mean
`valu es ( ± 1 SDl for neutrophil chemotax is.
`
`In the second set of experirnents when the drugs were
`added directly to the leukocyte suspensions prior to incuba-
`tion , the results obtained were cornpa rable to those depicted
`in F ig 1- 5 (Ta ble). Tetracycline HCI, erythromycin base a nd
`clinda mycin-HCI a t the s~ rne concentra tions indica ted in the
`fi gures ca used ma rked suppression of chernotaxis a nd minimal
`suppression of m ndom rnig ra tion. The rnean values for ran-
`dom rnigration fell slightly below the control v~ lues , a nd.
`were the same order of magnitude as in the ftrst set of
`expe rime nts . The only significa nt difl"erence noted between
`this set of experirnents and those described above was a
`fa ilure of clinda rnycin HCI to inhibit chemotaxis when added
`in a conce nt1 c~tion of 200 J.Lg/ml (p = < .0005). Penicillin G- Na,
`sulfa pyridine a nd dapsone had no efl"ect on leukocyte chemo-
`t axis when added to the upper compa rtment of the cha mber.
`
`DISCUSSION
`A ntimi crobi a l agents are frequently used to treat infla m-
`m a tory disorders of the skin tha t a re cha t·acterized by a n
`infl ux of polyrnorphonuclear leukocytes but a re not due to
`bacterial infection. Although severa l hypotheses have been
`advanced to account for the eflect of these drugs in infl a mma-
`tory conditions, the proposed mecha nisms of action a re still
`controversia l, owing to conflicting da ta . A possible effect on
`]eukocyte migration has received little consideration in the
`development of these concepts; therefore, it seemed of i nterest
`to study the interaction of a ntimicmbia l drugs and polymor-
`phonuclear leukocytes in a n assay systemfür chemotaxis:
`The modjfied micropore cha mber has proved tobe a reltable
`systern in which the chemotactic t·esponse of white bl ood cells
`ca n be assayed in the la bora tory 1211. This technique has
`
`Exh. 1019
`
`

`
`54
`
`ESTERLY, FUREY, AND FLANAGAN
`
`Vol . 70, No.l
`Chemotactic activity oj' hunwn leulwcytes with different concentmtions o{antimicrohia/ agen.ts culded to the upper compartm.ent oj' the
`clwmber. Vulues areexpressedas means o/'8 assays :t:: 1 SD
`----~--~--------~~==~
`~~--~--------~-------
`Erythr omycin
`Tetracycli ne
`Clindamycin
`Pen icill in
`Su lfapyridin e
`Dapsone
`None
`None
`None
`3.0 :t:: .:l
`2.5 :t:: .5
`2.2 :t:: .4
`None
`2.4 :t:: . J
`3.7 :t:: .5
`3.7 :t:: .5
`Zyrnosan
`Zyrno-
`Zyrno-
`12.7 :t:: . 7
`11.2 :t:: .3
`11.0 :t:: 1.0
`Zyrno-
`13.3 :t:: .5
`13.5 :t:: .9
`13.5 :t:: .9
`san
`san
`san
`. 01 jJ.g
`.2 jJ.g
`100 jJ.g
`.2 jJ.g
`. 01 jJ.g
`100 JJ.g
`+ Z
`+Z
`+ Z
`1 jJ.g
`2 jJ.g
`50 JJ.g
`1 jJ.g
`2 jJ.g
`50 JJ.g
`+Z
`+ Z
`+Z
`10 jJ.g
`20 jJ.g
`10 jJ.g
`20 jJ.g
`+Z
`+ Z
`300 jJ.g
`200 JJ.g
`2.2 :t:: .3
`300 jJ.g
`200 jJ.g
`10.8 ± .9
`+Z
`+ Z
`~~- ~- -- ~- . -
`- -~- ---
`
`2.2 ::!::: .:3
`2.2 :t:: .5
`
`1. 9 :t:: .4
`2.4 :t:: .2
`
`2.0 ± .4
`2.6 ± .4
`
`.01 jJ.g
`.01 jJ.g
`+ Z"
`1 JJ.g
`I JJ.g
`+Z
`10 jJ.g
`10 jJ.g
`+Z
`300 jJ.g
`:100 jJ.g
`+Z
`" Z = zymosan
`
`2.5 :t:: .8
`2.2 :t:: .5
`
`2.3 :t:: .2
`2.2 :t:: .1
`
`2.4 ± .2
`2.2 ± .3
`
`2.:J :t:: .4
`12.0 ± .8
`
`2.0 :t:: .1
`2.2 :t:: .2
`
`2.2 :t:: .1
`2.1 :t:: .2
`
`2.2 ± .2
`2.6 ± .6
`
`None
`Zyrno-
`san
`.01 jJ.g
`.01 JJ.g
`+ Z
`.1 jJ.g
`.1 jJ.g
`+ Z
`10 JJ.g
`10 jJ.g
`+ Z
`100 J.Lg
`100 JJ.g
`+Z
`
`2.1 :t:: .1
`13. 1 :t:: .8
`
`2.1 :t:: .2
`12.5 :t:: .8
`
`2.1 ± .2
`13.2 ± 1. 6
`
`2.3 :t:: .2
`13.7 ± .6
`
`None
`Zyrno-
`san
`50 jJ.g
`50 jJ.g
`+Z
`25 jJ.g
`25 jJ.g
`+Z
`
`3.2 :t:: .4
`13.7 :t:: 1.5
`
`3.1 :t:: .2
`13.6 ± 1.3
`
`:L6 :t:: .4
`14.1 :t:: .7
`
`3.7 :t:: .9
`14.4 ± 1.8
`
`2.9 :t:: .4
`12.7 ± 1.7
`
`20
`
`18
`
`16 -
`
`14
`
`12
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`-
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`I
`
`~ 1:
`I I
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`1
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`t
`
`I
`I
`I
`
`I I
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`i
`I
`
`I
`
`1111
`
`NONE
`
`S50)Jg
`
`SIOOJ.Jg
`
`CONCENTRATIONS OF SULFAPYR/0/NE (S) ANO OAPSONE (0)
`FIG 5. Chemotactic activity of human leukocytes with di ffe rent
`concentrations of sulfa.pyridin.e and dap::;one added to the low.er
`compartrnent of the charnber. Clear bars represent the mean o! 8
`assays ( ± J SDJ for randorn mig1·ation of leukocytes .. Durh bars
`represent mean values I ± 1 SDJ for neutroph!l chemotax1s.
`
`ileukocyte) compartment or the Jower (chemoattractant) com-
`partme nt of the cha mber or whether the leukocytes were.
`preincubated with tetracycline prior to assay m the study oi
`Martin et a l. Other investigators 122,24 1 have shown that
`::;uppression of white cell movement is more pronounced when
`the inhibiting substance is added to the leukocyte rather
`than the chemoattractant side of the micropore ti lter. In
`addition, preincubation of leukocytes with drug prior to injec-
`~o~i~nto the chamber rnay augment the effects on leukocyte
`lty 1.24 1. Poss1bly our fai lure to demoostrate a drarnatic
`
`effect on random rnigration may reside in this latter proce-
`dural difference.
`Erythromycin base and clindamycin HCI, Jike tetracycline,
`also appear to inhibit leukocyte motility in vitro . These data
`support the tindings of Plewig and Schöpf [15J in a study of
`the etl'ects of antimicrobial agents on pustular dermatitis JD
`humans, induced by 40% potassium iodide ointment. Topical
`application of tetracycl ine and erythromycin suppressed the
`pustular reaction whereas penicil lin G-Na and diaminodi-
`phenylsulfone had no effect. Oral administration of tetracy-
`cline and erythrornycin also inhibited the pustular reaction to
`topical potassium iodide, but oral penicillin G-Na fail ed to
`suppress the dermatitis. Systemica lly administered diamino-
`diphenylsulfone exhibited the most pronounced a ntiinflarn-
`matory effect in contrast to its inefl'ectiveness when applied
`topically. The concentrations of diaminodiphenylsulfone used
`in our study are h igher than the blood Ievels that would be
`expected from the oral dosages utilized by P lewig and Schöpf
`125-27 1. Although we detected no suppression of leukocyte
`chemotaxis, it is conceivable that suppression m ight be ob-.
`served a t lower concentrations. Alternatively, the effect of
`diaminodiphenylsulfone on the inflammatory response rnaY
`be mediated through mechan isms other tha n chemotaxis 1.27-
`30 I, however, these data are controversial 1.31].
`Plewig and Schöpf postulated that their data m ight be
`explained by a n effect of specific drugs on leukocyte rnigratioD ·
`Our data support this hypothesis and suggest that inhibit!On
`of leukocyte rnovement may, in some circumstances, be an
`important mechanism by which certain antimicrobial agents
`suppress intlammatory skin disease .
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Kligman AM: An overview of acne. J Invest Dermatol 62:268-
`~87,_ 1974
`.
`.
`.
`.
`. I
`2. Shahta AR: Genes1s of free fatty ac1ds. J Invest Derrnato
`J
`62:332-335, 1974
`3. Marples RR: The microOora of the face and acne lesions.
`Invest Derrnatol 62:326- 331, 1974
`4. Kraus SJ : Reduction in skin surface free fatty acids with topical
`tetracycli ne. J Invest Derrnatol 51:431- 434, 1968
`5. Marples RR, Downing DT, Kligrnan AM: Control of free fattj
`ac1ds m human surface hp1ds by Co,ynebacterium acnes ·
`Invest Derrnatol 56:127- 131, 1971
`6. Hassing GS: Inhibition of Corynebucterium acn.e::; by tetrac.Y-
`cli ne. J lnvest Dermatol 56:189- 192, 1971
`7. Mills OH, Marples RR, Kligman AM: Acne vulgaris oral theraPh
`w1th tetracychne and top1cal therapy with vitarnin A. AJC
`Dermatol 106:200-203, 1972
`8. Cun liffe WJ, Coterill JA, Williamson B: The effect of cii ndalli.I'J
`cm m acne: A chn!cal and Iabaratory investigation. BI
`Dermatol 87:37- 41, 1972
`C
`9. Cunliffe WJ, Forster RA, Greenwood ND, Beatherington
`'
`
`Exh. 1019
`
`

`
`Jan.J978
`
`Holland KT H
`William ,
`, . olmes RL, Khan S, Roberts CD, Williams M,
`Iab
`son B. Tetracyclme and acne vulgans: A chmcal and
`10. Fulto~r~~ry mvestigation._ Br Med J 2:332-335, 1973
`Stud of' :ablo G : Top1cal antibacterial therapy for acne:
`86, 1§74 t e family of erythromycins. Arch Dermatal 110:83-
`11. Baer RL L h
`apy . ' es aw SM, Shalita AR: High-dose tetracycline ther-
`12. Resh :;) s~vere acne. Arch Dermatal 112:479-481, 1976
`vulga ' .. tau?htan RB: Topically applied antibiotics in acne
`riu
`n s. Chmcal response and suppression of Corynebacte-
`m~~i
`n open comedones. Arch De1matal 112:182-184,
`1976
`13. Anderson RL
`topi , 1
`, Cook CH, Smith DH: The effect of oral and
`com ca . tetracyclme on acne severity and on surface Iipid
`14. Marti~~Ihon. J Invest Dermatal 66:172- 177, 1976
`oftetra R, Warr GA, Couch RB, Yeager H, Knight V: Effects
`15. Plewig G c1c!~~e on leukot~txis . J Infect Dis 129:110- 11_6, 1974.
`agents-' Ac _opf E: AntJ-mflammatary effects of antimicrobial
`16. Kunts
`· D n m VIVo study. J Invest Dermatal 65:532-536, 1975
`Th on D: Ultrastructura l observations in acne vulgaris:
`De~m~otorml al sebaceous follicle and acne lesions. J. Invest
`17. c
`a
`62:288- 307 1974
`ornely HP· R
`'
`.
`· eversal of chemotaxis in vitro and chemotactJc
`acti .t
`335 ,v;9~~f leukocyte fractions. Proc Soc Exp Bio! Med 122:831-
`18. Baum J M
`mea
`'
`owat AG, Kirk JA: A simplified method for the
`froms~rement of chemotaxis of polymorphonuclear leukocytes
`19. Ward ~man blood. J Lab Clin Med 77:501- 509, 1971
`cy~nh D, Mason AD Jr, Pruitt BA Jr: Suppression of leuko-
`th
`c emotaxis in vitro by chemotherapeutic agents used in
`19; 5 management of thermal injw·ies. Ann Surg 181:363-369,
`
`22.
`23.
`
`55
`20. Keller HV, Bore! JF, Wilkinson PC, Hess MW, Cottier H:
`Reassessment of Boyden's technique for measuring chemo-
`taxis. J Immunol Meth 1:165- 168, 1972
`Keller HV, Hess MW, Cottier H: Physiology of chemotaxis and
`random motility. Semin Hematal 12:47-57, 1975
`Ward PA: The chemosuppression of chemotaxis. J Exp Med
`124:209-226, 1966
`Martin RR, Warr G, Couch R, Knight V: Chemotaxis of human
`leukocytes: Responsiveness ta Mycoplasma pneumon.iae. J Lab
`Clin Med 81:520-529, 1973
`Goetzl EJ, Wasserman SI, Gigli I, Austen KF: Enhancement of
`random migration and chemotactic response of human leuko-
`cytes by ascorbic acid. J Cl in lnvest 53:813- 818, 1974
`25. Lorincz AL, Pearson RW: Sulfapyridine and sulfone type drugs
`in dermatalogy. Arch Dermatal 85:42-56, 1962
`26. Alexander JO'd, Young E, McFadyen T, Fraser NG, Duguid
`WP, Meredith EM: Absorption and excretion of""S dapsone in
`dermatitis herpetiformis. Br J Dermatal 83:620-631, 1970
`Mier PD, V an Den Hurk JMA: Inhibition of lysosomal enzymes
`by dapsone. Br J Dermatal 93:471-472, 1975
`Barranco VP: Inhibition of lysosomal enzymes by dapsone. Arch
`Dermatal 110:563-566, 1974
`Thompson DM, Souhami R: Suppression of the Arthus reaction
`in the guinea pig by dapsone. Proc R Soc Med 68:273, 1975
`Provost TT, Tomasi Jr TB: Evidence for the activation of
`complement via the a lternate pathway in skin disease: II.
`Dermatitis herpetiformis. Cl in Immunol Immunopathai 3:178-
`186, 1974
`Katz SI, Hertz KG, Crawford PS, Gazze LA, Frank MM, Lawley
`PJ: The effect of sulfones on complement deposition in derma-
`titis herpetif01'mis and on complement-mediated guinea pig
`reactions. J lnvest Dermatal 67:688- 690, 1976
`
`EFFECT OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS ON LEUKOCYTE CHEMOTAXIS
`
`21.
`
`24
`.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`Exh. 1019

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket