throbber
f
`
`(
`
`!
`
`No, 7733
`
`VOL.
`
`THE LANCE
`r
`
`BOSTON, MASS, AND LON;;~~-~o~~TURDAY 13 NOVEMBER 1971
`C 0 N TE NT S
`LETTERS TO THE EDITOR~.cÄt.
`Griseofulvin
`in Raynaud's Phenomenon
`Tin;: WIIOLll
`(Dr. P:jNnidoo; Dr. A, Herxheimer; Dr.
`OP THE LITERARY MATTER IN THE LANGET IS COPYRIGijT~~\CR! &'
`R. A'llen) ..... , ........................ 1090
`r ~--
`lteiatio
`.
`philos Disease and Ccll-surface Anti-
`nsh1p between p tt
`fl fi
`ti
`d D
`(Dr. D. C. Turk) ................... 1090
`1
`h
`.<:tYpoaib
`.
`a ern o n ec on an
`eve opment
`RECEIVEilm
`suppressive Elfect of_ Surgery (Dr.
`unlln~mia and Hypo·~·lipoprotein~mia in Rural ib
`U
`. owell, Sheila G. Radford) ...... 1091
`J.
`"'""" 2,.,
`J. gDanLdan Children
`'7 io-Aspaf ginase ancl Lymphocyte Blasto-
`Fnoon
`.
`4.1!,, gcnes s (Dr, Isaiah J, F1dler and others)
`~W1f if'o
`'
`, ••• 1047
`'M,B,, R, G. WHITEHEAD, l'H.D., W, A. COWARD, PH.D.
`1091
`C
`SEIIW.S~--,aJ; us-chloride Treatment for Ana:mia
`Olfip
`.R.. ~nl'ative Effectiveness of Tetracycline and Ampicillin in
`•v.:Hmmodlalysis Paticnrs (Dr. L. s.
`9 IJI'\1
`-~Y'a!berg) .... , ............................... 1092
`I<s, M.R.C,I', J ELLIS M
`lJ
`' •
`,
`spirln-induced H)'Eoglyclcmla in a Patient
`.R,C,P, •• , , , ••.•. , ••• , • , , ••. • • • · • • • · • • • • ·
`l'ain Trau
`on Hrumodialysis (Dr. David S, David and
`b, W rr '<tna and the Postconcussional Syndrome
`others)
`.................................... 1092
`'-· "' AY M R c PSY
`T A K
`Bchocardiography
`in Gongenital Heart-
`'
`L. 1>. LASSM~N .p . .R '0
`diseasc (Dr. Robert Solinger and others)
`ERR, M.R.C,I'SYCH,,
`CI-I,,
`'
`'
`:p
`' . ' .s.
`. ... '.'.'.''' ' •... ''' ' .. ' '.'.'. '.'' .. '' '' .. ' 1052
`1093
`henytoin
`ti
`Vitamin E lnelfccrive in Recurrent Psychosis
`3 ter Recovery from Myocardia1 Infarction
`(Mr. R. H:. Gosling, n.sc., and otheri- 1094
`CoLLA!l
`Hf:i!~risji~~:~~.'' ... ~·-~ ... ~~-~~~~-.:~~.' .... W8~1
`lnd
`O.RAtrvn Gnoup
`. , .. , ...... , . , .. , .. , , ...... , , . , , . , , . , , .. , .. , , . 1055
`Uction f M'
`Multiple Sclerosis: Occupation and Social
`Id-trimester Therapeutic Abortion by Intra~amniotic
`0
`Ul'e
`Group at Onset (Dr. A. M. G. Campbell)
`lA» c · a and lntl'avenous Oxytocin
`1095
`1058 When to Remave rhe I.U.D, (Mr. Gracme R.
`RAFT, M.R.c.O.G BABAYO Mu
`C
`SA, M • .R.
`Duncan, P.n.c.s.) '"""'"""'""""' 1095
`· • • • · · · • • • • • • · • · • • · •' · • ·
`-.-.
`''

`,O.G,
`'-'ed-biood
`11
`Complement-fixing and .Fluorescent Anti-
`~ce • Survival after SpJenectomy in Congenitai
`Sphe
`bodies in Diagnosis of E.-B.-virus !nfec-
`"
`rocytosis
`.
`tions (Dr, R. N. P. Sutton and others) 1095
`-"-· N. BArnn F n
`' · .C,S,Il., A. I. S, MACPHERSON, I•',R,C.S.E,,J, RICHMOND, P,R.C.P. 1060
`Royal College of Psychlntrisrs (Dr. Anthony
`r.
`W. Glare) """"""""'"""""""" 1096
`epuk:a:mia and B C G
`Treatment of Lupus Nephritis (Dr. J, M.

`rof G
`• • •
`Simister) .................................... 1096
`· W CoM
`The Human Predicament (Dr. S, Bradshaw)
`STOCK, M.D., V, T. LIVIlSAY, n.s,, R. G, WEBSTER, R.N.
`'
`•
`1096
`Kvcim Tests in Crohn's Diseuse (Dr. J, A.
`PnELIMINARy
`Chapman and others) .................. 1097
`Cellular Origin of Grnnulocyte Coionies in
`;lOMMliNICA TIONS
`terect u ·
`Chronic Mycloid Lcukmmia (Dr. Richard
`Itum
`K. Shadduck, Dr. Howard R. Nankin)
`~nary Kallikrein Excretion in
`I{ an Ypertension
`1097
`Glucose Thcrapy in Sh<irt-bowel Syndrome
`n :;\RRY S · MARGOLXUS M D
`(Dr. Charles D, Gcrson, Dr, Henry D.
`<'-ONALD GELLER PH ~ , .,
`}anowitz)
`................................. 1098
`JOI-tN' J, P!SANö 1PH ~ ,,
`Prevcntion of Dccp-vein Thrombosis with
`S
`'
`' ''
`Subcutancous Heparin (Dr, B, Y. Pai,
`ALBE
`bo ,
`, , , , 1063
`RT
`JOERDSMA, M.D,
`'Mr. D. Negus, r.R.c,s.) '"'""""""" 1099
`d R·
`,
`lllJnant
`Early Introduction to Pathology (Prof, N, F.
`her't
`an
`ecesstve Modes of In-
`Mctcalf, M.D,, nnd othcrs) ............ 1099
`~ ance in Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy .
`Neocortical Denth nfter Cardiac Arrest (Miss
`R~CHA!U) EMANUEL, P.R.C.P.,
`Anne Rot, 1\l.D., Baroness H. A. H. vnn
`., N'ALD Wrn-mns M sc
`Till, LL,D,) ................................. 1099
`<(Ay O'B
`'
`'
`''
`Bluc Sclerotics
`in Iran Deficiency (Dr,
`RIEN • , , , , , • , • , , , , , 1065
`Robert M. Bennctt) '"""'"""""'" I JOO
`Viruscs and Whooping-cough (Prof, N, R.
`!PECIAL ARTICLES
`Grist1 F.R.C.PATfl., Dr. C. A. C, Ross) 1100
`J.he:a· h
`Medical Oncology (Dr, R. M. Clnrk) ... 1100
`Te ll't of an Abnormal Child:
`Bromism (Dr. M. W. P. Camey) ......... 1100
`~ling the Parents
`~lONALASSOCIATION FORMENTAL
`OBITUARY
`1075
`llALTII WORI<ING-PARTY
`Cecil Charles Worster-Drought.,
`..
`0
`Joseph Stanley Hopwood,,,.,, ..
`CCA.SIONAL SlJRVEY
`Tl'anspi
`.
`Margaret FitzHerbert., . , , , .. , ...
`antation-Nature's
`S
`Uccess
`J. MAXWELL ANDBRSON, F.R.C.S, 1077
`llosprrAL PRACTICE
`lnfluenc
`•
`.
`f H
`p
`. e o
`ospital S1ting on
`atlent Visiting
`Prof. THOMAs McKEOWN, F.R.c.P.,
`K. W, CRoss, PH,n.,
`._D. M, KEATING, M.R.C.P,I., , • , 1082
`
`• • • •
`
`1062
`
`Treatment and Prevention
`of Siekle-eeil Crisis. . . . . . 1069
`Sudden Death in Infants, ... 1070
`Is Phenytoin Carcinogenic? 1071
`Talking to Parents , , .. , , , , . . 1072
`Cogs in Nced of Oil. , ..••.. , . 1073
`Pesticides as Mutagens. , .. , . , . 1073
`Treatment of Malnourished
`Children .. ,.,, .. , . , . , , , .•. 1074
`Abortion: New Restraints on
`Private Clinics.,., .. ,, .•. ,, 1074
`
`LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
`Amnesia after Clioquinol
`(Dr. Knud
`Kjrersgaard) .............................. 1086
`Treatment of Stage-u Gareinoma of the
`Fernale Breast (Dr. Diana Brinkley, Dr.
`J, L, Haybittle) ........................... 1086
`Hepatitis-associated Antigen and Hepatoma
`in the U.S. (Dr. E. Alpert, Dr. K. J.
`Isselbacher) ........... , .................. )087
`Chondroitin-6-sulphaturia, Defective Ccllu-
`Jar Immunlty, and Nephrotic Syndrome
`(Dr. R. Neil Schimke and othm) ... 1~88
`Low X-chromatin Frcqucncy ln Gongenttal
`Adrenal Hyperpjasia (Dr. J, H. Schneer,
`Dr. Al. Naghi) ............................ 108,9
`Mental Retardation und Spnsttc Paraparests
`in Four of Eight Siblings (Dr. Robcrt B,
`Allport) ...... " ........................... , J 089
`Is Menkes' Syndrome a Heritable Disorder of
`Connective Tissue? (Dr. David M, Danks
`and others) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. 1089
`
`1101
`1102
`1102
`
`NOTES AND NEWS
`Sterile Nursing Unitat the
`Middlesex Hospital
`. , ....... .
`Christmas Cards .. , . , , ... , , , , , , ,
`University of Dundee, ... , •. , , , ..
`Univcrsity of Edinburgh , •. , , , , .
`University of Glusgow , , .. , . , ..•
`Royal College of Physicians of
`Edinburgh .. , . , . , , . , •.... , , , 1103
`
`1103
`1103
`1103
`1103
`1103
`
`Editorial Office: 7 Adam Street London WC2N 6AD, Englund. North Americail Edition published
`$~d Com~any, 34 Beacon St,, B~ston, Mass, 02106.
`In U,S, and Canada, annual s_u,bscriptio?. $18.50;
`13 1.50; smgle copy $2.00, Second class postage paid at Boston, Mass,, and at addltlonai mathng office
`· November 1971. Notification on Form 3579 is to be mailed to The Lancet, 34 Beacon Street,
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ud., et al.
`V.
`Galderma Laboratories, lnc.
`IPR2015-__
`Exhibit 1007
`
`

`
`No, 7733
`
`•
`e;.:-"
`BOSTON, MASS. AND LONDON · SATURDAY 13 NOVEMBER 1971
`
`/
`/
`VOL. I! Foy197y
`
`THE LANCE~
`r
`
`CONTENTS
`
`LETTERS TO THE EDITOR-.cLt.
`Griseofulvin
`in Raynaud's Phenomenon
`1'HB WHOLB 0
`(Dr. P.'{Naidoo; Dr. A. Herxheimer; Dr.
`1
`R. ~llen) ............................... 1090
`F THE LITERARY MATTER IN THE LANGET IS COPYRIGI:ITX\)\CI"'{ /.
`h
`/ ~ ..
`J:\elation h.
`phllus Dtsease and Cell-surface Anti-
`s lp hetween Pattern f I ~ t'
`d D
`I
`(Dr. D. C. Turk) .................. 1090
`b
`0
`n.~.ec Ion an
`QYPoaib
`eve opment ·
`•
`•
`RECE.IVEOm
`. suppressive Etfcct of Surgery (Dr.
`ununremta and Hypo-~-Iipoproteinremia in Rural 55'
`, ~well} Sheila G. Rndford) ...... 1091
`D
`J.
`7 A--Aspartgmase and Lymphocyte Blasto-
`J. tanLdan Children
`~. genes s
`· FRoon M
`R
`.
`(Dr. Isaiah ] . Ftdler and others)
`.B.,
`• G. WHITEHEAD, PH.D., W. A. COWARD, PH.D.
`'
`, ... 1047
`1091
`C
`0 lllpar
`~ cdl.. baly6us-chloride Treatment for Amcmia
`•
`R MAn!sttve Effectiveness of Tetracycline and Ampicillin in
`".d"~n/.:Hmmodialysis Patients (Dr. L. s.
`, M R c p J E
`2fgi\\~.)Va1berg) .. .. . .. . .. .. • .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. 1092
`"
`• LLIS, M.R,C.P. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · • · · · · · • · · • · · · · • · · ·
`:t\spirin-induced H)'Eoglyca!mia in a Patiem
`}l
`' . ' '>
`l'ain l'l"au
`on Hremodialysis (Dr. David S. David and
`b. w. I< Ktna and the Postconcussional Syndrome
`others)
`.................................... 1092
`L. p L. AY, M.H.C.PSYCI-I., T. A. KERR, M.R.C.PSYCH.,
`Echocardiography
`in Congenital Heart-
`. ASSMAN, F.R.c.s
`disease (Dr. Robert SoHnger and others)
`Pb
`. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
`1093
`enytoin afi
`Vitamin E Inetfective in Recurrcnt Psychosis
`CotLABOR
`ter Recovery from Myocardia1 Infarction
`(Mr. R. H. Gosling, n.sc., and others) 1094
`ATrvE GRoup .............................................. 1055
`lnd
`Uction of M· d
`.
`Multiple Sclcrosis: Occupation and Social
`1 •trtmester Therapeutic Abortion by Intra-amniotic
`d
`Drea
`Group at Onset (Dr. A. M. G. Campbell)
`lAN C an
`lntravenous Oxytocin
`1095
`RAFT, M.R.C.O.G BAB
`M
`1058 When to Remove the I.U.D. (Mr. Graeme R.
`!{
`''
`· • · · · • · · · · · · • · · · · · · • · · · ·
`AYO
`USA, M.R.C.O.G,
`Duncan, F.R.C.$.) ........................ 1095
`ed .. blood-
`CompJement-fixing and Fluorescent Anti-
`•
`]l
`•
`Sphe
`ce : Survtval after Splenectomy in Congemtal
`bodies in Diagnosis of E.-B.-virus Infec-
`.R
`rocytosis
`tions (Dr. R. N. P. Sutton and others) 1095
`· N". BAnm FR '
`A
`,
`Royal College of Psychiatrists (Dr. Anthony
`' ' .C.S,E.,
`· l. S. MACPHERSON, F.R.C.S.E., J, RJCHMOND, F.R.C.P.
`W. Clare) ................................. 1096
`epuk;:emia and ß C G

`Treatment of Lupus Nephritis (Dr. J, M.
`• • •
`rof. G W
`Sin1istcr) .................................... 1096
`The Human Predicament (Dr. S. Brads\1~~J
`· COMSTOCI<, M.D., V. T. LIVESAY, B.s., R. G. WEBSTER, R.N.
`'
`Kveim Tests in Crohn's Diseuse (Dr. }. A.
`~REtlMINARY
`Chapman and others) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 1097
`Cellular Origin of Granulocyte Colonies in
`A.IOM.MtJNICA TlONS
`Chronic Myeloid Leukmmia (Dr. Richard
`terect Uri
`.
`K. Shadduck, Dr. Howard R. Nankin)
`I-Iurn H nary Kalhkrein Excretion in
`1097
`I-I an YPertension
`Glucose Thcrapy in Short~bowel Syndrome
`RgRRY S. MARoouus, M.D.,
`(Dr. Charles D. Gcrson, Dr. Henry D.
`J NALD GELLER PH D
`Ül-{ J
`] anowitz)
`...... · .. · · ... · · .. ·.............. I 098
`Prevention of Deep~vein Thrombosis with
`Atn N
`· PISANo, PH.D.,
`Subcutaneous Heparin (Dr. B. Y. Pai,
`.
`bo
`ERT SJOERDSMA, M.D .. • .. 1063
`Mr. D. Negus, F.R.c.s.) .................. 1099
`d R
`.
`llllllant
`Early Introduction to Pathology (Prof. N. F.
`~n . ecesstve Modes of In-
`herit
`Metcalf, M.D., and othcrs) ............ 1099
`RI ance lU ldtopathic Cardiomyopathy .
`Neocortical Death after Cardiac Arrest (Miss
`RoCHARn EMANUEL, F.R.c.P.,
`Anne Rot, M.D., Baroness H. A. H. van
`}( NALD WITHERs, M.Sc,,
`Till, LL.D.) .............. •••••••·· .......... 1099
`Blue Sdcrotks in
`Iron Deficiency (Dr.
`AY O'BRIEN
`Robert M. Bennctt) .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. I 100
`!PECIAt ARTIC~~~· ........ .
`Viruscs and Whooping-cough (Prof. N. R.
`Grist, F.R.C.PATH., Dr. C. A. C. Ross) 1100
`.t.hea· h
`Medical Oncology (Dr. R. M. Clark) ... 1100
`l'e] ~rt of an Abnormal Child:
`Bromism (Dr. M. W. P. Carncy) ......... 1100
`N hng the Parents
`~ION AL ASSOCIA TION FORMENTAL
`EALTH WaRKING-PARTY .. 1075
`0
`l' CCASIONAL SURVEY
`l'anspi
`•
`antatton-Nature's
`S
`Uccess
`lJ J. MAXWELLANDERSON~ F.R.C.S. 1077
`1 OSPITAL PRACTICE
`f H
`.
`.
`nfluence
`P
`.
`o
`ospttal Stting on
`attent Visiting
`~ro&r THOMAS McKnowN, F.R.C.P.,
`D ·
`· CRoss, PH.o.,
`--- . M. KEATING, M.R.C.P.I. .... 1082
`
`Treatment and Prevention
`of Siekle-eeil Crisis .. ,... 1069
`Sudden Death in Infants .... 1070
`Is Phenytoin Carcinogenic? 1071
`Talking to Parents ......... .
`1072
`Cogs in Need of Oil. ..•.•....
`1073
`Pesticides as Mutagens ....... .
`1073
`Treatment of Malnourished
`Children ................. .
`Abortion: New Restraints on
`Private Clinics ........... .
`
`t
`
`~
`
`l
`
`• • ,
`
`1065
`
`105~
`-
`
`H~!~risYi~~~~~.s ... ~~.l ... ~~.~~~~ .. ~~~: ... ·~);r0~~
`
`1060
`
`. ... 1062
`
`1074
`
`1074
`
`OBITUARY
`Cecil Charles Worster-Drought. . 1101
`Joseph Stanley Hopwood ........ 1102
`Margaret FitzHerbert. . . . . . . . . . . . 1102
`
`NOTES AND NEWS
`Sterile Nursing Unitat the
`Middlesex Hospital ......... .
`Christmas Cards ............... .
`University of Dundee ........... .
`University of Edinburgh , ...... .
`University of G1asgow ......... .
`Royal Coiiege of Physicians of
`Edinburgh .... , ............ .
`
`1103
`1103
`1103
`1103
`1103
`
`1103
`
`Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`THE LANCET, NOVEMBER 13, 1971
`
`We are now investigating these metabolic processes.
`They are partly the reason why a child is precipitated
`into a clinical episode of kwashiorkor. These factors
`and also the role of the immune response will be
`enlarged upon in future communications.
`Few other studies have been madeon the effects of in-
`fection on serum-albumin, except where these infections
`have led to specific loss of prorein through the gut or
`kidney. There was no gross proteinuria in the children
`in this series, although a trace was sometimes observed
`during pyrexial episodes, as might be expected. Loss
`of albumin through the gut could not be investigated,
`but this possibility is now being pursued as a separate
`project, although it is anticipated this will be of only
`minor significance except perhaps during measles,
`gastroenteritis, or when there is severe worm infesta-
`tion. Albumin concentration does fall significantly
`after surgery, 8 but the cause is not known. Of par-
`ticular relevance to the ß-lipoprotein results are the
`investigations of Platt, 0 , 1 o who showed that infection
`could lead to a fatty liver in laboratory animals even
`when the prorein content of the diet was apparently
`adequate.
`It is becoming more obvious that the pathogenesis
`of kwashiorkor is complex and is a product of the
`child's whole environment.
`It is just as important
`to combat disease as it is to improve diet, and any
`public-health scheme aimed at eradicating malnutrition
`should give equal consideration to both these crucial
`aspects of the problem.
`We thank the medical and nursing staff of this unit who run
`the outpatient clinics, and Mr. J. B. Kiwanuka, who analysed the
`blood specimens.
`Requests for reprints should be addressed to R. G. W.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Mata, L. J,, Urrutra, J, J,, Garcia, B. Ciba Fndn Swdy Grp, 1967,
`no. 31, p, 112. London, 1967.
`2. Whitehead, R. G., Frood, J. D. L., Poskitt, E. M. E. Lanc.Jt, 1971,
`ii, 287.
`3. Coward, W. A., Whltchead, R. G. Br. J, Nutr. (in the press),
`4. Flores, H., Pak, N., Maccioni, A., Mönckebcrg, F. ibid. 1970, 24,
`1005.
`5. Poskitt, E, M. E. La11cet, 1971, ii, 68.
`6. Coward, D, G., Sawyer, M. B., Whitehead, R. G. Am.J. cli11. Nutr.
`1971, 24, 940.
`7. Hciskell, C, L., Fisk, R. T., Florsheim, W. H., Tachi, A., Goodman,
`J, R., Carpentcr, C. M. Am. J, c/i11, Path. 1961, 35, 222.
`8, Mouridson, H. T. CUu. Sei. 1967, 33, 345,
`9. Orraca-Tetteh, R., Platt, B. S, Proc, Ntttr. Soc. 1964, 23, iii.
`10. AI-Rnbii, H. A., Platt, B. s. ibid. 1964, 23, iv.
`
`H ••• I will not labour my own conviCtiOn that the
`normal state of most people is to feel faintly tired, harassed,
`and under the weather-and that my clinical observations
`lead me to believe that an abounding sensation of positive
`health usually presages either a cardiac infarction or incipient
`hypomania. The fact remains that the concept of positive
`health is as popular with some apostles of preventive
`medicine as with lay journalists. It postulates a state that
`could apparently be achieved by the careful observation
`of a set of rules that · vary with the writer, but which are
`always inconvenient and uncomfortable and usually eccen-
`tric. I question the whole concept of positive health and
`the validity of the prescriptions claimed to ensurc it.>'-
`HENRY MILLER, M.D., in Medical History and Medical
`Care ( edited by GoRDON McLACI-ILAN and THOMAS
`McKnowN); p. 224. London, 1971.
`
`1049
`
`COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF
`TETRACYCLINE AND AMPICILLIN IN
`ROSACEA
`A Controlle<l Trial
`R. MARKS
`J, ELLIS*
`Institute of Dmnatology> St. John's Hospital jor Diseases
`of the Sldn) London W.C.2
`
`56 patients with papular rosacea were
`S
`treated with tetracycline, ampicillin, or
`ummary
`placebo in a randomised double-blind clinical trial.
`Patients were evaluated by counting the number of
`papules in predetermined sites on the forehead and
`left cheek at fortnightly intervals over a six-week
`period. The results showed that both tetracycline and
`ampicillin produced a significant decrease, at the 5%
`level, in the number of papules, compared to the
`placebo treatment. When the results were assessed by
`a scoring system, tetracycline and ampicillin proved
`significantly better than placebo (P =0·05); tetracycline
`was better than ampicillin, but the difference did not
`quite reach the 5% significance level.
`Introducdon
`THE tetracycline group of antibiodes has been used
`in the treatment of acne vulgaris since shortly after
`their introduction in the early 1950s,
`In controlled
`clinical trials some groups have found that the tetra-
`cyclines improve acne, 1 • 2 whereas another has found
`that these antibiodes were of little help. 3 The present
`consensus is that tetracyclines improve acne slowly,
`incompletely, and irregularly.
`In contrast to many reports on the use of antibiodes
`in acne, there have been few similar reports on rosacea
`and even fewer which describe a controlled clinical
`trial.
`In this study we have compared the effectiveness of
`tetracycline and ampicillin in the treatment of rosacea
`in order to determine (1) whether, with objective
`assessment, there is significant improvement, and (2)
`whether the action of the tetracyclines is unique or
`is shared by other antibacterial agents.
`
`Patients and Methods
`Patients were admitted to the trial if they had typical
`rosacea characterised by the presence of persistent erythema
`of the cheeks and nose, chin, and forehead and papules
`(and/or pustules) on these areas. Patients without easily
`definable papules were not included. In addition, patients
`who had received treatment with. antibiodes in the previous
`six weeks were not included. Patients who satisfied these
`criteria were randomly allocated to one of three coded
`treatment groups by the hospital dispensary. The placebo,
`tetracycline, and ampicillin were supplied in identical
`capsules, and neither patients nor investigators knew the
`identity of the group to which each participant belonged.
`The instructions given to each patient were to take one
`tablet three times a day for the first week, and then to
`reduce the dose to one twice daily for the subsequent five
`weeks. No other treatment was permitted apart from the
`use of an aqueous cream as an cmollient.
`Patients were seen and assessed at fortnightly intervals,
`whenever possible, for six weeks. At each visit the nurober
`• Present nddress: Slnde Hospital, Oxford.
`
`Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`1050
`
`THE LANGET, NOVEMBER 13, 1971
`
`TABLE I-NUMBER OF PAPULES RECORDED AT BACH ATTENDANCE IN EACH PATIENT
`
`0
`
`1
`
`-
`
`Tetracycline
`
`Week
`
`3
`
`-
`
`-
`
`5
`
`4
`
`8
`6
`1
`
`5
`
`-
`
`-
`
`0
`
`6
`
`4
`9
`0
`
`2
`
`-
`
`9
`6
`10
`
`12
`
`Ampicillin
`
`Wcek
`
`0
`
`1
`
`-
`
`2
`
`-
`
`3
`
`-
`
`4
`
`-
`
`4
`
`-
`
`6
`
`6
`4
`10
`11
`6
`
`-
`
`5
`
`6
`
`6
`
`Placebo
`
`3
`
`Weck
`4
`4
`
`-
`
`-
`
`5
`
`-
`
`6
`
`7
`
`-
`
`Patient
`no.
`----
`1
`9
`2
`10
`54
`7
`17
`10
`18
`12
`20
`11
`22
`28
`27
`14
`7
`32
`33
`14
`36
`48
`25
`37
`39
`24
`32
`40
`46
`7
`25
`48
`49
`15
`59
`16
`60
`28
`25
`61
`
`8
`5
`
`6
`
`3
`
`5
`
`5
`
`21
`16
`
`22
`23
`17
`
`11
`10
`12
`37
`1
`
`4
`2
`13
`8
`
`31
`25
`19
`14
`1
`0
`9
`15
`1
`
`4
`
`0
`
`1
`
`4
`0
`5
`8
`0
`17
`7
`23
`
`1
`0
`0
`2
`8
`0
`
`Patient
`no.
`7
`- ----
`24
`3
`10
`4
`16
`6
`12
`11
`21
`23
`6
`26
`9
`28
`8
`29
`9
`31
`84
`41
`16 17
`42
`28
`44
`6
`50
`20
`52
`53
`17
`13
`57
`59
`62
`
`3
`
`9
`7
`9
`14
`9
`13
`8
`
`73
`
`1
`35
`17
`11
`37
`
`2
`
`23
`
`4
`10
`7
`6
`8
`1
`19 18
`4
`2
`15
`11
`10
`21
`
`16
`
`7
`3
`5
`7
`1
`15
`0
`36
`6
`8
`
`2
`2
`17
`12
`6
`1
`10
`
`8
`
`Patient
`no.
`1
`7
`0
`- --------
`8
`5
`12
`9
`13
`22
`17
`15
`24
`16
`21
`7
`4
`24
`28
`25
`30
`8
`20
`35
`38
`9
`7
`43
`45
`60
`47
`11
`51
`23
`24
`54
`34
`55
`17
`56
`19
`64
`
`8
`38
`75
`34
`21
`18
`
`-
`5
`12 16
`9
`13
`9
`0
`10
`13 22
`11
`14
`15 28
`35
`
`0
`23
`28
`31
`18
`13
`
`11
`18
`10
`0
`14
`
`10
`15
`
`1
`30
`20
`41
`23
`15
`
`55
`
`18
`45
`
`of papules and pustules in predetermined areas on the
`forehead and right cheek were counted (see accompanying
`figure). In order to use the identical area, in each patient
`at each visit two flexible frames were used. The internal
`measurements for the forehead frame were 8 x 4 cm., and
`those for the right cheek frame were 4 X 5 cm. When counting
`lesions on the forehead the centre of the frame was made to
`coincide with the midline of the nose and its Iower margin
`was placed on the supraorbital ridges. When using the
`frame for the cheek the upper and outer angle of the
`reetangle was placed on the lateral orbital tubercle so that
`one of the Ionger 5 cm. edges touched the lower border of
`the orbit. Lesions touching the lower and left margins of
`the frames were not counted. All palpable lesions were
`counted. To check that this method of assessment was
`reliable, repeated lesion"counts were made on the same
`patients by both observers at the beginning of the investi-
`gation. The values obtained were almost always identical,
`occasionally differing by one or, when many papules were
`present, two lesions. At each visit the patient's assessment
`of his progress and the observer's subjective assessment of
`the amount of erythema present were also recorded. In
`addition, patients were asked at each attendance whether
`the prescribed treatment had agreed with them, and any
`symptoms present were recorded.
`
`Tested areas on forehead and right check.
`
`56 patients completed the trial-20 in the tetracycline
`group, 17 in the ampicillin group, and 19 in the p1acebo
`group. The mean age of the 56 patients was 47·8 years
`(range 20-69) and there were 27 men and 29 women.
`
`Results
`Table I gives the number of papules and pustules
`for each patient at each attendance in the three treat-
`ment groups. Table n shows the mean numbers of
`papules and pustules before and at the end of the
`treatment period.
`
`TABLE Il-MEAN NUMBER OF LESIONS±STANDARD DEVIATION
`IN BACH TREATMENT GROUP
`
`-
`Pre-treatment
`Post-treatment
`
`Tetracycline
`
`Ampicillin
`
`Placebo
`
`21·05±12·79
`
`21·06±20·48
`
`18•47±13-14
`
`4·60± 6·20
`
`9·53± 8·79
`
`16·63 ± 12·81
`
`These means were subjected to analysis of variance,
`which indicated significant differences between some
`of the means. Duncan's multiple-range test showed
`that:
`(1) The pre-treatment means were not significantly
`different from each other or from the post-treatment mean
`of the placebo group.
`(2) The post-treatment mean for the ampicillin group
`did not differ from the post-treatment means for the
`tetracycline and placebo groups, but was significantly lower
`than the pre-treatment means.
`(3) The post-treatment mean for the tetracycline group
`was significantly Iower than all the other means except the
`ampicillin post-treatment mean.
`The overall significance level'is 5%.
`The results were also analysed by. giving a score to
`the change in the number of lesions between the first
`and last attendance in each patient, thus: a decrease in
`lesions by 75% or more (+3); a decrease by 50-75%
`( + 2); a decrease by 30-50% ( + 1); a change in the
`number of lesions ±30% (O); an increase in lesions
`by more than 30% ( -1). The scores that result from
`this analysis are shown in table nr. The mean scores
`
`Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`THE LANCET, NOVEMBER 13, 1971
`
`1051
`
`TADLE III-NUMBERS OF PATIENTS WITH SCORES FROM +3
`TO -1 IN BACH OF THRllll TREATMENT GROUPS
`
`Score
`
`Tetracycline Ampicillin
`
`Placebo
`
`Totals
`
`-1-3
`+2
`+1
`0
`-1
`
`Totals
`
`9
`8
`0
`3
`0
`20
`
`3
`6
`4
`.3
`1
`
`17
`
`I
`
`2
`2
`4
`5
`6
`
`19
`
`15
`16
`8
`11
`7
`
`57
`
`TADLE IV-RESULTS OF PATIENTS' OWN ASSESSMENTS
`
`Category
`Much better
`Better
`Same
`Worse
`
`Tetracycline
`
`Ampicillin
`
`5
`9
`4
`2
`
`8
`6
`2
`1
`
`Placebo
`
`6
`3
`7
`3
`
`by dermatologists because of their successful use in
`acne and because in rosacea they were found empiri-
`cally to be effective.
`The lack of evidence for a bacterial cause raised the
`question of how the tetracyclines work in this condi ...
`tion. It was decided to determine whether an anti-
`bacterial action is involved, by comparing the clinical
`effectiveness of tetracycline with an antibacterial agent
`that worked in a different way to the tetracyclines-
`i.e., ampicillin. Our finding that both ampicillin and
`tetracycline are statistically better than placebo in the
`treatment of papular rosacea is presumptive evidence
`for the involvement of bacteria in the pathogenesis of
`the disease.
`In acne it is believed that Corynebacterium acnes, a
`member of the normal sldn flora, is responsible for
`hydrolysis of the triglycerides of sebum, with the
`liberation of irritant and comedogenic fatty acids. 8
`The tetracyclines have been shown to reduce the
`fatty-acid content of sebum, and this may explain their
`action in acne. 0
`It is difficult to accept that anti-
`biodes act in a like manner in rosacea. In rosacea the
`inflammatory response is characterised by redema and
`a loose admixture of lymphocytes and large histio-
`cytes which is not markedly centred around the
`follicles, while in acne there is an acute folliculitis.
`Comedones are not usual in rosacea, and, in addi-
`tion, rosacea is not common areund puberty when
`sebum is secreted at a high rate. None the less, it
`appears likely that bacteria play some as-yet un-
`defined role in the disease, and that antibiotics are
`etfective clinically by virtue of their action on these
`microorganisms.
`I t has been shown that tetracyclines are deposited
`preferentially in the sldn, 10 •11 and this may explain the
`better result that we obtained with tetracycline than
`with ampicillin.
`In this trial we tested the effect of antibiotics on the
`papules of rosacea because these lesions can be readily
`counted. Furthermore, it had previously been observed
`that they are more readily affected than the erythe-
`matous component of the disease. In the short time
`that we observed our patients there did not seem to be
`any pronounced or consistent change in the depth or
`extent of erythema in any of the treatment groups.
`The persistence of the erythema may explain the less
`dramatic results obtained when the patients' own
`subjective assessments were compared.
`There are few published reports of formal clinical
`trials involving the use of the tetracyclines in rosacea.
`Sneddon u reported that in a controlled clinical trial
`tetracycline was effective in 87% of 78 patients.
`Wereide 13 also noted "excellent or good ,, results in
`82% of 74 patients treated with methyl-L-lysine tetra-
`cycline. Both these workers noted that small doses of
`tetracycline sufficed to suppress the appearance of
`papules. The present trial seems to have been the first
`in which objective criteria have been adopted to show
`that the tetracyclines are effective in the treatment of
`rosacea.
`
`We are grateful to Pfizer Ltd. for supplying the tetracycline,
`ampicillin, and placebo packed in identical capsules; and to Miss
`C. Pullin, of the Wellcome Research Laboratories, for statistical
`analysis of the results. R. M. is in receipt of a grant from the
`Medical Research Council.
`
`I
`I
`I
`for each group are as follows: tetracycline 2·15, ampi-
`cillin 1·41, placebo 0·42. The tetracycline and ampi-
`cillin scores differ significantly from placebo score at
`the 5% level. The difference between tetracycline and
`ampicillin does not quite reach the 5% significance Ievel
`but is probably real.
`Brythema
`There did not seem to be any significant change in
`the extent or depth of erythema present during the
`trial.
`Patients' Subjective Assessment
`When patients were asked whether they considered
`themselves much better, better, the same, or worse,
`both tetracycline and ampicillin appeared to score
`better than placebo. Ampicillin seemed marginally
`better than tetracycline (table IV).
`Side-effects
`No serious side-effects were encountered in this
`study. 2 patients developed troublesome diarrhcea
`after the first few days' treatment and were withdrawn
`from the trial; these were found tobeleng to the ampi-
`1 patient in the tetracycline group
`cillin group.
`experienced diarrhcea on 750 mg. daily but not on
`500 mg. daily; and 1 other in the ampicillin group
`complained of " persistent slight looseness of the
`bowel " not necessitating withdrawal from the trial.
`Interestingly, 1 patient (who was later found to be in
`the placebo group) developed a transient maculo-
`papular erythema and was withdrawn from the trial.
`Other mild transient complaints included " a funny
`taste in the mouth ", "nausea ,,, "constipation ", and
`" secretions drying up ".
`Discussion
`Rosacea is a common and troublesome disease
`characterised by persistent erythema and crops of
`papules and pustules.
`Its cause is unknown, and
`various hypotheses on its retiology have been found
`unacceptable when their assumptions have been put
`to the test. ·t- 6
`In particular, cultures from biopsy
`material and pustules have not revealed pathogenic
`bacteria, and histologically there is no evidence that
`the disease is caused by microorganisms. 7 None the
`less the tetracycline group of antibiodes has been used
`
`Exh. 1007
`
`

`
`1052
`
`Requests for reprints should be addressed to R. M., Institute
`of Dermatology, St. John's Hospital for Diseases of the Skin,
`Lisle Street, Lciccster Square, London WC2H 7BJ.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Smith, M. A., Mortimer, P. R. Br. J. Dcrm. 1967, 79, 78.
`2. Lane, P., Williamson, D. M. Br, med. J. 1969, ii, 76.
`3. Crounse, R. G. J, Am. med. Ass. 1965, 193, 906,
`4. S0bye, P. Acta derm.-vener., Stockh. !950, 30, 137.
`5. Marks, R., Beard, R. J,, Clarkc, M. L., Kwok, M., Robcrtson,
`W. B. Lancet, 1967, i, 73,
`6. Marks, R. Br.J. Derm. 1968,80, 170.
`7. Marks, R., Rarcourt Webster, N. Archs Derm. 1969, 100, 683.
`8. Kligman, A. M., Wheatley, V. R., Mills, 0. H. ibid. 1970, 102,267.
`9. Frcinkel, R. K., Strauss, J, S., Yip, S, V., Pochi, P. E. Ncw Ellgi,J·
`Med. 1965, 273, 850.
`10. Rashleigh, P. L., Rife, E., Goltz, R. W. J. invest. Derm. 1967,
`49, 611.
`11. Marks, R., Davies, M. Br.J. Dmn. 1969,81,448.
`12. Sneddon, I. B. ibid. 1966, 78, 649.
`13, Wercide, K. Acta derm.-vmer., Stodth. 1969, 49, 176.
`
`BRAIN TRAUMA AND THE
`POSTCONCUSSIONAL SYNDROME
`T. A. KERR
`D. W.K. KAY
`L. P. LASSMAN
`Department of Psychological MedicineJ Royal Victoria In-
`jirmary and Um'versity of Newcastle upon Tyne)· and Neuro-
`surgical Unit" Newcastle General Hospital
`In a retrospective case-note study of
`Summary 474 patients with head injury admitted
`consecutively to a specialised unit, the hypothesis was
`tested that the outcome would depend on the severity
`of the initial trauma. The hypothesis was confirmed
`in regard to survival without definite brain damage,
`survival with brain damage, and death. But within
`the first group the difference between the " post-
`concussional " and recovered patients in terms of
`severity of the initial brain trauma was small. Patients
`with the postconcussional syndrome were better
`distinguished by psychosocial factors and by distur-
`bances of the special senses.
`
`Introducdon
`PoSTCONCUSSIONAL syndrome is used to describe
`symptoms-headache, dizziness, emotional instability,
`and impairment of concentration-which frequently
`develop after head injury. Sometimes these complaints
`become persistent and disabling despite the absence
`of obvious physical signs. As Critchley 1 pointed out,
`opinion has swung from a concept of organic to
`mainly neurotic causation and back again.
`The
`case for an organic cerebral retiology has been forcefully
`argued by Taylor. 2 But if brain trauma is a factor,
`the trauma must be of a subtle kind, since neither
`neurological signs nor the characteristic intellectual or
`personality changes associated with brain darnage are
`present.
`A study of a consecutive series of head injuries 3
`presented a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket