throbber
Acta Derm Venereol 2003; 83: 206–209
`
`CLINICAL REPORT
`
`The Prevalence of Onychomycosis in Patients with Psoriasis and
`other Skin Diseases
`
`GITTE KIELLBERG LARSEN, MERETE HAEDERSDAL and ELSE L. SVEJGAARD
`
`Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
`
`Onychomycosis among psoriasis patients is reported with
`varying prevalence. This prospective, controlled study
`investigates the occurrence of onychomycosis among
`inpatients with psoriasis versus inpatients with other skin
`diseases. The inclusion period was 15 months. Scrapings
`from clinically abnormal nails (both fingernails and
`toenails) were examined using microscopy and culture.
`The prevalence of onychomycosis in patients with psoriasis
`was 17/79~21.5% compared to 18/142~12.7% for
`(p~0.13).
`patients with other
`skin diseases
`In 17
`mycologically positive psoriasis patients, dermatophytes,
`yeasts and moulds were isolated in 8, 10 and 4 cases,
`respectively, and in 18 mycologically positive patients
`with other skin diseases in 12, 7 and 5, respectively.
`Onychomycosis occurred more frequently in men than
`in women (psoriasis patients (p~0.02), patients with
`other skin diseases (p~0.03)). Psoriasis patients had a
`higher frequency of abnormal nails (82.3%) compared
`to patients with other skin diseases (37.3%) (pv0.01)
`and more severe affection of their toenails than patients
`with other skin diseases (pv0.01). It is concluded that
`the frequency of onychomycosis among inpatients with
`psoriasis compared to inpatients with other skin diseases
`is not significantly different. Key words: dermatophytes;
`fungal infection; dermatology.
`
`(Accepted January 16, 2003.)
`
`Patients with psoriasis often have nail abnormalities.
`These are due to psoriasis itself, but may also occur in
`combination with onychomycosis (4, 5). Nail abnormal-
`ities in psoriasis may present as pitting, oil spots,
`subungual hyperkeratosis as well as thickening and
`change in colour of the nail. Excepting the first two
`abnormalities mentioned,
`the clinical manifestations
`may be confused with onychomycosis, and it is there-
`fore clinically difficult to distinguish between psoriasis
`and onychomycosis. Psoriasis of the nail may cause a
`higher susceptibility for infection with dermatophytes.
`In contrast, an infection with dermatophytes theore-
`tically might induce a local Ko¨ bner reaction. It is
`therefore important to clarify how frequent onycho-
`mycosis occurs in psoriasis patients. In the literature
`there are reports of variable frequencies of onycho-
`mycosis in psoriatics. The prevalence has been estimated
`(i) to be higher than among comparable healthy con-
`trols (4), (ii) to occur with almost the same frequency
`(5, 6), and (iii)
`to occur with a lower frequency
`compared to healthy controls (7).
`The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence
`of onychomycosis among inpatients with moderate to
`severe psoriasis and also among inpatients with other
`skin diseases.
`
`Acta Derm Venereol 2003; 83: 206–209.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Gitte Kiellberg Larsen, Department of Dermatology
`and Venereology, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg
`Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen
`NV, Denmark. E-mail: gittekiellberg@dadlnet.dk
`
`Onychomycosis in toenails is the most common nail
`disorder with a prevalence of 4.1% in patients from
`Danish general practices (pers. comm., Svejgaard).
`Prevalences of 2.7% and 8.4% have been observed in
`England and Finland, respectively (1, 2). The frequency
`increases with age, and onychomycosis occurs more
`often in men than in women and more often in toenails
`than in fingernails. Onychomycosis is mainly caused
`by dermatophytes, of which Tricophyton (T.) rubrum
`plays the main role, while yeasts are responsible for
`about 5% and non-dermatophyte moulds for 1 – 3% (3).
`
`Patients
`
`Patients with psoriasis and patients with other skin diseases
`were included from the in-patient clinic, at the Department
`of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenha-
`gen, during October 1999 – January 2001. The study was
`approved by the Regional Scientific-Ethical Committee and
`informed consent was obtained from all participants. The
`ages of the included patients were §18 years and ƒ70 years.
`Patients were excluded if systemic or topical antimycotic
`drugs were given within the last four months or within the
`last month, respectively. For each patient age, sex, and type
`of skin disease was registered, and for patients with psoriasis
`also the duration of disease.
`
`Clinical examination
`
`The following parameters were clinically scored: Area of
`abnormal nails: 0~no change, 1~0 – 30%, 2~30 – 60%,
`3~w60% change of the nail area. Hyperkeratosis, onycho-
`lysis, paronychial inflammation, colour change of the nail,
`
`Acta Derm Venereol 83
`
`# 2003 Taylor & Francis. ISSN 0001-5555
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2020 - 1/4
`
`

`
`Onychomycosis in patients with psoriasis
`
`207
`
`pitting and oil spots were graded separately on a 4-point
`scale: 0~no changes, 1~mild, 2~moderate and 3~severe
`changes of each of the evaluated parameters. A total score
`was summarized for the parameters, except for pitting and
`oil spots, which are not specific features in onychomycosis.
`Three investigators took part in the clinical examinations.
`Each patient was examined by one doctor.
`
`Statistical methods
`
`Non-parametric statistics was used for data presentation and
`comparisons between groups. Consequently, medians with 25th
`and 75th percentiles were used for descriptive statistics and
`the Mann-Whitney test for 2-group unpaired comparisons.
`Fisher’s exact test was used for frequency analysis. Pƒ0.05
`was regarded as statistically significant.
`
`Mycological examination
`
`Only clinically abnormal nails were examined for onychomy-
`cosis. Nail scrapings were obtained from a maximum of four
`fingernails and/or four toenails from each individual. The
`material was examined with direct microscopy using Calco-
`fluor white (8) and a fluorescence microscope. Cultures were
`performed on Sabouraud-glucose-agarzchloramphenicol¡
`cycloheximid.
`Dermatophytes were identified according to their macro-
`and microscopic morphology. Dermatophytes identified only
`by microscopy were also considered significant for derm-
`atophyte infection (4). Yeasts were further identified using
`CHROM-agar Candida (9). Moulds were not further iden-
`tified, and only those with positive microscopy¡positive
`culture were registered as moulds.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Seventy-nine patients with psoriasis and 142 with other
`skin diseases were included in the study. Patients with
`psoriasis had a higher frequency of abnormal finger-
`nails and toenails (82.3%) as compared to other derm-
`(pv0.01)
`atological patients (37.3%)
`(Table I). The
`overall median duration of psoriasis was 22 (10 – 31)
`years. For psoriasis patients with onychomycosis the
`disease duration was 25 (14 – 30) years and for those
`without onychomycosis it was 20 (8 – 30) years (p~
`0.30).
`Table II illustrates the frequencies of onychomycosis
`
`Table I. Demographic data of patients with psoriasis and other skin diseases
`
`Psoriasis patients
`
`Patients with other skin diseasesa
`
`Overall
`
`Women
`
`Men
`
`Overall
`
`Women
`
`Men
`
`Age, median (25th – 75th percentiles)
`Number (n, (%))
`Patients with:
`Abnormal nails (n, (%))
`Abnormal toenails only (n, (%))
`Abnormal finger-nails only (n, (%))
`
`49 (43 – 60)
`79 (100)
`
`54 (44 – 63)
`34 (43.0)
`
`47 (40 – 57)
`45 (57.0)
`
`51 (33 – 58)
`142 (100)
`
`50 (28 – 57)
`65 (45.8)
`
`51 (38 – 60)
`77 (54.2)
`
`65* (82.3)
`62* (78.5)
`35* (44.3)
`
`26* (32.9)
`25* (31.6)
`11** (13.9)
`
`39* (49.4)
`37* (46.8)
`24* (30.4)
`
`53 (37.3)
`49 (34.5)
`11 (7.7)
`
`20 (14.1)
`17 (12.0)
`6 (4.2)
`
`33 (23.2)
`32 (22.5)
`5 (3.5)
`
`aMainly erysipelas, atopic dermatitis, eczema, sclerodermia and bullous skin diseases. Data are compared for subgroups of patients with psoriasis
`and other skin diseases. *pv0.01, **pv0.02.
`
`Table II. Mycological results from patients with psoriasis and other skin diseases
`
`Psoriasis
`
`Non- psoriasis
`
`Total no. of
`patients n~79
`
`Patients with
`abn. fn n~35
`
`Patients with
`abn. tn n~62
`
`Total no. of
`patients n~142
`
`Patients with
`abn. fn n~11
`
`Patients with
`abn. tn n~49
`
`Dermatophytes total
`Trichphyton rubrum
`Trichophyton mentagrophytes
`Epidermophyton floccosum
`Positive microscopy
`Yeasts total
`Candida albicans
`Candida krusei
`Trichosporon beigelii
`Moulds, non-dermatophytes total
`TOTAL number of patients
`
`8 (10.1%)
`6
`1
`0
`1
`10 (12.7%)
`2
`7
`1
`4 (5.1%)
`17 (21.5%)
`
`1 (1.3%)
`0
`0
`0
`1
`5 (6.3%)
`0
`5
`0
`0 (0%)
`6 (7.6%)
`
`8 (10.1%)
`6
`1
`0
`1
`7 (8.9%)
`2
`4
`1
`4 (5.1%)
`19 (24.1%)
`
`12 (8.5%)
`3
`5
`1
`3
`7 (4.9%)
`2
`5
`0
`5 (3.5%)
`18 (12.7%)
`
`0 (0%)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`2 (1.4%)
`1
`1
`0
`1 (0.7%)
`3 (2.1%)
`
`12 (8.5%)
`3
`5
`1
`3
`5 (3.5%)
`1
`4
`0
`4 (2.8%)
`21 (14.8%)
`
`Onychomycosis occurred in 17 patients with psoriasis and in 18 non-psoriatics. The occurrence of mixed infections makes the number of positive
`organisms exceed the number of patients. Furthermore, some patients had onychomycosis in both their fingernails and toenails. Abn.
`fn~abnormal fingernails. Abn. tn~abnormal toenails.
`Data are compared for subgroups of patients with psoriasis and other skin diseases (non-psoriasis).
`No significant differences were found.
`
`Acta Derm Venereol 83
`
`ANACOR EX. 2020 - 2/4
`
`

`
`208
`
`G. Kiellberg Larsen et al.
`
`in patients with psoriasis (17/79~21.5%) and in patients
`with other skin diseases (18/142~12.7%) (p~0.13).
`
`Dermatophytes
`Dermatophytes were demonstrated in 8 of 79 psoriasis
`patients (10.1%), (mainly T. rubrum), compared to 12 of
`142 (8.5%) non-psoriatics (mainly T. mentagrophytes)
`(p~0.85). Dermatophytes were found more frequently
`in men than in women in both psoriasis and non-
`psoriasis patients, i.e. 8 versus 0 (p~0.02) and 11 versus
`1 (p~0.03), respectively. Dermatophytes in fingernails
`were found in one person only (Table II).
`The median age of psoriasis patients with derm-
`atophytosis (51.5, 40.5 – 64 years) was similar to the
`median age of psoriasis patients without dermatophy-
`tosis (49, 42.5 – 59 years) (p~0.75). For non-psoriatics
`with dermatophytosis the median age (57.5, 52 – 65
`years) was significantly higher than for those without
`dermatophytosis (50, 30.5 – 57 years) (p~0.01).
`
`Yeast
`Yeasts were demonstrated in 10 of 79 psoriasis patients
`(12.7%), (mainly Candida (C.) krusei), and in 7 of 142
`non-psoriatics (4.9%),
`(p~0.08).
`(mainly C. krusei)
`Furthermore, there was no significant difference between
`women and men having yeast in their nails, neither
`(p~0.74), nor among the
`among the psoriatics
`non-psoriatics (p~0.47).
`
`Moulds, non-dermatophytes
`Moulds were demonstrated from only a few patients;
`4 psoriasis patients and 5 patients with other skin
`diseases.
`
`Severity of nail affection (total score)
`The total scores of clinical toenail affection did not
`differ from those of clinical fingernail affection within
`psoriasis patients (p~0.54) and within patients with
`other skin diseases (p~0.11) (Fig. 1). However, the
`psoriasis patients had a significantly higher total score
`for their toenails (19.0, 9.0 – 38.0) compared to the
`non-psoriatics (7.0, 4.0 – 16.0) (pv0.01) (Fig. 1). No
`differences were seen between the two groups concern-
`ing fingernails (p~0.83).
`In both patient groups, the severity of nail affection
`in patients with onychomycosis did not differ from that
`in patients without onychomycosis (Fig. 2).
`
`Fig. 1. The total scores of clinically abnormal fingernails (FN) and
`toenails (TN) are illustrated for patients with psoriasis (PS) and
`patients with other skin diseases (NonPS). The box extends from
`the 25th percentile to the 75th percentile with a horizontal line at
`the median value (50th percentile); whiskers extend from the mini-
`mum value to the maximum value.
`
`psoriatics included might have found a significantly
`higher frequency of yeasts in this patient group.
`Several clinical, controlled studies have been pub-
`lished (Table III). As in our study, Staberg et al. (5)
`and Sta¨nder et al. (6) did not find significant differences
`between the prevalences of dermatophytes in psoriasis
`patients compared to non-psoriasis patients (12.3%
`and 9.8%, respectively). Gupta et al. found a higher
`prevalence (8.0%) in the psoriasis group (4). However,
`as can be seen from Table III this prevalence did not
`differ from Sta¨nder et al. (6). Go¨ tz et al. (7) found a
`lower prevalence in the psoriasis group (14%) compared
`to the non-psoriasis group (32.7%), but a higher
`prevalence compared to the psoriasis groups in the
`studies mentioned above. The very high amount of
`dermatophytes in the nails of the control group is
`probably due to a high occurrence of fungal infections
`in the Ruhr district where the controls came from (7).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The present study is a prospective, controlled study,
`in which the prevalences of dermatophytes and yeasts
`were not significantly higher in psoriasis patients than
`in patients with other skin diseases (p~0.85 and p~
`0.08, respectively) (Table II). A higher number of the
`
`Fig. 2. The total scores of abnormal toenails are illustrated for
`patients with psoriasis (PS) and for patients with other skin diseases
`(NonPS)
`for both positive (Pos. myc.) and negative (Neg. myc.)
`mycological examinations. The box extends from the 25th percentile
`to the 75th percentile with a horizontal line at the median value
`(50th percentile); whiskers extend from the minimum value to the
`maximum value. Onychomycosis in fingernails was seen in only a
`few patients and, therefore, is not illustrated.
`
`Acta Derm Venereol 83
`
`ANACOR EX. 2020 - 3/4
`
`

`
`Onychomycosis in patients with psoriasis
`
`209
`
`Table III. Review of studies on onychomycosis in psoriasis patients
`
`Author, year
`
`Psoriasis patients
`
`Non-psoriasis
`
`Zaias (11) 1969
`Go¨ tz (7) 1974
`Feuerman (10) 1976
`Staberg (5) 1983
`Gupta (4) 1997
`Sta¨ nder (6) 2001
`Present study 2002
`
`n
`
`15
`100
`120
`78
`561
`250
`79
`
`Dermatophytes (%)
`
`Yeast (%)
`
`n
`
`Dermatophytes (%)
`
`Yeast (%)
`
`0
`14.0
`24.2
`12.3
`8.0
`9.8
`10.1
`
`Some*
`16.0
`15.0
`15.4
`0.5
`23.9
`12.7
`
`n.d.
`1000
`n.d.
`41
`922
`102
`142
`
`n.d.
`32.7
`n.d.
`9.8
`4.4
`10.8
`8.5
`
`n.d.
`n.d.
`n.d.
`9.8
`0.3
`6.9
`4.9
`
`Some of the studies included both fingernails and toenails (5, 6, 10, present study), while others only included toenails (4, 7). n.d.~ not done.
`*From subungual debris in 40 psoriatic nails of 15 patients, 22 yeasts were isolated.
`
`Staberg et al. found a tendency towards a higher
`prevalence of yeasts in the psoriasis group, but it was
`not significantly different from that of the non-psoriasis
`patients (5). Sta¨ nder et al. found a significantly higher
`prevalence of yeasts in the psoriasis group with nail
`changes (23.9%)
`(6). Gupta et al.
`found that
`the
`occurrence of yeasts in the psoriasis group was almost
`the same as in the non-psoriasis group (4).
`The investigations of Feuerman et al. (10) and Zaias
`(11) represent uncontrolled studies with very divergent
`results, i.e. dermatophytes present in 24.2% of abnor-
`mal nails versus 0 (Table III).
`Nail involvement in psoriasis is common, with reported
`incidences varying from 10% to 50% (11). In this study,
`82.3% had nail abnormalities (Table I). The patients
`in our study were recruited from the inpatient clinic,
`and could be assumed to be more severely affected than
`patients from the outpatient clinic, and this might
`explain the high occurrence of nail abnormalities. We
`found that the severity of nail affection could not be
`used as a marker of onychomycosis (Fig. 2).
`In the present study, only clinically abnormal nails
`were examined for onychomycosis, because onycho-
`mycosis
`is uncommon in normal appearing nails
`according to Gupta et al., i.e. 0.7% (4).
`As in other studies (5 – 7), the occurrence of yeast
`was relatively high. The presence of C. krusei in most
`of the cases is noteworthy. Actually, the number of
`psoriasis patients with yeast infection was higher than
`for those infected with dermatophytes. This finding
`differs from the distribution of pathogens in onycho-
`mycosis in the general population of otherwise healthy
`individuals,
`in which dermatophytes are the domi-
`nating cause of infection in more than 90%. Probably,
`the altered subungual
`tissue and onycholysis may
`facilitate the invasion of yeasts. Furthermore, the fast
`
`turnover of the nails in psoriasis patients theoretically
`may constitute an effective defence against dermato-
`phytes. We considered moulds as secondary invaders,
`as repeated cultures were not within the scope of this
`investigation.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Roberts DT. Prevalence of dermatophyte onychomycosis
`in the United Kingdom: results of an omnibus survey.
`Br J Dermatol 1992; 126 Suppl. 39: 23 – 27.
`2. Heikkila¨ H, Stubb S. The prevalence of onychomycosis
`in Finland. Br J Dermatol 1995; 133: 699 – 703.
`3. Summerbell RC, Kane J, Krajden S. Onychomycosis,
`tinea pedis and tinea manuum caused by non-dermato-
`phytic filamentous fungi. Mycoses 1989; 32: 609 – 619.
`4. Gupta AK, Lynde CW, Jain HC, Sibbald RG, Elewski
`BE, Daniel CR, et al. A higher prevalence of onycho-
`mycosis in psoriatics compared with non-psoriatics: a
`multicenter study. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136: 786 – 789.
`5. Staberg B, Gammeltoft M, Onsberg P. Onychomycosis
`in patients with psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol 1983; 63:
`436 – 438.
`6. Sta¨ nder H, Sta¨ nder M, Nolting S. Frequency of fungal
`involvement in nail psoriasis. Hautarz 2001; 52: 418 – 422.
`7. Go¨ tz H, Patiri C, Hantschke D. Das Wachstum von Derm-
`atophyten auf normalem und psoriatischem Nagelkeratin.
`Mykosen 1974; 17: 373 – 377.
`8. Haldane DJM, Robart E. A comparison of calcofluor
`white, potassium hydroxide, and culture for the labora-
`tory diagnosis of superficial
`fungal
`infection. Diagn
`Microbiol Infect Dis 1990; 13: 337 – 339.
`9. Odds FC, Bernaerts R. CHROMagar Candida, a new
`differential
`isolation medium for presumptive identifi-
`cation of clinically important Candida species. J Clin
`Microbiol 1994; 32: 1923 – 1929.
`10. Feuerman E, Alteras I, Aryelly J. The incidence of
`pathogenic fungi
`in psoriatic nails. Castellania 1976;
`4: 195 – 196.
`11. Zaias N. Psoriasis of the nail: a clinical-pathologic study.
`Arch Dermatol 1969; 99: 567 – 579.
`
`Acta Derm Venereol 83
`
`ANACOR EX. 2020 - 4/4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket