throbber
The Developmental Toxicity of Boric Acid in
`Mice, Rats, and Rabbits
`Jerrold J. Heindel 1, Catherine J. Price2, and Bernard A. Schwetz13
`'Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology Group, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of
`Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; 2Chemistry and Life Sciences, Center
`for Life Sciences and Toxicology, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
`Boric acid (BA) is a naturally occurring agent used in manufacturing processes and numerous consumer products. Because of the potential for both
`industrial and consumer exposure to boron-containing compounds, and the lack of developmental toxicity data, the National Toxicology Program
`evaluated the potential for boric acid to cause developmental toxicity in pregnant Swiss (CD-1) mice, Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 26-28/group), and
`New Zealand rabbits (n = 1 8-23/group). BA was provided in the feed to mice and rats at 0, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4% throughout gestation to attain steady-
`state exposure as early as possible during development. Average doses (mg/kg/day) were 248, 452, or 1003 for mice, and 78, 163, or 330 in rats.
`A separate group of rats received 0.8% BA in the feed, or 539 mg/kg/day only on gestation days (gd) 6 to 15. Rabbits were given BA (0, 62.5, 125,
`or 250 mg/kg) by gavage administration on gd 6 to 19. Maternal body weight, food and/or water consumption and signs of toxicity were monitored
`at regular intervals. At termination, gd 17 (mice), 20 (rats), or 30 (rabbits), the uterus was examined to determine the number of resorptions, dead, or
`live fetuses. Fetuses were weighed and live fetuses were examined for external, visceral, and skeletal defects. Mouse dams exhibited mild renal
`lesions (.248 mg/kg/day BA), increased water intake and relative kidney weight (1003 mg/kg/day BA), and decreased weight gain during treat-
`ment. Maternal rats exhibited increased liver and kidney weights at 2163 mg/kg/day BA, altered water and/or food intake at >163 mg/kg/day BA,
`and decreased weight gain at >330 mg/kg/day BA. In rabbits, signs of toxicity included decreased food consumption during treatment, and vaginal
`bleeding associated with pregnancy loss at 250 mg/kg/day. Maternal body weight (gd 9 to 30), weight gain during treatment, and gravid uterine
`weight decreased at 250 mg/kg/day. Relative maternal kidney weight (but not absolute weight) was increased at 250 mg/kg/day, but microscopic
`evaluation did not indicate any renal pathology associated with BA exposure. BA is a developmental toxicant in all three species. The lowest-
`observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) for developmental toxicity was 78 mg/kg/day for rats (fetal weight reduction), 250 mg/kg/day for rabbits
`(prenatal mortality and malformations), and 452 mg/kg/day for mice (fetal weight reduction). The no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for
`developmental toxicity in these species were <78 mg/kg/day (rats), 125 mg/kg/day (rabbits), and 248 mg/kg/day (mice). With regard to maternal
`toxicity, the rat was the most sensitive (163 mg/kg/day), while both the mouse and rabbit showed maternal toxicity at 250 mg/kg/day. Thus,
`developmental toxicity occurred below maternally toxic levels in the rat, and only in the presence of maternal toxicity in mice or rabbits. - Environ
`Health Perspect 102(Suppl 7):107-112 (1994)
`Key words: boric acid, developmental toxicity, malformations, maternal toxicity, NOAEL
`
`Introduction
`Boric acid is a naturally occurring agent
`used in manufacturing processes and
`numerous consumer products (1-3). At
`high concentrations, boric acid is a repro-
`ductive toxicant in mice (4) and rats (5-7).
`While males appear to be the predominandy
`affected sex (4), other investigators have
`shown that pregnancy in mice can also be
`disrupted by boric acid exposure. A single
`dose of boric acid (500-3000 mg/kg) to
`mice on the first day of pregnancy disrupted
`pregnancy because of failure of blastulation
`in mice (2). There is also evidence that
`
`This paper was presented at the International
`Symposium on Health Effects of Boron and Its
`Compounds held 16-17 September 1992 at the
`University of California, Irvine, California.
`Address correspondence to Dr. J. J. Heindel,
`National Toxicology Program/National Institute of
`Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233
`(MD#3-03), Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
`Telephone (919) 541-0781. Fax (919) 541-4704 E-mail
`Heindel J@NIEHS.NIH.Gov
`3Current address: National Center for Toxicological
`Research, 3900 NCTR Rd., Jefferson AL 72079
`
`boric acid decreased ovulation in rats (3).
`Teratogenic effects such as rumplessness
`and microphthalmia have been reported in
`chick embryos treated with boric acid
`(8,9). There has been a report of increased
`malformations (especially congenital
`cataracts) among children of pregnant
`women who used boric acid as a topical
`antimicrobial agent (10).
`Because of the high industrial produc-
`tion of boric acid, the potential for human
`exposure to products containing boric acid,
`and data indicating the reproductive toxici-
`ty and possible developmental toxicity of
`boric acid, the National Toxicology
`Program (NTP) designed studies to define
`the potential for boric acid to cause devel-
`opmental toxicity in mice, rats, and rabbits.
`This was accomplished in studies in which
`the females were dosed orally with boric
`acid shortly after mating and continued
`until the day prior to natural parturition,
`or during any specific periods within this
`time frame. Both maternal and develop-
`mental toxicity end points were evaluated.
`
`Detailed reports of these studies are avail-
`able (11-13) and the studies in mice and
`rats have been published (14). A summary
`of the results of these three studies is pre-
`sented here.
`Materials and Methods
`Chemical Boric acid (CAS no. 10043-35-
`3) was determined to be 99% pure by
`infrared spectroscopy.
`Animals and Husbandry. Adult
`Caesarean-originated, barrier-sustained
`Crl:CD-1 (ICR) VAF / Plus outbred Swiss
`albino (CD-1) mice (Charles River
`Laboratories, Portage, MI); Crl:CD BR
`VAF/Plus outbred Sprague-Dawley (CD)
`rats (Charles River Laboratories, Raleigh,
`NC); and New Zealand rabbits (Hazelton
`Research Products, Denver, PA) were used
`for these studies (Table 1).
`Treatment. Time-mated rats or mice
`were given boric acid in the feed continu-
`ously from the morning of gestation day
`(gd) 0 to the morning of gd 20 (rats) or gd
`17 (mice) at doses of 0, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4%,
`
`Environmental Health Perspectives
`
`107
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`
`ANACOR EX. 2010 - 1/6
`
`

`
`HEINDEL ETAL.
`
`Table 1. Specific protocol.
`Species
`No. dams/group
`Mode of exposure
`Dosing interval
`Concentration in feed
`Dose/ unit body weight
`Termination
`
`Sprague-Dawley rat
`26-28
`Feed
`gd 0-20 (gd 6-15)
`0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, (0.8%)
`0, 78, 163, 330, 538 mg / kg / day
`gd 20
`
`Swiss CD 1 mice
`
`26-28
`Feed
`gd 0-17
`0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4%
`0, 248, 452, 1003 mg / kg / day
`gd 17
`
`New Zealand rabbit
`18-23
`Gavage
`gd 6-19
`
`0, 62.5, 125, 250 mg / kg / day
`gd 30
`
`Embryonal/Fetal Effects. Prenatal mor-
`tality was significantly increased in the
`0.8% dose group (36% resorptions per lit-
`ter) relative to the control group (4%
`resorptions per litter) that resulted in a
`decrease in live litter size. Significant
`increases in both the percentage of
`embryonic loss (resorptions) and late fetal
`deaths per litter contributed to the
`observed increase in prenatal mortality
`after exposure on gd 6 to 15. Average
`fetal body weight per litter was also
`reduced in all boric acid-treated groups,
`ranging from a 6 to 7% decrease at the
`lowest dose level to about a 50% decrease
`at the highest dose level. The percentage
`
`of malformed fetuses per litter and the
`percentage of litters containing at least
`one malformed fetus were increased at all
`doses studied. The incidence of litters
`with one or more fetuses with a skeletal
`malformation increased at 0.2 to 0.8%
`boric acid doses; the incidence of litters
`with one or more pups with a visceral or
`external malformation was increased at
`dosages of 0.4 and 0.8%, respectively. A
`variety of malformations was noted,
`including anomalies of the eyes, the cen-
`tral nervous system, the cardiovascular
`system, and the axial skeleton. The most
`commonly observed malformations in the
`0.4 and 0.8% dosage groups were
`
`Table 2. Summary of maternal and embryonal/fetal responses of Sprague-Dawley rats to boric acid administered
`on gestational days 0 to 20 or 6 to 15.
`
`Boric acid, mg / kg / day (% in feed)
`0-20
`163
`(0.2%)
`
`330
`(0.4%)
`
`78
`(0.1 %)
`
`6-15
`539
`(0.8%)
`
`Trend
`
`or from gd 6 through 15 (0.8% dose, rats
`only). Rabbits were artificially inseminated
`(15,16) and given boric acid by gavage
`(62.5, 125, or 250 mg/kg/day in distilled
`water) on gd 6 through 19 (Table 1).
`Administration of boric acid by gavage was
`chosen for the rabbit study because rabbits
`are erratic eaters.
`Evaluations. End points used to define
`maternal toxicity during boric acid treat-
`ment included food and water consump-
`tion, body weight, signs of toxicity, liver
`and kidney weights, kidney histology, and
`uterine weight. Animals were killed on gd
`17 (mice), gd 20 (rats), or gd 30 (rabbits).
`End Points. End points used to define
`developmental toxicity were embryonal / fetal
`weight and structural malformations and
`variations observed during examinations.
`Live fetuses were weighed and examined
`for malformations and variations by stan-
`dard techniques (17-20).
`Statistics. Statistical analysis of the data
`was made as described previously, using the
`litter as the statistical unit (11-14).
`Results
`Rau
`Maternal Effects. Summarizing across all
`exposure groups, maternal effects included
`increased relative liver and kidney weights
`at .0.2%, and decreased weight gain dur-
`ing treatment and gestation at .0.4%.
`Corrected body weight gain (i.e., gesta-
`tional weight gain minus the gravid uter-
`ine weight) was not affected, except for a
`significant increase when compared to the
`control group at 0.4% boric acid (Table
`1). Microscopic evaluation of maternal
`showed
`minimal
`kidney
`sections
`nephropathy in a few rats, but neither the
`incidence nor the severity of the changes
`was dose related. Exposure to boric acid
`from gd 0 to 20 resulted in increased food
`intake with no significant dose-related
`effect on water intake. Exposure to 0.8%
`boric acid resulted in decreased water and
`food intake early during the treatment
`period with a rebound increase in food
`intake on gd 15 to 18 and an apparent,
`but not significant, increase in water
`intake over this same period.
`
`Maternal
`Total treated
`Number removed
`Deaths
`Pregnancy rates, %
`Body weight before treatment
`Body weight change during treatment
`Body weight change, corrected
`Relative food consumption
`Clinical signs of toxicity
`Number corpora lutea /dam
`Gravid uterine weight
`Relative liver weight
`Relative kidney weight
`Renal pathology
`Embryonal /fetal
`% resorptions or fetal deaths /litter
`-
`-
`% litters with resorptions or deaths
`% litters with 100% prenatal mortality
`-
`Number live fetuses/ litter
`-
`4.
`Average female body weight/litter
`4.
`Average male body weight/ litter
`T
`% malformed fetuses/litter
`% litters with malformations
`TI
`T
`T
`All
`t
`-
`-
`-
`External
`T
`I
`-
`-
`Visceral
`1t
`1
`1
`T
`Skeletal
`T
`4
`4
`-
`% fetuses with variations /litter
`-
`4.
`4
`-
`-
`-
`% litters with variations
`a Arrows indicate direction of the trend or significant change from the control group (p<0.05). b Dashes indicate
`no significant change from control.
`
`4. a
`1'
`-
`
`-
`Jl
`1
`I
`
`29
`0
`0
`90
`-
`
`-
`1
`
`-
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`4.
`4.
`II
`
`29
`0
`0
`97
`
`-
`-
`
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`4
`4
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`
`I -
`
`29
`0
`0
`90
`-
`,j,,
`T
`
`-
`4.
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`4
`4
`
`14
`0
`0
`100
`-
`
`4.
`
`J1
`4
`
`1
`1
`T
`4
`4.
`4.
`1
`
`108
`
`Environmental Health Perspectives
`
`ANACOR EX. 2010 - 2/6
`
`

`
`DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY OF BORIC ACID
`
`Table 3. Summary of maternal and embryonal /fetal responses of CD-1 mice to boric acid administered on gesta-
`tional days 0 to 17.
`
`Boric acid, mg/ kg/ day (% in feed)
`452
`248
`(0.1 %)
`(0.2%)
`
`1003
`(0.4%)
`
`Trend
`
`28
`0
`0
`96
`
`_
`
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`1T
`
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`
`4-a
`
`-
`
`'1
`4,
`1
`I
`
`1
`-
`
`4-
`4-
`I
`
`Maternal
`Total treated
`Number removed
`Deaths
`Pregnancy rates, %
`Body weight before treatment
`Body weight change during treatment (gd 0-17)
`Body weight change (corrected)
`Relative food consumption )gd 0-17)
`Clinical signs of toxicity
`Number corpora lutea / dam
`Gravid uterine weight
`Relative liver weight
`Relative kidney weight
`Renal pathology
`Embryonal /fetal
`% resorptions or fetal deaths/litter
`% litters with resorptions or deaths
`% litters with 100% prenatal mortality
`Number live fetuses/litter
`Average female body weight/ litter
`Average male body weight/ litter
`% malformed fetuses / litter
`% litters with malformations
`All
`External
`Visceral
`Skeletal
`% fetuses with variations/litter
`4-
`4-
`-
`% litters with variations
`4-
`4,
`-
`a Arrow indicate direction of the trend or significant change from the control group )p<0.05). b Dashes indicate no
`significant change from control.
`
`29
`0
`0
`93
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`,l,
`1-
`-
`
`28
`0
`0
`93
`
`4
`
`4-
`4-
`1
`
`I
`
`enlarged lateral ventricles of the brain (0
`and 0.5% of the fetuses, respectively),
`and agenesis or shortening of the thir-
`teenth rib (6 and 45% of the fetuses,
`respectively) (Table 2).
`Mice
`Maternal Effects. Maternal toxicity associat-
`ed with boric acid treatment induded effects
`on body weight gain and organ weights.
`Maternal body weight was reduced below
`control values by 10 to 15% during late
`treatment in the high-dose group.
`Treatment with 0.4% boric acid also caused
`reductions in maternal weight gain during
`treatment, but weight gain corrected for
`uterine weight was not affected. Food and
`water intake were not affected. Gravid uter-
`ine weight was decreased at the high-dose
`level. At necropsy, pale kidneys were noted
`in several boric acid-treated dams, particu-
`larly in the high-dose group, and one dam
`treated with 0.4% boric acid had fluid accu-
`mulation in the kidney. Relative kidney
`weight was increased in the 0.4% group and
`microscopic examination of maternal kid-
`neys revealed a dose-related increase in the
`incidence of renal tubular dilatation (with or
`without regeneration), 0/ 10, 2/ 10, 8 /10
`and 10/10; control to high-dose group,
`respectively.
`Embryonal/Fetal Effects. boric acid
`treatment (0.1-0.4%) during gestation was
`not associated with preimplantation loss, the
`number of implantation sites per litter being
`comparable among treatment groups (Table
`3). However, boric acid treatment was asso-
`ciated with significant adverse postimplanta-
`tion effects, particularly in the high-dose
`group. The percentage of resorptions per lit-
`ter increased from 6% in the control group
`to 19% by exposure to 0.4% boric acid, and
`fetal body weight was reduced by 33% com-
`pared to controls. Treatment with 0.2%
`boric acid was also associated with a signifi-
`cant, but less severe, fetal body weight
`reduction of 11%.
`Boric acid also had effects on fetal mor-
`phologic development. The most frequent-
`ly observed malformations in the 0.4%
`boric acid-treated litters were skeletal
`defects, particularly short rib XIII (in the
`4% dosage-treated fetuses). In contrast, the
`occurrences of fetuses per litter with mal-
`formations were fewer in the low- and mid-
`dose group than in the control group. In
`particular, the incidence of full or rudi-
`mentary lumbar I rib(s) was observed less
`frequently in fetuses of boric acid-treated
`mice. The presence of a rib at lumbar I
`(classified as an anatomic variation in this
`species and strain) was decreased in a dose-
`
`related manner as follows: the incidence of
`a full rib(s) at lumbar I was 12, 8, 1, and
`1%, respectively, and the incidence of rudi-
`mentary lumbar I rib(s) was 16, 7, 3, and
`3%, respectively.
`Rabbits
`Maternal Effects. At 250 mg / kg / day,
`maternal food consumption was decreased
`during the first 10 days of treatment (gd
`6-15), was comparable among groups
`during the final days of treatment (gd
`15-19), and was increased during the peri-
`od immediately following treatment (gd
`19-25). It was also increased in both the
`125 and 250 mg/kg/day groups relative
`to controls during the final days of gesta-
`tion (gd 25-30). Maternal body weight
`(gd 9-30), weight during treatment, and
`gravid uterine weight were each decreased
`at 250 mg/kg/day. Corrected maternal
`weight change was increased at both 125
`and 250 mg/kg/day. Maternal relative
`liver weight was comparable among
`groups, while relative kidney weight was
`increased at 250 mg/kg/day. However,
`
`there was no histopathologic evidence for
`any boric acid-induced renal toxicity.
`Embryonal/Fetal Effects. No definitive
`evidence of developmental toxicity was
`observed following exposure of pregnant
`does to either 62.5 or 125 mg/kg/day
`boric acid during the period of major
`organogenesis (gd 6-19). At 250
`mg/kg/day, developmental toxicity
`included a high average-rate-of-resorption
`(90% of implants per litter vs 6% for con-
`trols), as well as a high percentage of does
`with complete prenatal loss (73% of litters
`vs 0% for controls) (Table 4). In contrast,
`the incidence of late fetal deaths was low in
`all groups (<2.8% per litter) and showed
`no systematic relationship to boric acid
`exposure. Average fetal body weight per lit-
`ter was 92% that of controls at the high
`dose, but this difference did not reach sta-
`tistical significance. In part, the absence of
`a significant fetal weight effect reflects the
`small sample size for this parameter (only
`six litters in the high-dose group survived
`to gd 30, as compared to 18 to 23 litters in
`the other study groups).
`
`Volume 102, Supplement 7, November 1994
`
`109
`
`ANACOR EX. 2010 - 3/6
`
`

`
`HEINDEL ETAL.
`
`Table 4. Summary of maternal and embryonal /fetal responses of New Zealand rabbits to boric acid administered
`on gestational days 6 to 19.
`
`Boric acid, mg / kg /day per os)
`62.5
`125
`
`Trend
`
`250
`
`Maternal
`Total treated
`Number removed
`Deaths
`Pregnancy rates, %
`Body weight before treatment (gd 0 or 6)
`Body weight change before treatment (gd 0-6)
`Body weight change during treatment
`(gd 6-9)
`(gd 9-19)
`Body weight change after treatment (gd 19-30)
`Body weight change (corrected)
`Relative food consumption
`(gd 0 to 6)
`(gd 6 to 19)
`(gd 19 to30)30
`Clinical signs of toxicity
`Number corpora lutea /dam
`Gravid uterine weight
`Relative liver weight
`Relative kidney weight
`Renal pathology
`Embryonal / fetal
`% resorptions or fetal deaths/ litter
`% litters with resorptions or deaths
`% litters with 100% prenatal mortality
`Number live fetuses/litter
`Average female body weight/ litter
`Average male body weight/ litter
`% malformed fetuses/litter
`% litters with malformations
`All
`External
`Visceral
`Skeletal
`Skeletal (cardiovascular)
`% fetuses with variations/litter
`% litters with variations
`aDashes indicate no significant change from control. bArrows indicate direction of the trend or significant change
`from the control group (p<0.05).
`
`23
`0
`0
`85
`_
`
`_
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-a
`
`b
`1
`4-
`
`4-
`
`4-
`
`-
`
`I
`-
`-
`4-
`
`1
`
`I
`
`20
`0
`0
`85
`_
`
`_
`-
`4-
`
`-
`
`4
`
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`22
`0
`0
`96
`_
`
`4
`4-
`4-
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`I
`1
`4-
`
`I
`
`I
`
`enlarged aorta in 0% (0/159), and 36%
`(5/14) of fetuses examined in control and
`high-dose groups, respectively.
`The percentage of fetuses with anatomi-
`cal variations was not significantly elevated
`above that of controls in any of the boric
`acid-exposed groups.
`Discussion
`Three mammalian species have been evalu-
`ated during gestation for developmental
`toxicity of boric acid at exposure levels
`which did not cause maternal mortality
`(Table 5). In all three species, boric acid
`was developmentally toxic to the develop-
`ing embryo /fetus. In two of the species,
`mice and rabbits, the developmental toxici-
`ty occurred at doses which were high
`enough to cause some maternal toxicity. In
`rats, minimal developmental toxicity (a 6%
`decrease in fetal weight) was measured at a
`dosage of 78 mg/kg/day in the absence of
`detectable maternal toxicity. In comparing
`the results of these three studies, it is
`important to note that the rat and mouse
`studies were feed studies, while the rabbit
`study was a gavage study. Extrapolating
`from the data of Treinen and Chapin (7),
`it is probable that the rodents reached
`steady-state blood and tissue levels of boric
`acid by the fourth day of exposure. While
`kinetic data following once-a-day gavage
`studies are not available, one would expect
`the profile of blood levels to be substantial-
`ly different from those of a feed study.
`Thus, while some of the dose levels
`(mg/kg/day) overlap, one cannot assume
`comparable exposures at critical target sites.
`Nonetheless, a comparison in Table 5
`shows that the lowest-observed-adverse-
`effect levels (LOAELs) for developmental
`toxicity were 78 mg/kg/day for rats (fetal
`weight reduction), 250 mg/kg/day for
`rabbits (prenatal mortality and malforma-
`tions) and 452 mg/kg/day for mice (fetal
`weight reduction). The no-observed-
`adverse-effect level (NOAELs) for develop-
`mental toxicity were <78 mg/kg/day
`(rats), 125 mg/kg/day (rabbits), and 248
`mg/kg/day (mice). Rabbits were the
`species most sensitive to boric acid-induced
`prenatal mortality and malformations,
`while mice were the most resistant, based
`on the doses and routes of administration
`employed in these studies.
`Boric acid treatment of rats and mice
`resulted in increased resorptions in the
`presence of normal numbers of implanta-
`tion sites, decreased fetal weights, and
`increased numbers of malformations. The
`predominant malformation in both species
`was agenesis, or shortening of the 13th rib,
`
`The overall incidence of malformed
`fetuses per litter was increased at 250
`mg/kg/day boric acid (81% per litter vs
`26% for controls), but not at 62.5 or 125
`mg/kg/day (26 and 30% per litter, respec-
`tively). When general classes of malforma-
`tions were analyzed, the percentage of
`fetuses per litter with either external or vis-
`ceral malformations was increased at the
`high dose, but the incidence of skeletal
`malformations was comparable among
`groups.
`External malformations were observed
`with the following incidence among indi-
`vidual fetuses in the control through high-
`dose groups, respectively: 0.6% (1/159),
`1.1% (2/175). 0.7% (1/153), and 14.3%
`(2/14). Although the overall incidence of
`external malformations was increased at the
`high dose of boric acid, distinctive
`
`dose-response patterns for individual mal-
`formations were not observed.
`The incidence of fetuses with visceral mal-
`formations was 8.2% (13/159), 6.3%
`(11/175), 7.8% (12/153), and 7.9%
`(11 /14) in the control through high-dose
`groups, respectively (Table 4). Malforma-
`tions of the cardiovascular (CV) system
`(great vessels and heart) were the most fre-
`quently observed abnormality. A post hoc
`analysis of CV malformations revealed a
`significant increase in the incidence of
`fetuses per litter with major CV defects at
`the high dose (72 vs 3% for controls). CV
`malformations whose incidence appeared
`to be elevated by boric acid exposure (espe-
`cially at the high dose) included interven-
`tricular septal defects in 0.6% of the con-
`trol-group fetuses examined (1 / 159), and
`57% (8 / 14) of the high-dose fetuses; an
`
`110
`
`Environmental Health Perspectives
`
`ANACOR EX. 2010 - 4/6
`
`

`
`Table 5. Comparison of results for boric acid exposure in pregnant rats, mice, and rabbits.
`Dose, mg /kg/daya
`Maternal effects
`Rat, feed
`78
`163
`
`NOAEL
`t food intake
`T liver and kidney weights
`1 food and water intake
`T liver and kidney weights
`I gestational weight gain
`T corrected weight gain
`1 food and water intake
`T liver and kidney weights
`4-treatment weight gain
`4- gestational weight gain
`
`1 renal lesions
`T renal lesions
`T renal lesions
`4 gestational weight gain
`T kidney weight
`I food and water intake
`
`330
`
`539
`
`Mice, feed
`248
`452
`1003
`
`Rabbits, gavage
`62.5
`125
`
`250
`
`NOAEL
`T weight gain (gd 0-30)
`T corrected weight gain
`T food intake (gd 25-30)
`4 weight gain (gd 6-19)
`T corrected weight gain
`T relative kidney weight
`T vaginal bleeding
`I food intake (gd 6-15)
`T food intake (gd 25-30)
`a The following routes and periods of exposure were used: rats (0.1, 0.2, 0.4% in feed on gd 0-20; 0.8% in feed on
`gd 6-15); mice (0.1, 0.2, 0.4% in feed on gd 0-17); rabbits by gavage 5 ml/kg on gd 6-19.
`
`Embryonal /fetal effects
`
`4-fetal weight
`4-fetal weight
`T fetuses malformed
`4 gravid uterine weight
`4-fetal weight
`T fetuses malformed
`
`4- gravid uterine weight
`4-fetal weight
`T prenatal mortality
`I fetuses malformed
`
`NOAEL
`4-fetal weight
`4 gravid uterine weight
`4-fetal weight
`T prenatal mortality
`T fetuses malformed
`
`NOAEL
`
`4- gravid uterine weight
`T totally resorbed litters
`1 prenatal mortality
`1 fetuses malformed
`
`DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY OF BORIC ACID
`
`36 or 76% resorptions, respectively, at
`539 mg/kg/day (gd 6-15) (14), or at
`617 mg/kg/day (gd 0-20) (NTP pilot
`study). In contrast, mice were relatively
`resistant to such effects, and showed only
`20% resorptions/litter after exposure to
`1003 mg/kg/day throughout gestation
`(gd 0-17) (15).
`With regard to maternal toxicity, the
`rat was the most sensitive
`(163
`mg/kg/day), while both the mouse and
`rabbit showed maternal toxicity at 250
`mg/kg/day. Kidney weight was increased
`in all three species, but histologic kidney
`lesions were detected only in the mouse
`study. Indeed, on the basis of kidney his-
`tology the maternal NOAEL was less than
`248 mg/kg/day.
`Conclusion
`In summary, boric acid caused develop-
`mental toxicity in three species: rat,
`mouse, and rabbit. Developmental toxici-
`ty occurs with doses of boric acid in the
`range of 80 to 400 mg/kg/day, given
`either throughout gestation or only dur-
`ing major organogenesis. Developmental
`toxicity manifests as decreased fetal body
`weight and increased malformations; pre-
`natal death, depending on the dose and
`species, usually occurs in the presence of
`maternal toxicity. These data must be
`interpreted with respect to the level of
`human exposure and sensitivity in order
`assess potential risk to human health. In
`this regard, recent studies have shown that
`the highest exposures to boron achieved as
`a result of dietary intake plus worker
`exposure were 0.38 mg boron/kg/day or
`approximately 1.9 mg/kg/day of boric
`acid (22).
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`REFERENCES
`Stockinger HE. The halogens and the
`nonmetals boron and silicon. In: Patty's
`Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 3rd
`rev ed, Vol 2B (Clayton GD, Clayton F
`eds). New York:Wiley, 1981;
`E,
`2937-3043.
`Beyer KH, Bergfeld WF, Berndt WO,
`Boutwell RK, Carlton WW, Hoffman
`DK, Schroeter AL. Final report on the
`safety assessment of sodium borate and
`boric acid. J Am Coll Toxicol 2(7):
`87-125 (1983).
`Siegel E, Wason S. Boric acid toxicity.
`Pediatr Clin North Am 33:363-367
`(1986).
`Fail PA, George JD, Seely JC, Grizzle
`TB, Heindel JJ. Reproductive toxicity of
`boric acid (BORA) in Swiss (CD-1)
`mice: assessment using the continuous
`breeding protocol. Fundam Appl Toxicol
`
`which occurred in the presence of reduced
`fetal weight and maternal toxicity. The
`increase in the number of enlarged lateral
`ventricles of the brain, as well as an increase
`in the number of wavy ribs (variation), was
`observed in rats, but these anomalies were
`observed in the presence of severe decreases
`in fetal weight. Indeed, decreases in fetal
`body weight comparable to those observed
`in the boric acid study have been reported
`following exposure of CD rats to carba-
`mazepine on gd 7 to 18 (21). Average fetal
`body weights were 80, 57, and 48% that of
`control weights for 200, 400, or 600
`mg / kg / day carbamazepine, respectively,
`but fetuses evaluated by Wilson's method
`(17) on gd 20 were not reported to have
`enlarged lateral ventricles or other related
`central nervous system malformations. This
`suggests that ventricular enlargement in gd
`20 rat fetuses following boric acid exposure
`is not simply a secondary expression of
`growth retardation.
`However, only 5% of the rat fetuses
`showed the enlarged lateral ventricles.
`
`Further studies (unpublished) have shown
`that the enlarged lateral ventricles were not
`produced when boric acid was dosed dur-
`ing only one of the sensitive periods for
`induction of brain malformations (i.e., gd
`14-17) suggesting that the effect of boric
`acid on lateral ventricles occurs before gd
`14. In contrast, the rabbit's cardiovascular
`system was clearly a target for boric acid
`exposure, since 72% of fetuses/litter (250
`mg/kg/day) had at least one major car-
`diovascular malformation, compared to
`only 3% for controls.
`Susceptibility to boric acid-induced
`prenatal mortality of the conceptus
`showed major differences across species
`despite comparable control values (4-6%
`of implants resorbed / litter). Rabbits were
`not only most sensitive to this effect, but
`were also the most severely affected
`species, experiencing 90% resorptions/lit-
`ter at 250 mg/kg/day (gd 6-19). The
`extent of prenatal mortality in rats
`depended upon both the daily dose and
`the period of administration. Rats showed
`
`Volume 102, Supplement 7, November 1994
`
`111
`
`ANACOR EX. 2010 - 5/6
`
`

`
`HEINDEL ETAL.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`17:225-239 (1991).
`5. Weir RJ, Fisher RS. Toxicologic studies on borax and boric acid.
`Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 12:351-364 (1972).
`Lee IP, Sherins RJ, Dixon RL. Evidence for induction of germinal
`aplasia in male rats by environmental exposure to boron. Toxicol
`Appl Pharmacol 45:577-590 (1978).
`Treinen KA, Chapin RE. Development of testicular lesions in male
`F344 rats after treatment with boric acid. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
`107:325-335 (1991).
`8. Schowing J, Cuevas P. Teratogenic effects of boric acid upon the
`chick. Macroscopic results. Teratology 12:334-338 (1975).
`9. Shepard TH. Catalog of Teratogenic Agents, 5th ed.
`Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986; 75-76.
`10. Heinonen OP, Slone D, Shapiro S. Birth Defects and Drugs in
`Pregnancy. Littleton, MA:Publishing Science Group, 1977;
`296-313.
`11. NTP. Developmental Toxicity Evaluation of Boric Acid (CAS no.
`10043-35-3) Administered to Sprague-Dawley Rats, Final Study
`Report. National Toxicology Program. NTIS #PB91137588/AS.
`1990.
`12. NTP. Developmental Toxicity Evaluation of Boric Acid (CAS No.
`10043-35-3) Administered to CD-1 Swiss Mice. National
`Toxicology Program. Final Study Report NTIS # PB91132332.
`1990.
`13. NTP. Developmental Toxicity Evaluation of Boric Acid (CAS no.
`10043-35-3) Administered to New Zealand White Rabbits by
`Gavage on Gestational Days 6 through 19. Final Study Report
`NTIS # PB92129550/AS. 1991.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`Heindel JJ, Price CJ, Field EA, Marr MC, Myers CB, Morrisey RE,
`Schwetz BA. Developmental toxicity of boric acid in mice and rats.
`Fundam Appl Toxicol 18:266-277 (1992).
`Breederman, PJ, Foote RH, Yassen AM. An improved artificial
`vagina for collecting rabbit semen. J Reprod Fertil 7:
`401-403 (1964).
`16. Hafez ESE (ed). Reproduction and Breeding Techniques for
`Laboratory Animals. Philadelphia:Lea and Febiger, 1970;273-298.
`17. Wilson JG. Embryological considerations in teratology. In:
`Teratology: Principles and Techniques (Wilson JG, Warkany J,
`eds). Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1965;251-277.
`Staples RE. Detection of visceral alterations in mammalian fetuses.
`Teratology 9:7 (1974).
`Stuckhardt JL, Poppe GM. Fresh visceral examination of rat and
`rabbit fetuses used in teratogenicity testing. Teratogenesis Carcinog
`Mutagen 4:181-188 (1984).
`20. Marr MC, Myers CB, George JD, Price CJ. Comparison of single
`and double staining for evaluation of skeletal development: The
`effects of ethylene glycol (ED) in CD rats. Teratology 34:
`476 (1988).
`21. Vorhees CV, Acuff DD, Weisenberger WP, Mink DR.
`Teratogenicity of carbamazepine in rats. Teratology 41:
`311-317 (1990).
`Culver BD, Shen PT, Taylor TH, Lee-Feldstein A, Anton-Culver
`H, Strong PL. The relationship of blood-and urine-boron to boron
`exposure in borax-workers, and the usefulness of urine-boron as an
`exposure marker. Environ Health Perspect 102(Suppl 7):
`133-137 (1994).
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`22.
`
`112
`
`Environmental Health Perspectives
`
`ANACOR EX. 2010 - 6/6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket