`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 59
`
`
`
` Entered: October 4, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS X LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ANACOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01776 (Patent 7,582,621 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01780 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01785 (Patent 7,767,657 B2) 1
`____________
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, and
`TINA E. HULSE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HULSE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are common to all three cases.
`We, therefore, issue a single order that has been entered in each case.
`Paper numbers refer to those filed in IPR2015-01776.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01776 (Patent 7,582,621 B2)
`IPR2015-01780 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`IPR2015-01785 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`
`
`According to our prior orders, oral argument is scheduled to be
`
`held in IPR2015-01776, IPR2015-01780, and IPR2015-01785 on
`
`November 3, 2016, if requested by the parties. Paper 25. Petitioner and
`
`Patent Owner have both requested oral argument in each case. Papers 58,
`
`52. The requests are granted.
`
`The oral argument will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time, on
`
`Thursday, November 3, 2016, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East,
`
`600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. The oral argument will be
`
`open to the public for in-person attendance, which will be accommodated on
`
`a first-come, first-served basis.2
`
`Each party will have 45 minutes to present arguments and may
`
`determine for itself how to divide the time between the three cases.
`
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s patent
`
`claims at issue are unpatentable. Therefore, at oral argument, Petitioner will
`
`proceed first to present its case with respect to the challenged patent claims
`
`and the grounds on which the Board instituted trial. Petitioner may reserve
`
`some of its argument time for rebuttal. Patent Owner will then respond to
`
`Petitioner’s initial presentation. Finally, Petitioner may use the time it has
`
`reserved to reply to Patent Owner’s presentation.
`
`
`
`2 We note that the hearing is currently scheduled to occur in Hearing
`Room B, which has a maximum number of eight publicly available spaces.
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01776 (Patent 7,582,621 B2)
`IPR2015-01780 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`IPR2015-01785 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`
`
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the oral argument, and the
`
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the oral argument.
`
`The hearing transcript will be entered in the record of this proceeding.
`
`The parties shall serve any demonstrative exhibits on opposing
`
`counsel at least five business days before the hearing. The parties shall also
`
`provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board no later
`
`than three business days before the hearing by emailing them to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. Notwithstanding 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), the parties shall
`
`not file any demonstrative exhibits in these proceedings without prior
`
`authorization from the Board.
`
`The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc.
`
`v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041
`
`(PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate
`
`content of demonstrative exhibits. The parties shall confer with each other
`
`regarding any objections to demonstrative exhibits. For any issue that
`
`cannot be resolved after conferring, the parties may each file a one-page list
`
`of objections at least three business days before the hearing. The list should
`
`identify with particularity which demonstrative exhibits are subject to
`
`objection and include a short statement of the reason for each objection. No
`
`argument or further explanation is permitted.
`
`The Board will consider the objections and schedule a telephone
`
`conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will reserve ruling on
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01776 (Patent 7,582,621 B2)
`IPR2015-01780 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`IPR2015-01785 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`
`the objections until after the oral argument. Any objection to demonstrative
`
`exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered waived.
`
`The parties are advised that at least one member of the panel will be
`
`attending the hearing from a remote location. The parties are reminded that
`
`the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative
`
`exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the hearing to
`
`ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript and the ability of
`
`the judge participating remotely to follow the presenter’s arguments.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at oral
`
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`
`whole or in part. If lead counsel for either party will not be in attendance at
`
`oral hearing, the Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference
`
`call no later than two business days before the oral hearing to discuss the
`
`matter.
`
`The parties may request the use of audio-visual equipment during the
`
`oral hearing. Formal requests are to be made five business days in advance
`
`of the hearing date and should be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is
`
`not timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01776 (Patent 7,582,621 B2)
`IPR2015-01780 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`IPR2015-01785 (Patent 7,767,657 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeffrey Blake
`jblake@merchantgould.com
`
`Kathleen Ott
`kott@merchantgould.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Andrea Reister
`areister@cov.com
`
`Enrique Longton
`elongton@cov.com
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`