throbber
United States Patent [19]
`Sun et al.
`
`US006042845A
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`6,042,845
`*Mar. 28, 2000
`
`54 ANTI FUNGAL TREATMENT OF NAILS
`
`P '
`y E ' —S
`l B
`rzmar xamzner amue arts
`
`[75] Inventors: Ying Sun, Somerville; Jue-Chen Liu,
`Neshanic; Elizabeth S. Kimbleton,
`princ?itoné Jonas C- T- Wang,
`Robbmsvlne’ an of NJ’
`[73] Assignee; Johnson & Johnson Consumer
`Products, Inc., Skillman, N].
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`There is disclosed a method for the treatment of fungal
`diseases in nails, Which comprises the topical administration
`to the nail and, if desired, also to the surrounding skin, of (1)
`a sulfhydryl containing amino acid or a derivative thereof,
`
`[ *1 Notice
`'
`
`the pharmaceutically acceptable salts or esters thereof, or
`This atent issued on a Continued ms
`stereoisomers thereof, (2) urea, (1) and (2) being adminis
`ecutiopn application ?led under 37 PCFR
`tered in an amount suf?cient to enhance the permeation of
`1,53(d), and is subject to the twenty year
`Patent term Provisions of 35 USC antifungal drugs through nail tissue, either prior to or,
`154(aX2)‘
`preferably, concurrently With the topical administration to
`[21] AppL NO‘: 08/922,041
`the nail of (3) an effective amount of an antifungal drug.
`'
`Th'ld'ldbdgdpdfhp'l
`ere 1s aso 1scose a an a e a ate ort e to ica
`[22] Flled:
`administration of medication to the nail, said bandage com
`prising a T-shaped adhesive backing, and a ?exible pad
`having an impervious backing and a nail-shaped cavity
`backed by said impervious backing, Wherein said nail
`shaped cavity contains absorptive means having absorbed
`therein urea and a sulfhydryl Containing amino acid or a
`derivative thereof, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or
`ester thereof, or a stereoisomer thereof.
`
`Sep‘ 2’ 1997
`Related US Application Data
`
`[63] g’tntglgagzggflzgplication Now/361741371360 22’ 1994’
`'
`'7’
`’
`'
`........................ .. A61L 15/16
`[51] Int. Cl. ..
`ffijtgséaszf
`[52] US‘
`’
`514/252 562
`’
`[58] Field of Searc’h
`514/588, 946, 947, 953, 399; 424/446,
`447, 448
`
`5 Claims, 17 Drawing Sheets
`
`CFAD Exhibit 1005
`
`1
`
`

`
`/0
`
`543240,
`
`_..G_u_
`
`s5_:o>zon_m_
`
`2
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 2 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`Q§§$8
`
`14v
`
`III
`
`335$? 3
`
`
`
`mezgjnxow I 3
`
`|mT I m:
`
`8 mQQvmMOMmNQNmFEm o _ _ _ _ r _ _ _ _
`
`. E8152;
`
`m .GE
`
`# E
`
`w. P
`
`m;
`
`mé
`
`so co
`
`3
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 3 of 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`I.\\\\\\\\\\\\‘
`
`
`
`(48HRS,320,n=3)
`
`FORMULATIO
`
`|&\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\' 0
`vs
`
`>-
`
`(D
`
`Z 9 '
`
`<':_I
`
`D EI
`
`I 0L <[
`
`I
`'2
`
`Z (
`
`5 Z_
`
`I
`_I
`LIJ
`3CD
`
`3%:
`
`5<Z
`
`%OFINITIALNAILWEIGHT
`
`(X100)
`
`4
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 4 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`
`
`022 02 oz_zoEE<n_ HON/‘200E:
`
`5 u c 6% .mm: mi
`
`
`
`Now Now
`
`% /
`
`mdm
`///////
`
`mdm
`
`§/////
`Qmm
`
`5
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 5 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`3" C 6% .mm: mi
`
`mim
`
`\\\\\\\\
`\ \\\\
`\\\\
`ago/‘oz,
`
`mé
`
`m6
`
`mN
`
`m;
`
`m6
`
`mw ._0_n_
`
`6
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 6 of 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`I'’/////////;
`
`NOACNOUFORMULATION
`NOAC&U
`
`g\\\\\\‘
`
`0ssssss
`
`05
`
`04
`
`02
`
`CONCJNNAK(mg/9)03
`
`ITRACONAZOLE
`
`='
`<2
`
`2 OI
`
`- Z 6
`
`%
`Z‘?Z
`QC
`
`352
`LLJI
`<33
`
`M<
`
`2Z O % t
`
`7
`
`

`
`O
`
`(D5:
`
`8
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 8 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`m.mm
`
`7/%////
`
`//
`
`Qwm
`
`S" C 6% .wm: mi
`
`/ 7%
`
`DwO<OZ
`
`w
`
`3
`
`m
`
`QN
`
`m;
`
`m6
`
`pm .GE
`
`9
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 9 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`Us
`2
`Q S0
`
`FIG. 6a
`
`A
`
`Ell-lo
`E332 V
`
`10
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 10 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`Ohm
`
`Qmm
`
`/ Qww
`
`11
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28, 2000
`
`Sheet 11 of 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`
`
`m_._ON<ZOO=>_<Z_wz_.:m>>m.=<Z
`
`
`
`ZO_._.<.=..S_mOu_m_._.<m._._Z
`
`
`
`wzmfizoo4_<zm:<E_zm:oN<zoo_s_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.__<zom_+<mEz:zoom_m<mwas8.8
`
`
`
`.__<zoE<m_Ezon_m_m<m99:5.2
`
`aéem_>__+
`
`mmN
`
`om.
`
`2:
`
`._<_.:Z_Q0
`
`
`
`._.IO_m>>.=<Z
`
`12
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 12 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`1 if
`
`N mm @ mm m mw v Qm m
`.F _ i _ l _ .F _ F
`
`In
`
`n I m
`
`+
`
`|+
`
`wmzi
`
`lml
`
`mm: mm:
`
`E16 1 w
`
`N
`
`I m
`
`l w
`
`I w
`
`m .GE
`
`wwz<zo
`50m; Q,
`
`69%
`
`13
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`00020092LaM
`
`Sheet 13 of 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`
`
`.__<z:w:om_.:zoEm_s_mmn_m_._oN<zoo<E_
`
`
`
`
`
`35+o><_muzV
`
`3
`
`$29m_s_:
`
`m:oN<zoo<E_
`
`AmEo\m:VmoEm_om_mz_
`
`14
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 14 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`IOPnmOwI 2_
`
`mm;
`
`on E
`
`I;
`
`- 8
`
`- 8
`
`- E
`
`- 8
`
`1 2‘
`
`- 8
`
`- 8
`
`- 2
`
`o
`
`.59
`
`r 8 owEwEmwu
`aeoai
`
`w._oN<zoo<E_
`
`o2
`
`15
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 15 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`
`
`Om iEmE 65¢ I.I|
`
`Om i_n_mm_ 69¢ ‘ml
`
`mm
`
`om mp or m c
`
`ooom
`
`| ooom
`
`I ooow
`
`.. ooom
`
`| oooN
`
`| coop
`
`16
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 16 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`IOPnEOmE z_
`
`Qmi dot“
`
`///
`
`ONE .omn
`
`ZOFSDEEOm
`
`Qmi dhw
`
`w?
`
`2
`
`QF
`
`NP
`
`m_. .GE
`
`OWENS-Ema
`
`ANEQBEV
`
`17
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Mar. 28,2000
`
`Sheet 17 0f 17
`
`6,042,845
`
`FIG. 13A
`
`18
`
`

`
`6,042,845
`
`2
`reaction that occurs betWeen the disul?de bonds in nail
`keratin and a thiol-containing compound (in this case,
`cysteine) is shoWn in the folloWing scheme:
`
`1
`ANTI FUNGAL TREATMENT OF NAILS
`
`This is a continuation, of application Ser. No. 08/361,
`413, ?led Dec. 22, 1994, Which is hereby incorporated by
`reference now US. Pat. No. 5,696,164.
`The invention relates to a method for the topical treat
`ment of fungal diseases in nails, and more particularly, to a
`composition and a method for enhancing the permeation rate
`of antifungal agents in nails. The invention also relates to a
`bandage adapted for use With the method of the invention.
`
`5
`
`CO
`
`CO 3
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Although signi?cant progress has been made in the devel
`opment of antifungal drugs, nail fungal infection (e.g.,
`onychomycosis) remains a disease most difficult to treat.
`The target sites for the treatment of onychomycosis reside in
`the nail plate, nail bed and nail matrix (see FIG. 1). Topical
`treatment has not been effective because antifungal drugs
`cannot readily penetrate the nail plate to reach the infection
`sites under the nail. Oral administration of antifungal drugs
`is the only effective Way to treat onychomycosis, Which has
`limited the use of some of the more potent antifungal drugs
`such as itraconaZole and ketoconaZole because of concern
`for possible side effects. It has been shoWn, hoWever, that if
`the nail barrier can be overcome or eliminated, topical
`antifungal drug treatment can be effective. For example,
`both miconaZole and ketoconaZole Were demonstrated to be
`effective in topically treating onychomycosis after nail avul
`sion. There is a need for a methodology for topical nail
`fungal treatment that does not require removal of the nail.
`Such topical treatment Would then permit the use of the more
`potent antifungal drugs in the treatment of fungal-infected
`nails.
`
`The nail plate is too thick and too dense for drugs to
`penetrate at a practical rate. Although nail is similar to
`stratum corneum of the skin in that it is derived from
`epidermis, it is mainly composed of hard keratin (highly
`disul?de-linked) and is approximately 100-fold thicker than
`stratum corneum. In order to deliver a sufficient amount of
`drug into the nail plate, the permeability of the nail plate to
`the drug needs to be enhanced. The permeation-related
`properties of the nail differ from those observed in stratum
`corneum primarily in three respects: (a) the total lipid
`content of the nail is much less than the lipid content of
`stratum corneum; (b) the nail has a high sulphur content
`(cystine) in its hard keratin domain Whereas the stratum
`corneum does not; (c) under average conditions, the nail
`contains much less Water than the stratum corneum.
`
`The chemical composition of nail and experimental evi
`dence indicate that the aqueous pathWay plays a dominant
`role in drug penetration into nail. Water is the principal
`plasticiZer for the nail. Upon being hydrated, hard nail plates
`become softer and more ?exible. Nail hydration is in?u
`enced by many factors, such as solution pH and certain
`chemicals. Keratolytic agents, such as urea and salicylic acid
`are often used to soften nail plates. Urea and a combination
`of urea and salicylic acid Were reported to be used for
`nonsurgical avulsion of nail dystrophies in clinical studies
`prior to topical treatment of onychomycosis With satisfac
`tory results.
`Nail plates have high sulphur content in the form of
`disul?de bonds. Certain reducing agents, e.g., cysteine or a
`derivative thereof, can break the disul?de bond in keratin to
`increase the ability of the nail to hydrate. The chemical
`
`15
`
`25
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`This invention provides a delivery means for topical
`treatment of fungal diseases of the nail Which delivers an
`effective dose of drug to (a) the diseased nail plate (and
`consequently, the underlying nail bed), of Which the hydra
`tion capability has been signi?cantly increased to enhance
`drug permeability (nail route); and (b) the surrounding skin
`tissues, including nail bed and matrix via the eponychium
`and hyponychium (skin route—see FIG. 1).
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention provides a method for the treatment of
`fungal diseases in nails, Which comprises the topical admin
`istration to the nail and, if desired, also to the surrounding
`skin, of (1) a sulfhydryl containing amino acid or a deriva
`tive thereof, the pharmaceutically acceptable salts or esters
`thereof, or stereoisomers thereof, (2) urea, (1) and (2) being
`administered in an amount sufficient to enhance the perme
`ation of antifungal drugs through nail tissue, either prior to
`or, preferably, concurrently With the topical administration
`to the nail of (3) an effective amount of an antifungal drug.
`The invention also provides a composition comprising (1),
`(2) and (3), as described above.
`The invention further provides a bandage adapted for the
`topical administration of medication to the nail, said ban
`dage comprising a T-shaped adhesive backing, and a ?exible
`pad having an impervious backing and a nail-shaped cavity
`backed by said impervious backing, Wherein said nail
`shaped cavity contains absorptive means having absorbed
`therein urea and a sulfhydryl containing amino acid or a
`derivative thereof, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or
`ester thereof, or a stereoisomer thereof.
`
`THE PRIOR ART
`
`65
`
`The reduction reaction betWeen keratin disul?de bonds
`and thioglycolates are frequently utiliZed in the cosmetic
`industry, e.g., for cold Waving and depilatory of hair, and
`enhancing cosmetic appearance of the nail.
`
`19
`
`

`
`3
`Olthoff et al., in EP 440298 A1, disclose the use of
`sulfur-containing amino acid derivatives in topical prepara
`tions for treatment of nail diseases such as onychomycosis.
`KaWase et al (EP 472858 A2 Mar. 4, 1992) describe a hair
`treatment composition containing siloXanes and penetration
`enhancers such as ammonium thioglycolate, Which gives the
`treated hair a good gloss and a reduced number of hair splits.
`Puri (WO 8600013 A1 Jan. 3, 1986) discloses that the
`condition of hair, skin and nails is improved by treatment
`With an aqueous ammonium thioglycolate solution, folloWed
`by treatment With a protein hydrolyZate.
`Rothman (WO 8907930 A1 Sep. 8, 1989) describes a
`storage-stable protein-containing composition and a method
`for treating keratinous tissues. The protein-containing com
`position contains reducing agents such as ammonium
`thioglycolate. The composition is said to be useful for
`conditioning horny keratinous tissues of mammals such as
`human hair and nail, and the hooves and fur of animals, to
`improve their strength and appearance and to promote hair
`and nail groWth.
`An enhanced transdermal drug permeation in rats has
`been reported for theophylline
`Kushida et al., Chem.
`Pharm. Bull., 32, 1 (1984) 268—274] and insulin
`Sun et
`al., Ann. NeW York Academy of Sciences, 1990, 596; Y. Sun
`et al., Proceed. Intern. Sym. Control. Rel. Bioactive Mat., 17
`(1990) 202; and J. C. Liu et al., in Drug Permeation
`Enhancement: Theory and Applications, p247—272, (D. S.
`Hsieh, Ed.) Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1994] by pretreating the
`skin With aqueous calcium thioglycolate solution. On the
`other hand, direct addition of calcium thioglycolate into an
`ointment containing the calcium salt of indomethacin dra
`matically decreased the absorption of the drug [T. Ogiso et
`al., J. Pharmcobio-Dyn., 9 (1986) 517—525].
`Konno et. al. (EP 152281 A2 Aug. 21, 1985) describes a
`transdermal formulation of nicardipine hydrochloride con
`taining urea and thioglycol.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1 shoWs the treatment target sites of a fungus
`infected nail;
`FIG. 2 is a graph displaying the effect of area on nail
`sWelling using aqueous urea solutions of various concentra
`tions at pH 4.5;
`FIG. 3a is a graph shoWing comparisons of the nail
`sWelling enhancement among several thiol-containing
`amino acid and analogs after nail clippings Were immersed
`in the formulation at 32° C. for 48 hours;
`FIG. 3b is a graph shoWing comparisons of the partition
`ing of itraconaZole into nail among several thiol-containing
`amino acid and analogs after nail clippings Were immersed
`in the formulation at 32° C. for 48 hours;
`FIGS. 4a, 5a and 6a are graphs shoWing the effect of
`N-acetyl-1-cysteine and urea on nail sWelling in different
`formulations;
`FIGS. 4b, 5b and 6b are graphs shoWing the effect of
`N-acetyl-1-cysteine and urea on itraconaZole partitioning
`into nail in different formulations;
`FIG. 7 is a graph shoWing nail sWelling and miconaZcle
`nitrate partitioning into nail in a miconaZole nitrate cream
`formulation;
`FIG. 8 is a graph shoWing the nail sWelling—pH pro?le
`With nail clippings immersed in a formulation containing
`urea, propylene carbonate, propylene glycol, N-acetyl-1
`cysteine and Water, at differing pH values;
`FIG. 9 is a graph shoWing the permeation pro?les of
`itraconaZole from three formulations With various compo
`sitions;
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6,042,845
`
`4
`FIG. 10 is a graph shoWing the amount of itraconaZole
`penetrated through the nail plate, as Well as the amount
`retained in the nail plate, for three different formulations;
`FIG. 11 is a graph shoWing the permeation pro?le of
`miconaZole nitrate through the nail plate for three formula
`tions;
`FIG. 12 is a graph that shoWs the amount of miconaZole
`nitrate penetrated through the nail plate, as Well as the
`amount retained in the nail plate, for three formulations; and
`FIG. 13 shoWs three vieWs of a device designed for
`topical drug delivery to nails.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`The invention relates to a method for the treatment of
`fungal diseases in nails, Which comprises the topical admin
`istration to the nail of (1) a sulfhydryl containing amino acid
`or a derivative thereof, the pharmaceutically acceptable salts
`or esters thereof, or stereoisomers thereof, (2) urea, (1) and
`(2) being administered in an amount suf?cient to enhance the
`permeation of antifungal drugs through nail tissue, either
`prior to or, preferably, concurrently With the topical admin
`istration to the nail of (3) an effective amount of an anti
`fungal drug.
`The term “nail” means the horny cutaneous plate on the
`dorsal surface of the distal end of a ?nger or toe. FIG. 1 is
`a schematic diagram shoWing the basic anatomic structure of
`human nail and its surrounding tissues. The topical antifun
`gal drug treatment for nail fungal disease (onychomycosis)
`contemplated by this invention is intended to deliver anti
`fungal drug to the nail plate (the stratum corneum unguis)
`and to the nail bed (the modi?ed area of epidermis beneath
`the nail, over Which the nail plate slides as it groWs) through
`the nail plate. Desirably, antifungal drug is also concurrently
`administered to the nail matrix (the proXimal portion of the
`nail bed from Which groWth chie?y proceeds) and nail bed
`through the skin of the eponychium (commonly called the
`cuticle) and the hyponychium (the thickened epidermis
`underneath the free distal end of the nail).
`The topical treatment of the invention may be employed
`in combination With systemic treatment With an antifungal
`drug such as griseofulvin or other antifungal drug that can be
`given orally over long periods of time, either concurrently
`during the entire systemic treatment regimen, or concur
`rently during a portion (usually the latter phase) of the
`systemic treatment regimen, or folloWing such systemic
`treatment.
`The fungal diseases of the nail that can be treated in
`accordance With the invention are those that are called
`“onychomycosis”, Which is usually an infection by Epider
`mophyton ?occosum, several species of Trichophyton, or
`Candida albicans.
`The antifungal drugs that can be used in the invention
`include miconaZole nitrate, ketoconaZole, itraconaZole,
`?uconaZole, econaZole, terconaZole, saperconaZole,
`amorol?ne, ciclopiroX, oXiconaZole, clotrimaZole,
`terbina?ne, nafti?ne, and other antifungal drugs that are
`available in a topical formulation. The preferred antifungal
`drugs for use in the process of the invention are itraconaZole,
`ketoconaZole and miconaZole nitrate. If desired, the topical
`formulation containing the antifungal drug may include an
`agent such as hydroXypropyl-[3-cyclodeXtrin that enhances
`the Water-solubility of the antifungal drug, in order to better
`utiliZe the aqueous pathWay through the nail, as discussed
`above. The anti-fungal drugs are used in anti-fungally effec
`tive amounts. For example, anti-fungally effective amounts
`
`20
`
`

`
`6,042,845
`
`5
`are usually from about 0.5% to about 10%, by weight, and
`preferably from about 1% to about 5%, by weight, of the
`formulation that is applied to the nail or surrounding dermal
`tissue.
`
`Urea is employed in the invention. It is believed that
`urea’s principal contribution to the efficacy of the formula-
`tion used in tlie invention is to inhibit the nail keratin from
`returning to its original densely packed cross—linked state
`(such return to the original densely packed cross—linked state
`would be caused by oxidation from the oxygen in the
`atmosphere), so that the nail remains more permeable to the
`antifungal drug over a longer period of time. (The ability of
`urea to inhibit the nail keratin from returning to its original
`densely packed cross—linked state probably stems from
`urea’s ability to disrupt non—covalent interactions in nail
`keratin.) One beneficial effect of the use of urea is that the
`sulfhydryl-containing amino acid or derivative thereof can
`be used in a lower concentration, thereby reducing (although
`probably not eliminating) the potential of the amino acid or
`derivative thereof for irritation of the skin.
`
`The invention employs a sulfhydryl containing amino
`acid or a derivative thereof, the pharmaceutically acceptable
`salts or esters thereof, or stereoisomers thereof. Such com-
`pounds can be represented by Formula (I):
`
`Hs—(CH2),,
`
`H——R
`NHRi
`
`(1)
`
`the pharmaceutically acceptable salts or esters thereof,
`and stereoisomers thereof,
`wherein:
`
`R=H, CONHCHZCOOH, NH2 or COORZ wherein R2
`is H or C1_4alkyl;
`R1=H, COCH3, CONH2, or CO(CH2)mCH(NH2)
`(COOH) wherein m is 1 or 2; and
`n=a number having a value of from 1 to 4.
`Illustrative examples of compounds of Formula (I)
`include those shown in the following table:
`
`TABLE 1
`
`Cysteine (1-cysteine, d-cysteine, d1-cysteine)
`
`IISTCII2—CIITCOOII
`
`NH;
`
`N-Acetyl-1-cysteine
`
`HSTCH2—CH—COOH
`NH
`
`(|:OCH3
`d1-Homocysteine
`
`IIS:CII2—CII2—CII:COOII
`
`NI-I1
`
`1-Cysteine methyl ester (methyl cysteine)
`
`IIS—CII2—CIIiCOOCII2
`
`NH;
`
`6
`
`TABLE l—continued
`
`1-Cysteine ethyl ester (ethyl cysteine)
`
`HS:CHg—CH'—COOCHzCH3
`
`NI-I2
`
`N-Carbamoyl cysteine
`
`HS:CH2—CH: COOH
`NI-I
`
`Co—NH2
`
`Glu ta thione
`
`cnZ—sn
`
`Hc—Co.\IHcH2CooH
`
`NHCOCH2CH2CHNH2
`COOH
`
`Cysteamine
`HS—CHZ—CH2—NH2
`
`The preferred compounds for use in the invention are
`N-acetyl-1-cysteine and cysteine.
`The urea and the sulfhydryl-containing amino acid or
`derivative thereof are employed in amounts sulficient to
`enhance the permeation of antifungal drugs through nail
`tissue. Thus, the topical composition that is applied to the
`nail will ordinarily contains from about 1% to about 50%,
`and preferably from about 5% to about 20%, (by weight)
`urea, and from about 0.1% to about 40%, and preferably
`from about 3% to about 20%, (by weight) of the sulfhydryl-
`containing amino acid or derivative thereof, the percentages
`being based upon the total weight of the fomiulation being
`applied to the nail. The pH range of the formulation is
`usually from about pH 2 to pH 10, and preferably from about
`pH 3 to pH 8.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`a. Effect of Nail Penetration Enhancers on Nail Swelling and
`Drug Partitioning into Nail
`The ability of a drug in a formulation to penetrate nail
`plate should be reflected by the rate and extent of the nail
`uptake of the formulation (i.e., nail swelling in the
`formulation), as well as by the amount of the drug migration
`into the nail (drug partitioning into nail). In vitro experi-
`ments were conducted to examine the e ect of drug formu-
`lation containing nail penetration enhancer on nail swelling
`and drug partitioning.
`The experimental procedure was the following: Clean
`human nail clippings were equilibrated to a constant weight
`by placing them in a desiccator over saturated CaCl2~6II2O
`solution (29% relative humidity at room temperature) for at
`least 48 hours before use. Approximately 30 mg of human
`nail clippings were weighed into a glass vial. The exact
`initial weight was recorded. Four grams of the test formu-
`lation (pre-warmed to 32° C.) was added into the vial and
`maintained at 32° C. under stirring in a Heating/Stirring
`Module (Reacti—Therm III, Pierce). The changes in nail
`weights were monitored at predetermined intervals over 48
`hours. At the end ofthe swelling experiment, the nail sample
`was rinsed with a mixture of N,N—dimethylformamide and
`methanol ( 1:1)
`to remove surface-bound drug. The nail
`
`21
`
`

`
`6,042,845
`
`7
`sample was then digested, and the drug concentration in nail
`was determined by high pressure liquid chromatography
`method as described by Badcock and Davies, Assay of
`itraconazole in nail clippings by reversed phase, high per-
`formance liquid chromatography, Ann. Clin. Biochem, 27
`(1990) 506-508.
`Several terms were used to describe the data. The nai
`swelling was expressed by the percentage of the initial nai
`weight (i.e., 100% of the initial nail weight means no
`swelling, and 200% means a nail swelling doubling the
`original weight, etc). An enhancement factor is used to show
`the increase in nail swelling due to the presence of nai
`penetration enhancer in comparison to the control, which
`were calculated according to the formula: enhancemen
`factor=(”/n weight gain of the test nail sample)/(% wcigh
`gain of control nail sample, i.e., no enhancer & urea in the
`formulation). Similarly,
`the enhancement factor for
`the
`enhanced itraconazole partitioning into nail is defined as:
`enhancement factor=(drug concentration in the test nai
`sample)/(drug concentration in the control nail sample). The
`drug concentration in nail was calculated by dividing the
`amount of the drug in nail (mg) by the weight of the initia
`nail clipping (i.e., dry nail weight in gram). This expression
`of drug nail concentration is used herein unless specifiec
`otherwise.
`The effect of urea on nail swelling was investigated, using
`aqueous urea solutions of various concentrations at pH 4.5.
`The graph shown as FIG. 2 shows that as urea concentration
`increased from 20% to 40%, nail hydration increased from
`30% to 50%. For this reason, it is believed that the use of
`urea alone will not cause significant enhancement of drug
`permeation through the nail.
`TABLE I, above, shows the names and chemical struc-
`tures of the thiol-containing amino acids and derivatives
`thereof that were investigated. To examine the eflects of
`these nail penetration enhancers on nail swelling and drug
`
`8
`itraconazole and miconazole nitrate
`partitioning, several
`formulations were prepared with an enhancer in each for-
`mulation (TABLE 2, below, displays the formulations). In
`the control experiment, there was no penetration enhancer
`(“E”) or urea (“U”) in the formulation. In the experiments
`discussed below,
`the following abbreviations and com-
`pounds were used:
`Ac Cyst=N-acetyl-1-cysteine
`Cysteine=1—cysteine
`Homocyst=d1-homocysteine
`Cysteam=cysteamine
`MethylCy=1-cysteine methyl ester
`EthylCyst=l-cysteine ethyl ester
`Itra=itraconazole
`
`Repl:nd=replenished every n days
`SA=salicylic acid (keratolytic agent; pH control)
`PG=propylene glycol (solvent)
`PC=propylene carbonate (solvent)
`EDTA=etl1yler1edian1ine tetraacetic acid (disodium salt—
`chelating agent)
`KLUCEL=hydroxypropylcellulose thickener)
`BHT=butylated hydroxy toluene (anti—oxidant)
`Mic.Nit.=miconazole nitrate
`
`BHA=Butylated hydroxyanisole
`Labrifil M 1944 CS=Unsaturated polyglycolized glycer-
`ides obtained by partial alcoholysis of apricot kernel oil,
`consisting of glycerides and polyethylene glycol esters—an
`amphiphilic oil, solvent and/or emulsifier.
`TEFOSE 63=Ethylene glycol and polyoxyethylene glycol
`palmitostearate; CTFA adopted name is PEG 6 stearate (and)
`PEG-32 stearate (and) glycol stearate—a non-ionic self-
`emulsifying base for oil/water emulsioned preparations.
`
`FORMULATIONS
`
`IN WEIGHT‘ %
`
`TABLE 2
`
`ENPLXNCER
`
`ITRA ENHANCER SA UREA PC
`
`PG
`
`0
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`
`(.3VA
`
`I»(4)u.U|
`L»>(..)bJU|U|Ut
`
`
`
`U~)l.A)(2~)(r)b~)b~1l.m)(A~)bJ(r)v)(2~)§NUI‘.l|UIU|U|Vt’J|U|VtU|'J|UIU|
`
`-J:-.l>-J:.l:-_cr\_o_a\_<:\<:CJC><3.J>..J>.J>.¢>..J:-J>-tsUIUVJIUI
`
`‘IIan0
`Lnuum
`
`kII‘.I|UIOU\U\’J\®<3C>C>®UI
`
`moounutooutunoounLnUnutunun<:
`
`vi
`
`-40-5
`No E&U
`-33-3
`Ac Cyst
`-34-1
`Cysteine
`-34-2
`Homocyst
`5 -34-3
`Cysteam
`-34-4
`MelhylCy
`' -34-5
`EthylCys
`5 -40-1
`No Ac&U
`5 -40-2
`No AL:
`-40-3
`No U
`-23
`Ac-#23
`5 -40-4
`No Ac&U
`-33-1
`‘.70 No Ac
`-33-2
`No U
`5 -26
`Ac-#26
`-40-5
`No Ac&U
`805--33-4
`No Ac
`8054 -33-5
`No U
`8054-33-3
`Ac-#33-3
`ITRACONAZOLE
`NAIL Pl:'RMEAl'I()l\
`
`’
`
`Repl:3d
`Replzld
`Repl:1d
`
`2138-41
`2138-136
`2138-137
`
`EDTA BHT KLCCEL
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`0.05
`
`OOOOOGOOCOOOOOOCOOC
`
`H20
`47.85
`27.85
`27.85
`27.85
`27.85
`27.85
`27.85
`51.85
`31.85
`46.85
`26.85
`45.35
`30.35
`35.35
`25.35
`47.85
`32.85
`37.85
`27.85
`
`TOTAL
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`98
`
`2435*
`26.85
`30.85
`
`100
`100
`100
`
`22
`
`

`
`6,042,845
`
`FORMULATIONS
`
`TABLE 2—continued
`
`IN WEIGI-IT %
`
`ENHANCER
`
`ITRA ENHANCER SA UREA PC
`
`PG
`
`EDTA BHT KLUCEL
`
`MICONAZOLE NITRATE
`NAIL PERMEATION
`
`2138-69
`2138-70
`2138-70
`
`Rcpl:3d
`Repl:3d
`Repl:7d
`‘Includes 0.1% ascorbic acid.
`
`FIG. 3a shows a comparison of the nail swelling enhance-
`ment effect and FIG. 3b shows a comparison of the itra-
`conazole partitioning enhancement effect of the thiol-
`containing amino acids and derivatives thereof of nail
`clippings after immersion in the test formulations at 32° C.
`for 48 hours.
`the thiol-
`The results in the FIG. 3a show that all
`containing amino acid and derivatives thereof investigated
`increased nail swelling in the itraconazole formulations,
`with the enhancement factors ranging from 1.82 to 4.57. The
`highest nail swelling enhancement was found with
`l—cysteine, followed by N—acetyl—l—cysteine and cysteamine.
`As shown in FIG. 3b, tl1e sanie rank order was observed
`among the penetration enhancers for their ability in enhanc-
`ing itraconazole partitioning into nail. The drastic increase in
`itraconazole migration into the nafl (approximately 100-
`fold) indicates that incorporation of the penetration enhancer
`into a topical itraconazole formulation will definitely facili-
`tate the antifungal drug reaching its target sites in the nail
`plate and the nail bed.
`The graphs displayed in FIGS. 441-60 and 417-619 show the
`elfect of N-acetyl-1-cysteine as penetration enhancer, and
`
`urea as adjuvant synergist on the nafl swelling and itracona-
`zole partitioning. The compositions of the formulations are
`tabulated in Table 3, below. All three itraconazole formula-
`tions contain 1% itraconazole, 5% N—acetyl—1—cysteine, and
`di erent concentration of urea and other components. The
`pH of these formulations was adjusted to 3.0. As can be seen
`from these figures, by adjusting the composition of a
`formulation, one can obtain the desired performance from
`the formulation, as reflected by nail swelling and itracona-
`zole partitioning. The benefit of incorporating urea into the
`formulations is demonstrated by a clear trend shown in
`4a—6a and 4b—6b. As can be seen, the increase of itracona-
`zole partitioning into nail owing to the presence of urea is
`higher than the increase of nail swelling in all three formu-
`lations.
`
`TABLE 3
`
`FORMULATIONS
`
`ENHANCER
`
`SVVELLING ("/0 wt x 100)
`AVG
`STD
`Enh. F
`
`ITRA PARTITIONING (rn
`AVG
`ST 3
`E
`
`No E&U
`Ac Cyst
`Cysteine
`Ilomocyst
`Cysteani
`Metl1ylCy
`EthylCys
`No Ac&U
`No Ac
`No U
`Ac-#23
`l\ 0 Ac& U
`No Ac
`No U
`Ac-#26
`No AL'& U
`No A:
`No U
`Ac-#33-3
`
`8054-40-5
`8054-33-3
`8054-34-1
`8054-34-2
`8054-34-3
`8054-34-4
`8054-34-5
`8054-40-5
`8054-40-2
`8054-40-3
`8054-23
`8054-40-4
`8054-33-1
`8054-33-2
`8054-26
`8054-40-5
`8054-33-4
`8054-33-5
`8054-33-3
`
`1.35
`2.11
`2.59
`1.71
`2.06
`1.73
`1.64
`1.43
`1.43
`3.32
`3.61
`1.36
`1.42
`1.80
`2.06
`1.35
`1.52
`1.90
`2.11
`
`0.01
`0.04
`0.03
`0.05
`0.01
`0.04
`0.05
`0.03
`0.06
`0.23
`0.39
`0.06
`0.05
`0.06
`0.06
`0.01
`0.02
`0.06
`0.04
`
`1
`3.18
`4.57
`2.04
`3.03
`2.09
`1.82
`1
`1.01
`5.45
`6.12
`1
`1.18
`2.26
`2.97
`1
`1.5
`2.57
`3.18
`
`0.047
`4.365
`4.897
`1.097
`2.632
`1.430
`1.221
`0.061
`0.068
`0.990
`0.853
`0.059
`0.670
`2.132
`3.293
`0.047
`0.940
`2.281
`4.365
`
`>->—x
`
`0.0
`0.52
`.C >_x »\::o>—n
`0.23
`0.18
`Lnkp>—lO
`0.07
`0.2
`0.03
`0.03
`0.40
`0.1
`0.0
`0.15
`0.09
`0.30
`0.0
`0.167
`0.339
`0.520
`
`>—nLpL/ukplutqun
`
`U\t\>>—t\o>—n
`Lp>—k>—\>—\>—‘>—k>—kbJLp
`
`on
`
`\oJ>-Mu
`
`PERME/5nTI()l\
`
`ITRACONAZOLE IN NAIL
`
`ITRACONAZOLE
`NAIL PERMEATION
`
`Repl:3d
`Repl:1d
`Repl:1d
`
`2138-41
`2138-136
`2138-137
`
`(ug/cniz)
`AVG
`
`22.28
`49.05
`0.00
`
`STD
`
`8.66
`31.79
`0.00
`
`(ug/cmz)
`AVG
`
`.
`. 6
`.
`
`STD
`
`.
`.
`5. 2
`
`(ug/cnij *)
`AVG
`
`1096.5
`691.6
`221.9
`
`STD
`
`516.1
`230.1
`138.4
`
`23
`
`

`
`11
`
`6,042,845
`
`TABLE 3—continued
`PERMEATION
`MICONAZOLE NITRATE IN NAIL
`
`MICONAZOI F. NITRATF.
`NAII, PFRMEATTOV
`
`(lug/cm’)
`AVG
`
`STD
`
`(u.ycn1))
`AVG
`
`(u.g/cur‘ *)
`AVG
`
`221654
`99384
`99998
`
`2138-69
`2138-70
`2138-70
`
`4484
`1889
`1431
`
`Repl:3d
`Rcpl:3d
`Rcpl:7d
`‘Calculation based on the initial volume of the untreated nail.
`‘jug/cm3 = ;zg’cm2 /nail thickness (cm)
`
`952
`278
`147
`
`11215
`4924
`6001
`
`Anail swelling and drug partitioning experiment was also
`conducted for miconazole nitrate using procedures analo-
`gous to those described above. The graphed results shown in
`FIG. 7 show tl1at, similar to itraconazole data, significant
`nail swelling coincided with substantial miconazole parti-
`tioning into the nail, using the following formulation:
`1% Miconazole nitrate, 0.005% BHA, 1.5% heavy n1in-
`eral ofl, 1.5% peglicol 5 oleate (LABRAFIL M 1944 CS),
`10% pegoxol 7 stearate (TEFOSE 63), 0.05% EDTA, 20%
`urea, 10% N-acetyl-1-cysteine, and 55.9% Water, with pH
`adjusted to 9.0 with NaOH, as required.
`It should be noted that, unlike the itraconazole formula-
`tions discussed above, which Were tested at pH 3, the pH
`value of the miconazole nitrate formulation was set at pH 9.
`The significant nail swelling and coinciding high
`miconazole-nail partitioning indicate that N-acetyl-1-
`cysteine has a wide worldng pH range. This was confirmed
`by the swelling-pH profile shown in FIG. 8, using the
`following formulation:
`20% urea, 35% propylene carbonate, 10% propylene
`glycol, 10% N-acetyl-1-cysteine and 25% water, with pH
`adjusted with HCl or NaOH, as required, to pH 3.2, 4.0, 5.0,
`6.0 and 7.0. The experimental temperature was 32° C.
`b. E ect of Nail Penetration Enhancers on Drug Permeation
`Through Nail and the Drug Retention and Distribution in the
`Nail Plate
`the enhancement effect of N-acetyl-1-cysteine
`To test
`containing itraconazole formulation,
`itraconazole perme-
`ation experiments were conducted using human cadaver
`nails. Briefly, a nail plate was mounted on a nail dilIusion
`cell (exposed nail area=0.1202 cmz)
`in which the nail
`separated a donor chamber from a receptor chamber. The /
`donor chamber was then charged with an itraconazole for-
`mulation of 100-200 mg. To simulate the clinical situation,
`the drug formulation in the donor chamber was removed,
`and replenished with fresh drug formulation according to a
`predetermined time schedule. The solution in the receptor _
`chamber was 20% aqueous hydroxypropyl—[3—cyclodextrin
`(5 n1l, pH 4) to ensure sink conditions. [“Sink condition” is
`defined as a condition wherein the concentration of the
`
`permeant (in this case, itraconazole) in the receptor solution
`is lower than 10% of its solubility in the receptor solution—
`the idea is to drive the equilibrium such that the permeation
`of the permeant into the receptor solution is favored.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket