throbber
JOURNAL OF ‘
`
`NUMBER 1
`
`JANUARY 1997
`
`ISSN 0022-3573
`
`—
`
`?.H‘Afi!9lABY L!-SEA-E%’i‘
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 1/8
`Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 1/8
`
`

`
`Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
`
`Published by The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
`1 Lambeth High Street, London SE1 7JN Telephone 0171-735 9141 Telegrams Pharrnakon London SE1
`E-Mail JPP@dial.pipex.com
`
`FAX 0171-820 3917
`
`EDITOR
`
`Dr J. CHAMBERLAIN
`
`ASSISTANT EDITOR
`
`Dr A. L. SUGDEN
`
`EDITORIAL ASSISTANT
`
`G. M. MCMAHON
`
`EDITORIAL BOARD
`
`Board Members
`
`Professor B. W. BARRY, University of Bradford
`Professor E. BEUBLER, University of Graz, Austria
`Professor N. G. BOWERY, University of Birmingham
`Professor W. C. BOWMAN, University of Strathclyde
`Dr K. J. BROADLEY, Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff
`Dr D. A. COWAN, King’s College, London
`Professor S. P. DENYER, University of Brighton
`Professor F. J. EVANS, School of Pharmacy, London
`Professor A. T. FLORENCE, School of Pharmacy, London
`Professor J. L. FORD, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool
`Professor D. GANDERTON OBE (Chairman), British Pharmacopoeia, London
`Professor P. G. JENNER, King’s College, London
`Professor T. M. JONES, Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry, London
`Professor 1. W. KELLAWAY, Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff
`Dr W. E. LINDUP, University of Liverpool
`Professor R. J. NAYLOR, University of Bradford
`Professor K. D. RAINSFORD, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield
`Professor C. RAPER, Victorian College of Pharmacy, Parkville, Australia
`Professor B. TESTA, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
`Dr E. TOMLINSON, GeneMedicine Inc., Texas, USA
`Professor G. T. TUCKER, Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
`Dr B. WIDDOP, Poisons Unit, New Cross Hospital, London
`
`Secretary to the Board
`I. FERGUSON OBE
`
`COPYRIGHT © 1997 Journal ofPharmacy and Pharmacology.
`
`Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Joumal of Pharmacy
`and Pharmacology for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided that
`the base fee of $2.00 per copy, plus 0.10 per page is paid directly to CCC, 21 Congress St, Salem, MA 01970, USA.
`CODE: 0022-3573/90 $2.00+0.lO PP.
`
`Annual subscription for 1997: UK and EC £360 (inc. postage); America and Japan $635; rest of world £395 (air speeded).
`Claims for missing copies cannot be considered unless received within three months of publication.
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 2/8
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 2/8
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`VOLUME 49 0 NUMBER 1 0 JANUARY 97
`
`Medicinal Chemistry
`A KOUROUNAKIS N BODOR J SIMPKINS
`Synthesis and evaluation of brain-targeted chemical
`delivery systems for the neurotrophomodulator 4-
`methylcatechol
`F J GARCIA—MARCH R GARClA—DOMENECH
`J GALVEZ G M ANTON-FOS J v DE JULIAN-ORTIZ
`R GINER—PONS M C RECIO—IGLESlAS
`Pharmacological studies of l—(p-chloro-
`phenyl)propano1 and 2-(l-hydroxy-3-
`butenyl)phenol: two new nonnarcotic analgesics
`designed by molecular connectivity
`Pharmaceutics
`B B LUNDBERG
`A submicron lipid emulsion coated with
`arnphipathic polyethylene glycol for parenteral
`administration of paclitaxel (Taxol)
`
`Biopharmaceutics
`T YAG1 K YAMAUCHI S KUWANO
`The synergistic purgative action of aloe-emodin
`anthrone and rhein anthrone in mice: synergism in
`large intestinal propulsion and water secretion
`H YUASA C KUNO J WATANABE
`Comparative assessment of D-xylose absorption
`between small intestine and large intestine
`D MERTIN B C LIPPOLD
`
`In-vitro permeability of the human nail and of a
`keratin membrane from bovine hooves: influence of
`the partition coefficient octanol/water and the water
`solubility of drugs on their permeability and
`maximum flux
`
`Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
`S TAKEDA T ISONO Y WAKUI Y MIZUHARA
`S AMAGAYA M MARUNO M HATTORI
`In-vivo assessment of extrahepatic metabolism of
`paeoniflorin in rats: relevance to intestinal floral
`metabolism
`
`D POISSON A DUPUIS M BRETEAU S BOUQUET
`M POTERRE W COUET
`Effect of tamoxifen on the phannacokinetics of
`theophylline in rats
`
`Toxicology
`A M TOTTERMAN N G M SCHIPPER D 0 THOMPSON
`J—P MANNERMAA
`Intestinal safety of water-soluble Li-cyclodextrins
`in paediatric oral solutions of spironolactone:
`effects on human intestinal epithelial Caco-2-
`cells
`
`s MARTIN-ARAGON J M BENEDI A M VILLAR
`Modifications on antioxidant capacity and lipid
`peroxidation in mice under fraxetin treatment
`M D COLEMAN J K SMITH A D PERRIS N S BUCK
`J K SEYDEL
`Studies on the inhibitory effects of analogues of
`dapsone on neutrophil-function in-vitro
`
`Receptor Pharmacology
`M J RAMIREZ E GARCiA-GARAYOA G ROMERO
`A MONGE J ROCA J DEL Rio B LASHERAS
`VB20B7, a novel 5-HT-ergic agent with
`gastrokinetic activity. 1. Interaction with 5-HT;
`and 5-HT4 receptors
`
`E GARCIA-GARAYOA A MONGE J ROCA J DEL Rio
`B LASHERAS
`VBZOB7, a novel 5-HT-ergic agent with
`gastrokinetic activity. II. Evaluation of the
`gastroprokinetic activity in rats and dogs
`Cardiovascular Pharmacology
`M Q PAIVA M J SANTOS A ALBINO-TEIXEIRA
`Endothelium-dependent vascular responses in
`l ,3 -dipropyl—8-sulphophenylxanthine (DPSPX)
`hypertensive rats
`JRSHEUWCKOWCHUNGHCPENGTFHUANG
`Interaction of thrombin-activated platelets with
`extracellular matrices (fibronectin and
`vitronectin): comparison of the activity of
`arg-gly-asp-containing venom peptides and
`monoclonal antibodies against glycoprotein IIb/
`Illa complex
`T-B LIU H-C LIN Y—T HUANG C—M SUN C-Y HONG
`Portal hypotensive efiects of tetrandine and
`veraparnil in portal hypertensive rats
`Neuropharmacology
`Y ZHENG B RUSSELL D SCHMIERER R LAVERTY
`The effects of aminorex and related compounds
`on brain monoamines and metabolites in CBA
`mice
`
`l02~1()4
`
`105-107
`
`108-112
`
`B V MACFARLANE A WRIGHT H A E BENSON
`Reversible blockade of retrograde axonal
`transport in the rat sciatic nerve by vincristine
`Natural Products
`L M WANG T YAMAMOTO X X WANG LYANG
`Y KOIKE K SHIBA S MINESHITA
`Effects of Oren—gedoku-to and Unsei-in,
`Chinese traditional medicines, on
`interleukin-8 and superoxide dismutase in
`rats
`
`SREEJAYAN M N A RAO
`Nitric oxide scavenging by curcuminoids
`Biochemical Pharmacology
`1 TAMAI H TAKANAGA H MAEDA H YABUUCHI
`Y SA] Y SUZUKI A TSUJI
`Intestinal brush-border membrane transport
`of monocarboxylic acids mediated by proton-
`coupled transport and anion antiport
`mechanisms
`
`113-118
`
`R IGARASHI Y TSUTSUMI H FUJII S TSUNODA
`A OCHIAI M TAKENAGAY MORIZAWA T MAYUMI
`Y MIZUSI-IIMA
`Lecithinization of IL-6 enhances its
`thrombopoietic activity in mice
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 3/8
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 3/8
`
`

`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`J. Pharrn. Pharmacol. 1997, 49: 30-34
`Received July 9, 1996
`Accepted August 1, 1996
`
`© 1997 J. Pharm. Pharmacol.
`
`In—vitro Permeability of the Human Nail and of a Keratin
`Membrane from Bovine Hooves: Influence of the Partition
`Coefficient Octanol/Water and the Water Solubility of Drugs on
`their Permeability and Maximum Flux
`
`1>
`
`DIRK MERTIN AND BERNHARD C. LIPPOLD
`
`Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Universitiitsstr. 1,
`D-40225 Diisseldmj‘, Germany
`
`Abstract
`
`Penetration of homologous nicotinic acid esters through the human nail and a keratin membrane from bovine
`hooves was investigated by modified Franz diffusion cells in-vitro to study the transport mechanism.
`The partition coefficient octanol/water PCOC,/W of the esters was over the range 7 to >51000. The
`permeability coefficient P of the nail plate as well as the hoof membrane did not increase with increasing
`partition coefficient or lipophilicity of the penetrating substance. This indicates that both barriers behave like
`hydrophilic gel membranes rather than lipophilic partition membranes as in the case of the stratum comeum.
`Penetration studies with the model compounds paracetamol and phenacetin showed that the maximum flux was
`first a function of the drug solubility in water or in the swollen keratin matrix. Dissociation hindered the
`diffusion of benzoic acid and pyridine through the hoof membrane. Since keratin, a protein with an isoelectric
`point of about 5, is also charged, this reduction can be attributed to an exclusion of the dissociating substance
`due to the Donnan equilibrium. Nevertheless, the simultaneous enhancement of the water solubility makes a
`distinct increase of the maximum flux possible.
`In order to screen drugs for potential topical application to the nail plate, attention has to be paid mainly to
`the water solubility of the compound. The bovine hoof membrane may serve as an appropriate model for the
`nail.
`
`Fungal diseases of the nail plate account for up to 30-45% of
`all topical mycoses and the prevalence among the population
`of the industrial nations is about 5% (Evans 1990). Serious
`infections are treated with systemic antimycotics over several
`months, which exposes the organism to a considerable amount
`of drug. Since the introduction of nail lacquers, topical treat-
`ment has become more and more successful for light and
`intermediate mycoses (Qadripur et al 1981; Polak & Zaug
`1990; Meisel 1992; Nolting & Seebacher 1993; Haria &
`Bryson 1995).
`Until now there has been no commonly accepted in-vitro
`model for testing new,
`topically applicable drugs. Because
`human nails are not available in a sufficient number, a model
`based on membranes from the bovine hoof was developed, the
`structure and permeability of which equates with those of the
`human nail. Up to now the mechanism of nail penetration is
`largely uncertain. From investigations of the penetration of
`homologous alcohols through the nail plate, Walters et al
`(1983, 1985b) concluded that it is a hydrophilic gel membrane.
`They postulated an additional lipophilic route for the diffusion
`of lipophilic substances. Therefore, the present work examines
`the dependency of the permeability of both the nail plate and
`the hoof membrane on the partition coefficient between 1-
`octanol and water (PCOC,/w). Homologous nicotinic acid esters
`were used as model compounds with PCOC,/W values over the
`range 7 to > 51000 (Table 1).
`
`Correspondence: B. C. Lippold, Department of Pharmaceutical
`Technology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Universitatsstr. 1, D-40225
`Dusseldorf, Germany.
`
`However, the maximum amount of drug, reaching the side
`of action per time after application to an area A,
`is more
`interesting than the permeability. While in the case of a lipo-
`philic partition membrane the maximum flux depends on the
`drug solubility in the vehicle and the partition coefficient
`(Hagedom-Leweke & Lippold 1995), it increases with grow-
`ing water solubility in the case of hydrophilic gel membranes.
`The dependency of the maximum flux through the nail plate
`and the hoof membrane was investigated with the model
`compounds paracetamol and phenacetin whose solubilities in
`water differ from each other by a factor of 17 (Csw = 16 800
`and 950 mg L"], PCOCUW = 5-7 and 70-8, respectively).
`The solubility of acidic or basic substances in water can be
`increased greatly by dissociation. Enhancement of the max-
`imum flux through the nail plate is possible only when the
`decrease of the permeability coefficient due to dissociation is
`not too strong. Ions cannot penetrate lipid membranes due to
`low partitioning into the membrane. However, they are able to
`overcome hydrophilic gel membranes (Zaikov et al 1988). In
`this respect the penetration of the model compounds benzoic
`acid (pKa 4-19) and pyridine (pK,, 5-19) through the hoof
`membrane was investigated at pH 2-0 and 7-4. In these milieus
`they are nearly completely dissociated or undissociated. The
`neutral benzyl alcohol served as a standard in order to consider
`the possible influence of the pH value on the keratin swelling.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Chemicals
`
`Phosphate buffer solution with sodium chloride pH 7-4 (DAB
`1996), hydrochloric acid buffer pH 20 or ammonium chloride
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 4/8
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 4/8
`
`

`
`IN—VITRO PERMEABILITY OF NAIL AND KERATIN
`
`Table 1. Physical and chemical parameters of the nicotinic acid esters (Le & Lippold 1995).
`Substance
`MW
`
`PCWW
`< my: ‘>
`CsOct
`CSW _ 1
`ms
`(mg mL )
` _j¥_
`
`6-9
`7624
`1106
`137-1
`Methyl nicotinate
`22
`1034
`47
`151-1
`Ethyl nicotinate
`292.
`715
`2-45
`179-2
`Butyl nicotinate
`3233
`548
`0-17
`207-3
`Hexyl nicotinate
`51182
`527
`0-01
`235-3
`Octyl nicotinate
`
`
`MW=molecular weight, C,w=solubility in water, C,oc,=so1ubility in 1-octanol, PCOC,/W:
`partition coefficient between 1-octanol and water.
`
`buffer pH 10-0 (DAB 1996) were used as vehicles. All solutions
`were standardized to an ionic strength of 0-158. Methyl, ethyl,
`butyl and hexyl nicotinate were obtained from Aldrich-Chemie
`(Steinheim), octyl nicotinate from the Department of Pharma-
`ceutical Chemistry of the University of Diisseldorf, paracetamol
`from Boehringer lngelheim KG (Ingelheim), phenacetin from
`Bayer AG (Leverkusen), benzoic acid from Caesar & Lorentz
`(Hilden), benzyl alcohol from Janssen Chimica (Geel, Belgium)
`and pyridine from Kraft GmbH (Duisburg). HPLC grade
`methanol and acetonitrile are products of Riedel-de Haen
`(Seelze, Germany). Water was used freshly distilled.
`
`Diflizsion cells
`Two different diffusion cells were used for the investigations
`of the nail plates and hoof membranes (Mertin 1995). Both
`cells were modifications of the Franz diffusion chamber (Franz
`1975). The vertically oriented donor and acceptor compart-
`ment were joined together by clamps and contained 100 or
`50 mL, respectively. As curved nails must be fixed under
`pressure to seal the cell, the two—part donor compartment was
`built from stainless steel. The nail plate was fixed between
`these two parts screwing them together.
`
`Preparation of the nail plates and hoof membranes
`Healthy nails of the big toe were taken from dead men and
`women, aged 19-61 years, 24 h post mortem at
`the latest.
`Adhering tissue of the nail bed or nail fold was removed by the
`method of Kligrnan and Christophers (Kligman & Christo-
`phers 1963). With the ventral side downwards the nails were
`placed on a cotton pad which was soaked with O-5% trypsin in
`phosphate buffer pH 7-4 and tempered at 37°C over a period of
`10 h. Afterwards the tissue was removed with tweezers, the
`nails rinsed with distilled water and put into water for 24 h to
`remove remaining trypsin. Because keratin is hardly decom-
`posed by proteinases (Falbe & Regitz 1989),
`this method
`enabled receipt of intact nail plates.
`Hooves were taken from freshly slaughtered cattle, rid of
`adhering connective and cartilaginous tissue and put into water
`for 24 h. Afterwards about 100 pm thick membranes were
`taken from the distal part of the ball horn with a microtome
`(Reichert & Jung, Nufiloch). The hoof pieces were strong
`enough not need embedding, even in the swollen state. The
`membranes were punched with a diameter of 25 mm and dried
`at room temperature. Careful inspection of the hoof mem-
`branes by electron microscopy did not show any pores through
`the membranes but only cavities. The thickness of the swollen
`nails and membranes were measured with a micrometer cal-
`liper (Tesa Micromaster, Renens, Switzerland), in the case of
`the nails with the help of a metal ball (5-5 mm diameter).
`
`Analytical conditions
`In the case of hoof membranes the determination of the
`
`acceptor concentration was carried out spectrophotometrically
`(Zeiss DMR 10, Oberkochen). The hourly-collected samples
`were measured at
`the long-wave maximum and thereafter
`returned. In the case of the nail plates the samples had to be
`analysed by HPLC due to the smaller fluxes. The concentration
`was assayed by a modular HPLC unit (LC-6A, Shimadzu,
`Duisburg) equipped with an automatic sample injection mod-
`ule (SIL-6B), system controller (SCL-6B), UV-VIS-spectro-
`photometer
`(SPD-6AV)
`and
`an
`integrator
`(CR 4AX
`Chromatopac). The analyses were carried out at ambient
`temperature with
`a
`125 x 4 mm column packed with
`LiChrospher 100 RP-18, 5 am particle diameter (E. Merck,
`Darmstadt). The mobile phase, consisting of methanol/water
`or acetonitrile/water mixtures was pumped at flow rates ran-
`ging from 1 to 2 mL min_1. Injection volumes varied between
`5 and 150 ;rL. The concentration of the samples was calculated
`from peak areas by the external standard method.
`
`Solubilities
`
`After a rough estimate in a preliminary experiment, the amount
`of substance corresponding to twice the solubility was mixed
`with 20-50 mL solvent in a 100 mL glass bottle by rotating at
`32°C. After 24 h the samples were filtered first by paper
`(Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel) and after that by cellulose
`acetate membrane filter (0-45 am, 25 mm 9) with a filter
`device of stainless steel (Sartorius, Gtittingen). All materials
`were equilibrated at 32°C. Spectrophotornetrical assay of the
`concentration followed immediately to prevent precipitation.
`
`Penetration studies
`
`After filling the acceptor compartment, the swollen nail plate
`or hoof membrane was inserted in the diffusion cell. The cells
`were equilibrated at 32°C in a water bath (thermostat Julabo
`Paratherm IM,
`Juchheim Labortechnik, Seelbach),
`then
`100 mL donor liquid was added and samples were taken from
`the acceptor periodically. The measuring interval was deter-
`mined by the penetration rate. If it was high enough (hoof
`membrane) the samples were taken hourly. In the case of the
`nail plate samples were collected daily or weekly because of
`the low permeability and therefore long test period. Since all
`investigations with nail plates were analysed by HPLC, the
`samples (1-7 mL) could not be returned but had to be replaced
`by buffer solution. The acceptor dilution was corrected arith-
`metically (computer-aided). The media were preserved with
`0-02% sodium azide in the case of a long test period. The
`acceptor was mixed by a magnetic stirrer (Ikamag EOA 9 with
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 5/8
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 5/8
`
`

`
`32
`
`DIRK MERTIN AND BERNHARD C. LIPPOLD
`-6
`
`Controller ES 5, Janke & Kunkel, Staufen i. Br., Germany)
`during the whole course.
`The donor concentration of methyl, ethyl and butyl nicoti-
`nate was about 1000 mg L"1, while hexyl and octyl nicotinate
`were used as saturated solutions at 32°C. Octyl nicotinate was
`investigated only with the hoof membrane due to its low
`solubility and low flux. Paracetamol and phenacetin were used
`as saturated solutions at 32°C. In the case of the investigations
`of charge influence the donor concentrations were between
`1000 (pyridine) and 5000 mg L” (benzoic acid).
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Influence of the partition caefiicient 0ctanol/water on the
`permeability coefficient
`The evaluation of the data is based on Fick’s law:
`
`5:? = D33” - (CBD — CBA)
`
`(1)
`
`fr-o———+————;————§
`HN
`
`2
`
`3
`L09 PCOct/W
`
`FIG. 1. Relationship between permeability coefficient P and partition
`coefficient octanol/water PCOWW of the nicotinic acid esters across
`human nail plate (I) and bovine hoof membrane (C) at 32°C (11 = 3--8,
`means :1: s.d.). MN = methyl
`nicotinate,
`EN = ethyl
`nicotinate,
`BN = butyl nicotinate, HN = hexyl nicotinate, ON = octyl nicotinate.
`P in cm2 s‘1
`
`case of the hoof membrane: compared with the nail plate the
`keratin matrix in the hoof membrane is probably wider-
`meshed, so that the increasing molecular weight reduces the
`diffusion coefficient only insignificantly. The enlargement of a
`molecule only in one direction, as is the case with homologs,
`merely leads to a small decrease of D, because the cross-
`section remains constant assuming orientation in the direction
`of diffusion (Flynn et al 1974).
`Although the perrneabilities presented here are in the same
`order of magnitude as the results of Walters et al (1983,
`1985b), there is an essential difference in that the decrease of
`the perrneabilities from the C2-
`to the C3-alcohol
`(from
`1-6 x 10-6 to 7-5 X 1O‘8 cm s_1) is much stronger but the
`diffusion coefficients are nearly the same. The authors justified
`the assumption of a decreasing partition coefficient nail/water
`with an endergonic transfer of a methyl group from water into
`the nail compartment. This explanation is only conclusive
`when the affinity of a substance to the nail plate decreases
`faster than its affinity to water with increasing lipophilicity.
`Harrison & Speakman (1958) also reported a decreasing dif-
`fusion of n-alcanoles in keratin with increasing chain length.
`As pure alcohols were used for these investigations, the per-
`meabilities decreased probably because of the reduced swel-
`ling of keratin or increasing molecular volume. Our results
`with homologous nicotinic acid esters correspond with the
`investigations of Walters et al (1983, 1985b) as far as the nail
`plate is characterized as a hydrophilic gel membrane rather
`than a lipophilic partition membrane. In contrast to the stratum
`comeum, the lipid content of the nail plate is much lower (0-1-
`1% (Walters & Flynn 1983); stratum comeum: 15% of dry
`weight (Flynn 1985)). The high water content of the swollen
`nail plate (about 27% (Mertin 1995)) indicates the presence of
`a hydrophilic gel membrane, too. The hoof membrane behaves
`similarly: there is no dependency of the PCQC,/W or the lipo-
`philicity on the permeability of the penetrating drug.
`
`Maximum fluxes and water salubilities
`The equation for calculating the maximum flux (Jmax) follows
`directly from the first Fick’s law (eqn 1). Jmax is the amount of
`substance that penetrates through a barrier of the area A and
`the thickness h]; per unit of time from a saturated solution
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 6/8
`
`in which dM/dt is the penetrating amount per time, DB the
`effective diffusion coefficient in the barrier, hg the thickness of
`the barrier, and CBD and CBA the concentration in the barrier
`on the donor and the acceptor side, respectively. As the con-
`centration in the barrier is normally unknown, CED is replaced
`by PCB/V-CV, in which PCB/V is the partition coefficient bar-
`rier/vehicle and CV is the vehicle concentration of the pene-
`trating compound in the donor. The term DB-PCB/V is called
`permeability coefficient P. On the condition that not more that
`10% of the drug amount in the donor penetrates, P can be
`calculated from the slope of a plot M vs t:
`D -90
`-A-C
`P-A-
`B
`
`B/V
`ha
`
`V_t=
`
`CV_t
`
`hB
`
`M:
`
`then it grows with
`If P is dependent on the lipophilicity,
`increasing PCB/V. This term is normally unknown and its
`determination is difficult. So PCB/V is approached by the
`partition coefficient octanol/water (PCOCI/W)
`in the case of
`biological membranes. Considering the equation of Collander
`(1947), who quantified the relationship between PCOC,/W and
`PCB/V, log P can be calculated from:
`
`log P = log DB + b + a - log PCOCI/W
`
`(3)
`
`If the solubility properties of octanol and the lipid barrier are
`not the same, the slope a differs more or less from the ideal
`value of unity but is distinctly greater than 0. But if the barrier
`behaves like a hydrophilic gel membrane,
`then the penne-
`ability is independent of the PCOC‘/w and the slope becomes 0.
`The permeability coefficients of the hoof membrane (PH)
`exceeded that of the nail plate (PN) 10- to 30-fold (Fig. 1).
`Unlike the hoof membrane, where the lag-time was only a few
`minutes,
`steady-state penetration through the nail plate
`occurred after 10 (methyl nicotinate) up to 80 (hexyl nicoti-
`nate) h. The plot of P vs PCOC,/w in a logarithmic scale
`according to equation 3 does not show a positive slope. Rather
`the permeability of the hoof membrane is independent of the
`lipophilicity of the penetrating substances (P=0-05). How-
`ever, the decrease of the permeability in case of the nail plate is
`highly significant (P = 0-01), but also contradicts the model of
`a partition membrane. It can be explained by the decreasing
`diffusion coefficient due to the increasing molecular volume. It
`can only be assumed why this factor has no influence in the
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 6/8
`
`

`
`IN-VITRO PERMEABILITY OF NAIL AND KERATIN
`
`33
`
`
`
`LogJmax(1000um)
`
`32
`
`3-4
`
`3-6
`Log Csw
`
`3-8
`
`4-0
`
`4-2
`
`4-4
`
`FIG. 2. Relationship between the logarithm of the maximum flux Jmax
`(1000 um) and the logarithm of the water solubility of the model
`compounds paracetamol (PAR) and phenacetin (PHE) across human
`nail plate (I) and bovine hoof membrane (C) at 32°C (n=4,
`means:l:s.d.). Jmx (1000 pm) in mg cm”2 s
`1; Csw in mg L71.
`
`(sink-conditions):
`
`dM,,,,, _ P
`J‘““‘ dt-A —hB CW
`
`Taking the logarithms results in:
`P
`B
`log Jmax = log? + log CSV
`
`(5)
`
`Neglecting effects of the molecular Volume and assuming a
`hydrophilic gel membrane, the term log P/hB in equation 5 is
`constant and the maximum flux is only dependent on the
`solubility of the drug in water. Then we expect, for a plot of
`logarithmic maximum fluxes vs logarithmic water solubilities,
`a linear correlation with the ideal slope of unity. This was
`confirmed by the results of the nail plate (slope 1-082) as well
`as the hoof membrane (slope 1-003, Fig. 2). For better com-
`parability the maximum fluxes were standardized to a barrier
`thickness of 1000 pm. The slight positive deviation of the
`slope in the case of the nail plate was explained by the stronger
`influence of the molecular size on the permeability. The denser
`network of filamentous keratin compared with that of the hoof
`membrane exhibited more resistance to the more voluminous
`
`phenacetin than to paracetamol. This was expressed not only
`by the lower maximum flux (Fig. 2), but also by the lower
`penneability
`coefficient
`calculated
`from these
`results:
`1-78 :|:0-32 x IOT8 cm2 s71
`for
`paracetamol
`and
`1-40:l:O-47 x 1078 cm2 s71 for phenacetin respectively.
`It has to be emphasized that the maximum flux of a sub-
`stance firstly depends on its water solubility and, considering
`
`that, this investigation with only two model compounds must
`be interpreted carefully. This agrees with the model of a
`hydrophilic gel membrane where the solubility in the barrier,
`which determines the maximum flux, corresponds to the
`solubility in the swelling medium that is water. In contrast, the
`maximum flux through a lipophilic partition membrane is a
`function of the partition coefficient and the solubility in the
`vehicle. Approaching the solubility in the barrier by the solu-
`bility in octanol, complex equations result. With their help
`maximum fluxes can be predicted by knowledge of the drug
`solubility in the vehicle and in octanol (Hagedom-Leweke
`& Lippold 1995). The consequence is that one has to pay
`attention primarily to the highly different water solubilities and
`only secondly to the more similar permeability coefficients in
`order to screen drugs for potential topical application to the
`nail plate.
`
`Penetration of electrolytes
`Dissociation of benzoic acid and pyridine led to a reduction of
`their penetration rate through the hoof membrane. Table 2
`shows that the permeability coefficients of the ionic forms
`were significantly lower
`than those of the neutral
`form.
`Because the penetration of benzyl alcohol decreases sig-
`nificantly by a half (t-test, P = 0-05) after the transition from an
`acidic to a neutral or basic milieu, the neutral compound serves
`as a standard. To this end the quotients of the permeability
`coefficients Pbenzoic acid or Ppyridine and Pbenzyl alcohol are built
`and compared with each other (Table 3).
`Dissociation reduces the diffusion rate of benzoic acid to a
`
`fifth and that of pyridine to a quarter. Assuming the isoelectric
`point of keratin is about 5 (Marshall 1983),
`it is positively
`charged at pH 2-0 and negatively charged at pH 7-4. However,
`nothing is known about the charge density. The decrease of
`penetration caused by dissociation is due to the Donnan effect
`(Meares 1968; Higa et al 1990, 1991) or the electrostatic
`repulsion between the membrane and the diffusing molecule
`(Kobayashi et al 1994). At pH 7-4 benzoate is a co-ion to the
`negatively charged keratin and hence it is displaced from the
`membrane; the lower concentration gradient then leads to a
`reduction of the permeability. In the case of an acidic milieu,
`the pyridinium—cation is displaced from the now positively
`charged keratin leading to a decreased penetration compared
`with the neutral form. Nevertheless, diffusion of ionic sub-
`stances through the hoof membrane confirm the assumption of
`a hydrophilic gel membrane (Zaikov et al 1988).
`Some authors attribute the lowering of the electrolyte dif-
`fusion through charged polymers to sorption effects (Medley
`1957; Meares 1968; Zaikov et al 1988). Since only the free
`
`Table 2. Permeability coefficients of benzyl alcohol, benzoic acid and pyridine
`through the bovine hoof membrane.
`
`Benzyl alcohol
`
`Benzoic acid
`
`Pyridine
`
`pH
`
`207-4
`10-0
`2-0
`7-4
`2-07-4
`
`Temperature = 32°C (n = 4, means i: s.d.).
`
`Permeability coefficient (1073 cm2 s“ 1)
`
`78-24:1: 16-45
`41-72:t7-07
`48-78 :l:8-40
`78-62i 16-43
`8-29 21:1-36
`19-l4:l:7-05
`44~80i 10-35
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 7/8
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2192 - 7/8
`
`

`
`34
`
`DIRK MERTIN AND BERNHARD c. LIPPOLD
`
`Table 3. Permeability coefficients of benzoic acid (PBAC) and pyr-
`idine <PpyR) through the bovine hoof membrane at pH 2-0 and 7-4,
`standardized to benzyl alcohol (PBAL).
`
`Benzoic acid
`
`Pyridine
`
`PH
`
`2-0
`7 -4
`2-0
`7-4
`
`Temperature = 32°C (n = 4).
`
`PBAC/PBAL
`
`PPYR/PBAL
`
`1-00
`0-20
`
`fraction is able to penetrate, sorption to functional groups
`could lead to a decrease of the concentration gradient. How-
`ever, investigations with polydimethylsiloxane films contain-
`ing a silica filler show that sorption only causes a prolongation
`of
`the
`lag-time but not
`a
`reduced
`steady-state
`flux
`(Flynn & Roseman 1971). Due to the dynamic exchange of the
`free substance between membrane and donor solution,
`the
`resulting concentration of the free drug in the membrane will
`not alter after the adjustment of the sorption equilibrium at the
`steady state and is independent of the degree of saturation of
`the functional groups, on the condition that there is no decrease
`of the donor concentration by the sorption. Therefore, an
`interpretation of the hindered penetration of charged molecules
`is preferred on the basis of the Donnan potential.
`The reduced permeability of the neutral compound benzyl
`alcohol at pH 7-4 as compared with pH 2-0 is probably caused
`by a decrease of the keratin swelling due to the charge inversion
`of the keratin at the transition from an acidic to a neutral or basic
`
`environment. The weak, not significant increase of the pene-
`tration of the benzyl alcohol changing the pH from 7-4 to 10-0
`lends further support to this hypothesis, because the number of
`negatively charged groups in keratin (IEP~5) at pH 10-0 is
`nearly the same as in a milieu of pH 7-4.
`Applying these results to the human nail, they contradict the
`investigations of Walters et al (l985a), who could not find a
`dependency of the nail permeability of miconazole on the
`degree of dissociation. Maybe this contradiction is explained
`by the higher ionic strength of the solutions; in this case the
`influence of the Donnan equilibrium is lowered. Since the
`amino acid composition of keratin is dependent on the species
`(Fraser & MacRae 1973), the different results could also be
`put down to varying charge densities of hoof and nail keratin.
`The reduction of the hoof permeability to a quarter caused by
`complete dissociation of the substance is much lower than the
`possible enhancement of the solubility of hardly soluble acids
`and bases. So the solubility is increased a hundred fold at 99%
`degree of ionization (assuming sufficient solubility of the salt).
`Since the maximum flux is primarily a function of the solu-
`bility in water (see above), it is possible to heighten the per-
`meability of both the hoof membrane and the nail plate by
`dissociation of the penetrating drug if the milieu in the barrier
`causes no precipitation of the substance.
`
`References
`
`Collander, R. (1947) On “lipoid solubility”. Acta Physiol. Scand. 13:
`363-381
`Evans. E. G. V. (1990) Nail derrnatophytosis: the nature and scale of
`the problem. J. Dermatol. Treat. 1 (Suppl. 2): 47-48
`Falbe, J., Regitz, M. (1989) Rtimpp Chemie-Lexikon. G. Thieme
`Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 2195-2196
`
`(1985) Mechanism of percutaneous absorption from
`Flynn, G. L.
`physicochemical evidence.
`In: Bronaugh, R. L., Maibach, H.
`I.
`(eds) Percutaneous Absorption: Mechanisms —Methodology-
`Drug Delivery (Dermatology, Vol. 6). Marcel Dekker Inc., New
`York, pp 17-41
`Flynn, G. L., Roseman, T. J. (1971) Membrane diffusion II: influence
`of physical adsorption on the molecular flux through heterogeneous
`dimethylpolysiloxane barriers. J. Pharm. Sci. 60: 1788-1796
`Flynn, G. L., Yalkowsky, S. H.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket