throbber
vxur “Pt ‘~53-F?-on in irixiestig-stsorzeil -iirtzqs.
`I
`.
`UK ‘
`- L31.-r.
`NE 2;
`.I.. b r
`35-4,
`--v.
`
`'
`WW
`r'_eO‘-'.
`
`A
`
`'
`
`*
`
`'
`
`Vol 6 N0 2 February 20 5
`
` fi 5
`
`Mike Williams EDITOR
`Stanley Crooke, Annette Doherty, William Hagmann, l0h" K9-mPv lamb I Plattner Co'EDlToRs
`
`/n this issue
`
`Anti-infectives
`- Pathogenic bacteria: How to get them back
`into the line of fire?
`
`I
`
`' Bacterial efflux pump inhibition
`' The use of quorum—sensing blockers to control
`biofilm-associated infections
`
`' New strategies for the treatment of infections
`associated with prosthetic joints
`
`' Protecting APOBEC3G: A promising new
`target for HIV drug discovery
`
`’ Current approaches to developing a
`Preventative HIV vaccine
`
`° H|V—1 assembly and budding as targets for
`drug discovery
`
`° Recent advances in antileishmanial drug
`
`development
`
`' Hepatotoxicity of antifungal agents
`' Telavancin
`.
`
`r
`
`R°taTe“
`' VRX-496
`
`A:
`
`N .
`
`,4 M
`PROPERTY
`NATIONAL
`K
`A Wm LIBRARY or
`A MEDICINE
`..............mum mm.
`
`is mater al was E>D«[J'lEi.‘.l
`atithe F-JLl%:1am:i may be
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2179 - 1/10
`
`

`
`Current Opinion in lnvestigational Drugs
`Copyright © 2005 The Thomson Corporation
`No part ol this publication may be reproduced, stored
`in a retrieval system, ortransmitted in any electronic
`or other form without prior permission of the copyright
`owner.
`
`Current Opinion in lnvestigational Drugs
`ISSN 1472-4472
`is published monthly by:
`
`Thomson Scientific
`Middlesex House
`34-42 Cleveland Street
`London
`W1T 4JE
`UK
`Tel: +44(0)20 7070 6565
`Fax: +44(0)2O 7070 6570
`Email: TS.Custserv.EMEA@thomson.com
`
`Editorial Director Tara Dyson
`Publications Manager Bernadette Swords
`Managing Editor (Journal) Barbara Chan
`Managing Editor (Evaluations) Justine Hookes
`In-house Editors (Journal) Tracey Collins. Paula
`Finn
`ln-house Editors (Evaluations) Rebecca Enich,
`Sue Gotham, Sarah Harris, Ploy Mazucco, Tom
`Phillips
`Assistant Editors Timur Mehmet, Amanda Prince.
`Peter Stanislas
`Production Editor Debbie Wallbank
`Cover design © 2005 Andrew SR Featherstone -
`Research Graphix
`
`Article reprints are available through Thomson
`Scientific‘s reprint service. For information contact:
`TS.Custserv.EMEA@thomson.com
`
`Advertising information
`Advertising is accepted in Current Opinion in
`lnvestigational Drugs. For further information on
`this and other products produced by Thomson
`Scientific, contact: Ken Forrest, Thomson Scientific.
`Holbrook House, 14 Great Queen Street, London,
`WC2B 5DF, UK
`Ken.Forrest@thoms0n.com, +44 (0)20 7424 2168 or
`visit our website at
`wwmthamsoncurrentdrugs.com
`
`While every eflort is made by the publisher
`and editorial board to see that no inaccurate or
`misleading data, opinion or statement appear
`in this journal, they wish to make it clear that
`the data and opinions appearing in the articles
`and advertisements herein are the
`responsibility of the contributor or advertiser
`concerned. Accordingly, the publishers, the
`editorial board and section editors and their
`respective employees, officers and agents
`accept no liability whatsoever for the
`consequences of any such inaccurate or
`misleading data, opinlon or statement.
`
`Current Opinion in lnvestigational Drugs is
`indexed by Index Medicus, MEDLINE,
`EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical
`Abstracts and Denivent Drug File.
`
`Printed in the UK
`
`
`
`Subscription information Annual subscription (twelve issues)
`Subscription rates include airspeed delivery
`Rest of World
`Ja an
`North America
`E‘. 2167
`¥ 468,660
`$ 3435
`Corporate
`2 1081
`¥ 234,330
`$ 1744
`Additional copy
`¥ 234,330
`Academic rate
`$ 1744
`
`Orders
`All orders (except for Japan) should
`be placed with
`
`Thomson Scientific
`Customer Support and Order
`Processing Department
`1st Floor, Holbrook House
`14 Great Queen Street
`London
`WC2B SDF
`UK
`
`Tel +44 (0) 20 7344 2300
`Fax +44 (0)20 7344 2972
`
`Orders for Japan
`Technomics Inc
`Nihonbashi TM Bldg
`1-8-11 Nihonbashi
`Horidome-cho
`Chuo-ku
`Tokyo 103
`Japan
`
`Tel +81 3 3666 2952
`Fax +81 3 3666 2730
`
`Subscription queries
`All enquiries should be addressed to
`
`Thomson Scientific
`Customer Support and Order Processing Department
`1st Floor, Holbrook House
`14 Great Queen Street
`London
`WC2B SDF
`UK
`
`Tel +44 (0)20 7344 2800
`Fax +44 (0)20 7344 2972
`
`in case of particular difficulty please contact
`TS.Custserv.EMEA@thomson.com
`
`This material waste-pied
`at: the NLM a no may be
`i--
`.. «="
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2179 - 2/10
`
`

`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Hepatotoxicity of antifungal agents
`Jessica C Song” & Stanley Deresinskiz
`Address
`
`‘De%artment of Pharmacy Services
`and Division of Infectious Disease
`Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
`San Jose
`CA 95128
`USA
`
`Email: Jessica.Song@hhs.co.santa-c|ara.ca.us
`
`‘To whom correspondence should be addressed
`
`gii|_rrr]en_: Opinion in Invesiigational Drugs 2005 6(2):170-177
`e homson Corporation ISSN 1472-4472
`
`/lntzfungal agents have been implicated in numerous cases of
`hfpatotoxicity throughout
`the past few decades. Hepatotoxic
`reactions to antifungal agents range from slight, asymptomatic
`abnor-malities in liver function tests to potentially fatal fnlminant
`hep!-ltzcfailare. Clinically significant hepatic injury resulting from
`“’mf1”lg”l
`therapy most
`commonly manifests
`as
`acute
`hepatocellular,
`cholestatic or mixed hepatocellular—cholestatic
`reactions.
`In general, reactions usually resolve on cessation of
`therapy, but some antifungal agents may induce chronic liver
`damage. This review will summarize the hepatotoxicity profiles of
`the major
`classes of antifungal
`agents
`and will provide
`recommendations for drug monitoring in order to minimize the
`risk of hepatotoxicity.
`
`Keywords Adverse effect, amphotericin B, amphotericin B
`colloidal
`dispersion,
`amphotericin
`B
`lipid
`complex,
`antifungals,
`caspofungin,
`fluconazole,
`flucytosine,
`griseofulvin, hepatotoxicity,
`itraconazole, ketoconazole,
`liposomal
`amphotericin
`B,
`ravuconazole,
`terbinafine,
`toxicity, voriconazole
`
`and appropriate
`importance in the early rec0gr1ifi01'1
`critical
`toxicity and other
`ession
`management of adverse effects. While r1ePhI°
`I
`systemic effects of amphotericin B, and myelosuptid over
`associated with flucytosine have been well dOcul'Itle9(1;tOwaIdS
`the past few decades, less attention has been d1r€C
`the hepatotoxicity of antifungal agents [2]-
`
`gents range from
`Hepatotoxic reactions to pharmacolcj81C_al a
`function tests l0
`slight, asymptomatic abnormalitiesln l1‘_’91'
`e. The tYPe_ of
`potentially fatal
`fulminant hepatic fall“
`of liver function
`hepatotoxicity can be classified with the 1159
`findings
`l4l~
`tests
`or
`according
`to
`liver
`bl_0P5Y
`that results in
`Pharmacological agents may cause miury he atocenular
`degeneration or necrosis of h9Pat°CYl95_ (-r1}:lI‘V)- Some
`injury) or to arrested bile flow (C_l"‘_’1e5lat]c lcltergzed bya
`drugs may induce a mixed pattern 1flJ“_’Y Chara Hular and
`combination of the features observed 1_n.hePal(?Ce t
`icany
`cholestatic
`injury. Hepatocellular
`lnlury
`lst ytlian 2.
`associated with predominant elevations and Srea :rLT) and
`fold increases in serum alanine aminotransferase (
`[4]
`In
`aspartate aminotransferase (AST) C0nC?ntral‘°ns 1
`fi've1
`contrast, cholestatic injury is characterized by’: =7 Gite};
`slight elevations of aminotransferase levels, but Wlt gr/{LP}
`than 4-fold increases
`in alkaline
`pl105Phata5C ,1,( 1).“
`concentrations (often accompanied by increased bi j1r:"1]
`concentrations) and an ALT/ALP ratio of less than 2 [
`,
`t
`Furthermore,
`liver biopsy findings often‘ reveal potr
`inflammation in patients with cholestatic m]111'Yi but no 1“
`patients with hepatocellular injury.
`
`he major
`'triazoles,
`This review will describe the hepatotoxicity of t
`_
`classes of antifungals (ie, polyenes,
`imld3Zf’1e'
`echinocandin, allylamine, flucytosine and griseofulvin)‘ as
`summarized in Table 1. In addition, this review will pligcfvlcle
`recommendations for drug monitoring (when applica e) in
`order to minimize the risk of hepatotoxicity.
`
`introduction
`During the past two decades there has been a dramatic
`increase in the incidence of systemic fungal infections [1].
`This is due to: (i) the increasing number of bone marrow and
`solid
`organ
`transplantation
`patients
`receiving
`chemotherapy, (ii) the spread of AIDS, and (iii) advances in
`medical practice and technology leading to the increased
`utilization of invasive procedures for
`the treatment of
`critically ill patients [1]. Candida and Aspergillus species
`constitute the leading causes of invasive fungal infections,
`with Candida albicans accounting for
`the majority of all
`Candida infections [2]. However, non-albicans Candida spp
`are also increasingly reported as causes of life-threatening
`fungal
`infections. The current antifungal armamentarium
`available for the treatment of patients with invasive fungal
`infections is
`limited to amphotericin B and its
`lipid
`formulations,
`flucytosine,
`ketoconazole,
`the
`triazole
`antifungals itraconazole, fluconazole and voriconazole, and
`the echinocandin caspofungin [2].
`
`Polyenes
`_
`Amphotericin B deoxycholate
`Amphotericin B deoxycholate, a polyene antifungal, has
`been in clinical use for more than 37 years and is rarely
`implicated in cases of acute liver failure. The incidence of
`acute liver failure secondary to amphotericin B deoxycholate
`treatment
`is likely to be extremely low (less than l%
`incidence cited by the manufacturer) [6]. The prescribing
`information for this drug does not include the frequency of
`liver
`function test abnormalities. However,
`in a study
`comparing the efficacy of amphotericin B deoxycholate with
`liposomal amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy
`for febrile, neutropenic patients, a 20% frequency (increase
`in ALT or AST) was observed among patients receiving
`either drugs
`[7]. To date, despite the availability of
`amphotericin B deoxycholate in the US for nearly 40 years,
`Hepatic injury due to medications of all types is a concern,
`only three cases of significant hepatotoxicity associated with
`since it is implicated in 15 to 25% of acute liver failure cases
`amphotericin B deoxycholate have been reported in the
`in the US, with case fatality rates ranging from 10 to 50% [3].
`medical literature [80]. The pattern of liver injury observed
`With the increasing prevalence of systemic fungal infections,
`in these cases were mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic or
`some requiring prolonged treatment, an awareness of the
`predominantly hepatocellular, with hepatic injury occurring
`toxicity profiles of the available antifungal agents is of
`1'»-.i.e rv-I-I9wv<rf-Il \Dv“liF rfifiiflfl
`
`CFAD V. Anacor |PR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2179 - 3/10
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2179 - 3/10
`
`

`
`Table 1. Hepatotoxic reactions to antifungal agents.
`' Antfgal drug
`lnesd inidence W a f liveijur
`LFTs/liver failure
`
`Polyene
`Amphotericin B
`deoxyoholate
`
`Acute liver failure rarely
`reported
`
`Hepatoceliular and
`hepatocelIularchoiestatic.
`
`Hepatotoxicity of antifungal agents Song 81 Deresinski 171
`
`7 Tim 0 nset ’
`
`H
`
`Preventive tratgy
`
`As early as 4 days
`or after total dose
`of approximately
`5 Q.
`
`Concomitant administration of
`other hepatotoxic antifungals, such
`as itraconazoie and amphotericin
`B, may increase the risk for
`hepatotoxicity due to increased
`Ieakiness of mammalian cell-
`membranes.
`
`Liposomal
`amphotericin B
`
`lmidazole
`Ketoconazole
`
`Triazoles
`Voriconazole
`
`Bi|i=11.1to18.1%;
`ALT = 14.6%; AST =
`12.8%; ALP = 7.1 to
`22.2%
`
`Not reported
`
`Bili = 3 to 19%;
`ALT/AST = 1 to 5%;
`ALP = 3 to 7%
`
`Transaminases = 2 to
`10%
`
`ALT = 10.7 to 18-9%;
`AST = 11.7 to 20.3%;
`ALP = 10.2 to 16%; Bill
`= 4.3 to 19.4%
`
`Hepatoceilular-cholestatic.
`
`Cholestatic.
`
`Hepatoceliular and
`hyperbiiirubinemia.
`
`As early as 10
`days,
`
`Not reported.
`
`Not reported.
`
`Mostly hepatocellular,
`cholestasis and
`he - atooellular-choiestatic.
`
`7 Weeks (range of
`1.5 to 24 weeks).
`
`Hepatocellular-cholestatic,
`hepatocellular and
`cholestatic.
`
`Often within first 10
`days of therapy.
`
`Monitor for CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and
`CYP2C19-mediated drug
`interactions.
`
`Fluconazole
`
`ALT/AST = 1%
`
`Hepatoceilular, hepatic
`necrosis and hepatoce|iuiar-
`cholestatic.
`
`4 to 34 days.
`
`Dose adjust for renal function.
`
`HepatocelIular-cholestatic
`and cholestatic.
`
`5 Days to several
`months.
`
`Not reported.
`
`Usually within 1
`month.
`
`Within 4 to 6
`weeks.
`3 Weeks to 4
`months.
`
`Adjust dose for renal function;
`maintain peak levels of 50 to 100
`/ml.
`
`i1
`1‘
`1
`1
`
`i
`Monitor ALP levels in patients who 1
`develo heaticd sfunction.
`Avoid a second course of
`treatment if patient experiences
`course.
`facial edema/pruritis during first
`
`i
`)
`
`ltraconazole
`
`Echinocandin
`Caspofungm
`acetate
`
`Flucytosine
`
`ALT = 2 to 3%; AST =
`1 to 2%; ALP = 1 to
`2%; Bill = 4 to 6%
`
`ALT = 10.8 to 13%;
`AST = 10.5 to 10.8%;
`Bili = 2.3%
`Transaminases = 0 to
`41%
`
`Hepatocelluiar and
`hyperbilirubinemia.
`
`Hepatocelluiar, cholestatic,
`hyperblllrubinemia and
`heatic necrosis.
`
`Allylamine
`Terbinallne
`
`Griseofulvin
`
`Transaminases = 4%
`
`Not reported
`
`Hepatoceliular, cholestatic
`and fulminant heatic failure,
`Cholestatic.
`
`Aacn amphotericin B colloidal dispersion, ABLC amphotericin B lipid complex, ALP alkaline phosphatase, ALT alanine aminotransferase,
`AST aspartate aminotransferase, Bili total bilirubin, LFTs liver function tests
`
`after the administration of cumulative doses ranging from
`200 mg to 5 g. The exact pathophysiology of amphotericin B
`deoxycholate-induced hepatic injury is unknown, but
`interference with the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme
`system and non—selective cellular disruption have been
`suggested [8.,9o]. Non-selective disruption of mammalian
`cells increases the permeability of cells, thereby facilitating
`the entry of other drug entities into the intracellular
`compartment. The risk of hepatic injury may then possibly
`be increased by the administration of amphotericin_B
`deoxycholate in combination with potentially hepatotoxic
`agents.
`
`One reported case involved a 26-year-old Caucasian male
`with pulmonary Blastomyces dermatilidis infection [80]. Initial
`treatment employed oral itraconazole (200 mg twice daily);
`intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate (25 mg on the first
`day,
`followed by 50 mg once daily) was added to the
`therapeutic regimen 6 days later. Asymptomatic e1€Vafi01’i5
`in ALT, AST and ALP concentrations were noted after the
`patient
`received four doses of amphotericin B and a
`cumulative dose of 3200 mg of itraconazole. Peak levels of
`ALT, AST and ALP occurred the next day and were 518, 294
`and 205 U/1, respectively, thus prompting discontinuation
`of amphotericin B therapy. Within 4 days, the patient's hvel‘
`This rnateri al w‘as»m«pie»1:l
`at the NL!sr1a.nd may be
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2179 - 4/10
`
`

`
`172 Current Opinion in lnvestigational Drugs 2005 Vol 6 No 2
`
`function tests normalized, despite continuation of itraconazole
`therapy. The patient described in this study likely experienced
`hepatocellular injury, as the liver damage primarily manifested
`as increases in ALT and AST. A possible adverse drug
`interaction with amphotericin B deoxycholate and itraconazole
`was postulated based on the enhanced entry of itraconazole
`into the intracellular compartment.
`
`Two previous cases of possible amphotericin B-related
`hepatotoxicity occurred after considerably higher
`total
`closes: a patient receiving amphotericin B for cryptococcal
`meningitis developed hepatotoxicity after a cumulative dose
`of almost 5 g while he was also receiving chlorpromazine, a
`recognized hepatotoxic agent; another patient developed
`reversible
`increases
`in transaminases and ALP after
`receiving a cumulative dose of 571 mg [80].
`
`Liposomal amphotericin B
`the only lipid
`Liposomal
`amphotericin B (AmBisome),
`formulation of amphotericin B that represents a liposomal drug
`delivery system, has been licensed for use in the US for seven
`years [10,11]. The incidence of elevations in bilirubin, ALT, AST
`and ALP levels associated with this agent in various clinical
`trials was 11.1 to 18.1, 14.6, 12.8 and 7.1 to 22.2%, respectively
`[10]. Of note,
`the safety data were primarily derived from
`clinical trials with febrile, neutropenic patients, a severely ill
`population in whom such abnormalities
`are
`frequently
`observed. At present, one case of mixed hepatocellular-
`cholestatic reaction secondary to liposomal amphotericin B has
`been reported in the medical literature [120]. The mechanism by
`which liposomal amphotericin B induces hepatotoxicity is
`believed to be due to the lipid component of this product, as the
`drug is preferentially sequestered in the reticuloendothelial
`tissue [120]
`
`Mohan et al described a study involving a 9-year-old patient
`who developed hepatic dysfunction after
`receiving a
`cumulative dose of 168 mg of liposomal amphotericin B over
`7 clays [12o]. Liposomal amphotericin B was discontinued
`after 11 days when the patient's ALT, AST and ALP were
`found to be 364, 1112 and 1254 U/l, respectively. Within 7
`days of discontinuing the drug, the patients liver function
`tests normalized. The liver
`function test abnormalities
`observed in this patient indicated a mixed hepatocellular-
`cholestatic injury. A retrospective report on the use of
`liposomal amphotericin B in 133 episodes of
`fungal
`infections
`lends support
`to the mixed hepatocellular-
`cholestatic pattern of injury associated with this drug [13].
`Mills et ul reported that hepatotoxicity occurred in up to 17%
`of fungal infection episodes; two cases were severe enough
`to warrant discontinuation of liposomal amphotericin B. The
`median peak concentrations of the patients‘ AST, ALP and
`bilirubin were 103 U/l (58 to 510), 582 U/1 (302 to 1362) and
`55 umol/ l (15 to 310), respectively [13].
`
`Amphotericin B lipid complex
`the first
`Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC; Abelcet),
`lipid formulation of amphotericin B to receive approval by
`the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in
`amphotericin B deoxycholate-refractory/intolerant patients,
`is comprised of amphotericin B complexed with two lipids
`in a 1:1 drug-to-lipid molar ratio [11,14]. The Liposome
`Company does not specify the frequency of liver function
`
`in ALT, AST, ALP and
`(elevations
`test abnormalities
`bilirubin) associated with this product. However, a'1_a1”89
`analysis of open—label multicenter trials of amphotericin B
`deoxycholate-refractory/intolerant
`patients
`(n
`=
`55])
`receiving ABLC for invasive fungal infections, showed a 1‘1Se
`in bilirubin occurring in 33% of evaluable cases, of whom
`25% had normal baseline values [15]. ABLC appeaf5 *0
`induce cholestatic hepatic injury in some patients, as shown
`by the significant elevations in bilirubin and ALP levels
`reported in the analysis conducted by Walsh et (11. To our
`knowledge, the pathogenesis of ABLC—induced choles-tasis
`has not been elucidated. The pivotal safety and efficacy
`analysis included 551 patients, of whom 80% had elther
`failed
`previous
`systemic
`antifungal
`therapy (mamly
`amphotericin
`B
`deoxycholate)
`or
`developed
`renal
`impairment secondary to amphotericin B deoxycholate l15l-
`l-lematological malignancy was
`the most C0mm0n
`underlying condition and was present in approximately 30%
`of cases. The mean serum bilirubin concentration increased
`by 41% from baseline at the end of therapy (p = 0.0001) and
`the mean serum ALP concentration increased by 17% from
`baseline at the end of therapy (p = 0.0015). Interestingly, the
`mean serum ALT level was not significantly altered at the
`end of treatment. Of note, patients enrolled in this study
`were diagnosed with numerous conditions such as sepsis,
`graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), veno-occlusive disease
`and end—organ damage due to chemotherapy that could
`have
`contributed
`to
`elevations
`in
`serum bilirubin
`concentrations. A similar pattern of hepatic injury was
`reported in a small retrospective analysis of 15 pediatric
`cancer patients, four (27%) of whom discontinued ABLC due
`to hyperbilirubinemia [16].
`
`Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion
`Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a colloidal
`dispersion of disc—shaped particles
`that
`received FDA
`approval for use in the US in December 1996 [11]. Rises in
`serum aminotransferases and bilirubin have occurred
`during ABCD therapy, but
`the
`true
`incidence
`of
`hepatotoxicity is confounded by the presence of competing
`causes for liver toxicity such as GVHD in many patients
`prior to treatment [1,17,18]. The incidence of elevations in
`bilirubin, ALT, AST and ALP levels associated with this
`agent in various clinical trials was 3 to 19, 1 to 5, 1 to 5 and 3
`to
`7,
`respectively
`[14]. Hepatocellular
`injury
`and
`hyperbilirubinemia
`represented
`the most
`commonly
`reported liver function test abnormalities in major clinical
`trials. Further
`research is needed to determine
`the
`mechanism responsible for its hepatotoxic effects.
`
`A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which the
`efficacy of ABCD was compared with amphotericin B
`deoxycholate for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (n =
`174) showed that hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 4.5 and 10.5%
`of ABCD- and amphotericin B-treated patients, respectively (p
`value not reported) [17]. Similarly, a phase I study of ABCD for
`the treatment of invasive fungal infections showed elevations in
`serum bilirubin concentrations in patients receiving ABCD at
`2.5 to 4.0 mg/kg/day (p = 0.002) and ABCD at 4.5 to 6.0
`mg/kg/ day (p = 0.009). Rises in AST and ALT occurred in 9
`and 13% of patients treated with ABCD, respectively, in an
`open—label trial that enrolled patients (n = 168) with systemic
`mycoses [1].
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2179 - 5/10
`
`

`
`lmidazoles
`Ketoconazole
`a well—documented complication of
`Liver
`toxicity is
`ketoconazole administration [19-0]. The hepatic reaction to
`the drug is usually limited to an asymptomatic increase in
`serum transaminases, with an estimated frequency of 2 to
`10% [20]. Ketoconazole therapy has resulted in symptomatic
`hepatitis in approximately 1:15,000 to 1:10,000 recipients
`[19o0]. The pattern of
`liver
`injury
`is most
`often
`hepatocellular, butlcholestasis and hepatocellular-cholestatic
`injury may also occur. The mechanism of hepatotoxicity
`induced by ketoconazole has not been established, but
`interference with membrane sterol synthesis and inhibition
`of hydrogen peroxidase degrading enzymes may be
`involved in promoting this reaction [210-]. The mean time-
`to-onset of hepatic injury is usually within 7 weeks of
`treatment initiation, but patients may experience hepatic
`dysfunction as early as 1.5 weeks or as late as 24 weeks of
`therapy.
`
`A cohort study that included 69,830 patients, compared the
`risk of acute hepatotoxicity among users of antifungal
`agents,
`including ketoconazole,
`itraconazole,
`fluconazole,
`griseofulvin and terbinafine, with that of non-users. The
`diagnosis of acute liver injury in the study was based on the
`presence of symptoms suggestive of liver dysfunction (ie,
`nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and/or jaundice) and
`increases in ALT, AST, ALP and bilirubin exceeding twice
`the upper limit of normal range. The relative risk of acute
`liver injury was 228.0 (95% confidence interval; range 33.9 to
`933.0) for ketoconazole, compared with the risk for non-
`users. In contrast, the relative risks of acute hepatotoxicity
`for itraconazole and terbinafine were considerably lower,
`and were shown to be 17.7 (range 2.6 to 72.6) and 4.2 (range
`0.2 to 24.9), respectively [21n].
`
`A retrospective analysis of 33 cases of ketoconazole-induced
`hepatic injury in the US showed that hepatocellular injury
`was evident in 55% of cases, whereas cholestatic injury and
`hepatocellular—cholestatic injury were evident in 15 and 27%
`of cases, respectively [190-]. One death was attributed to
`ketoconazole, with
`liver
`biopsy
`showing massive
`hepatocellular
`necrosis. Normalization of biochemical
`abnormalities and clearing of jaundice were noted 1 to 16
`weeks after discontinuation of ketoconazole therapy, with
`most patients experiencing resolution of hepatic injury
`within 7 weeks.
`
`Hepatotoxicity of antifungal agents Song 8. Deresinski 173
`
`progression or underlying immunocompromise, one patient
`died of liver failure that was judged to be associated with
`voriconazole therapy. Elevations in ALT, AST, ALI’ and
`bilirubin levels reported in clinical trials occurred at rates of
`10.7 to 18.9, 11.7 to 20.3, 10.2 to 16 and 4.3 to 19.4%,
`respectively [24]. The pattern of liver injury observed in one
`clinical
`trial
`included mixed hepatocellular—cholestatic,
`hepatocellular, or cholestatic, with hepatic injury usually
`occurring within the first 10 days of
`therapy [250-].
`Mechanisms underlying the development of hepatic injury
`associated with the use of voriconazole have not been
`elucidated.
`
`The issue of hepatotoxicity associated with the use of
`voriconazole was
`addressed by Denning et
`:11, who
`conducted an open-label study that evaluated the safety and
`efficacy of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive
`aspergillosis
`[25--]. Twenty patients (15%) experienced
`elevations in excess of 3- to 5-fold the upper limit of normal
`serum aminotransferases, ALP or bilirubin. Denning and
`colleagues suggested that liver function test abnormalities
`may have been associated with higher voriconazole serum
`concentrations, as biochemical abnormalities or hepatic
`failure occurred in six out of the 22 patients with plasma
`concentrations
`exceeding
`6000 ng/ml. Voriconazole
`undergoes
`extensive metabolism through
`numerous
`cytochrome P450 (CYP)
`isoenzymes,
`including CYPZC9,
`CYP2Cl9 and CYP3A4 [22]. Concomitant administration of
`voriconazole with inhibitors or substrates of CYPZC9,
`CYPZC19 or CYP3A4 will result in elevated voriconazole
`plasma concentrations, potentially increasing the risk of
`hepatic dysfunction in susceptible patients. In View of the
`potential
`pharmacokinetic
`drug
`interactions With
`voriconazole,
`it would be prudent to adjust the dose of
`voriconazole accordingly when it is co—administered with
`inhibitors of CYPZC9, CYPZC19 and CYP3A4.
`
`How does the hepatotoxicity profile of voriconazole fare
`against other antifungal agents? The US FDA Antiviral
`Drugs Advisory Committee reported a greater incidence of
`liver function test abnormalities among voriconazole-treated
`patients compared with fluconazole-treated patients with
`esophageal candidiasis [23]. In contrast,
`the incidence of
`hepatotoxicity among voriconazole-treated patients was
`comparable
`to
`that
`of patients who received lipid
`formulations of amphotericin B or amphotericin B (plus
`another antifungal agent) as empiric treatment for invasive
`aspergillosis.
`
`Flucanazole
`
`Triazoles
`Voriconazole
`Fluconazole may cause abnormalities of liver function tests
`(elevations in AST/ALT > 8-fold the normal levels) in 1% Of
`a
`is
`that
`triazole antifungal agent
`Voriconazole is a
`derivative of
`fluconazole [22]. Pooled data from 2090
`patients, but significant hepatic injury is rare [26]. To date,
`only four cases of fatal hepatic necrosis and seven Cases Of
`patients
`administered
`voriconazole
`in
`clinical
`and
`non-fatal hepatotoxicity due to fluconazole have been
`pharmacological trials indicated discontinuation rates of 1.4,
`1.0, 0.7 and 0.5% secondary to elevations in ALP, serum
`reported in the literature [50-,27]. Hepatocellular-cholestatic
`injury was evident in all four cases of fatal hepatitis, with
`aminotransferase (> 3-fold the upper limit of normal),
`time-to-onset of hepatic dysfunction ranging from 10 to 21
`bilirubin (> 1.5-fold the upper
`limit of normal) and
`days [50-,27]. Liver function test abnormalities observed in
`cholestatic jaundice, respectively [23]. In addition, 19 cases
`the non-fatal cases of hepatic dysfunction included (1)
`(0.9%) of hepatic failure leading to death occurred in the
`elevations in AST, ALT and bilirubin, (ii) increase in AST,
`voriconazole group during clinical and pharmacological
`trials. Although hepatic failure may have reflected disease
`and (iii) elevations in AST, ALT and ALP [5--1 The d“ra“°“
`Thi= rnanncrial ma: e‘-rrrsiznai
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2179 - 6/10
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2179 - 6/10
`
`

`
`174 Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs 2005 Vol 6 No 2
`
`therapy prior to the occurrence of non-fatal hepatic
`of
`dysfunction ranged from 4 to 34 days. Of note,
`the
`hepatotoxicity observed in two of the fatal hepatic necrosis
`cases and three of the non-fatal cases could have been
`attributed to the use of concomitant potentially hepatotoxic
`drugs
`(eg,
`antituberculosis
`agents
`and
`cimetidine).
`However,
`the
`sequential
`association with fluconazole
`administration and withdrawal pointed to this agent as the
`most likely cause of liver injury [5--]. The mechanism of
`fluconazole-induced hepatic injury is unknown, but is likely
`to differ from other triazole antifungals, as it is primarily
`excreted unchanged in the urine [26].
`
`Itraconazole
`Asymptomatic elevations in ALT, AST, ALP and total
`bilirubin have been reported with itraconazole use in clinical
`trials, with rates of 2 to 3, l to 2, 1
`to 2 and 4 to 6%,
`respectively [28]. To date,
`the FDA has received and
`reviewed at least 24 cases of liver failure attributed to the
`use of
`itraconazole in the US, with patterns of injury
`manifested
`as
`cholestatic
`or
`hepatocellular—cholestatic
`[29,30-]. Hepatic dysfunction can occur as early as 5 days
`after
`treatment
`initiation to as late as several months
`[29,31,32]. Recovery from hepatitis may be delayed in some
`patients; resolution of hepatotoxicity did not occur until 5
`months after discontinuation of treatment in one patient
`who developed severe cholestasis related to intraconazole
`[29].
`In addition to causing prolonged cholangiopathy,
`intraconazole use may lead to the development of chronic
`cholestatic syndrome for patients with prior exposure to this
`agent. One study described a patient who developed this
`syndrome two years after experiencing hepatitis related to
`therapy with intraconazole [32]. The exact mechanism of
`itraconazole-induced hepatotoxicity is unknown.
`
`Echinocandin
`
`caspofungin acetate
`Caspofungin acetate has been shown in some clinical studies
`to have
`the potential
`to induce liver
`function test
`abnormalities, but to no greater degree than that observed
`with fluconazole or amphotericin B deoxycholate [33,34].
`Phase II clinical trials in 263 individuals showed that 2.3% of
`caspofungin-treated patients
`experienced elevations
`in
`serum bilirubin concentrations exceeding 3-fold the upper
`limit of normal, but the incidence of hyperbilirubinemia did
`not differ from that observed in fluconazole—treated patients
`[33].
`In addition, a pooled analysis of data from three
`double-blind, randomized studies showed that elevated AST
`and ALT levels occurred in 10.5 to 10.8% and in 10.8 to 13%
`of patients receiving caspofungin at 50 to 70 mg/ day,
`respectively [34]. The incidence of AST/ALT abnormalities
`did not differ between caspofungin—treated patients and
`amphotericin
`B
`deoxycholate
`or
`fluconazole—treated
`patients. At present, the pattern and time of onset of hepatic
`injury,
`along with the pathophysiological mechanism
`responsible for hepatic biochemical abnormalities associated
`with caspofungin are unknown.
`
`theoretically low risk of drug if1f€TflCt1°115 W111‘
`the
`caspofungin given its
`19
`_
`_
`file’
`ther? 15
`evidence of enhanced hepa’t0‘f0><iC1tY W111‘ Coricomltant
`administration of this agent with ciclosfxmn and hlposomal
`amphotericin B [35,36]. In a study of four healthy V0 unteers,
`transient elevations in ALT levels to 2- to 3-fold the IIPPQ1
`limit of normal occurred in three individuals 1 day after the
`addition of ciclosporin to caspofungin. The individuals
`received 9 days of caspofungin therapy (70 1118/C13)’ 1") P1101‘
`to the addition of ciclosporin on day 10 (W70 doses ‘_’f 3
`mg/kg). Moreover,
`in the same study,
`t'_WO Out 01 918111
`individuals who received caspofungin (33 1118/ C1513’) f°1 3
`days plus two doses of ciclosporin (3 I118/kg
`exhibited ALT levels above the upper limit of normal on the
`second day. A retrospective evaluation of the C0r1C0mItaI1t
`use of caspofungin with ciclosporin (40%) 01'
`taC1°11111“5
`(60%) in organ transplant patients (mostly.lung transplafit)
`revealed hepatic biochemical abnormality In two out Of .19
`episodes of caspofungin use [37]. Elevations in ALT (iW1C€
`the upper
`limit of normal) or y-glutamyl
`transferase
`occurred in the
`two patients, but other hepatotoxic
`medications, such as voriconazole and amphotericin B, may
`have induced the biochemical abnormalities. Consequently,
`the prescribing information for caspofungin States that
`concomitant administration of this drug and ciclosporin
`should be reserved for patients for whom the potential
`benefit outweighs the potential risk [35].
`
`A retrospective evaluation of 30 patients with Aspergillus
`pneumonia refractory to liposomal amphotericin [3, showed
`that the addition of caspofungin to this agent was associated
`with mild elevation of ALP levels in 30% of the patients
`(degree of elevation not specified). The underly

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket