throbber
1961
`
`OCTOBER - DECEMBER
`
`VOL. 134
`
`THE JOURNAL OF
`
`P H A R M A C 0 L 0 G Y
`
`AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
`
`Founded by
`John J. Abel
`1909
`
`Official Publication of the American Society for
`Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Inc.
`
`EDITOR
`N. C. Moran
`
`ASSISTANT EDITOR
`M. deV. Cotten
`
`INDEX EDI'l'Olt
`R. M. Isenberger
`
`SECRETARY OF
`PUBLICATIONS
`Eleanor Bates
`
`EDITORIAL BOARD
`Julius Axelrod
`H.K.Beecher
`E.F.Domino
`W.W.Douglas
`K.P.DuBois
`Sydney Ellis
`J.R.Fouts
`M.E.Friedkin
`R.F.Furchgott
`L.I.Goldberg
`P.B.Hagen
`
`EDITORS FOR SPECIFIC FIELDS
`Avram Goldstein: Biochemical and
`Cellular Pharmacology
`J.J.Burns: Drug Metabolism and
`Disposition
`G.H.Mudge: Renal Pharmacology and
`Electrolytes
`M.deV. Cotten: Cardiovascular
`Pharmacology
`R.P. Ahlquist: Autonomic
`Pharmacology
`H.L. Borison: Neuropharmacology
`P.B.Dews: Behavioral Pharmacology
`Louis Lasagna: Clinical Pharmacology
`
`H.C.Hodge
`D.J.Jenden
`K.F .Killam
`J.P.Long
`H.G.Mandel
`T.H.Maren
`W.R.Martin
`P.L.Munson
`Barbara R. Rennick
`W.K.Riker
`Jay Roberts
`P.R.Saunders
`
`F.W.Schueler
`A.M.Shanes
`P.A.Shore
`C.C.Smith
`J.L.Strominger
`H.H.Swain
`E.J.Walaszek
`E.Leong Way
`T.C.West
`D.M.Woodbury.
`L.A.Woods
`J.A.Zapp,Jr.
`
`BOARD OF PUBLICATIONS TRUSTEES
`
`Otto Krayer, Chairman; K.H.Beyer, Lawrence Peters, G.B.Koelle, N.C. Moran
`
`BALTIK>RE, MARYLAND
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2130 - 1/7
`
`

`
`8626
`
`EVALUATION OF BORON COMPOUNDS FOR USE IN NEUTRON CAPTURE
`THERAPY OF BRAIN TUMORS. I. ANIMAL INVESTIGATIONS1
`
`A. H. SOLOWAY, R. L. WRIGHT AND J. R. MESSER
`Neurosurgical Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical
`School, Boston, Massachusetts
`
`Received for publication March 10, 1961
`
`The neutron capture irradiation of intra(cid:173)
`cranial neoplasms using nonradioactive boron10
`was first proposed by Sweet and Javid (1952).
`For this form of therapy to be successful, it is
`essential that there be a high differential con(cid:173)
`centration of boron between the tumor and the
`adjacent normal brain. Under local bombard(cid:173)
`ment with thermal neutrons of the area con(cid:173)
`taining residual tumor, the neoplastic tissue
`would be selectively destroyed by the following
`nuclear reaction: boron10 + neutron1-->(boron11)-+
`lithium7 + alpha particle + 2.4 MEV. The
`alpha particle and lithium atom emitted travel a
`maximum of nine microns in tissue, thereby
`releasing this destructive energy only in the
`immediate vicinity of the cell containing the
`original disrupted atom of boron10•
`The feasibility of this form of therapy is based
`upon a difference in permeability between normal
`and neoplastic tissues. Fortunately, there is a
`breakdown of the normal blood-brain barrier
`(BBB) in brain tumors (Moore, 1947) and
`consequently many substances which are re(cid:173)
`stricted in their passage into the brain enter the
`tumor readily (Selverstone et al., 1949; Sweet,
`1951).
`Of 125 boron compounds screened in mice
`(Soloway, 1958; Soloway et al., 1960; Soloway
`and Gordon, 1960; Thiry, 1958), fifteen have
`given higher glioma: brain boron ratios than
`were observed with borate (Locksley and Sweet,
`1954). In the present study, ten of these com(cid:173)
`pounds were compared with each other and with
`boric acid to ascertain which compounds deserved
`additional study on the basis of tumor: brain
`ratios and toxicity in mice. Of the five more
`
`promising compounds, two have been tested in
`cats to determine
`toxic manifestations and
`tissue concentrations. This was done prior to
`their evaluation in terminal patients (Sweet
`et al., unpublished).
`
`METHODS. In other studies (Soloway et al.,
`1960), it has been shown that C3H mice bearing
`subcutaneously transplanted gliomasl provide a
`useful means of assaying the tumor:brain ratios
`of various boron compounds. The present variety
`of glioma, an ependymoma, was used throughout
`the investigations. The methods used for trans(cid:173)
`planting the tumor and determining the boron
`content in tissues have been described by Soloway
`et al. (1960). The animals were injected intra(cid:173)
`venously or intraperitoneally usually under ether
`anesthesia with doses of from 70 to 300 mg of
`boron per kilogram of body weight (mg B/kg).
`They were sacrificed by ether inhalation after
`periods from 15 minutes to 3 hours and various
`tissues were weighed and analyzed for boron
`content.
`In general, the toxicity of the compound which
`proved most favorable was then evaluated by
`intravenous injection of the aqueous solutions into
`the tail veins of white Swiss albino mice. Survivors
`were followed for 72 hours. The solutions were
`prepared in a concentrated form and at a pH range
`of 7.35 to 7.40, whenever possible, to minimize
`volume and pH as factors in the toxicity deter(cid:173)
`minations. However, many compounds were
`soluble in high concentration only in an al(cid:173)
`kaline medium.
`The more promising compounds were tested
`more thoroughly by intravenous and intracarotid
`injection in cats anesthetized with pentobarbital.
`The latter route was included in the event that
`intracarotid administration of boron compounds
`
`1 This research was supported by a grant from
`the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under Con(cid:173)
`tract No. AT(30-1)-1093 and by the National Can(cid:173)
`cer Institute, U. S. Public Health Service Grant
`No. C-3174 (C2) Rad.
`
`2 Dr. D. M. Perese of the Department of Neuro(cid:173)
`surgery at the Roswell Park Memorial Institute in
`Buffalo, New York, very generously supplied us
`with the original subcutaneously grown ependy(cid:173)
`moma.
`117
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2130 - 2/7
`
`

`
`118
`
`SOLOWAY ET AL.
`
`Vol. 134
`
`becomes the preferable method of injection for
`neutron capture therapy. Continuous electro(cid:173)
`encephalographic and electrocardiographic trac(cid:173)
`ings were made and vital signs followed closely.
`Urinary excretion of several compounds or their
`metabolites was measured by collecting urine
`with indwelling catheters and analyzing aliquots
`for boron content. At intervals of from 15 minutes
`to several days after injection, serial blood
`samples were taken and boron analyses were
`performed on them as well as on other tissues of
`each animal. Vital organs were then examined
`for histologic changes.
`
`RESULTS AND DxscusSION. Mouse studies.
`Tumor:brain boron ratios in mice were approxi(cid:173)
`mately the same whether injected intravenously
`or intraperitoneally. Consequently, in table 1,
`the average boron ratio listed for the ten com(cid:173)
`pounds at the times specified includes mice
`injected by either of these routes of administra(cid:173)
`tion. At each time interval 3 to 10 mice were
`used and from these data, standard deviations
`of each group were calculated to ascertain the
`variation in this study. Though the deviations
`were large, it was apparent that the ratios for all
`of these compounds were appreciably greater
`than was observed in this laboratory with the
`borate ion (Locksley and Sweet, 1954) and
`
`confirmed in this present study. This is especially
`true at times greater than 1 hour after injection,
`since with borate at such times a ratio of only
`one was observed.
`Since all of the compounds described here
`appeared to be quite promising from the stand(cid:173)
`point of ratio, it was essential to compare them
`with regard to toxicity. The LD50 values of each
`of these ten compounds as well as of boric acid
`are listed in table 2. Of those screened the follow(cid:173)
`ing five, based on boron content, were the most
`satisfactory from toxicity considerations: 1) m(cid:173)
`Boronosuccinanilic acid. 2) 3-Amino-4-carboxy(cid:173)
`benzeneboronic acid. 3) 2-Acetamidobenzene-1,
`4-diboronic acid. 4) o-(2-Carboxy-2-acetamido(cid:173)
`ethyl)-benzeneboronic acid. 5) Sodium perhydro(cid:173)
`decaborate. Of these five, m-boronosuccinanilic
`acid, 3-amino-4-carboxybenzeneboronic and more
`recently sodium perhydrodecaborate have been
`investigated more extensively in larger animals
`and finally in terminal glioxna patients (Sweet
`et al., unpublished). In view of its encouragingly
`low toxicity based on boron content, sodium
`perhydrodecaborate would appear to be the
`compound of choice. Doses of 50 mg B/kg have
`been administered to man with no untoward
`effects. Surprisingly enough, it is a boron hydride.
`
`TABLE 1
`Tumor/brain boron ratios in mice• at various intervals after administration of boron compounds
`
`Compound
`
`1St
`
`30
`
`60
`
`120
`
`180
`
`8.3 ± 2.1
`9.1 ± 2.0
`
`-
`6.9 ± 1.1 6.5 ± 2.1
`6.5 ± 0.9 5.8 ± 2.4 5.2 ± 3.2
`
`6.0 ± 2.2 11.0 :1:: 2.5
`6.4 ± 2.2
`6.8 ± 2.3
`5.7 ± 1.7
`7.8 ± 1.2
`4.6 ± 1.7
`7.0 ± 1.5
`4.2 ± 2.8
`4.9 ± 1.1
`
`7.2 ± 0.6 3.7 ± 2.3 3.5 ± 2.7
`6.4 ± 2.5 4.9 ± 1.2 3.3 ± 1.2
`7.3 ± 1.3 4.4 ± 1.0 5.2 ± 0.6
`7.3 ± 1.7 3.9 ± 0.2 4.0 ± 2.3
`5.4 ± 3.5 4.4 ± 1.0 4.4 ± 2.2
`
`6.1 ± 1.3
`p-Borono-phenylalaninet
`2-Acetamidobenzene-1, 4-diboronic 8.2 ± 2.4
`acid
`m-Ureidobenzeneboronic acid
`m-Boronosuccinanilic acid
`m-Carboxybenzeneboronic acid
`p-Carboxybenzeneboronic acid
`2-Nitrobenzene-1 , 4-diboronic
`acid
`o-(2-Carboxy -2-acetamidoethyl)-
`benzeneboronic acidt
`3-Amino-4-carboxybenzene-
`boronic acid
`Sodium perhydrodecaborate§
`
`4.8 ± 2.4
`
`6.9 ± 1.8
`
`3.9 ± 1.2
`
`7.7 ± 2.6
`
`6.5 ± 2.6 3.4 ± 1.3 2.8 ± 0.6
`
`7.2 ± 1.5
`
`8.5 ± 2.2 6.7 ± 1.6 7.0 ± 0.8
`
`5.4 ± 1.1
`
`7.2 ± 2.2 5.7 ± 1.5 7.3 ± 2.1
`
`• Ratios are recorded with the standard deviations; the mice received doses of 140 to 300 mg B/kg.
`t Time of sacrifice in minutes after injection.
`t Dr. H. R. Snyder, Professor of Chemistry at the University of Illinois, kindly supplied these com(cid:173)
`pounds.
`§Dr. M. F. Hawthorne of the Redstone Arsenal Division of the Rohm and Haas Company kindly
`furnished triethylammonium perhydrodecaborate and the procedure for preparing the sodium salt.
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2130 - 3/7
`
`

`
`1961.
`
`BORON COMPOUNDS AND BRAIN TUMORS
`
`119'
`
`TABLE 2
`Mouse toxicity study
`
`pH
`
`LDSOt
`
`Toxic Signs of Near Lethal Dose
`
`Compound
`
`Boric acid
`
`3-Amino-4-carboxybenzeneboronic
`acid
`
`p-Boronophenylalanine
`
`m-U reidobenzeneboronic acid
`
`p-Carboxybenzeneboronic acid
`
`m-Carboxybenzeneboronic acid
`
`2-Nitrobenzene-1 ,4-diboronic acid
`
`No.
`Mice•
`- -
`
`12
`
`34
`21
`16
`
`25
`
`If lie mcB/llg
`6.9 2.11
`375
`
`7.4 2.42
`430
`270
`8.8 1.52
`9.4 1.24
`220
`- - - - ---
`8.1 3.29
`200
`
`9.5 2.06
`125
`16
`- - - - - ----
`10.0 1.52
`80
`11
`- -- ----
`100
`10.0 1.02
`- -- ----
`9.4 1.74
`115
`- - - ----
`7.4 2.56
`170
`-- - ----
`9.3 1.68
`175
`
`12
`
`25
`
`20
`
`34
`
`mmol/llg
`34.6 Seizures, respiratory depres-
`sion, ataxia, diarrhea
`
`39.7
`25.0
`20.3
`
`18.5 Seizures, respiratory depres-
`sion
`
`11.5
`
`7.4 Seizures, respiratory depres-
`sion
`
`4.6 Seizures, respiratory depres-
`sion
`
`10.6 Seizures, diarrhea, respiratory
`depression
`
`15.7 None
`
`8.1 Seizures, respiratory depres-
`sion
`
`17.5 None
`
`11.5 Seizures, respiratory depres-
`sion
`
`23.1 None
`
`- - - ----
`190
`7.4 4.09
`- -- ----
`10.6 2.54
`250
`--- ----
`7.5 5.72
`250
`- - - - ---
`6.3 Seizures
`11
`7.2 1.04
`Sodium perhydrodecaborate
`685
`* The numbers of mice refer to those used in the LDOO range and not to the total number of mice
`required for the toxicity study.
`t The values are accurate to within ± 25 mg B/kg.
`
`m-Boronosuccinanilic acid
`
`2-Acetamidobenzene-1 ,4-diboronic
`acid
`
`o- (2-Carboxy-2-acetamidoethyl)-
`benzeneboronic acid
`
`48
`
`19
`
`14
`
`The literature is replete with information con(cid:173)
`cerning the high toxicity of such materials
`(Hill et al., 1958; Walton et al., 1955; Lowe and
`Freiman, 1957), but the high chemical stability
`of the decaborate ion, B,oH,o- (Hawthorne, un(cid:173)
`published) is possibly responsible for its biological
`inactivity.
`In assessing the toxicity of these compounds,
`it became apparent that the volume of the
`injected solution was not a major factor provided
`it did not exceed such large volumes as 2.5 to 3
`ml per mouse. Interestingly enough, such vol-
`
`umes were well tolerated when injected intra(cid:173)
`venously over a 10- to 20-second period. The pH
`of the material was of greater concern since even
`small volumes (less than 0.4 ml) of alkaline
`solutions produced respiratory depression, sei(cid:173)
`zures, and often death. To determine the effect of
`pH upon the toxicity of these boron compounds,
`we measured the LD50 for boric acid solutions
`at varying hydrogen ion concentrations (table 2).
`As might be anticipated, the lowest toxicity was
`attained at the physiological pH, increasing on
`either side of this value. By raising the pH to
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2130 - 4/7
`
`

`
`120
`
`SOLOWAY ET AL.
`
`Vol. 134.
`
`9.4, the toxicity of the boric acid solution ap(cid:173)
`proximately doubled. Similar findings of the
`effect of pH have been reported recently by
`White (1960) with regard to the toxicity of
`nitrogen mustards.
`
`TABLE 3
`Average boron concentrations in cat tissues* in mg
`B/kg
`Boric Acid
`
`Optic chiasm
`Sciatic nerve
`Cerebellum
`Cerebrum-cor-
`tex
`White matter
`Brain stem
`Spinal cord
`Pituitary
`Feces (rectum)
`
`mg B/kg
`
`375-415
`360--400
`320-410
`3()()-390
`
`Kidney
`Heart
`Skull
`Liver
`
`3()()-330 Muscle
`Scalp
`280-340
`230-270
`Fat
`2()()-260
`Blood
`340
`
`mgB/kg
`
`5.'i<Hi20
`475-550
`4()()-520
`450
`
`415-465
`360
`60-80
`143G-500
`
`Cat studies. Preliminary to the injection of
`m-boronosuccinanilie acid and 3-amino-4-car(cid:173)
`boxybenzeneboronic acid in man, their toxic
`effects as well as lethal doses of boric acid were
`determined in cats. A comparison study of the
`toxicity of these aromatic boronic acids to boric
`acid would provide some intimation as to what
`might be an initial safe dose of these compounds
`in man. Much is known regarding the pharma(cid:173)
`cology of boric acid in man (Pfeiffer et al., 1945;
`Goodbloom, 1953; Locksley and Farr, 1955;
`McNally and Rust, 1928; Watson, 1945; Con(cid:173)
`nelly et al., 1958) and this is the reason for its
`use as a reference standard.
`Boric acid in intravenous doses of 600 mg
`B/kg produced generalized seizures, severe
`diarrhea, and ataxia in 2 cats. Occurrence of
`diarrhea after parenteral administration sug(cid:173)
`gested the possibility that the intestinal wall was
`actively excreting the substance. Fecal specimens
`were taken from the large intestine and showed
`high concentrations of boron, corroborating
`
`BEFORE
`
`INJECTION DURING
`
`INJECTION
`
`5 MINUTES AFTER
`
`CAT A
`
`R-PO
`
`R-FP ~ ~ ~
`~ ~ ~
`
`I 50 mv
`
`,__.. sec.
`
`CAT 8
`
`R-FP ~ ------
`
`~
`
`""''""'
`
`R-PO ~ ~ ~
`,__.. sec.
`I 50 mv
`
`FIG. 1. Electroencephalographic tracings.
`Leads: R-FP = fronto-parietal; R-PO = right parieto-occipital.
`Cat A received 3-amino-4-carboxybenzeneboronic acid, 40 mg Bjkg, by injection into the right com(cid:173)
`mon carotid artery after ligation of the facial portion of the external carotid artery. The pH of the solu(cid:173)
`tion was 8.1 and it contained 3 mg B/ml. A generalized seizure and respiratory arrest ensued.
`Cat B received m-boronosuccinanilic acid, 40 mg B/kg. by the same route. This solution contained
`5 mg B/ml and the pH was 7.4. It was well tolerated. The animal was sacrificed 110 hours later, and
`there was no sign of toxicity.
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2130 - 5/7
`
`

`
`1961
`
`BORON COMPOUNDS AND BRAIN TUMORS
`
`121
`
`this hypothesis. Thus boric acid is excreted both
`by the kidney and the intestine, the latter route
`becoming more apparent at higher dose levels.
`In table 3 are listed the boron concentrations in
`other body tissues of these 2 cats. As might be
`expected, the kidney has the highest concentra(cid:173)
`tion, and at this lethal dose, large amounts
`appear also in brain, heart, liver, and muscle.
`Fat, on the other hand, has one of the lower
`values.
`3-Amino-4-carboxybenzeneboronic acid in a
`dose of 40 mg B/kg was injected either intra(cid:173)
`venously or via the carotid artery in 3 cats.
`Carotid injection of the solution at pH 8.1 was
`poorly tolerated. Electroencephalographic trac(cid:173)
`ings were made during these injections and
`showed spiking patterns on the EEG (fig. 1),
`generalized seizures, and respiratory depression
`in the animals.a Intravenous injections, however,
`were well tolerated. In table 4 are shown the
`tissue levels of boron at varying intervals after
`injection. Kidney and scalp had high boron
`concentrations whereas normal brain was in(cid:173)
`variably low.
`m-Boronosuccinanilic acid, the next compound
`considered, goes readily into a solution containing
`10 mg B/ml at pH 7.4. This is in contrast to the
`foregoing compound, 3-amino-4-carboxybenzene(cid:173)
`boronic acid, which is soluble to the extent of
`only 3 mg B/ml even at pH 8.1. Injection of
`m-boronosuccinanilic acid in a dose of 86 mg
`B /kg via the carotid artery produced a marked
`alteration in the EEG together with respiratory
`arrest which failed to respond to assisted respira(cid:173)
`tion. Death occurred shortly after the injection.
`Doses of 40 mg B/kg, however, at a concentration
`of 5 to 10 mg B/ml were well tolerated by both
`intravenous and intracarotid routes.
`Tissue concentrations are listed for 3-amino-4-
`carboxybenzeneboronic acid and for m-borono(cid:173)
`succinanilic acid in table 4. One cat was utilized
`at each
`time for 3-amino-4-carboxybenzene(cid:173)
`boronic acid and at least 2 cats for each interval
`with m-boronosuccinanilic acid. Of
`special
`interest is the fact that normal brain shows a
`very low content of either agent independent of
`the route of administration. The latter compound
`in fact gave comparable results whether by
`intravenous or
`intracarotid
`administration
`a Wright (1960) has observed that injection of
`alkaline solutions via the carotid artery produced
`seizures, damage to the blood-brain barrier and
`respiratory depression.
`
`TABLE 4
`Average boron concentrations in cat tissues in
`mgB/kg
`
`3-Amino-4-carboxybenzeneboronic acid
`
`Scalp
`Muscle
`Skull
`Brain
`Pituitary
`Optic nerve
`Intestine
`Liver
`Kidney
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`I
`
`30min
`
`160
`30
`50
`5
`100
`40
`60
`70
`180
`
`60min
`
`120 min
`
`190
`20
`20
`4
`-
`30
`50
`110
`360
`
`70
`20
`20
`7
`20
`10
`30
`30
`130
`
`m-Boronosuccinanilic acid
`
`IS min
`
`60min
`30min
`90min
`540min
`- - - - - - - - - ---
`90-100 130-150 55-60 55-65 Trace
`7-13 Trace
`9-11
`15-25 15-25
`20-25 15-20 15-25 1Q-20
`10
`75-105 40-60 3o-40 30-35 Trace
`Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace
`2Q-40
`25-35 25-35
`20
`10
`-
`Trace
`0
`0
`0
`-
`-
`-
`20-25
`20-25
`27Q-330 25o-280 25o-320 60-65
`5
`4o-50 40-60 25-35 15-30 Trace
`25--40 20-30 Trace
`50-55 60--70
`4Q-45 5o-60 15-25 1Q-15
`0
`50--65 60-65 25-35 20-35
`2
`
`4o-55 40-60 15-25 15-20
`25-40 3Q-35 15-20 1Q-20
`-
`-
`5-15 1Q-15
`-
`7-10
`1Q-15
`5-7
`25-35 4Q-45 1Q-20 1Q-15
`5o-60 55-60 20-45 1Q-20
`
`-
`-
`
`3
`2
`
`3
`0
`
`Scalp
`Muscle
`Skull
`Dura
`Brain
`Pituitary
`Lens
`Retina
`Kidney
`Liver
`Intestine
`Adrenal
`Lung
`Lymph
`node
`Spleen
`Fat
`Feces
`Heart
`Thyroid
`
`(Wright and Soloway, unpublished) and con(cid:173)
`sequently, values in table 4 represent values for
`2 cats or range of values for 3 cats at each time
`interval following injection. Kidney concentra(cid:173)
`tions remained at a very high level even several
`hours after injection but blood samples taken 8
`or 9 hours after administration of these doses
`showed only trace amounts of boron. As occurs
`with the 3 compounds, boric acid (Locksley and
`Sweet, 1954), p-carboxybenzeneboronic acid and
`triisopropanolamine borate (Soloway and Gor(cid:173)
`don, 1960), these agents, 3-amino-4-carboxy-
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2130 - 6/7
`
`

`
`122
`
`SOLOWAY ET AL.
`
`Vol. 134
`
`benzeneboronic acid and m-boronosuccinanilic
`acid, are rapidly excreted by the kidney. They
`all behave in this respect in a similar manner,
`namely as "low-threshold substances" in a class
`with urea and sulfate.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Ten organic boron compounds and boric acid
`have been evaluated in mice for toxicity. Tumor:
`brain boron ratios have been studied in animals
`with subcutaneous transplanted gliomas.
`Two of the more promising compounds, 3-
`amino-4-carboxybenzeneboronic acid and m(cid:173)
`boronosuccinanilic acid have been studied in
`cats by both
`intravenous and
`intracarotid
`injection. Tissue concentrations have been
`determined.
`
`to
`AcKNOWLEDGMENTS. The authors wish
`thank Dr. William H. Sweet, Associate Pro(cid:173)
`fessor of Surgery at the Harvard Medical School
`and Chief of the Neurosurgical Service of the
`Massachusetts General Hospital, for his great
`interest and encouragement during this entire
`investigation. The technical assistance of Miss
`Beverly Whitman, Miss Winnie Crane, Mrs.
`
`Cynthia Provost, and Mrs. Mary Lee Bossert is
`gratefully acknowledged.
`
`REFERENCES
`CONNELLY, J.P., CRAWFORD.J J.D. AND SOLOWAY,
`A. H.: New Engl. J. Med.:~69: 1123, 1958.
`GOODBLOOM, R. G.: J. Pediat. a: 631z.!953.
`HILL, w. H., LEVINSK.AS, G. J. AND MERRILL, J.
`M.: Arch. industr. Hlth 17: 124, 1958.
`LocJtsLEY, H. B. AND FARR, L. E.: THIS JouRNAL
`114: 484, 1955.
`LocJtSLEY, H. B. AND SwEET, W. H.: Proc. Soc.
`exp. Bioi., N.Y. 86:56, 1954.
`LowE, H. I. AND FREIMAN, G.: Arch.industr. Hlth
`16: 523, 1957.
`McNALLY, W. D. AND RusT, C. A.: J. Amer. med.
`Ass. 90: 382, 1928.
`MooRE, G. E.: Science 106:130, 1947.
`PFEIFFER, c. C., HALLMAN, L. F. AND GERSH, 1.:
`J. Amer. med. Ass.lZS: 26!!,.1945.
`SELVERSTONE, B., SWEET, W. H. AND ROBINSON,
`C. V.: Ann. Surg. 130: 64~..1._1949.
`SoLOWAY, A. H.: Science~= 1572, 1958.
`SoLOWAY, A. H. AND GoRDON, D. S.: J. Neuro(cid:173)
`path. 19: 415, 1960.
`SOLOWAY, A. H., WHITMAN, B. ANDMESSER,J. R.:
`THIS JouRNAL 129:310, 1960.
`SwEET, W. H.: New Engl. J. Med. 146:875, 1951.
`SwEET, W. H. AND JAVID, M.: J. Neurosurg. 9:
`200, 1952.
`TmRY, S.: N eurochirurgia 1: 106, 1958.
`WALTON, R. P., RICHARDSON, J. A. AND BRODIE,
`0. J.: Tms JoURNAL 114: 367, 1955.
`WATSON,E. H.: J. Amer. med. Ass.129:332, 1945.
`WHITE, L. P.: Science 131:1041,1960.
`WRIGHT, R. L.: Ann. Surg. 10: 941, 1960.
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2130 - 7/7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket