throbber
CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 1/19
`
`

`
`ED1'IDR—IN—CHIEF
`
`SCOTT M. GRU NDY
`
`LEWIS I. GIDEZ, EXECUTIVE EDITOR
`
`PATRICIA D. THOMPSON, Edzilarial A.I.rI's£aIII, DEIIEI
`
`JOAN C. REILLY, Copy Editor; Betharda
`
`WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL
`LAWRENCE CHAN
`
`JOHN M. DIE1‘SCHY
`WILLIAM C. DUANE
`GREGORY T. EVERSON
`
`ASSOCIATE EDITORS
`HELEN H.
`I-IOEES
`BARBARA V. HOwARD
`
`RICHARD L. JACKSON
`ISHWARLAL JIALAL
`HENRY C. MOGILL, JR.
`
`HENRY POWNALI.
`ARTHUR A. SPECTOR
`GLORIA LENA VEGA
`ROBERT K. YU
`
`ADVISORY BOARD
`
`EDITORIAL BOARD
`
`I-IAVEL, CHAIR
`RICHARD J.
`GERARD AILHAUD
`
`JAN L. BRESLOw
`ALAN M. FOGELMAN
`
`JEFFREY I. GORDON
`SCOTT M. GRUNDY
`
`JUDITH A. K. HARMONY
`ANA JONAS
`ROBERT W. MAHLEY
`
`JULIAN B. MARSII
`PAUL J. NESTEL
`KAARE R. NORUM
`MICHAEL C. PHILLIPS
`
`JAMES SCOTT
`DONALD M. SMALL
`GERD UTERMANN
`DENNIS E. VANCE
`TAMIO YAMAKAwA
`
`LIPID RESJEARCH, INC.
`
`I-1OwARD A. EDSR, PRESIDENT
`RICHARD J. HAVEL
`JULES I-IIRSCH
`DANIEL STEINEERG
`DONALD B. ZILVERSMIT
`
`JOHN J. ALBERS
`AUBIE ANGEL
`DAVID W. BILHEIMER
`ROBERT BITTMAN
`CONRAD BLUM
`WILLIAM A. BRADLEY
`
`HOwARD L. BROCRMAN, JR.
`W. VIRGIL BROWN
`ALAN CHAIT
`ALLEN D. COOPER
`DAVID G. CORNwELL
`LINDA CURTISS
`ROGER A. DAVIS
`PETER A. EOwARDS
`PHOEEE E. FIELDING
`TRUDY M. FORTE
`DAVID M. FOSTER
`SANDRA H. GIANTUROO
`HENRY N. GINSBERG
`
`JANE M. CLICK
`MARGARET E. HARERLAND
`
`DAVID P. HAJJAR
`WILLIAM R. HA2zARD
`HELEN HOBBS
`ALAN F. HOFMANN
`KARL Y. HOSTETLER
`THOMAS L.
`INNERARITY
`
`NORMAN B. JAVITT
`
`SOTIRIOS K. KARATHANASIS
`
`FRED KERN, JR.
`WILLIAM E. M. LANDS
`RENEE C. LE BOEUF
`KENNETH L. LUSREY
`
`JOHN ORAM
`ROBERT H. PALMER
`
`JOHN S. PATTON
`RAY C. PJTTMAN
`A. CATHARINE ROSS
`GEORGE H. ROTHELAT
`DAVID W. RUSSELL
`GERALD SALEN
`GUSTAV SCHDNFELD
`MICHAE-L C. SCHOTZ
`
`JERE P. SEGREST
`MICHAEL SINENSKY
`LOUIS C. SMITH
`
`JAN S. PYRER
`JOHN B. SWANEY
`CHARLES S. SWINDELI.
`ALAN TALL
`
`JOHN M. TAYLOR
`GUY A. THOMPSON, JR.
`KARL H. WEISGRAEER
`DAVID L. WILLIAMS
`
`JOSEPH WITZTLIM
`RANDALL D. WOOD
`
`The JOURNAL DI-' LIPID RESE.AR(‘.H is pLll')li.‘3l'ICCl monthly for the purpose of pmmoting basic I‘eSearr.lI in the lipul
`field. The JOURNAL publishes Original artitilesi and invited rcvirrws dealing with the I.‘hemiSII'y. biochemistry, aml
`Inetabnlism of lipids including morphological and clinical Studies.
`Manuscripts Should be submitted to SI.-.OII M. Grundy, Editorvin-Chiel‘. JOURNAL Or LIPID RESEARCH, Uraiw-Iv+E!‘.
`Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Y-3306. 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75235-9052.
`Please see inside back eover for “InstrtII:IiOnS tO Authors."
`
`The JOURNAL. OF LIPID RESEARCH {ISSN 0022-2275) is published monthly by Lipid .RC5¢C£'.il‘l.‘.l1. lnc., 9850 Rnclu-'i|lI'
`Pike, Bethesda. Maryland 20814-3998. StIbScripIiOn rates:
`lnstittitional, 52-it} per year; Personal, 580 per year.
`Student. $35 per year; Postage diflerentials: Other countries + $35 per year. Single issue, $22. All SII|JSI'I'i|)lifI|1"?
`Entered On a calendar year basis only and payable in atdvance in 1.1.3. funds by a check drawn On a L-'.S. bank III" 15',‘
`intI:I‘r1aIiOIIal money Order. Subscriptions and Orders Should l‘.Ie Sent IO IhcJOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH, SUl35(fI"l|I[lHtI
`Department, 9ti5(l Rockville Pike. Bethesda. Maryland 20814-3998. SI:-:.‘.OIId class postage is paid at
`.Bt'[l‘J.I.‘Stl£1
`Maryland, and at additional mailing Ofhccs. Postmaster, send address changes In IheJO1IRNAL Or LIPID RESE.-\R.I:H.
`Subscription Department, 9550 Rnckville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-3993.
`
`Copyriglit @ 1992 by Lipid Research,
`
`[mu Printed in the United States Of Amerit.-.a.
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, lPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 2/19
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 2/19
`
`

`
`CONTENTS
`
`JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
`
`ezzzsra
`NOVEMBER 1992
`
`Amplified Titles
`
`i
`
`Special Article. The discovery and development of
`HMG-COA reductase inhibitors. A. Endo
`1569
`
`Familial apolipoprotein E deficiency and type III
`hypcrlipoproteinemia due to a premature stop
`eodon in the apolipoprotein E gene.
`P. Lohse,
`H. B. Brewer Ill, M. S. Meng, S. l. Skarlatos,
`C.
`l..aRosa, and H. B. Brewer, _]r.
`1533
`
`12ot~Hydroxylase activity in human liver and its
`relation to cholesterol 70¢-hydroxylase activity.
`K.Einarsson, _]-E. Akerluncl, E. Reihnér, and
`I. Bjorkheni
`1591
`
`Peroxisomal I3-oxidation of branched chain fatty
`acids in human skin fibroblasts. H. Singh, M.
`Brogan, D. Johnson, and A. Poulos
`1597
`
`Intestinal lipids and lipoproteins in the human fetus:
`modulation by epidermal growth factor.
`E. Levy,
`L. Thibault, and D. Menard
`1607
`
`Effects of dietary fat on cholesterol movement be-
`tween tissues in CBA{] and C5 7BR..I'cd'J' mice.
`S. I.
`Kuan,
`Stewart. M. K. Dowd, L. Patterson,
`Dupont, and R. C. Scagravc
`1619
`
`Sulfonate analogues of chenodeoxycholic acid:
`metabolism of sodium 30:, 7or-dil'1yd1‘oxy-25-homo-
`5,8-cholane-25-sulfonate and sodium 3oc,7c¢-
`dihydroxy-24-nor-5,3-cholane-23-sulfonate in the
`hamster.
`5. Miki, E. H. Mosbach, B. I. Cohen, M.
`
`Yoshii, N. Ayyad, and C. K. McSherry
`
`1629
`
`Transgenic mice expressing human apolipoprotein
`A-I have sera. with modest trypanolytic activity in
`vitro but
`remain susceptible to infection by
`Trypanosoma brucei bmcei.
`5. Owen, M. P. T.
`Gillett, and T. E. Hughes
`1639
`
`Identification and properties of the proline,—,,«,,-leucine
`mutant LDL receptor in South Africans of Indian
`origin. D. C. Rubinsztein, G. S. Coetzee, A. D.
`Marais, E. Leitersdorf, H. C. Seftel, and D. R. van
`der Wcsthuyzen
`1647
`
`Bisphosphonates used for the treatment of bone
`disorders inhibit squalene synthase and cholesterol
`biosynthesis.
`D. Amin, S. A. Cornell, S. K.
`Gustafson, S.
`Need1e,_]. W. Ullrich, G. E. Bilder,
`and M. H. Pcrrone
`1657
`
`Evidence for a common biliary cholesterol and
`VLDL cholesterol precursor pool
`in rat
`liver.
`B. G. Stone and C. D. Evans
`1665
`
`Effects of apolipoprotein E, .5-very low density lipo-
`proteins, and cholesterol on the extension of
`neurites by rabbit dorsal root ganglion neurons in
`vitro. G. E. Handelmann,
`K. Boyles, K. H.
`Weisgraber, R. W. Mahley, and R. E. Pitas
`1677
`
`Metabolism of high density lipopmtein lipids by the
`rat liver: evidence for participation of hepatic
`lipase in the uptake of cholesteryl ester. H.
`Kadowaki, G. M. Patton, and‘ S.
`Robins
`1689
`
`Effiux of lipid from Fibroblasts to apolipoproteins:
`dependence on elevated levels of cellular un-
`estei-ified cholesterol.
`J. K. Bielicki, W. _]._]ohnson,
`R. B. Weinberg, M. Glick, and G. H. Rothblat
`1699
`
`PAPERS ON METHODOLOGY
`
`High sensitivity negative ion GC—MS method for
`detection of desaturated and chain-elongated prod-
`ucts of deuterated linoleic and linolenic acids.
`
`R.
`1711
`
`Pawlosky, H. W. Sprccher, and N. Salem. Jr.
`
`An in vitro model for essential fatty acid deficiency:
`HepG2 cells permanently maintained in lipid-fnee
`medium.
`E. E. Furth, H. Sprecher, E. A. Fisher,
`H. D. Fleishman, and M. Laposata
`1719
`
`Author Index
`
`1727
`
`Announce ment
`
`172 7
`
`International Conference on HDL-Cholesterol and
`
`Triglycerides
`
`1723
`
`Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids!Eicosanoids and Anti
`oxidants in Biology and Human Diseases
`1728
`
`1st International Congress of the International
`Society for the Study of Fatty Acids and Lipids
`1728
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 3/19
`
`

`
`JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
`
`\r’n|um:': 33 Nunlber ll
`
`Not-'embL-r I993
`
`AMPLIFIED TI'I"L|:".S
`
`Tltis it}! it desfgmd to aid the reader in warming the :'.tstte_for topt'r:'
`qf :'m‘em'!.
`TE: each title are added r’ceg'
`tttarris t'm2’:ltatt'ng topics deal’!
`will:
`in the paper but not sperffirafly raferrcd to in Mt” rifle‘.
`
`'ll-II-I DISCOVERY ASE! DI-;\'[-:I£ir'ME.'|-'T or H.’\/IG-CQA REDIJCTASE INHIBITORS. S1-"ECI/\]'_ AR‘['lt':l.[-'..
`HMG—CoA rerluctase
`'
`clmlcstcml
`-
`I.l')I.—t‘holesttt:rol
`-
`atherosclerosis
`
`A Etta?!
`
`FAMILIAL. APOl.lPl'Jl'-'kCrrI-iI.\'- E DEFICIENCY AND TYPE. Ill HYPERLll'-'tJPRCII'I-;I:‘€IiM|«\ DUE To A
`PRt'.:\m'rI.;RE Smv Clcmcm IN THE APDLIPIJPRUTEIN E Gt-zm-;
`
`atherosclerosis
`olism
`
`- dysbetalipnproteinentia
`
`lipnprolein metab-
`- nonsense mutation -
`1'? Lame, H. B. Hrdtvrf III, M, S. A-i'rr:g_.
`J’. S/rar!a.t‘u.r,
`C. 1.aRw'a, H. B. Bmwrr. fr.
`
`S.
`
`l2t}:-l‘lYDROX\’I_A$i-; ACTIVITY IN HI.=.\im~: LIVER A.\5[!|
`Hvokoxvmsa Activity
`
`ITs RELATION ‘I0 Ct-ior.Es.1't3RtJt_ 7:1-
`
`tcliolcstyramint:
`
`- gallstone disease
`
`intestinal resection
`-
`K. Et'rmr.r.m::, “I-5. Aalwr/ttrid, E. Reialtnéfi
`
`I. B;I't5r/(Item
`
`PI-L|{(JX1SOMAL .8—OxtL:.a.T1on: m-' BRANCI-IE!) CHAIN FM"n' Acms IN Humtm SKIN ]'”|tsRoBL.As'rs
`adrenolcukudystrophy - Zellwegcr syndrome
`-
`rhizome.-lie chondrodysplastia punc-
`tata
`-
`rnit0chon(.l1‘l.'1
`'
`per(Jxisr.mIt.‘.s
`H.
`.S'fn_._gI1, A-I. Brogan, £1 Jofinson. A. H-Jz.tt’n.s
`
`II~"r|3s'1'Ii\‘_Ai_ I.|I=tns AND LIPQPROTEINS IN HIE Hl.'M.-‘\N FE'rL.'s: Mont-=L..-\T[o:\' BY EPIDERMAL
`GROWTH F_atc'rtJR
`
`jejunal trxplants in culture
`
`-
`
`lipid estt:t'ificatiun
`
`-
`
`Iipuprmein secretion
`E. Lug-_. L. Tfttbauft. D .-lrfértard
`
`{'J.N' CHOLESTER('JI_ NlIIJ\.-'l:'..\!ENT BPZTWEEN T'IssL‘-es
`
`1.\: CBA{] AND
`
`F.r\"['
`
`Er-‘I-‘F.(:TS or l)IETAR\’
`CWBR/"calf MICE
`-
`cholesterol synthesis
`3.
`I. Kztwi,
`
`- pulyunsattiratccl fat
`saturated fat
`.S'£.«rmur£, M‘. K. Dowri, L. Pr2tt'm'rm_. ‘ Duprmt, R. C. Skagmur
`
`lViETAfl0l.lSM or S01:-|1.'M 3ot,7or—
`SLILI-'0i\iA'1'1-1 Al\'.A|.DC.i-LIES OF CHI-1|\'ODEOXYC|IOI.IC Acm:
`DII1Yi)R1.’)XY-25-HOMO-53-(‘:1IOLANE-25-SULFON.-‘\'['E AND Son1L‘_\1 Soc,Tat-Dlrtvnaoxv-24-reoR—5.8—
`c:Iaot_.atNe-23—sULF0N.\TE IN "rm-; HAMSTER
`
`-
`intestinal absorption - organic synthesis
`-
`- biliary Fistula
`Me:>5uc"rr'ce.'ttt-aurrtfus
`bacterial 7-dchydrtnxylzition

`l)iI.‘itransforma|'.I0rI
`S.
`It-ftifi, E. H. fiforbarlt,
`B.
`I. Coiim,
`lfia-left", N Ayyari, C. K.
`i‘vf.»:.S‘.r‘iergv
`
`.-‘vi.
`
`I629
`
`.=\—I Haw-1 SERA WITH l.VlOL‘iES'l'
`l‘lL-'-.\IA.\1 Ai=oLtPoPRUn'.Is:
`'l'RA.'~:sc.'I3NIc NIICF. Ext-Iu:ssI.\'t:
`TRYPANOL&"I'lC AC'I'I\’I'I'Y IN VITRO BUT Rem.-u.\t SL-'SCE|-"l'IBI.I~'. T0 Im=E.c1‘Im: av TR't'PAl'l-'0S0.\f.-\
`flR|'J(?EI BRUCE!
`
`higlt density lipnprotein '
`
`trypannlysis
`
`J S. Owen, M.
`
`I’. 7.’ GM.-:t‘!, T E. Hughflj
`
`'fiT="’“"
`n..... .;.II
`I_'_-.
`University
`
`"
`*
`J
`..:I
`V'v"i::.consin
`
`NOV 1 2 1392
`
`1305 Linden Driire
`i Mac-itsson, W:
`.-".:‘.'.-'{‘.=
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 4/19
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 4/19
`
`

`
`lDI3N'1‘IFlC.-\TIl'JN AND PROPII-‘.R'l‘lES or TIIE PROLINE554-l.EL|G]NE MLI'rAr~t'r LDL RECEPTOR IN
`Sourtt A1=RI(:.atNs or lM3t,\:u ORIGIN
`
`lltmilial
`Sclerusis
`
`corunary l1(.'F1l'l
`llypvrtiholesternlcmia °
`'-
`low clensity lipnproluitt t'::cepIr)I'
`A D.
`/1-Inmrlt. E. L.°.!'f£J'_rrfu:f H. C.
`
`athero-
`''
`chtaluslerol

`cliscase
`D. C. Rnbr'r1.rehrin.
`(3. fl. C0£‘:'If.’E.
`Sag‘/?r.'.l', 11 R. van tier‘
`l'l-';3z5tft:{}'zc':t
`
`lEI4?
`
`l5lSP|IOSl‘H(>NA']'ES USED FOR THF TREATM!-INT or BONE DISIJRLII-_'RS INHIBIT SQL'AI.E.'~.'E SYN'I'H.=tst-;
`A-ND Cll-IOLI-'.$'I‘l-ZROL BIOSYNTHESIS
`
`‘I'M U5 - parnidmnattt:
`cells
`
`'
`
`- _]??-l-
`elntlrunate
`etidrnnatc -
`-
`alenrlennute
`.'V('t?£Ht?
`.4. Cunmfil. S, K. Cmmfsori. 3.
`D. Aritftr, S.
`_ l-‘In’ L-Wri(:‘l. C. E. Bildfl,
`:11. H. Pérmnc
`
`165?
`
`I-1\-IDENCE mu A COMMON BlI.].I!\R\'CHL}J_1~;S'I'EROL AND VLDL CIIGLESTERUI. FRECURSOR Pom.
`IN RAT LIVER
`
`acyl coertzyme Azehctlcsteml
`synthesis
`-
`T at-hyclruxylase
`-
`
`:1cyltrm1sfet‘asr:.
`Iipnpmteins
`
`bile acid
`-- HMG~CnA rct'luctase-
`B. G.
`.‘s‘tam'. C. D. Ema:
`
`1665
`
`EFFECT5 at-' APOL]I'O|'l{t'_‘l'TF.IN 13., I3-VERY Low Dt:Nst‘t'v LIPOPROTEINS, mun C:noLEs'rt~:ItoI. mt 'l'HE
`EXTENSION ut-' NEL'R|Tt=_s BY RABBIT Doasu. R001‘ GANULION NI-‘.URON:-5 IN VITRG
`

`
`apolipopmtein F.
`cltolesterol
`
`-
`
`clorsal root ganglia
`
`- nerve regeneration -
`
`lipuprnteins
`
`C. E Hanni-frnntrrt. _ K. Bqylcr. K. H.
`
`I'I'i'i5grab.4.'r, R. H.’ A-iaitlflli R. E.
`
`P1-(EU
`
`167?
`
`l\v'lE'.'l'AH(){.IS.\-1 or HIGH DENSITY LtPoPRo'rI<;I:s‘ LII-'1D.‘§ BY THE RAT LIVER: EVl1'lEN(.'|-2 FOR
`PARTICIP.-‘\'I'ION or HEPATIC LIFASE.
`IN Tl-IE Uxrram; :3:-‘ CIICILESTERYL lisrt-;k
`HDI.
`-
`liver perfusion -
`triglyrt-1'Idcs
`'
`phospltolipids
`H Kadnzttakf. 0'. M'. Patron, 3.
`
`Ratlzina
`
`I589
`
`EFFLl.‘)i or LIPID mom l-”tuR013L.v\s'rs T0 AI‘()LlPCIF'ROTE.lNS: DEPENDENCE ON EI.F.\a‘A'I'ED LF,\-'I".I.S
`or CEt.LLIL.attt UNESTER1}-‘II-LL) CHDLES'I'ERl’)I.
`
`- plmsphnlipid ctflux
`apnlipopmtcin A-I
`fibroblasts
`-
`revc-|'sc cholesterol transport
`
`-
`
`chulesterol-e|]ric'.hed
`Cl'JlIlll:SlC!‘Ol elllux -
`J’. K. Bt'e{t'nl'i, I-if Jalzmrm.
`l'l'2':'n!mg. j. M’. Gt':'r!r__. G. H. Rambler
`
`R. B.
`
`1699
`
`HIGH SENSITIVITY NF.IZ‘.A‘l'l\'E ION CC.-MS MET:-ton FOR DETECTION OF DES.-‘\TUR.ATED Arm
`CHAIN-ELUNI3.-\'r1~:1J Pnumacrs m'~' DEl.'TERA1‘ED L1.\'0LF.u.:
`.-mu LINCILENIC Atztns
`
`pentafiuorobcnzyl esters
`NCI
`- dcsaturation
`
`- deutcratcti
`
`- GC-MS
`linoleir and linolenir acids
`R. J. Pawiarigy. H.
`I-'1-1’ Sprecfm, N .S‘at’mt, Jr.
`
`ITII
`
`AN IN VITRO MODEL I-‘CIR ESSEN'I'lAl_ F.\'r'n' ACID DF.F1(2lENC\‘I
`MAINTAINED IN LIPID-FREE l\’lEu1t..'.\t
`
`l-{EPG2 CEI..1.S PF.RM:\|\'I-1|\'TI.‘h'
`
`L"SSL'Il[ial Ihtty acids
`
`'
`
`arachidonatc
`
`E, E. Furtlt. H. Sprrctmr,
`- Mead acid
`E. A. Ft‘-jlllff, H. D. Flrfsfinran, AI. Lttpwanla
`
`ITIQ
`
`
`
`COVER: Effect of ,8—VLDL_. chulesterol, and apoE on ncurite outgrowth from
`dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitm. The ,8-VLDL (upper left) and cholesterol
`(upper right) promote neurite extension and branching. Addition of apcIE together
`
`with I3-VLDL (lower left) or cholesterol (lower right) reduces neurite branching but
`
`promotes extension away from the cell body. (See Handelmann et al., p. 16??)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PR2C_l15-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 5/19
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 5/19
`
`

`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`special article
`
`The discovery and development of HMG-CoA
`red uctase inhibitors
`
`Akira Endo
`
`D::partt'nL'1'l[ o|' Applietl Biological Science, Tokyo No}-to University. Fuchu.
`
`'liJkyo_.
`
`lflfi japan
`
`lI\lTRODUCTlON
`
`E.‘({L'lt‘~l\-'11‘. epidemiolngic studies performed in many
`[~Qu[][1'1'.§ have shown that
`increased blood cholesterol
`
`[41314-
`increased levels oi’
`levels. or. more specifically,
`cholesi ml. are causally related to an increased risk of
`coronnnv lteart diseztse. Coronary risks rises prt)g1'essi\-‘cly
`with an increase in the cholesterol level. particularly when
`cholesrrnrol levels rise above 200 mg/dl (1, 2). There is also
`substantial evirknrc that
`lowering total and LDL—
`cholesterol
`levels will reduce the incidence oi" coronary
`heart e'i.~;ee1se (2).
`to search for tnicrnbial
`In 19?} we started a project
`metabolites that would inhibit HMG-CoA recluetase, the
`rate—li-niting enzyme in the syntliesis of cholesterol. We
`hoped that the suppression ofde novo cholesterol synthe-
`sis in the bocly by inhibiting HMG-CoA I‘t’.(lL1C[£1.'-EB would
`reduce plasma cholesterol levels in humans. These studies
`led to the discovery of a potent reductasc inhibitor, named
`meva.s|;tt.ii1 (_forn1erly called ML—236B or compactin) (3).
`Subsequently. we elucidated the biochemical mechanisms
`of action ofincvastatiti {_4, 3} and by 1980, had shown that
`[]1t3'\."rlE~I_tilil‘1 marl-zedly lowers the levels of LDL-cholesterol
`in both experiment:-.tl animals and humans (6-8). These
`findiiigs
`stimulated the world-wide development of
`nieva.-:..;itin analogues in the 19805: and. by 1990,
`three
`E'I'LIg~—Iovastatin (l‘orn'ierly called mevinolin), simvasta-
`tin, and pravastatin -had been approved and marketed in
`man} -.'t'=unI'ries (9, 10). These drugs have been well estab-
`lislied as eHi':ctive and sale t'.l10l(:SIt3]‘CIl-lOWc‘1'ln_t_; drugs and
`are used by many patients. Benelicittl eilccts from their
`admit,-istration in patients with coronary heart disease are
`being observcrl (ll).
`
`3|-lppienicnlary key words
`‘3h‘-'lI‘HIn-no]
`- aIhcrosc.lc:-usis
`
`Hi\r[{i-i;Zoi"\ t't.’tlIIt’_‘IiL'a't:
`
`- cholesterol
`
`0
`
`l.I_ll.-
`
`cluding nicotinie acid (12), cholestyramine (I3), clofibrate
`(CPIB) (14). neomycin {.15}, plant sterols (16), triparanol
`[ME-R-'29)
`(IF),
`lJ~tl'1yroxine {I8}. and estrogenic hor-
`mones (19). Of these drugs. nicotinic acid reduces both
`cholesterol and triglyceride (especially the latter) in hu-
`mans. These efli:cts are due to ."-1 decrease in lipoprotcin
`synthesis, resulting in a fall in LDL-cholesterol. The most
`prominent side El'ii'_‘ClIOlIl1iCL3[lI1lC acid is cutaneous vasodi-
`lation. Other adverse eliiects include rash, gastrointestinal
`upset, hyperttricemia, hyperglycemia. and hepatic dys-
`function (20).
`Clholestyramine, an anion—exchange resin, acts by bind-
`ing bile acids within the intestinal lumen, thus interfering
`with their reabsorption and enhancing their fecal e.~:cre-
`tion. As a result, bile acid synthesis is markedly stimu-
`lated. This
`leads
`to an increased requirement
`for
`cholesterol
`in the liver. which causes an elevation of
`
`hepatic HMG-CoA reductasc activity. Cholestyratmine is
`highly ell‘t-.ctive in the treatment of many patients with
`high cholesterol levels, but unfortunately,
`it is not toler-
`ated by all patients. The1'efore, in spite of its proven use-
`fulness.
`the bile acid scqucstrant
`is not
`an ideal
`cholcsterol—lowering agent.
`Clofibrate and its derivatives are the hypolipidemic
`agents most commonly used worldwide. Its major eilcct in
`hyperlipoprotcinemia is to reduce VLDL-cholesterol; in
`most patients the cholesterol-lowering effect is minimal to
`moderate. Clolibrate has several pharmacological actions,
`including stimulation ol’ lipolysis by increasing adipose
`tissue-derived lipoprotein lipase. However, details of its
`actions at the biochemical level are not well understood.
`
`Neomycin is an eilective cholcste1‘ol—lowering agent in
`patients with FH.
`It acts by precipitating cholesterol wi-
`thin the intestinal tract and thus inhibiting its absorption.
`Side elli;'(:ts.
`including nausea and diarrhea.
`limit long-
`tcrm ariininistration.
`
`I-[ISTORICAL BAG KG ROUND
`
`Duting the 19505 and l960s. many cholesterol-lowering
`agent. were reported and introclueed into clinical use. in-
`
`_'\bbrt'\'it|tions: HMi'i, 3-Iiydroxy—3-niethylglutnryl; ‘v'LDI_. very low
`den.-siI_\'
`lipoprotein:
`I.Dl_, hm rlcrisily lipuprotein;
`l[JI.,
`ll'l[t"['lI}l.'L‘ll&li(‘
`llr‘iI.\?ll\_:' lipnprotein'. H[)l.. lligli rlcnrsitv lip:-p:'ot::iri: FH. 1'-alnilial |1ypc:‘-
`('l1I']ll'5It'l‘lIll.‘I'lllI!.
`
`journal of Lipid Research Volurnc 33.
`
`l.‘)9J1
`
`1569
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 6/19
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 6/19
`
`

`
`Plant stcrc-ls, which interfere with the absorption of
`cholesterol
`in the intestinal
`tract, have no effect on
`VLDL-cholesterol, and their effect on l_.Dl_.—eliolesterol is
`
`variable. The long-term eilects ol‘ plant
`unknown.
`
`sterols are
`
`is effective in reducing serum cholesterol.
`Triparanol
`This drug inhibits cholesterol synthesis in the final
`stage(s) in the synthetic pathway, resulting in the accumu-
`lation of other sterols. Because of‘ side cflccts including
`cataracts,
`it was withdrawn from the market early in the
`19603 (21).
`isomer of I.-thyroxine, elTec—
`the optical
`D-Tliyroxine,
`tively lowers LDL-cholesterol
`in both euthyroid and
`hypothyroid patients. The use of D-thyroxinc in a long-
`term trial (Coronary Drug Project) in men with estab-
`lished ischemic heart disease was discontinued because of
`
`increased mortality in patients with arrhythrnias, angina
`pectoris, or multiple infarctions (20).
`Estrogens have been used to treat hyperlipidemia.
`However,
`escrogens are unsuitable as hypolipidemic
`agents in men because of their feminizing ellects and be
`cause they elevate VLDL and triglycerides (20).
`Thus, none of the drugs available by the early 1970s
`could be considered ideal cholesterol-lowering agents.
`However, experience with many drugs suggested that
`drug-induced lowering of plasma cholesterol would be
`effective in the treatment of coronary athcrogenesis and
`heart disease (1, 2).
`In the 19605, cholesterol metabolism in experimental
`animals and human subjects was extensively studied by
`many groups. Cholesterol can be derived either from the
`intestinal absorption of dietary cholesterol or from syn-
`thesis de novo within the body (22, 23). Experiments in
`several animal species showed that when cholesterol is re-
`moved from the diet,
`the liver increases its capacity to
`synthesize cholesterol and that this organ, together with
`the intestine, is able to synthesize sufficient cholesterol to
`meet the needs of all the other cells in the body. Although
`virtually all other tissues also possess the capacity to syn~
`thesize cholesterol,
`their synthetic rates.
`in contrast
`to
`those of liver and intestine. remain low during dietary
`cholesterol deprivation, so that under these circumstances
`the liver and intestine account for 32 and 11%. respec-
`tively. of all detectable sterol synthetic activity found in
`the monkey ('23). On the other hand, when cholesterol is
`added to the diet, cholesterol synthesis is nearly com-
`pletely suppressed in liver; it is partially suppressed in in-
`testine; and it remains low in other body tissues (24, 25).
`Feedback suppression of cholesterol synthesis in the liver
`by dietary cholesterol is mediated through changes in the
`activity of HMG-CoA reductase, a microsomal enzyme
`that catalyzes the conversion of HMG—CoA to mevalonate
`(23, 26).
`In addition, rcductase activity in the liver is
`regulated by many other physiological conditions. Under
`these conditions. changes in reductase activity are closely
`
`1570
`
`journal of Lipid Research
`
`Volumt.-. 33, 199'.’
`
`related to changes in the overall rate of cholesterol synthe-
`sis ('.?.3}. The control mechanism for cholesterol
`nthcsis
`is partially or completely lost when liver cells become
`malignant (23). These findings obtained by lit‘.-'1') sup_
`ported the concept
`that
`the inhibition of I-lT\'lG-CDA
`reductase would be an effective means of lowering plasma
`cholesterol in humans.
`
`DISCOVERY OF MEVASTATIN
`
`I began in 19?], with Dr. Masao Kuroda, to search for
`
`HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors of microbial origin. We
`hoped that certain microorganisms would prorluce such
`compounds as a weapon in the light against other mi-
`crobes that
`required sterols or other
`lS0[_}I\"t'I0ldS for
`growth. Inhibition of}-lMG—CoA reductase would thus be
`lethal to these microbes.
`
`At that time. HMG-CoA reductase was as-_:;::-«ed pi-in.
`cipally by measuring the incorporation of radioactivity
`from ["‘C]HMG—CoA into mevalonate
`('27).
`A5-
`[”C]HMG-CDA was too expensive to use for rl-.'I.r.-rrnining
`the inhibitory activity of thousands of samples, we finit
`searched for microbial culture broths that inhibited d'lE
`
`incorporation oi‘ | "‘C|acetate into nonsaponiliable lipids.
`The active broths were then tested for their ability to in-
`hibit lipid synthesis from [31-Ilrnevalonate. Culture broth!
`that were active in the first assay but not active in the so
`cond determination were suspected to Qontain a com-
`pound (or compounds} that inhibited the c'aIl_\-' stages be-
`tween acetate and mevalonate in the cholesterol synthetic
`pathway. The principal active componentts) from these"
`culture broths were isolated. Rat liver €I12_\_'t"tI:":- were used
`
`for these assays (28).
`Over a 2-year period, approximately l'i,Ul.lU microbial
`strains were tested for their ability to block ll i.-id syntl’1C5l5-
`As a result, the antibiotic citrinin was first isolated as an
`active compound from the mold il-'f'}rttt:'um uttimnm (29l'
`Citrinin was shown to irreversibly inhi't'-i' HMG'G_°l'_\
`rcductase (30). Subsequently. a strain of H':tt'ri’Ht'um 511"’
`mm: was found to produce active CDm[}(1UF'|l.ll_5l- T0 55°13":
`the active component(s), 600 l of culture filtrate was 133‘
`tracted with organic solvents and applied to silica gel
`chromatography, followed by crystallization givmg Cr-35'
`tals (23 n1g)ofmevastatin (formerly called l\-'IL-235B_]. 3)‘
`the end of 1973,
`the structure of rncvastatin was clcfclg
`mined by a combination of spectroscopi-.:
`I licmtcal. 3-“
`X—ray crystallographic methods (Fig. 1'} t".i'}.
`em;-3 sub-
`Mevastatin has a hexahydronaphthalenc skfll
`which can '3‘
`stzituted with a ;3—hydroxy-5-lactone moiet M
`trcatmcfll
`converted into the water-soluble open at-id I3)’
`;.,t3\.'£lSIa1.lI1 was
`with alkali
`(Fig. 2)
`(-1-).
`lnteJ‘estiIi_£_§l_i-3
`I t-t(:j]aCet3ll~"
`shown to inhibit sterol syntheses from limit
`flung. bill
`and ["lC]HMG—CoA at nanomolar r.'='=I1"*‘“”a
`eintfl
`showed no effect on the conversion of ['"'l l
`I "““'al°nm
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PFl2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 7/19
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 7/19
`
`

`
`petitive with NADPH in the reaction of HMG-CoA
`reductase (33). Kinetic analysis suggr:s1'cr.i
`that HMO-
`CDA first binds to the enzyme, lollowed by the binding of
`NADPH_ Reduction then occurs, with release of NADP.
`
`CoA, and mevalonate from the enzyme. These results
`suggested that
`the lactonc portion of the mevastatin
`molecule is the active center and binds to the HMG bind-
`
`ing site of the reductasc molecule. The structural similar-
`ity between the lactone and HMG portions supports this
`conclusion. Later,
`it was shown that the tight binding of
`mevastatin is the result of its simultaneous interaction
`
`with the I-INIG binding domain ofthe enzyme and the ad-
`jacent hydrophobic pocket. This region is itself not uti-
`lized in substrate binding {34-).
`The structural
`similarity between mevastatin and
`HMG—CoA and the observed competition by these two
`molecules helped to clarify preliminary structurc—activity
`relationships in the inhibition of HMG~CoA reductase.
`The rnevastatin molecule is composed of {our moieties
`(Fig. 2]: :1) the B-hydroxy~§—lactonc (or the 3,5-dihydroxy—
`heptanoie acid portion}, 2:) the moiety bridging the lactone
`and the lipophilic groups,
`c_)
`the hexahydronaphthalene
`nucleus, and rt’)
`the side chain ester. Our preliminary
`study of the structure—activity relationships suggested a
`crucial role for the 3- and 5—hydroxy groups in HMS-
`CoA rcductase inhibition, as activity is abolished by the
`conversion of either of these hydroxyl groups into the
`methyl ester. Replacement of’ the carboxyl group of the
`acid form with carboxamide also ablatcs activity ('32).
`Furthermore, the distance between the lactone and deca-
`
`lin ring influences the inhibitory activity which suggests
`that a certain spatial relationship needs to be maintained
`between the reactive site (lactone) and the putative bind-
`ing site (decalin ring) (32, 35). Another functionally es-
`sential region of mevastatin is its hexahydronaphthalcne
`ring. This is shown by evidence that HMG, which lacks
`a hexahydronaphthalene ring,
`is more than l(l5-fold less
`
`HMG—CoA
`
`Mevastatin (acid fonn)
`
`Fig. 2. HMG—(loA -.1nt'l the acid forrn oli mI:\'.'istatin.
`
`R:H
`
`Mevastatin
`
`{Compactin. ML-236B}
`
`R=CH3 Lovastatin
`(Mevinofin, Monacolin K)
`
`Fig. 1.
`
`Mevastatin and lovaslatin_
`
`5[C]'ols_ The results demonstrated rnevastatin to be a po-
`tent
`inhibitor of I-IMG-CoA reductasc. The same com-
`
`pound {designated compactin} was also isolated as an an-
`tibiotic from Pemrt'£t'z'tm1 brtmirampactuin by Brown et al.
`in
`
`two less active com—
`l9i'o tiil). Along with rnevastatin,
`poun-‘as closely related to tnevastatin were also isolated
`from Pm. rz'!rt'mtm (3. 32}. Subsequently. the search for ad-
`ditional HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors was continued
`
`for ;:mother 10 years, leading to the isolation of several
`compounds of the rnevastatin family (32).
`
`llNHIBITIOt\l OF I-IMG—CoA REDUCTASE. BY
`MEVAS'D’{'l"IN
`
`Tin: water~soluble, open-ring acid of mevastatin (Fig.
`2) g.-..ve more potent and reliable inhibition than the lac-
`tone lorm in the assay of both .sterr_il synthesis from radi-
`ulabt-led substrates and HMG-CoA reductase (4). The in-
`hibition of HMG-CoA rcductasc by mevastatin was
`reversible and competitive with respect
`to HMG-CoA.
`The J’\‘_.- value for the acid form was ~l x 101‘ M (Fig. 3},
`Wl'lllr* under the same conditions, the K”. for HNIG--Ct1A
`was = lfl'5‘ M
`Thus, the aflinity of HMG—C‘.oA reduc-
`tase "or compactin is l{l,0l'}U~liolcl higher than its afiinity
`for the natural substrate I-[MG-CoA, showing nievastatin
`to bl." a highly potent inhibitor. The mechanism by which
`the‘. :statin inhibits rcductase appeared to be ideal For its
`development as :1 drug.
`A. that time, adenosine-2'-munophospho-.5‘-diphosphcr
`Vibe’-c., a synthetic NADP analogue, was found to be com-
`
`Endn HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors
`
`1571
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 8/19
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 8/19
`
`

`
`1:‘V.(nmoles!mint'mg)_l
`
`-60--10 -20 O
`
`20 40 EU
`
`-20
`
`0
`
`20 40
`
`50
`
`1fD.L-HMG-CDA. mm“
`
`1rNADPH,mM"
`
`Fig. 3. Double-rt-.ripI'oca| plots o1‘Iheinl1il)ition of Hl\-1C;-CoA reduc-
`tase by ntevastatiti, Hl\-'[C-CnA I't‘l'lL:I('ljJ5I.‘. was solubilizt-.d from rat liver
`mierosomes and partially purified. Concentrations o1'HMC2'—C0A in (A)
`and NADPH in (B) were varied as indicated. final concentrations of
`rru.-vastatin were 0 (none). 11.6. 23.3. or 69.8 us: (4). {Used with per-
`Inissinn. Ff1‘B.i‘I.r.'t.t.
`1‘.-iTr'fi. 72: 3‘23—3‘2l).l
`
`active
`
`than mevastatin.
`
`On the other hand,
`
`the
`
`sliglttly
`C13-methyl—substituted analogue lovastzttin is
`rnore active than mevastatin (3. 36, 37), while hydroxyla-
`tion at C8 shows reduced activity (38). In addition, the ot-
`tnethylbutyrate ester plays a significant role, since aria-
`logues that lack this moiety {ML—23fiA and ML—236C)
`have one-tenth or less activity, as compared with mevasta-
`tin ('3).
`
`ln 1973. Brown, Dana, and Goldstein (39) I'L'_'.1;r_pr[ed
`that HMG-CoA reduetase ztetivity of cultured mam-
`nialiatn cells is suppressed by LDL, but not by HDL. Sub-
`sequently these investigators discovered a cell
`--urfat;e
`receptor for LDL and elucidated the mechanism bi." which
`this receptor mediates Feetlbaek control of Cbttlesterol syn-
`thesis and I-{MG-COA reduetase (40-42). Fatnilini hype,-_
`tzholesterolernia (FH), a genetic disorder in humans, was
`shown to be caused by inherited defects in the. LDL Tecgp-
`tor; these defects disrupt the normal control ol‘tl-- lesterol
`metabolism. These
`landmark studies of cholt:stet'ol
`metabolism strongly supported our studies in both ex.
`perirne.nta_l techniques and in the general idea ul'.levelop.
`ing I-IMG-COA reductztse inhibitors.
`By using the techniques developed by Goldsnz.-in and
`Brown, we demonstrated that
`tnevastatin strongly in-
`hibited sterol synthesis from [“C]aeetate in a. variety of
`cultured rnammalian cells,
`including L cells ....1d Cells
`
`from patients with homozygous FH. at ctincemmtions as
`low as l0'9 M (Fig. 4) (5. 32. +3). Inhibition ol l”C]acc—
`tate incorporation was 50% at 1 n,\.-1 (0.-'1 n;;_{fr-.2|:u in nor-
`mal human cells and cells from patients with FT-l’. in con-
`trast, LM cells, which grow in a lipid—l'ree.
`synthetic
`medium. were far tnore sensitive, with lI‘Il1ll.)lIl'>I: of sterol
`
`l"l‘lt'V:1S[a[lI1 concentrations of (1.! nM (44).
`synthesis at
`Stem} synthesis from [3H]inc\talonate and t}t:.:._\ acid syn-
`thesis From [“C]acetate in cultured cells wr It.‘ not
`in-
`hibited (5).
`s_t_'nthesis was
`At higher concentrations where sterol
`strongly reduced, tnevastatin inhibited cell grr wth as well.
`
`A. L cells
`
`8. Human fibroblasts
`
`T:
`
`I
`
`/1
`
`./°
`Fatty acids
`
`Fatty acids
`
`[ninja
`“OTC-TO
`
`1Do.'§‘:-—0""""'
`30
`
`O?D
`
`140
`
`120
`
`(%ofcontrol)
`
`
`
`
`
`Sterolandfattyacidsynthesisfrom["'C]acetate
`
`\ ' Sterols
`\
`
`0
`
`0.001
`
`0.01
`
`I11
`
`Ch‘.
`1.0
`10
`
`U
`
`0.001
`
`0.01
`
`D.1
`
`Mevastatin tugfml]
`Mevastatin (pgtmll
`and in Iil:-i'ol'il'rI.x'f-T
`Eflect ol' mevastatin on sterol and fatty acid synthesis lrom |”C]at'etate in L cells
`Fig. 4.
`from at normal subject and from an FH homozygote QB].
`L cells grown in letal calf Sl.T1.iI[1 lor 3 clays were in
`eubated with '["C];u:etate and varying concentrations of mevastatin. Alter inctlbatiun at 3?°CI for '2 l1, sterols and
`fatty acids were extracted and counted. (H) Human fibroblasts grown in fetal calf serum [or 5 clays wen: iI1t.'ulJ;:|-
`'
`with ["C}a<:etate and varying concentrations ol‘ mevastatin at 35°C} for 2 h and assayed liar stern! and Fatty elvitl
`synthesis (5). (Used with permission. Eur
`B:'ar}‘mn_
`IQTB. 37: 313-32].}
`
`1572
`
`Journal of Lipid Research Voltnnt: 33, 1992
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, lPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 9/19
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2122 - 9/19
`
`

`
`when __"Jll\'\'I1 in the presence of whole serum, growth 0!‘
`1
`,_.L._1]c
`RYE!!!’ completely inhibited by 1.3 ;.t..'\.’l
`(5 pig/ml)
`n-1{-\,';1SE'.ti1D. This inhibition was. however, overcotnc with
`results... nurrnal growth by the addition of a small
`amount of tnevalonatc, the product of I-ll)/IC}—C2oA reduc-
`msc I‘t'.at't'ion (Fig. 5)
`Suh:-...quently, studies by other investigators showed
`that
`jn
`cultured fil)roblast.s high
`concentrations of
`mevast.-itin block passage through the cell cycle (45-47)
`mg al
`--r cell morphology (4:8). Both effects could be
`prevent:--tl by the addition of mevalonate but not by the
`addition of cholesterol. which suggested that either
`mevalt -I are or one (or more) of its nonsterol products was
`involved. In 1984, Schmidt, Schneider. and Glomset (49)
`ineubznetl Swiss

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket