`1701“ ~ Ge-r‘:+:r;::S C::‘3?!42;.:?:'c‘»n 1
`:;-=.:<::s2;~,s
`
`estigational Drugs
`
`3:8;
`8Z>~
`t‘_’.U
`E0 -
`~=——
`ca
`
`Ezgm
`E255
`
`_§,//4%m§ LIBRARYOF
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 1/15
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 1/15
`
`
`
`February 2007 Vol. 16 No.2
`
`E)_<pert
`Opmion on lnvestigational Drugs
`
`Forthcoming articles
`- lnvelstigational agents against
`D|atinurri—resistant ovarian cancer
`- Emerging drug therapies for preventing
`. sporitarieous preterm labour and preterm birth
`lenew paradigm in the treatment of
`co orectal cancer: are we hitting the right
`target?
`
`.
`
`' Beyond heparin and warfarin: the new
`0
`_ ’
`'
`r
`_
`.
`‘
`generation of anticoagulants
`?:‘\;'E°'_C ‘Will Physiological mechanisms and
`Lations for treating diabetes and the
`_
`.
`.
`.
`metabolic Syndrome
`RY 720- 3 Sphlngolipid mimetic in
`tra'r:‘S‘g‘t°”l9dUl6lIqn: how a novel mechanism
`es into clinical benefit
`- Ma '
`‘
`.
`Canfgleprulatlon of the NGF network in prostate
`- lnvestigational a em
`Albsqelated Ka§lOSi'SSSfaC:I‘C(l.)rr::trTieTiI of
`0 Te|avancin' a novel
`‘
`-
`'
`l'F’09| co
`'
`G,am_p0SmVe mfediOmY Peptide for serious
`
`Perspective
`129 Discontinued drugs in 2005:
`endocrine and metabolic
`JR Co/ca
`
`Drug Evaluations
`Z25 AZD6140
`
`U5 Tantr;/,
`PA Gurbel
`
`/<P B//den &
`
`Reviews
`
`137
`
`lnvestigationaltreatments
`for postoperative surgical
`site infections
`6 Pou/akou & H G/amare//ou
`
`157 Recent progress on the
`topical therapy of
`onychomycosis
`/VIRKA//ey/, 51 Baker, KR Beutner
`& J P/attner
`
`169 Pharmacological therapy of
`atrial fibrillation
`/</< Patton & RL Page
`
`181 Treatment of opioid-induced
`gut dysfunction
`P Ho/zer
`
`195 Peroxisome proliferator—
`activated receptor—y ligands
`as bone turnover modulators
`
`C G/aginis,
`A Tsant//i—Kakou//dou &
`S Theocharis
`
`231 Liraglutide: a once—dai|y
`GLP—1 analogue for the
`treatment of Type 2 diabetes
`mellitus
`TV//sbo//
`
`239 Vandetanib(ZD6474):
`an orally available receptor
`tyrosine kinase inhibitor that
`selectively targets pathways
`critical for tumor growth and
`angiogenesis
`R5 Herbst, JV Heymach,
`MS O‘Re///i/, A Orin &
`AJ Ryan
`
`Key Paper Evaluation
`251 Natural product promotes
`repair of injured spinal cord
`M Braddock
`
`Meeting Highlights
`257 Advances in
`
`Anti—|nf|ammatory
`Therapeutics
`ll/I Braddock
`
`209 Use of botulinum toxins in
`cancer therapy
`R Ans/‘aux & B Ga//ez
`
`Appendices
`263 Glossary
`265 Acknowledgements
`
`
`F?
`
`219 A review of the current
`clinical trials for
`
`gastroenteropancreatic
`neuroendocrine tumours
`
`JR Strosberg & L/< Kvols
`
`informa
`healthcare
`
`2007 © lnlorma UK Ltd ISSN l354-3784
`
`T-his mateiri al was copiedi
`at tlh-E MLM andl irnay lbe
`5lJlbjECt US Copyright Laws
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 2/15
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 2/15
`
`
`
`Editorial Office
`Informa Healthcare, Telephone House,
`69-77 Paul Street, London, EC2A 4l,Q, UK.
`
`Tel: +44 (0)20 7017 7650
`Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 7667
`E—mail: eoid@informa.com
`Web: www.expertopin.com
`
`Commissioning Editor: Jessica Knights
`Production Editor: Surnayya Patel
`Drug Evaluations Editor: Monica Williams
`Publisher: Phil Garner
`
`Senior Advisory Panel
`Chairman: Fitzgerald JD: Materia Medica, UK
`Abou—Gharbia M: Wyeth-Ayerst, USA
`Baldwin JJ: Pharmacopeia, USA
`Buckel P: Boeliringer Mannheim, Germany
`Duncan WAM: RW Johnson, USA
`Evans C; Chiroscience, UK
`Gillis S: Corixa, USA
`Harrap K: Inst. Cancer Research, UK
`Hoyer D: Novartis, Switzerland
`Humphrey PPA: GlaxoSmithKline, UK
`Krogsgaard Thomsen M: Novo, Denmark
`Moncada S: The Cruciform Project, UK
`Morich F-J: Bayer, Germany
`Okazaki H: Takeda, Japan
`Paioni R: Novartis, Switzerlarid
`Poste 6: Health Technology Networks, USA
`Ringrose PS: Bristol—Myers Squibb, USA
`Boss BC: GlaxoSmithK|ine, UK
`Setoyama O: Chugai, Japan
`Sugino Y: Takeda, Japan
`Timmermanns P: DuPont, USA
`Weston A: Univ. Manchester, UK
`
`Section Editorial Board
`
`Pulmonary-Allergy, Dermatological,
`Gastrointestinal & Arthritis
`Bacon K, Farthing MJ, Foster M, Norris A,
`Richards IM, Roomans GM, Snell NJ, Taylor PC,
`Warne P
`Anti-infectives
`Blondeau J, Bryskier A, Bucklieit R, Chopra 1,
`Clerici M, Georgopapadakou N, Neamati N,
`Ryder N,
`l'uril< M
`Endocrine & Metabolic
`Brandi ML, Colca J, Dujovne C,
`Fuller P, Kowluru R, McCormack J, Proietto J,
`Whitfield J
`
`Central & Peripheral Nervous Systems
`Gurwitz D, Hill R6, Kloog Y, Palacios JM.
`Panetta JA, Schachter S, Tamminga C, Tariot P,
`Wood M
`
`Cardiovascular & Renal
`Barton M, Danser AHJ, Herbert J—M,
`Holvoet P, Ruflolo RR, von l-laehling S,
`Winkelmann BR
`Oncologic
`Denny WA, Kelland L, Koutsilieris M,
`Papavassiliou AG, Sawyer TK, Udayan D,
`Williams R, Zhang W
`
`_
`E)_(p_ert
`Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs
`
`Aims and scope
`
`Expert Opinion on lnvestigarional Drugs is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, evaluating
`developments in pharmaceutical research, from animal studies through to the launch of a new
`medicine. The journal is divided into six therapeutic areas:
`
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`-
`
`Pulmonary-Allergy, Dermatological, Gastrointestinal & Arthritis
`Anti-Infectives
`Endocrine 8r Metabolic
`
`Central 84 Peripheral Nervous Systems
`Cardiovascular & Renal
`
`- Oncologic
`
`Each section is reviewed regularly, allowing comprehensive coverage of the most important
`topics. Authors are encouraged to express their Expert Opinion of the status of the research
`under review, rather than to simply review the available data.
`
`Editorial policy
`Articles published in Expert Opinion on /ni/est/gationa/ Drugs are commissioned by the Editor in
`collaboration with the Section Editorial Board. Authors who wish to contribute should contact
`the Editor. All reviews and drug evaluations are subject to peer—review.
`
`Editorial boards
`
`The Senior Advisory Panel and Section Editorial Board are composed of Senior Scientists
`involved in drug research and development. The Senior Advisory Panel is responsible for the
`development of the journal, while the Section Editors are responsible for selecting authors and
`topics for review to ensure comprehensive coverage of subjects in each therapeutic area,
`Sources
`
`Permission has been kindly granted by the publisher of the following information source for
`Informa UK Ltd to provide its authors with relevant source material for use solely in the
`preparation of their reviews for Expert Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs;
`Investigational Drugs database (© Current Drugs Ltd.)
`
`Citations
`
`Expert Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs is indexed by:
`Chemical Abstracts
`Current Contents”/Life Sciences
`EMBASE/Excerpta Medica
`ISI Alerting Services
`Index Medicus/Medline
`Science Citations lndex—Expanded
`
`Copyright and disclaimer
`
`Conditions of sale - Expert Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs may be circulated only to those
`members of staff who are employed at the site at which the subscription is taken out, Readers
`are reminded that, under internationally agreed copyright legislation, photocopying of
`copyright materials is prohibited other than on a limited basis for personal use, This means that
`making copies of any article published in Expert Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs is ,3 breach of
`the law and can be prosecuted.
`
`Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and advisory board to ensure that no inaccurate or
`misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that
`the data and opinions appearing herein are the responsibility of the contributor concemed
`Accordingly, the publishers, advisory board, editors and their respective employees, officers and
`agents accept no liability whatsoever for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading
`data, opinions or statements. Approved product information should always be reviewed prior
`to prescribing.
`
`For reprint enquiries, please contact Ben Fisher (ben.fisher@informa.com):
`Informa Healthcare, Telephone House, 69-77 Paul Street, London EC2A 4LQ UK:
`Tel: +44 (0)20 7017 7657; Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 7667.
`V
`
`2007 o Informa UK Ltd ISSN l354—3784
`
`subiec=Uw~nvris~h~rLaws
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PR2015—O1776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 — 3/15
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 3/15
`
`
`
`2007 Subscription Rates — Corporate Access
`
`Titles
`
`I
`
`lssues/
`
`Print and Electronic
`
`Electronic
`
`year ;i—:. Euro
`
`US$
`
`Yen
`
`Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (EOBT)
`
`12
`
`3,100
`
`3,700
`
`459,425
`
`2,950
`
`3,520
`
`436,425
`
`Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery (EODD)
`
`Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (EODC)
`— New title for 2006!
`
`Expert Op'n'on on Drug Metabolism &
`Toxicology (EOl\/IT)
`
`Expert Opnon on Drug Safety (EODS)
`
`Expert Op'n'on on Emerging Drugs (EOED)
`
`6
`
`12
`
`6
`
`6
`
`4
`
`,900
`
`2,275
`
`282,480
`
`1,800
`
`2,160
`
`268320
`
`- ,495
`
`5,370
`
`666,400
`
`4,270
`
`5,‘l 05
`
`633,000
`
`,275
`
`1,524
`
`188,400
`
`1,200
`
`1,445
`
`178,920
`
`,900
`
`,820
`
`2,275
`
`282,480
`
`1,800
`
`2,160
`
`268,320
`
`2,105
`
`274,450
`
`1,730
`
`2,005
`
`260,700
`
`Expert Opnori on lnvestigational Drugs (EOlD)
`
`12
`
`4,810
`
`5,745
`
`713,050
`
`4,570
`
`5,465
`
`677,300
`
`EXDEFT Opnon on Pharmacotherapy (EOP)
`
`18
`
`4,300
`
`4,995
`
`649,750
`
`4,080
`
`4,745
`
`617,300
`
`Expert Opnon on Therapeutic Patents (EOTP)
`
`12
`
`5,790
`
`6,920
`
`858,355
`
`5,495
`
`6,570
`
`815,340
`
`Expert Opnon on Therapeutic Targets (EOTT)
`
`12
`
`3,155
`
`3,780
`
`468,900
`
`3,005
`
`3,590
`
`445,380
`
`All prices for a single site_
`
`PAYMENT DETAILS
`
`'
`
`-
`
`Subscribers in North America pay in US Dollars.
`Japanesesubscribers make payment in Yen via the exclusive Japanese agent, Technomics, |nc.:
`Technomics, lnc., Ohku Bldg Kyobashi 7F, 1-16-10 Kyobashi Chuo—Ku, Tokyo 104-0031, Japan
`Tel +81 <03) 3538 2531; Fax: +81 (03) 3538 2537
`Korean subscr
`ibers make payment via the exclusive agent, Pharma Koreana Ltd:
`Pharma Korea
`06 Ltd, SL Kangnam, PO Box 99, Seoul 135-600, Korea
`Tel:
`+82 <02) 554 9591; Fax: +82 (02) 557 1290
`
`ADDRESS FOR ORDERS AND ENQUIRIES
`_EXl3€Tt Opinion Marketing, lnforma Healthcare, Telephone House, 69-77 Paul Street, London, ECZA 4LQ, UK
`Tel +44 (0)20 7017 5540; Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 7850; E-mail: expertopin@informa.com
`
`REPRINTS AND SPECIAL PROJECTS
`
`We Offer 3 Speedy reprint service for bulk purchase of articles published in the Expert Opinion journals, and we are able to deliver
`ShiPm9”t5 30YWhere in the world within 3 weeks of order placement. Reprints can be supplied in standard journal format or with gloss
`colour Covers to provide you with we|l—presented, professional pieces of literature. Alternatively, you may have special requirements for
`the final presentation of the reprint, which can be arranged upon request. As well as standard English-language reprints, we can provide
`a full and accurate translation service into any language of your choice. Our Reprints Coordinator will be happy to discuss the options
`available to you. Please contact Ben Fisher for quotations:
`lnforma Healthcare, Telephone House, 69—77 Paul Street, London, EC2A 4LQ, UK
`Tel: +44 (0)20 7017 7657; Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 7667; E-mail: ben.fisher@informa.com
`
`3:-',;f,;:,‘,',.“,‘,*,,;,":1,‘,’,{‘,';'*,,°;':',‘,*‘*“"
`sub1~e»r=usc=-pvr1=h1=Law-
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PR2015—O1776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 — 4/15
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 4/15
`
`
`
`1. Introduction
`
`2. Description of onychomycosis
`
`3. Challenges to the therapy of
`onychomycosis
`
`4. Drugs currently approved for
`onychomycosis in the main
`markets
`
`5. New antifungal compounds in
`development for onychomycosis
`
`6. Discovery and characterization
`of AN-2690
`
`7. Clinical summary
`
`8. Expert opinion
`
`Review
`
`Anti-Infectives
`
`Recent progress on the topical
`therapy of onychomycosis
`
`Michael RK Alley, Stephen J Baker, Karl R Beutner & Jacob Plattner†
`†Anacor Pharmaceuticals, 1060 East Meadow Circle, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA
`
`Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the fingernails and toenails that
`results in thickening, discoloration, splitting of the nails and lifting of the nail
`from the nail bed. The disease is caused by dermatophytes and has a high
`incidence within the general population, especially among older individuals.
`Present treatment options include both oral and topical drugs, with oral
`therapies giving better outcomes; however, neither of these treatment
`options provides high cure rates that are durable. The difficulty in treating
`onychomycosis results from the deep-seated nature of the infection within
`the nail unit (nail plate, nail bed and surrounding tissue) and the inability of
`drugs to effectively reach all sites. Ongoing drug development activities have
`focused on novel delivery technologies to facilitate penetration of existing
`antifungal drugs through the nail plate and on the discovery of inherently
`penetrable antifungals. AN-2690 represents an oxaborole antifungal that is
`designed to penetrate the nail plate and is showing promising results in
`clinical trials.
`
`Keywords: antifungal agent, dermatophyte, fungal infection, leucyl-tRNA synthetase,
`nail penetration, onychomycosis, oxaborole, tinea unguium
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2):157-167
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Onychomycosisis is a progressive fungal infection of the nail unit that leads to the
`destruction and deformity of toenails and (less frequently) fingernails. This con-
`dition is common and represents ∼ 50% of all nail disorders. Onychomycosis has a
`high occurrence throughout the world, with recent epidemiological data indicat-
`ing a prevalence of 6.5 – 13.8% in North America [1]. The infection shows an
`increasing incidence in older individuals and 1 study reported that 48% of people
`[2]. The susceptibility to
`aged 70 years are infected with onychomycosis
`onychomycosis is higher in men than in women, although women seek medical
`treatment more frequently.
`The infection is caused by fungi that infect the nail unit (the nail bed, the nail
`plate and surrounding tissue) and these include yeasts, dermatophytes and other
`molds. By far the most common fungi that cause onychomycosis are the dermato-
`phytes, which account for ∼ 90% of all cases. Dermatophytes are also the cause of
`skin fungal infections [3] and many patients with a nail infection also have a co-exist-
`ing skin infection. The Trichophyton spp., Microsporum spp. and Epidermophyton
`spp. are the main causative dermatophytes, with Trichophyton rubrum and
`T. mentagraphytes representing the two most common isolates [3-5].
`
`2. Description of onychomycosis
`
`Tinea unguium is the medical term that is used to describe a nail infection caused by
`a dermatophyte, whereas onychomycosis is used more broadly to characterize all
`fungal nail infections. Distal subungual onychomycosis represents the most
`
`10.1517/13543784.16.2.157 © 2007 Informa UK Ltd ISSN 1354-3784
`
`157
`
`Downloaded by [National Library of Medicine] at 08:43 01 June 2016
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 5/15
`
`
`
`Recent progress on the topical therapy of onychomycosis
`
`common presentation of tinea unguium [6]. Distal subungual
`onychomycosis starts by the microorganism (usually a
`dermatophyte) invading the stratum corneum of the hypo-
`nychium and distal nail bed. Subsequently, the infection
`moves proximally in the nail bed and invades the ventral nail
`surface of the nail plate. The infection is characterized by dis-
`coloration, separation of the nail plate from the nail bed (ony-
`cholysis), accumulation of subungual debris and nail plate
`dystrophy. Proximal subungual onychomycosis is the least
`common variant of onychomycosis. This condition starts by
`fungal invasion of the stratum corneum of the proximal nail
`fold and subsequently of the nail plate. White superficial ony-
`chomycosis occurs when the nail plate is invaded directly by
`the causative organism and is characterized by the presence of
`white, chalky patches on the nail plate. The patches may coa-
`lesce to cover the whole nail plate. The potential end point of
`all forms of onychomycosis is total dystrophic onychomycosis
`and occurs when the entire nail plate and nail bed are invaded
`by the fungus.
`Although onychomycosis is generally not life threatening,
`the disease adversely affects the quality of life of its victims. In
`those cases in which the nail unit is seriously compromised,
`patients can experience pain and discomfort at the site of
`infection. Because of the high incidence of onychomycosis
`and the inadequacy of present treatment modalities, con-
`siderable research efforts have been directed to finding
`improved therapeutic options. This review summarizes the
`recent developments for new treatments of onychomycosis.
`
`3. Challenges to the therapy of onychomycosis
`
`Onychomycosis has proven to be a challenging infection to
`treat, with treatment failures and relapses being common
`occurrences [7-9]. In a study reported in 1998, it was found
`that 22.2% of patients whose toenail onychomycosis had been
`cured by oral therapy experienced a relapse during a 3-year
`follow-up period [10]. For an antifungal drug to be effective, it
`must disseminate throughout the nail unit and kill the patho-
`gen. When a sample taken from the nail bed of an infected
`patient shows a negative culture and negative microscopy, this
`is termed a mycological cure; however, a clinical cure includes
`not only elimination of the fungi from the nail unit but also
`the formation of clear, new nail growth that is absent of dys-
`trophic characteristics. Because of the slow rate of growth of
`toenails (∼ 1 mm/month), evidence of a clinical cure can take
`9 – 12 months. For this reason, drug treatment periods for
`onychomycosis are lengthy and require 3 – 12 months.
`During this treatment period, the infected nails can be
`monitored for growth of new clear nail and for the presence of
`viable dermatophytes.
`The current treatment modalities for onychomycosis
`include mechanical procedures, systemically administered
`antifungals and topical drug therapy. Although infected nails
`can be surgically removed, recurrence of the onychomycosis
`can occur as the new nail grows back and there is no evidence
`
`that the surgical approach is effective in producing a sustained
`disease-free period. In addition, because surgical avulsion is
`quite traumatic, this procedure is rarely used today. An alter-
`native procedure of chemically removing the nail using a urea
`ointment is also not widely used by current practitioners. In
`preference, podiatrists perform periodic trimming and debri-
`dement of affected nails as a means of reducing symptoms,
`with the added hope of minimizing progression by stabilizing
`the disease.
`Whereas mechanical procedures to treat onychomycosis
`only offer marginal benefit to the patient, drug therapies have
`provided some advancement in the attempt to effectively treat
`this disease; however, the overall success in treating ony-
`chomycosis is still far from optimal (as mentioned in
`Section 3) and this almost certainly results from the unique
`anatomical features of the nail unit and its pervasive coloniza-
`tion by dermatophytes during infection. The varied anatomy
`of the nail unit provides an opportunity for the fungal patho-
`gen to establish a deep-seated infection by invading and pro-
`liferating into the nail plate, the nail bed and the surrounding
`tissue. Systemically administered drugs must not only reach
`the nail bed but must also achieve sufficient concentration in
`the nail plate to eliminate dermatophytes at this location. It is
`more likely that systemically administered drugs reach the nail
`plate via the nail matrix, which is a continually proliferating
`epidermal tissue that serves as the origin of new nail growth.
`Access to the nail plate from the newly formed cells in the
`matrix is a slow process due to the very slow growth rate of
`toenails. As a consequence of this slow growth rate, oral ther-
`apy must be continued for some time and this may have the
`inherent disadvantage of causing systemic adverse effects.
`On the other hand, topically administered drugs face even
`more challenges to reach all of the required sites of these
`deep-seated infections. This difficulty in achieving relevant
`fungicidal concentrations throughout the nail unit directly
`relates to the nail plate’s unique properties, its thickness and
`relatively compact structure. The nail plate is a hard yet
`slightly elastic convex structure that consists of ∼ 25 layers of
`dead, keratinized, flattened cells that are tightly bound
`together. The nail plate itself consists of three layers: the dor-
`sal and intermediate layers derived from the matrix, and the
`ventral layer derived from the nail bed [11]. The upper (dorsal)
`layer is a few cell layers thick and consists of hard keratin. It
`constitutes the main barrier to drug diffusion into and
`through the nail plate. The intermediate layer constitutes
`75% of the whole nail thickness and consists of soft keratin.
`Below the intermediate layer is the ventral layer of soft kera-
`tin, a layer that is a few cells thick, that connects to the under-
`lying nail bed in which many pathological changes can occur.
`Thus achieving an effective drug concentration in the ventral
`nail plate and the nail bed is of great importance in the
`treatment of nail diseases.
`Chemically, the nail plate mainly consists of fibrous
`proteins – keratins – which are highly cross-linked with
`disulfide bonds. Coupled with the highly compact structure
`
`158
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`Downloaded by [National Library of Medicine] at 08:43 01 June 2016
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 6/15
`
`
`
`of the keratinized cells in the nail plate, these highly
`cross-linked proteins within the cells present a formidable bar-
`rier to the entry of topically applied agents [12]. In 1 study, the
`concentration of an applied drug across the nail dropped
`∼ 1000 times from the outer surface to the inner surface [13].
`As a result, the drug concentration had presumably not
`reached a therapeutically effective
`level
`in the
`inner
`ventral layer.
`Another factor contributing to the difficulty of topically
`applied antifungal drugs to penetrate the nail plate is the
`apparent mismatch of drug physicochemical properties with
`the biophysical properties of the nail plate [14]. Most existing
`antifungal drugs were originally designed for oral and/or skin
`applications and are consequently fairly lipophilic molecules,
`only sparingly soluble in water and have molecular weights of
`≥ 300 Da. On the other hand, with its dense keratin fabric
`network and a high capacity for flux of water, the nail plate
`has been described as a hydrophilic gel [15-17]. Thus most of
`the known antifungal agents will not find a compatible
`environment in traversing the nail plate.
`
`4. Drugs currently approved for
`onychomycosis in the main markets
`
`4.1 Oral agents
`Systemic drug treatment is currently the most effective
`method of treating onychomycosis. Even so, 20 – 25% of the
`patients fail to respond [18] and recurrence of disease after suc-
`cessful treatment is common. Terbinafine and itraconazole
`(Figure 1) are the two systemic treatments of choice, with ter-
`binafine showing greater efficacy and lower rates of recurrence
`than itraconazole [19].
`Terbinafine, a member of the allylamine family of
`antifungals, has a broad spectrum of activity and exerts fungi-
`cidal activity against most fungal pathogens. This compound
`also inhibits squalene epoxidase, an important enzyme in the
`biosynthesis of
`the
`essential membrane
`component
`ergosterol [20]. Terbinafine is active against dermatophytes,
`Malassezia furfur, Aspergillus spp. and some Candida spp.
`(including Candida parapsilosis). A single dose of terbinafine
`250 mg p.o. administered to humans produces peak plasma
`concentrations of 1 µg/ml within 2 h. It is > 99% protein
`bound and has a half-life of ∼ 36 h. It is administered at a
`dose of 250 mg q.d. with treatment duration of 6 and
`12 weeks for fungal infection of the fingernail and toenail,
`respectively. Using this regimen, 38.2% of toenails showed a
`clinical cure when examined at 48 weeks [21]. Therapeutic lev-
`els of drug persist in the nail for 3 – 6 months after therapy is
`discontinued. Liver toxicity has been reported for terbinafine
`and hepatic function tests are recommended for patients who
`use terbinafine continuously for > 6 weeks. Terbinafine is
`metabolized by CYP enzymes and has been noted to have a
`number of drug interactions [22].
`Itraconazole, which is from the azole class of antifungal
`agents, inhibits lanosterol 14α-demethylase and thus stops
`
`Alley, Baker, Beutner & Plattner
`
`the biosynthesis of ergosterol. It has a broad spectrum of
`activity against species including dermatophytes, Candida
`spp., Aspergillus spp. and M. furfur [23]. Blood levels of
`itraconazole after a single dose of 200 mg administered to
`humans reached a peak level of 0.2 – 0.3 µg/ml after 4 – 5 h.
`It is 99.8% protein bound and has a half-life of 21 h. It is
`administered as either 200 mg q.d. for 12 weeks or 200 mg
`b.i.d. for 7 days, followed by 3 weeks with no treatment and
`repeated for 3 months [22]. Therapeutic levels of itraconazole
`persist in the nail for 3 – 6 weeks after therapy is discontin-
`ued. Itraconazole has also been associated with liver damage
`and liver function tests are required if continuous treatment
`exceeds 1 month. This agent specifically inhibits the CYP3A4
`isoenzyme system and may consequently increase plasma
`concentrations of drugs metabolized by this pathway [22].
`Griseofulvin (Figure 1) is a natural product that was isolated
`from Penicillium griseofulvin in 1939 [24] and has been used
`for treating dermatophytosis since its introduction in 1958.
`Griseofulvin acts by binding to microtubular proteins, which
`results in the inhibition of cell mitosis and the formation of
`multinucleated fungal cells [25]. The drug is administered
`orally and is effective against a wide variety of dermatophytes.
`Griseofulvin has been used in complicated, difficult to treat
`tinea capitis and onychomycosis.
`Fluconazole is an orally active, synthetic, bis-triazole anti-
`fungal agent with activity against a wide range of fungi,
`including most Candida spp. and (as with other azoles) inhib-
`its lanosterol 14α-demethylase. Although fluconazole is not
`approved in the US or Europe for the treatment of ony-
`chomycosis, it is used off-label for this indication. A number
`of clinical trials studying the kinetics and efficacy of
`fluconazole have been reported [22].
`
`4.2 Topical agents
`Treatment of onychomycosis by topical methods has been met
`with limited success for the reasons described in Section 3.
`The two main topical treatments that are used today are
`ciclopirox and amorolfine (Figure 2), both of which are formu-
`lated in lacquers that are painted onto the infected nails. The
`lacquer dries to leave a water-insoluble film on top of the
`infected nail, which subsequently acts like a drug depot releas-
`ing the drug into the nail plate. Ciclopirox is a synthetic com-
`pound and is a member of the hydroxypyridone family of
`antifungal agents. The hydroxypyridone antifungals are active
`against many pathogenic fungi such as dermatophytes,
`M. furfur and Candida spp. Ciclopirox is believed to work by
`inhibiting metal-dependant enzymes by chelating the poly-
`valent cations (Fe3+ or Al3+) [26,27]. Ciclopirox has antifungal,
`antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities. It is admin-
`istered to the infected nails daily and this treatment regimen
`continues for ≥ 6 months. Ciclopirox persists in the nail for
`14 days after therapy is completed. Clinical response rates for
`the treatment of onychomycosis are in the range of 7 – 10%.
`Amorolfine belongs to the morpholine group of synthetic
`antifungal agents. Its mechanism of action involves the
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`159
`
`Downloaded by [National Library of Medicine] at 08:43 01 June 2016
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 7/15
`
`
`
`Recent progress on the topical therapy of onychomycosis
`
`Cl
`
`Cl
`
`O
`
`O
`
`Cl
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`Itraconazole
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N
`
`O
`
`Griseofulvin
`
`Terbinafine
`
`Figure 1. Chemical structures of itraconazole, griseofulvin and terbinafine.
`
`N
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N O
`
`H
`
`Ciclopirox
`
`Amorolfine
`
`Figure 2. Chemical structures of ciclopirox and amorolfine.
`
`the ergosterol
`in
`important steps
`two
`inhibition of
`pathway [28]. Amorolfine is fungicidal against C. albicans and
`T. mentagrophytes. It is administered once or twice weekly to
`the infected nails for 6 – 12 months and (as with ciclopirox)
`persists in the nail for 14 days after therapy is completed.
`
`5. New antifungal compounds in development
`for onychomycosis
`
`Due to the treatment limitations described in Section 3 for
`onychomycosis, it is not surprising that significant R&D
`efforts have focused on the discovery of improved therapies.
`In general, these efforts have emphasized eliminating the defi-
`ciencies of currently approved drugs, which include long
`treatment times, concurrent side effects of oral drugs and poor
`efficacy of topical agents. The new treatment modalities that
`are presently in clinical development for onychomycosis are
`listed in Table 1.
`As noted from the entries in Table 1, most of the
`approaches represent re-formulations of known antifungal
`compounds with penetration enhancers in an effort to
`
`increase penetration of the active agent into and through the
`nail plate. The only systemic drug in development is itracon-
`azole (Hyphanox™), which is being developed by Barrier
`Therapeutics as a once-daily oral formulation. With respect
`to topical treatments for onychomycosis, the use of novel
`delivery vehicles and permeation enhancers applied to exist-
`ing classes of antifungals (e.g., azoles or allyl amines) repre-
`sents the main R&D approach that has been pursued over
`the past 10 years. Very little work has been reported on
`approaches focusing on discovering antifungal compounds
`that have intrinsic nail-penetrating properties. S-291-ND is
`one such compound and involves the use of a topical
`NO-generating formulation that can be applied directly to
`the toenail. NO is a highly reactive molecule that has anti-
`microbial activity [29] and may also have intrinsic nail-pene-
`trating capabilities due to is low molecular weight. The
`other novel approach is represented by the boron-containing
`antifungal compound, AN-2690. Now in clinical trials, this
`agent was specifically designed to overcome the nail barrier
`when applied topically so that
`it can achieve high
`concentrations in the nail bed [30].
`
`160
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`Downloaded by [National Library of Medicine] at 08:43 01 June 2016
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 8/15
`
`
`
`Alley, Baker, Beutner & Plattner
`
`Table 1. Onychomycosis treatments in clinical development.
`
`Compound
`
`Abafungin (Abasol™,
`York Pharma)
`Topical butenafine gel
`AN-2690
`
`NM-100060
`Itraconazole (Hyphanox™,
`Barrier Therapeutics)
`Organo-gel delivery of
`allylamine antifungals
`Topical NO (S-291-ND)
`Onycofitex
`Transdermal SEPA®
`
`Company
`
`York Pharma
`
`Mylan
`Anacor
`Pharmaceuticals
`NexMed/Novartis
`Barrier
`Therapeutics
`MediQuest
`Therapeutics
`ProStrakan
`Bentley Pharma
`MacroChem
`
`Stage
`
`Description
`
`Pre-registration
`(in UK)
`Phase III
`Phase II
`
`Phase II
`Phase II
`
`Phase II
`
`A topical 2-aminothiazole membrane intergity antagonist
`
`Topical formulation of ergosterol synthesis inhibitor butenafine
`Topical boron-containing antifungal with inherent nail-penetrating
`characteristics
`Topical formulation of terbinafine with penetration enhancer
`Once-daily oral formulation of itraconazole in 200-mg tablets
`
`Proprietary organo-gel delivery of naftifine or terbinafine
`
`Phase II (in UK)
`Phase I/II
`Phase I
`
`Cream formulation of NO precursors that liberate NO on the nail
`Antifungal nail lacquer formulation of clotrimazole
`Econazole in a nail lacquer with SEPA, a transdermal absorption
`enhancer
`
`6. Discovery and characterization of AN-2690
`
`6.1 Designing a compound to penetrate the nail plate
`Given the many failures and poor efficacy of topical treat-
`ments using known antifungal agents [31], a completely new
`approach was contemplated. Topical antifungal agents are
`applied to the outer surface (dorsal layer) of the nail plate and
`treatment is then dependent on the passive diffusion of the
`drug through this thick, keratin-rich, lipid-containing barrier.
`Several reviews on onychomycosis therapy suggest that topical
`antifungal drugs fail in clinical trials because of the lack of
`penetration of the drug through the nail plate [11,32,33]. To the
`authors’ knowledge, there has been no reported chemical opti-
`mization effort to identify an antifungal agent for delivery
`through a nail plate to treat onychomycosis topically.
`Studies have shown that nail penetration is dependent on
`molecular weight, octanol:water partition coefficient and
`water solubility, with smaller, more polar, water-soluble mol-
`ecules capable of penetrating to a greater extent than larger
`lipophilic molecules [15,34]. In addition to keratin, the nail
`plate contains lipids but (unlike the skin) these are not at such
`high concentrations; furthermore, t