throbber
E393?! opinion on iIl‘I€!f~:U«LéaIi<)na1 drug‘;
`1701“ ~ Ge-r‘:+:r;::S C::‘3?!42;.:?:'c‘»n 1
`:;-=.:<::s2;~,s
`
`estigational Drugs
`
`3:8;
`8Z>~
`t‘_’.U
`E0 -
`~=——
`ca
`
`Ezgm
`E255
`
`_§,//4%m§ LIBRARYOF
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 1/15
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 1/15
`
`

`
`February 2007 Vol. 16 No.2
`
`E)_<pert
`Opmion on lnvestigational Drugs
`
`Forthcoming articles
`- lnvelstigational agents against
`D|atinurri—resistant ovarian cancer
`- Emerging drug therapies for preventing
`. sporitarieous preterm labour and preterm birth
`lenew paradigm in the treatment of
`co orectal cancer: are we hitting the right
`target?
`
`.
`
`' Beyond heparin and warfarin: the new
`0
`_ ’
`'
`r
`_
`.
`‘
`generation of anticoagulants
`?:‘\;'E°'_C ‘Will Physiological mechanisms and
`Lations for treating diabetes and the
`_
`.
`.
`.
`metabolic Syndrome
`RY 720- 3 Sphlngolipid mimetic in
`tra'r:‘S‘g‘t°”l9dUl6lIqn: how a novel mechanism
`es into clinical benefit
`- Ma '
`‘
`.
`Canfgleprulatlon of the NGF network in prostate
`- lnvestigational a em
`Albsqelated Ka§lOSi'SSSfaC:I‘C(l.)rr::trTieTiI of
`0 Te|avancin' a novel
`‘
`-
`'
`l'F’09| co
`'
`G,am_p0SmVe mfediOmY Peptide for serious
`
`Perspective
`129 Discontinued drugs in 2005:
`endocrine and metabolic
`JR Co/ca
`
`Drug Evaluations
`Z25 AZD6140
`
`U5 Tantr;/,
`PA Gurbel
`
`/<P B//den &
`
`Reviews
`
`137
`
`lnvestigationaltreatments
`for postoperative surgical
`site infections
`6 Pou/akou & H G/amare//ou
`
`157 Recent progress on the
`topical therapy of
`onychomycosis
`/VIRKA//ey/, 51 Baker, KR Beutner
`& J P/attner
`
`169 Pharmacological therapy of
`atrial fibrillation
`/</< Patton & RL Page
`
`181 Treatment of opioid-induced
`gut dysfunction
`P Ho/zer
`
`195 Peroxisome proliferator—
`activated receptor—y ligands
`as bone turnover modulators
`
`C G/aginis,
`A Tsant//i—Kakou//dou &
`S Theocharis
`
`231 Liraglutide: a once—dai|y
`GLP—1 analogue for the
`treatment of Type 2 diabetes
`mellitus
`TV//sbo//
`
`239 Vandetanib(ZD6474):
`an orally available receptor
`tyrosine kinase inhibitor that
`selectively targets pathways
`critical for tumor growth and
`angiogenesis
`R5 Herbst, JV Heymach,
`MS O‘Re///i/, A Orin &
`AJ Ryan
`
`Key Paper Evaluation
`251 Natural product promotes
`repair of injured spinal cord
`M Braddock
`
`Meeting Highlights
`257 Advances in
`
`Anti—|nf|ammatory
`Therapeutics
`ll/I Braddock
`
`209 Use of botulinum toxins in
`cancer therapy
`R Ans/‘aux & B Ga//ez
`
`Appendices
`263 Glossary
`265 Acknowledgements
`
`
`F?
`
`219 A review of the current
`clinical trials for
`
`gastroenteropancreatic
`neuroendocrine tumours
`
`JR Strosberg & L/< Kvols
`
`informa
`healthcare
`
`2007 © lnlorma UK Ltd ISSN l354-3784
`
`T-his mateiri al was copiedi
`at tlh-E MLM andl irnay lbe
`5lJlbjECt US Copyright Laws
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 2/15
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 2/15
`
`

`
`Editorial Office
`Informa Healthcare, Telephone House,
`69-77 Paul Street, London, EC2A 4l,Q, UK.
`
`Tel: +44 (0)20 7017 7650
`Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 7667
`E—mail: eoid@informa.com
`Web: www.expertopin.com
`
`Commissioning Editor: Jessica Knights
`Production Editor: Surnayya Patel
`Drug Evaluations Editor: Monica Williams
`Publisher: Phil Garner
`
`Senior Advisory Panel
`Chairman: Fitzgerald JD: Materia Medica, UK
`Abou—Gharbia M: Wyeth-Ayerst, USA
`Baldwin JJ: Pharmacopeia, USA
`Buckel P: Boeliringer Mannheim, Germany
`Duncan WAM: RW Johnson, USA
`Evans C; Chiroscience, UK
`Gillis S: Corixa, USA
`Harrap K: Inst. Cancer Research, UK
`Hoyer D: Novartis, Switzerland
`Humphrey PPA: GlaxoSmithKline, UK
`Krogsgaard Thomsen M: Novo, Denmark
`Moncada S: The Cruciform Project, UK
`Morich F-J: Bayer, Germany
`Okazaki H: Takeda, Japan
`Paioni R: Novartis, Switzerlarid
`Poste 6: Health Technology Networks, USA
`Ringrose PS: Bristol—Myers Squibb, USA
`Boss BC: GlaxoSmithK|ine, UK
`Setoyama O: Chugai, Japan
`Sugino Y: Takeda, Japan
`Timmermanns P: DuPont, USA
`Weston A: Univ. Manchester, UK
`
`Section Editorial Board
`
`Pulmonary-Allergy, Dermatological,
`Gastrointestinal & Arthritis
`Bacon K, Farthing MJ, Foster M, Norris A,
`Richards IM, Roomans GM, Snell NJ, Taylor PC,
`Warne P
`Anti-infectives
`Blondeau J, Bryskier A, Bucklieit R, Chopra 1,
`Clerici M, Georgopapadakou N, Neamati N,
`Ryder N,
`l'uril< M
`Endocrine & Metabolic
`Brandi ML, Colca J, Dujovne C,
`Fuller P, Kowluru R, McCormack J, Proietto J,
`Whitfield J
`
`Central & Peripheral Nervous Systems
`Gurwitz D, Hill R6, Kloog Y, Palacios JM.
`Panetta JA, Schachter S, Tamminga C, Tariot P,
`Wood M
`
`Cardiovascular & Renal
`Barton M, Danser AHJ, Herbert J—M,
`Holvoet P, Ruflolo RR, von l-laehling S,
`Winkelmann BR
`Oncologic
`Denny WA, Kelland L, Koutsilieris M,
`Papavassiliou AG, Sawyer TK, Udayan D,
`Williams R, Zhang W
`
`_
`E)_(p_ert
`Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs
`
`Aims and scope
`
`Expert Opinion on lnvestigarional Drugs is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, evaluating
`developments in pharmaceutical research, from animal studies through to the launch of a new
`medicine. The journal is divided into six therapeutic areas:
`
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`-
`
`Pulmonary-Allergy, Dermatological, Gastrointestinal & Arthritis
`Anti-Infectives
`Endocrine 8r Metabolic
`
`Central 84 Peripheral Nervous Systems
`Cardiovascular & Renal
`
`- Oncologic
`
`Each section is reviewed regularly, allowing comprehensive coverage of the most important
`topics. Authors are encouraged to express their Expert Opinion of the status of the research
`under review, rather than to simply review the available data.
`
`Editorial policy
`Articles published in Expert Opinion on /ni/est/gationa/ Drugs are commissioned by the Editor in
`collaboration with the Section Editorial Board. Authors who wish to contribute should contact
`the Editor. All reviews and drug evaluations are subject to peer—review.
`
`Editorial boards
`
`The Senior Advisory Panel and Section Editorial Board are composed of Senior Scientists
`involved in drug research and development. The Senior Advisory Panel is responsible for the
`development of the journal, while the Section Editors are responsible for selecting authors and
`topics for review to ensure comprehensive coverage of subjects in each therapeutic area,
`Sources
`
`Permission has been kindly granted by the publisher of the following information source for
`Informa UK Ltd to provide its authors with relevant source material for use solely in the
`preparation of their reviews for Expert Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs;
`Investigational Drugs database (© Current Drugs Ltd.)
`
`Citations
`
`Expert Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs is indexed by:
`Chemical Abstracts
`Current Contents”/Life Sciences
`EMBASE/Excerpta Medica
`ISI Alerting Services
`Index Medicus/Medline
`Science Citations lndex—Expanded
`
`Copyright and disclaimer
`
`Conditions of sale - Expert Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs may be circulated only to those
`members of staff who are employed at the site at which the subscription is taken out, Readers
`are reminded that, under internationally agreed copyright legislation, photocopying of
`copyright materials is prohibited other than on a limited basis for personal use, This means that
`making copies of any article published in Expert Opinion on lnvestigational Drugs is ,3 breach of
`the law and can be prosecuted.
`
`Whilst every effort is made by the publishers and advisory board to ensure that no inaccurate or
`misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make it clear that
`the data and opinions appearing herein are the responsibility of the contributor concemed
`Accordingly, the publishers, advisory board, editors and their respective employees, officers and
`agents accept no liability whatsoever for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading
`data, opinions or statements. Approved product information should always be reviewed prior
`to prescribing.
`
`For reprint enquiries, please contact Ben Fisher (ben.fisher@informa.com):
`Informa Healthcare, Telephone House, 69-77 Paul Street, London EC2A 4LQ UK:
`Tel: +44 (0)20 7017 7657; Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 7667.
`V
`
`2007 o Informa UK Ltd ISSN l354—3784
`
`subiec=Uw~nvris~h~rLaws
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PR2015—O1776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 — 3/15
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 3/15
`
`

`
`2007 Subscription Rates — Corporate Access
`
`Titles
`
`I
`
`lssues/
`
`Print and Electronic
`
`Electronic
`
`year ;i—:. Euro
`
`US$
`
`Yen
`
`Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (EOBT)
`
`12
`
`3,100
`
`3,700
`
`459,425
`
`2,950
`
`3,520
`
`436,425
`
`Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery (EODD)
`
`Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (EODC)
`— New title for 2006!
`
`Expert Op'n'on on Drug Metabolism &
`Toxicology (EOl\/IT)
`
`Expert Opnon on Drug Safety (EODS)
`
`Expert Op'n'on on Emerging Drugs (EOED)
`
`6
`
`12
`
`6
`
`6
`
`4
`
`,900
`
`2,275
`
`282,480
`
`1,800
`
`2,160
`
`268320
`
`- ,495
`
`5,370
`
`666,400
`
`4,270
`
`5,‘l 05
`
`633,000
`
`,275
`
`1,524
`
`188,400
`
`1,200
`
`1,445
`
`178,920
`
`,900
`
`,820
`
`2,275
`
`282,480
`
`1,800
`
`2,160
`
`268,320
`
`2,105
`
`274,450
`
`1,730
`
`2,005
`
`260,700
`
`Expert Opnori on lnvestigational Drugs (EOlD)
`
`12
`
`4,810
`
`5,745
`
`713,050
`
`4,570
`
`5,465
`
`677,300
`
`EXDEFT Opnon on Pharmacotherapy (EOP)
`
`18
`
`4,300
`
`4,995
`
`649,750
`
`4,080
`
`4,745
`
`617,300
`
`Expert Opnon on Therapeutic Patents (EOTP)
`
`12
`
`5,790
`
`6,920
`
`858,355
`
`5,495
`
`6,570
`
`815,340
`
`Expert Opnon on Therapeutic Targets (EOTT)
`
`12
`
`3,155
`
`3,780
`
`468,900
`
`3,005
`
`3,590
`
`445,380
`
`All prices for a single site_
`
`PAYMENT DETAILS
`
`'
`
`-
`
`Subscribers in North America pay in US Dollars.
`Japanesesubscribers make payment in Yen via the exclusive Japanese agent, Technomics, |nc.:
`Technomics, lnc., Ohku Bldg Kyobashi 7F, 1-16-10 Kyobashi Chuo—Ku, Tokyo 104-0031, Japan
`Tel +81 <03) 3538 2531; Fax: +81 (03) 3538 2537
`Korean subscr
`ibers make payment via the exclusive agent, Pharma Koreana Ltd:
`Pharma Korea
`06 Ltd, SL Kangnam, PO Box 99, Seoul 135-600, Korea
`Tel:
`+82 <02) 554 9591; Fax: +82 (02) 557 1290
`
`ADDRESS FOR ORDERS AND ENQUIRIES
`_EXl3€Tt Opinion Marketing, lnforma Healthcare, Telephone House, 69-77 Paul Street, London, ECZA 4LQ, UK
`Tel +44 (0)20 7017 5540; Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 7850; E-mail: expertopin@informa.com
`
`REPRINTS AND SPECIAL PROJECTS
`
`We Offer 3 Speedy reprint service for bulk purchase of articles published in the Expert Opinion journals, and we are able to deliver
`ShiPm9”t5 30YWhere in the world within 3 weeks of order placement. Reprints can be supplied in standard journal format or with gloss
`colour Covers to provide you with we|l—presented, professional pieces of literature. Alternatively, you may have special requirements for
`the final presentation of the reprint, which can be arranged upon request. As well as standard English-language reprints, we can provide
`a full and accurate translation service into any language of your choice. Our Reprints Coordinator will be happy to discuss the options
`available to you. Please contact Ben Fisher for quotations:
`lnforma Healthcare, Telephone House, 69—77 Paul Street, London, EC2A 4LQ, UK
`Tel: +44 (0)20 7017 7657; Fax: +44 (0)20 7017 7667; E-mail: ben.fisher@informa.com
`
`3:-',;f,;:,‘,',.“,‘,*,,;,":1,‘,’,{‘,';'*,,°;':',‘,*‘*“"
`sub1~e»r=usc=-pvr1=h1=Law-
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, |PR2015—O1776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 — 4/15
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 4/15
`
`

`
`1. Introduction
`
`2. Description of onychomycosis
`
`3. Challenges to the therapy of
`onychomycosis
`
`4. Drugs currently approved for
`onychomycosis in the main
`markets
`
`5. New antifungal compounds in
`development for onychomycosis
`
`6. Discovery and characterization
`of AN-2690
`
`7. Clinical summary
`
`8. Expert opinion
`
`Review
`
`Anti-Infectives
`
`Recent progress on the topical
`therapy of onychomycosis
`
`Michael RK Alley, Stephen J Baker, Karl R Beutner & Jacob Plattner†
`†Anacor Pharmaceuticals, 1060 East Meadow Circle, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA
`
`Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the fingernails and toenails that
`results in thickening, discoloration, splitting of the nails and lifting of the nail
`from the nail bed. The disease is caused by dermatophytes and has a high
`incidence within the general population, especially among older individuals.
`Present treatment options include both oral and topical drugs, with oral
`therapies giving better outcomes; however, neither of these treatment
`options provides high cure rates that are durable. The difficulty in treating
`onychomycosis results from the deep-seated nature of the infection within
`the nail unit (nail plate, nail bed and surrounding tissue) and the inability of
`drugs to effectively reach all sites. Ongoing drug development activities have
`focused on novel delivery technologies to facilitate penetration of existing
`antifungal drugs through the nail plate and on the discovery of inherently
`penetrable antifungals. AN-2690 represents an oxaborole antifungal that is
`designed to penetrate the nail plate and is showing promising results in
`clinical trials.
`
`Keywords: antifungal agent, dermatophyte, fungal infection, leucyl-tRNA synthetase,
`nail penetration, onychomycosis, oxaborole, tinea unguium
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2):157-167
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Onychomycosisis is a progressive fungal infection of the nail unit that leads to the
`destruction and deformity of toenails and (less frequently) fingernails. This con-
`dition is common and represents ∼ 50% of all nail disorders. Onychomycosis has a
`high occurrence throughout the world, with recent epidemiological data indicat-
`ing a prevalence of 6.5 – 13.8% in North America [1]. The infection shows an
`increasing incidence in older individuals and 1 study reported that 48% of people
`[2]. The susceptibility to
`aged 70 years are infected with onychomycosis
`onychomycosis is higher in men than in women, although women seek medical
`treatment more frequently.
`The infection is caused by fungi that infect the nail unit (the nail bed, the nail
`plate and surrounding tissue) and these include yeasts, dermatophytes and other
`molds. By far the most common fungi that cause onychomycosis are the dermato-
`phytes, which account for ∼ 90% of all cases. Dermatophytes are also the cause of
`skin fungal infections [3] and many patients with a nail infection also have a co-exist-
`ing skin infection. The Trichophyton spp., Microsporum spp. and Epidermophyton
`spp. are the main causative dermatophytes, with Trichophyton rubrum and
`T. mentagraphytes representing the two most common isolates [3-5].
`
`2. Description of onychomycosis
`
`Tinea unguium is the medical term that is used to describe a nail infection caused by
`a dermatophyte, whereas onychomycosis is used more broadly to characterize all
`fungal nail infections. Distal subungual onychomycosis represents the most
`
`10.1517/13543784.16.2.157 © 2007 Informa UK Ltd ISSN 1354-3784
`
`157
`
`Downloaded by [National Library of Medicine] at 08:43 01 June 2016
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 5/15
`
`

`
`Recent progress on the topical therapy of onychomycosis
`
`common presentation of tinea unguium [6]. Distal subungual
`onychomycosis starts by the microorganism (usually a
`dermatophyte) invading the stratum corneum of the hypo-
`nychium and distal nail bed. Subsequently, the infection
`moves proximally in the nail bed and invades the ventral nail
`surface of the nail plate. The infection is characterized by dis-
`coloration, separation of the nail plate from the nail bed (ony-
`cholysis), accumulation of subungual debris and nail plate
`dystrophy. Proximal subungual onychomycosis is the least
`common variant of onychomycosis. This condition starts by
`fungal invasion of the stratum corneum of the proximal nail
`fold and subsequently of the nail plate. White superficial ony-
`chomycosis occurs when the nail plate is invaded directly by
`the causative organism and is characterized by the presence of
`white, chalky patches on the nail plate. The patches may coa-
`lesce to cover the whole nail plate. The potential end point of
`all forms of onychomycosis is total dystrophic onychomycosis
`and occurs when the entire nail plate and nail bed are invaded
`by the fungus.
`Although onychomycosis is generally not life threatening,
`the disease adversely affects the quality of life of its victims. In
`those cases in which the nail unit is seriously compromised,
`patients can experience pain and discomfort at the site of
`infection. Because of the high incidence of onychomycosis
`and the inadequacy of present treatment modalities, con-
`siderable research efforts have been directed to finding
`improved therapeutic options. This review summarizes the
`recent developments for new treatments of onychomycosis.
`
`3. Challenges to the therapy of onychomycosis
`
`Onychomycosis has proven to be a challenging infection to
`treat, with treatment failures and relapses being common
`occurrences [7-9]. In a study reported in 1998, it was found
`that 22.2% of patients whose toenail onychomycosis had been
`cured by oral therapy experienced a relapse during a 3-year
`follow-up period [10]. For an antifungal drug to be effective, it
`must disseminate throughout the nail unit and kill the patho-
`gen. When a sample taken from the nail bed of an infected
`patient shows a negative culture and negative microscopy, this
`is termed a mycological cure; however, a clinical cure includes
`not only elimination of the fungi from the nail unit but also
`the formation of clear, new nail growth that is absent of dys-
`trophic characteristics. Because of the slow rate of growth of
`toenails (∼ 1 mm/month), evidence of a clinical cure can take
`9 – 12 months. For this reason, drug treatment periods for
`onychomycosis are lengthy and require 3 – 12 months.
`During this treatment period, the infected nails can be
`monitored for growth of new clear nail and for the presence of
`viable dermatophytes.
`The current treatment modalities for onychomycosis
`include mechanical procedures, systemically administered
`antifungals and topical drug therapy. Although infected nails
`can be surgically removed, recurrence of the onychomycosis
`can occur as the new nail grows back and there is no evidence
`
`that the surgical approach is effective in producing a sustained
`disease-free period. In addition, because surgical avulsion is
`quite traumatic, this procedure is rarely used today. An alter-
`native procedure of chemically removing the nail using a urea
`ointment is also not widely used by current practitioners. In
`preference, podiatrists perform periodic trimming and debri-
`dement of affected nails as a means of reducing symptoms,
`with the added hope of minimizing progression by stabilizing
`the disease.
`Whereas mechanical procedures to treat onychomycosis
`only offer marginal benefit to the patient, drug therapies have
`provided some advancement in the attempt to effectively treat
`this disease; however, the overall success in treating ony-
`chomycosis is still far from optimal (as mentioned in
`Section 3) and this almost certainly results from the unique
`anatomical features of the nail unit and its pervasive coloniza-
`tion by dermatophytes during infection. The varied anatomy
`of the nail unit provides an opportunity for the fungal patho-
`gen to establish a deep-seated infection by invading and pro-
`liferating into the nail plate, the nail bed and the surrounding
`tissue. Systemically administered drugs must not only reach
`the nail bed but must also achieve sufficient concentration in
`the nail plate to eliminate dermatophytes at this location. It is
`more likely that systemically administered drugs reach the nail
`plate via the nail matrix, which is a continually proliferating
`epidermal tissue that serves as the origin of new nail growth.
`Access to the nail plate from the newly formed cells in the
`matrix is a slow process due to the very slow growth rate of
`toenails. As a consequence of this slow growth rate, oral ther-
`apy must be continued for some time and this may have the
`inherent disadvantage of causing systemic adverse effects.
`On the other hand, topically administered drugs face even
`more challenges to reach all of the required sites of these
`deep-seated infections. This difficulty in achieving relevant
`fungicidal concentrations throughout the nail unit directly
`relates to the nail plate’s unique properties, its thickness and
`relatively compact structure. The nail plate is a hard yet
`slightly elastic convex structure that consists of ∼ 25 layers of
`dead, keratinized, flattened cells that are tightly bound
`together. The nail plate itself consists of three layers: the dor-
`sal and intermediate layers derived from the matrix, and the
`ventral layer derived from the nail bed [11]. The upper (dorsal)
`layer is a few cell layers thick and consists of hard keratin. It
`constitutes the main barrier to drug diffusion into and
`through the nail plate. The intermediate layer constitutes
`75% of the whole nail thickness and consists of soft keratin.
`Below the intermediate layer is the ventral layer of soft kera-
`tin, a layer that is a few cells thick, that connects to the under-
`lying nail bed in which many pathological changes can occur.
`Thus achieving an effective drug concentration in the ventral
`nail plate and the nail bed is of great importance in the
`treatment of nail diseases.
`Chemically, the nail plate mainly consists of fibrous
`proteins – keratins – which are highly cross-linked with
`disulfide bonds. Coupled with the highly compact structure
`
`158
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`Downloaded by [National Library of Medicine] at 08:43 01 June 2016
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 6/15
`
`

`
`of the keratinized cells in the nail plate, these highly
`cross-linked proteins within the cells present a formidable bar-
`rier to the entry of topically applied agents [12]. In 1 study, the
`concentration of an applied drug across the nail dropped
`∼ 1000 times from the outer surface to the inner surface [13].
`As a result, the drug concentration had presumably not
`reached a therapeutically effective
`level
`in the
`inner
`ventral layer.
`Another factor contributing to the difficulty of topically
`applied antifungal drugs to penetrate the nail plate is the
`apparent mismatch of drug physicochemical properties with
`the biophysical properties of the nail plate [14]. Most existing
`antifungal drugs were originally designed for oral and/or skin
`applications and are consequently fairly lipophilic molecules,
`only sparingly soluble in water and have molecular weights of
`≥ 300 Da. On the other hand, with its dense keratin fabric
`network and a high capacity for flux of water, the nail plate
`has been described as a hydrophilic gel [15-17]. Thus most of
`the known antifungal agents will not find a compatible
`environment in traversing the nail plate.
`
`4. Drugs currently approved for
`onychomycosis in the main markets
`
`4.1 Oral agents
`Systemic drug treatment is currently the most effective
`method of treating onychomycosis. Even so, 20 – 25% of the
`patients fail to respond [18] and recurrence of disease after suc-
`cessful treatment is common. Terbinafine and itraconazole
`(Figure 1) are the two systemic treatments of choice, with ter-
`binafine showing greater efficacy and lower rates of recurrence
`than itraconazole [19].
`Terbinafine, a member of the allylamine family of
`antifungals, has a broad spectrum of activity and exerts fungi-
`cidal activity against most fungal pathogens. This compound
`also inhibits squalene epoxidase, an important enzyme in the
`biosynthesis of
`the
`essential membrane
`component
`ergosterol [20]. Terbinafine is active against dermatophytes,
`Malassezia furfur, Aspergillus spp. and some Candida spp.
`(including Candida parapsilosis). A single dose of terbinafine
`250 mg p.o. administered to humans produces peak plasma
`concentrations of 1 µg/ml within 2 h. It is > 99% protein
`bound and has a half-life of ∼ 36 h. It is administered at a
`dose of 250 mg q.d. with treatment duration of 6 and
`12 weeks for fungal infection of the fingernail and toenail,
`respectively. Using this regimen, 38.2% of toenails showed a
`clinical cure when examined at 48 weeks [21]. Therapeutic lev-
`els of drug persist in the nail for 3 – 6 months after therapy is
`discontinued. Liver toxicity has been reported for terbinafine
`and hepatic function tests are recommended for patients who
`use terbinafine continuously for > 6 weeks. Terbinafine is
`metabolized by CYP enzymes and has been noted to have a
`number of drug interactions [22].
`Itraconazole, which is from the azole class of antifungal
`agents, inhibits lanosterol 14α-demethylase and thus stops
`
`Alley, Baker, Beutner & Plattner
`
`the biosynthesis of ergosterol. It has a broad spectrum of
`activity against species including dermatophytes, Candida
`spp., Aspergillus spp. and M. furfur [23]. Blood levels of
`itraconazole after a single dose of 200 mg administered to
`humans reached a peak level of 0.2 – 0.3 µg/ml after 4 – 5 h.
`It is 99.8% protein bound and has a half-life of 21 h. It is
`administered as either 200 mg q.d. for 12 weeks or 200 mg
`b.i.d. for 7 days, followed by 3 weeks with no treatment and
`repeated for 3 months [22]. Therapeutic levels of itraconazole
`persist in the nail for 3 – 6 weeks after therapy is discontin-
`ued. Itraconazole has also been associated with liver damage
`and liver function tests are required if continuous treatment
`exceeds 1 month. This agent specifically inhibits the CYP3A4
`isoenzyme system and may consequently increase plasma
`concentrations of drugs metabolized by this pathway [22].
`Griseofulvin (Figure 1) is a natural product that was isolated
`from Penicillium griseofulvin in 1939 [24] and has been used
`for treating dermatophytosis since its introduction in 1958.
`Griseofulvin acts by binding to microtubular proteins, which
`results in the inhibition of cell mitosis and the formation of
`multinucleated fungal cells [25]. The drug is administered
`orally and is effective against a wide variety of dermatophytes.
`Griseofulvin has been used in complicated, difficult to treat
`tinea capitis and onychomycosis.
`Fluconazole is an orally active, synthetic, bis-triazole anti-
`fungal agent with activity against a wide range of fungi,
`including most Candida spp. and (as with other azoles) inhib-
`its lanosterol 14α-demethylase. Although fluconazole is not
`approved in the US or Europe for the treatment of ony-
`chomycosis, it is used off-label for this indication. A number
`of clinical trials studying the kinetics and efficacy of
`fluconazole have been reported [22].
`
`4.2 Topical agents
`Treatment of onychomycosis by topical methods has been met
`with limited success for the reasons described in Section 3.
`The two main topical treatments that are used today are
`ciclopirox and amorolfine (Figure 2), both of which are formu-
`lated in lacquers that are painted onto the infected nails. The
`lacquer dries to leave a water-insoluble film on top of the
`infected nail, which subsequently acts like a drug depot releas-
`ing the drug into the nail plate. Ciclopirox is a synthetic com-
`pound and is a member of the hydroxypyridone family of
`antifungal agents. The hydroxypyridone antifungals are active
`against many pathogenic fungi such as dermatophytes,
`M. furfur and Candida spp. Ciclopirox is believed to work by
`inhibiting metal-dependant enzymes by chelating the poly-
`valent cations (Fe3+ or Al3+) [26,27]. Ciclopirox has antifungal,
`antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities. It is admin-
`istered to the infected nails daily and this treatment regimen
`continues for ≥ 6 months. Ciclopirox persists in the nail for
`14 days after therapy is completed. Clinical response rates for
`the treatment of onychomycosis are in the range of 7 – 10%.
`Amorolfine belongs to the morpholine group of synthetic
`antifungal agents. Its mechanism of action involves the
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`159
`
`Downloaded by [National Library of Medicine] at 08:43 01 June 2016
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 7/15
`
`

`
`Recent progress on the topical therapy of onychomycosis
`
`Cl
`
`Cl
`
`O
`
`O
`
`Cl
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`Itraconazole
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N
`
`O
`
`Griseofulvin
`
`Terbinafine
`
`Figure 1. Chemical structures of itraconazole, griseofulvin and terbinafine.
`
`N
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N O
`
`H
`
`Ciclopirox
`
`Amorolfine
`
`Figure 2. Chemical structures of ciclopirox and amorolfine.
`
`the ergosterol
`in
`important steps
`two
`inhibition of
`pathway [28]. Amorolfine is fungicidal against C. albicans and
`T. mentagrophytes. It is administered once or twice weekly to
`the infected nails for 6 – 12 months and (as with ciclopirox)
`persists in the nail for 14 days after therapy is completed.
`
`5. New antifungal compounds in development
`for onychomycosis
`
`Due to the treatment limitations described in Section 3 for
`onychomycosis, it is not surprising that significant R&D
`efforts have focused on the discovery of improved therapies.
`In general, these efforts have emphasized eliminating the defi-
`ciencies of currently approved drugs, which include long
`treatment times, concurrent side effects of oral drugs and poor
`efficacy of topical agents. The new treatment modalities that
`are presently in clinical development for onychomycosis are
`listed in Table 1.
`As noted from the entries in Table 1, most of the
`approaches represent re-formulations of known antifungal
`compounds with penetration enhancers in an effort to
`
`increase penetration of the active agent into and through the
`nail plate. The only systemic drug in development is itracon-
`azole (Hyphanox™), which is being developed by Barrier
`Therapeutics as a once-daily oral formulation. With respect
`to topical treatments for onychomycosis, the use of novel
`delivery vehicles and permeation enhancers applied to exist-
`ing classes of antifungals (e.g., azoles or allyl amines) repre-
`sents the main R&D approach that has been pursued over
`the past 10 years. Very little work has been reported on
`approaches focusing on discovering antifungal compounds
`that have intrinsic nail-penetrating properties. S-291-ND is
`one such compound and involves the use of a topical
`NO-generating formulation that can be applied directly to
`the toenail. NO is a highly reactive molecule that has anti-
`microbial activity [29] and may also have intrinsic nail-pene-
`trating capabilities due to is low molecular weight. The
`other novel approach is represented by the boron-containing
`antifungal compound, AN-2690. Now in clinical trials, this
`agent was specifically designed to overcome the nail barrier
`when applied topically so that
`it can achieve high
`concentrations in the nail bed [30].
`
`160
`
`Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs (2007) 16(2)
`
`Downloaded by [National Library of Medicine] at 08:43 01 June 2016
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776
`ANACOR EX. 2113 - 8/15
`
`

`
`Alley, Baker, Beutner & Plattner
`
`Table 1. Onychomycosis treatments in clinical development.
`
`Compound
`
`Abafungin (Abasol™,
`York Pharma)
`Topical butenafine gel
`AN-2690
`
`NM-100060
`Itraconazole (Hyphanox™,
`Barrier Therapeutics)
`Organo-gel delivery of
`allylamine antifungals
`Topical NO (S-291-ND)
`Onycofitex
`Transdermal SEPA®
`
`Company
`
`York Pharma
`
`Mylan
`Anacor
`Pharmaceuticals
`NexMed/Novartis
`Barrier
`Therapeutics
`MediQuest
`Therapeutics
`ProStrakan
`Bentley Pharma
`MacroChem
`
`Stage
`
`Description
`
`Pre-registration
`(in UK)
`Phase III
`Phase II
`
`Phase II
`Phase II
`
`Phase II
`
`A topical 2-aminothiazole membrane intergity antagonist
`
`Topical formulation of ergosterol synthesis inhibitor butenafine
`Topical boron-containing antifungal with inherent nail-penetrating
`characteristics
`Topical formulation of terbinafine with penetration enhancer
`Once-daily oral formulation of itraconazole in 200-mg tablets
`
`Proprietary organo-gel delivery of naftifine or terbinafine
`
`Phase II (in UK)
`Phase I/II
`Phase I
`
`Cream formulation of NO precursors that liberate NO on the nail
`Antifungal nail lacquer formulation of clotrimazole
`Econazole in a nail lacquer with SEPA, a transdermal absorption
`enhancer
`
`6. Discovery and characterization of AN-2690
`
`6.1 Designing a compound to penetrate the nail plate
`Given the many failures and poor efficacy of topical treat-
`ments using known antifungal agents [31], a completely new
`approach was contemplated. Topical antifungal agents are
`applied to the outer surface (dorsal layer) of the nail plate and
`treatment is then dependent on the passive diffusion of the
`drug through this thick, keratin-rich, lipid-containing barrier.
`Several reviews on onychomycosis therapy suggest that topical
`antifungal drugs fail in clinical trials because of the lack of
`penetration of the drug through the nail plate [11,32,33]. To the
`authors’ knowledge, there has been no reported chemical opti-
`mization effort to identify an antifungal agent for delivery
`through a nail plate to treat onychomycosis topically.
`Studies have shown that nail penetration is dependent on
`molecular weight, octanol:water partition coefficient and
`water solubility, with smaller, more polar, water-soluble mol-
`ecules capable of penetrating to a greater extent than larger
`lipophilic molecules [15,34]. In addition to keratin, the nail
`plate contains lipids but (unlike the skin) these are not at such
`high concentrations; furthermore, t

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket