throbber
nal of the
`American Academy of
`
`
`
`ADERMATOLOGY
`
`May 1998 A
`
`V()l.UMIi 38 NlHVlBI{R 5
`
`PART I
`
`
`
`0 CME article %
`
`Vitiligo %
`Stephen (). Kuvacs, Ml)
`SI. Louis. Missollri
`
`° Se1f—Assessmentexamjination f
`
`
`
`INSN 0190-‘I622
`
`B“ Mosby
`
`
`
`
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR201 5-01 776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - “I/9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 1/9
`
`

`
`Journal of the
`
`American Academy of
`DERMATOLOGY
`
`Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy ofDermatology, Inc.
`
`CONTENTS
`
`May, Part 1, 1998
`
`CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
`
`Vitiligo
`Stephen 0. Kovacs, MD St. Louis, Missouri
`
`CME examination
`
`Answers to CME examination (Identification
`No. 898-104), April 1998 issue of the Journal
`of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`CLINICAL AND LABORATORY STUDIES
`
`An estimate of the annual direct cost of treating
`cutaneous melanoma
`
`Hensin Tsao, MD, PhD, Gary S. Rogers, MD, and
`Arthur J. Sober, MD Boston, Massachusetts
`
`Clinical and histologic trends of melanoma
`Timothy M. Johnson, MD, Olivia M. Dolan, MD,
`Ted A. Hamilton, MS, Melvin C. Lu, MD,
`Neil A. Swanson, MD, and Lori Lowe, MD
`Ann Arbor, Michigan
`
`Narrow band UVB (311 nm) phototherapy and
`PUVA photochemotherapy: A combination
`Piergiacomo Calzavara-Pinton, MD Brescia, Italy
`
`Contact hypersensitivity to tixocortol pivalate
`Michael E. Lutz, MD,
`Rokea A. el—Azhary, MD, PhD,
`Lawrence E. Gibson, MD, and
`Anthony F. Fransway, MD Rochester, Minnesota
`
`Mycosis fungoides in young patients: Clinical
`characteristics and outcome
`
`Jeffrey J. Crowley, MD, Anthony Nikko, MD,
`Anna Varghese, BA, Richard T. Hoppe, MD, and
`Youn H. Kim, MD Stanford, California
`
`Nfl Mosby
`
`Continued on page 7A
`
`Editor
`Richard L. Dobson, MD
`Associate Editor
`Bruce H. Thiers, MD
`Editorial Oflice
`Department of Dermatology
`Medical University of South Carolina
`171 Ashley Ave.
`Charleston, SC 29425-2215
`803-792-9155
`Assistant Editors
`Elizabeth A. Abel, MD
`Mountain Wew, Califomia
`Jeffrey D. Bernhard, MD
`Worcester, Massachusetts
`Michael E. Bigby, MD
`Boston, Massachusetts
`Jeffrey P. Callen, MD
`Louisville, Kentucky
`Clay J. Cockerell, MD
`Dallas, Texas
`Mark V. Dahl. MD
`Minneapolis, Minnesota
`Madeleine Duvic, MD
`Houston, Texas
`Mary Maloney, MD
`Hershey, Pennsylvania
`Brian Nickoloff, MD
`Ann Arbor; Michigan
`Amy S. Paller, MD
`Chicago, Illinois
`Neal S. Penneys, MD
`St. Louis, Missouri
`Stuart J. Salasche, MD
`Tucson, Arizona
`Robert A. Schwartz, MD
`Newark, New Jersey
`Elizabeth Sherertz, MD
`Winston—Salem, North Carolina
`Alvin R. Solomon, MD
`Atlanta, Georgia
`Kenneth J. Tomecki, MD
`Cleveland, Ohio
`
`Founding Editor
`J. Graham Smith, Jr., MD
`Mobile, Alabama
`Vol. 38, No. 5, Part 1, May 1998, the Journal of the
`American Academy of Dermatology (ISSN 0190-9622) is
`published monthly (six issues per volume, two volumes
`per year) by Mosby, Inc., 11830 Westline Industrial Dr.,
`St. Louis, MO 63146-3318. Periodicals postage paid at St.
`Louis, Missouri,
`and additional mailing offices.
`Postmaster: Send address changes to Journal of the
`American Academy of Dermatology, Mosby, Inc., 11830
`Westline Industrial Dr., St. Louis. MO 63146-3318.
`Annual subscription rates: $155.00 for individuals,
`$268.00 for institutions. Subscription prices effective
`through Sept. 30, 1998. Printed in the U.S.A. Copyright ©
`1998 by the American Academy of Dermatology, lnc.,
`PO. Box 4014, Schaumburg, IL 60168-4014.
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR201 5-01 776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 2/9
`
`5A
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 2/9
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`continued
`
`Effect of onychomycosis on quality of life
`Lynn A. Drake, MD, Richard K. Scher, MD, Edgar B. Smith, MD,
`Gerald A. Faich, MD, MPH, Shondra L. Smith, MD, Joseph J. Hong, MD, and
`Matthew J. Stiller, MD Boston, Massachusetts; New York, New York;
`Galveston, Texas; and Narbelh, Pennsylvania
`
`THERAPY
`
`Once-daily tazarotene gel versus twice-daily fluocinonide cream in the
`treatment of plaque psoriasis
`Mark Lebwohl, MD, Ernest Ast, MD, Jeffrey P. Callen, MD,
`Stanley 1. Cullen, MD, Steven R. Hong, MD, Carol L. Kulp—Shorten, MD,
`Nicholas J. Lowe, MD, Tania J. Phillips, MD, Theodore Rosen, MD,
`David I. Wolf, MD, Janine M. Quell, BS, John Sefton, PhD, John C. Lue, MS,
`John R. Gibson, MD, and Roshantha A. S. Chandraratna, PhD
`New York and Great Neck, New York; Louisville, Kentucky; Gainesville, Florida;
`Boulder, Colorado; Boston, Massachusetts; Houston, Texas; and
`Santa Monica, Wsta, and Irvine, California
`
`Intrauterine epidermal necrosis: Report of three cases
`Ramon Ruiz-Maldonado, MD, Carola Duran-McKinster, MD,
`Daniel Carrasco—Daza, MD, Lourdes Tamayo—Sz’1nchez, MD, and
`Maria de la Luz Orozco—Covarrubias, MD Mexico City, Mexico
`
`CLINICAL REVIEWS
`
`Ocular melanomas and melanocytic lesions of the eye
`Jennifer M. Grin, MD, Jane M. Grant—Kels, MD, Caron M. Grin, MD,
`Adrienne Berke, MD, and Barry D. Kels, MD Farmington, Connecticut
`
`Advances in melanoma therapy
`Timothy M. Johnson, MD, Alan M. Yahanda, MD, Alfred E. Chang, MD,
`Darrell J. Fader, MD, and Vernon K. Sondak, MD Ann Arbor: Michigan
`
`CURRENT ISSUES
`
`The multidisciplinary melanoma clinic: A cost outcomes analysis of
`specialty care
`Darrell J. Fader, MD, Christopher G. Wise, PhD, MHA, Daniel P. Normolle, PhD,
`and Timothy M. Johnson, MD Ann Arbor, Michigan
`
`What promotes skin self-examination?
`June K. Robinson, MD, Darrell S. Rigel, MD, and Rex A. Amonette, MD
`Chicago, Illinois, New York, New York, and Memphis, Tennessee
`
`PEARLS OF WISDOM
`
`Surgical Pearl: The “unsuture” technique for skin grafts
`Ida Orengo, MD, Min—Wci Christine Lee, MD, MPH Houston, Texas
`
`Statements and opinions expressed in the articles and communications herein are those of the z1uthor(s) and notneccssatily those of the Editor(s), publisher, or Academy,
`and the Editor(s), publisher, and Academy disclaim any responsibility or liability for such material. Neither the Editor(s), publisher, nor the Academy guarantees, war-
`rants, or endorses any product or service advertised in this publication. nor do they guarantee any claim made by the manufacturer of such product or service.
`
`May, Part 1, 1998 7A
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`CFAD V. Anacor, IPRZO15-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 — 3/9
`
`Continued on page 9A
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 3/9
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`continued
`
`Iotaderma #52
`
`Jeffrey D. Bernhard, MD Worcester, Massachusetts
`
`BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Worsening of lichen myxedematosus during interferon alfa-2a therapy for
`chronic active hepatitis C
`Franco Rongioletti, MD, and Alfredo Rebora, MD Genoa, Italy
`
`Herpes zoster after varicella immunization
`Marilyn G. Liang, MD, Karen A. Heidelberg, MD, Robert M. Jacobson, MD,
`and Marian T. MCEvoy, MB, MRCPI Rochester, Minnesota
`
`Lasting immunity to varicella in doctors study (L.I.V.l.D. Study)
`Barry A. Solomon, MD, Athena G. Kaporis, MD, Alan T. Glass, MD,
`Steven 1. Simon, MD, and Hilary E. Baldwin, MD
`Brooklyn and Long Beach, New York
`
`Severe neutropenia associated with oral terbinafine therapy
`Aditya K. Gupta, MD, FRCPC, Gamini S. Soori, MD, James Q_. Del Rosso, DO,
`Paul B. Bartos, MD, and Neil H. Shear, MD, FRCPC Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
`Omaha, Nebraska; Las Vegas, Nevada; and Canton, Ohio
`
`Multiple basal cell carcinomas of the limb after adjuvant treatment of
`melanoma with isolated limb perfusion
`Philina M. Lamb, BS, Gregg M. Menaker, MD, and Ronald L. Moy, MD
`Los Angeles, California
`
`Spontaneous clearing of psoriasis after stroke
`Alexander J. Stratigos, MD, Alexander K. Katoulis, MD, and
`Nicholas G. Stavrianeas, MD Boston, Massachusetts, and Athens, Greece
`
`Lichen planus associated with Becker’s nevus
`Patrick Terheyden, MD, Barbara Hornschuh, MD, Susanne Karl, MD,
`Jiirgen C. Becker, MD, and Eva-B. Brocker, MD Wiirzbitrg, Germany
`
`Chevron nail
`
`Martin N. Zaiac, MD, Brad P. Glick, DO, MPH, PA, and Nardo Zaias, MD
`Miami Beach and Margate, Florida
`
`MEETING REPORT
`
`Executive summary of the national “Sun Safety: Protecting Our Future”
`Conference: American Academy of Dermatology and Centers for Disease
`Control and Prevention, New York, New York, May 1 and 2, 1997
`June K. Robinson, MD, Rex Amonetle, MD, Stephen W. Wyatt, DMD,
`Barbara A. Bewerse, MN, MPH, Wilma F. Bergfeld, MD, and
`Patricia K. Farris, MD
`
`Continued on page IIA
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`May, Part I, 1998 9A
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 4/9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 4/9
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`continued
`
`CORRESPONDENCE
`
`Penile lentiginosis
`Athena Kaporis, MD, and Yelva Lynfield, MD Brooklyn, New York
`
`Reply
`MAJ Joseph C. English III, MC, USAR, CPT
`Richard A. Laws, MC, USAR, CPT George C. Keough, MC, USAR, CPT
`Joseph L. Wilde, MC, USAR, LTC John P. Foley, MC, USA, and
`LTC Dirk M. Elston, MD, USA Fort Sam Houston, Texas
`
`Hydroxyurea-induced dermopathy: A unique lichenoid eruption complicating
`long-term therapy with hydroxyurea
`Brian Kirby, MB, MRCPI, and Sarah Rogers, MSC, FRCP, FRCPI
`Lancashire, England, and Dublin, Ireland
`
`Reply
`Mark R. Pittelkow, MD, and Lawrence E. Gibson, MD Rochester: Minnesota
`
`Melanoma and levodopa
`Frans Rampen, MD, Oss, The Netherlands
`
`Reply
`Wolfgang Pfutzner, MD, and Bernhard Pryzbilla, MD Munchen, Germany
`
`Antimicrobial agents for the dermatologist. I. B-Lactam antibiotics and
`related compounds
`Stuart L. Shear, MD Los Angeles, California
`
`Cutaneous nodular reaction to oral mercury
`Jeffrey Suchard, MD, Kevin Wallace, MD, Kimberlie Graeme, MD,
`Frank LoVecchio, DO, Delilah Stephens, MD, Laura Harrington-Zautra, MD,
`and Steven Curry, MD Phoenix, Arizona
`
`Phenytoin-like hypersensitivity associated with lamotrigine
`Patrick Tugendhaft, MD, and Thierry Simonart, MD Brussels, Belgium
`
`Immunohistochemical characterization of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
`with practical applications for diagnosis and treatment
`COL Kathleen J. Smith, MC, USA, CAPT Padman Menon, MC, USN, and
`Henry Skelton, MD Bethesda, Maryland, and Herndon, Virginia
`
`BOOK REVIEWS
`
`Primary care dermatology. Kenneth A. Arndt, MD, Bruce U. Wintroub, MD,
`June K. Robinson, MD, and Phillip E. LeBoit, MD, editors
`Reviewed by Barry Hainer, MD Charleston, South Carolina
`
`Facial surgery: Plastic and reconstructive. Mack Cheney, editor
`Reviewed by Joel Cook, MD Charleston, South Carolina
`
`Continued on page 13A
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`May, Part 1, 1998 11A
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 5/9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 5/9
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`continued
`
`Body contouring: The new art of liposculpture. William P. Coleman III, MD,
`C. William Hanke, MD, William R. Cook, MD, and Rhoda S. Narins, MD
`Reviewed by Ronald L. Moy, MD Los Angeles, California
`
`A color guide to diagnosis and treatment. Lowell A. Goldsmith, MD,
`Gerald S. Lazarus, MD, FACP, and Michael D. Tharp, MD
`Reviewed by Lesly S. Davidson, MD Melbourne Beach, Florida
`
`SELF-ASSESSMENT
`
`Self-Assessment examination of the American Academy of Dermatology
`(Identification No. 898-205)
`
`Answers to ‘Self-Assessment examination of the American Academy of
`Dermatology
`May 1998 issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`ANNOUNCEMENTS
`
`Attention Authors
`
`Call for Patients with Inherited Diseases of the Skin
`
`National Registry for Ichthyosis and Related Disorders
`
`READER SERVICES
`
`Information for authors
`
`Information for readers
`
`Dermatology opportunities
`
`Instructions for Category I CME credit
`
`Instructions for Category I CME credit (Self-Assessment)
`
`CME examination answer sheet
`
`CME examination answer sheet (Self-Assessment)
`
`Statement of advertising in the Journal
`
`Index to advertisers
`
`20A, 21A, and 22A
`
`24A
`
`114A
`
`28A
`
`28A
`
`35A
`
`109A
`
`22A
`
`120A
`
`Complimentary subscriptions to the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology are
`available to dermatology residents, fellows, and osteopathic trainees in the United States and
`Canada as an educational service by Westwood Squibb Pharmaceuticals, a division of
`Bristol—Myers Squibb Company.
`
`journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`May, Part 1, 1998
`
`13A
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 6/9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 6/9
`
`

`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Effect of onychomycosis on quality of life
`
`Lynn A. Drake, MD,‘1 Richard K. Scher, MD,b Edgar B. Smith, MD,‘3
`Gerald A. Faich, MD, MPH,d Shondra L. Smith, MD,a Joseph J. Hong, MD,3 and
`Matthew J. Stiller, MDa Boston, Massachusetts; New York, New York; Galveston, Texas;
`
`and Narbetlz, Pennsylvania
`
`Background: Onychomycosis impairs normal nail functions, causes considerable pain,
`interferes with daily activities, and has negative psychosocial effects.
`Objective: Our purpose was to determine patients’ perception of onychomycosis on the
`quality of life.
`Methods: A total of 258 patients with confirmed onychomycosis were surveyed by tele-
`phone at three centers. Responses to a standardized quality-of-life questionnaire were ana—
`lyzed for patient demographics, physical and functional impact, psychosocial impact, and
`economic impact.
`Results: Highest positive responses were nail-trimming problems (76%), embarrassment
`(74%), pain (48%), nail pressure (40%), and discomfort wearing shoes (38%). Ability to
`pick up small objects was impaired in 41% of subjects with fingernail involvement. More
`than 58 onychomycosis—related sick days and 468 medical visits (1.8 per subject) were
`reported during a 6-month period.
`Conclusion: Onychomycosis has significant social, psychologic, health, and occupational
`effects. Relevance of quality—of-life issues to overall health, earning potential, and social
`functioning should prompt reconsideration of the value of aggressive treatment of and
`financial coverage for onychomycosis.
`(J Am Acad Dermatol l998;38:702—4.)
`
`Onychomycosis is the most common nail dis-
`ease, and the number of persons affected appears
`to be rising, especially among the elderly. In one
`year (1989 to 1990), 662,000 Medicare patients
`(older than 65 years) made nearly 1.3 million vis-
`its to physicians for the treatment of onychomyco—
`sis, resulting in a cost of more than $43 million}
`Spontaneous remission of onychomycosis after
`treatment is rare, and recurrence is common?
`
`Medications used in the past have been limited by
`the need for prolonged treatment periods and low
`
`the Cutaneous Biology
`From the Department of Dermatology,
`Research Center, and the Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine
`at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
`Boston“; the Department of Dermatology, Columbia University,
`New York“: the Department of Dermatology, University of Texas
`Medical Branch, Galvestonc:
`and Pharmaceutical Safety
`Assessments, Inc., Narbethfl
`Supported in part by an
`Pharmaceutica, Inc.
`Accepted for publication Feb. 18, 1998.
`Reprint requests: Lynn A. Drake, MD, Massachusetts General
`Hospital, Dermatology » BAR 604, 40 Blossom St., Boston, MA
`02114-2696.
`Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
`0190-9622/98/$5.00 + 0
`16/1/89600
`
`educational grant
`
`from Janssen
`
`such as
`cure rates. However, newer agents,
`terbinafine and itraconazole, have been shown to
`be safer and more effective.“ With more effective
`
`treatment options, the impact of onychomycosis
`on patients’ quality of life is worth examining.
`When nails are infected, normal tactile fume-
`
`tions may be impaired or lost, and patients may
`experience pain or discomfort. Toenail dystrophy
`may interfere with walking, standing, exercise. or
`proper shoe fit, and fingernail infection may limit
`activities such as typing or playing a musical
`instrument. Onychomycosis also has psychoses: ial
`effects related to patients’ concerns about the
`appearance of their nails: embarrassment, reduced
`self—esteem, and social withdrawal are commcnly
`
`reported}
`The first study to document the effect of ony-
`chomycosis on quality of life was by Lubeck et al.5
`in 1993. Significantly lower quality—of-life scores
`for almost all measures were found. Our pilot
`study examined quality of life in 20 patients with
`onychomycosis of an average duration of 11
`years‘) Twenty—five percent reported paresthesiflsa
`30% reported loss of fine touch, 35% reported
`
`702
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR201 5-01 776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 7/9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 7/9
`
`

`
`]o!73‘l1£tl of the American Academy of Dermatology
`Volume 38, Number 5, Part 1
`
`Drake et al.
`
`703
`
`p.-Iii, and 20% reported problems with retrieval of
`s"T;3I;tll objects. Similar proportions of patients
`described recreational problems caused by diffi-
`culty to perform or embarrassment, fear of injury,
`well as interference with social and profession-
`al relationships. This study extended these find-
`ings by investigating a larger patient population.
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`A total of 258 subjects were interviewed by ques-
`tiunnaire: 118 (46%) from Massachusetts General
`
`Hospital, 99 (38%) from Columbia University College
`oi’ Physicians and Surgeons, and 41 (16%) from the
`’t.3.:.'tiversity of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. The
`subjects were generally healthy, had a median age of
`51.5 years, and were predominantly white and male.
`T3;iirty—seven percent took prescription drugs daily,
`mostly for hypertension or for cardiac or pulmonary
`conditions. About half were employed in white collar or
`§‘:~'.‘-OfeSSlOI1Ell positions; the median household income
`was about $60,000. Seventy percent had attended col-
`lege, and 94% had some form of medical insurance.
`few differences were noted among the three centers,
`although the population from Texas included a higher
`proportion of women (49% vs 39% and 25% at the
`other two sites) and was less affluent (22% with income
`over $60,000 vs 49% and 53% at the other two sites).
`The questionnaire consisted of 57 questions divided
`into patient, physical and functional, psychosocial and
`economic domains. The questions were developed on
`the basis of the authors’ experience, the pilot study at
`Massachusetts General Hospital, and the quality-of—life
`instrument developed by Lubeck et al.5 Interviewers
`presented the questions by telephone. The high and
`complete (95%) response rate indicated favorable
`patient acceptance of the questionnaire. For perceptions
`of general health and impact of onychomycosis, sub-
`iects were asked to respond on a five-point scale (excel-
`lent to poor, and no problem to very severe problem).
`All other physical, functional, and psychosocial ques-
`tions had four possible responses: absent, mild, moder-
`ate, or severe. Quality-of—life scores were determined
`by assigning a weighted average to the responses as fol-
`lows: absent = 100, mild = 66.6, moderate = 33.3,
`severe = 0.
`
`RESULTS
`
`The mean duration of nail fungal disease in the
`study population was 9.5 years. At the time of the
`interview, 227 subjects (88%) had active nail dis-
`ease. More than half with fingernail disease and
`about 35% of those with toenail disease had had
`
`involvement of one to three nails. All 10 digits had
`been affected in 15% of subjects with fingernail
`
`and 28% of those with toenail involvement. Nearly
`40% reported an associated fungal infection on the
`soles during the past 3 years.
`Onychomycosis affected the fingernails alone
`in 23 subjects (9%), the toenails alone in 128
`(50%), and both the fingernails and toenails in 107
`(41%). The group with toenail involvement alone
`included a significantly (p < 0.05) higher propor-
`tion of men (63% vs 43%), white subjects (88% vs
`74%), and subjects employed in white collar or
`professional positions (61% vs 39%) than the
`group with fingernail involvement alone. Seventy
`percent of subjects considered their nails to be at
`least a moderate problem. Subjects with toenail
`involvement alone perceived their problem as
`more serious, with 19% categorizing it as severe or
`very severe as compared with 30% with fingernail
`involvement alone and 46% with both toenail and
`
`fingernail involvement. This difference was also
`significant (p < 0.05).
`involve-
`Of the 130 subjects with fingernail
`ment, 54 (42%) reported tingling, burning, numb-
`ness, pressure, or discomfort. These feelings were
`reported by all 235 subjects with toenail involve-
`
`ment. A total of 193 (75%) of the 258 subjects
`were embarrassed about their nails. The extent of
`
`embarrassment was described as mild by 56
`(29%), moderate by 74 (38%), and severe by 63
`(33%). Embarrassment was reported significantly
`less frequently (p < 0.05) by subjects with toenail
`involvement alone (66%) than by those with fin-
`gernail involvement alone (74%) or involvement
`of
`both
`fingernails
`and
`toenails
`(85%).
`Onychomycosis was more likely to cause embar-
`rassment for women (83%) than for men (71%).
`
`Moreover, women were more likely than men to
`feel severe embarrassment (44% vs 26%). Thirty-
`two subjects (12%) reported that their infection
`had interfered with social relationships and 38
`(15%) had avoided social situations because of
`their condition.
`
`More than 58 days of sick time were reported as
`a result of onychomycosis, and 468 medical visits
`(1.8 per subject) were made for nail—related rea-
`sons during a 6-month period. Subjects with toe-
`nail involvement sought medical care significantly
`more often than those with fingernail involvement
`(p < 0.001). A total of 249 subjects (97%) stated
`that they would be willing to pay for a nail fungus
`medication with an 80% cure rate, even if their
`insurance would not cover the cost. However,
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR201 5-01 776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 8/9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 8/9
`
`

`
`704 Drake et al.
`
`Journal of the American Academy of D€I‘11'lat010gf’
`May 1998
`
`although women were more embarrassed about
`their disease, men were more willing to pay for
`treatment. Regression analysis showed a relation
`between the willingness to pay more than $100 for
`a treatment with an 80% cure rate and male sex
`
`(1.5—fold), household income, and a greater level
`of embarrassment
`(3.7—fo1d). The number of
`
`patients willing to pay for treatment not covered
`by insurance decreased to 148 (57%) when the
`theoretic cure rate was reduced to 35%.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Our subjects all volunteered for clinical trials on
`onyehomyeosis and were therefore a self—selected
`population likely to perceive their disease as sig-
`nificant. In addition, in our study, nail disease
`severity was judged by patients without reference
`to anything external (i.e., they could say their nails
`were severely affected, then separately and subse-
`quently deny physical pain and discomfort and
`even functional and psychosocial problems). For
`these reasons, quality—of—life scores often do not
`correlate with self—reported “global” severity rat-
`ings. In other words, severity and quality of life are
`two separate and different measurements that often
`do not overlap.
`There is strong support for the physical and psy-
`chosocial value of treating non—1ife—threatening but
`
`disfiguring skin conditions. Toenail infection can
`contribute to social isolation; in the elderly, for
`
`example, the ability to walk is crucial to remaining
`active in society.73 Our results indicate that ony-
`chomycosis should be included among the cuta~
`neous disorders with social, psychologic, and
`occupational effects, as well as possibly predis-
`posing persons to more serious medical disorders.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`l. Scher RK. Onyehomycosis is more than a cosmetic pro};-
`lem. Br J Dermatol l944;130(Suppl 43):l5.
`. Piérard GE, Arrese—Estrada J, Pierard—Franchimont L.
`Treatment of onychomycosis: traditional approaches. J
`Am Acad Dermatol l993;29(Suppl):S4l—5.
`. Roberts DT. Oral therapeutic agents in fungal nail dis»
`ease. J Am Acad Dermatol l994;3l(Suppl):S78—81.
`. Arenas R, Dominguez-Cherit J, Fernandez LM. Op: 1
`randomized
`comparison
`of
`itraconazole
`versus
`terbinafine in onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol 1995;} ':
`138-43.
`
`. Lubeck DP, Patrick DL, McNulty P, et al. Quality of lire‘-
`of persons with onyehornycosis. Quality of Life
`Research l993;2:341—8.
`. Hong JJ, Stiller M.l, Menn E, et al. A pilot study to deter»
`mine the biopsychosoeial effects of onychomycosis on a
`northeastern American subpopulation [Abstract]. J 11]V’C"’/E
`Dermatol 1995;104:668.
`. Helfand AE. Onychomycosis in the aged: an administ::.:-—
`tive perspective. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1986;76:142-
`5.
`
`. Kligman AM. Psychological aspects of skin disorders in
`the elderly. Cutis 1989;43:498-501.
`
`BOUND VOLUMES AVAILABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS
`
`Bound volumes of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology are available to subscribers (only)
`for the 1998 issues from the Publisher at a cost of $112.00 for domestic, $139.10 for Canadian, and $130.00 for
`international for volume 38 (January-June) and volume 39 (July—Deeember). Shipping charges are included. Each
`bound volume contains a subject and author index and all advertising is removed. Copies are shipped within 60
`days after publication of the last issue in the volume. The binding is durable buekram with the journal name, vol
`ume number, and year stamped in gold on the spine. Payment must accompany all orders. Contact Mosby, InC~
`Periodical Subscription Services, 11830 Westline Industrial Dr., St. Louis, MO 63146-3318. USA: phone (800?
`453-4351; (314) 453-4351.
`
`Subscriptions must be in force to qualify. Bound volumes are not available in place of a regular journal subscription.
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR201 5-01 776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 9/9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2064 - 9/9

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket