throbber
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
`
`Open Access Full Text Article
`
`Dovepress
`open access to scientific and medical research
`
`R e v i e w
`
`Spotlight on tavaborole for the treatment
`of onychomycosis
`
`Sphoorthi Jinna
`Justin Finch
`Department of Dermatology,
`University of Connecticut School
`of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
`
`Correspondence: Justin Finch
`Department of Dermatology,
`University of Connecticut School of
`Medicine, 21 South Road, Farmington,
`CT 06032, USA
`Tel +1 860 679 4600
`Fax +1 860 679 4759
`email finch@uchc.edu
`
`Abstract: Onychomycosis is a fungal nail plate infection that has been increasing in preva-
`lence. A variety of oral and topical anti-fungal agents are currently available but their use is
`limited by their adverse effect profile, drug–drug interactions, and limited efficacy. Therefore,
`there is a great need for newer anti-fungal agents. Tavaborole is one of these newer agents and
`was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in July 2014 for the topical treatment
`of mild to moderate toenail onychomycosis. Tavaborole is a novel, boron-based anti-fungal
`agent with greater nail plate penetration than its predecessors, due to its smaller molecular
`weight. It has proven through several Phase II and III trials that it can be a safe and effective
`topical agent for the treatment of mild to moderate toenail onychomycosis without the need
`for debridement. In this paper, we review the landscape of topical and systemic treatment
`of onychomycosis, with particular attention to the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of
`topical tavaborole.
`Keywords: tavaborole, boron-based antifungals, oxaboroles, onychomycosis
`
`Introduction
`Onychomycosis is a fungal nail plate infection affecting between 10% and 30% of
`the global population1,2 and accounting for approximately one-half of all nail disor-
`ders seen in dermatology practices.3 Prevalence of the disease continues to increase,
`partly due to the growing elderly population,4 the increasing number of patients with
`diabetes mellitus,5,6 and the increase in peripheral vascular disease.7 If left untreated,
`it can spread to adjacent nails, to additional body sites, or to other individuals.8 Goals
`of onychomycosis therapy therefore include mycological cure (negative potassium
`hydroxide [KOH] or fungal culture) and a normal appearing nail. Currently, a variety
`of anti-fungal options, both topical and oral, are available.9 While oral medications
`are the gold standard of onychomycosis therapy, the side effect profile and drug–drug
`interactions are limiting to many patients.10 Therefore, effective topical remedies are
`heavily sought after by both patients and providers. Successful treatment, however,
`is often hindered by the topical agents’ limited ability to penetrate the nail.11 This can
`lead to a high incidence of relapse, often making onychomycosis a chronic condition
`for patients.12,13
`Current antifungal agents
`Before discussing the novel mechanism of the new class of boron-containing anti-
`fungals ushered in by tavaborole, it is worthwhile to review the existing antifungal
`landscape. Currently, there are several approved classes of antifungal drugs for the
`treatment of onychomycosis: allylamines, azoles, morpholines, and hydroxypyridi-
`nones, most of which target fungal cell membrane synthesis.14
`
`submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
`Dovepress
`http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S81944
`
`6185
`Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015:9 6185–6190
`© 2015 Jinna and Finch. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0)
`License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further
`permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on
`how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2060 - 1/6
`
`

`
`Jinna and Finch
`
`Dovepress
`
`Drugs of the allylamine class, including naftifine,
`butenafine, and terbinafine, inhibit squalene epoxidase, thereby
`blocking fungal ergosterol synthesis.15 Ergosterol is a sterol
`integral to fungal cell membrane synthesis, and without it many
`fungi cannot survive. Terbinafine (250 mg) taken orally for 12
`weeks is considered the current gold standard in onychomycosis
`therapy.16–18 Terbinafine’s superior efficacy may be due to the
`fact that it is strongly lipophilic and therefore distributes well
`into skin, fat, and nails.16 While this therapy is the gold stan-
`dard, mycologic cure rates with terbinafine are 73%–81%, with
`complete cute rates merely 23%–38%, indicating that current
`gold standards are still far from ideal. Also, periodic monitoring
`of liver function tests is recommended with terbinafine due to
`potential hepatotoxicity associated with this drug.16
`The azole drug class also inhibits ergosterol biosynthesis,
`but does so via inhibition of lanosterol 14α-demethylase.15
`This class can be subdivided into imidazoles and triazoles
`based on the drugs’ molecular structures.15 Currently,
`US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved oral
`itraconazole19 and off-label oral fluconazole20 are used in
`the treatment of onychomycosis and are considered second
`and third line therapies, respectively. In June 2014, topical
`efinaconazole 10% nail solution was FDA approved for
`onychomycosis.21 Phase III trials indicated 15%–18%
`complete cure and 53%–56% mycologic cure with this
`topical regimen. This efinaconazole formulation represents
`an important advance in topical treatment of onychomycosis,
`but detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this paper.
`The morpholine drug class includes topical amorolfine,
`which is approved in Europe but not in the US.22 Amorolfine
`works to deplete ergosterol as well, through inhibition of
`D14 reductase and D7–D8 isomerase.23 Ciclopirox is a
`hydroxypyridinone drug with a poorly understood mecha-
`nism of action that may involve iron chelation or oxidative
`damage.24,25
`Finally, griseofulvin deserves mention as it was the
`first oral antifungal agent specifically approved for ony-
`chomycosis treatment in the US.26 A meta-analysis of three
`randomized trials using griseofulvin found a mycologic cure
`rate of approximately 60% with complete cure rates as low
`as 2%. Compared with the other systemic agents, griseofulvin
`has little role in current anti-fungal therapy given these low
`efficacy rates, high relapse rates, long treatment durations
`(12–18 months), and drug interactions as a potent CYP3A4
`inhibitor.26
`
`Topical antifungal therapy
`There has been a recent emergence of topical anti-fungal
`agents with improved nail permeation and efficacy.
`
`6186
`
`submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
`Dovepress
`
`Drug penetration through the nail plate is mostly predicted by
`low molecular weight in addition to the hydrophilic proper-
`ties of the drug.27 Varying the molecular targets of these new
`therapies can be invaluable as well, especially considering the
`high proportion of incomplete onychomycosis treatment lead-
`ing to antifungal resistance.28 Until June 2014, ciclopirox 8%
`nail lacquer was the only topical agent approved for onycho-
`mycosis in North America.29,30 Two double-blind, vehicle-
`controlled studies demonstrated complete cure (defined as
`clear nail and negative mycology by negative KOH and
`culture) in 5.5% and 8.5% of participants using ciclopirox
`solution. Negative mycology was noted in 29% and 36% of
`individuals.31
`
`Tavaborole
`The newest class of topical antifungal therapies is a novel drug
`class of boron-containing compounds called oxaboroles.32
`Boron has uniquely been found to bind functional groups at
`target sites of particular enzymes, thereby rendering them
`inaccessible and impairing their function. The first molecule
`in this class of drugs to achieve FDA approval in July 2014
`is tavaborole (formerly AN2690), which is formulated as a
`5% topical solution for the treatment of toenail onychomy-
`cosis (Table 1).33
`
`Nail penetration
`Tavaborole’s low molecular weight (approximately half of
`most antifungals, such as terbinafine and efinaconazole) per-
`mits optimal nail plate penetration, superior to that of existing
`topical antifungal medications.34 In a head-to-head study with
`ciclopirox, the amount of tavaborole 5% solution penetrating
`an ex vivo cadaver fingernail plate was 250-fold higher than
`ciclopirox 8% solution after 14 days of daily application
`(524.7 µg/cm2 vs 13.0 µg/cm2, respectively).32,35 In vitro
`nail penetration studies also show that tavaborole is better
`
`Table 1 Tavaborole at a glance
`Structure
`
`(cid:50)(cid:43)
`(cid:37)
`
`(cid:50)
`
`Mechanism of action
`
`(cid:41)
`5-fluoro-1,3-dihydro-1-hydroxy-2,1-
`benzoxaborole
`inhibits cytoplasmic leucyl-transfer RNA
`synthetase, interfering with fungal protein
`synthesis
`5% topical solution
`Commercial availability
`Apply daily ×48 weeks
`FDA-approved use
`Abbreviation: FDA, US Food and Drug Administration.
`
`Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015:9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2060 - 2/6
`
`

`
`Dovepress
`
`Tavaborole for onychomycosis treatment
`
`able to penetrate human nails compared with ciclopirox 8%
`and amorolfine 5% nail lacquers.35,36
`
`Mechanism of action
`Tavaborole possesses a unique mechanism of action making
`it highly specific against pathogenic fungi.37 Unlike existing
`antifungals that inhibit ergosterol synthesis (terbinafine,
`itraconazole, fluconazole, amorolfine, and efinaconazole) or
`microbial metabolism (ciclopirox), tavaborole interferes with
`protein synthesis in fungal cells by acting on cytoplasmic
`aminoacyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetases.34 Tavaborole
`specifically binds with leucyl-tRNA synthetase in the editing
`site, thus preventing the synthesis of leucine-charged tRNAs
`and ultimately suppressing fungal cell activity.34 Tavaborole
`has a greater than 1,000-fold higher affinity for fungal leucyl-
`tRNA synthetase compared with the human version.34,38,39
`Therefore, human exposure is very low, providing a wide
`margin of safety.40
`
`Antifungal activity
`Tavaborole’s unique mechanism of action is shown
`to be effective across a wide range of fungal organ-
`isms. In in vitro studies, tavaborole shows minimal
`inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 1–8 µg/mL against
`the dermatophytes Trichophyton mentagrophytes and
`Trichophyton rubrum (the primary causative agents of
`onychomycosis) and of #0.5–4 µg/mL against the dermato-
`phytes Trichophyton tonsurans (2–4 µg/mL), Epidermo-
`phyton floccosum (#0.5 µg/mL), Microsporum audouinii
`(2 µg/mL), Microsporum canis (2 µg/mL), and Microspo-
`rum gypseum (2 µg/mL).41 Specifically, both T. rubrum and
`T. mentagrophytes indicated an MIC50 of 4 µg/mL and an
`MIC90 of 8 µg/mL.41 The presence of 5% powdered keratin
`has no effect on the microbiological activity of the drug
`against T. rubrum (MIC 2 µg/mL).37,41 The drug is also active
`against the far less common nondermatophytic molds, such
`as Aspergillus fumigatus (MIC 0.25 µg/mL) and Fusarium
`solani (MIC #0.5 µg/mL), and yeast such as Candida albi-
`cans (MIC 1 µg/mL).41 Two weeks after the completion of
`28 days of treatment with tavaborole 7.5%, nail plate concen-
`trations above these MIC ranges are maintained; furthermore,
`therapeutic levels remain in the nail up to 3 months after
`treatment cessation, with drug levels corresponding to 161
`times the MIC90 for T. rubrum.30
`
`Phase ii trials
`Three Phase II clinical trials were conducted for tavaborole;
`two as open-label trials and one as a double-blind, dose-
`ranging, placebo-controlled trial.42 They all evaluated the
`
`Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015:9
`
`treatment of distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis
`(DLSO; the most common form of onychomycosis) of at least
`one great toenail with 20%–60% nail plate involvement.42
`The Phase II portion of a Phase I/II open-label study
`examined the efficacy of tavaborole 7.5% in 15 adults
`aged 18–65 years.30 Participants had mycologically (KOH)
`confirmed onychomycosis of at least one great toenail, a
`clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis in at least six additional
`toenails, $80% involvement of both great toenails, and a
`combined great toenail plate thickness of .3 mm. Participants
`applied tavaborole 7.5% to all ten toenails and surrounding
`skin once daily for 28 days. Twenty-five great toenails were
`evaluated for efficacy by fungal culture or KOH. After only
`2 weeks of treatment, 88% (22/25) of toenails treated with
`tavaborole demonstrated conversion from positive to nega-
`tive culture. After 4 weeks of treatment, 100% mycologic
`clearance was noted.30
`A second, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging
`Phase II study was performed to investigate three concen-
`trations of tavaborole compared with vehicle.30 A total of
`187 patients with KOH- and culture-confirmed DLSO of
`the great toenail and 20%–60% involvement of the target
`nail were enrolled in the study. Participants applied vehicle
`(n=63), tavaborole 2.5% (n=33), tavaborole 5% (n=31), or
`tavaborole 7.5% (n=60) daily for 3 months and then three
`times per week for the subsequent 3 months. The primary
`efficacy endpoint was negative culture and either $2 mm of
`clear nail growth or an Investigator Static Global Assessment
`(ISGA) of clear or almost clear growth at 6 months. All con-
`centrations of tavaborole demonstrated a significantly greater
`therapeutic effect compared with vehicle after 6 months
`of treatment (clearance rates: 14% for vehicle, 27% for
`2.5% tavaborole, 26% for 5% tavaborole, and 32% for 7.5%
`tavaborole).30
`Another Phase II trial was composed of 89 individuals
`with KOH- and culture-confirmed DLSO of one great toenail
`and 20%–60% involvement of the target nail.30 Cohort 1
`(n=30) was treated with tavaborole 5% daily for 6 months,
`cohort 2 (n=30) was treated with a 7.5% concentration daily
`for 6 months, and cohort 3 (n=29) was treated with a 5%
`concentration daily for 12 months. The primary efficacy
`endpoint was a negative culture and either $2 mm of clear
`nail growth or an ISGA of clear or almost clear growth at
`6 months for cohorts 1 and 2, and at 12 months for cohort 3.
`After 6 months of treatment, efficacy rates were 43% and
`53% for cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Following 12 months
`of treatment, the efficacy rate was 14% in cohort 3.30
`A final Phase II trial investigated 1% and 5% concentra-
`tions in 60 participants with mycologically confirmed DLSO
`
`submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
`Dovepress
`
`6187
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2060 - 3/6
`
`

`
`Jinna and Finch
`
`Dovepress
`
`of the great toenail and 20%–60% involvement of the target
`nail.30 One group (n=30) applied tavaborole 1% daily for
`6 months and the other group (n=30) applied tavaborole 5%
`daily for the first 30 days and then three times per week for the
`following 5 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was nega-
`tive culture and either $2 mm of clear nail growth or an ISGA
`of clear or almost clear growth at 6 months. After 6 months of
`treatment with tavaborole, 30% and 50% efficacy rates were
`achieved with 1% and 5% concentrations, respectively.30
`
`Phase iii trials
`Two duplicate, multicenter, double-blind, randomized,
`vehicle-controlled Phase III trials were conducted for
`tavaborole 5% nail solution (trial 1, n=601; trial 2, n=593).
`Adults 18 years and older with DLSO of at least one great
`toenail with 20%–60% nail plate involvement without der-
`matophytoma or lunula involvement were enrolled. Subjects
`were randomized 2:1 to applying either tavaborole 5%
`solution or vehicle once daily for 48 weeks. The primary
`efficacy endpoint was complete cure of the target great toe-
`nail defined as negative mycology (KOH and culture) and
`completely clear nail at week 52. The complete cure rates
`for tavaborole were 6.5% and 9.1% (P=0.001 and ,0.0001,
`respectively), statistically superior to vehicle. Mycological
`cure rates were also significantly higher at 31.1% and 35.9%
`(P,0.001). Overall, once daily application of tavaborole 5%
`is significantly more effective than vehicle in the treatment
`of toenail onychomycosis.43 Comparison to other antifun-
`gal agents makes it an attractive therapeutic option as well
`(Table 2).26,44
`
`Safety
`Boron-containing compounds have been known for many
`years to exhibit high toxicity in insects, enabling their use
`as pesticides.45 But, in general, toxicity in mammals has not
`
`Table 2 Tavaborole compared to other oral and topical antifungal
`agents for the treatment of toenail onychomycosis
`
`Mycologic cure
`rate
`
`Clinical cure
`rate
`
`Complete
`cure rate
`
`Oral
`Griseofulvin
`Terbinafine
`itraconazole
`
`60%
`76%
`59% (continuous)
`63% (pulse)
`48%
`
`Fluconazole
`Topical
`Efinaconazole 10% 53%–56%
`Ciclopirox 8%
`29%–36%
`Tavaborole 5%
`30%–36%
`
`66%
`70% (continuous)
`70% (pulse)
`
`26%–28%
`
`15%–36%
`
`15%–18%
`5%–9%
`6%–10%
`
`been established. (In fact, boron itself may be an essential
`mineral in humans.46) That said, isolated reports have shown
`developmental or postnatal damage due to boron-containing
`compounds in rodents.47,48 Tavaborole, however, appears to
`have an excellent safety profile.
`In preclinical safety studies, a concentration of 10 µM
`of tavaborole did not inhibit the cytochrome P450 isoforms
`CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or CYP3A4.30
`Plasma levels of tavaborole were below the limits of quan-
`titation after topical application of 0.25 mL of 7.5% solu-
`tion of tavaborole once daily for 28 days to the toenails
`of 15 subjects with onychomycosis.30 Another study of
`24 subjects found that only a small fraction of the topically
`applied dose of tavaborole is absorbed systemically and that
`the drug does not accumulate after repeated application.37
`Therefore, the risk for drug interactions with tavaborole is
`low.30 Further studies are needed, however, to confirm this
`finding in long-term use. In all, Phase II and III studies, none of
`the serious adverse events that occurred were deemed related
`to tavaborole, whereas the frequency of treatment-related
`adverse events were comparable to vehicle. The most com-
`mon adverse events were application site exfoliation (2.7% vs
`0.3% in the vehicle group), application site erythema (1.6%
`vs 0%), and dermatitis (1.3% vs 0%).30 They were generally
`mild to moderate and transient. Treatment discontinuation
`rates were low (2.5% and 0.8% in the two Phase III trials).37
`The carcinogenic potential of tavaborole was investigated
`in a traditional 2-year carcinogenicity study in mice and rats.43
`In mice, tavaborole was applied topically at concentrations of
`0%, 5% (clinically relevant concentration), 10%, and 15%.
`It was also administered orally to the rat at 0, 12.5, 25, and
`50 mg/kg/day. There were no tavaborole-related neoplastic
`findings in either species. This study provides evidence that
`tavaborole is not carcinogenic in rodents and is therefore suit-
`able for long-term use in humans.49 In a broader study, genetic
`toxicology studies were completed with four benzoxaboroles
`and one boronic acid ester and none of them demonstrated
`genetic toxicology liabilities, thus supporting the favorable
`safety profiles of tavaborole.50
`
`Conclusion
`Onychomycosis is a fungal infection that is steadily growing
`in prevalence and is in desperate need for highly effective
`and safe treatment options. Oral agents, while effective,
`come with a significant side effect profile and concern about
`drug–drug interactions. Therefore, good topical agents that
`can penetrate the nail plate while being safe and effective
`are paramount. Topical agents have historically had limited
`
`6188
`
`submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
`Dovepress
`
`Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015:9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2060 - 4/6
`
`

`
`Dovepress
`
`Tavaborole for onychomycosis treatment
`
`efficacy given the low penetration through the nail plate.
`This leads to frustration, noncompliance, and recurrence in
`onychomycosis patients.
`The emergence of a new class of boron-containing drugs
`is exciting. The boron-containing molecule tavaborole offers
`a unique mechanism of action among antifungal agents,
`inhibiting leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Other boron-containing
`drugs under development for dermatologic disease inhibit
`phosphodiesterase-4, with potential applications for psoriasis
`and atopic dermatitis.33
`Tavaborole has been shown to effectively treat mild to
`moderate onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes without
`the need for debridement. It effectively penetrates the nail
`plate given its significantly lower molecular weight compared
`to other agents. While its mycologic cure rate (30%–36%)
`is lower than oral antifungal agents (50%–76%), it offers
`an important alternative to available topical antifungal
`therapies.
`Long-term studies need to be performed to assess both the
`full potential of the drug by providing more time for healthy
`regrowth of the nail and to assess recurrence rates. Head-to-
`head comparison studies of the efficacy of tavaborole vs efi-
`naconazole and ciclopirox for the treatment of onychomycosis
`would be of value. Given tavaborole’s unique mechanism of
`action, studies evaluating its use in combination with systemic
`antifungal therapy – for example, in preventing recurrence
`after systemic treatment – would be of interest as well.
`
`Disclosure
`The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
`
`References
`
`1. Ghannoum MA, Hajjeh RA, Scher R, et al. A large-scale North American
`study of fungal isolates from nails: the frequency of onychomycosis,
`fungal distribution, and antifungal susceptibility patterns. J Am Acad
`Dermatol. 2000;43:641–648.
`2. Di Chiacchio N, Suarez MV, Madeira CL, Loureiro WR. An obser-
`vational and descriptive study of the epidemiology of and therapeutic
`approach to onychomycosis in dermatology offices in Brazil. An Bras
`Dermatol. 2013;88(Suppl 1):3–11.
`3. Scher RK, Coppa LM. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of
`onychomycosis. Hosp Med. 1998;34:11–20.
`4. Baran R. The nail in the elderly. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29(1):54–60.
`5. Gupta AK, Konnikov N, MacDonald P, et al. Prevalence and epidemiol-
`ogy of toenail onychomycosis in diabetic subjects: a multicentre survey.
`Br J Dermatol. 1998;139(4):665–671.
`6. Gupta AK, Humke S. The prevalence and management of onychomycosis
`in diabetic patients. Eur J Dermatol. 2000;10(5):379–384.
`7. Gupta AK, Gupta MA, Summerbell RC, et al. The epidemiology of
`onychomycosis: possible role of smoking and peripheral arterial disease.
`J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14(6):466–469.
`8. Vander Straten MR, Hossain MA, Ghannoum MA. Cutaneous infections
`dermatophytosis, onychomycosis, and tinea versicolor. Infect Dis Clin
`North Am. 2003;17:87–112.
`
` 9. Gupta AK, Simpson FC. New therapeutic options for onychomycosis.
`Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13(8):1131–1142.
` 10. Gupta AK, Ryder JE, Skinner AR. Treatment of onychomycosis: pros
`and cons of antifungal agents. J Cutan Med Surg. 2004;8:25–30.
` 11. Murdan S. Drug delivery to the nail following topical application. Int
`J Pharm. 2002;236:1–26.
` 12. Piraccini BM, Sisti A, Tosti A. Long-term follow-up of toenail onycho-
`mycosis caused by dermatophytes after successful treatment with sys-
`temic antifungal agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(3):411–414.
` 13. Scher RK, Baran R. Onychomycosis in clinical practice: factors con-
`tributing to recurrence. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149(Suppl 65):5–9.
` 14. Welsh O, Vera-Cabrera L, Welsh E. Onychomycosis. Clin Dermatol.
`2010;28:151–159.
` 15. Gupta AK, Sauder DN, Shear NH. Antifungal agents: an overview.
`Part II. J Am Acad Dematol. 1994;30:911–933.
` 16. Lamisil (terbinafine hydrochloride) Tablets [Prescribing Information
`2013]. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; East Hanover, NJ.
` 17. Gupta AK, Paquet M, Simpson F, et al. Terbinafine in the treatment of
`dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis: a meta-analysis of efficacy for
`continuous and intermittent regimens. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.
`2013;27:267–272.
` 18. Sigurgeirsson B, Billstein S, Rantanen T, et al. L. I. O. N. Study: efficacy
`and tolerability of continuous terbinafine (Lamisil) compared to inter-
`mittent itraconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Lamisil
`vs itraconazole in onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141(Suppl 56):
`5–14.
` 19. Sporanox (Itraconazole) Capsules. Drugs@FDA: FDA Approved Drug
`Products. 2012.
` 20. Gupta AK, Drummond-Main C, Paquet M. Evidence-based optimal
`fluconazole dosing regimen for onychomycosis treatment. J Dermatol
`Treat. 2013;24:75–80.
` 21. Gupta AK, Simpson FC. New pharmacotherapy for the treatment of onycho-
`mycosis: an update. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(2):227–236.
` 22. Baran R, Feuilhade M, Combernale P, et al. A randomized trial of
`amorolfine 5% solution nail lacquer combined with oral terbinafine com-
`pared with terbinafine alone in the treatment of dermatophytic toenail
`onychomycoses affecting the matrix region. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:
`1177–1183.
` 23. Polak A. Preclinical data and mode of action of amorolfine. Dermatol-
`ogy. 1992;184(Suppl 1):3–7.
` 24. Lee REB, Liu TT, Barker KS, et al. Genome-wide expression profiling
`of the response to ciclopirox olamine in Candida albicans. J Antimicrob
`Chemother. 2005;55:655–662.
` 25. Belenky P, Camacho D, Collins JJ. Fungicidal drugs induce a common
`oxidative-damage cellular death pathway. Cell Rep. 2013;3:350–358.
` 26. Finch JJ, Warshaw EM. Toenail onychomycosis: current and future
`treatment options. Dermatol Ther. 2007;20(1):31–46.
` 27. Kobayashi Y, Komatsu T, Sumi M, et al. In vitro permeation of several drugs
`through the human nail plate: relationship between physicochemical proper-
`ties and nail permeability of drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;21:471–477.
` 28. Balkis MM, Leidich SD, Mukherjee PK, Ghannoum MA. Mechanisms
`of fungal resistance: an overview. Drugs. 2002;62:1025–1040.
` 29. Del Rosso JQ. The role of topical antifungal therapy for onychomycosis
`and the emergence of newer agents. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2014;
`7(7):10–18.
` 30. Gupta AK, Daigle D, Abramovits W. Tavaborole 5% solution for
`onychomycosis. Skinmed. 2015;13(1):55–58.
` 31. Penlac Nail Lacquer (Ciclopirox) Topical Solution PI. Dermik Labo-
`ratories, A Division of Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc; Berwyn, PA.
` 32. Elewski BE, Tosti A. Tavaborole for the treatment of onychomycosis.
`Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(10):1439–1448.
` 33. Anacor Pharmaceuticals Inc. FDA approves Anacor Pharmaceuticals’
`KERYDINTM (tavaborole) topical solution, 5% for the treatment of
`onychomycosis of the toenails [Internet]. 2014.
` 34. Rock FL, Mao W, Yaremchuk A, et al. An antifungal agent inhibits an
`aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by trapping tRNA in the editing site. Science.
`2007;316(5832):1759–1761.
`
`Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015:9
`
`submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
`Dovepress
`
`6189
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2060 - 5/6
`
`

`
`Jinna and Finch
`
`Dovepress
`
` 35. Hui X, Baker SJ, Wester RC, et al. In vitro penetration of a novel oxa-
`borole antifungal (AN2690) into the human nail plate. J Pharm Sci. 2007;
`96(10):2622–2631.
` 36. Baker SJ, Sanders V, Hold KM, et al. In vitro nail penetration profile
`of AN2690, a novel broad-spectrum antifungal agent in development
`for the topical treatment of onychomycosis. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96(10):
`2622–2631.
` 37. Markham A. Tavaborole: first global approval. Drugs. 2014;74(13):
`1555–1558.
` 38. Barak O, Loo DS. AN-2690, a novel antifungal for the topical treatment
`of onychomycosis. Curr Opin Invest Drugs. 2007;8(8):662–668.
` 39. Alley MR, Baker SJ, Beutner KR, Plattner J. Recent progress on the topi-
`cal therapy of onychomycosis. Expert Opin Invest Drugs. 2007;16(2):
`157–167.
` 40. Dosik J, Lastella P, Yavel R, et al. The pharmacokinetics of AN2690
`after topical application in patients with onychomycosis. J Invest Der-
`matol. 2011;131:S47.
` 41. Sanders V, Baker SJ, Alley MRK, et al. Microbiological activity of
`AN2690, A new antifungal agent in development for the topical treat-
`ment of onychomycosis. Poster session presented at: the 64th Annual
`Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March; 2006; San
`Francisco, CA.
` 42. Gupta AK, Simpson FC. Investigational drugs for onychomycosis.
`Expert Opin Invest Drugs. 2014;23(1):97–106.
` 43. Elewski BE, Aly R, Baldwin SL, et al. Efficacy and safety of tavaborole
`topical solution, 5%, a novel boron-based antifungal agent, for the treat-
`ment of toenail onychomycosis: Results from 2 randomized phase-III
`studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015. pii: S0190-9622(15)01512-1.
`
` 44. Gupta AK. Systemic Antifungal Agents. Comprehensive Dermatologic
`Drug Therapy. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2013:98–120.
` 45. Soriano-Ursúa MA, Das BC, Trujillo-Ferrara JG. Boron-containing com-
`pounds: chemico-biological properties and expanding medicinal poten-
`tial in prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2014;
`24(5):485–500.
` 46. Mastromatteo E, Sullivan F. Summary: international symposium on the
`health effects of boron and its compounds. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;
`102(Suppl 7):139–141.
` 47. Liu JY, Huang Y, Menting R, et al. A boron dipyrromethene-phtalocyanine
`pentad as an artificial photosynthetic model. Chem Commun. 2013;49:
`2998–3000.
` 48. Heindel JJ, Price CJ, Schwetz BA. The developmental toxicity of boric
`acid in mice, rats, and rabbits. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102:
`107–112.
` 49. Ciaravino V, Coronado D, Lanphear C, Shaikh I, Ruddock W, Chanda S.
`Tavaborole, a novel boron-containing small molecule for the topical
`treatment of onychomycosis, is noncarcinogenic in 2-year carcinogenic-
`ity studies. Int J Toxicol. 2014;33(5):419–427.
` 50. Del Rosso JQ, Plattner JJ. From the test tube to the treatment room.
`J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2014;7(2):13–21.
`
`Drug Design, Development and Therapy
`Publish your work in this journal
`Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-
`reviewed open-access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design
`and development through to clinical applications. Clinical outcomes,
`patient safety, and programs for the development and effective, safe,
`and sustained use of medicines are a feature of the journal, which
`
`Dovepress
`
`has also been accepted for indexing on PubMed Central. The manu-
`script management system is completely online and includes a very
`quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit
`http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from
`published authors.
`
`Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/drug-design-development-and-therapy-journal
`
`6190
`
`submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com
`Dovepress
`
`Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015:9
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2060 - 6/6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket