throbber
CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 1/10
`
`

`
`Journal of the
`American Academy of
`DERMATOLOGY
`
`Copyright © I996 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
`
`L D,,,,,,,,,, MD
`ssociate Editor
`bilice H. Thiers, MD
`5,it0rial Office
`Departnient of Dermatology
`’-‘tlical University of South Carolina
`171 Ashley Ave.
`{“i:u‘leston, SC 294252215
`303-792-9155
`
`I
`
`‘=-gsistant Editors
`Elizabeth A. Abel, MD
`7t5""""’”"” View’ Cahfomlfl
`Jeffrey D. Bernhard, MD
`‘zbrcester, Massachusetts
`Michael E. Bigby, MD
`'..loston, Massachusetts
`Jeffrey P. Callen, MD
`-Ioitisville, Kentucky
`Clay J. Cockerell, MD
`’lullas, Texas
`Mark V. Dahl, MD
`,m.,mmp0h.s_ Mmnema
`Madeleine Duvjc’ MD
`Houston, Texas
`Mary Maloney, MD
`51m"'€."v P€"”53’1V“"l“
`Bria“ Ni°k°1°ffv
`Ann Arbor, Michigan
`Amy S. Pallet, MD
`C/zicago, Illinois
`Neal s. Penneys, MD
`5’- U’”i5v M'7“0“’i
`Smart J. Salasche, MD
`ll1(‘.YOIl, Arizona
`Rnbm A_ Schwartz, MD
`Newark, New Jersey
`g1iZ.,,beth Sherelm MD
`Wilistrm-Salem, North Carolina
`ilvln R. Solomon. MD
`Atlanta, Georgia
`Vennetii J. Tomecki, MD
`Cleveland, Ohio
`nmlnding Editor
`J. Graham Smith, Jr., MD
`Mobile, Alabama
`Vol. 35, N0. 4, October 1996, the Journal of the Ameri—
`.
`tri Academy of Dermatology (ISSN 0190-9622) is pub-
`lished monthly (six issues per volume, two volumes per
`_m by MOsby_Yw Book Inc” 11830 Wmlme mdw
`mu: D12, St. Louis. Mo 63146331s.i=en'oc11caIs postage
`; aid at St. Louis, Missouri. and additional mailing offices.
`Postmaster: Send address changes to Journal of the
`1 niericzin Academy of Dermatology, Mosby—Ycar Book,
`lJll.‘., 11830 Westline lridustrial Dr., SL Louis, MO 63146-
`7118. Annual subscription rates: $144.00 for individuals,
`$248.00 for institutions. Printed in the U.S.A. Copyright
`1996 b ‘the AmcricanAcadc1ii of Dcimatolog , nc.,
`1ao.Boxy4o14,sctmumburg,iLl:016s4o14.
`y I
`
`CONTENTS October 1996
`
`CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
`
`Herpes Simplex: Evolving concepts
`,
`-
`-
`,
`Frederick A. Pereira, MD New York, New York
`
`Answers to CME examination (Identification
`No. 896-109), October issue of the Journal of
`the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`_
`_
`CME examination
`
`CLINICAL AND LABORATORY STUDIES
`
`Localized involutional lipoatrophy: A
`clinicopathologic study of 16 patients
`PEllI'lCl(
`Dahl, MD,
`Zalla, MD, and
`R. K. Winkelmann, MD, PhD
`Rochester, Minnesota, and
`Scottsdale, Arizona
`
`_
`_
`_
`Neurocutaneous melanosis: Clinical features of
`large congenital melanocytic nevi in patients
`with manifest central nervous system
`melanosis
`.
`.
`Maria DeDaV1d, MD, Seth J. Orlow, MD, PhD,
`Nathalie Provost! MD?
`Ashfaq A. Marghoob, MD, Babar K. Rao, MD,
`Qasirn Wasti, MD, Carol L. Huang, BA,
`Alfred W. Kopf, MD, and Robert S. Bart, MD
`New York and Stony Brook, New York
`
`_
`A U.S. epidemiologic survey of superficial
`fungal diseases
`Maggi E- Kemnas MT(ASCP)a and
`B0T1i E. El6WSl<i, MD Cleveland, Ohio
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Utilization of outpatient care for psoriasis
`R0l3€1"t 5- Sl61T1, MD BOSIUVI, MdSSdCl1MS€t1S
`
`V
`B A MOSby
`
`Continued on page 7A
`5A
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 2/1 0
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 2/10
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`continued
`
`Synergistic topical photoprotection by a combination of the iron chelator
`2-furildioxime and sunscreen
`Donald L. Bissett, PhD, and James F. McBride Cincinnati, Ohio
`
`Standard and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging of glomus
`tumors of toes and fingertips
`Jean—Luc Drape, MD, llana Idy—Peretti, MD, PhD, Sophie Goettmann, MD,
`Henri Guérin—SurVille, MD, and Jacques Bittoun, MD, PhD Paris, France
`
`Value of urinary N-methylhistamine measurements in childhood
`mastocytosis
`Dirk Van Gysel, MD, Arnold P. Oranje, MD, PhD, Ida Veimeiden, MD,
`Jacqueline de Lijster dc Raadt, Paul G. H. Mulder, PhD, and Albert W. van
`Toorenenbergen, PhD Aalst, Belgium, and Rotterdam, The Netherlands
`
`A multirater validation study to assess the reliability of acne lesion
`counting
`Anne W. Lucky, MD, Beth L. Barber, PhD, Cynthia J. Ginnan, DrPH,
`Jody Williams, RN, BSN, Joan Rattemian, RN, and
`Joanne Waldstreicher, MD Cincinnati, Ohio, and Rahway, New Jersey
`
`Acute lipodermatosclerosis is associated with venous insufficiency
`Adam S. Greenberg, MD, Anthony Hasan, MD, Berta M. Montalvo, MD,
`Anne Falabella, MD, and Vincent Falanga, MD Miami, Florida
`
`THERAPY
`
`Botulinum A exotoxin for glabellar folds: A double-blind,
`placebo-controlled study with an electromyographic injection technique
`Nicholas J. Lowe, MD, Anne Maxwell, MD, and Heather Harper, BS
`Santa Monica, California, and London, United Kingdom
`
`Photopheresis therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
`Madeleine Duvic, MD, Jeane P. Hester, MD, and Noreen A. Lemak, MD
`Houston, Texas
`
`DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
`
`Nasal reconstruction with the cheek island pedicle flap
`Scott W. Fosko, MD, and Leonard M. Dzubow, MD St. Louis, Missouri, and
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
`
`Smteincnts and opinions expressed in the aiticlcs and communications herein are those of the authoiis) and not necessarily those of the Editor(s), publisher, or Academy, and the
`i.'ull[()l'(S), publisher, and Academy disclaim any responsibility or liability for such material. Neither the Editor(s), publisher, nor the Academy guarantees, warrants, or endorses
`any product or service advertised in this publication, nor do they guarantee any claim made by the manufacturer of such product or service.
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`October 1996
`
`7A
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 3/10
`
`Continued on page 9A
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 3/10
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`continued
`
`CORRECTIONS
`
`Correction to Webster GF, Knobler RL, Lublin FD, Kramer EM,
`Hochman LR (J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34:365-7)
`
`Correction to Duvic M, Lemak NA, Redman JR, Eifel PJ, Tucker SL,
`Cabanillas FF, Kurzrock R (J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34:1022-9)
`
`Correction to Desgarennes MCP, Godoy MR, Palencia AB (J Am Acad
`Dermatol 1996;35:114-6)
`
`CLINICAL REVIEWS
`
`A clinicopathologic approach to granulomatous dermatoses
`Laura Osofsky Rabinowitz, MD, and M. Tafif Zaim, MD Cleveland, Ohio
`
`Genital herpes: An integrated approach to management
`Marcus A. Conant, MD, Timothy G. Berger, MD, Thomas J. Coates, PhD,
`David J. Longo, PhD, June K. Robinson, MD, and Lynn A. Drake, MD
`San Francisco, California; Danville, Pennsylvania; Chicago, Illinois; and
`Boston, Massachusetts
`
`SPECIAL REPORT
`
`An evaluation of the accuracy of residency applicants’ curricula vitae:
`Are the claims of publications erroneous?
`Alan S. Boyd, MD, Matt Hook, MS, and Lloyd E. King, Jr., MD, PhD
`Nashville, Tennessee
`
`ACADEMY GUIDELINES
`
`Guidelines of care for scleroderma and sclerodermoid disorders
`
`AAD Guidelines/Outcomes Committee, Lynn A. Drake, chairman
`
`Guidelines of care for the use of topical glucocorticosteroids
`AAD Guidelines/Outcomes Committee, Lynn A. Drake, chairman
`
`Guidelines of care for vitiligo
`AAD Guidelines/Outcomes Committee, Lynn A. Drake, chairman
`
`PEARLS OF WISDOM
`
`Clinical Pearl: Discoid lupus erythematosus——Treatment with occlusive
`compression
`CPT Kurt L. Maggio, MC, USA, COL Michael T. Singer, DC, USA, and
`COL William D. James, MC, USA Washington, D. C.
`
`Iotaderma #33
`
`Jeffrey D. Bernhard, MD Worcester, Massachusetts
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`Continued on page ]]A
`
`October 1996
`
`9A
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 4/10
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 4/10
`
`

`
`(‘nntents Continued
`_w.
`
`BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Sweet’s syndrome induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in a
`woman with congenital neutropenia
`Marie Aleth Richard, MD, Jean Jacques Grob, MD,
`Renaud Laurans, Sylvie Hesse, MD, Philipe Brunet, MD,
`Anne Marie Stoppa, MD, Jean Jacques Bonerandi, MD, Yvon Berland, MD,
`and Dominique Maraninchi, MD Marseille, France
`
`Erythema of the proximal nailfold in HIV-infected patients
`Peter H. Itin, MD, Luzius Gilli, MD, Reto Niiesch, MD,
`Salome Courvoisier, MD, Manuel Battegay, MD, Theo Rufli, MD, and
`Paul Gasser, MD Basel, Switzerland
`
`Circle hairs are not rolled hairs
`Jeffrey B. Smith, MD, and Daniel J. Hogan, MD Tampa and
`Bay Pines, Florida
`
`Is mycosis fungoides exacerbated by fluoxetine?
`Maarten H. Vermeer, MD, and Rein Willemze, MD
`Amsterdam, The Netherlands
`
`Treatment of tinea capitis with itraconazole
`Donald L. Greer, PhD New Orleans, Louisiana
`
`Fixed food eruption
`CDR John M. Kelso, MC, USN San Diego, California
`
`Sjiigren’s syndrome associated with thymoma
`Yoshinari Matsumoto, MD, Satoko Hirai, MD, Masaru Ohashi, MD, and
`Munehisa Imaizumj, MD Nagoya, Japan
`
`Intracranial osteolytic meningioma affecting the scalp
`Maria E. lglcsias, MD, F. Javier Vzi7quez—Doval, I\/[D, Miguel A. ldoate, MD,
`Vicente Vanaclocha, MD, Fernando ldoate, MD, and Emilio Quintanilla, MD
`Pamplona, Spain
`
`Retrospective review of the use of azathioprine in severe atopic dermatitis
`John T. Lear, MRCP(UK), John S. C. English, MRCP(UK), Peter Jones, PhD,
`and Andrew G. Smith, FRCP(UK) Stoke on Trent, Staflordshire,
`United Kingdom
`
`Propolis allergy in an HIV-positive patient
`Stefania Bellegrandi, MD, Gianpiero D’Offizi, MD, Ignacio J. Ansotegui, MD,
`PhD, Rosetta Ferrara, MD, Enrico Scala, MD, and Roberto Paganelli, MD
`Rome, Italy
`
`Two patients with confluent and reticulated papillomatosis: Response to
`oral isotretinoin and 10% lactic acid lotion
`Barry A. Solomon, MD, and Teresita A. Laude, MD Brooklyn, New York
`
`Nonpigmented fixed drug eruption from pseudoephedrine
`Kristiina Alanko, MD, PhD, Lasse Kanerva, MD, PhD,
`Berit Mohell—Talo1ahti, MD, Riitta Jolanki, DTech, and
`Tuula Estlander, MD, PhD Helsinki, Finland
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`Continued on page 13A
`
`October 1996
`
`11A
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, IPRZO15-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 5/10
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 5/10
`
`

`
`Contents Contiriued
`
`_ C
`
`ORRESPONDENCE
`
`Every day is Melanoma Monday
`Stephen E. Chiarello, MD P011 Clzarlotfe, Florida
`
`Dermatoheliosis?
`Robert S. Bart, MD New York, New York
`
`More on cutaneous reactions to recombinant cytokine therapy
`Frédérique—Anne Le Gal, MD, Carle Paul, MD, Philippe Chemaly, MD, and
`Louis Dubertret, MD Paris, France
`
`Reply
`Anthony A. Gaspati, MD Rochester, New York
`
`Cold panniculitis in a neonate
`D. Ben-Amitai, MD, and A. Metzker, MD Peta/1 Tiqvah, Israel
`
`Reply
`Adelaide A. Hebert, MD Houston, Texas
`
`Dermabrasion and epithelial sheet grafting
`Seung—Kyung Hann, MD, and Yoon—Kee Park, MD Seoul, Korea
`
`Reply
`Arthur M. Kahn, MD, and Myles J. Cohen, MD Los Angeles, California
`
`READER SERVICES
`
`Information for authors
`
`Information for readers
`
`Dermatology calendar
`
`Dermatology opportunities
`
`Instructions for Category I CME credit
`
`CME examination answer sheet
`
`lndex to advertisers
`
`20A, 21A, and 22A
`
`25A
`
`65A
`
`71A
`
`26A
`
`31A
`
`76A
`
`101111131 of the American Academy of Dermatology
`
`October 1996
`
`13A
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 6/10
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 6/10
`
`

`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`A U.S. epiderniologic survey of superficial
`
`fungal diseases
`
`Maggi E. Kemna, MT (ASCP), and Boni E. Elewski, MD Cleveland, Ohio
`
`Background: Large—scale studies performed outside the United States have demonstrated that
`most cases of onychomycosis and tinea pedis are caused by dermatophytes, primarily Tri-
`chophyton mbmm. However, other studies have suggested that yeasts and nondermatophytic
`molds may play a role, particularly in onychomycosis.
`Objective: This study was undertaken to determine the epidemiology of superficial fungal
`infections in a U.S. population.
`Methods: Fungal cultures were performed on patients with clinically suspected tinea cruris,
`tinea corporis, tinea capitis, tinea pedis, and onychomycosis.
`Results: Derrnatophytes were the most commonly isolated fungi in each type of superficial
`fungal disease studied. T. rubrum was the most commonly isolated demiatophyte species, al-
`though Trichop/iyton tonsurans was more common in tinea capitis and equally common ir1
`tinea corporis/tinea cruris. In tinea pedis and onychomycosis, dermatophytes appeared in ap-
`proximately 95% and 82% of isolates, respectively. Candida albicans and nondennatophyte
`molds played only a minor role in onychomycosis; C. albicans was isolated in 7% of nail
`cultures and nonderrnatophytic molds were isolated in 11%.
`Conclusion: These results are in general agreement with other major epidemiologic studies
`performed outside the United States. Dermatophytc fungi cause most superficial fungal in-
`fections.
`
`(J Am Acad Dermatol l996;35:539-42.)
`
`Dcrmatophytes cause most superficial fungal in-
`fections, but some yeasts and nonderrnatophytic
`molds are also sometimes involved.‘ Onychomyco—
`sis and tinea pedis are two of the most common su-
`perfimlal fungal diseases. Recent discussion has fo-
`cused on the importance of nondermatophytes in
`these diseases, particularly in onychomycosis.2'4
`How‘:-ver, data from studies in Canada5 and the
`United Kingdom6 indicate that nondermatophytes
`play a small role in these infections.
`Tlizz: purpose of this study was to detennine the
`epidemiology of superficial fungal diseases includ-
`ing onychomycosis, tinea pedis, tinea cruris, tinea
`Corporis, and tinea capitis in a U.S. population.
`
`From The Center for Medical Mycology and the Department of Der-
`Inatoi.;gy, University Hospitals of Cleveland.
`Accepted for publication March 19, 1996.
`Repfinl requests: Boni E. Elewski, MD, Center for Medical Mycology,
`D€l??’~*’fment of Dennatology, University Hospitals of Cleveland,
`Cleveland, OH 44106.
`
`C0PyI1};.~.; © 1996 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
`0190-9622/96 $5.00 + 0
`16/1/73485
`
`METHODS
`
`A total of 1222 specimens (no more than one from each
`patient) were analyzed between January and December
`1994. These specimens of nail, skin, and hair came from
`clinics, private physicians, and clinical trial programs
`(initial isolate). In most instances, data were not available
`on patient demographics. Sixteen states were represented:
`Alabama, California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Louisi-
`ana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, North
`Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, and
`Wisconsin.
`
`Specimens were submitted to the laboratory in (1) Sa-
`bouraud’s dextrose agar with 0.04% cyclohexirnide, (2)
`dermatophyte test medium (DTM), or (3) a Derma—Pak
`(Microbiological Supply Co., Toddington, Bedfordshire,
`U.K.). Each specimen that arrived in a Derma—Pak was
`examined by Calcofluor (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis,
`M0.) in 5% potassium hydroxide microscopy and was
`inoculated on Sabouraud’s dextrose agar with and with-
`out ().04% cycloheximide.
`All cultures were incubated at 30° C and checked twice
`
`weekly; a minimum of 4 to 6 weeks was allotted to con-
`firm any negative cultures.
`lnitial cultures that grew fungi suspected to be Trich0-
`phyton were inoculated on Trichophyton agars #1 and #4
`
`539
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR201 5-01 776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 7/1 0
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 7/10
`
`

`
`540 Kemna and Elewski
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatolt:-gy
`October 1996
`
`Table 1. Specimens with fungal growth
`
`Suspected
`infection
`
`Specimens
`Total
`specimens with growth
`
`Onychomycosis
`Tinea pedis
`Tinea cruris/tinea corporis
`Tinea capitis
`Total
`
`50.3
`370
`736
`36.5
`38
`129
`29.5
`69
`189
`168 E 50.0
`W 561
`45.9
`
`slants and on Christianson’s urea agar slants. Baby mixed
`cereal agar7 plates were used to induce conidia. These
`subcultures were examined after 1 week of incubation at
`
`30° C. If test results were inconclusive, the hair perfora-
`tion test was performed or rice grains were added to
`identify other derrnatophyte species. Nondermatophytic
`molds were often identified by microscopic growth on
`potato dextrose agar and other media and by manipula-
`tion of the temperature and observation of their growth.
`Yeasts were grown in corn meal with Tween 80 agar, by
`means of the Dalmau technique. Growth on media con-
`taining cycloheximide and the presence of fermentation
`in carbohydrates (dextrose, maltose, sucrose, lactose, cel-
`lobiose, and trehalose) helped to identify yeasts. Occa-
`sionally, Christianson’s urea, nitrate assimilation, or car-
`bohydrate assimilation in the API 20C test (bioMerieux
`Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) was used to confirm iden-
`tification.
`
`Slide cultures were performed when necessary. Molds
`growing in culture were routinely blotted with cellophane
`tape, and the material picked up by the tape was applied
`to a slide with Calcofluor in 5% potassium hydroxide.
`Derrnatophyte conidia are produced more rapidly on me-
`dia with less dextrose; therefore dermatophyte—like iso-
`lates were planted on cereal agar and incubation was
`continued for 1 week. The development of additional
`structures during that week indicated a dermatophyte. For
`nonderrnatophytic molds, slide cultures were prepared
`with potato dextrose agar, which encourages growth of
`conidia. When no conidia were seen, tap water, corn meal,
`Czapek solution agars (Difco Co., Detroit, Mich.), and/or
`cereal agars were used for these isolates.
`All totals were tallied with the Paradox (Borland Inter-
`national, Inc., Scotts Valley, Calif.) program.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Of the 1222 specimens analyzed, 561 (45.9%)
`grew at least one fungal species (Table I). The
`pathogen recovery rate varied by disease, from
`50.3% in clinically suspected onychomycosis to
`29.5 % in suspected tinea cruris/tinea corporis. Of the
`specimens that grew fungus, derrnatophytes were
`predominant in each disease (Table 11). Overall, T.
`
`rubrum was the most common derrnatophyte. It was
`present most frequently in onychomycosis and tinea
`pedis, accounting for 76.2% and 78.9% of isolatis,
`respectively. In tinea capitis, T. ronsurans was pre-
`dominant, accounting for 88.1% of all isolates and
`90.2% of derrnatophyte isolates. In tinea cruris/tinea
`corporis, the combined frequency of isolation of T,
`rubmm and T. tonsurans was 40.6%.
`
`C. albicans was isolated in each type of infection
`but was not considered clinically relevant except in
`patients with tinea cruris/tinea corporis.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`This U.S. study confirms that the vast majority of
`superficial fungal infections are produced by der-
`matophytes. Dermatophytes caused 94.7% of cases
`of tinea pedis and were found in 81.9% of cases of
`onychomycosis. The epidemiology of onychomy-
`cosis and tinea pedis in the United States is similar
`to that reported in Canada5 (90.7% and 97.1% der-
`matophytes, respectively) and in the United King-
`dom6 (80.6% derrnatophytes in onychomycosis);
`dermatophytes are by far the most common fuiigi.
`In the U.K. study, Clayton6 found only 1% Can-
`dida species in the isolates of toenails but 58% in
`those of fingernails; however, the study included
`chronic paronychia as well as onychomycosis and
`had an unusually low rate of recovery (73% of fin-
`gernail isolates failed to grow). Of total samples in
`Clayton’s study, only 16% grew Candida.
`Yeasts have not been shown to be keratinolytic,
`and no mechanism for their primary invasion into
`nails has clearly been established. Yeasts may (Ol-
`onize glabrous skin, hair, and nails and may become
`pathogenic only in association with preexisting
`infection, trauma, loss of epidermal barrier function,
`or immunodeficiency.6=8’9 For example, Candida
`can be recovered from the mouths of 30% of healthy
`adults,” but acute pseudomembranous candidiasis is
`rarely encountered in healthy adults and, wierl
`present, may be a harbinger of diabetes mellitus,
`AIDS, or other primary or secondary immunodefi-
`ciency. To assess the clinical significance of the re—
`covery of Candida, clinical and pathologic correla-
`tion is important. We isolated Candida from 48% of
`tinea cruris/tinea corporis cultures. Without clinical
`correlation the significance is impossible to dcrf:r—
`mine. Likewise, we cultured C. albicans in 2.3% Of
`scalp isolates, but because C. albicans does not cause
`
`tinea capitis, we believe that all of the pathog”I15
`were dennatophytes. In tinea pedis, 5.3% of isolates
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR201 5-01 776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 8/1 0
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 8/10
`
`

`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`Volume 35, Number 4
`
`Kemna and Elewski 541
`
`Table ‘ll. Fungi isolated
`/_’_,__._
`
`Onychtlmycosis
`Dennatophytes
`T. rubrum
`T. mentagrophytes
`T. tonsurans
`
`Epidermophyton floccosum
`Micmsporum gypseum
`Subtotal
`( .~.7/bicans
`Nonderrnatophyte n1olds*
`Scapulariopsis brevicaulis
`Acremonium species
`.-"iS‘])eI‘gillLtS versicolor
`Fusarium solani
`
`Aspergillus terreus
`spergillus flavus
`Scyraliditzm dimidiatum
`Subtotal
`Total
`
`Tinea capitis
`l}a?;.z‘n1atophytes
`T. torzsuram
`T. rubrum
`M. cam":
`
`T. menzagrophytes
`.32’. gypseum
`Subtotal
`C. albicans
`Total
`
`Tinea cruris/tinea corpofis
`
`Deimatophytes
`T. rubmm
`T. Ioitsurans
`M. canis
`
`T. mentagrophytes
`I". vermcosum
`Subtotal
`C. albicans
`Total
`
`Tinea pedis
`Dermatophytes
`I: mbmm
`
`T. mentagrophytes
`Subtotal
`
`C albicans
`Total
`
`No. of isolates
`
`% Total growth
`
`% Dermatophytes
`
`282
`12
`7
`
`l
`_l
`
`78.9
`
`36
`
`2
`R
`
`94.7
`
`100.0
`
`We cannot determine whether these are pathogens because we have no potassium hydroxide results.
`
`grew Candida, but we cannot tell whether they were
`Pathogmic because we lack the clinical data.
`Nonrlerrnatophytic molds may be recovered as
`“C0I1taminants” from glabrous skin, hair, and nails.
`Stfingeni criteria must be met before a yeast or non—
`
`dermatophytic mold grown from a specimen is ac-
`cepted as a causative agent. English” has proposed
`that a nondermatophytic mold must grow from at
`least 5 of 20 inocula, with no dermatophyte growth,
`to be considered clinically significant. Summerbell,
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 9/10
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 9/10
`
`

`
`542 Kemna and Elewski
`
`Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
`October 5996
`
`Kane, and Kraj den5 added the presence in direct mi-
`croscopy of atypical hyphae and/or conidia to the list
`of criteria.
`
`The relations between derinatophytes and non-
`dermatophytes in onychomycosis may be similar to
`the situation in interdigital tinea pedis in which der-
`matophytosis simplex can progress to der1natophy—
`tosis complex.l2=13 According to Leyden, dermato-
`phyte infection of the toe—webs may create a hospi-
`table environment for bacteria that normally would
`not colonize the area. These bacteria can overgrow
`and mask the underlying derrnatophyte infection.
`Similarly, dennatophyte infection of the nail may
`create conditions favorable to both bacteria and
`
`saprophytic molds, which on culture often overgrow
`dermatophytes, impeding their isolation. Therefore a
`saprophytic mold growing from a patient with a
`clinical impression of onychomycosis may not be
`the original pathogen, but may represent valid
`growth. Laboratory isolation of the dermatophyte
`may have been impeded by the saprophyte in the
`same way isolation of dermatophytes can be im-
`peded by bacteria in the derrnatophytosis complex
`syndrome.12=13 This phenomenon in the nail could
`be called “onychomycosis complex.” Fungal cul-
`ture results need to be interpreted closely in correla-
`tion with the clinical situation. The clinician should
`
`when the potassium hydroxide
`be alert for
`reveals septate hyphae and only saprophytes were
`recovered in the laboratory.
`The majority of cultures received in our study
`were already planted on media plates; therefore no
`direct microscopy was done; this hampered analysis
`of the significance of the recovered nonderrnato—
`phytic molds (Table IT).
`The most likely reason that more than half the
`cultures failed to grow is that there was no fun-
`gus. Fungi cause only 50% of nail disorders,” and
`other skin conditions can mimic cutaneous fungal
`infections. Other factors that may account for the
`
`low recovery rate are antimycotic use by the pa.
`tient, variable methods of culture collection, and
`
`bacterial or saprophytic overgrowth. In Clayton’s
`study6 of onychomycosis, 66% of samples from
`toenails and 73% of samples from fingernails had
`no growth, which is somewhat less than our recov-
`ery rate.
`
`REFEREN CES
`
`1. Rippon JW. Cutaneous infections: dermatophytosis. and
`derrnatomycosis. In: Medical mycology: The pathogenic
`fungi and the pathogenic actinomycetes. 3rd ed. Philadel-
`phia: WB Saunders, 19882169-275.
`. Rosen T. Emerging role of yeasts and nondennatophytic
`molds in fungal nail infections.
`Int J Dermatol E994;
`33:292-9.
`. Ramani R, Srinivas CR, Ramani A, et al. Molds in
`onychomycosis. lntJ Dermatol l993;32:877-8.
`. Willemsen M. Changing patterns in superficial infex :ion-
`szfocus on onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol 1993;
`2(suppl l):S6—Sl 1.
`. Summerbell RC, Kane J, Krajden S. Onychomycosis, tinea
`pedis and tinea manuum caused by non—derrnatophync fil-
`amentous fungi. Mycoses l989;32:609-l9.
`. Clayton YM. Clinical and mycological diagnostic aspects
`of onychomycoses and derrnatomycoses. Clin Exp Der-
`matol l992;l7(suppl l):37-40.
`. Padhye AA, Sekhon AS, Carmichael .lW. Ascocan“ pro-
`duction by nannizzia and aithroderma on keratinous and
`non-keratinous media. Sabouraudia l973;ll:lO9—l4’
`. Elewski BE. Cutaneous fungal infections. New York:
`lgaku—Shoin, 1992.
`In:
`. Rippon JW. Candidiasis and the pathogenic yeasts.
`Rippon JW, Wonsiewicz M. editors. Medical mycclogy:
`the pathogenic fungi and the pathogenic actinomycetes. 3rd
`ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, l988:532-81.
`. Cohen R, Ross FJ, Delgado E, et al. Fungal flora of the
`normal human small and large intestine. N Engl J Med
`1969;280:638-41.
`. English MP. Nails and fungi. Br J Dermatol 1976;94:697-
`701.
`
`. Leyden JJ, Kligman AM. I nterdigital athlete’ s foot: the in—
`teraction of dermatophytes and resident bacteria. Arch
`Dermatol l 978;l l4:l466—72.
`. Leyden JJ. Progression of interdigital infections fror:~ sirn-
`plex to complex. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993 ;28:S7—ll.
`. Cohen JL, Scher RK, Pappert AS. The nail and fung as in-
`fections. In: Elewski BE, editor. Cutaneous fungal infeC'
`tions. New York: Igaku—Shoin, l992:l06-23.
`
`CFAD V. Anacor, |PR20’|5-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - “IO/“IO
`
`CFAD v. Anacor, IPR2015-01776 ANACOR EX. 2039 - 10/10

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket