throbber
NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 4
`
`NEXIUM
`(esomeprazole magnesium)
`DELAYED-RELEASE CAPSULES
`
`Rx only
`
`DESCRIPTION
`The active ingredient in NEXIUM (esomeprazole magnesium) Delayed-Release Capsules is bis(5-
`methoxy-2-[(S)-[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)methyl]sulfinyl]-1H-benzimidazole-1-yl)
`magnesium trihydrate, a compound that inhibits gastric acid secretion. Esomeprazole is the S-isomer of
`omeprazole, which is a mixture of the S- and R- isomers. Its empirical formula is (C17H18N3O3S)2Mg x
`3 H2O with molecular weight of 767.2 as a trihydrate and 713.1 on an anhydrous basis. The structural
`formula is:
`
`H3C
`
`OCH3
`
`N
`
`CH3
`
`CH2
`
`N
`
`O
`S
`
`_
`
`N
`
`OCH3
`
`Mg2+
`
`.
`
`3 H2O
`
`2
`
`The magnesium salt is a white to slightly colored crystalline powder. It contains 3 moles of water of
`solvation and is slightly soluble in water.
`The stability of esomeprazole magnesium is a function of pH; it rapidly degrades in acidic media, but it
`has acceptable stability under alkaline conditions. At pH 6.8 (buffer), the half-life of the magnesium
`salt is about 19 hours at 25°C and about 8 hours at 37°C.
`
`NEXIUM is supplied as Delayed-Release Capsules for oral administration. Each delayed-release
`capsule contains 20 mg or 40 mg of esomeprazole (present as 22.3 mg or 44.5 mg esomeprazole
`magnesium trihydrate) in the form of enteric-coated pellets with the following inactive ingredients:
`glyceryl monostearate 40-50, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, magnesium
`stearate, methacrylic acid copolymer type C, polysorbate 80, sugar spheres, talc, and triethyl citrate.
`The capsule shells have the following inactive ingredients: gelatin, FD&C Blue #1, FD&C Red #40,
`D&C Red #28, titanium dioxide, shellac, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, n-butyl alcohol, propylene
`glycol, sodium hydroxide, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and D&C Yellow #10.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`Pharmacokinetics
`Absorption
`NEXIUM Delayed-Release Capsules contain an enteric-coated pellet formulation of esomeprazole
`magnesium. After oral administration peak plasma levels (Cmax) occur at approximately 1.5 hours
`(Tmax). The Cmax increases proportionally when the dose is increased, and there is a three-fold increase
`in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 20 to 40 mg. At repeated once-daily
`dosing with 40 mg, the systemic bioavailability is approximately 90% compared to 64% after a single
`dose of 40 mg. The mean exposure (AUC) to esomeprazole increases from 4.32 µmol*hr/L on day 1 to
`
`Lupin Exh. 1025
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 5
`
`11.2 µmol*hr/L on day 5 after 40 mg once daily dosing.
`The AUC after administration of a single 40 mg dose of esomeprazole is decreased by 33-53% after
`food intake compared to fasting conditions. Esomeprazole should be taken at least one hour before
`meals.
`
`The pharmacokinetic profile of esomeprazole was determined in 36 patients with symptomatic
`gastroesophageal reflux disease following repeated once daily administration of 20 mg and 40 mg
`capsules of NEXIUM over a period of five days. The results are shown in the following table:
`
`Parameter
`
`Pharmacokinetic Parameters of NEXIUM Following Oral Dosing for 5 days
`NEXIUM
`NEXIUM
`40 mg
`20 mg
`AUC (µmol*h/L)
`12.6
`4.2
` Coefficient of variation 42%
`59%
`Cmax (µmol/L)
`4.7
`2.1
`Tmax (h)
`1.6
`1.6
`t1/2 (h)
`1.5
`1.2
`Values represent the geometric mean, except the Tmax, which is the arithmetic mean.
`
`Distribution
`Esomeprazole is 97% bound to plasma proteins. Plasma protein binding is constant over the
`concentration range of 2-20 µmol/L. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state in healthy
`volunteers is approximately 16 L.
`
`Metabolism
`Esomeprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system.
`The metabolites of esomeprazole lack antisecretory activity. The major part of esomeprazole’s
`metabolism is dependent upon the CYP2C19 isoenzyme, which forms the hydroxy and desmethyl
`metabolites. The remaining amount is dependent on CYP3A4 which forms the sulphone metabolite.
`CYP2C19 isoenzyme exhibits polymorphism in the metabolism of esomeprazole, since some 3% of
`Caucasians and 15-20% of Asians lack CYP2C19 and are termed Poor metabolizers. At steady state,
`the ratio of AUC in Poor metabolizers to AUC in the rest of the population (Extensive metabolizers) is
`approximately 2.
`
`Following administration of equimolar doses, the S- and R-isomers are metabolized differently by the liver,
`resulting in higher plasma levels of the S- than of the R-isomer.
`
`Excretion
`The plasma elimination half-life of esomeprazole is approximately 1-1.5 hours. Less than 1% of parent
`drug is excreted in the urine. Approximately 80% of an oral dose of esomeprazole is excreted as
`inactive metabolites in the urine, and the remainder is found as inactive metabolites in the feces.
`Special Populations
`Geriatric
`The AUC and Cmax values were slightly higher (25% and 18%, respectively) in the elderly as compared
`to younger subjects at steady state. Dosage adjustment based on age is not necessary.
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 6
`
`Pediatric
`The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole have not been studied in patients < 18 years of age.
`
`Gender
`The AUC and Cmax values were slightly higher (13%) in females than in males at steady state. Dosage
`adjustment based on gender is not necessary.
`
`Hepatic Insufficiency
`The steady state pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole obtained after administration of 40 mg once daily to
`4 patients each with mild (Child Pugh A), moderate (Child Pugh Class B), and severe (Child Pugh Class
`C) liver insufficiency were compared to those obtained in 36 male and female GERD patients with normal
`liver function. In patients with mild and moderate hepatic insufficiency, the AUCs were within the range
`that could be expected in patients with normal liver function. In patients with severe hepatic insufficiency
`the AUCs were 2 to 3 times higher than in the patients with normal liver function. No dosage adjustment
`is recommended for patients with mild to moderate hepatic insufficiency (Child Pugh Classes A and B).
`However, in patients with severe hepatic insufficiency (Child Pugh Class C) a dose of 20 mg once daily
`should not be exceeded (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
`
`Renal Insufficiency
`The pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in patients with renal impairment are not expected to be altered
`relative to healthy volunteers as less than 1% of esomeprazole is excreted unchanged in urine.
`
`Pharmacokinetics: Combination Therapy with Antimicrobials
`Esomeprazole magnesium 40 mg once daily was given in combination with clarithromycin 500 mg
`twice daily and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 7 days to 17 healthy male and female subjects. The
`mean steady state AUC and Cmax of esomeprazole increased by 70% and 18%, respectively during
`triple combination therapy compared to treatment with esomeprazole alone. The observed increase in
`esomeprazole exposure during co-administration with clarithromycin and amoxicillin is not expected
`to produce significant safety concerns.
`
`The pharmacokinetic parameters for clarithromycin and amoxicillin were similar during triple
`combination therapy and administration of each drug alone. However, the mean AUC and Cmax for 14-
`hydroxyclarithromycin increased by 19% and 22%, respectively, during triple combination therapy
`compared to treatment with clarithromycin alone. This increase in exposure to 14-
`hydroxyclarithromycin is not considered to be clinically significant.
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`Mechanism of Action
`Esomeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that suppresses gastric acid secretion by specific inhibition of the
`H+/K+-ATPase in the gastric parietal cell. The S- and R-isomers are protonated and converted in the acidic
`compartment of the parietal cell forming the active inhibitor, the achiral sulphenamide. By acting
`specifically on the proton pump, esomeprazole blocks the final step in acid production, thus reducing
`gastric acidity. This effect is dose-related up to a daily dose of 20 to 40 mg and leads to inhibition of
`gastric acid secretion.
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 7
`
`Antisecretory Activity
`The effect of esomeprazole on intragastric pH was determined in patients with symptomatic
`gastroesophageal reflux disease in two separate studies. In the first study of 36 patients, NEXIUM 40
`mg and 20 mg capsules were administered over 5 days. The results are shown in the following table:
`
`Effect on Intragastric pH On Day 5 (N=36)
`Parameter
`NEXIUM
`NEXIUM
`40 mg
`20 mg
`70%*
`53%
`% Time Gastric
`pH >4† (Hours)
` (16.8 h)
` (12.7 h)
`26%
`37%
` Coefficient of variation
`Median 24 Hour pH 4.9*
`4.1
`16%
`27%
`Coefficient of variation
`
` † Gastric pH was measured over a 24-hour period
`*p< 0.01 NEXIUM 40 mg vs NEXIUM 20 mg
`
`In a second study, the effect on intragastric pH of NEXIUM 40 mg administered once daily over a five
`day period was similar to the first study, (% time with pH>4 was 68% or 16.3 hours).
`
`Serum Gastrin Effects
`The effect of NEXIUM on serum gastrin concentrations was evaluated in approximately 2,700 patients
`in clinical trials up to 8 weeks and in over 1,300 patients for up to 6-12 months. The mean fasting
`gastrin level increased in a dose-related manner. This increase reached a plateau within two to three
`months of therapy and returned to baseline levels within four weeks after discontinuation of therapy.
`
`Enterochromaffin-like (ECL) Cell Effects
`In 24-month carcinogenicity studies of omeprazole in rats, a dose-related significant occurrence of
`gastric ECL cell carcinoid tumors and ECL cell hyperplasia was observed in both male and female
`animals (see PRECAUTIONS, Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility). Carcinoid
`tumors have also been observed in rats subjected to fundectomy or long-term treatment with other
`proton pump inhibitors or high doses of H2-receptor antagonists.
`
`Human gastric biopsy specimens have been obtained from more than 3,000 patients treated with
`omeprazole in long-term clinical trials. The incidence of ECL cell hyperplasia in these studies increased
`with time; however, no case of ECL cell carcinoids, dysplasia, or neoplasia has been found in these
`patients.
`
`In over 1,000 patients treated with NEXIUM (10, 20 or 40 mg/day) up to 6-12 months, the prevalence
`of ECL cell hyperplasia increased with time and dose. No patient developed ECL cell carcinoids,
`dysplasia, or neoplasia in the gastric mucosa.
`
`Endocrine Effects
`NEXIUM had no effect on thyroid function when given in oral doses of 20 or 40 mg for 4 weeks. Other
`effects of NEXIUM on the endocrine system were assessed using omeprazole studies. Omeprazole
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 8
`
`given in oral doses of 30 or 40 mg for 2 to 4 weeks had no effect on carbohydrate metabolism,
`circulating levels of parathyroid hormone, cortisol, estradiol, testosterone, prolactin, cholecystokinin or
`secretin.
`
`Microbiology
`Esomeprazole magnesium, amoxicillin and clarithromycin triple therapy has been shown to be active
`against most strains of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in vitro and in clinical infections as described in
`the Clinical Studies and INDICATIONS AND USAGE sections.
`
`Helicobacter
`Helicobacter pylori
`Susceptibility testing of H. pylori isolates was performed for amoxicillin and clarithromycin using agar
`dilution methodology, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined.
`
`Pretreatment Resistance
`Clarithromycin pretreatment resistance rate (MIC ≥ 1 µg/mL) to H. pylori was 15% (66/445) at
`baseline in all treatment groups combined. A total of > 99% (394/395) of patients had H. pylori
`isolates which were considered to be susceptible (MIC ≤ 0.25 µg/mL) to amoxicillin at baseline. One
`patient had a baseline
`H. pylori isolate with an amoxicillin MIC = 0.5 µg /mL.
`
`Clarithromycin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriologic Outcomes
`The baseline H. pylori clarithromycin susceptibility results and the H. pylori eradication results at the
`Day 38 visit are shown in the table below:
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 9
`
`H. pylori
`negative
`(Eradicated)
`
`Clarithromycin
`Pretreatment
`Results
`
`Clarithromycin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriological Outcomes a for Triple
`Therapy - (Esomeprazole magnesium 40 mg once daily/amoxicillin
`1000 mg twice daily/clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for
`10 days)
`H. pylori positive
`(Not Eradicated)
`Post-treatment susceptibility
`results
`Rb No MIC
`Ib
`Sb
`Susceptibleb 182
`2
`14
`0
`4
`162
`Intermediateb 1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`1
`Resistantb 29
`13
`2
`0
`1
`13
`aIncludes only patients with pretreatment and post-treatment clarithromycin susceptibility test results
`bSusceptible (S) MIC ≤ 0.25 µg/mL, Intermediate (I) MIC =0.5 µg/mL, Resistant (R) MIC ≥ 1.0 µg /mL
`
`Patients not eradicated of H. pylori following esomeprazole magnesium/amoxicillin/clarithromycin
`triple therapy will likely have clarithromycin resistant H. pylori isolates. Therefore, clarithromycin
`susceptibility testing should be done, when possible. Patients with clarithromycin resistant H. pylori
`should not be re-treated with a clarithromycin-containing regimen.
`
`Amoxicillin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriological Outcomes
`In the esomeprazole magnesium/amoxicillin/clarithromycin clinical trials, 83% (176/212) of the
`patients in the esomeprazole magnesium/amoxicillin/clarithromycin treatment group who had
`pretreatment amoxicillin susceptible MICs (≤ 0.25 µg/mL) were eradicated of H. pylori, and 17%
`(36/212) were not eradicated of H. pylori. Of the 36 patients who were not eradicated of H. pylori on
`triple therapy, 16 had no post-treatment susceptibility test results and 20 had post-treatment H. pylori
`isolates with amoxicillin susceptible MICs. Fifteen of the patients who were not eradicated of H. pylori
`on triple therapy also had post-treatment H. pylori isolates with clarithromycin resistant MICs. There
`were no patients with H. pylori isolates who developed treatment emergent resistance to amoxicillin.
`
`Susceptibility Test for Helicobacter pylori
`The reference methodology for susceptibility testing of H. pylori is agar dilution MICs. One to three
`microliters of an inoculum equivalent to a No.2 McFarland standard (1 x 107 - 1 x 108 CFU/mL for
`H. pylori) are inoculated directly onto freshly prepared antimicrobial containing Mueller-Hinton agar
`plates with 5% aged defibrinated sheep blood (2 weeks old). The agar dilution plates are incubated at
`35°C in a microaerobic environment produced by a gas generating system suitable for Campylobacter.
`After 3 days of incubation, the MICs are recorded as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent
`required to inhibit growth of the organism. The clarithromycin and amoxicillin MIC values should be
`interpreted according to the following criteria:
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 10
`
`Clarithromycin MIC (µg/mL) a
`≤ 0.25
`0.5
`≥1.0
`
`Interpretation
`Susceptible
`Intermediate
`Resistant
`
`(S)
`(I)
`(R)
`
`Amoxicillin MIC (µg/mL) a,b
`Interpretation
`≤ 0.25
`(S)
`Susceptible
`These are breakpoints for the agar dilution methodology and they should not be used to interpret results obtained using alternative
`methods.
`There were not enough organisms with MICs > 0.25 µg /mL to determine a resistance breakpoint.
`
`a
`
`b
`
`Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of laboratory control microorganisms to
`control the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures. Standard clarithromycin and amoxicillin
`powders should provide the following MIC values:
`
`Antimicrobial
`Agent
`Clarithromycin
`
`Microorganism
`
`MIC (µg/mL) a
`
`H. pylori ATCC
`0.016 – 0.12
`(µg/mL)
`43504
`H. pylori ATCC
`0.016 – 0.12
`(µg/mL)
`43504
`a These are quality control ranges for the agar dilution methodology and
`they should not be used to control test results obtained using alternative
`methods.
`
`Amoxicillin
`
`Clinical Studies
` Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
`The healing rates of NEXIUM 40 mg, NEXIUM 20 mg, and omeprazole 20 mg (the approved dose for this
`indication) were evaluated in patients with endoscopically diagnosed erosive esophagitis in four
`multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies. The healing rates at weeks 4 and 8 were evaluated and are
`shown in the table below:
`
`Erosive Esophagitis Healing Rate (Life-Table Analysis)
`No. of
`Significance
`Patients Treatment Groups
`Level *
`588
`NEXIUM 20 mg
`N.S.
`588
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`654
`NEXIUM 40 mg
`656
`NEXIUM 20 mg
`650
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`576
`NEXIUM 40 mg
`572
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`1216
`NEXIUM 40 mg
`1209
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`
`p < 0.001
`p < 0.05
`
`N.S.
`
`p < 0.001
`
`Week 4 Week 8
`68.7% 90.6%
`69.5% 88.3%
`75.9% 94.1%
`70.5% 89.9%
`64.7% 86.9%
`71.5% 92.2%
`68.6% 89.8%
`81.7% 93.7%
`68.7% 84.2%
`
`Study
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 11
`
`*log-rank test vs omeprazole 20 mg
`N.S. = not significant (p > 0.05).
`
`In these same studies of patients with erosive esophagitis, sustained heartburn resolution and time to
`sustained heartburn resolution were evaluated and are shown in the table below:
`
`Sustained Resolution‡ of Heartburn (Erosive Esophagitis Patients)
`
`Study
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`p <0.001
`N.S.
`
`N.S.
`
`p <0.001
`
`Cumulative Percent#
`with Sustained
`Resolution
`
`Significance
`Level *
`N.S.
`
`No. of
`Day 28
`Day 14
`Patients Treatment Groups
`72.7%
`64.3%
`573
`NEXIUM 20 mg
`70.9%
`64.1%
`555
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`74.2%
`64.8%
`621
`NEXIUM 40 mg
`70.1%
`62.9%
`620
`NEXIUM 20 mg
`66.6%
`56.5%
`626
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`73.9%
`65.4%
`568
`NEXIUM 40 mg
`73.1%
`65.5%
`551
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`75.1%
`67.6%
`1187
`NEXIUM 40 mg
`70.8%
`62.5%
`1188
`Omeprazole 20 mg
`‡Defined as 7 consecutive days with no heartburn reported in daily patient diary.
`#Defined as the cumulative proportion of patients who have reached the start of sustained resolution
`*log-rank test vs omeprazole 20 mg
`N.S. = not significant (p > 0.05).
`
`In these four studies, the range of median days to the start of sustained resolution (defined as 7 consecutive
`days with no heartburn) was 5 days for NEXIUM 40 mg, 7-8 days for NEXIUM 20 mg and 7-9 days for
`omeprazole 20 mg.
`
`There are no comparisons of 40 mg of NEXIUM with 40 mg of omeprazole in clinical trials assessing
`either healing or symptomatic relief of erosive esophagitis.
`
`Long-Term Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
`Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled 4-arm trials were conducted in patients
`with endoscopically confirmed, healed erosive esophagitis to evaluate NEXIUM 40 mg (n=174), 20 mg
`(n=180), 10 mg (n= 168) or placebo (n=171) once daily over six months of treatment.
`
`No additional clinical benefit was seen with NEXIUM 40 mg over NEXIUM 20 mg.
`
`The percentage of patients that maintained healing of erosive esophagitis at the various time points are
`shown in the figures below:
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`
`NDA 21-154
`
`Page 12
`
`Maintenance of Healing Rates by Month (Study 177)
`
`1
`
`‘-.‘..
`
`PetcentMainlaircd
`
`anO
`888383888
`
`s= scheduled visit
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`
`NDA 21-154
`
`Page 13
`
`Maintenance of Healing Rates by Month (Study 178)
`
`Percent
`
`Maintained SB‘
`
`Patients remained in remission significantly longer and the number of recurrences of erosive
`esophagitis was significantly less in patients treated with NEXIUM compared to placebo.
`
`In both studies, the proportion of patients on NEXIUM who remained in remission and were free of
`heartbmn and other GERD symptoms was well differentiated from placebo.
`
`In a third multicenter open label study of 808 patients treated for 12 months with NEXIUM 40 mg, the
`percentage ofpatients that maintained healing of erosive esophagitis was 93.7% for six months and 89.4%
`for one year.
`
`Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
`Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted in a total of
`717 patients comparing fo11r weeks of treatment with NEXIUM 20 mg or 40 mg once daily versus
`placebo for resolution of GERD symptoms. Patients had 2 6-month history of heartburn episodes, no
`erosive esophagitis by endoscopy, and heartburn on at least four of the seven days immediately
`preceding randomization.
`
`The percentage of patients that were symptom-free of heartburn was significantly higher in the
`NEXIUM groups compared to placebo at all follow-up visits (Weeks 1, 2, and 4).
`
`No additional clinical benefit was seen with NEXIUM 40 mg over NEXIUM 20 mg.
`
`The percent of patients symptom-free of heartburn by day are shown in the figures below:
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`
`NDA 21-154
`
`Page 14
`
`Percent of Patients Symptom-Free of Heartburn by Day
`(Study 225)
`
`100
`
`—O— Nuiul 40 I;
`----h--- Nuiul 20 I;
`
`~I V:
`
`Pm:nlofPa¢iem
`
`Symptom-FmhiHI:V:O
`
`Diary Day
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`
`NDA 21-154
`
`Page 15
`
`100
`
`Percent of Patients Symptom—Free of Heartburn by Day
`(Study 226)
`
`~I\fl
`
`PowellofPniml
`
`Sylnpun-FreeNU:LII9
`
`In three European symptomatic GERD trials, NEXIUM 20 mg and 40 mg and omeprazole 20 mg were
`evaluated. No significant treatment related differences were seen.
`
`Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) Eradication in Patients with Duodenal Ulcer Disease
`Triple Therapy 0/EUUJIJ/amoxicillin/clarithromycin): Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind
`studies were conducted using a 10 day treatment regimen. The first study (191) compared NEXIUM 40
`mg once daily in combination with amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily and clarithromycin 500 mg twice
`daily to NEXIUM 40 mg once daily plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily. The second study (193)
`compared NEXIUM 40 mg once daily in combination with amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily and
`clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily to NEXIUM 40 mg once daily. H. p_vIori eradication rates, defined
`as at least two negative tests and no positive tests from CLOtest®, histology and/or culture, at 4 weeks
`post-therapy were significantly higher in the NEXIUM plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin group than
`in the NEXIUM plus clarithromycin or NEXIUM alone group. The results are shown in the following
`table:
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 16
`
`Study
`191
`
`193
`
`Treatment Group
`NEXIUM plus
`amoxicillin and
`clarithromycin
`NEXIUM plus
`clarithromycin
`
`NEXIUM plus
`amoxicillin and
`clarithromycin
`NEXIUM
`
`H. pylori Eradication Rates at 4 Weeks after 10 Day Treatment Regimen
`% of Patients Cured
`[95% Confidence Interval]
`(Number of patients)
`Per-Protocol†
`Intent-to-Treat ‡
`77%*
`84%*
`[71, 82]
`[78, 89]
`(n=233)
`(n=196)
`55%
`52%
`[48, 62]
`[45, 59]
`(n=187)
`(n=215)
`85%**
`78%**
`[74, 93]
`[67, 87]
`(n=67)
`(n=74)
`5%
`4%
`[0, 23]
`[0, 21]
`(n=22)
`(n=24)
`† Patients were included in the analysis if they had H. pylori infection documented at baseline, had at least one endoscopically verified
`duodenal ulcer ≥ 0.5 cm in diameter at baseline or had a documented history of duodenal ulcer disease within the past 5 years, and were
`not protocol violators. Patients who dropped out of the study due to an adverse event related to the study drug were included in the
`analysis as not H. pylori eradicated.
`‡ Patients were included in the analysis if they had documented H. pylori infection at baseline, had at least one documented duodenal
`ulcer at baseline, or had a documented history of duodenal ulcer disease, and took at least one dose of study medication. All dropouts
`were included as not H. pylori eradicated.
`*p < 0.05 compared to NEXIUM plus clarithromycin
`**p < 0.05 compared to NEXIUM alone
`
`The percentage of patients with a healed baseline duodenal ulcer by 4 weeks after the 10 day treatment
`regimen in the NEXIUM plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin group was 75% (n=156) and 57% (n=60)
`respectively, in the 191 and 193 studies (per-protocol analysis).
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
`Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
`NEXIUM is indicated for the short-term treatment (4 to 8 weeks) in the healing and symptomatic
`resolution of diagnostically confirmed erosive esophagitis. For those patients who have not healed after
`4-8 weeks of treatment, an additional 4-8-week course of NEXIUM may be considered.
`
`Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
`NEXIUM is indicated to maintain symptom resolution and healing of erosive esophagitis. Controlled
`studies do not extend beyond 6 months.
`
`Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
`NEXIUM is indicated for treatment of heartburn and other symptoms associated with GERD.
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 17
`
`H. pylori Eradication to Reduce the Risk of Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence
`Triple Therapy (NEXIUM plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin): NEXIUM, in combination with
`amoxicillin and clarithromycin, is indicated for the treatment of patients with H. pylori infection and
`duodenal ulcer disease (active or history of within the past 5 years) to eradicate H. pylori. Eradication of
`H. pylori has been shown to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence. (See CLINICAL STUDIES
`and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
`
`In patients who fail therapy, susceptibility testing should be done. If resistance to clarithromycin is
`demonstrated or susceptibility testing is not possible, alternative antimicrobial therapy should be
`instituted. (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Microbiology and the clarithromycin package
`insert, CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Microbiology.)
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`NEXIUM is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to any component of the
`formulation or to substituted benzimidazoles.
`
`Clarithromycin is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to any macrolide antibiotic.
`
`Concomitant administration of clarithromycin with pimozide is contraindicated. There have been post-
`marketing reports of drug interactions when clarithromycin and/or erythromycin are co-administered
`with pimozide resulting in cardiac arrhythmias (QT prolongation, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular
`fibrillation, and torsade de pointes) most likely due to inhibition of hepatic metabolism of pimozide by
`erythromycin and clarithromycin. Fatalities have been reported. (Please refer to full prescribing
`information for clarithromycin.)
`
`Amoxicillin is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to any penicillin. (Please refer
`to full prescribing information for amoxicillin.)
`
`WARNINGS
`CLARITHROMYCIN SHOULD NOT BE USED IN PREGNANT WOMEN EXCEPT IN
`CLINICAL CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE NO ALTERNATIVE THERAPY IS
`APPROPRIATE. IF PREGNANCY OCCURS WHILE TAKING CLARITHROMYCIN, THE
`PATIENT SHOULD BE APPRISED OF THE POTENTIAL HAZARD TO THE FETUS. (See
`WARNINGS in prescribing information for clarithromycin.)
`
`Amoxicillin: Serious and occasionally fatal hypersensitivity (anaphylactic) reactions have been
`reported in patients on penicillin therapy. These reactions are more apt to occur in individuals with a
`history of penicillin hypersensitivity and/or a history of sensitivity to multiple allergens.
`
`There have been well documented reports of individuals with a history of penicillin hypersensitivity
`reactions who have experienced severe hypersensitivity reactions when treated with a cephalosporin.
`Before initiating therapy with any penicillin, careful inquiry should be made concerning previous
`hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins, cephalosporins, and other allergens. If an allergic reaction
`occurs, amoxicillin should be discontinued and the appropriate therapy instituted.
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 18
`
`SERIOUS ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS REQUIRE IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY TREATMENT
`WITH EPINEPHRINE. OXYGEN, INTRAVENOUS STEROIDS, AND AIRWAY
`MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING INTUBATION, SHOULD ALSO BE ADMINISTERED AS
`INDICATED.
`
`Pseudomembranous colitis has been reported with nearly all antibacterial agents, including
`clarithromycin and amoxicillin, and may range in severity from mild to life threatening.
`Therefore, it is important to consider this diagnosis in patients who present with diarrhea
`subsequent to the administration of antibacterial agents.
`
`Treatment with antibacterial agents alters the normal flora of the colon and may permit overgrowth of
`clostridia. Studies indicate that a toxin produced by Clostridium difficile is a primary cause of
`“antibiotic-associated colitis”.
`
`After the diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis has been established, therapeutic measures should be
`initiated. Mild cases of pseudomembranous colitis usually respond to discontinuation of the drug
`alone. In moderate to severe cases, consideration should be given to management with fluids and
`electrolytes, protein supplementation, and treatment with an antibacterial drug clinically effective
`against Clostridium difficile colitis.
`
`PRECAUTIONS
`General
`Symptomatic response to therapy with NEXIUM does not preclude the presence of gastric malignancy.
`
`Atrophic gastritis has been noted occasionally in gastric corpus biopsies from patients treated long-
`term with omeprazole, of which NEXIUM is an enantiomer.
`
`Information for Patients
`Patients should be informed of the following:
`NEXIUM Delayed-Release Capsules should be taken at least one hour before meals.
`
`For patients who have difficulty swallowing capsules, one tablespoon of applesauce can be added to an
`empty bowl and the NEXIUM Delayed-Release Capsule can be opened, and the pellets inside the
`capsule carefully emptied onto the applesauce. The pellets should be mixed with the applesauce and
`then swallowed immediately. The applesauce used should not be hot and should be soft enough to be
`swallowed without chewing. The pellets should not be chewed or crushed. The pellet/applesauce
`mixture should not be stored for future use.
`
`Antacids may be used while taking NEXIUM.
`
`Drug Interactions
`Esomeprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4.
`
`In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that esomeprazole is not likely to inhibit CYPs 1A2, 2A6, 2C9,
`2D6, 2E1 and 3A4. No clinically relevant interactions with drugs metabolized by these CYP enzymes
`
`

`
`NDA 21-153
`NDA 21-154
`Page 19
`
`would be expected. Drug interaction studies have shown that esomeprazole does not have any
`clinically significant interactions with phenytoin, warfarin, quinidine, clarithromycin or amoxicillin.
`
`Esomeprazole may potentially interfere with CYP2C19, the major esomeprazole metabolizing enzyme.
`Coadministration of esomeprazole 30 mg and diazepam, a CYP2C19 substrate, resulted in a 45%
`decrease in clearance of diazepam. Increased plasma levels of diazepam were observed 12 hours after
`dosing and onwards. However, at that time, the plasma levels of diazepam were below the therapeutic
`interval, and thus this interaction is unlikely to be of clinical relevance.
`
`Esomeprazole inhibits gastric acid secretion. Therefore, esomeprazole may interfere with the
`absorption of drugs where gastric pH is an important determinant of bioavailability (eg, ketoconazole,
`iron salts and digoxin).
`
`Coadministration of oral contraceptives, diazepam, phenytoin, or quinidine did not seem to change the
`pharmacokinetic profile of esomeprazole.
`
`Combination Therapy with Clarithromycin
`Co-administration of esomeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin has resulted in increases in the
`plasma levels of esomeprazole and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin. (See CLINICAL
`PHARMACOLOGY, Pharmacokinetics: Combination Therapy with Antimicrobials.)
`
`Concomitant administration of clarithromycin with pimozide is contraindicated. (See clarithromycin
`package insert.)
`
`Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`The carcinogenic potential of esomeprazole was assessed using omeprazole studies. In two 24-month oral
`carcinogenicity studies
`in rats, omeprazole at daily doses of 1.7, 3.4, 13.8, 44.0 and
`140.8 mg/kg/day (about 0.7 to 57 times the human dose of 20 mg/day expressed on a body surface area
`basis) produced gastric ECL cell carcinoids in a dose-related manner in both male and female rats; the
`incidence of this effect was markedly higher in female rats, which had higher blood levels of omeprazole.
` Gastric carcinoids seldom occur in the untreated rat. In addition, ECL cell hyperplasia was present in all
`treated groups of both sexes. In one of these studies, female rats were treated with 13.8 mg
`omeprazole/kg/day (about 5.6 times the human dose on a body surface area basis) for 1 year, then followed
`for an additional year without the drug. No carcinoids were seen in these rats. An increased incidence of
`treatment-related ECL cell hyperplasia was observed at the end of 1 year (94% treated vs 10% controls).
`By the second year the difference between treated and control rats was much smaller (46% vs 26%) but
`still showed more hyperplasia in the treated group. Gastric adenocarcinoma was seen in one rat (2%). No
`similar tumor was seen in male or female rats treated for 2 years. For this strain of rat no similar tumor has
`been noted historically, but a finding involving only one tumor is difficult to interpret. A 78-week mouse
`carcinogenicity study of omeprazole did not show increased tumor occurrence, but the study was not
`conclusive.
`
`Esomeprazole was negative in the Ames mutation test, in the in vivo rat bone marrow cell chromosome
`aberration test, and the in vivo mouse micronucleus test. E

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket