throbber
Lupin Exh. 1019
`
`Lupin Exh. 1019
`
`

`
`(cid:3) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:92)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:90)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:55)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:3)(cid:56)(cid:17)(cid:54)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:12)(cid:3)
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY 2000;118:S9-531
`
`Acid Suppression: Optimizing Therapy for Gastroduodenal
`Ulcer Healing, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and
`Stress-Related Erosive Syndrome
`
`M. MICHAEL WOLFE* and GEORGE SACHSI
`*Section of Gastroenterology. Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and 1‘Division of
`Gastroenterology, UCLA School of Medicine and West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
`
`ne of the hallmarks of the mammalian stomach is its
`
`Oability to secrete large quantities of concentrated
`
`(0.16 mol/L) hydrochloric acid (HCl).1 Although it is
`generally assmned that gastric acid and the proteolytic
`enzyme pepsin are required to initiate digestion, achlor—
`
`hydric individuals generally do not develop malabsorp-
`tion unless small bowel bacterial overgrowth is present. It
`
`is thus likely that the ability of the stomach to secrete
`acid evolved primarily from a need to sustain a sterile
`
`intragastric milieu. Organisms that possessed the capac-
`
`ity to kill ingested bacteria and other microbes were able
`to avoid the development of enteric colonization, and
`
`thereby ensure both efficient absorption of nutrients and
`prevention of systemic infections} Nevertheless, when
`
`present, gastric acid does play a significant role in protein
`hydrolysis and other aspects of the digestive process, and
`under various conditions, acid may play an etiologic role
`
`in producing various forms of discomfort and inciting
`esophageal and gastroduodenal rnucosal injury.
`
`The normal human stomach contains approximately 1
`billion parietal cells that secrete hydrogen ions into the
`
`gastric lumen in response to various physiological stimuli.
`The generation of H+ ions is mediated by 3 pathways:
`neurocrine, paracrine, and endocrine (Figure 1). The
`principal neurocrine transmitter is acetylcholine, which
`
`is released by vagal postganglionjc neurons and appears to
`stimulate H+ ion generation directly via a parietal cell
`muscarinic M3 receptor. Histamine is the primary para-
`crine transmitter that binds to H2—specific receptors on
`
`parietal cells. Adenylate cyclase is then activated, leading
`to an increase in adenosine 5'5’-cyclic monophosphate
`(CAMP) levels and subsequent generation of H+ ions. The
`secretion of gastrin from antral G cells comprises the
`endocrine pathway and stimulates H+ ion generation
`both directlyand indirectly, the latter by stimulating
`histamine secretion from enterochrornaffin-like (ECL)
`
`cells of the corpus and fundus.
`
`Interactions among
`
`neurocrine, paracrine, and endocrine pathways are coordi-
`nated to promote or inhibit H"' ion generation. Hista-
`
`mine appears to represent the dominant route, because
`gastrin stimulates acid secretion principally by promot-
`ing histamine release from ECL Ce-lls.2.=3 Thus, ECL cells
`are often referred to as "controller" cells in the process of
`gastric acid secretion.
`A negative feedback loop governs both gastrin release
`and the return of acid secretion to basal level.1-‘L6 This
`
`autoregulatory mechanism prevents postprandial acid
`
`hypersecretion. After ingestion of a meal, gastrin release
`stimulates secretion of gastric acid. The intraluminal pH
`begins to decrease, which stimulates releaseof sorI1atosta-
`tin from antral D cells, possibly through the activation of
`calcitonin gene—related peptide (CGRP) neurons.” So-
`matostatin then appears to act via a paracrine mechanism
`to inhibit
`further release of gastrin from G cel_ls.8
`Somatostatin produced by D cells in the gastric corpus
`and fundus may also directly inhibit acid secretion from
`parietal cells and may suppress histamine release from
`ECL cells (Figure 1).6-9 Other recent observations indicate
`that several other neurotransmitters, including vasoactive
`intestinal peptide (VIP), galanin, and pituitary adenylate
`cyclase—activating peptide, may play important roles in
`regulating gastric acid secretion, both directly and
`indirectly, under physiological conditions.”
`
`Pathophysiology of Acid-Related
`Disorders
`
`Gastroduodenal (Peptic) Ulcer
`
`The treatment of duodenal ulcer (DU) has served
`
`as the basis (correctly or incorrectly) for the management
`of nearly all acid—related disorders. This supposition in all
`likelihood contributed to delays in the optimal manage-
`ment of other gastrointestinal (GI) disorders in which
`
`Abbreviations used in this paper: DU, duodenal ulcer; ECL, entere-
`chromaffln-like; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; GI, gastro-
`intestinal; GU, gastric ulcer; NCCP, noncardiac chest pain; PPI,
`proton pump inhibitor; PUD, peptic ulcer disease.
`© 2000 by the American Gastroenterological Association
`0016-5085/00/$10.00

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket