throbber
Pharmaceutical Compositions for the Coordinated
`Delivery of NSAIDs
`
`Cross Reference to Related Applications
`
`The present application is a continuation—in—part of U.S. application no. 10/158,216,
`
`filed on May 31, 2002. The ‘2l6 application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional
`
`application no. 60/294,588, filed on June 1, 2001.
`
`Field of the Invention
`
`The present invention is directed to pharmaceutical compositions that provide for the
`
`coordinated release of an acid inhibitor and a non—steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
`
`(NSAID). These compositionsrhave a reduced likelihood of causing unwanted side effects,
`especially gastrointestinal side effects, when administered as a treatment for pain, arthritis
`
`and other conditions amenable to treatment with NSAIDs.
`
`Background of the Invention
`
`Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely accepted as effective
`
`agents
`
`for controlling pain,
`
`their administration can lead to the development of
`
`gastroduodenal lesions, e.g., ulcers and erosions, in susceptible individuals. It appears that a
`
`major factor contributing to the development of these lesions is the presence of acid in the
`
`stomach and upper small intestine of patients. This view is supported by clinical studies
`
`demonstrating an improvement
`
`in NSAID tolerability when patients are also taking
`
`independent doses of acid inhibitors (Dig. Dis. 122210-222 (1994); Drug Safety 211503-512
`
`(1999); Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 12:l35~140 (1998); Am. J. Med. 104(3A):67S-74S
`
`(1998); Clin. Ther. 17:1159-1173 (1995)). Other major factors contributing to NSAID-
`
`associated gastropathy include a local toxic effect of NSAlI)s and inhibition of protective
`
`prostaglandins (Can. J. Gastroenterol. 13:135—142 (1999) and Pract. Drug Safety 21:503-
`
`512, (1999)), which may also make some patients more susceptible to the ulcerogenic
`effects of other noxious stimuli.
`
`In general, more potent and longer lasting acid inhibitors, such as proton pump
`
`inhibitors, are thought to be more protective during chronic administration of NSAIDs than
`
`shorter acting agents, e.g., histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H-2 blockers)
`
`(N. Eng. J.
`
`Med. 338:719-726 (1998); Am. J. Med. 104(3A):56S-61S (1998)). The most
`
`likely
`
`Lupin Exh. 1003
`
`

`
`2
`
`explanation for this is that gastric pH fluctuates widely throughout the dosing interval with
`
`short acting acid inhibitors leaving the mucosa vulnerable for significant periods of time. In
`
`particular, the pH is at its lowest point, and hence the mucosa is most vulnerable, at the end
`
`of the dosing interval (least amount of acid inhibition) and for some time after the
`
`subsequent dose of acid inhibitor. In general,
`
`it appears that when a short acting acid
`
`inhibitor and an NSAID are administered simultaneously, NSAID—related mucosal damage
`
`occurs before the pH of the gastrointestinal tract can be raised and after the acid inhibiting .
`
`effect of the short acting acid inhibitor dissipates.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Although longer lasting agents, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIS), usually
`
`maintain a consistently higher gastroduodenal pH throughout the day, their antisecretory
`
`effect may be delayed for several hours and may not take full effect for several days (Clin.
`
`Pharmacokinet. 20:38-49 (1991)). Their effect may be diminished toward the end of the
`
`usual dosing interval. Intragastric pH rises particularly slowly with the first dose in a course
`
`of treatment since this class of drugs is enteric coated to avoid destruction by stomach acid.
`
`As a result, absorption is delayed for several hours. Even then, some patients fail to respond
`
`consistently to drugs of this type and suffer from “acid breakthrough” which again leaves
`
`them vulnerable to NSAID-associated gastroduodenal damage (Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.
`
`14:709-714 (2000)). Despite a significant reduction in gastroduodenal
`
`lesions with the
`
`concomitant administration of a proton pump inhibitor during six months of NSAID
`
`therapy, up to 16% of patients still develop ulcers, indicating that there remains substantial
`
`room for improvement (N. Eng. J. Med. 338:727—734 (1998)). Thus, the addition of a pH
`
`sensitive enteric coating to an NSAID could provide additional protection against
`
`gastroduodenal damage not provided by the H2 blocker or PPI alone. In addition, although
`
`long acting acid inhibitors may reduce the risk of GI lesions in chronic NSAID users, there
`
`are questions about the safety of maintaining an abnormally elevated pH in a patient’s GI
`
`tract for a prolonged period of time (Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl. 1 78:85-92 (1990)).
`
`Recognizing the potential benefits of PPIS for the prevention of NSAID-induced
`
`gastroduodenal damage, others have disclosed strategies for combining the two active
`
`agents for therapeutic purposes. However, these suggestions do not provide for coordinated
`
`drug release or for reducing intragastric acid levels to a non~toxic level prior to the release
`
`ofNSAID (U.S. 5,204,118; U.S. 5,417,980; U.S. 5,466,436; and U.S. 5,037,815). In certain
`
`

`
`3
`
`cases, suggested means of delivery would expose the gastrointestinal tract to NSAIDS prior
`
`to onset of PPI activity (U.S. 6,365,184).
`
`Attempts to develop NSAIDS that are inherently less toxic to the gastrointestinal
`
`tract have met with only limited success. For example,
`
`the recently developed
`
`cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors show a reduced tendency to produce gastrointestinal
`
`ulcers and erosions, but a significant risk is still present, especially if the patient is exposed
`
`to other ulcerogens (JAMA 284:1247-1255 (2000); N. Eng. J. Med. 343:1520-1528 (2000)).
`
`In this regard, it appears that even low doses of aspirin will negate most of the benefit
`
`relating to lower gastrointestinal lesions. In addition, the COX-2 inhibitors may not be as -
`
`effective as other NSAIDS at relieving some types of pain and have been associated with
`
`significant cardiovascular problems (JADA 131:l729-1737 (2000); SCRIP 2617, pg. 19,
`
`Feb. 14, 2001); NY Times, May 22, 2001, pg. C1)).
`
`Other attempts to produce an NSAID therapy with less gastrointestinal toxicity have
`
`involved the concomitant administration of a cytoprotective agent. In 1998, Searle began
`
`marketing ArthrotecTM for the treatment of arthritis in patients at risk for developing GI
`
`ulcers. This product contains misoprostol (a cytoprotective prostaglandin) and the NSAID
`
`diclofenac. Although patients administered ArthrotecTM do have a lower risk of developing
`
`ulcers, they may experience a number of other serious side effects such as diarrhea, severe
`
`cramping and, in the case of pregnant women, potential damage to the fetus.
`
`Another approach has been to produce enteric coated NSAID products. However,
`
`even though these have shown modest reductions in gastroduodenal damage in short term
`
`studies (Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 20: 239-242 (1985) and Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 25:231—
`
`234 (1990)), there is no consistent evidence of a long term benefit during chronic treatment.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Overall, it may be concluded that the risk of inducing GI ulcers is a recognized
`
`problem associated with the administration of NSAIDS and that, despite considerable effort,
`
`30
`
`an ideal solution has not yet been found.
`
`

`
`

`
`5
`
`inhibitor has been developed which competes with potassium at
`
`the acid pump. The
`
`compounds in this class have been referred to as “reversible proton pump inhibitors” or
`
`“acid pump antagonists” and may also be used in the present invention. Examples include
`
`AZD-0865, AR-H047108, CS-526, pumaprazole,
`
`revaprazan and soraprazan (see
`
`WO9605177 and WO9605199). Other compounds in this group are H-335/25 (Astrazeneca,
`
`Dialog file 128, accession number 020806); Sch—28080 (Schering Plough, Dialog file 128,
`
`accession
`
`number 009663); Sch—32651 (Schering Plough, Dialog file 128, accession
`
`number 006883) and SK&F~96067 (CAS Registry no. 115607-61-9).
`
`10
`
`15
`
`The pharmaceutical composition also contains a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
`
`drug in an amount effective to reduce or eliminate pain or inflammation. The NSAID may
`
`be celecoxib, rofecoxib, lumiracoxib, valdecoxib, parecoxib, etoricoxib, CS-502, JTE-522,
`
`L—745,337, NS398, aspirin, acetaminophen (considered to be an NSAID for the purposes of
`
`the present invention), ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen, oxaprozin, etodolac,
`
`indomethacin, ketorolac,
`
`lornoxicam, meloxicam, piroxicam, droxicam,
`
`tenoxicam,
`
`nabumetone, diclofenac, meclofenamate, mefenamic acid, diflunisal, sulindac,
`
`tolrnetin,
`
`fenoprofen,
`
`suprofen, benoxaprofen, aceclofenac,
`
`tolfenamic acid, oxyphenbutazone,
`
`azapropazone, and phenylbutazone. The most preferred NSAID is naproxen in an amount of
`
`between 50 mg and 1500 mg, and more preferably, in an amount of between 200 mg and
`
`20
`
`600 mg.
`
`It will be understood that, for the purposes of the present invention, reference to an
`
`acid inhibitor, NSAID, or analgesic agent will include all of the common forms of these
`
`compounds and,
`
`in particular,
`
`their pharmaceutically acceptable salts. The amounts of
`
`NSAHDS which are therapeutically effective may be lower in the current invention than
`
`otherwise found in practice due to potential positive kinetic interaction and NSAID
`
`25
`
`absorption in the presence of an acid inhibitor.
`
`Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention is in the form of
`
`a tablet or capsule that has: (a) the acid inhibitor present in an amount effective to raise the
`
`gastric pH of a patient to at least 3.5 upon the administration of one or more unit dosage
`
`30
`
`forms; and (b) the non—steroidal anti~inflammatory drug (NSAID) present in an amount
`
`effective to reduce or eliminate pain or inflammation in a patient upon administration of
`
`one or more of said unit dosage forms. The NSAID in the dosage form should be in a core,
`
`preferably a single core when tablets are used, that is surrounded by a coating that does not
`
`

`
`6
`
`release NSAID until the pH of the surrounding medium is 3.5 or higher. In the case of
`
`capsules, there may be several cores of NSAID, i. e., there may be multiple particles, each
`
`being surrounded by a coating that does not release NSAID until the pH of the surrounding
`
`medium is 3.5 or higher. The acid inhibitor is in one or more layers outside of the core
`
`which do not contain any NSAID. These layers are not surrounded by an enteric coating
`
`and, upon ingestion of the tablet or capsule by a patient, release the acid inhibitor into the
`
`patient’s stomach.
`
`The term “unit dosage form” as used herein refers to a single entity for drug
`
`10
`
`administration. For example, a single tablet or capsule combining both an acid inhibitor and
`
`an NSAID would be a unit dosage form. A unit dosage form of the present invention
`
`preferably provides for coordinated drug release in a way that elevates gastric pH and
`
`reduces the deleterious effects of the NSAID on the gastroduodenal mucosa, i.e., the acid
`
`inhibitor is released first and the release of NSAID is delayed until after the pH in the GI
`
`15
`
`tract has risen.
`
`In a preferred embodiment, the unit dosage form is a multilayer tablet, having an
`
`outer layer comprising the acid inhibitor and an inner core which comprises the NSAID. In
`
`the most preferred form, coordinated delivery is accomplished by having the inner core
`
`20
`
`surrounded by a polymeric barrier coating that does not dissolve unless the surrounding
`
`medium is at a pH of at least 3.5, preferably at least 4 and more preferably, at least 5.
`
`Alternatively, a barrier coating may be employed which controls the release of NSAID by
`
`time, as opposed to pH, with the rate adjusted so that NSAID is not released until after the
`
`pH of the gastrointestinal tract has risen to at least 3.5, preferably at least 4, and more
`
`25
`
`preferably at least 5. Thus, a time-release formulation may be used» to prevent the gastric
`
`presence of NSAID until mucosal tissue is no longer exposed to the damage enhancing
`
`effect of very low pH.
`
`One NSAID of special interest in dosage forms is aspirin which not only provides
`
`30
`
`relief from pain and inflammation but may also be used in low doses by patients to reduce
`
`the risk of stroke, heart attack and other conditions. Thus, pharmaceutical compositions may
`
`contain an acid inhibitor in combination with aspirin in an amount effective, upon the
`
`administration of one or more unit dosage forms, to acheive any of these objectives. As with
`
`

`
`7
`
`the compositions described above the unit dosage form can be a tablet or capsule in which
`
`aspirin is present in a core and is surrounded by a coating that does not release the aspirin
`
`until the pH of the surrounding medium is 3.5 or higher. The acid inhibitor is in one or more
`
`layers outside the core, which do not include an NSAID, are not surrounded by an enteric
`
`coating; and, upon ingestion of the dosage form by a patient, release the acid inhibitor into
`
`the patient’s stomach. Any of the acid inhibitors described herein may be used in the
`
`aspirin-containing dosage forms. In dosage forms designed for providing low dose aspirin
`
`therapy to patients, the aspirin should typically be present at 207200 mg.
`
`The invention includes methods of treating a patient for pain, inflammation and/or
`
`other conditions by administering the pharmaceutical compositions described above.”
`
`Although the method may be used for any condition in which an NSAID is effective, it is
`
`expected that it will be particularly useful in patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid
`
`arthritis. Other conditions that may be treated include, but are not limited to: all fonns of
`
`headache, including migraine headache; acute musculoskeletal pain; ankylosing spondylitis;
`
`dysmenorrhoea; myalgias; and neuralgias.
`
`In a more general sense,
`
`the invention includes methods of treating pain,
`
`inflammation and/or other conditions by orally administering an acid inhibitor at a dose
`
`effective to raise a patient’s gastric pH to at least 3.5, preferably to at least 4 or and more
`
`preferably to at least 5. The patient is also administered an NSAID, for example in a.
`
`coordinated dosage form, that has been coated in a polymer that only dissolves at a pH of at
`
`least 3.5, preferably at least 4 and, more preferably, 5 or greater or which dissolves at a rate
`
`that is slow enough to prevent NSAID release until after the pH has been raised. When acid
`
`inhibitor and NSAID are administered in separate doses, e.g., in two separate tablets, they
`
`should be given concomitantly (i. e., so that their biological effects overlap) and may be
`
`given concurrently, 1'. e., NSAID is given within one hour afler the acid inhibitor. Preferably,
`
`the acid inhibitor is an H2 blocker and, in the most preferred embodiment, it is famotidine at
`
`a dosage of between 5 mg and 100 mg. Proton pump inhibitors may also be used and offer
`
`advantages in terms of duration of action. Any of the NSAIDS described above may be used
`
`in the method but naproxen at a dosage of between 200 and 600 mg is most preferred. It is
`expected that the acid inhibitor and analgesic will be typically delivered as part of a single A
`
`unit dosage form which provides for the coordinated release of therapeutic agents. The most
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`

`
`8
`
`preferred dosage form is a multilayer tablet having an outer layer comprising an H2 blocker
`
`or a proton pump inhibitor and an inner core comprising an NSAID.
`
`The invention also provides a method for increasing compliance in a patient
`
`requiring frequent daily dosing of NSAIDS by providing both an acid inhibitor and NSAID
`
`in a single convenient, preferably coordinated, unit dosage form,
`
`thereby reducing the
`
`number of individual doses to be administered during any given period.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Brief Description of the Drawings
`
`Figure 1
`
`is a schematic diagram of a four layer tablet dosage form. There is a
`
`naproxen core layer surrounded by a barrier layer. A third, enteric coating, layer delays the
`
`release of naproxen sodium until the pH is at a specific level, e.g., above 4. Finally, there is
`
`an outer layer that releases an acid inhibitor such as famotidine.
`
`Figure 2 illustrates a three layer dosage form. An acid inhibitor, e.g., farnotidine, is
`
`released immediately after ingestion by a patient
`
`in order to raise the pH of the
`
`gastrointestinal tract to above a specific pH, e.g., above 4. The innermost layer contains
`
`naproxen. Thus, the dosage form has a naproxen core, an enteric film coat and an acid
`
`inhibitor film coat.
`
`Figure 3 illustrates a naproxen sodium pellet which contains a subcoat or barrier coat
`
`prior to the enteric fihn coat.
`
`Detailed Description of the Invention
`The present invention is based upon the discovery of improved pharmaceutical.
`
`25
`
`compositions for administering NSAIDS to patients. In addition to containing one or more
`
`NSAIDS, the compositions include acid inhibitors that are capable of raising the pH of the
`
`GI tract of patients. All of the dosage forms are designed for oral delivery and provide for
`
`the coordinated release of therapeutic agents, i.e., for the sequential release of acid inhibitor
`
`30
`
`followed by analgesic.
`
`The NSAlDs used in preparations may be either short or long acting. As used herein,
`
`the term “long acting” refers to an NSAID having a pharmacokinetic half—life of at least 2
`
`

`
`9
`
`hours, preferably at least 4 hours and more preferably, at least 8-14 hours. In general, its
`
`duration of action will equal or exceed about 6—8 hours. Examples of long-acting NSAIDS
`
`are: flurbiprofen with a half—life of about 6 hours; ketoprofen with a half~1ife of about 2 to 4
`
`hours; naproxen or naproxen sodium with half-lives of about 12 to 15 hours and about 12 to
`13 hours respectively; oxaprozin with a half life of about 42 to 50 hours; etodolac with a
`
`half—life of about 7 hours; indomethacin with a half-life of about 4 to 6 hours; ketorolac with .
`
`a half-life of up to about 8-9 hours, nabumetone with a half-life of about 22 to 30 hours;
`
`mefenamic acid with a half—life of up to about 4 hours; and piroxicam with a half-life of
`
`about 4 to 6 hours.
`
`If an NSAID does not naturally have a half-life sufficient to be long
`
`acting, it can, if desired, be made long acting by the way in which it is formulated. For
`
`example, NSAIDS such as acetaminophen and aspirin may be formulated in a manner to
`
`increase their half-life or duration of action. Methods for making appropriate formulations
`
`are well known in the art (see e.g. Remington’s Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16"‘ ed., A. Oslo
`
`editor, Easton, PA (1980)).
`
`It is expected that a skilled pharmacologist may adjust the amount of drug in a
`pharmaceutical composition or administered to a patient based upon standard techniques.
`
`well known in the art. Nevertheless, the following general guidelines are provided:
`
`Indomethacin is particularly useful when contained in tablets or capsules in an
`
`amount from about 25 to 75 mg. A typical daily oral dosage of indomethacin is
`
`three 25 mg doses taken at intervals during the day. However, daily dosages of
`
`up to about 150 mg are usefiil in some patients.
`
`Aspirin will typically be present in tablets or capsules in an amount of between
`
`about 250 mg and 1000 mg. Typical daily dosages will be in an amount ranging
`
`from 500 mg to about 10 g. However, low dose aspirin present at 20—200 mg
`
`(and preferably 40-100 mg) per tablet or capsule may also be used.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Ibuprofen may be provided in tablets or capsules of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600,
`
`or 800 mg. Daily doses should not exceed 3200 mg. 200 mg — 800 mg may be
`
`particularly useful when given 3 or 4 times daily.
`
`

`
`10
`
`Flurbiprofen is usefiil when in tablets at about from 50 to 100 mg. Daily doses
`
`of about 100 to 500 mg, and particularly from about 200 to 300 mg, are usually
`
`effective.
`
`Ketoprofen is useful when contained in tablets or capsules in an amount of about
`
`25 to 75 mg. Daily doses of from 100 to 500 mg and particularly of about 100 to
`
`300 mg are typical as is about 25 to 50 mg every six to eight hours.
`
`Naproxen is particularly useful when contained in tablets or capsules in an
`
`amount of from 250 to 500 mg. For naproxen sodium, tablets of about 275 or
`
`about 550 mg are typically used.
`
`Initial doses of from 100 to 1250 mg, and
`
`particularly 350 to 800 mg are also used, with doses of about 550 mg being
`
`generally preferred.
`
`Oxaprozin may be used in tablets or capsules in the range of roughly 200 mg to
`
`1200 mg, with about 600 mg being preferred. Daily doses of 1200 mg have been
`
`found to be particularly usefiil and daily doses should not exceed 1800 mg or 26
`
`mg/kg.
`
`Etodolac is useful when provided in capsules of 200 mg to 300 mg or in tablets
`
`of about 400 mg. Useful doses for acute pain are 200-400 mg every six-eight
`
`hours, not to exceed 1200 mg/day. Patients weighing less than 60 kg are advised
`
`not to exceed doses of 20 mg/kg. Doses for other uses are also limited to 1200
`
`mg/day in divided doses, particularly 2, 3 or 4 times daily.
`
`Ketorolac is usefully provided in tablets of 1-50 mg, with about 10 mg being
`
`typical. Oral doses of up to 40 mg, and particularly 10-30 mg/day have been
`
`useful in the alleviation of pain.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Nabumetone may be provided in tablets or capsules of between 500 mg and 750
`
`mg. Daily doses of 1500-2000 mg, after an initial dose of 100 mg, are of
`
`particular use.
`
`

`
`ll
`
`Mefenamic acid is particularly useful when contained in tablets or capsules of
`
`50 mg to 500 mg, with 250 mg being typical. For acute pain, an initial dosage of
`
`1-1000 mg, and particularly about 500 mg, is useful, although other doses may
`
`be required for certain patients.
`
`Lomoxicam is provided in tablets of 4 mg or 8 mg. US6fll1 doses for acute pain
`
`are 8 mg or 16 mg daily, and for arthritis are 12 mg daily.
`
`Other NSAIDS that may be used include: celecoxib,
`
`rofecoxib, meloxicam,
`
`piroxicam, droxicam, tenoxicam, valdecoxib, parecoxib, etoricoxib, CS-502, JTE-522, L-
`
`.745,337, or NS398. JTE-522, L-745,337 and NS398 as described, inter alia, in Wakatani, et
`
`al. (Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 78:365-371 (1998)) and Panara, et al. (Br. J. Pharmacol. 1I6:2429- '
`
`2434 (1995)). The amount present in a tablet or administered to a patient will depend upon
`
`the particular NSAID being used. For example:
`
`10
`
`15
`
`Celecoxib may be administered in a tablet or capsule containing from about 100
`
`mg to about 500 mg or, preferably, from about 100 mg to about 200 mg.
`
`Piroxicam may be used in tablets or capsules containing from about 10 to 20
`
`20
`
`mg.
`
`Rofecoxib will typically be provided in tablets or capsules in an amount of 12.5,
`
`25 or 50 mg. The recommended initial daily dosage for the management of acute
`
`pain is 50 mg.
`
`Meloxicam is provided in tablets of 7.5 mg, with a recommended daily dose of
`
`7.5 or 15 mg for the management of osteoarthritis.
`
`Valdecoxib is provided in tablets of 10 or 20 mg, with a recommended daily
`
`dose of 10 mg for arthritis or 40 mg for dysmenorrhea.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`With respect to acid inhibitors, tablets or capsules may contain anywhere from 1 mg
`
`to as much as 1 g. Typical amounts for H2 blockers are: cimetidine, 100 to 800 mg/unit"
`
`

`
`12
`
`dose; ranitidine, 50-300 mg/unit dose; famotidine, 5-100 mg/unit dose; ebrotidine 400 — 800
`
`mg/unit dose; pabutidine 40 mg/unit dose; lafutidine 5-20 mg/unit dose; and nizatidine, 50-
`
`600 mg/unit dose. Proton pump inhibitors will typically be present at about 5 mg to 600 mg
`
`per unit dose. For example, the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole should be present in
`
`tablets or capsules in an amount from 5 to 50 mg, with about 10 or 20 mg being preferred.
`
`Other typical amounts are: esomeprazole, 5-100 mg, with about 40 mg being preferred;
`
`lansoprazole, 5-150 mg (preferably 5-50 mg), with about 7.5, 15 or 30 mg being most
`
`preferred; pantoprazole, 10-200 mg, with about 40 mg being preferred; and rabeprazole, 5-
`
`100 mg, with about 20 mg being preferred.
`
`Making of Pharmaceutical Preparations
`
`The pharmaceutical compositions of the invention include tablets, dragees, liquids
`
`and capsules and can be made in accordance with methods that are standard in the art (see,
`
`e.g., Remington’s Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16"‘ ed., A Oslo editor, Easton, Pa. (1980)).
`
`Drugs and drug combinations will typically be prepared in admixture with conventional
`
`excipients. Suitable carriers include, but are not limited to: water; salt solutions; alcohols;
`
`gum arabic; vegetable oils; benzyl alcohols; polyethylene glycols; gelatin; carbohydrates
`
`such as lactose, amylose or starch; magnesium stearate; talc; silicic acid; paraffin; perfume
`
`oil;
`
`fatty
`
`acid
`
`esters;
`
`hydroxymethylcellulose;
`
`polyvinyl
`
`pyrrolidone;
`
`etc. The
`
`pharmaceutical preparations can be sterilized and, if desired, mixed with auxiliary agents
`
`such as:
`
`lubricants, preservatives, disintegrants; stabilizers; wetting agents; emulsifiers;
`
`salts; buffers; coloring agents; flavoring agents; or aromatic substances.
`
`Enteric coating layer(s) may be applied onto the core or onto the barrier layer of the
`
`core using standard coating techniques. The enteric coating materials may be dissolved or
`
`dispersed in organic or aqueous solvents and may include one or more of the following
`
`materials: methacrylic acid copolymers, shellac, hydroxypropylmethcellulose phthalate,
`
`polyvinyl acetate phthalate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose trimellitate, carboxy1nethylethyl-
`
`cellulose, cellulose acetate phthalate or other suitable enteric coating poly1ner(s). The pH at
`
`which the enteric coat will dissolve can be controlled by the polymer or combination of
`
`polymers selected and/or ratio of pendant groups. For example, dissolution characteristics of
`
`the polymer film can be altered by the ratio of free carboxyl groups to ester groups. Enteric
`
`coating layers also contain pharmaceutically acceptable plasticizers such as triethyl citrate,
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`

`
`13
`
`dibutyl phthalate,
`
`triacetin, polyethylene glycols, polysorbates or other plasticizers.
`
`Additives such as dispersants, colorants, anti-adhering and anti~foaming agents may also be
`
`included.
`
`The Making of Tablet Dosage Forms
`
`Preferably, the combination of an acid inhibitor and an NSAID will be in the form of
`
`a bi- or multi-layer tablet. In a bilayer configuration, one portion of the tablet contains the
`
`acid inhibitor in the required dose along with appropriate excipients, agents to aid
`
`dissolution, lubricants, fillers, etc. The second portion of the tablet will contain the NSAID,
`
`preferably naproxen, in the required dose along with other excipients, dissolution agents,
`
`lubricants, fillers, etc. In the most preferred embodiment, the NSAID layer is surrounded by
`
`a polymeric coating which does not dissolve at a pH of less than 4. The NSAID may be
`
`granulated by methods such as slugging, low- or high— shear granulation, wet granulation, or
`
`fluidized—bed granulation. Of these processes, slugging generally produces tablets of less
`
`hardness and greater
`
`friability. Low—shear granulation, high-shear granulation, wet
`
`granulation and fluidized-bed granulation generally produce harder, less friable tablets.
`
`Example 1: Enteric Coated Naproxen Sodium Core and Famotidine
`Immediate Release
`
`Examples
`
`A schematic diagram of a four layer tablet dosage form is shown in Figure 1. The
`
`first layer contains naproxen sodium distributed throughout a matrix of pharmaceutically
`
`acceptable fillers, excipients, binding agents, disintegrants, and lubricants.
`
`The second layer is a barrier layer which protects the first layer containing naproxen
`
`sodium. The barrier film coat is applied by conventional pan coating technology and the
`
`weight of the barrier coat may vary from 1% to 3% of the core tablet weight. In particular
`
`embodiments, the core naproxen sodium tablet is coated with coating ingredients such as
`
`Opaspray® K-1-4210A or Opadry® YS—1—7006 (Colorcon, West Point, PA). Polymer film
`
`coating ingredients such as hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2910 and polyethylene glycol
`
`8000 in a coating suspension may also be used.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`

`
`14
`
`The function of the third layer is to prevent the release of naproxen sodium until the 5
`
`dosage form reaches an environment where the pH is above about 4 or 5. The enteric
`
`coating does not dissolve in areas of the GI tract where the pH may be below about 4 or S
`
`such as in an unprotected stomach. Methacrylic acid copolymers are used as the enteric
`
`coating ingredient, triethyl citrate and dibutyl phthalate are plasticizers, and ammonium
`
`hydroxide is used to adjust the pH of the dispersion. The coating dissolves only when the
`
`local pH is above, for example, 5.5 and, as a result, naproxen sodium is released.
`
`The outermost layer contains an “acid inhibitor” in an effective amount which is
`
`released from the dosage form immediately after administration to the patient. The acid
`
`inhibitor in the present example is a proton pump inhibitor or, preferably the H2 blocker '
`
`famotidine, which raises the pH of the gastrointestinal tract to above 4. The typical effective
`
`amount of famotidine in the dosage form will vary from 5 mg to 100 mg. A typical film
`
`coating formulation contains Opadry Clear® YS—1—7006 which helps in the formation of the
`
`film and in uniformly distributing famotidine within the fourth layer without tablets sticking
`
`to the coating pan or to each other during application of the film coat. Other ingredients may
`
`include: plasticizers such as triethyl citrate, dibutyl phthalate, and polyethylene glycol; anti-
`
`adhering agents such as talc;
`
`lubricating ingredients such as magnesium stearate; and
`
`opacifiers such as titanium dioxide.
`
`In addition, the pH of the film coating solution can be
`
`adjusted to aid in dissolution of the famotidine. The film coating is thin and rapidly releases
`
`famotidine for absorption.
`
`Core Tablet Ingredients
`
`% W/W
`
`mg/Tablet
`
`Naproxen sodium, USP
`
`74.074
`
`500.00
`
`Microcrystalline cellulose, NF
`(Avicel PH 200)
`
`Povidone (K29/32), USP
`
`Talc, USP
`
`Magnesium Stearate, NF
`
`17.166
`
`115.87
`
`3.450
`
`4.350
`
`0.960
`
`23.29
`
`29.36
`
`6.48
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Total
`
`100.00
`
`675.00
`
`

`
`15
`
`Barrier Film Coating Ingredients
`
`% W/W
`
`Opadry Clear® YS-1-7006
`
`Purified water USP
`
`Total
`
`5.00
`
`95.00
`
`100.00
`
`Enteric Coating Dispersion
`Ingredients
`
`% W/W
`
`Methacrylic Acid Copolymer, NF
`(Eudragit L-100-55)
`
`Methacrylic Acid Copolymer, NF
`(Eudragit L—100)
`
`Triethyl Citrate, NF
`
`Dibutyl Phthalate, NF
`
`Ammonium Hydroxide (30%), NF
`
`Purified water, USP
`
`Total
`
`7.30
`
`7.30
`
`2.95
`
`1.17
`
`0.87
`
`80.41
`
`100.00
`
`Famotidine Coating Dispersion
`
`Ingredients
`
`Famotidine, USP
`
`Opadry Clear® (YS-1-7006)
`
`'
`
`Talc, USP
`
`Purified Water, USP
`
`Total
`
`% W/W
`
`3.0
`
`5.0
`
`3.0
`
`89.0
`
`100.0
`
`Example 2: Enteric Coated Naproxen Core and Famotidine
`Immediate Release
`
`Figure 2 illustrates a three layered dosage form which releases famotidine
`
`immediately afier ingestion by the patient in order to raise the pH of the gastrointestinal
`
`tract
`
`to above about 4. The innermost
`
`layer contains naproxen uniformly distributed
`
`throughout a matrix of pharmaceutically acceptable excipients. These excipients perform
`
`specific functions and may serve as binders, disintegrants, or lubricants. A pharmaceutically
`
`acceptable enteric coating surrounds the naproxen core. The function of the enteric coat is to
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`

`
`16
`
`delay the release of naproxen until the dosage form reaches an environment where the pH is
`
`above about 4. The coating does not dissolve in the harshly acidic pH of the unprotected
`
`stomach. It contains methacrylic acid copolymers which prevent the release of naproxen in
`
`the unprotected stomach. Also included are:
`
`triethyl citrate, a plasticizer; simethicone
`
`emulsion, an anti-foaming agent; and sodium hydroxide which is used to adjust the pH of
`
`the dispersion.
`
`The outermost layer contains an “acid inhibitor” in an effective amount which is
`
`10
`
`15
`
`released from the dosage form immediately afler administration to the patient. The acid
`
`inhibitor in this example is a proton pump inhibitor or, preferably,
`
`the H2 blocker
`
`famotidine which raises the pH of the stomach to above 4. A typical
`
`film coating
`
`formulation contains Opadry Clear® YS-1-7006 which helps in the formation of the film
`
`and in uniformly distributing famotidine in the fourth layer without tablets sticking to the
`
`coating pan or sticking to each other during application of the film coat. Other ingredients
`
`are: plasticizers such as polyethylene glycol 8000; anti—adhering agents such as talc;
`
`lubricating ingredients such as magnesium stearate;, and opacifiers such as titanium dioxide.
`
`In addition, the pH of the film coating solution can be adjusted to aid in dissolution of the
`
`famotidine. The film coating is thin and rapidly releasespfa

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket