throbber
Case 1:14-cv-01067-LPS Document 40 Filed 10/09/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1026
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`GAMELOFT, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`GLU MOBILE INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`KING.COM LTD.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`NGMOCO, LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1067-LPS-CJB
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1068-LPS-CJB
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1070-LPS-CJB
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1071-LPS-CJB
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Ex. 1012 Page 1
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01067-LPS Document 40 Filed 10/09/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1027
`
`INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`ROVIO ANIMATION COMPANY,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`SUPERCELL, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1072-LPS-CJB
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1073-LPS-CJB
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Inventor Holdings, LLC ("Inventor Holdings") and Defendants Gameloft, Inc.,
`
`Glu Mobile, Inc., King.com Ltd., ngmoco, LLC, Rovio Animation and Supercell, Inc.
`
`(collectively, "Defendants") hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court that:
`
`1.
`
`These are patent infringement actions brought by IH against Defendants regarding
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,784,198 (the "'198 patent").
`
`2.
`
`On September 30, 2015, the Court entered a Memorandum Opinion and Order
`
`(D.I. 38, 39, C.A. No. 1:14-cv-1067; D.I. 37, 38, C.A. No.1:14-cv-01068; D.I. 37, 38, C.A. No.
`
`1:14-cv-1073, D.I. 35, 36 in 1:14-cv-1070, D.I. 37, 38 in 1:14-cv-1071, D.I. 37, 38 in 1:14-cv-
`
`1072) granting Defendants' Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Defendants' Motions
`
`to Dismiss.
`
`
`
`2
`
`Petitioner Ex. 1012 Page 2
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01067-LPS Document 40 Filed 10/09/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1028
`
`3.
`
`The Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order determined that the claims of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,784,198 (the "'198 patent") are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for covering
`
`unpatentable abstract ideas.
`
`4.
`
`Accordingly, the Court enters this Final Judgment in favor of Defendants and
`
`against Plaintiff Inventor Holdings on Inventor Holdings' claim for infringement of the '198
`
`patent as set forth in Inventor Holdings' complaints.
`
`The parties further stipulate that each party shall bear its own fees and costs.
`
`The parties further stipulate that Inventor Holdings waives appeal of the Final
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Judgment.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Petitioner Ex. 1012 Page 3
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01067-LPS Document 40 Filed 10/09/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1029
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`/s/ Bindu A. Palapura
`Richard L. Horwitz #2246
`David E. Moore #3983
`Bindu A. Palapura #5370
`Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
`1313 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 984-6000
`rhorwitz@potteranderson.com
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`
`Michael J. Sacksteder
`Lauren E. Whittemore
`Hana K. Andersen
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`555 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`(415) 875-2300
`msacksteder@fenwick.com
`lwhittemore@fenwick.com
`handersen@fenwick.com
`
`
`
`Carolyn C. Chang
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`(650) 988-8500
`cchang@fenwick.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`Glu Mobile, Inc., ngmoco, LLC, Rovio
`Animation and Supercell, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STAMOULIS & WEINBLATT LLC
`
`/s/ Richard C. Weinblatt
`Stamatios Stamoulis #4606
`Richard C. Weinblatt #5080
`Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC
`Two Fox Point Centre
`6 Denny Road, Suite 307
`Wilmington, DE 19809
`(302) 999-1540
`stamoulis@swdelaw.com
`weinblatt@swdelaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Inventor Holdings, LLC
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &
`TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Jack B. Blumenfeld
`Jack B. Blumenfeld #1014
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`
`Eric A. Buresh
`Michelle L. Marriott
`Mark Lang
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`6201 College Boulevard, suite 300
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`michelle.marriott@eriseip.com
`mark.lang@eriseip.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Gameloft, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Petitioner Ex. 1012 Page 4
`
`

`
`Case 1:14-cv-01067-LPS Document 40 Filed 10/09/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1030
`
`
`
`
`
`BLANK ROME LLP
`
`/s/ Steven L. Caponi
`Steven L. Caponi (DE Bar #3484)
`12 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 425-6400
`caponi@blankrome.com
`
`Heidi L. Keefe (pro hac vice)
`Mark R. Weinstein (pro hac vice)
`Elizabeth L. Stameshkin (pro hac vice)
`COOLEY LLP
`3175 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
`(650) 843-5000
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`mweinstein@cooley.com
`lstameshkin@cooley.com
`
`Michael Rhodes (pro hac vice)
`COOLEY LLP
`101 California Street. 5th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
`Telephone: (415) 693-2000
`mrhodes@cooley.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`King.com Ltd.
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED, this ____ day of _________________, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Petitioner Ex. 1012 Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket