`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Case No. 15-cv-01277-BLF
`Related Case Nos. 16-cv-01578-BLF; 16-cv-
`01579-BLF; 16-cv-01580-BLF; 16-cv-
`01581-BLF; 16-cv-02252-BLF
`
`ORDER STAYING CASES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GLOBAL FOUNDRIES U.S. INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS,
`INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`LAM Ex 1025-p. 1
`LAM v FLAMM
`IPR2015-01767
`
`
`
`Case 5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document 145 Filed 08/23/16 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, et
`al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`On August 8, 2016, the Court CONDITIONALLY GRANTED a stay pending inter partes
`
`review in the above-captioned actions. The Court conditioned the stay on agreements by
`
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. Inc. (“GLOBALFOUNDRIES”), Intel Corporation (“Intel”), Maxim
`
`Integrated Products, Inc. (“Maxim”), Micron Technology, Inc. (“Micron”), and Samsung
`
`Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and
`
`Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to be bound by an appropriate
`
`level of estoppel based on their involvement in the filing of IPR petitions by Lam Corp.
`
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Intel, Maxim, Micron, and Samsung have all filed declarations
`
`agreeing to be bound by the appropriate estoppel conditioned outlined in the Court’s Order. See
`
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Case No. 16-1578, ECF 27; Intel, Case No. 16-1579, ECF 34; Maxim,
`
`Case No. 16-1580, ECF 34; Micron, Case No. 16-1581, ECF 28; Samsung, Case No. 16-2252,
`
`ECF 101. Accordingly, the Court STAYS the above-captioned actions. The Court ORDERS the
`
`parties to file a joint status report within 21 days of the PTO’s final decisions on the IPR petitions.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: August 23, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` ______________________________________
`BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`LAM Ex 1025-p. 2
`LAM v FLAMM
`IPR2015-01767