`
`Cisco v. SSL
`IPR2015‐01754
`Exhibit 1068
`
`
`
`4/28/2016
`
`SSL Services, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Pursuant to Protective Order
`
`Vincent Parla
`
`Page 1
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` MARSHALL DIVISION
`______________________________
`SSL SERVICES, LLC, )
` )
` Plaintiff, ) Case No.
` )
` v. ) 2:15-cv-00433
` )
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., )
` )
` Defendant. )
`______________________________)
`
`
`
` *** HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ***
` *** PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER ***
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF VINCENT PARLA
`
` Thursday, April 28, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.
` Homewood Suites
` 100 Portsmouth Boulevard
` Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801
` REPORTED BY: Deanna J. Dean, RDR, CRR
` ------------------------------------------------
` DIGITAL EVIDENCE GROUP
` 1730 M Street NW, Suite 812
` Washington, DC 20036
` (202) 232-0646
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2016
`
`202-232-0646
`
`Cisco v. SSL
`IPR2015-01754
`
`PROTECTED ORDER MATERIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Ex. 2016
`Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`4/28/2016
`
`SSL Services, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Pursuant to Protective Order
`
`Vincent Parla
`
`Page 2
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
`Representing the Plaintiff:
` Fisch Sigler LLP
` 96 North Third Street, Suite 260
` San Jose, CA 95112
` (650) 362-8209
` By: Desmond Jui, Esq.
` desmond.jui@fischllp.com
` -and-
` Fisch Sigler LLP
` 5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Fourth Floor
` Washington, DC 20015
` (202) 362-3620
` By: Alan M. Fisch, Esq.
` R. William Sigler, Esq.
` alan.fisch@fischllp.com
` bill.sigler@fischllp.com
`
`Representing the Defendant:
` Duane Morris LLP
` 30 South 17th Street
` Philadelphia, PA 19103-4196
` (215) 979-1842
` By: Joseph A. Powers, Esq.
` japowers@duanemorris.com
`
`Also Present:
` William Slater, Videographer
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`
`15
`16
`
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2016
`
`202-232-0646
`
`PROTECTED ORDER MATERIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Ex. 2016
`Page 2 of 7
`
`
`
`4/28/2016
`
`SSL Services, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Pursuant to Protective Order
`
`Vincent Parla
`
`Page 3
`
` I N D E X
`
` VINCENT PARLA Page
` Examination By Mr. Jui 9
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
` Parla Description Page
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2016
`
`202-232-0646
`
`PROTECTED ORDER MATERIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Ex. 2016
`Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`4/28/2016
`
`SSL Services, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Pursuant to Protective Order
`
`Vincent Parla
`
`Page 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Exhibit 28 Document titled "
`
`,"
`
` Bates-stamped CISCO-00001018
`
`
`
` 343
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2016
`
`202-232-0646
`
`PROTECTED ORDER MATERIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Ex. 2016
`Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`4/28/2016
`
`SSL Services, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Pursuant to Protective Order
`
`Vincent Parla
`
`Page 353
`
` Q. Okay.
` A. And you know, I'm sure this was dismissed
`immediately as not practical and not useful because
`you wouldn't be able to port this approach to other
`platforms. It's very Windows-specific.
` Q. Okay. Are there any disadvantages to use
`a Winsock interceptor that you don't get with
`virtual adapter?
` A. Oh, tons of disadvantages. One, you're
`intercepting in user mode, so you're going to miss
`any kernel network traffic that might be generated
`by a kernel component. Again, you're going to run
`into the same type of, because it's a hooking-type
`intercept function, incompatibilities with other
`software. There could be other vendors who have
`layered service providers that conflict with yours.
`You would have to get the ordering right that your
`layered service provider sat below theirs. It
`would just be a terrible approach.
`
`
`1 2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2016
`
`202-232-0646
`
`PROTECTED ORDER MATERIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Ex. 2016
`Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`4/28/2016
`
`SSL Services, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Pursuant to Protective Order
`
`Vincent Parla
`
`Page 354
`
`www.Digita|EvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2016
`
`202-232-0646
`
`PROTECTED ORDER MATERIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Ex_ 2015
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`4/28/2016
`
`SSL Services, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Highly Confidential - Pursuant to Protective Order
`
`Vincent Parla
`
`Page 355
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` MR. JUI: Let's go off the record for a
` second.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 6:16.
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.com
`
`Digital Evidence Group C'rt 2016
`
`202-232-0646
`
`PROTECTED ORDER MATERIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`Ex. 2016
`Page 7 of 7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
