`
`Richard F. Giunta, Reg. No. 36,149
`
`Elisabeth H. Hunt, Reg. No. 67,336
`
`Randy J. Pritzker, Reg. No. 35,986
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`
`Boston, MA 02210
`
`617.646.8000
`
`Paper No. __
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`RPX CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`APPLICATIONS IN INTERNET TIME, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`IPR2015-01752
`Patent 7,356,482 B2
`_____________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO EXPUNGE CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION AND CONTINGENT MOTION TO KEEP
`CONFIDENTIAL AND SEPARATE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1
`I.
`II. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS ............................................................ 4
`III. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR EXPUNGING THE CONFIDENTIAL
`DOCUMENTS................................................................................................... 5
`A. Documents with Redacted Versions Available ........................................... 5
`B. Documents Sealed in Their Entirety without Redacted Versions ............... 8
`IV. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................12
`APPENDIX ..............................................................................................................14
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`CASES
`Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp.,
`897 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2018) ............................................................................12
`Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc.,
`IPR2013-00453, Paper 97 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 15, 2015) .................................... 5, 8, 9
`OTHER AUTHORITIES
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide (Nov. 2019) ........................................................ 4
`REGULATIONS
`37 C.F.R. § 42.56 ............................................................................................ 1, 4, 13
`
`ii
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56 and as authorized by the Board in its August
`
`24, 2020 Order Granting Petitioner’s Motions to Seal (Paper 120 at 9), Petitioner
`
`RPX Corporation respectfully requests that, for the reasons set forth below, the
`
`Board expunge from the record the confidential information that the Board
`
`previously ordered sealed in this proceeding. If the Board denies in whole or in
`
`part Petitioner’s expungement request, Petitioner requests that any document(s) the
`
`Board previously ordered sealed but does not order expunged be kept confidential
`
`and separate from the files of the involved patent. The parties have conferred, and
`
`Patent Owner indicated it may oppose expungement, but Patent Owner does not
`
`oppose maintaining the record sealed and confidential.
`
`Specifically, Petitioner requests that the following documents currently
`
`under seal be expunged from the record, because these documents contain
`
`Petitioner’s highly confidential business information and because redacted versions
`
`of many of these documents were filed in the record and are currently available to
`
`the public:1
`
`
`1 Petitioner is concurrently filing Motions to Expunge in related proceedings
`
`IPR2015-01750 and IPR2015-01751. The table below lists the paper and exhibit
`
`numbers of the sealed documents in IPR2015-01752, and the table provided as an
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper / Exhibit No.
`
`Paper 20
`Paper 28
`
`Paper 33
`
`Paper 38
`
`
`
`Document Description of Sealed Documents
`
`Patent Owners Preliminary Response
`Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Preliminary Response
`on Real-Party-In-Interest (RPI)
`Petitioner's Motion for Sanctions (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Patent Owner's Sur-Reply to Petition for Inter Partes
`Review (unredacted)
`Paper 39
`Patent Owner's Updated List of Exhibits
`Paper 40
`AIT's Opposition to Motion for Sanctions
`Paper 41
`Patent Owner's Updated List of Exhibits
`Paper 51
`Decision to Institute Inter Partes Review
`Petitioner's Opening Brief (CONFIDENTIAL)(Corrected) Paper 98
`Patent Owner's Opposition (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Paper 100
`Petitioner's Reply Brief (Confidential)
`Paper 101
`Hearing Transcript - Confidential
`Paper 110
`JUDGMENT Final Decision on Remand Terminating
`Paper 123
`Institution 35 U.S.C. 314, 315
`RPX000099 - RPX000233 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000014 - RPX000025 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000009 - RPX000011(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000012 - RPX000013 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000224 - RPX000271(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000076 (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000047 - RPX000067 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email From R. Giunta, dated November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`
`appendix to this motion lists the corresponding paper and exhibit numbers across
`
`Ex. 1119
`
`Ex. 1120
`
`Ex. 1121
`
`Ex. 1122
`
`Ex. 1123
`
`Ex. 1124
`Ex. 1125
`
`Ex. 1129
`
`all three related proceedings.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Document Description of Sealed Documents
`
`Email from R. Giunta, dated November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 30, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated December 1, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from K. Sarvaiya, dated December 2, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Nick Boebel (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Frank Knuettel (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated December 15, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from J. Pearce, dated December 15, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Article (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Second Declaration of William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX Form Membership Agreement
`RPX Form Membership Agreement
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Third Amendment to Membership and License Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 1 of 2
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 2 of 2
`Salesforce.com, Inc. Order Form (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Payment records by Salesforce to RPX
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Declaration of Steve W. Chiang (CONFIDENTIAL)
`3
`
`Paper / Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1131
`
`Ex. 1132
`
`Ex. 1133
`
`Ex. 1134
`Ex. 1135
`
`Ex. 1137
`Ex. 1138
`
`Ex. 1139
`
`Ex. 1140
`
`Ex. 1141
`
`Ex. 1142
`
`Ex. 1143
`
`Ex. 1146
`Ex. 1173
`
`Ex. 1174
`Ex. 1175
`Ex. 1176
`Ex. 1177
`
`Ex. 1178
`Ex. 1179
`Ex. 1179
`Ex. 1180
`Ex. 1181
`
`Ex. 1190
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Document Description of Sealed Documents
`
`RPX notice of production (CONFIDENTIAL)
`E-mail thread responsive to RPX notice of production
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of Steve W. Chiang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Petitioner's Responses to Patent Owner's Requests for
`Production, served November 3, 2015 (CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX document production RPX000074-RPX000075
`RPX document production RPX000037
`RPX document production RPX000077-RPX000090
`RPX document production RPX000068-RPX000073
`Comparison of Salesforce payments to RPX and RPX Net
`Income
`Exhibit 2027
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Paper / Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1191
`Ex. 1192
`
`Ex. 1194
`
`Ex. 1195
`
`Ex. 1196
`
`Ex. 2018
`Ex. 2019
`Ex. 2022
`Ex. 2025
`Ex. 2026
`
`Ex. 2027
`Ex. 2030
`
`II. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS
`A party may file a motion to expunge confidential information from the
`
`record. 37 C.F.R. § 42.56; see also Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, at 21-22
`
`(Nov. 2019). While “[t]here is an expectation that information will be made public
`
`where the existence of the information is referred to in a decision to grant or deny a
`
`request to institute a review or is identified in a final written decision following a
`
`trial,” the “rule balances the needs of the parties to submit confidential information
`
`with the public interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history
`
`for public notice purposes.” Id. at 22. A party seeking expungement from the
`
`record must show good cause by demonstrating “that any information sought to be
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`expunged constitutes confidential information, and that Petitioner's interest in
`
`expunging it outweighs the public's interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable history of this inter partes review.” Atlanta Gas Light Co. v.
`
`Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc., IPR2013-00453, Paper 97 at 2 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 15,
`
`2015).
`
`III. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR EXPUNGING THE CONFIDENTIAL
`DOCUMENTS
`The Board granted all six of Petitioner’s Motions to Seal, and sua sponte
`
`sealed the confidential version of the Final Decision on Remand (Paper 123; see
`
`Paper 124), thereby sealing all the documents listed in Section I of this motion.
`
`See Decisions Granting Petitioner’s Motions to Seal (Paper 53 at 11; Paper 120 at
`
`8-9). In its Decisions Granting Petitioner’s Motions to Seal, the Board found that
`
`good cause existed to seal all these documents for all of the reasons provided in the
`
`underlying motions to seal.
`
`A. Documents with Redacted Versions Available
`Redacted versions of many of the sealed documents were filed in the record
`
`and are currently available to the public. For ease of reference, the following table
`
`maps the confidential sealed documents with the corresponding redacted versions
`
`that are currently publicly available.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`Description of Sealed Paper
`
`Patent Owners Preliminary Response
`Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's
`Preliminary Response on Real-Party-
`In-Interest (RPI)
`Petitioner's Motion for Sanctions
`Patent Owner's Sur-Reply to Petition
`for Inter Partes Review
`Patent Owner's Updated List of
`Exhibits
`AIT's Opposition to Motion for
`Sanctions
`Patent Owner's Updated List of
`Exhibits
`Decision to Institute Inter Partes
`Review
`Petitioner's Opening Brief
`Patent Owner's Opposition
`Petitioner's Reply Brief
`Hearing Transcript
`JUDGMENT Final Decision on
`Remand Terminating Institution 35
`U.S.C. 314, 315
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sealed Document Redacted Version
`
`Paper 26
`Paper 29
`
`Paper 32
`Paper 37
`
`Paper 46
`
`Paper 48
`
`Paper 47
`
`Paper 60
`
`Paper 95
`Paper 104
`Paper 102
`Paper 121
`Paper 126
`
`Paper 20
`Paper 28
`
`
`Paper 33
`Paper 38
`
`Paper 39
`
`Paper 40
`
`Paper 41
`
`Paper 51
`
`Paper 98
`Paper 100
`Paper 101
`Paper 110
`Paper 123
`
`6
`
`
`
`Sealed Version Description Redacted Version Description
`
`RPX000099 - RPX000233
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Second Declaration of
`William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Declaration of Steve W.
`Chiang (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of
`Steve W. Chiang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of
`William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Petitioner's Responses to
`Patent Owner's Requests for
`Production, served November
`3, 2015 (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Exhibit 2027
`
`RPX000099 - RPX000233
`(Redacted Version)
`
`Second Declaration of William
`Chuang (Redacted)
`
`Declaration of Steve W. Chiang
`(Redacted)
`Transcript of deposition of Steve
`W. Chiang (Redacted) (Corrected)
`
`Transcript of deposition of
`William W. Chuang
`
`Petitioner's Responses to Patent
`Owner's Requests for Production,
`served November 3, 2015 (Public
`Version)
`Redacted Version of AIT Exhibit
`2027
`Redacted Version of AIT Exhibit
`2030
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1119
`
`Ex. 1173
`
`Ex. 1190
`
`Ex. 1194
`
`Ex. 1195
`
`Ex. 1196
`
`Ex. 2027
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 2030
`
`Exhibit 2030
`
`As the Board found in granting Petitioner’s six Motions to Seal, these
`
`confidential sealed documents contain Petitioner’s confidential and highly
`
`sensitive information, disclosure of which would adversely harm Petitioner. Paper
`
`53 at 3-9; Paper 120 at 3-7. The information reflected in the documents is
`
`confidential, sensitive commercial information, including RPX’s IPR litigation
`
`strategy, confidential agreements with a third party, communications referring to
`
`terms of those confidential agreements, sensitive and improper disclosures of the
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`confidential information, confidential business records, as well as trade secrets.
`
`Public disclosure of Petitioner’s highly confidential business information would
`
`cause great harm to Petitioner, including “severely impact[ing] RPX’s ability to
`
`conduct business with third parties[,]… negatively impact[ing] RPX’s business
`
`relationships,” and “provid[ing] an unfair advantage to current and future litigants
`
`and other adversarial parties with whom RPX deals[,]… [thus] hamper[ing] RPX’s
`
`ability to carry out its business.” Paper 112 at 6, 9.
`
`The public interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history
`
`for public notice purposes is adequately served by retaining only the redacted
`
`versions of the confidential documents in the record. These redacted versions
`
`“maintain the essence” of non-confidential material contained in the documents
`
`and relied upon in the Board’s Final Decision on Remand (Paper 126) and
`
`Decision Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing (Paper 140). Atlanta Gas
`
`Light at 2, 3.
`
`B. Documents Sealed in Their Entirety without Redacted Versions
`In ruling on Petitioner’s Motions to Seal, the Board found that good cause
`
`existed to seal certain documents in their entirety. As the Board found, these
`
`confidential sealed documents contain Petitioner’s confidential and highly
`
`sensitive information, disclosure of which would adversely harm Petitioner. Paper
`
`53 at 3-9; Paper 120 at 3-7. The information reflected in the documents is
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`confidential, sensitive commercial information, including RPX’s IPR litigation
`
`strategy, confidential agreements with a third party, communications referring to
`
`terms of those confidential agreements, sensitive and improper disclosures of the
`
`confidential information, confidential business records, as well as trade secrets.
`
`Public disclosure of Petitioner’s highly confidential business information would
`
`“severely impact RPX’s ability to conduct business with third parties[,]…
`
`negatively impact RPX’s business relationships,” and “provide an unfair advantage
`
`to current and future litigants and other adversarial parties with whom RPX
`
`deals[,]… [thus] hamper[ing] RPX’s ability to carry out its business.” Paper 112 at
`
`6, 9. Further, many of the documents were produced voluntarily by Petitioner. If
`
`confidential information produced voluntarily under a protective order were to be
`
`disclosed publicly, the producing party would be discouraged from volunteering
`
`discovery of confidential information in proceedings before the Board.
`
`Of the confidential documents sealed in their entirety, the following 25
`
`documents were not cited in the Board’s decisions on remand; therefore
`
`Petitioner's interest in maintaining their confidentiality through expungement far
`
`outweighs the (nonexistent) public interest in disclosure of these documents.
`
`Atlanta Gas Light at 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1123
`Ex. 1124
`Ex. 1125
`
`Ex. 1129
`
`Ex. 1131
`
`Ex. 1132
`
`Ex. 1133
`Ex. 1134
`Ex. 1135
`Ex. 1137
`Ex. 1138
`
`Ex. 1139
`
`Ex. 1140
`
`Ex. 1141
`
`Ex. 1142
`
`Ex. 1143
`Ex. 1146
`Ex. 1180
`Ex. 1181
`Ex. 1191
`Ex. 1192
`Ex. 2018
`Ex. 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`Description
`
`RPX000224 - RPX000271(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000076 (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000047 - RPX000067 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email From R. Giunta, dated November 29, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated November 28, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 30, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated December 1, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from K. Sarvaiya, dated December 2, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Nick Boebel (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Frank Knuettel (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated December 15, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from J. Pearce, dated December 15, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Article (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Salesforce.com, Inc. Order Form (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Payment records by Salesforce to RPX (CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX notice of production (CONFIDENTIAL)
`E-mail thread responsive to RPX notice of production
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX document production RPX000074-RPX000075
`RPX document production RPX000037
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 2025
`Ex. 2026
`
`
`RPX document production RPX000068-RPX000073
`Comparison of Salesforce payments to RPX and RPX Net Income
`
`Of the confidential documents sealed in their entirety, only the following ten
`
`documents were cited in the Board’s Final Decision on Remand (Paper 126) or
`
`Decision Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing (Paper 140):
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1120
`
`Ex. 1121
`
`Ex. 1122
`Ex. 1174
`Ex. 1175
`Ex. 1176
`Ex. 1177
`Ex. 1178
`Ex. 1179
`Ex. 1179
`Ex. 2022
`
`
`Description
`
`RPX000014 - RPX000025 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000009 - RPX000011(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000012 - RPX000013 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX Form Membership Agreement
`RPX Form Membership Agreement
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Third Amendment to Membership and License Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 1 of 2
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 2 of 2
`RPX document production RPX000077-RPX000090
`
`Of the above documents cited in the Board’s decisions, Ex. 1174 (RPX’s
`
`Form Membership Agreement) was relied upon in the Final Decision only to
`
`support that RPX’s business model involves securing license rights for its
`
`members, which was a fact not in dispute. Paper 126 at 12. Ex. 2022
`
`(Confidential Communications Log) was relied upon to support the Board’s
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`finding that there is “extensive record evidence of communications between RPX
`
`and Salesforce” (Paper 126 at 29), and the Federal Circuit’s publicly-available
`
`decision already lists the relevant log items relied upon by the Board. See
`
`Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336, 1341, 1355 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 2018). The other eight documents (Exs. 1120-1122 and 1175-1179) were
`
`cited in the Rehearing Decision in conjunction with Ex. 1174, only as evidence that
`
`“RPX’s typical membership agreements, of which Salesforce’s is included … do
`
`not include the filing of IPRs,” another fact that was not in dispute. Paper 140 at 8.
`
`Accordingly, the public’s interest is adequately served by the Board’s description
`
`of the documents in its Final Decision on Remand and Decision Denying
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing, because the relevant contents are already either
`
`described or disclosed in judgments and decisions by the Board and Federal Circuit
`
`and are also used only to support findings not in dispute.
`
`Balancing the adequately-served public interest with the aforementioned
`
`harms to Petitioner that would ensue from publicly disclosing the contents of those
`
`documents, all of the documents sealed in their entirety should be expunged from
`
`the record.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`protect Petitioner’s highly confidential business information and expunge the
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`confidential documents pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56. If the Board denies in
`
`whole or in part Petitioner’s expungement request, Petitioner requests that any and
`
`all currently sealed documents that are not expunged be kept confidential and
`
`separate from the files of the involved patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Elisabeth Hunt/
`Elisabeth H. Hunt, Reg. No. 67,336
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`APPENDIX
`CONSOLIDATED LISTING OF SEALED DOCUMENTS IN
`IPR2015-01750; IPR2015-01751; and IPR2015-01752
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`Patent Owners Preliminary
`Response
`Petitioner's Reply to Patent
`Owner's Preliminary Response
`on Real-Party-In-Interest (RPI)
`Petitioner's Motion for
`Sanctions (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Patent Owner's Sur-Reply to
`Petition for Inter Partes
`Review (unredacted)
`Patent Owner's Updated List of
`Exhibits
`AIT's Opposition to Motion for
`Sanctions
`Patent Owner's Updated List of
`Exhibits
`Decision to Institute Inter
`Partes Review
`Petitioner's Opening Brief
`(CONFIDENTIAL)(Corrected)
`Patent Owner's Opposition
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Petitioner's Reply Brief
`(Confidential)
`Hearing Transcript -
`Confidential
`JUDGMENT Final Decision
`on Remand Terminating
`Institution 35 U.S.C. 314, 315
`
`Paper 21
`
`Paper 28
`
`Paper 20
`
`Paper 28
`
`Paper 34
`
`Paper 34
`
`Paper 20
`
`Paper 28
`
`
`Paper 33
`
`Paper 38
`
`Paper 38
`
`Paper 38
`
`Paper 39
`
`Paper 40
`
`Paper 41
`
`Paper 51
`
`Paper 98
`
`Paper 39
`
`Paper 40
`
`Paper 41
`
`Paper 51
`
`Paper 39
`
`Paper 40
`
`Paper 41
`
`Paper 51
`
`Paper 100
`
`Paper 98
`
`Paper 100
`
`Paper 102
`
`Paper 100
`
`Paper 101
`
`Paper 103
`
`Paper 101
`
`Paper 112
`
`Paper 112
`
`Paper 110
`
`Paper 125
`
`Paper 125
`
`Paper 123
`
`14
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`RPX000099 - RPX000233
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000014 - RPX000025
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000009 -
`RPX000011(PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000012 - RPX000013
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000224 -
`RPX000271(PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000076 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000047 - RPX000067
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email From R. Giunta, dated
`November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated
`November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated
`November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated
`November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Ex. 1119
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`Ex. 1120
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Ex. 1121
`
`Ex. 1022
`
`Ex. 1022
`
`Ex. 1122
`
`Ex. 1023
`
`Ex. 1023
`
`Ex. 1123
`
`Ex. 1024
`
`Ex. 1025
`
`Ex. 1024
`
`Ex. 1025
`
`Ex. 1124
`
`Ex. 1125
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`Ex. 1129
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Ex. 1131
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`Ex. 1132
`
`Ex. 1033
`
`Ex. 1033
`
`Ex. 1133
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated
`November 30, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated
`December 1, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from K. Sarvaiya, dated
`December 2, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Nick Boebel
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Frank Knuettel
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated
`December 15, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from J. Pearce, dated
`December 15, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Article (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Second Declaration of William
`W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`Ex. 1034
`
`Ex. 1035
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`Ex. 1034
`
`Ex. 1035
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`Ex. 1134
`
`Ex. 1135
`
`Ex. 1037
`
`Ex. 1037
`
`Ex. 1137
`
`Ex. 1038
`
`Ex. 1038
`
`Ex. 1138
`
`Ex. 1039
`
`Ex. 1039
`
`Ex. 1139
`
`Ex. 1040
`
`Ex. 1040
`
`Ex. 1140
`
`Ex. 1041
`
`Ex. 1041
`
`Ex. 1141
`
`Ex. 1042
`
`Ex. 1042
`
`Ex. 1142
`
`Ex. 1043
`
`Ex. 1043
`
`Ex. 1143
`
`Ex. 1046
`
`Ex. 1073
`
`Ex. 1046
`
`Ex. 1073
`
`Ex. 1146
`
`Ex. 1173
`
`16
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`RPX Form Membership
`Agreement
`RPX Form Membership
`Agreement
`Confidential Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Third Amendment to
`Membership and License
`Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 1 of
`2
`Confidential Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 2 of
`2
`Salesforce.com, Inc. Order
`Form (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Payment records by Salesforce
`to RPX (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Declaration of Steve W.
`Chiang (CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX notice of production
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`E-mail thread responsive to
`RPX notice of production
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of
`Steve W. Chiang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of
`William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`Ex. 1074
`
`Ex. 1075
`
`Ex. 1076
`
`Ex. 1077
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`Ex. 1074
`
`Ex. 1075
`
`Ex. 1076
`
`Ex. 1077
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`Ex. 1174
`
`Ex. 1175
`
`Ex. 1176
`
`Ex. 1177
`
`Ex. 1078
`
`Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1078
`
`Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1178
`
`Ex. 1179
`
`Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1179
`
`Ex. 1080
`
`Ex. 1081
`
`Ex. 1090
`
`Ex. 1091
`
`Ex. 1080
`
`Ex. 1081
`
`Ex. 1090
`
`Ex. 1091
`
`Ex. 1180
`
`Ex. 1181
`
`Ex. 1190
`
`Ex. 1191
`
`Ex. 1092
`
`Ex. 1092
`
`Ex. 1192
`
`Ex. 1094
`
`Ex. 1094
`
`Ex. 1194
`
`Ex. 1095
`
`Ex. 1095
`
`Ex. 1195
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`Petitioner's Responses to
`Patent Owner's Requests for
`Production, served November
`3, 2015 (CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX document production
`RPX000074-RPX000075
`RPX document production
`RPX000037
`RPX document production
`RPX000077-RPX000090
`RPX document production
`RPX000068-RPX000073
`Comparison of Salesforce
`payments to RPX and RPX
`Net Income
`Exhibit 2027
`Exhibit 2030
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`Ex. 1096
`
`Ex. 1096
`
`Ex. 1196
`
`Ex. 2018
`
`Ex. 2019
`
`Ex. 2022
`
`Ex. 2025
`
`Ex. 2026
`
`Ex. 2027
`Ex. 2030
`
`
`Ex. 2018
`
`Ex. 2019
`
`Ex. 2022
`
`Ex. 2025
`
`Ex. 2026
`
`Ex. 2027
`Ex. 2030
`
`Ex. 2018
`
`Ex. 2019
`
`Ex. 2022
`
`Ex. 2025
`
`Ex. 2026
`
`Ex. 2027
`Ex. 2030
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(E)(4)
`
`I certify that on March 11, 2021, I will cause a copy of the foregoing
`
`document to be served via electronic mail, as previously consented to by Patent
`
`Owner, upon the following:
`
`Steven C. Sereboff
`Jonathan Pearce
`
`
`
`
`
`Andrea Pacelli
`
`Robert Whitman
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ssereboff@socalip.com
`jpearce@socalip.com
`uspto@socalip.com
`
`Andrea.Pacelli@us.kwm.com
`robert.whitman@us.kwm.com
`
`
`
`/MacAulay Rush/
`MacAulay S. Rush
`Paralegal
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`