`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01750, Paper 93
`IPR2015-01751, Paper 95
`IPR2015-01752, Paper 93
`Entered: February 13, 2019
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`RPX CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`APPLICATIONS IN INTERNET TIME, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2015-01750
`Patent 8,484,111 B2
`
`Case IPR2015-01751
`Case IPR2015-01752
`Patent 7,356,482 B21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, and
`JENNIFER MEYER CHAGNON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`CHAGNON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues common to all cases; therefore, we issue a
`single order to be entered in each case.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01750 (Patent 8,484,111 B2)
`IPR2015-01751, IPR2015-01752 (Patent 7,356,482 B2)
`
`
`The captioned proceedings have been remanded to the Board by the
`Federal Circuit. See Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp.,
`897 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2018). On December 7, 2018, we entered an Order
`setting forth a discovery and briefing schedule for the remanded
`proceedings. Paper 872. That Order set forth two alternative briefing
`schedules, dependent on whether Patent Owner filed an optional Motion for
`Additional Discovery. See id. at 2–4. The deadline has now passed for such
`a motion, and no motion has been filed. See id. at 3 (setting the deadline for
`the motion to February 8, 2019).
`Accordingly, the remaining briefing schedule for these remand
`proceedings as follows (see id. at 4):
`Paper
`Deadline
`Petitioner’s Opening Brief March 1, 2019
`Patent Owner’s
`Opposition
`Petitioner’s Reply Brief
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`Brief
`Oral Hearing
`
`Length
`14,000 words
`
`14,000 words
`
`7,000 words
`
`
`
`
`
`March 22, 2019
`
`April 5, 2019
`
`None authorized at this time3
`
`April 25, 2019 (1:00 PM EDT)
`
`All other instructions in the December 7th Order remain in effect.
`
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`2 This citation is to the paper filed in IPR2015-01750. The same paper was
`filed in IPR2015-01751 and IPR2015-01752.
`3 Patent Owner may contact the Board to discuss a Sur-Reply if it believes
`one is necessary after reviewing Petitioner’s Reply Brief.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01750 (Patent 8,484,111 B2)
`IPR2015-01751, IPR2015-01752 (Patent 7,356,482 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Richard F. Giunta
`Elisabeth H. Hunt
`Randy J. Pritzker
`Michael N. Rader
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`RGiunta-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`EHunt-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`RPritzker-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`MRader-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Steven C. Sereboff
`Jonathan Pearce
`SOCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP
`ssereboff@socalip.com
`jpearce@socalip.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`