IPR2015-01751, No. 143 Motion - Petitioners Motion to Expunge Confidential Information and Contingent Motion to Keep Confidential and Separate (P.T.A.B. Mar. 11, 2021)

Filed on behalf of Petitioner by:
`
`Richard F. Giunta, Reg. No. 36,149
`
`Elisabeth H. Hunt, Reg. No. 67,336
`
`Randy J. Pritzker, Reg. No. 35,986
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`
`Boston, MA 02210
`
`617.646.8000
`
`Paper No. __
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`RPX CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`APPLICATIONS IN INTERNET TIME, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`IPR2015-01751
`Patent 7,356,482 B2
`_____________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO EXPUNGE CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION AND CONTINGENT MOTION TO KEEP
`CONFIDENTIAL AND SEPARATE
`
`
`
`

`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1
`I.
`II. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS ............................................................ 4
`III. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR EXPUNGING THE CONFIDENTIAL
`DOCUMENTS................................................................................................... 5
`A. Documents with Redacted Versions Available ........................................... 5
`B. Documents Sealed in Their Entirety without Redacted Versions ............... 8
`IV. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................12
`APPENDIX ..............................................................................................................14
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`
`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`CASES
`Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp.,
`897 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2018) ............................................................................12
`Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc.,
`IPR2013-00453, Paper 97 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 15, 2015) .................................... 5, 8, 9
`OTHER AUTHORITIES
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide (Nov. 2019) ........................................................ 4
`REGULATIONS
`37 C.F.R. § 42.56 ............................................................................................ 1, 4, 13
`
`ii
`
`

`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56 and as authorized by the Board in its August
`
`24, 2020 Order Granting Petitioner’s Motions to Seal (Paper 122 at 9), Petitioner
`
`RPX Corporation respectfully requests that, for the reasons set forth below, the
`
`Board expunge from the record the confidential information that the Board
`
`previously ordered sealed in this proceeding. If the Board denies in whole or in
`
`part Petitioner’s expungement request, Petitioner requests that any document(s) the
`
`Board previously ordered sealed but does not order expunged be kept confidential
`
`and separate from the files of the involved patent. The parties have conferred, and
`
`Patent Owner indicated it may oppose expungement, but Patent Owner does not
`
`oppose maintaining the record sealed and confidential.
`
`Specifically, Petitioner requests that the following documents currently
`
`under seal be expunged from the record, because these documents contain
`
`Petitioner’s highly confidential business information and because redacted versions
`
`of many of these documents were filed in the record and are currently available to
`
`the public:1
`
`
`1 Petitioner is concurrently filing Motions to Expunge in related proceedings
`
`IPR2015-01750 and IPR2015-01752. The table below lists the paper and exhibit
`
`numbers of the sealed documents in IPR2015-01751, and the table provided as an
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`Paper / Exhibit No.
`
`Paper 20
`Paper 28
`
`Paper 34
`
`Paper 38
`
`Document Description of Sealed Documents
`
`Patent Owners Preliminary Response
`Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Preliminary Response
`on Real-Party-In-Interest (RPI)
`Petitioner's Motion for Sanctions (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Patent Owner's Sur-Reply to Petition for Inter Partes
`Review (unredacted)
`Paper 39
`Patent Owner's Updated List of Exhibits
`Paper 40
`AIT's Opposition to Motion for Sanctions
`Paper 41
`Patent Owner's Updated List of Exhibits
`Paper 51
`Decision to Institute Inter Partes Review
`Petitioner's Opening Brief (CONFIDENTIAL)(Corrected) Paper 100
`Patent Owner's Opposition (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Paper 102
`Petitioner's Reply Brief (Confidential)
`Paper 103
`Hearing Transcript - Confidential
`Paper 112
`JUDGMENT Final Decision on Remand Terminating
`Paper 125
`Institution 35 U.S.C. 314, 315
`RPX000099 - RPX000233 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000014 - RPX000025 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000009 - RPX000011(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000012 - RPX000013 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000224 - RPX000271(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000076 (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000047 - RPX000067 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email From R. Giunta, dated November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`
`appendix to this motion lists the corresponding paper and exhibit numbers across
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Ex. 1022
`
`Ex. 1023
`
`Ex. 1024
`Ex. 1025
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`all three related proceedings.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Document Description of Sealed Documents
`
`Email from R. Giunta, dated November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 30, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated December 1, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from K. Sarvaiya, dated December 2, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Nick Boebel (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Frank Knuettel (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated December 15, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from J. Pearce, dated December 15, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Article (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Second Declaration of William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX Form Membership Agreement
`RPX Form Membership Agreement
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Third Amendment to Membership and License Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 1 of 2
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 2 of 2
`Salesforce.com, Inc. Order Form (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Payment records by Salesforce to RPX
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Declaration of Steve W. Chiang (CONFIDENTIAL)
`3
`
`Paper / Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`Ex. 1033
`
`Ex. 1034
`Ex. 1035
`
`Ex. 1037
`Ex. 1038
`
`Ex. 1039
`
`Ex. 1040
`
`Ex. 1041
`
`Ex. 1042
`
`Ex. 1043
`
`Ex. 1046
`Ex. 1073
`
`Ex. 1074
`Ex. 1075
`Ex. 1076
`Ex. 1077
`
`Ex. 1078
`Ex. 1079
`Ex. 1079
`Ex. 1080
`Ex. 1081
`
`Ex. 1090
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Document Description of Sealed Documents
`
`RPX notice of production (CONFIDENTIAL)
`E-mail thread responsive to RPX notice of production
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of Steve W. Chiang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Petitioner's Responses to Patent Owner's Requests for
`Production, served November 3, 2015 (CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX document production RPX000074-RPX000075
`RPX document production RPX000037
`RPX document production RPX000077-RPX000090
`RPX document production RPX000068-RPX000073
`Comparison of Salesforce payments to RPX and RPX Net
`Income
`Exhibit 2027
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Paper / Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1091
`Ex. 1092
`
`Ex. 1094
`
`Ex. 1095
`
`Ex. 1096
`
`Ex. 2018
`Ex. 2019
`Ex. 2022
`Ex. 2025
`Ex. 2026
`
`Ex. 2027
`Ex. 2030
`
`II. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS
`A party may file a motion to expunge confidential information from the
`
`record. 37 C.F.R. § 42.56; see also Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, at 21-22
`
`(Nov. 2019). While “[t]here is an expectation that information will be made public
`
`where the existence of the information is referred to in a decision to grant or deny a
`
`request to institute a review or is identified in a final written decision following a
`
`trial,” the “rule balances the needs of the parties to submit confidential information
`
`with the public interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history
`
`for public notice purposes.” Id. at 22. A party seeking expungement from the
`
`record must show good cause by demonstrating “that any information sought to be
`4
`
`
`
`

`
`
`expunged constitutes confidential information, and that Petitioner's interest in
`
`expunging it outweighs the public's interest in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable history of this inter partes review.” Atlanta Gas Light Co. v.
`
`Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc., IPR2013-00453, Paper 97 at 2 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 15,
`
`2015).
`
`III. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR EXPUNGING THE CONFIDENTIAL
`DOCUMENTS
`The Board granted all six of Petitioner’s Motions to Seal, and sua sponte
`
`sealed the confidential version of the Final Decision on Remand (Paper 125; see
`
`Paper 126), thereby sealing all the documents listed in Section I of this motion.
`
`See Decisions Granting Petitioner’s Motions to Seal (Paper 53 at 11; Paper 122 at
`
`8-9). In its Decisions Granting Petitioner’s Motions to Seal, the Board found that
`
`good cause existed to seal all these documents for all of the reasons provided in the
`
`underlying motions to seal.
`
`A. Documents with Redacted Versions Available
`Redacted versions of many of the sealed documents were filed in the record
`
`and are currently available to the public. For ease of reference, the following table
`
`maps the confidential sealed documents with the corresponding redacted versions
`
`that are currently publicly available.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Description of Sealed Paper
`
`Patent Owners Preliminary Response
`Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's
`Preliminary Response on Real-Party-
`In-Interest (RPI)
`Petitioner's Motion for Sanctions
`Patent Owner's Sur-Reply to Petition
`for Inter Partes Review
`Patent Owner's Updated List of
`Exhibits
`AIT's Opposition to Motion for
`Sanctions
`Patent Owner's Updated List of
`Exhibits
`Decision to Institute Inter Partes
`Review
`Petitioner's Opening Brief
`Patent Owner's Opposition
`Petitioner's Reply Brief
`Hearing Transcript
`JUDGMENT Final Decision on
`Remand Terminating Institution 35
`U.S.C. 314, 315
`
`Sealed Document Redacted Version
`
`Paper 20
`Paper 28
`
`Paper 34
`Paper 38
`
`Paper 39
`
`Paper 40
`
`Paper 41
`
`Paper 51
`
`Paper 100
`Paper 102
`Paper 103
`Paper 112
`Paper 125
`
`Paper 26
`Paper 29
`
`Paper 32
`Paper 37
`
`Paper 46
`
`Paper 48
`
`Paper 47
`
`Paper 62
`
`Paper 97
`Paper 106
`Paper 104
`Paper 123
`Paper 128
`
`6
`
`

`Sealed Version Description Redacted Version Description
`
`RPX000099 - RPX000233
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Second Declaration of
`William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Declaration of Steve W.
`Chiang (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of
`Steve W. Chiang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of
`William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Petitioner's Responses to
`Patent Owner's Requests for
`Production, served November
`3, 2015 (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Exhibit 2027
`
`RPX000099 - RPX000233
`(Redacted Version)
`
`Second Declaration of William
`Chuang (Redacted)
`
`Declaration of Steve W. Chiang
`(Redacted)
`Transcript of deposition of Steve
`W. Chiang (Redacted) (Corrected)
`
`Transcript of deposition of
`William W. Chuang
`
`Petitioner's Responses to Patent
`Owner's Requests for Production,
`served November 3, 2015 (Public
`Version)
`Redacted Version of AIT Exhibit
`2027
`Redacted Version of AIT Exhibit
`2030
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Ex. 1073
`
`Ex. 1090
`
`Ex. 1094
`
`Ex. 1095
`
`Ex. 1096
`
`Ex. 2027
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 2030
`
`Exhibit 2030
`
`As the Board found in granting Petitioner’s six Motions to Seal, these
`
`confidential sealed documents contain Petitioner’s confidential and highly
`
`sensitive information, disclosure of which would adversely harm Petitioner. Paper
`
`53 at 3-9; Paper 122 at 3-7. The information reflected in the documents is
`
`confidential, sensitive commercial information, including RPX’s IPR litigation
`
`strategy, confidential agreements with a third party, communications referring to
`
`terms of those confidential agreements, sensitive and improper disclosures of the
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`
`
`confidential information, confidential business records, as well as trade secrets.
`
`Public disclosure of Petitioner’s highly confidential business information would
`
`cause great harm to Petitioner, including “severely impact[ing] RPX’s ability to
`
`conduct business with third parties[,]… negatively impact[ing] RPX’s business
`
`relationships,” and “provid[ing] an unfair advantage to current and future litigants
`
`and other adversarial parties with whom RPX deals[,]… [thus] hamper[ing] RPX’s
`
`ability to carry out its business.” Paper 114 at 6, 9.
`
`The public interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history
`
`for public notice purposes is adequately served by retaining only the redacted
`
`versions of the confidential documents in the record. These redacted versions
`
`“maintain the essence” of non-confidential material contained in the documents
`
`and relied upon in the Board’s Final Decision on Remand (Paper 128) and
`
`Decision Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing (Paper 142). Atlanta Gas
`
`Light at 2, 3.
`
`B. Documents Sealed in Their Entirety Without Redacted Versions
`In ruling on Petitioner’s Motions to Seal, the Board found that good cause
`
`existed to seal certain documents in their entirety. As the Board found, these
`
`confidential sealed documents contain Petitioner’s confidential and highly
`
`sensitive information, disclosure of which would adversely harm Petitioner. Paper
`
`53 at 3-9; Paper 122 at 3-7. The information reflected in the documents is
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`
`
`confidential, sensitive commercial information, including RPX’s IPR litigation
`
`strategy, confidential agreements with a third party, communications referring to
`
`terms of those confidential agreements, sensitive and improper disclosures of the
`
`confidential information, confidential business records, as well as trade secrets.
`
`Public disclosure of Petitioner’s highly confidential business information would
`
`“severely impact RPX’s ability to conduct business with third parties[,]…
`
`negatively impact RPX’s business relationships,” and “provide an unfair advantage
`
`to current and future litigants and other adversarial parties with whom RPX
`
`deals[,]… [thus] hamper[ing] RPX’s ability to carry out its business.” Paper 114 at
`
`6, 9. Further, many of the documents were produced voluntarily by Petitioner. If
`
`confidential information produced voluntarily under a protective order were to be
`
`disclosed publicly, the producing party would be discouraged from volunteering
`
`discovery of confidential information in proceedings before the Board.
`
`Of the confidential documents sealed in their entirety, the following 25
`
`documents were not cited in the Board’s decisions on remand; therefore
`
`Petitioner's interest in maintaining their confidentiality through expungement far
`
`outweighs the (nonexistent) public interest in disclosure of these documents.
`
`Atlanta Gas Light at 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1023
`Ex. 1024
`Ex. 1025
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`Ex. 1033
`Ex. 1034
`Ex. 1035
`Ex. 1037
`Ex. 1038
`
`Ex. 1039
`
`Ex. 1040
`
`Ex. 1041
`
`Ex. 1042
`
`Ex. 1043
`Ex. 1046
`Ex. 1080
`Ex. 1081
`Ex. 1091
`Ex. 1092
`Ex. 2018
`Ex. 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`Description
`
`RPX000224 - RPX000271(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000076 (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000047 - RPX000067 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email From R. Giunta, dated November 29, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated November 28, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated November 30, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated December 1, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from K. Sarvaiya, dated December 2, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Nick Boebel (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Frank Knuettel (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated December 15, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from J. Pearce, dated December 15, 2015 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Article (PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL)
`Salesforce.com, Inc. Order Form (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Payment records by Salesforce to RPX (CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX notice of production (CONFIDENTIAL)
`E-mail thread responsive to RPX notice of production
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX document production RPX000074-RPX000075
`RPX document production RPX000037
`10
`
`

`
`
`Ex. 2025
`Ex. 2026
`
`
`RPX document production RPX000068-RPX000073
`Comparison of Salesforce payments to RPX and RPX Net Income
`
`Of the confidential documents sealed in their entirety, only the following ten
`
`documents were cited in the Board’s Final Decision on Remand (Paper 128) or
`
`Decision Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing (Paper 142):
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Ex. 1022
`Ex. 1074
`Ex. 1075
`Ex. 1076
`Ex. 1077
`Ex. 1078
`Ex. 1079
`Ex. 1079
`Ex. 2022
`
`
`Description
`
`RPX000014 - RPX000025 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000009 - RPX000011(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000012 - RPX000013 (PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX Form Membership Agreement
`RPX Form Membership Agreement
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Third Amendment to Membership and License Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 1 of 2
`Confidential Agreement (CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 2 of 2
`RPX document production RPX000077-RPX000090
`
`Of the above documents cited in the Board’s decisions, Ex. 1074 (RPX’s
`
`Form Membership Agreement) was relied upon in the Final Decision only to
`
`support that RPX’s business model involves securing license rights for its
`
`members, which was a fact not in dispute. Paper 128 at 12. Ex. 2022
`
`(Confidential Communications Log) was relied upon to support the Board’s
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`
`
`finding that there is “extensive record evidence of communications between RPX
`
`and Salesforce” (Paper 128 at 29), and the Federal Circuit’s publicly-available
`
`decision already lists the relevant log items relied upon by the Board. See
`
`Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336, 1341, 1355 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 2018). The other eight documents (Exs. 1020-1022 and 1075-1079) were
`
`cited in the Rehearing Decision in conjunction with Ex. 1074, only as evidence that
`
`“RPX’s typical membership agreements, of which Salesforce’s is included … do
`
`not include the filing of IPRs,” another fact that was not in dispute. Paper 142 at 8.
`
`Accordingly, the public’s interest is adequately served by the Board’s description
`
`of the documents in its Final Decision on Remand and Decision Denying
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing, because the relevant contents are already either
`
`described or disclosed in judgments and decisions by the Board and Federal Circuit
`
`and are also used only to support findings not in dispute.
`
`Balancing the adequately-served public interest with the aforementioned
`
`harms to Petitioner that would ensue from publicly disclosing the contents of those
`
`documents, all of the documents sealed in their entirety should be expunged from
`
`the record.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`protect Petitioner’s highly confidential business information and expunge the
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`
`
`confidential documents pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56. If the Board denies in
`
`whole or in part Petitioner’s expungement request, Petitioner requests that any and
`
`all currently sealed documents that are not expunged be kept confidential and
`
`separate from the files of the involved patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Elisabeth Hunt/
`Elisabeth H. Hunt, Reg. No. 67,336
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`APPENDIX
`CONSOLIDATED LISTING OF SEALED DOCUMENTS IN
`IPR2015-01750; IPR2015-01751; and IPR2015-01752
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`Patent Owners Preliminary
`Response
`Petitioner's Reply to Patent
`Owner's Preliminary Response
`on Real-Party-In-Interest (RPI)
`Petitioner's Motion for
`Sanctions (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Patent Owner's Sur-Reply to
`Petition for Inter Partes
`Review (unredacted)
`Patent Owner's Updated List of
`Exhibits
`AIT's Opposition to Motion for
`Sanctions
`Patent Owner's Updated List of
`Exhibits
`Decision to Institute Inter
`Partes Review
`Petitioner's Opening Brief
`(CONFIDENTIAL)(Corrected)
`Patent Owner's Opposition
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Petitioner's Reply Brief
`(Confidential)
`Hearing Transcript -
`Confidential
`JUDGMENT Final Decision
`on Remand Terminating
`Institution 35 U.S.C. 314, 315
`
`Paper 21
`
`Paper 28
`
`Paper 20
`
`Paper 28
`
`Paper 34
`
`Paper 34
`
`Paper 20
`
`Paper 28
`
`
`Paper 33
`
`Paper 38
`
`Paper 38
`
`Paper 38
`
`Paper 39
`
`Paper 40
`
`Paper 41
`
`Paper 51
`
`Paper 98
`
`Paper 39
`
`Paper 40
`
`Paper 41
`
`Paper 51
`
`Paper 39
`
`Paper 40
`
`Paper 41
`
`Paper 51
`
`Paper 100
`
`Paper 98
`
`Paper 100
`
`Paper 102
`
`Paper 100
`
`Paper 101
`
`Paper 103
`
`Paper 101
`
`Paper 112
`
`Paper 112
`
`Paper 110
`
`Paper 125
`
`Paper 125
`
`Paper 123
`
`14
`
`

`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`RPX000099 - RPX000233
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000014 - RPX000025
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000009 -
`RPX000011(PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000012 - RPX000013
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`RPX000224 -
`RPX000271(PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000076 (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`RPX000047 - RPX000067
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email From R. Giunta, dated
`November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated
`November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated
`November 28, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated
`November 29, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Ex. 1119
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`Ex. 1020
`
`Ex. 1120
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Ex. 1021
`
`Ex. 1121
`
`Ex. 1022
`
`Ex. 1022
`
`Ex. 1122
`
`Ex. 1023
`
`Ex. 1023
`
`Ex. 1123
`
`Ex. 1024
`
`Ex. 1025
`
`Ex. 1024
`
`Ex. 1025
`
`Ex. 1124
`
`Ex. 1125
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`Ex. 1029
`
`Ex. 1129
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`Ex. 1131
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`Ex. 1032
`
`Ex. 1132
`
`Ex. 1033
`
`Ex. 1033
`
`Ex. 1133
`
`15
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from S. Sereboff, dated
`November 30, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Screenshot (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated
`December 1, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from K. Sarvaiya, dated
`December 2, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Nick Boebel
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Declaration of Frank Knuettel
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from R. Giunta, dated
`December 15, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Email from J. Pearce, dated
`December 15, 2015
`(PROTECTIVE ORDER
`MATERIAL)
`Article (PROTECTIVE
`ORDER MATERIAL)
`Second Declaration of William
`W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`Ex. 1034
`
`Ex. 1035
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`Ex. 1034
`
`Ex. 1035
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`Ex. 1134
`
`Ex. 1135
`
`Ex. 1037
`
`Ex. 1037
`
`Ex. 1137
`
`Ex. 1038
`
`Ex. 1038
`
`Ex. 1138
`
`Ex. 1039
`
`Ex. 1039
`
`Ex. 1139
`
`Ex. 1040
`
`Ex. 1040
`
`Ex. 1140
`
`Ex. 1041
`
`Ex. 1041
`
`Ex. 1141
`
`Ex. 1042
`
`Ex. 1042
`
`Ex. 1142
`
`Ex. 1043
`
`Ex. 1043
`
`Ex. 1143
`
`Ex. 1046
`
`Ex. 1073
`
`Ex. 1046
`
`Ex. 1073
`
`Ex. 1146
`
`Ex. 1173
`
`16
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`RPX Form Membership
`Agreement
`RPX Form Membership
`Agreement
`Confidential Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Third Amendment to
`Membership and License
`Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Confidential Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 1 of
`2
`Confidential Agreement
`(CONFIDENTIAL) - Part 2 of
`2
`Salesforce.com, Inc. Order
`Form (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Payment records by Salesforce
`to RPX (CONFIDENTIAL)
`Declaration of Steve W.
`Chiang (CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX notice of production
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`E-mail thread responsive to
`RPX notice of production
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of
`Steve W. Chiang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`Transcript of deposition of
`William W. Chuang
`(CONFIDENTIAL)
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`Ex. 1074
`
`Ex. 1075
`
`Ex. 1076
`
`Ex. 1077
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`Ex. 1074
`
`Ex. 1075
`
`Ex. 1076
`
`Ex. 1077
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`Ex. 1174
`
`Ex. 1175
`
`Ex. 1176
`
`Ex. 1177
`
`Ex. 1078
`
`Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1078
`
`Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1178
`
`Ex. 1179
`
`Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1179
`
`Ex. 1080
`
`Ex. 1081
`
`Ex. 1090
`
`Ex. 1091
`
`Ex. 1080
`
`Ex. 1081
`
`Ex. 1090
`
`Ex. 1091
`
`Ex. 1180
`
`Ex. 1181
`
`Ex. 1190
`
`Ex. 1191
`
`Ex. 1092
`
`Ex. 1092
`
`Ex. 1192
`
`Ex. 1094
`
`Ex. 1094
`
`Ex. 1194
`
`Ex. 1095
`
`Ex. 1095
`
`Ex. 1195
`
`17
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Document Description of
`Sealed Documents
`
`Petitioner's Responses to
`Patent Owner's Requests for
`Production, served November
`3, 2015 (CONFIDENTIAL)
`RPX document production
`RPX000074-RPX000075
`RPX document production
`RPX000037
`RPX document production
`RPX000077-RPX000090
`RPX document production
`RPX000068-RPX000073
`Comparison of Salesforce
`payments to RPX and RPX
`Net Income
`Exhibit 2027
`Exhibit 2030
`
`IPR2015-
`01750
`
`IPR2015-
`01751
`
`IPR2015-
`01752
`
`Ex. 1096
`
`Ex. 1096
`
`Ex. 1196
`
`Ex. 2018
`
`Ex. 2019
`
`Ex. 2022
`
`Ex. 2025
`
`Ex. 2026
`
`Ex. 2027
`Ex. 2030
`
`
`Ex. 2018
`
`Ex. 2019
`
`Ex. 2022
`
`Ex. 2025
`
`Ex. 2026
`
`Ex. 2027
`Ex. 2030
`
`Ex. 2018
`
`Ex. 2019
`
`Ex. 2022
`
`Ex. 2025
`
`Ex. 2026
`
`Ex. 2027
`Ex. 2030
`
`
`18
`
`

`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(E)(4)
`
`I certify that on March 11, 2021, I will cause a copy of the foregoing
`
`document to be served via electronic mail, as previously consented to by Patent
`
`Owner, upon the following:
`
`Steven C. Sereboff
`Jonathan Pearce
`
`
`
`
`
`Andrea Pacelli
`
`Robert Whitman
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ssereboff@socalip.com
`jpearce@socalip.com
`uspto@socalip.com
`
`Andrea.Pacelli@us.kwm.com
`robert.whitman@us.kwm.com
`
`
`
`/MacAulay Rush/
`MacAulay S. Rush
`Paralegal
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

Up-to-date information for this case.
Email alerts whenever there is an update.
Full text search for other cases.
Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.

Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

Still Working On It

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

This document could not be displayed.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

One Moment Please

Your document is on its way!

Sealed Document

We are redirecting youto a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

We are unable to display this document.

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases