`Giunta, Rich; Steve Sereboff
`Hunt, Elisabeth
`RE: Case Nos 2015-01750, 2015-01751, 2015-01752 [A213-L15F15]
`Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:29:18 PM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Rich,
`
`We agree to abide by the terms of the protective order for the treatment of any confidential
`information disclosed during the call with the Board.
`
`
`Regards,
`Kala Sarvaiya
`SoCal IP Law Group LLP
`310 N. Westlake Blvd., Ste. 120
`Westlake Village, CA 91362
`Phone (805) 230-1350 x330
`Fax (805) 230-1355
`ksarvaiya@socalip.com
`www.socalip.com
`
`From: Rich Giunta [mailto:Rich.Giunta@WolfGreenfield.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 2:17 PM
`To: Steve Sereboff <SSereboff@socalip.com>
`Cc: Kala Sarvaiya <KSarvaiya@socalip.com>; Elisabeth H. Hunt
` <Elisabeth.Hunt@WolfGreenfield.com>
`Subject: RE: Case Nos 2015-01750, 2015-01751, 2015-01752
`
`Steve,
`
`Attached is the standing protective order and the standard acknowledgement from the Trial
`Practice Guide. Please review and let us know that if you will agree to abide by the terms of
`the protective order for the treatment of any confidential information disclosed during the call
`with the Board.
`
`Thanks,
`Rich
`
`From: Steve Sereboff [mailto:SSereboff@socalip.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 1:55 PM
`To: Giunta, Rich
`Cc: Kala Sarvaiya; Hunt, Elisabeth
`Subject: Re: Case Nos 2015-01750, 2015-01751, 2015-01752
`
`Rich, great idea. Please send it over. /steve/
`
`On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Rich Giunta <Rich.Giunta@WolfGreenfield.com> wrote:
`
`Steve,
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`RPX Exhibit 1026
`RPX v. AIT
`IPR2015-01751
`
`
`
`Would you be amenable to signing the Board’s standard protective order in
`advance of your requested call? If the Board has any questions that relate to
`confidential information it might make the call more productive if we have a
`protective order in place in advance.
`
`Please let us know.
`
`Thanks,
`Rich
`
`From: Steve Sereboff [mailto:SSereboff@socalip.com]
`Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 4:35 PM
`To: Trials@uspto.gov
`Cc: Kala Sarvaiya; Giunta, Rich; Hunt, Elisabeth
`Subject: Case Nos 2015-01750, 2015-01751, 2015-01752
`
`We are counsel to the patent owner in the three identified IPRs. The three petitions were
` filed 8-17-2015. We would like a conference call with the Board for permission to move for
` additional discovery in these three cases on the issue of real party in interest. We have
` asked the petitioner, RPX Corp, to cooperate in providing additional discovery. After
` reviewing our proposed document requests, Petitioner refused to cooperate. Thus, patent
` owner would like to file a motion for permission to serve the document requests and to
` receive a response on an expedited basis.
`
`Counsel for patent owner and petiioner are available September 16 from 2:30-6 pm and on
` September 18 at any time.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/Steven C. Sereboff/
`ph +1 (805) 230-1356
`mobile +1 (805) 279-0074
`SoCal IP Law Group LLP
`www.socalip.com
`310 N. Westlake Blvd., Suite 120, Westlake Village, CA 91362
`1332 Anacapa St., Suite 201, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
`ssereboff@socalip.com
`
`
`Page 2 of 2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
