throbber
Case 507-cv-00125-DF-CMC Document 260
`
`Filed 10/30/06
`
`Page
`
`of PageD
`
`5197
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`EPICREALM LICENSING LLC
`
`AUTOFLEX LEASING INC et al
`
`EPICREALM LICENSING LLC
`
`FRANKLIN COVEY CO et al
`
`No 205CV163
`
`No 205CV356
`
`ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
`REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United
`
`States Magistrate Judge Caroline
`
`Craven pursuant
`
`to 28 U.S.C
`
`636 The Report
`
`and Recommendation Regarding Claim Construction of the Magistrate
`
`Judge which
`
`contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations
`
`for the disposition of such
`
`action has been presented for consideration
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and Defendants both filed
`
`objections to the Report and Recommendation
`
`of
`
`the Magistrate Judge
`
`The Court
`
`conducted
`
`de novo review
`
`The Court having reviewed the relevant briefing finds the parties objections are
`
`without merit
`
`In their briefing the parties address among other
`
`things the word
`
`mechanism as used in the Magistrate Judges discussion of the construction of Web
`
`page
`
`See Report
`
`and Recommendation
`
`at pgs 8-9 As described within the
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1064, p. 1
`
`

`
`Case 507-cv-00125-DF-CMC Document 260
`
`Filed 10/30/06
`
`Page
`
`of
`
`PagelD
`
`5198
`
`specification Web page is mechanism through which static and dynamic content may
`
`be displayed.emphasis added
`
`Web page may include static or dynamic content
`
`However
`
`the Magistrate
`
`Judges
`
`construction
`
`of Web page as Web content
`
`displayable through Web browser does not include the word mechanism The Court
`
`adopts the construction of web page as proposed by the Magistrate Judge and with the
`
`exception of the use of the word mechanism the Court also adopts the reasoning of the
`
`Magistrate Judge with respect
`
`to the construction of Web page
`
`The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
`
`Judge are correct
`
`Therefore the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States
`
`Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`SIGNED this 30th day of October 2006
`
`DAVID FOLSOM
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1064, p. 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket