throbber
Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`Eric Aliman
`
`University of California BerkeI
`Mamm3th Project
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Version
`
`of sendmail
`
`includes
`
`from previous versions
`number of major changes
`very short history of sendmail
`summary of the major differences
`the last publically available version and version
`and some dis
`cussion of future directions
`
`This paper gives
`between version
`
`In 1987 the author stopped major work on sendmail due to other
`time committments only to return
`have been made
`to active work in 1991 This paper explores why work resumed and what changes
`
`gives
`
`Section
`
`and the motivation behind working on
`short history of sendmail
`through version
`rather detailed description of what has changed between version
`and version
`version
`Section
`has
`needs to be done
`The paper finishes off with some thoughts about what still
`
`HISTORY
`
`As discussed elsewhere Allman83a Allman83b AllmanAmos85J sendmail has existed in var
`in 4BSD and 4.1BSD and as send-
`ious forms since 1980
`It was released under the name delivermail
`mail in 4.2BSD It quickly became the dominant mail system for networked UNIX systems
`
`Prior the release of 4.3BSD in November
`1986 the author had left
`the University for private
`industry but continued to do some work on sendmai with activity slowly trailing off until effectively
`stopping after February 1987 Thei was minimal support done by many people for several years until
`July of 1991 when the original authoi who had returned the University started active work on it again
`
`reasons for renewed work on sendmail There was
`There were several
`desii at Berkeley
`to
`subdomained structure so that
`individuals were identified by their subdomain rather than by
`convert
`to
`their individual workstation although possible in the old code there were some problems and the
`author was the obvious person to address them The Computer Systems Research Group CSRG the
`group that produced the Berkeley Softwai Distributions was working on 4.4BSD and wanted an
`book on sendmai
`that was being reviewed
`update to the mail system Bryan Costales was working on
`by the authoi which encouraged him to make some revisions And the author wanted to try to unify
`some of the disparate versions of send mail that had been penrntted to proliferate
`During the 198791 fallow period many vendors and outside volunteers had produced variants of
`send mail Perhaps the best known is the IDA version IDA87J Originally intended to be
`new set of
`configuration files IDA expanded into
`fairly large set of patches for the code Originally produced in
`Sweden IDA development passed to the University of Illinois and was widely used by the fairly large
`set of people who prefer to get and compile their own source code rather than use vendor-supplied bina
`ries
`
`An earlier version of this paper was printed in the Proceedings of the 1994 AUUG Queensland Summer Technical Conference
`1994
`Gateway Hotel Brisbane March
`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 1
`
`

`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`In about
`
`that
`
`the same time frame attempts were made to clean up and extend the Simple Mail Tmns
`port Protocol 5MW
`This involved clarifications of some ambiguities in the protocol and
`correction of some problem areas RFC1 1231 as well as extensions for additional functionality dubbed
`Extended Simple Mail Transport Protocol or ESMTP RFC1425 RFC1426 RFC14271 and
`richer
`set of semantics in the body of messages the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions a.k.a MIJVIE
`RFC13441 Neither the IDA group nor most vendors were modifying sendmail
`to conform
`these were good things that should be encouraged
`to these new stanthrds
`It seemed clear
`since no one was working on
`publically available version of sendmai with these updates
`However
`they were unlikely to be widely deployed any time in the near future
`transport agents available such as MM DF zmai er Sinai and PP
`There are of course other mail
`none of these seemed to be gaining the prominence of sendmai
`it appeared that most compa
`However
`nies would not convert
`transport agent any time in the forseeable future However
`to another mail
`they
`newer version of sendmai
`
`might be persuaded to convert
`
`to
`
`All of these convinced the author
`
`to work on
`
`updated version of sendmail
`
`for public clistribu
`
`tion
`
`is referred to as version eight V8 Versions six and seven were
`The new version of sendmai
`files in 4.4BSD would be numbered as 8.1 Rather
`skipped because of an agreement
`have an external version number that differed from the file version numbers sendmai
`just jumped
`directly to V8
`
`that all
`
`than
`
`CHANGES IN VERSION EIGHT
`
`summary of the changes between the last commonly available version of send-
`The following is
`mail from Berkeley 5.67 and the latest version 8.6.6
`Many of these are ideas that had been tried in IDA but many of them were generalized in V8
`
`2.1 Performance Enhancements
`Instead of closing 5MW connections
`immediately open connections
`are cached for possible
`to the number of simultaneous open connections and the idle time of any
`future use There is
`
`limit
`
`individual connection
`
`This is of best help during queue processing since there is the potential of many different
`messages going to one site although it can also help when processing MX records which arent
`handled by MX Piggybacking
`
`single message happen to have the same set of MX
`If two hosts with different names in
`notices this and tries to batch the mes
`in the same transaction Version
`hosts they can be sent
`
`sages
`
`two sites foo.com and bar.com are both sewed by UUNET they will
`For example if
`have the same set of MX hosts and will be sent
`in one transaction UUNET will
`the mes
`then split
`sage and send it to the two individual hosts
`
`2.2 RFC 1123 Changes
`
`number of changes have been made to make sendmail conditionally compliant
`that is it
`satisfies all of the IVIUST clauses and most but not all of the SHOULD clauses in RFC 1123
`are numbers are RFC 1123 section numbers
`
`The major areas of change
`
`5.2.7
`
`Response to RCPT command is fast Previously sendmail expanded all aliases as far
`there were name sewer
`very long time particularly if
`this could take
`as it could
`for the existence of an alias and does the expansion
`only checks
`DNS lookup if
`there is an explicit host name in the RCPT com
`It does still do
`later
`mand but this time is bounded
`
`delays Version
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 2
`
`

`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`5.2.8
`
`Numeric IP addresses are logged in Received
`
`lines This helps tracing spoofed mes
`
`5.2.17
`
`5.3.2
`
`5.3.3
`
`5.3.3
`
`5.3.3
`
`sages
`
`Self domain literal
`is properly handled Previously if someone sent to user@1.2.3.4I
`configu
`where 1.2.3.4 is your IP address the mail would probably be rejected with
`ration error Version
`can handle these addresses
`
`individual
`
`timeouts RFC 821 specified no timeouts Older ver
`Better control over
`sions of sendmail had
`typically set to two hours Version
`single timeout
`allows the
`configuration file to set timeouts for various 5MW commands individually
`Error messages are sent as From This was urged by RFC 821 and reiterated by
`RFC 1123 but older versions of sendmail never really did it properly Version
`However
`some systems cannot handle this perfectly legal address
`if necessary you
`special mailer that uses the
`flag to disable this
`
`does
`
`can create
`
`Previously sendmail was happy
`Error messages are never sent
`to
`which
`sometimes
`resulted
`in responses-to-responses-to-
`responses-to-responses
`responses which resulted in ... you get the idea
`
`to send
`
`syntax are pruned RFC 821
`the ugly @hosta@hostbuser@hostc
`Route-addrs
`urged the use of this bletcherous syntax RFC 1123 has seen the light and officially
`deprecates them further urging that you eliminate all but user@hostc should you
`is slightly more generous than the standards
`receive one of these
`things Version
`instead of stripping off all
`the route addressees it only strips hosts off up to
`suggest
`the one before the last one known to DNS thus allowing you to have pseudo-hosts
`such as foo.BITNET The
`turn this off
`option will
`
`The areas in which sendmail
`
`is not unconditionally
`
`compliant are
`
`5.2.6
`
`5.2.10
`
`5.3.1.1
`
`5.3.1.1
`
`Sendmail does do header munging
`Sendmail doesnt always use the exact SMTP message text
`rather silly requirement
`
`from RFC 821 This is
`
`for each host on queue runs Connec
`Sendmail doesnt guarantee only one connect
`tion caching gives you most of this but
`it does not provide
`
`guarantee
`
`Sendmail doesnt always provide an adequate limit on concurrency
`That
`is there can
`independent sencimails running at once My feeling is that doing an abso
`be several
`lute limit would be mistake it might result in lost mail However
`if you use the
`XLA contributed
`software most of this will be guaranteed but dont guarantee the
`guarantee
`
`2.3 Extended SMTP Support
`Version includes both sending and receiving support for Extended SMTP support as defined
`for RFC 1426 BODY The body
`by RFC 1425 basic and RFC 1427 SIZE and limited support
`the 8BITMIME body type is not cuntntly advertised
`is minimal because
`Although such
`support
`body type will be accepted it will not be correctly converted to
`bits if speaking to
`MIJVIE aware SMTP server
`tries to speak ESMTP if you have the
`ndmai
`in the flags for the mailer descrip
`flag set
`it speaks ESMTR This is
`the other end advertises the fact
`non-standard advertise
`tor or if
`ment sendmai announces ESMTP spoken here during the initial connection message and client
`sendmails search for this message This creates some problems for some PC-based mailers which
`do not understand two-line greeting messages as required by RFC 821
`
`non-8-bit-
`
`that
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 3
`
`

`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`2.4 Eight-Bit Clean
`
`Previous versions of sendmail used the 0200 bit for quoting This version avoids that use
`to get seven bit stripping for compatibility with RFC 821 which is
`However you can set option
`bits on input
`7-bit protocol This option says strip to
`
`Individual mailers can still produce seven bit out put using the
`bits on output
`
`strip to
`
`mailer flag This flag says
`
`2.5 User Database
`The User Database UDB is an as-yet experimental attempt
`to provide unified large-site
`name support We are installing it at Berkeley futum versions may show significant modifications
`Briefly UDB contains
`database
`is intended to contain all
`information for your
`that
`the per-user
`workgroup such as peoples full names their plan information their outgoing mail name and their
`mail drop
`The user database allows you to map both incoming and outgoing addresses much like IDA
`the interface is still better with IDA in particular
`the alias file with incoming/outgoing
`However
`marks provides better
`locality of information
`
`2.6 Improved BIND Support
`The BIND support particularly for MX records had
`number of annoying features which
`have been removed in this release
`these more tightly bind pun intended the name
`In particular
`the name sewer resolution rules are incorporated directly into sendmail
`
`to sendmail so that
`
`sewer
`
`the
`
`operator didnt fully qualify names that were in
`does this qualification
`
`..
`
`has been that
`The major change
`or MX records Version
`DNS as
`run without BIND support
`This has proven to be an annoyance in Sun shops who often still
`that this be supported since MX mcords are mandatory In SunOS you
`However
`is really critical
`can choose either MX support or NIS support but not both This is fixed in Solaris and some send-
`mail support to allow this in SunOS should be forthcoming in future release
`
`it
`
`2.7 Keyed Files
`Generalized keyed files is an idea taken directly from IDA sendmail albeit with
`They can be useful on large sites
`diffemnt implementation
`
`completely
`
`Version includes the following built-in map classes
`
`dbm
`
`hash
`
`btree
`
`nis
`
`host
`
`dequote
`
`Support
`
`Support
`
`for the ndbm3 library
`for the Hash type from the new Berkeley db3 library this library pro
`than ndbm3 including in-memory
`vides
`database
`support
`substantially better
`caching arbitrarily long keys and values and better disk utilization
`for the B-Tree type from the new Berkeley db3 library B-Trees provide
`Support
`better clustering than Hashed files if you are fetching lots of records that have similar
`dictionary for words beginning with detr
`keys such as searching
`for NIS a.k.a YIP maps NIS is not supported in this version
`for DNS lookups
`
`Support
`
`Support
`
`con
`pseudo-map that is once that does not have any external data that allows
`figuration file to break apart
`quoted string in the address This is necessary primarily
`for DECnet addresses which often have quoted addresses that need to be unwrapped
`on gateways
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 4
`
`

`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`2.8 Multi-Word Classes
`
`Macms in Classes
`
`Classes can now be multiple words For example
`
`CShofmann.CS.Berkeley.EDU
`
`allows you to match the entire string hofmann.CS.Berkeley.EDU
`
`using the
`
`single construct
`
`Class definitions are now allowed to include macros
`
`for example
`
`Cw$k
`
`is legal
`
`2.9 IDENT Protocol Support
`
`as defined in RFC 1413 RFC1413I
`The IDENT protocol
`is supported However many sys
`renders this useless and the featum must be turned off Roughly if
`TCP/IP bug that
`tems have
`No
`host message
`of
`these
`receives
`route
`ICIVIP message
`one
`system
`ICIVIP UNREACH HOST on any connection
`Some fire-
`all connections
`to that host are closed
`to the IDENT port so you cant
`receive email from these
`walls return this error if you try to connect
`hosts on these systems Its possible that
`more specific message such as
`the firewall used
`ICMP UNREACH PORT or
`ICMP UNREACH PROTOCOL
`ICMP_UNREACH_NET_PRO
`HIB it would work but this hasnt been verified
`IDENT protocol support cannot be used on 4.3BSD Apollo DomainOS Apple A/UX Con
`vexOS Data General DG/UX HP-UX Sequent Dynix or Ultrix 4.x
`It seems to work on
`4.4BSD IBM AIX 3.x OSF/1 SGI IRIX Solaris SunOS and Ultrix 4.4
`
`to
`
`if
`
`2.10 Separate Envelope/Header
`
`Processing
`
`Since the From line is passed in separately from the envelope sender
`these have both been
`made visible the $g macro is set to the envelope sender during processing of mailer argument vec
`tors and the header sender during processing of headers
`
`It
`
`is also possible to specify separate per-mailer envelope and header processing The Sender
`RWSet and RecipientRWset
`different rewritings for envelope versus header additsses
`
`arguments for mailers can be specified as envelope/header
`
`to give
`
`2.11 Owner-List Propagates to Envelope
`
`When an alias has an associated owner-list name that alias is used to change
`sender address This will cause downstream errors to be returned to that owner
`
`the envelope
`
`the latter
`
`because
`
`the envelope sender
`
`Some people find this confusing
`is what appears in the first
`From_ line in UNIX messages that is the line beginning Fromspace instead of From
`is the header from which does indicate the sender of the message In previous versions
`has tried to avoid changing the envelope sender for back compatibility with UNIX conven
`sendmai
`tion at this point that back compatibility is creating too many problems and it
`is necessary to move
`forward into the 1980s
`
`2.12 Command Line Flags
`
`The
`
`flag has been added to pass in body type information
`
`The
`flag has been added to pass in protocol
`defining the Sr and Ss macros
`
`information that was previously passed in by
`
`The
`
`flag has been added to allow logging of all protocol
`filename and
`ging You can set
`complete transcript will be logged in that file This gets big
`fast the option is only for debugging
`
`in and out of sendmail
`
`for debug
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 5
`
`

`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`The
`run to specific
`flag can limit
`limit
`queue
`qRsub string qSsubstring or qlsub string respectively
`
`recipients senders or queue ids using
`
`2.13 New Configuration Line Types
`
`The
`
`Trusted users configuration line has been deleted
`
`It will still be accepted
`
`but will
`
`be ignored
`
`The
`
`The
`
`The
`
`line has been added to declare database maps
`
`line has been added to declare the configuration version level
`
`mailer line takes
`
`field to specify execution directoiy
`
`2.14 New and Extended Options
`
`Several new options have been added many to support new features others to allow tuning
`that was previously available only by recompiling Briefly
`
`can now be
`The alias file specification
`list of alias files Also the configuration can spec
`class of file For example to search the NIS aliases use OAnismail.aliases
`
`ify
`
`Insist on minimum number of disk blocks
`
`Delivery checkpoint
`
`interval Checkpoint
`
`the queue to avoid duplicate deliveries every
`
`addresses
`
`This message or the contents of the indicated file ai prepended
`
`Default error message
`to error messages
`Enable GECOS matching If you cant find
`local user name and this option is enabled
`full names Previously
`sequential scan of the passwd file to match against
`do
`
`compile
`
`option
`
`Maximum hop count Previously this was compiled in
`
`This option has been extended to allow setting of resolver parameters
`
`Send errors in MIJVIE-encapsulated
`
`format
`
`Forward file path Where to search for forward files
`
`defaults to $HOJVIE/.forward
`
`Coimection cache size The total number of connections that will be kept open at any time
`
`Coimection cache lifetime The amount of time any connection will be penrntted to sit
`idle
`
`Enable Errors-To header These headers violate RFC 1123 this option is included to pro
`vide back compatibility with old versions of sendmail
`Incoming daemon options e.g use alternate SMTP port
`Privacy options These can be used to make your SMTP server less friendly
`
`This option has been extended to allow finer grained control over timeouts For example
`you can set the timeout for SMTP commands individually
`Dont
`an
`Normally
`version
`sees
`address
`route-addrs
`like
`if
`prune
`try to strip off as much as it can up to
`@hostA@hostBuser@hostC sendmail will
`user@hostC as suggested by RFC 1123 This option disables that behaviour
`
`The Return To Sender timeout has been extended to allow specification of
`warning
`typically something on the order of four hours If message cannot be
`warning message is sent back to the sender but
`the message
`interval
`
`message interval
`delivered in that
`
`continues to be tried
`
`User database
`
`spec This is still experimental
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 6
`
`

`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`that has
`
`Failback MDC host This can be thought of as an IVIX host
`very high preference value that is use it only if everything else fails
`if you are the best MX host for
`If set assume that
`host you should send directly to that
`host This is intended for compatibility with UIUC sendmail and may have some use on
`firewalls
`
`that applies to all addresses
`
`Do not run eight bit clean Technically you have to assert this option to be RFC 821 com
`patible
`
`2.15 New Mailer Definitions
`
`Set
`
`the allowable line length In V5 the mailer flag implied
`characters this is now settable to an athitrary value
`Try to use ESMTP It will
`fall back to SMTP if the initial EHLO packet
`
`is rejected
`
`line length limit of 990
`
`Ensure
`
`blank line at the end of messages Useful on the file mailer
`last resort when dealing
`
`from addresses this should only be used as
`
`Strip all comments
`
`with cranky mailers
`Never use the null sender as the envelope sendeL even when rumiing SMTR This violates
`RFC 1123
`
`Strip all output
`
`to this mailer to
`
`bits
`
`to 990 bytes for SMTP compatibility
`Used to set the line limit
`It now does that only if the
`keyletter is not specified This flag is obsolete and should not be used
`
`Fa
`Fb
`Fc
`
`Fg
`
`F7
`FL
`
`2.16 New or Changed Pre-Defined Macros
`UUCP node name from uname2
`
`5k
`
`Sm
`
`Domain part of our full hostname
`
`Sw
`
`Sj
`
`sender address
`
`RFC 1413-provided
`Previously was sometimes the full domain name sometimes just the first word Now guar
`anteed to be the first word of the domain name i.e the host name
`
`Previously had to be defined
`be determined That
`
`it
`
`is now predefined to be the full domain name if
`to Sw.Sm
`is equivalent
`
`is it
`
`that can
`
`2.17 New and Changed Classes
`5k
`5w
`
`Initialized to contain $k
`Now includes 1.2.3.4I where 1.2.3.4 is your IP address to allow the configuration file
`to recognize your own IP address
`
`2.18 New Rewriting Tokens
`
`construct has been adopted from IDA to defer macro evaluation Normally macros
`The
`in rulesets are bound when the rule is first parsed during startup Some macros change during pro
`cessing and are uninteresting during startup However that macro can be referenced using Sx to
`
`defer the evaulation of Sx until
`
`the rule is processed
`
`The tokens
`
`and
`
`have been added to allow specification of map rewriting
`
`Version
`
`allows
`
`on the Left Hand Side of an
`intended to be used to match the null
`
`input
`
`line to match zero tokens
`
`This is
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 7
`
`

`
`2.19 Bigger Defaults
`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`Version
`
`allows up to 100 rulesets instead of 30 It
`reserved for sendmails dedicated use in future releases
`The total number of MX records that can be used has been raised to 20
`
`is recommended
`
`that
`
`rulesets 09 be
`
`The number of queued messages that can be handled at one time has been raised from 600 to
`
`1000
`
`2.20 Different Default Tuning Parameters
`
`Version
`
`has changed the default parameters for tuning queue costs to make the number of
`recipients more important than the size of the message for small messages This is reasonable if
`you are connected with reasonably fast links
`
`2.21 Auto-Quoting in Addresses
`Previously the Full Name email address syntax would generate incorrect protocol out
`put if Full Name had special characters such as dot This version puts quotes around such names
`
`2.22 Symbolic Names On Error Mailer
`
`Several names have been built in to the $@ portion of the $error mailer For example
`
`$error $@NOHOST
`
`Host unknown
`
`Prints the indicated message and sets the exit status of send mai
`
`to EX_NOHOST
`
`2.23 New Built-In Mailers
`
`Two new mailers file and include are included to define options when mailing to
`include file respectively Previously these were overloaded on the local mailer
`
`or
`
`file
`
`2.24 SMTP VRFY Doesnt Expand
`
`treated VRFY and EXPN the same
`Previous versions of sendmail
`doesnt expand aliases or follow forward files
`
`In this version VRFY
`
`As an optimization if you run with your default delivery mode being queue-only the RCPT
`command will also not chase aliases and forward files It will chase them when it processes the
`queue This speeds up RCPT processing
`
`2.25 IIPCI Mailers Allow Multiple Hosts
`When an address resolves to mailer that has IJPCI as its Path the $@ part host name
`single hostname
`This asks sendmail
`to search the
`colon-separated list of hosts instead of
`is available exactly as though it were an IVIX record The intent
`for the first entry that
`traffic through internal networks without publishing an MX record to the net MX expan
`sion is still done on the individual
`
`can be
`
`list
`
`is to route
`
`internal
`
`items
`
`2.26 Aliases Extended
`
`The implementation has been merged with maps Among other things this supports multiple
`alias files and NIS-based aliases For example
`
`OAIetc/aliasesnis mail.aliases
`
`will search first
`
`the local database /etc/aliases
`
`followed by the NIS map
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 8
`
`

`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`2.27 Portability and Security Enhancements
`
`number of internal changes
`
`have been made to enhance portability
`
`Several fixes have been made to increase the paranoia factor
`
`forward and include files have been tightened up
`In particulai
`the permissions mquired for
`considerably VS would pretty much read any file it could get to as root which exposed some secu
`rity holes V8 insists that all directories
`include file be searchable
`leading up to the forward or
`the file itself be madable by the con
`permission by the controlling user defined below that
`forward files be owned by the user who is being forwarded to or root
`trolling usei and that
`
`The controlling user is the user on whose behalf the mail
`is being delivered For example
`if you mail to userl then the controlling user for user1/.forward and any mailers invoked by that
`forward file including include files
`Previously anyone who had
`home directory could create
`forward could forward to pro
`grant Now sendmail checks
`to make sure that
`they have an approved shell that
`shell
`listed
`is
`
`in the /etc/shells file
`
`2.28 Miscellaneous Fixes and Enhancements
`
`number of small bugs having to do with things like backslash-escaped
`comments have been fixed
`
`quotes inside of
`
`The fixed size limit on header lines such as To and Cc has been eliminated those
`
`buffers are dynamically allocated now
`
`Sendmail writes
`
`/etc/sendmail.pid
`
`file with the cuntnt process id and the current
`
`invocation
`
`flags
`
`Two people using the same program e.g submit are considered different so that duplicate
`elimination doesnt delete one of them For example two people forwarding their email to submit
`will be tmated as two recipients
`
`The mailstats program prints mailer names and gets the location of the sendmail.st
`/etc/sendmail.cfi
`
`file from
`
`Many minor bugs have been fixed such as handling of backslashes inside of quotes
`
`hook has been added to allow rewriting of local addresses after aliasing
`
`FUTURE WORK
`
`The previous
`section describes sendmail
`Some high points are described below This list
`
`as of version 8.6.6 There is still much to be done
`is by no means exhaustive
`
`3.1 Full MIME Support
`Currently sendmai only supports seven bit MIME messages Although it can pass eight bit
`MIME messages it caimot advertise that
`the mail agent must be
`fact because the standards say that
`able to do 8- to 7-bit conversion to have full 8-bit support This requires far more extensive modifi
`cation of the message body than is cuntntly supported
`The best way to do this would be to support
`the general concept of an external message fil
`This would allow MIME conversion as
`ter that could do arbitrary modifications of the message
`well as such things as automatic encryption of messages sent over external
`links This is probably
`an extremely non-trivial change
`
`3.2 Service Switch Abstraction
`
`Most modern systems include some concept of
`for example to look up
`host names you can try DNS NIS NIS text
`tables Netlnfo or other services in some arbitrary
`
`service switch
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 9
`
`

`
`10
`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`order This is currently very clumsy in sendmai with only limited control of the services provided
`
`3.3 More Control of Local Addresses
`
`Currently some addresses are declared as local and are handled specially
`for example
`forward files may be translated into program calls or file deliveries and so forth
`they may have
`These should be broken out into separate flags to allow the local system administrator to have more
`
`fine-grained control over operations
`
`3.4 More Run-Time Configuration Options
`
`There are many options that are configured at compile time such as the method of file locking
`and the use of the IDENT protocol RFC 141
`These should be transfered to run time by adding
`new options
`
`Similarly some options are currently overloaded
`one thing These should probably be broken out
`
`into separate options
`
`that
`
`is
`
`single option controls more than
`
`This implies that options will change
`
`from single characters to words
`
`3.5 More Configuration Control Over Errors
`
`cannot
`
`can generate an error message during parsing However
`Currently the configuration file
`tweak other operations such as issuing warning message to the system postmaster Simi
`larly some errors should not be triggered if
`they are in aliases during an alias file rebuild but should
`be triggered if that alias is actually used
`
`it
`
`3.6 Long Term Host State
`
`Currently sendmai only remembers host status during
`single queue run This should be
`converted to long term status stored on disk so it can be shared between instantiations of sendmai
`so they can time out This will allow send mai
`Entries will have to be timestamped
`to implement
`exponential backoff on queue runs on
`
`per-host basis
`
`3.7 Connection Control
`
`Modem networks have different
`In particula the rising
`than the past
`types of connectivity
`is not uncommon
`prominence of dialup IP has created certain challenges for automated servers
`host and have it fail
`to try to make
`even though if you tried again it would suc
`connection to
`ceed The connection management could be
`bit cleverer
`to try to adapt to such situations
`
`It
`
`3.8 Other Caching
`When you do an MX record lookup the name server automatically returns the IP addresses of
`the associated MX servers This information is currently ignored and another query is done to get
`this information It should be cached to avoid excess name server traffic
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Allman83aI
`An Intemetwork Mail Router
`Sendmail
`Allman In Unix Prograrrnnss Manual 4.2
`Berkeley Software Distribution volume 2C August 1983
`
`Allman83bI
`Mail Systems and Addressing in 4.2BSD
`San Diego California January 1983
`
`AllmanAmos85I
`Sendmail Revisited
`Allman and
`ceeli ngs Portland Oregon June 1985
`
`Allman In UNICOM Conference Proceelings
`
`Amos In Usenix Srmer 1985 Conference Pro
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 10
`
`

`
`Changes in Sendmail Version
`
`11
`
`IDA87J Electronic Mail Addressing in Theory and Practice with the IDA ndmail Enhancerrnt Kit
`or The Postmasters Last WIl and Testarmit
`Lennart Lövstrand Department of Computer
`and Information Science University of Linköping Sweden Report no LiTH-IDA-Ex-87 15
`May 1987
`
`11
`
`Srrple Mail Transport Protocol
`
`Postel August 1982
`
`1231
`Ruirerrntsfor lntern HostsApplication
`Braden Editor October 1989
`
`and Spport
`
`Internet Engineering Task Force
`
`lrrplicationsof MIME for Internet Mail Gateways
`
`Borenstein June 1992
`
`Identification Protocol
`
`St Johns February 1993
`
`1425JTP Service Extensions
`
`February 1993
`
`Kiensin
`
`Freed
`
`Rose
`
`Stefferud and
`
`Crocker
`
`SV1TP rvice Extension for 8bit-MlMEtransport
`andD Crocker February 1993
`
`Kiensin
`
`Freed
`
`Rose
`
`Stefferud
`
`SV1TP rvice Extension for Message ze Declaration
`February 1993
`
`Kiensin
`
`Freed and
`
`Moore
`
`MIME Multipurpose
`Internet Mail Extensions Frt One Mechanisrrs for ecifying and
`Borenstein and
`Describing the Format of lntern Message Bodies
`Freed September
`1993
`
`Petitioner IBM – Ex. 1059, p. 11

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket